30th Anniversary: Turning Points
JUNE 10 - 24 | 2023
Welcome to the 2023 Great Lakes Chamber Music Festival!
This year’s festival marks our 30th season, and in recognition of this milestone, I am delighted to offer you a program which is celebratory, eclectic and, at times, deeply personal to me.
I am writing this letter at home, in New York, looking out at an imposing larch tree, which overshadows our house and is just beginning to show its young spring leaves. Almost exactly 10 years ago, our family prepared to leave our life in London and begin a new chapter in the United States. As winter turned to spring in the UK, I think we were all aware that we were at a turning point. Moving to another country with my wife and young daughters has certainly been one of the most significant events I have experienced and has taken me in unanticipated directions. I knew that I was going to replace David Finckel as cellist of the Emerson String Quartet, but beyond that I did not know what to expect. One of the happiest surprises that came shortly after our arrival was an invitation from Maury Okun and Michael Morin to lead the Great Lakes Chamber Music Festival, following James Tocco’s retirement. I could never have imagined such an opportunity, but after 9 years as Artistic Director, I can’t believe my luck.
Please forgive me for waxing nostalgic, but I wanted to share with you the inspiration for this year’s theme, Turning Points. I am at a moment of looking forward and looking back. In this season, I look forward to new collaborations, and look back on my life-changing time with the Emerson String Quartet. The extraordinary roster of artists that we have gathered together is too lengthy to list here – just leaf through the program book and you will discover a feast of musicians, all of whom I am thrilled to welcome to the festival.
I extend my thanks, respect and enormous admiration to all of you who have supported the Great Lakes Chamber Music Festival and enabled it to flourish over the last 30 years.
Warmly,
Paul Watkins Artistic DirectorArtistic Director
Paul Watkins
Artistic Director emeritus
James Tocco
shouse institute Director
Philip Setzer
chAirs
Virginia & Michael Geheb, Board Chairs
Marguerite Munson Lentz
Janelle McCammon & Raymond Rosenfeld
BoArD of Directors
Kathleen Block
Nicole Braddock
Cathleen Corken
Christine Goerke
Robert D. Heuer
Michael Leib
Judith Greenstone Miller
Gail & Ira Mondry
Bridget & Michael Morin
Frederick Morsches & Kareem George
Sandi & Claude Reitelman
Randolph Schein
Franziska Schoenfeld
Lauren Smith
Jill & Steven Stone
Rev. Msgr. Anthony Tocco
Michael Turala
Gwen & S. Evan Weiner
ex-officio memBers
Cantor Rachel Gottlieb Kalmowitz
Rabbi Mark Miller
Maury Okun
trustee ADvisory committee
Cecilia Benner
Linda & Maurice Binkow
Cindy & Harold Daitch
Lillian Dean
Nathalie Doucet
Afa Dworkin
Adrienne & Herschel Fink
Jackie Paige-Fischer & David Fischer
Barbara & Paul Goodman
Barbara Heller
Fay B. Herman
William Hulsker
Rayna Kogan
Martha Pleiss
Kristin Ross
Marc Schwartz
Josette Silver
Isabel & Lawrence Smith
Kimberley & Victor Talia
James Tocco
Beverly & Barry Williams
stAff Administration
Maury Okun, President & CEO
Jennifer Laredo Watkins, Director of Artistic Planning
Community Engagement
Jainelle Robinson, Community Engagement Officer
Development
Jocelyn (Zelasko) Conselva, Development Officer
Priya Mohan, Grants & Communications Manager
Gramm Drennen, Development & Patron Engagement Associate
Marketing
Bridget Favre, Director of Marketing
Rob Hall, Multimedia Marketing Associate
Sabrina Rosneck, Marketing Associate
Lauren Cichocki, Marketing Associate
Lei Min, Arts Administration Intern
Finance
Triet Huynh, Controller
Phuong Huynh, Finance Assistant
Operations
Chloe Tooson, Artistic Operations Manager
Lane Warren, Arts Administration Associate
Emily Mastenbrook, Arts Administration Intern
founDing memBers
Wendy & Howard Allenberg
Kathleen & Joseph Antonini
Toni & Corrado Bartoli
Margaret & William Beauregard
Nancy & Lee Browning
Nancy & Christopher Chaput
Julie & Peter Cummings
Aviva & Dean Friedman
Patricia & Robert Galacz
Rose & Joseph Genovesi
Elizabeth & James Graham
Susan & Graham Hartrick
Linda & Arnold Jacob
Rosemary Joliat
Penni & Larry LaBute
Emma & Michael Minasian
Beverly & Thomas Moore
Dolores & Michael Mutchler
Nancy & James Olin
Helen & Leo Peterson
Marianne & Alan Schwartz
Leslie Slatkin
Sandra & William Slowey
Wilda Tiffany
Rev. Msgr. Anthony Tocco
Debbie & John Tocco
Georgia & Gerald Valente
Thelma & Ganesh Vattyham
Nancy & Robert Vlasic
Gwen & S. Evan Weiner
Barbara & Gary Welsh
sPeciAL thAnKs to
Lynne Dorando Hans, Graphic Design
Peter Laki, Program Notes
THANK YOU TO OUR SPONSORS AND FUNDERS OF THE 2023 GREAT LAKES CHAMBER MUSIC FESTIVAL
senghor
reiD: EvEry Night DrEams 5
Artist statement: turning Points
“Focusing on gratitude, courage, and radical introspection has provided me with the space to expand the focus of my artistic practice and creativity. I often use my interactions with nature, specifically water, as a vehicle for reflection, healing, and restorative practice. Specifically using water as a subject matter often provides me with multiple pathways for attaining higher levels of personal awakening. Water is a turning point, a shapeshifter, always evolving out of itself and back into itself. It is still and in motion, reflective and transparent, pure, and polluted. I intend for the subsequent narrative created by my work to inspire viewers to willingly engage water and evoke consideration of it as a sacred treasure and catalyst for enlightenment. My goal is to provide a series of visual devices to facilitate the reintegration of our most important natural resource into our daily living and discourse.”
our mission
Great Lakes Chamber Music Festival brings together the world’s finest musicians to offer extraordinary musical performances and experiences. We celebrate, preserve and advance the intimate musical dialogue that is unique to chamber music through performance and education, enhancing the cultural environment of the Great Lakes Region for generations to come.
SATurdAy, JuNE 10 | 7:30 pm
ADvEnturEs in HArMOny
Kerrytown Concert House
Sponsored by Pearl Planning
ALESSIO BAx, piano
TESSA LARK, violin
NATHAN STARK, bass-baritone
PELIA STRING QUARTET, Shouse ensemble
prOgrAm
Béla Bartók string Quartet no. 3, sz. 85 (1881-1945)
Prima parte: Moderato
Seconda parte: Allegro
Ricapitolazione della prima parte: Moderato
Coda: Allegro molto
Pelia String Quartet
Ludwig van Beethoven Der Kuß (The Kiss), Op. 128 (1770-1827) Die Ehre Gottes aus der Natur (The Glory of God in Nature) from Six Songs, Op. 48
Erlkönig (The Erl King), WoO 131 (based on Beethoven’s sketches and reconstructed by Cees Nieuwenhuizen)
Bax, Stark
franz schubert Der Atlas from Schwanengesang, D. 957 (1797-1828) Prometheus, D. 674
Bax, Stark
intErMissiOn
Alan hankers Elapse (WorLD Premiere) (b. 1992) Pelia String Quartet
césar franck sonata for violin and Piano in A major (1822-90)
Allegretto ben moderato
Allegro molto
Recitativo-Fantasia: Ben moderato
Allegretto poco mosso
Bax, Lark
prOgrAm NOTES
Béla
Bartók: string Quartet no. 3 (1927)
The third and fourth of Bartók’s six string quartets represent the acme of the composer’s modernism. At first hearing, the listener may well be engaged by the highly advanced harmonic and rhythmic idiom of these works. Yet the folk-music influence, so important in Bartók’s music, is never far from the surface. For all its “modernity,” the Third Quartet is full of references (some veiled, some more overt) to Hungarian folk music. Bartók’s strategy consists in using only one parameter of his sources at a time: he will either quote a typical pentatonic cadence from Hungarian folk music (G - C - A) without the rest of the tune, or use a melodic structure derived from folk music, but filled out by markedly non-folkloric pitch material. In this way, the traditional and non-traditional elements of his style are seamlessly fused.
The Third Quartet is in a single movement but is divided into four clearly demarcated segments. A slow Prima parte and a fast Seconda parte are followed by a varied recapitulation of Part I and a coda based on Part II. The Prima parte is a masterful example of “organic growth”: a complex and variegated movement arises from two or three tiny motifs that are themselves interrelated. One of the most important moments comes at the end of the section, where these tiny motifs coalesce into a long, pentatonic musical phrase (played by the second violin and the viola). The Seconda parte brings together a string of themes in various dance meters, both symmetrical and asymmetrical. The dance becomes more and more excited; the themes are developed in contrapuntal imitation, almost as if the dancers tripped over one another. The end of the section was best characterized by Hungarian musicologist János Kárpáti, in his book Bartók’s Chamber Music: “The composer’s ‘scalpel’ continues to strip off the thematic and motivic layers—penetrating right down to the ‘skeleton’ of the themes.” This is followed by the return of the slow tempo (Ricapitulazione della prima parte) in which the short motifs of the work’s opening are “reconfigured” to form a completely new musical entity. Finally, the Coda presents the main thematic material of the Seconda parte in a condensed version, culminating in a climactic ending. © 2023 Peter Laki
Ludwig van Beethoven: Der Kuß (1822); Die Ehre gottes aus der Natur (1803); Erlkönig (reconstruction by cees nieuwenhuizen, 2003)
franz schubert: Der atlas (1828); Prometheus (1819)
Even though they both lived in Vienna, Beethoven and Schubert moved in very different social circles and probably never met in person. Schubert only admired his older contemporary from afar. As for Beethoven, it is said that he read through some Schubert songs and was impressed. With his unique sensitivity to poetry, Schubert made the art song one of the central genres not only within his own oeuvre, but showed the way to the many great composers of Lieder who came after him. The song played a less crucial role for Beethoven, but he, too, made numerous important contributions to the song literature.
Tonight’s selections will begin with Der Kuß (“The Kiss”), a little story—not much more than a simple joke, really—by Christian Felix Weiße, who wrote everything from tragedies to children's books. The anecdote about the girl who protests, but not too much, could have fallen flat in the hands of a lesser composer. Yet Beethoven was able to turn even such a trifle into a delicious musical comedy sketch. As a complete
contrast, Die Ehre Gottes aus der Natur (“The Glory of God in Nature”) is one of a set of spiritual songs after Christian Fürchtegott Gellert, an 18th-century poet and moralist. Here Beethoven conveys the ineffable mysteries of divinity, using the simplest musical means possible. It is this awe before the heavenly powers which Beethoven expressed on a much larger scale in the last movement of the Ninth Symphony, at the moment where “the Cherub stands before God.”
The famous ballad Erlkönig by Goethe was set to music numerous times, most famously by the eighteen-year-old Schubert in 1815. It is not well known that Beethoven, too, attempted a setting, which he never finished. His draft, which probably dates from the years between 1805 and 1810, was first completed by Reinhold Becker, a German violinist and composer, at the end of the 19th century. Surprisingly, Béla Bartók orchestrated this version of Erlkönig, although his orchestration was never published. Yet Becker’s work was deemed unsatisfactory by many critics, so in 2003, Cees Nieuwenhuizen made a new version that is much closer to Beethoven’s spirit. The Dutch composer has been studying the minutest details of Beethoven’s way of writing for decades, and completed several of his unfinished works. This realization of Erlkönig allows us to see some characteristics Beethoven’s setting shares with Schubert’s, the most striking being the recitative at the end, where the child dies. Beethoven also highlighted the different speakers (narrator, father, child, the Erl King) by means of key changes, even if he did not do so as consistently as Schubert. Other times, Beethoven did not dramatize the story the way Schubert did, preferring to simply narrate it. (This interpretation is actually closer to Goethe’s original concept.)
The two Schubert selections are both intensely dramatic, portraying mythological characters enduring their tribulations with great strength and heroism. Der Atlas, one of six songs Schubert wrote on poems by the great Romantic Heinrich Heine, was published as part of the posthumous song cycle Schwanengesang (“Swan Song”). The song represents Atlas, the titan who was condemned to carry the entire world on his shoulders, and finds his suffering almost unbearable.
Prometheus, another titan who was punished by Zeus for stealing the fire from the gods and giving it to humankind, becomes, in Goethe’s retelling, a quintessential Romantic rebel who openly challenges divine authority. Schubert portrayed both heroes through a highly innovative musical language with what were radically modern harmonies at the time. Prometheus is almost like an operatic scene combined recitative and aria; this magnificent soliloquy stretches the boundaries of the Lied as commonly practiced by composers, and is exceptional even among Schubert’s own works. © 2023
Peter Lakicésar franck: sonata for violin and Piano in A major (1886)
César Franck’s father had destined his son for the career of a traveling piano virtuoso à la Franz Liszt. These dreams, however, did not come true, and Franck had to settle for a less glamorous existence. For many years, he worked as an organist at the Parisian church of Sainte Clotilde. His first major break did not come until he was fifty; in 1872, he was appointed to the Paris Conservatoire as a professor of organ. But even that did not necessarily mean success as a composer. His large-scale oratorios and other sacred works failed to make an impression. It was only during the last decade of his life that he wrote the series of masterpieces (including the A major Sonata, the Symphony, and the String Quartet) for which he is remembered to this day.
The Sonata was written in 1886, as a wedding present for the great violinist Eugène Ysaÿe, like Franck a native of Liège, Belgium. The first public performance was given by Ysaÿe in Brussels at a concert devoted to Franck’s works. The Sonata had an enormous success. The director of the Brussels Conservatoire congratulated the composer with the words: “You have transformed chamber music: thanks to you a new vision of the future has been revealed to our eyes.”
The director was not exaggerating. Franck had introduced into chamber music certain techniques never previously used in that medium. Inspired by Liszt's symphonic poems, Franck linked the four movements of the Sonata together by a network of thematic recurrences. The characters of the themes are sometimes fundamentally transformed in this process. Franck also used counterpoint more extensively than did most Romantic composers—in part because, as an organ player, he was deeply immersed in the music of J.S. Bach. Moreover, Franck had been touched by the style of Richard Wagner, who had died in 1883 but was still the most controversial modern composer in Europe. In the Violin Sonata, Franck repeatedly used a variant of the famous “Tristan” chord. He combined all these influences, however, with a boundless melodic invention all his own.
The Sonata has an unusual movement sequence. In most sonatas, the longest and weightiest movement comes at the beginning. In the Franck, this movement stands in second place, preceded by a dreamy Allegretto ben moderato. The passionate second movement is followed by a Recitativo-Fantasia that, in what was an extraordinary move in 1886, entirely dispenses with the idea of a main tonal center. The key changes constantly as the violin plays two unaccompanied cadenzas, separated by a nostalgic recollection of the first movement’s opening melody on the piano. The movement continues with an “aria” for violin that is in turn lyrical and dramatic, with a molto lento e mesto (“very slow and sad”) ending. Finally, the fourth movement crowns the Sonata with a real tour de force: its initial melody is played by the two instruments in canon—that is, the melodic lines are the same, with the violin starting one measure after the piano. The remaining themes derive from the third movement, turning the “aria” into a major dramatic outburst. A recapitulation of the canon theme and an exuberant coda ends this great sonata. ©
2023 Peter LakiCOMPOSER’S NOTES
Alan Hankers, Elapse
I started writing this string quartet for the Great Lakes Music Festival in February 2020. A few weeks into composing, the implications of COVID-19 cast a shadow over life as we all knew it. Without knowing it at the time, the music took an autobiographical turn that documented my experience during the quarantine. Like most, I spent those spring and summer months in isolation, observing the change of seasons and passing of time through the windowpanes in my apartment, where the world was adapting and transforming rapidly on the outside.
