GEZHI HUANG LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE PORTFOLIO
EDUCATION September 2009 - June 2013 Bachelor Degree of Engineering in Landscape Architecture, Tongji University, Shanghai, China September 2014 - 2016 Candidate of Master of Landscape Architecture, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE July-September, 2015 Internship at HAPA Collaborative, Vancouver, Canada
Position : Summer Intern Project : Evergreen Line, Canada - Assist with Lighting/Planting/Construction Drawings, 3D Modelings, Plan/Section Renderings, Specification Documents Maple Ridge Feasibility Study, Canada - Assist with Plan Rendering
June-September, 2014 Internship at PFS Studio, Vancouver, Canada Info: gezhi.huang@mail.utoronto.ca 647 865 0864 79 Harbord, Toronto, ON, Canada
Position : Project Designer Project : Foshan Urban Design Competition, Guangdong, China - Assist with Construction Drawings, 3D Modelings, Plan/Section Renderings, Specification Documents
July-September, 2012 Internship at HDD, Shanghai, China
Position : Assistant to Landscape Architect Project : River Waterfronts Urban Design, Lanzhou, China Jinhui路Shengshi Tiancheng Residential Landscape Design, Xinjiang, China - Assist with case analysis and documented and produced plan and section design sketches .
June-July, 2011 Internship at XWHO, Hangzhou, China
Position: Assistant to Landscape Architect Project: Bridge Theme Park, Zhenzhou, China - Assist with park sign system design and case study, produce CAD drawings, models and design sketches.
ACADEMIC EXPERIENCE January-Present, 2016 Teaching Assistant at University of Toronto
SKILLS
Adobe Creative Suite, Sketch Up, AutoCAD, Rhino, RhinoCAM, Grasshopper, GIS, Laser Cut Model
4 10 16 22 34 36 46 STREET PARK REGIONAL PARK BERZCY PARK REVITALIZATION HIGH PARK DESIGN URBAN PERIPETEIA
RE-CONNECTION AFTER SEPERATION
MINE REHABILITATION URBAN DESIGN QUARRY MINE HOUSING PLAN ALLEN X-WAY SUPER STUDIO GRAVEL COMMUNE
P1 CASE STUDY+RATCHET+GROW P2 RETAIL/POCKET PARK+NEW RULES P3 UNFOLDED CITY
ENVIRONMENTAL MODULATIONS GARDEN DESIGN PHILLIP HOUSE RE-DESIGN BEE NEST ANALOG DESIGN URBAN NEST
HEALING GARDEN FOR COMMUNITY
OTHER WORK SITE TECHNOLOGY TOPOGRAPHIC REVEALS SAND-WOOD CHINESE GARDEN STEM RESEARCH
STREET PARK URBAN PERIPETEIA
A Reversal in Story with Reflection of Transition
11/2013-12/2013 | 1st SEMESTER MLA | BERZCY PARK | 5242 Sqm | TORONTO
4
K refelction of post-modern architecture
5
Context Analysis
Site Analysis
reflection from the oppos 4 corner-entrances
material material & facade
1802
time 2010s
1940s
time
people coming from different direction sense the change of the atmosphere and feature of architecture surround ingthe park. by creating reflection of buildings which has the opposite characteristics of where the viewers stand, the park would enhance the sudden reverse and perform to audiences an urban peripeteia. urban peripeteia. reverse and perform to audiences an park would enhance the sudden of where the viewers stands, the which has the opposite characteristic by creating refection of buildings
mid-point on north&south pedestrian
the park. and feture of architecture surround sense the change of the atmosphere people coming from different direction
height & proportion
mid-point west pedestrian
Intersection
landuse
Business Commercial
6
Commercial Business Art&Exhibition Residence
Residence Cafe&Restaurant Art Exhibition
activitie & flows
site side sight line reflection lines reflection area
7
E
t Fron
.E t S t Scot
St. n o t ling l e W
time sight building activity
t on
E . t
experience
S
Fr 8
N 10m
20m
50m
St
PROPOSED CONTOUR LINES
t. E
refelction of historical buildings refelction of gooderham buildings
9
RIGIONAL PARK RE-CONNECTION AFTER SEPERATION
Oak Savannah Regeneration
02/2014-04/2014 | 2 rd SEMESTER MLA | HIGH PARK | 1.61 Sqkm | TORONTO
10
11
12
13
14
15
Mining Rehabilitation Gravel Commune
Co-operative Housing Program
03/2015-04/2014 | Quarry Mine | 1.57Sqkm | Uxbridge, Canada
16
17
18
19
20
21
URBAN DESIGN P1 CASE STUDY+RATCHET+GROW P2 RETAIL/POCKET PARK TYPOLOGY+NEW RULES P3 UNFOLDED CITY 09/2014-12/2014 | 3 rd SEMESTER MLA | ALLEN EXPRESS-WAY | 7.51 Sqm | TORONTO
22
ALSO BE REVERSED TO BE ‘BUILT SPACE’ ACCORDING TO THE CONTRAST OF SCALE. THE FLEXIBILITY OF THE PRESENCE OF ‘OPEN SPACE’ IN THIS CASE BRINGS DYNAMIC IN THE ARRANGEMENT OF PROGRAM AND THE POSSIBILITY OF CREATING NEW TYPE OF
Merchandise Mart levels (x5)
International Trade Center level
Hotel Levels
FLOOR FIGURE GROUND 1:2000
INTERFACE OF “BUILT SPACE” AND “OPEN SPACE”
COLUMN GRID
23
200% OPEN SPACE RATCHET
50% FAR RATCHET
FAR GRADIENT RATCHET
TYPE D
TYPE C
PLACE BONAVENTURE, MONTREAL CASE STUDY
PLACE BONAVENTURE, MONTREAL GEZHI HUANG BY MULTIPLYING PARTS OF THE “BUILT SPACE” INSIDE THE MASSIVE STRUCTURE WITHOUT INCREASING FLOOR AREA “OPEN SPACE”, THE RATCHET HAS POSITIONS OF STATEMENT CREATED VARIETY OF VERTICAL CORE SPACE (ATRIUM), WHICH ACTHE CONCEPT OF ‘OPEN SPACE’ IN THE CASE OF PLACE BONAVENTUREPROVIDE COULD BE REDEFINED, SO DOES THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ‘INDOOR’ AND ‘OUTDOOR’ SPCAE. CESSIBILITY OF SIGHT LIGHT AND INTERACTIVE OPPORTUNITY BETWEEN DIFPROGRAMS AND VARIED FUNCTIONS THAT WERE TRADITIONALLY DISTRIBUTED IN URBAN SPACE ARE NOW INTEGRATED INTO A MASSIVE BUILDING WITH LITTLE OPEN FERENT LEVELS . SPACE IN BETWEEN. THE MODE OF CIRCULATION AND PUBLIC SPACE HAS BEEN 1:1000
Lower Shopping Level
C.N.R tracks
TYPE B
1:5000 CONTEXT GROUND TO SWITCHED FROM OPEN SPACE (STREET,FIGURE SQUARE,PATH...) ‘PUBLIC’ SPACE (INDOOR OPENSPACE).
St. Antoine St.
IN EACH “UNIT” THAT HAS BEENININSTALLED WITH OF THIS URBAN ENCLAVE, ‘OPEN SPACE’ATRIUM INCLUDES PUBLIC HAS PORTIONS THE OF LOBBY,FORM PEELEVATOR, CORRIDORS...BUT NOT EXISTS AS A FIXED SPACE, RATHER THAN “OPEN THAT ARE MORE DESTRIAN, TO STREETSCAPE THE IDEA OF 50% FARSPACE” RATCHET ASIMILAR INEXPLICIT AREA(SINCE ‘OPEN’ AND ‘BUILT’ HAS SAMESPACE. ATTRIBUTE AS INDOOR 50% FAR RATCHET FARTHE GRADIENT RATCHET SPACE). IT COULD BE AFFECTED BY THE SURFACE OF THE BOUNDARY (INSTALLED DOORS OR NOT) AS WELLIN AS THE (ON GOING EXHIBITION BOOTH). IT COULD RE-ASSEMBLYING URBAN CONFIGURATION A ACTIVITY MASSIVE BLOCK HAS BEEN INPOSITIONS STATEMENT ALSO BE REVERSED TO BE ‘BUILT SPACE’ ACCORDING TO THE CONTRAST OF SCALE. TENSIFIED. THE FLEXIBILITY OF THE PRESENCE OF ‘OPEN SPACE’ IN THIS CASE BRINGS DYNAMIC TYPE A
Metro Tunnel
200% FAR FAR RATCHET RATCHET 200% FAR RATCHET 200%
PLACE BONAVENTURE, MONTREAL
1:1000
GEZHI HUANG
BY MULTIPLYING PARTS OF THE “BUILT SPACE” INSIDE THE MASSIVE STRUCTURE WITHOUT INCREASING FLOOR AREA OF “OPEN SPACE”, THE RATCHET HAS CREATED VARIETY OF VERTICAL CORE SPACE (ATRIUM), WHICH PROVIDE ACCESSIBILITY OF SIGHT LIGHT AND INTERACTIVE OPPORTUNITY BETWEEN DIFFERENT LEVELS .
THE CONCEPT OF ‘OPEN SPACE’ IN THE CASE OF PLACE BONAVENTURE COULD BE REDEFINED, SO DOES THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ‘INDOOR’ AND ‘OUTDOOR’ SPCAE.
PROGRAMS AND VARIED FUNCTIONS THAT WERE TRADITIONALLY DISTRIBUTED IN URBAN SPACE ARE NOW INTEGRATED INTO A MASSIVE BUILDING WITH LITTLE OPEN SPACE IN BETWEEN. THE MODE OF CIRCULATION AND PUBLIC SPACE HAS BEEN SWITCHED FROM OPEN SPACE (STREET, SQUARE,PATH...) TO ‘PUBLIC’ SPACE (INDOOR OPENSPACE).
IN THE ARRANGEMENT OF PROGRAM AND THE POSSIBILITY OF CREATING NEW TYPE OF Lower Shopping Level
200% O 200% OPEN SPA
Merchandise Mart levels (x5)
IN EACH INSTALLED WITH ATRIUM HAS THE FORM OF Upper Shopping Level“UNIT” THAT HAS BEEN Exhibition Hall Level
IN THE 50% FAR THE STRATEGIES INCLUDES THE SAME FROM 200%(BY MULTIPLYING PARTS OF THE “BUILT SPACE”), AS WELL AS CARVING CERTAIN FLOOR AREA TO FORM CORE SPACE. BOTH FAR CASE HAS SIMILAR SPACE FEATURE. “OPEN SPACE” THAT ARE MORE SIMILAR TO STREETSCAPE SPACE. THE IDEA OF RE-ASSEMBLYING URBAN CONFIGURATION IN A MASSIVE BLOCK HAS BEEN INTENSIFIED. IN THE 50% FAR THE STRATEGIES INCLUDES THE SAME FROM 200%(BY MULTIPLYING PARTS OF THE “BUILT SPACE”), AS WELL AS CARVING CERTAIN FLOOR AREA TO FORM CORE SPACE. BOTH FAR CASE HAS SIMILAR SPACE FEATURE.
IN THIS URBAN ENCLAVE, ‘OPEN SPACE’ INCLUDES PUBLIC PORTIONS OF LOBBY, PEDESTRIAN, ELEVATOR, CORRIDORS...BUT NOT EXISTS AS A FIXED SPACE, RATHER THAN A INEXPLICIT AREA(SINCE THE ‘OPEN’ AND ‘BUILT’ HAS SAME ATTRIBUTE AS INDOOR SPACE). IT COULD BE AFFECTED BY THE SURFACE OF THE BOUNDARY (INSTALLED DOORS OR NOT) AS WELL AS THE ACTIVITY (ON GOING EXHIBITION BOOTH). IT COULD ALSO BE REVERSED TO BE ‘BUILT SPACE’ ACCORDING TO THE CONTRAST OF SCALE. THE FLEXIBILITY OF THE PRESENCE OF ‘OPEN SPACE’ IN THIS CASE BRINGS DYNAMIC IN THE ARRANGEMENT OF PROGRAM AND THE POSSIBILITY OF CREATING NEW TYPE OF
Merchandise Mart levels (x5)
International Trade Center level
Hotel Levels
FLOOR FIGURE GROUND 1:2000 TYPE C
TYPE D TYPE D
1:1000 1 1000
TYPE C TYPE C
1:1000 1:1000 C.N.R tracks
TYPE D
St. Antoine St.
INTERFACE OF “BUILT SPACE” AND “OPEN SPACE”
TYPE C
TYPE C C.N.R tracks C.N.R tracks
INTERFACE OF “BUILT SPACE” AND “OPEN SPACE”
TYPE B TYPE B
St. Antoine St. St. Antoine St.
COLUMN GRID
C.N.R tracks
TYPE A TYPE A
1:1000 1 1000
1:1000 1:1000
Metro Tunnel Metro Tunnel
TYPE B
TYPE A
1:1000
Metro Tunnel
50% FAR FAR RATCHET RATCHET 50%
M
FAR GRADIENT GRADIENT RATCHET RATCHET FAR
50% OPEN SPACE
BY MULTIPLYING PARTS OF THE “BUILT SPACE” INSIDE THE MASSIVE STRUCBY MULTIPLYING PARTS OF THE “BUILT SPACE” INSIDE THE MASSIVE STRUCTURE WITHOUT INCREASING FLOOR AREA OF “OPEN SPACE”, THE RATCHET HAS TURE WITHOUT INCREASING FLOOR AREA OF “OPEN SPACE”, THE RATCHET HAS CREATED VARIETY OF VERTICAL CORE SPACE (ATRIUM), WHICH PROVIDE ACCREATED VARIETY OF VERTICAL CORE SPACE (ATRIUM), WHICH PROVIDE ACCESSIBILITY OF SIGHT LIGHT AND INTERACTIVE OPPORTUNITY BETWEEN DIFCESSIBILITY OF SIGHT LIGHT AND INTERACTIVE OPPORTUNITY BETWEEN DIFFERENT LEVELS . FERENT LEVELS .
1:1000
IN EACH “UNIT” THAT HAS BEEN INSTALLED WITH ATRIUM HAS THE FORM OF IN EACH “UNIT” THAT HAS BEEN INSTALLED WITH ATRIUM HAS THE FORM OF “OPEN SPACE” THAT ARE MORE SIMILAR TO STREETSCAPE SPACE. THE IDEA OF “OPEN SPACE” THAT ARE MORE SIMILAR TO STREETSCAPE SPACE. THE IDEA OF RE-ASSEMBLYING URBAN CONFIGURATION IN A MASSIVE BLOCK HAS BEEN INRE-ASSEMBLYING URBAN CONFIGURATION IN A MASSIVE BLOCK HAS BEEN INTENSIFIED. TENSIFIED. IN THE 50% FAR THE STRATEGIES INCLUDES THE SAME FROM 200%(BY MULTIIN THE 50% FAR THE STRATEGIES INCLUDES THE SAME FROM 200%(BY MULTIPLYING PARTS OF THE “BUILT SPACE”), AS WELL AS CARVING CERTAIN FLOOR PLYING PARTS OF THE “BUILT SPACE”), AS WELL AS CARVING CERTAIN FLOOR AREA TO FORM CORE SPACE. BOTH FAR CASE HAS SIMILAR SPACE FEATURE. AREA TO FORM CORE SPACE. BOTH FAR CASE HAS SIMILAR SPACE FEATURE.
C.N.R tracks St. Antoine St. TYPE C TYPE C
TYPE B
1:1000 1 1000 1 1000 1:1000
TYPE A
1:1000
Metro Tunnel
C.N.R tracks St. Antoine St.
C.N.R tracks C.N.R tracks
24
TYPE B
C.N.R trac
St. Antoine St. St. Antoine St.
TYPE B TYPE B Metro Tunnel Metro Tunnel
1:1000 1:1000
TYPE A
TYPE A TYPE A
Metro Tunnel
INTO ONE CONTINUOUS VERTICAL STRUCTURE WITH LARGE FOOT PRINT, WHILE MAINTAINING THE CONNECTION WITH URBAN COMPONENTS IN MULTIPLE LEVELS(UNDERGROUND\STREET LEVEL AND UPPER LEVELS, CONNECTE THROUGH CORRIDOR, TRAIN TRACK, EXPRESSWAY, SUBWAY, STREET ENTRANCE, ETC.) TO INTEGRATE URBAN FABRIC INTO THIS MEGA- BLOCK
OPEN SPACE’ IN THE CASE OF PLACE BONAVENTURE COULD BE RETHE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ‘INDOOR’ AND ‘OUTDOOR’ SPCAE. 1:5000
CONTEXT FIGURE GROUND C.N.R tracks
ARIED FUNCTIONS THAT WERE TRADITIONALLY DISTRIBUTED IN NOW INTEGRATED INTO A MASSIVE BUILDING WITH LITTLE OPEN . THE MODE OF CIRCULATION AND PUBLIC SPACE HAS BEEN PEN SPACE (STREET, SQUARE,PATH...) TO ‘PUBLIC’ SPACE (INDOOR
Lower Shopping Level
St. Antoine St.
Upper Shopping Level
PUBLIC
P1
TYPE C
TO CREATE MULTIVARIANT URBAN SURFACE WITH VARIOUS DEGREE OF OPENESS AND MULTIPLE FUNCTION
Exhibition Hall Level 1:1000
GROW
TYPE B
PRIVATE
Place Bonaventure
1:1000
+ Recreational/Leisure
CLAVE, ‘OPEN SPACE’ INCLUDES PUBLIC PORTIONS OF LOBBY, PEOR, CORRIDORS...BUT NOT EXISTS AS A FIXED SPACE, RATHER THAN SINCE THE ‘OPEN’ AND ‘BUILT’ HAS Metro SAME ATTRIBUTE Tunnel AS INDOOR BE AFFECTED BY THE SURFACE OF THE BOUNDARY (INSTALLED WELL AS THE ACTIVITY (ON GOING EXHIBITION BOOTH). IT COULD D TO BE ‘BUILT SPACE’ ACCORDING TO THE CONTRAST OF SCALE.
