BB75-p01-news:09/10
7/12/10
14:32
Page 1
Denis Kelly: The Stanjames.com CEO on what makes his company special
Denmark: How a complaint from slot operators has delayed online deregulation
John Samuel: The need to improve customer service after a mistake has been made
BETTING NEWS 4
iGAMING NEWS 12
COMMENT 33
Unlike Audley Harrison, the RGA has hit back at the growing claims that betting causes integrity issues for sports suggesting that the sporting authorities should address their own problems first. Andrew McCarron reports.
RGA hits back over sports integrity
INTEGRITY
The Remote Gambling Association has taken a swipe at the professionalism of sports following on from last month’s controversial title fight between David Haye and Audley Harrison. Addressing the RGA AGM, chief executive Clive Hawkswood highlighted Haye’s announcement at the end of the £12m bout that he ‘put a lot of money’ on stopping Harrison in the third round - a particularly worrying remark considering that not only is it against the sport’s rules to bet on a fight that you are involved in, but also that it appeared the WBA Heavyweight Champion could have won the bout earlier. Haye soon u-turned on his statement, though, saying he’d not had a bet personally. He
T
added: “It did feel like I’d bet on myself because a lot of people had put money on it, family members and what not. If it had gone into the fourth round I knew people would have lost a lot of money and I’d have felt a bit guilty.” Presumably, the people he knew would have lost a lot of money had he won in the first or second round as well - as it seems patently obvious he was capable of doing. However, Haye has not been censured by the sport’s regulator, the British Boxing Board of Control. Its secretary Robin Smith said: “Every year we send out the rules and regulations and if he’d have read it he’d have known. I think from what David has said, and I heard the interview live, I’m fairly happy that everything was okay.”
However, it is this laissezfaire approach from the regulator that has annoyed the gambling industry. Hawkswood commented: “The important point is not that the British Boxing Board of Control said it was ‘disappointed’ that Haye claimed not to know the rules. While it is okay sending its rules out, it needs to make sure that people actually read them. “This was for a World Title Fight and they didn’t think to check with the camps that they knew the rules. You’d could almost understand it if it was a small supporting fight, but this was a World Title Fight. It beggars belief.” Sports have linked betting with integrity issues in order to lobby for payments from bookmakers despite, in
Hawkswood’s words, being ‘hugely more wealthy than the gambling industry’. He also referenced recent controversies regarding members of FIFA and the IOC when suggesting that ‘people in glass houses should not throw stones’. Hawkswood revealed that some sports may have probity problems of their own making as Switzerland is reviewing whether its anti-corruption laws should apply to non-profit making organisations. Before now, most of the sporting authorities that are based there have been exempt. He added: “40 sports governing bodies are in Switzerland for tax reasons, so it’s a bit galling when sports accuse us of moving offshore.” RGA AGM Politics 14
ACTION IMAGES / ANDREW COULDRIDGE LIVEPIC
£5.20 (€8.30) • ISSUE:75 • DECEMBER 2010 • www.betting-business.co.uk
Stanleybet targets French retail monopoly FRANCE
uropean bookmaker Stanleybet has used the European Commission’s announcement that has closed the infringement procedure against the French online betting market to highlight the fact that inequalities still remain in retail betting in the country. Stanleybet launched legal proceedings in the French Council of State in 2009 following the failure of the French government to respond to an application for a sports betting licence lodged by Stanleybet in April 2009. The application requested the repeal of the law which granted an offline monopoly to Française des Jeux and also to allow Stanleybet to open an initial one hundred shops across France. The licence application remains unanswered. Stanleybet CEO John Whittaker commented: “The Commission’s action in pursuing France regarding the unlawful online restrictions and the resulting changes to the French online law demonstrate what can be achieved to improve consumer benefit and choice by resolute action: to this extent, the Commission’s efforts are to be applauded. However, let no one be under any illusion that the French gambling market is free of restrictions. The offline sports betting market remains off limits to all but national incumbent Française des Jeux - despite every effort by Stanleybet and others to seek a licence to operate in France.” He suggested that it would be ‘patently absurd’ to justify the continuing restrictions against offline operators on consumer protection grounds and added: “I call upon the European Commission to act speedily in order to remedy this injustice, by pressing France hard to bring its laws relating to offline sports betting in line with the online situation. There are also a small number of other Member States, including Greece and the Netherlands, which have similar unjustified restrictions in their offline betting markets, and we trust that action will also be taken against them.”
E
®
www.betstone.com