Though it wasn't my initial intention, Elapse explores the malleability of time. The musical material expands, contracts, contorts, and plateaus - representing the temporal experience of watching the world change. There's a consistent pulse that lies beneath the surface for most of the work, which captures the anxiety and hope surrounding the unfolding events.
The work was commissioned by the Great Lakes Chamber Music Festival for the Pelia String Quartet. © Alan Hankers
SuNdAy, JuNE 11 | 5 pm
OPEninG niGHt: MAstErFul MOzArt
seligman Performing Arts Center
Sponsored by Aviva & Dean Friedman
ALESSIO BAx, piano
NATHAN STARK, bass-baritone
ABEO QUARTET, Sphinx Apprentice
Ensemble
HESPER QUARTET, Shouse ensemble
FRANCESCO MILIOTO, conductor
DETROIT OPERA RESIDENT ARTISTS
ELIZABETH POLESE, soprano
MELANIE SPECTOR, soprano
GABRIELLE BARKIDJIJA, mezzo-soprano
LEO WILLIAMS, tenor
BEN REISINGER, baritone
prOgrAm
DETROIT CHAMBER WINDS & STRINGS
AMANDA BlAIkIE, lute
MERIDETH ESTEvEZ, oboe
GEOffREy JOHNSON, oboe
JACk WAlTERS, clarinet
MARCuS SCHOON, bassoon
GREG QuICk, bassoon
SCOTT STRONG, horn
NATAlIE fRITz, horn
DEREk lOCkHART, trumpet
CARRIE SCHAfER, trumpet
DOuGlAS PERkINS, timpani
kIM kENNEDy, violin
yvONNE lAM, violin
JAMES vANvAlkENBuRG, viola
DAvID lEDOux, cello
CHRIS HAMlEN, double bass
W. A. mozart Piano concerto no. 21 in c major, K. 467 (1756-91) Allegro maestoso
Andante
Allegro vivace assai
Bax, Detroit Chamber Winds & Strings, Shouse Institute Members, Milioto
intErMissiOn
W. A. mozart Così fan tutte, K. 588 Act I
Detroit Opera Resident Artists, Stark, Detroit Chamber Winds & Strings, Milioto
oPening night Dinner
Sponsored by Virginia & Michael Geheb
Join the artists after the performance for our Opening Night Dinner, kicking off the 2023 Festival. Catered by Plum Market. Call 248-559-2097 for more information.
prOgrAm NOTES
Wolfgang Amadeus
mozart: Piano concerto no. 21 in c major, K. 467 (1785)
The late H. C. Robbins Landon, a world authority on Viennese classicism, called Mozart’s decade in Vienna (1781-91) his “golden years” in the title of an insightful book on the composer. In the first five or six years of that decade, Mozart was in the center of the imperial capital’s musical life. His works, pouring forth from his pen at an astonishing speed, were widely admired. He made many friends among the influential Viennese aristocracy and high bourgeoisie, and even the Emperor, Joseph II, followed his activities with interest (though Mozart never received the court position he hoped for). In Robbins Landon’s words, “Mozart’s name was on every tongue.” The present concerto is a product of this glorious period in Mozart’s career. In Classical music, C major is usually a festive key; works in that tonality almost always include trumpets and timpani, which greatly affect their sound and their whole atmosphere. The first movement immediately establishes this mood with its march-like opening theme. As in many Mozart piano concertos, the soloist comes in “through the back door,” as it were, playing virtuoso runs before taking over the melody. Once this happens, however, the piano always remains in the foreground. The movement has what seems an over-abundance of melodies—more than the scheme of sonata form would call for. The movement doesn’t lack its moment of minor-mode melancholy (one moment seems directly to anticipate a passage in the great G minor symphony), yet the overall character of the music is joyful, serene, and majestic.
With the second-movement Andante, we enter the “holy of holies” of Mozart’s art. Against an even motion of triplets, played by muted strings, the first violins, also muted, play one of Mozart’s most transcendent melodies (once made popular by the 1967 movie Elvira Madigan), filled with wide leaps and great dynamic contrasts. The delicate minor second clashes and the tender modulations probably played a role in Leopold Mozart’s strong reaction to the work. As Mozart’s father wrote to his daughter Nannerl, he had been moved to tears by the beauties of the work (and also the enthusiastic reception it received).