AS WELL AS OTHER URBAN TRANSPORTS
TYPE A
1:1000
THE PRESENCE OF ‘OPEN SPACE’ IN THIS CASE BRINGS DYNAMIC ENTUpper OF PROGRAM THE POSSIBILITY OF Exhibition CREATINGHall NEW TYPE OF ShoppingAND Level Level
EN SPACE RATCHET
Merchandise Mart levels (x5)
RECREATIONAL/LEISUREC ONFIGURATION IS INSERTED INTO THE STRUCTURE IN MULTIPLE LEVELS IN THE FORM OF ONE 1:1000 BLOCK WHICH CONNECT PROGRAM SPACE SURROUNDING THEM BY THE CARVING OF ATRIUM/INCREASE OF PERIPHERAL OPEN SPACE.
C.N.R tracks
International Trade Center level
Hotel Levels
TO CREATE MULTIVARIANT St. Antoine St.URBAN SURFACE WITH VARIOUS DEGREE OF OPENESS AND MULTIPLE FUNCTION Metro Tunnel
USE COLUMN GRID AS MODULE TO FIT IN DIFFERENT URBAN CONFIGURATION/PROGRAM CONTEXT SECTION
1:1000
OPEN SPACE GRADIENT RACHET C.N.R tracks
FIGURE GROUND
1:5000
St. Antoine St.
FLOOR FIGURE GROUND 1:2000
TYPE B
TYPE A
Metro Tunnel
IDEOLOGICAL PRINCIPLES
1:1000
A
1:1000
IT COULD BE CONCEIVED AS A PROCESS OF INSERTION+EXTHE DESIGN INTEGRATE VARIETY OF FUNCTION AND SPACE OF BU INTO ONE CONTINUOUS VERTICAL STRUCTURE WITH LARGE FOOT OPEN SPACE GRADIENT RACHET 50% OPEN RATCHET CAVATION, AS ISSPACE OPERATED IN THE RATCHET. ON BY THEINSERTING LEVEL OPEN SPACE IS INCREASED OPEN SPACE IN BETWEEN DIFFERENT MAINTAINING THE CONNECTION WITH URBAN COMPONENTS IN M CIRCULATION METRICS USE COLUMN GRID AS MODULE TO FIT IN DIFFERENT URBAN CONECTED TO STREET QUARE OPEN SPACE OPEN SPACE IS INCREASED BY INSERTING OPEN SPACE IN BETWEEN DIFFERENT ELS(UNDERGROUND\STREET LEVEL AND UPPER LEVELS, CONNEC 1:1000 LEVEL,FORMS ALSOABY CARVING FLOORTHAT AREACONFIGURATION/PROGRAM (OF “OPEN SPACE” AS WELL AS SOME LEVEL, ALSO BY CARVING FLOOR FARAREA (OF “OPEN SPACE” AS WELL AS SOME CORRIDOR, TRAIN TRACK, EXPRESSWAY, SUBWAY, STREET ENTRA COULD FUNCTION AS A STAGE/RINK/LARGE GATHERING “BUILTELEVATOR SPACE”) TO CONNECT OPEN SPACE IN DIFFERENT LEVELS. THE STRATEINTEGRATE URBAN FABRIC INTO THIS M GIES INCLUDE MANIPULATING VARIOUS AMOUNT OF FLOOR AREA TAKEN OUT TO “BUILT SPACE”) TO CONNECT OPEN SPACE IN DIFFERENT LEVELS. THE STRATESPACE. TWO LARGE STEPS/STAIRS IN TWO SIDES CONNECT CREATE SEVERAL TYPE OF OPEN SPACE: PLAZA, CORRIDOR OR FRAGMENTED DENSITY FREIGHT ELEVATOR GATHERING SPACE... INCLUDE VARIOUS AMOUNT OF FLOOR AREA TAKEN OUT TO IT TO THE UPPERGIES LEVEL WHICH ISMANIPULATING A NEW LEVEL INSERTED UTILIZE OVER TRACK AIR SPACE TO CREATE MULTIFUNCTIONAL IDEOLOGICAL PRINCIPLES Building Program Metrics THE AXIOM REMAINS THE URBAN SAME MASIVE ESCALATOR SEVERAL TYPE OF OPEN CORRIDOR OR FRAGMENTED TO BE FUNCTIONCREATE AS SPORTS/PLAZA/GATHERING SPACE,SPACE: PLAZA, WHILE THE DYNAMIC AND TYPE OF OPEN SPACE/CIRCULATION ARE INETC. THE ATRIUM CONTINUE TOSPACE... THE EXHIBITION LEVEL, TOGATHERING URBAN TRANSPORT TENSIFIED.THE IDEA OF BRINGING IN CIRCULATION METRICS DIFFERENT URBAN CONFIGURATION GETHER WITH A OUTDOORN TERRAIN. THOSE