1 minute read

Lauren Scholz

Next Article
Jeffrey H. Kahn

Jeffrey H. Kahn

McConnaughhay and Rissman Professor

J.D., HARVARD UNIVERSITY, 2014

Advertisement

B.A., YALE UNIVERSITY, 2009 Algorithms and Contract Law, in The Cambridge Handbook of the Law of Algorithms (Woodrow Barfield, editor) (Cambridge University Press 2020) Algorithmic Contracts and Consumer Privacy, in Smart Contracts and Block Chain Technology: Role of Contract Law (Larry DiMatteo, editor) (Cambridge University Press 2019) Toward a Consumer Contract Law for an Algorithmic Age, in Law and Autonomous Systems (Horst Eidenmueller, editor) (C.H. Beck 2019) Two Cheers for Cyborgs, 2022 U. Chi. L. Rev. Online _ (forthcoming 2022) Private Rights of Action in Privacy Law, 63 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 1639 (2022) Fiduciary Boilerplate: Locating Fiduciary Relationships in Information Age Transactions, 46 J. Corp. L. 143 (2020) Indivisibilities in Technology Regulation, 2020 U. Chi. L. Rev. Online 70

Big Data is Not Big Oil: The Role of Analogy in the Law of New Technologies, 86 Tenn. L. Rev. 863 (2019)

In The Significance of Private Rights of Action in Privacy Regulation, 63 William & mary laW revieW 1639 (2022), Professor Lauren Scholz contests the conventional wisdom that states the key to providing individuals with more privacy protection is strengthening the power government has to directly sanction actors that hurt privacy interests of citizens. The article argues that private rights of action are essential for privacy regulation and provides examples of how private rights of action can improve privacy regulation in a suite of key modern privacy problems.

This article is from: