photo : Ì. Ìðáìðïýóçò, 2004
ÂÁËÁÂÁÍÉÄÇÓ ÃÉÁÍÍÇÓ ÂÁËÁÂÁÍÉÄÇÓ | ÙÓ Å×ÏÕÍ : ÐÑÏÓÙÐÁ - ÐÑÁÃÌÁÔÁ - ×ÙÑÏÉ 1962-2005 | ÌÏÕÓÅÉÏ ÖÑÕÓÉÑÁ
ÊÔÉÓÌÁÔÁ | STRUCTURES 1967, Áêñõëéêü óå íïâïðÜí | Acrylic on novopan, 50x60cm ÉäéùôéêÞ óõëëïãÞ | Private collection
012 | H ÆÙÃÑÁÖÉÊÇ ÔÏÕ ÃÉÁÍÍÇ BÁËÁÂÁÍÉÄÇ
THE PAINTING OF YANNIS VALAVANIDIS
Máôáéüôçôåò
Futility
Óå ìéá óõíïìéëßá ìáò äçìïóéåõìÝíç ðñï äåêáåôßáò, ï ÃéÜííçò
In one of our discussions which was published ten years ago,
Báëáâáíßäçò äÞëùíå ôçí åîÞò èÝóç: "Ná åëÝã÷ù áêüìá êáé ôçí ðéï
Yannis Valavanidis stated his wish "to control the slightest
ìéêñÞ ðéíåëéÜ, ðáñüëï ðïõ îÝñù üôé åßíáé ìÜôáéï". AíáñùôéÝìáé,
brush stroke, although I know it is futile". I have often wondered
áðü ôüôå, êáôÜ ðüóï áõôÞ ç äéáôýðùóç åêöñÜæåé, ðáñáäåßãìáôïò
whether this phrase reflected the artist's modesty or a kind
÷Üñéí, ôç óåìíüôçôá ôïõ æùãñÜöïõ Þ Ýíá åßäïò áëáæïíåßáò. ¼ôáí
of conceit. When an artist consents to become an observer of
Ýíáò êáëëéôÝ÷íçò äÝ÷åôáé íá ãßíåé ðáñáôçñçôÞò ôïõ åáõôïý ôïõ êáé
himself and about the way he sees his work, we have to respect
íá ìéëÞóåé ãéá ôïí ôñüðï ðïõ âëÝðåé ôç äïõëåéÜ ôïõ, óåâüìáóôå
what he says but not necessarily to accept it as a final
áíáãêáóôéêÜ áõôÜ ðïõ ëÝåé, ôßðïôå üìùò äåí ìáò õðï÷ñåþíåé íá ôá
judgement, or even as genuine, reliable testimonies. To most
äå÷èïýìå åîáñ÷Þò ùò ôåëéêÝò êñßóåéò ïýôå êáí ùò áõèåíôéêÝò, äçëáäÞ
people the painter speaks primarily through his work, and it
áîéüðéóôåò, ìáñôõñßåò. Ãéá ôïí ðåñéóóüôåñï êüóìï, ï æùãñÜöïò ìéëÜåé
is only secondarily that he is allowed to speak about his work.
ðñùôßóôùò ìå ôï Ýñãï ôïõ êáé ìüíï äåõôåñåõüíôùò ôïõ åðéôñÝðåôáé
And if he does, he should know how secondary it is, and how
íá ìéëÞóåé ãéá ôï Ýñãï ôïõ. Ké áí ôï êÜíåé, ðñÝðåé íá îÝñåé êáëÜ
futile. As futile as his attempt to keep even the slightest brush
ðüóï äåõôåñåýïí åßíáé, êáé ðüóï ìÜôáéï. MÜôáéï óáí ôçí ðñïóðÜèåéÜ
stroke under control.
ôïõ íá åëÝã÷åé ôçí ðáñáìéêñÞ ðéíåëéÜ.
Aware of all this, I asked the painter to note down his own
Eí ãíþóåé ôùí áíùôÝñù, æÞôçóá áðü ôï æùãñÜöï íá óçìåéþóåé ãñáðôþò
thoughts about his work, simply in order to continue a futile
ôéò äéêÝò ôïõ óêÝøåéò ãéá ôç äïõëåéÜ ôïõ, áðëþò ãéá íá óõíå÷ßóïõìå
but interesting discussion which has been going on for years.