NEW “OPEN HAS BEEN STRENGHTENED BY CONGROW FAR SIDERING OPEN SPACE AS A SIGNIFI+ Recreational/Leisure C.N.R tracks SPACE” ADDED WILL HAVE ACCESSIBILE SUN LIGHT , AS ELEVATOR CANT PORTION OF URBAN FORM RECREATIONAL/LEISUREC ONFIGURATION IS INSERTEDCONINTO (WHILE THE CONVENTIONAL St. Antoine St. WELL AS DIRECT SIGHT LINE INTERACTED WITH DIFFERENT THE REMAINS STRUCTURE IN MULTIPLE THESAME FORM ONE DENSITY CEPT OFLEVELS OPEN IN SPACE HAS OF MORE THE AXIOM THE FREIGHT ELEVATOR BLOCK WHICH CONNECT PROGRAM SPACE SURROUNDING AMBIGUOUS FORM COMPARED TO CONSIDER CIRCULATION SYSTEM AS “OPEN SPACE” TO MAKE THE THEM THE CARVING OF ATRIUM/INCREASE OF PERIPHERUTILIZE OVER TRACK AIR SPACE TO BY CREATE MULTIFUNCTIONAL LEVELS. BUILT SPACE). SPACE. Building Program Metrics MEGA STRUCTURE WHILE THEAL OPEN DYNAMIC AND TYPE OF FUNCTION AS WHOLE
OPEN ACE RATCHETSPACE RATCHET
50% OPEN SPACE RATCHET
GROW
C.N.R tracks
St. Antoine St.
Metro Tunnel
Within Site Street included
International Trade Center level
Hotel Levels
4.36 6.36
741290 - 834523 people per sqm
FLOOR FIGURE GROUND 1:2000
BUILDING PROGRAM METRICS
OFFICE [43.68%]
Within Site Street included
4.36 6.36
COMMERCIAL [33.49%] CIVIC [10.16%]
741290 - 834523 people per sqm
PARKING [9.77%]
BUILDING PROGRAM METRICS
ESCALATOR
INTERFACE OF “BUILT SPACE” AND “OPEN SPACE”
COLUMN GRID
OPEN SPACE/CIRCULATION ARE INTHE “BUILT SPACE” THAT ARE CARVED OUT WOULD BE TENSIFIED.THEGROW IDEA OF BRINGING IN MADE UP BY INTERIOR SPACE ADDED ON THE NEW LEVEL AS DIFFERENT URBAN CONFIGURATION COMMERCIAL/LEISURE FACILITY SPACE. HAS BEEN STRENGHTENED BY CONMEGA STRUCTURE FUNCTIONOPEN AS WHOLE SPACE AS A SIGNIFISIDERING ONE BLOCK WITH LOGICAL CORRELATION CANT PORTION OF URBAN FORM (WHILE THE CONVENTIONAL CONCEPT OF OPEN SPACE HAS MORE AMBIGUOUS FORM COMPARED TO TYPE C STACKINGBUILT PROGRAMSSPACE). TAKEN FROM URBAN COMPONENTS IN ONE BLOCK WITH LOGICAL CORRELATION URBAN TRANSPORT
OFFICE [43.68%]
TYPE C
COMMERCIAL [33.49%] CIVIC [10.16%]
PARKING [9.77%]
OPEN SPACE [2.55%]
Open space Program Metrics
1:1000
S Subway Tunnel
Expressway
Train Track
St. Antoine St.
Metro Tunnel
1:1000
Metro Tunnel
Expressway
1:1000
C.N.R tracks
C.N.R tracks
THE “BUILT SPACE” THAT ARE CARVED OUT WOULD BE MADE UP BY INTERIOR SPACE ADDED ON THE NEW LEVEL AS COMMERCIAL/LEISURE FACILITY SPACE.
SEMI-PUBLIC [62.31%]
St. Antoine St.
St. Antoine St.
Metro Tunnel
STREET [25.57%]
1:1000
Metro Tunnel
PRIVATE [12.11%]
St. Antoine St.
METRICS
TYPE B
200% FAR RATCHET
TYPE A
Metro Tunnel
1:1000
CAVATION, AS IS OPERATED IN THE RATCHET. ON THE LEVEL
STREET THAT [25.57%] THE “BUILT SPACE” CARVED OUT WOULDOPEN BE SPACE THAT CONECTED TOARE STREET FORMS A QUARE FUNCTION A STAGE/RINK/LARGE GATHERING MADE UP BYCOULD INTERIOR SPACE AS ADDED ON THE NEW LEVEL AS PRIVATE [12.11%] SPACE. TWOFACILITY LARGE STEPS/STAIRS IN TWO SIDES CONNECT COMMERCIAL/LEISURE SPACE.