The third movement achieves the great feat of not being a comedown after this exceptional Andante. There are many spirited dialogues between the piano and the wind section and quite a few delightful musical surprises to enjoy. © 2023 Peter Laki
Act i from Così fan tutte, ossia la scuola degli amanti (“All Women Are Like that, or the school of Lover s,” K. 588, 1790) music by W. A. mozart
Libretto by Lorenzo da Ponte
In the two hundred and thirty-three years since its premiere, many people have thought there was something wrong with Così fan tutte. Critics and analysts have complained about its allegedly immoral, frivolous and misogynistic libretto, which they saw as being at odds with Mozart’s sublime music. In fact, the premise of the opera seems cruel and cynical enough. Who could possibly approve of a plot that revolves around two young men disguising themselves to seduce each other’s girlfriends, in order to prove a “philosophical” point about “all women” being by nature unfaithful? Yet if one looks beneath the surface, the plot reveals some unexpected psychological insights about both men and women that are reinforced and made even more profound by the music.
What is so extraordinary about Così is that, unlike other operas where the commitment of the central pair of lovers can never be questioned, here you are allowed to wonder which pairing is right: the original constellation Fiordiligi-Guglielmo and Dorabella-Fernando, or the second one, where the partners are switched. Da Ponte and Mozart had the audacity to suggest that maybe the “switched” pairing is the right one after all, and the voice types (among other clues) give it all away. According to operatic convention, the soprano (Fiordiligi) always goes with the tenor (Fernando), and the mezzo (Dorabella) with the baritone (Guglielmo). When we see the two couples in Act I, everything is fairly conventional between them; the real sparks don’t start flying until Act II, when the men are in disguise.
At the beginning of Act I, the two officers affirm that their girlfriends could never be unfaithful to them. Their friend, the philosopher Don Alfonso, challenges them to a bet. In the meantime, the two girls gush over the portraits of their lovers.
Don Alfonso brings the fake news of the immediate departure of the men to the battlefield. The women nearly swoon from their distress as the men depart. Don Alfonso expounds his anti-woman philosophy. Soon afterwards, we hear the anti-man counterpart from the young ladies’ maid, Despina, who soon takes charge, telling Fiordiligi and Dorabella that men are by nature inconstant and that they might as well take advantage of their grass-widowhood.
Don Alfonso bribes Despina to help him introduce two “strangers” to her mistresses. Ferrando and Guglielmo enter, disguised as exotic Albanians. They immediately begin to make advances—each to his friend's girlfriend, but are vehemently rebuffed by Fiordiligi, and the ladies flee in disgust. The men are overjoyed; they believe they have already won their bet, but Don Alfonso urges them to wait until tomorrow. Unlike the somewhat coarse and flippant Guglielmo, Ferrando displays significant depths of emotion in his aria, in which he anticipates the joys of an “amorous hour”— at this point, presumably, still with his official fiancée Dorabella (although who knows for sure?).
The “Albanians” now resort to blackmail, pretending to have taken poison in their despair at having been rejected. The compassionate women begin to take pity on the strangers. Their call for a doctor is answered by Despina who appears disguised as a physician, complete with a false mustache. In a delicious parody of the then-famous magnetic therapy of Dr. Mesmer (who “mesmerized” his patients), Despina pulls the poison out of the “patients” with a big piece of iron. Emboldened, the men ask the women for a kiss —but once again they have gone too far. Fiordiligi and Dorabella exit in indignation while the men, once again, feel triumphant, although Despina and Don Alfonso begin to see signs of a change of heart. © 2023
Peter LakiThe Levy Group of Companies celebrates the Chamber’s mission of bringing together the world’s most celebrated artists to deliver extraordinary musical performances and experiences for all.
Thank you for your commitment to an inclusive and welcoming culture where differences are valued so that the community may experience these outstanding artists performing chamber music at its best!