ìéá ìÜôáéç áëëÜ åíäéáöÝñïõóá óõæÞôçóç ðïõ êñáôÜåé ÷ñüíéá. Eêåßíïò
He accepted, obviously for the same reasons. So I duly received
ôï äÝ÷èçêå, ðñïöáíþò ãéá ôïõò ßäéïõò ëüãïõò. ¸ëáâá ëïéðüí Ýíá
five densely written pages full of information and remarks, just
ðõêíïãñáììÝíï óçìåßùìá ðÝíôå óåëßäùí, ãåìÜôï ðëçñïöïñßåò êáé
as I expected it: clear, careful, restrained, sincere yet hardly
ðáñáôçñÞóåéò, üðùò áêñéâþò ôï ðåñßìåíá: êáèáñü, ðñïóåêôéêü,
revealing. I shall not attempt to base my own views of Yannis's
óõãêñáôçìÝíï, åéëéêñéíÝò, áí êáé åëÜ÷éóôá åîïìïëïãçôéêü. Äåí èá
work on that text of his. More than just futile, it would be wrong.
åðé÷åéñÞóù íá óôçñßîù óå áõôü ôï êåßìåíï ôïõ ÃéÜííç ôéò äéêÝò ìïõ
Still, I do trust his sincerity and the convincing character of
áðüøåéò ãéá ôï êáëëéôå÷íéêü ôïõ Ýñãï. Èá Þôáí ü÷é ìüíï ìÜôáéï, áëëÜ
his testimony, and I shall not resist the temptation to quote
êáé ëÜèïò. Eìðéóôåýïìáé üìùò ôçí åéëéêñßíåéá êáé ôçí ðåéóôéêüôçôá
some excerpts - with his permission, of course. These phrases
ôçò ìáñôõñßáò ôïõ êáé äåí áíôéóôÝêïìáé óôïí ðåéñáóìü íá ðáñáèÝóù
certainly do not answer all questions or solve the problems of
ìåñéêÜ áðïóðÜóìáôá, öõóéêÜ ìå ôçí ÜäåéÜ ôïõ, öñÜóåéò ðïõ äåí
interpretation; on the contrary, they pose some new questions
áðáíôïýí ïðùóäÞðïôå óå üëåò ôéò áðïñßåò, äåí ëýíïõí åñìçíåõôéêÜ
of minor importance - at first sight, at least.
ðñïâëÞìáôá,
For instance, I was surprised by the unexpectedly emotional
áíôéèÝôùò,
äçìéïõñãïýí
ìéêñÜ
åñùôÞìáôá
äåõôåñåýïõóáò óçìáóßáò, ôïõëÜ÷éóôïí åê ðñþôçò üøåùò.
opening of his text:
Ãéá ðáñÜäåéãìá, ìïõ Ýêáíå åíôýðùóç ï áðñïóäüêçôá óõíáéóèçìáôéêüò
"I have always loved the depiction of reality in painting; a
ôüíïò óôï îåêßíçìá ôïõ êåéìÝíïõ:
reality which keeps slipping through your hands like water."
038 |
ÐÑÏÓÙÐÏ | FACE 1997, ÔÝìðåñá óå ÷áñôß | Tempera on paper, 43x58cm ÐÑÏÓÙÐÏ | FACE 1998, ÔÝìðåñá óå ÷áñôß | Tempera on paper, 43x34cm
052 |
ÐÑÏÓÙÐÏ | FACE 1987, ÓéíéêÞ ìåëÜíç óå ÷áñôß | Indian ink on paper, 51x40cm ÉäéùôéêÞ óõëëïãÞ | Private collection ÐÑÏÓÙÐÏ | FACE 1990, ÔÝìðåñá óå ÷áñôß | Tempera on paper, 40x30cm Ìïõóåßï Öñõóßñá | Frissiras Museum ÐÑÏÓÙÐÏ | FACE 1990, ÔÝìðåñá óå ÷áñôß | Tempera on paper, 40x30cm Ìïõóåßï Öñõóßñá | Frissiras Museum ÐÑÏÓÙÐÏ | FACE 1990, ÔÝìðåñá óå ÷áñôß | Tempera on paper, 40x30cm Ìïõóåßï Öñõóßñá | Frissiras Museum ÐÑÏÓÙÐÏ | FACE 1990, ÔÝìðåñá óå ÷áñôß | Tempera on paper, 40x30cm ÉäéùôéêÞ óõëëïãÞ | Private collection
072 |
ÅÑÃÁËÅÉÁ | TOOLS 1980, ÔÝìðåñá óå ÷áñôß | Tempera on paper, 35x25cm ÌÇ×ÁÍÇÌÁ | MACHINE 1989, ÓéíéêÞ ìåëÜíç óå ÷áñôß | Indian ink on paper, 29x39cm
084 |
ÂÏÕÍÏ | MOUNTAIN 1998, ÔÝìðåñá óå ÷áñôß | Tempera on paper, 43x34cm ÊÔÉÓÌÁÔÁ | STRUCTURES 1999, ÔÝìðåñá óå ÷áñôß | Tempera on paper, 43x35cm ÉäéùôéêÞ óõëëïãÞ | Private collection ÂÏÕÍÏ | MOUNTAIN 1983, ÔÝìðåñá óå ÷áñôß | Tempera on paper, 36x58cm ÉäéùôéêÞ óõëëïãÞ | Private collection