Street Tunnel
Train Track
1:1000
IT COULD BE CONCEIVED AS A PROCESS OF INSERTION+EXOpenAS space Program IN Metrics CAVATION, IS OPERATED THE RATCHET. Metro ON THE Tunnel LEVEL CONECTED TO STREET FORMS A QUARE OPEN SPACE THAT COULD FUNCTION AS A STAGE/RINK/LARGE GATHERING SSubway Tunnel Recreational/Leisure SPACE. TWO+LARGE STEPS/STAIRS IN TWO SIDES CONNECT IT TO THE UPPER LEVEL WHICH IS A NEW LEVEL INSERTED RECREATIONAL/LEISUREC ONFIGURATION IS INSERTED INTO Street Tunnel TO BE FUNCTION AS SPORTS/PLAZA/GATHERING SPACE, THE STRUCTURE IN MULTIPLE LEVELS IN THE FORM OF ONE ETC. THE ATRIUM TO THE PROGRAM EXHIBITION LEVEL, TOBLOCKCONTINUE WHICH CONNECT SPACE SURROUNDING GETHER WITHTHEM A OUTDOORN TERRAIN. THOSE NEW “OPENOF PERIPHERBY THE CARVING OF ATRIUM/INCREASE C.N.R tracks SPACE” ADDED WILL SPACE. HAVE ACCESSIBILE SUN LIGHT , AS AL OPEN St. Antoine St. WELL AS DIRECTSEMI-PUBLIC SIGHT[62.31%] LINE INTERACTED WITH DIFFERENT CONSIDER CIRCULATION SYSTEM AS “OPEN SPACE” TO MAKE THE 1:1000 LEVELS. IT COULD BE CONCEIVED AS A PROCESSSTACKING OF INSERTION+EXPROGRAMS TAKEN FROM URBAN COMPONENTS IN
IT TO THE UPPER LEVEL WHICH IS A NEW LEVEL INSERTED TO BE FUNCTION AS SPORTS/PLAZA/GATHERING SPACE, ETC. THE ATRIUM CONTINUE TO THE EXHIBITION LEVEL, TOGETHER WITH A OUTDOORN TERRAIN. THOSE NEW “OPEN SPACE” ADDED WILL HAVE ACCESSIBILE SUN LIGHT , AS WELL AS DIRECT SIGHT LINE INTERACTED WITH DIFFERENT LEVELS.
C.N.R tracks
COLUMN GRID
OPEN SPACE [2.55%]
URBAN MASIVE
1:1000
FAR 7.53
DENSITY
OPEN SPACE GRADIENT RACHET
E RATCHET
OPEN SPACE IS INCREASED BY INSERTING OPEN SPACE IN BETWEEN DIFFERENT LEVEL, ALSO BY CARVING FLOOR AREA (OF “OPEN SPACE” AS WELL AS SOME “BUILT SPACE”) TO CONNECT OPEN SPACE IN DIFFERENT LEVELS. THE STRATEGIES INCLUDE MANIPULATING VARIOUS AMOUNT OF FLOOR AREA TAKEN OUT TO CREATE SEVERAL TYPE OF OPEN SPACE: PLAZA, CORRIDOR OR FRAGMENTED GATHERING SPACE... THE AXIOM REMAINS THE SAME WHILE THE DYNAMIC AND TYPE OF OPEN SPACE/CIRCULATION ARE INTENSIFIED.THE IDEA OF BRINGING IN DIFFERENT URBAN CONFIGURATION HAS BEEN STRENGHTENED BY CONSIDERING OPEN SPACE AS A SIGNIFICANT PORTION OF URBAN FORM (WHILE THE CONVENTIONAL CONCEPT OF OPEN SPACE HAS MORE AMBIGUOUS FORM COMPARED TO BUILT SPACE).