TuESdAy, JuNE 13 | 7 pm
EvEry MOvE, EvEry DECisiOn
st. Hugo of the Hills - Gathering space
Sponsored by Marguerite Munson Lentz & David Lentz
ALESSIO BAx, piano
GILLES VONSATTEL, piano
ROBYN BOLLINGER, violin
YVONNE LAM, violin
TESSA LARK, violin
HSIN-YUN HUANG, viola
ERIC NOWLIN, viola
PAUL WATKINS, cello
PETER WILEY, cello
HESPER QUARTET, Shouse ensemble
prOgrAm
Joseph haydn string Quartet in g major, op. 77, no. 1, “Lobkowitz” (1732-1809)
Allegro moderato
Adagio
Minuet: Presto – Trio
Finale: Presto
Hesper Quartet
camille saint-saëns cello sonata no. 1 in c minor, op. 32 (1835-1921)
Allegro
Andante tranquillo sostenuto
Allegro moderato
Vonsattel, Watkins
intErMissiOn
carlos simon be still and know (b. 1986) Bax, Lam, Watkins
Ludwig van Beethoven string Quintet in c major, op. 29 (1770-1827)
Allegro moderato
Adagio molto espressivo
Scherzo: Allegro
Presto
Lark, Bollinger, Huang, Nowlin, Wiley
prOgrAm NOTES
Joseph haydn: string Quartet in g major, op. 77, no. 1 “Lobkowitz” (1799)
In 1799, two years after completing his celebrated series of six string quartets for Count Erdödy (Op. 76), Haydn started work on yet another set, this time for Prince Lobkowitz. He only completed two of the six, however. Were the 67-year-old master’s creative powers waning? Or was there another reason for his withdrawal?
Around the same time Haydn was working on string quartets for Lobkowitz, a younger composer by the name of Ludwig van Beethoven was doing the very same thing. Beethoven completed his set of six quartets (later published as Op. 18) in the spring of 1800. It may well be that Haydn stopped work on his project at least in part because of the arrival on the scene of the unruly young genius. Haydn used to call Beethoven, his rebellious former student, the “Grand Mogul,” in a mocking reference to the younger man’s boundless ambition, though he was the first to recognize Beethoven’s exceptional talent. Haydn understandably wanted to avoid direct competition with Beethoven, who was already a darling of the aristocratic salons in Vienna and one of the most sought-after musicians in the city.
The least one can say of the two quartets of Op. 77 is that Haydn rose to his younger colleague’s challenge in every way. Some moments in the two works have even been said to be echoes or reflections of what we now call “early” Beethoven. The first of the two quartets opens with an Allegro moderato that fills out its regular sonata-form scheme with many subtle surprises and delicate touches. The second movement is in E-flat major, a tonality rather far removed from the original key of G. It is one of Haydn’s greatest Adagios, with themes of a rich singing quality and a harmonic range that is sometimes reminiscent of Beethoven. The first violin part adds some elaborate ornaments to the highly expressive melodies.
The third movement (Minuet and Trio) is even more “Beethovenian.” Many of the movement’s features are most unusual for Haydn and announce a new era. The tempo is extremely fast for a minuet. Off-beat accents abound in the theme. Almost all repeats are written out (instead of being indicated by repeat signs), and important changes are introduced the second time around. Most astonishingly, no clear separation exists between minuet and trio; the trio arrives without warning by way of an unexpected jump into the key of E-flat major, visiting that remote tonality for the second time in the quartet. The ending of this highly dramatic trio is left open, as the music gradually modulates back to G.
The following Presto is Haydn’s last word on the “contradanse” finale, one of his favorite movement types for decades. The main theme is presented twice at the beginning: the first time in unison and then with harmonies. This duality of simplicity and sophistication remains the principal driving force throughout the movement, right up to the ending, for which Haydn saved some delicious last-minute surprises. ©
2023 Peter Lakicamille saint-saëns: cello sonata no. 1 in c minor, op. 32 (1872)
No composer has ever been able to match the unbelievable precocity of Mozart, who wrote his first symphony at the age of eight. Saint-Saëns, however, came close. He first played the piano in public at the age of five, and at ten gave his formal debut at Paris’s Salle Pleyel, performing Mozart and Beethoven concertos and offering to play any of Beethoven’s sonatas from memory as an encore.