1000000 - 124523 people per sqkm Building Program Metrics
METRICS
Open space Program Metrics OPEN SPACES PROGRAM METRICS
METRICS
200% FAR RATCHET FAR 7.53
CIRCULATION
OFFICE [43.68%]
DENSITY
200% FAR RATCHET
1000000 - 124523 people per sqkm
FAR
CIVIC [10.16%]
STR STREET LEVEL
Open space Program Metrics OPEN SPACES PROGRAM METRICS
7.53
ELEVATOR
PRIVATE [12.11%]
200% OPEN SPACE RATCHET
GROW
OFFICE [43.68%]
DENSITY
FAR
SEMI-PUBLIC [62.31%]
3.77
1000000 - 124523 people per sqkm
DENSITY
[10.16%] 801290 - 854523 peopleCIVIC per sqkm
Open space Program Metrics OPEN SPACES PROGRAM METRICS
FAR 4.20
STREET [25.57%]
PARKING [9.77%] PRIVATE [12.11%] OPEN SPACE [2.55%] OPEN SPACES PROGRAM METRICS
Open space Program Metrics
GROW
FAR
FAR SEMI-PUBLIC 941290 - 1034523 people per sqkm[45%]
801290 - 854523 people per sqkm
Building Program Metrics
BUILDING PROGRAM METRICS COMMERCIAL [33%]
Open space Program Metrics OPEN SPACES PROGRAM METRICS
741290 - 834523 people
URBAN TRANSPORT
OFFICE [35%]
DENSITY
DENSITY
OFFICE [33%]
DENSITY
ESCALATOR
Open space Program Metrics OPEN SPACES PROGRAM METRICS
4.20
SEMI-PUBLIC [46%]
Within Site Street included
Building Program M BUILDING PROGRAM METRICS
941290 - 1034523 people per sqkm Building Program Metrics BUILDING PROGRAM METRICS
200% OPEN SPACE RATCHET 3.77
FREIGHT ELEVATOR
STR STREET LEVEL
DENSITY
COMMERCIAL [33.49%]
Building Program Metrics BUILDING PROGRAM METRICS
FAR
STREET [25.57%]
PARKING [9.77%] OPEN SPACE [2.55%]
Building Program Metrics
METRICS
SEMI-PUBLIC [62.31%]
Building Program Metrics COMMERCIAL [33.49%]
Building Program Metrics BUILDING PROGRAM METRICS
Open space Program Metrics OPEN SPACES PROGRAM METRICS
COMMERCIAL OFFICE
OFFICE [43.68%]
COMMERCIAL [38%]
CIVIC [7%]
CIVIC
CIVIC [7%]
PARKING [5%]
C.N.R tracks
PUBLIC [42%]
PARKING [5%] SEMI-PUBLIC [46%]
RECREATIONAL
OPEN SPACE [15%] OFFICE [35%]
PRIVATE [12.11%]
OPEN SPACE [22%]
PUBLIC [43%]
PRIVATE [12%]
OFFICE [33%]
St. Antoine St. OFFICE [43.68%]
SEMI-PUBLIC [45%]
COMMERCIAL OFFICE
COMMERCIAL [33%]
COMMERCIAL [38%]
COMMERCIAL [3 CIVIC [10.16%]
CIVIC [7%]
PUBLIC [42%]
TYPE B
cks
SEMI-PUBLIC [62.31%]
Metro Tunnel
TYPE A
COMMERCIAL [33.49%] CIVIC [10.16%]
PRIVATE [12.11%]
PARKING [5%]
OPEN SPACE [15%]
PUBLIC [43%]
RECREATIONAL
STREET [25.57%]
PARKING [9.77%
OPEN SPACE [2.5
PRIVATE [12%]
STR STREET LEVEL
St. Antoine St.
Metro Tunnel
OPEN SPACE [22%]
CIVIC
CIVIC [7%]
PARKING [5%]
25
Open space Progra S Subway Tunnel
26
P2
27
28
P3
29
30
31
Blow Up Block Typology
Subway - Highway Circulation through Section Cut
32
Subway - Parking Circulation through Section Cut
Subway - Bridge Circulation through Section Cut
Subway - Highway Circulation through Section Cut
33
ENVIRONMENTAL MODULATIONS URBAN NEST
BEE NEST ANALOG DESIGN
09/2014-12/2014 | Grow-op Exhibition Installation | 3rd Semester MLA |
34
35
GARDEN DESIGN COMMUNITY HEALING
PHILLIP HOUSE GARDEN RE-DESIGN
09/2015-12/2015 | PHILLIP HOUSE COMPETITION | NORTH YORK YOUTH HEALTH CARE PROJECT | TORONTO | Collaborative Work
CROSS-SECTION
LONGITUDE-SECTION
36
37
VIEW FROM NORTH-WEST ADDITION
38
39
OTHER WORKS Bench Re-design| Site Technology
40
41
Harthouse Farm| Topographic Reveals Millboard Model
42
Negative Plaster Cast
43
Sand-Wood|Cell Division
44
45
Pa Ta Shan Ren|Chinese Gareden
46
Svringa Vulgaris|Stem Research
47
THANKS FOR VIEWING!
48