Saint-Saënseventually grew up to become a national institution in France, one of the country’s most prominent composers, pianists and organists, who was universally respected, though far from uncontroversial.
Though not a string player himself, Saint-Saëns had a strong affinity for string instruments. He wrote three concertos and numerous other solo works for violin, as well as two concertos and two sonatas for cello (not to mention “The Swan,” that most beloved of cello solos from The Carnival of the Animals). A third cello sonata survives in fragmentary form, and has recently been completed and published.
The first cello sonata was written in close proximity to the first cello concerto, and premiered at the Société Nationale de Musique, a society for the promotion of chamber music which Saint-Saëns had co-founded in 1871. Auguste Tolbecque played the cello part, with the composer at the piano.
The key of C minor traditionally inspired works that were intensely dramatic in tone, and the present sonata is no exception. The first and last movements continue the best Sturm und Drang (“storm and stress”) tradition in Classical and Romantic music, with the central Andante, which has echoes of Bach and Schumann, as a muchneeded respite. The piano part is so difficult that some commentators have spoken about a “piano sonata with cello accompaniment,” but that description is not quite accurate. The cello has many of the great melodies, and they are often placed in the low register of the instrument, which requires the pianist to be careful not to drown out the cello. While the upper strings of the cello can sing like an operatic tenor, the low C and G strings, if not covered up, have a very special, powerful ring to them, which Saint-Saëns exploited to the fullest.
There is an amusing anecdote about this sonata, reported by Charles-Marie Widor, the great French organist and composer (1844-1937) who had at one point been Saint-Saëns’s assistant at the church of the Madeleine. According to Widor, SaintSaëns’s mother did not like the last movement, and, in just a few days, the composer wrote a new finale, which is the one we know today. Swedish cellist Mats Lidström, who recorded the sonata, noted that the last movement contains quotes from Giacomo Meyerbeer’s opera L’Africaine (1864)—“possibly a favorite of Saint-Saëns’s mother’s.” © 2023 Peter
LakiLudwig van Beethoven: String Quintet in C major, Op. 29 (1801)
Beethoven arranged two of his early wind compositions for string quintet, and wrote two more (partially completed) quintets in his late period. The present work, however, is his only full-fledged original composition for the “enhanced” string quartet. But the scoring is not the only unique feature of Op. 29. It is in many ways an exceptional work, with many features that appear either for the first time, or even the only time, in Beethoven’s music.
The quintet used to be known under the nickname “The Storm,” on account of the opening of its last movement, with the thunder-like tremolos in the four lower instruments against the “lightning” theme in the first violin. Yet we don’t have to wait until the finale to be surprised. Already the first movement features some distant modulations and other novel forms of thematic development that announce what we recognize, with hindsight, as Beethoven’s middle period—a period that the composer, at the age of thirty, was just about to enter.
As in the Mozart string quintets, the addition of a second viola strengthens the lower end of the sound spectrum. The second viola can either reinforce the middle voices (second violin, first viola), or else double the cello at the octave, thereby achieving a quasi-orchestral effect, similarly to the way the contrabasses double the cellos in an orchestra.
The C major quintet has one of Beethoven’s most effusive slow movements. It is an expansive lyrical song introduced by the first violin, but it is the ever-changing inner voices that give the movement its special character: pizzicatos (plucked notes), quick note repeats, pulsating syncopations and more make sure that something new is happening at every turn.
The third movement is a scherzo—a playful, fast piece of the kind that Beethoven, building on Haydn’s example, had thoroughly made his own already in his early Viennese works from the 1790s. Here, like elsewhere, he makes the most of a simple theme of only a few notes; the high energy of the movement doesn’t diminish, even in the central trio section.
Yet it is the “stormy” last movement that has the greatest number of stylistic novelties. Following that most unusual opening already mentioned, Beethoven wrote a rhythmically intricate development section where a whole fugato (section based on imitation) is superimposed on top of the storm music. And if that were not enough, the recapitulation is interrupted by a graceful minuet that seems to come out of nowhere. After a return of the “storm,” the minuet even reappears for a second time. As a final surprise, the last appearance of the storm theme suddenly veers off into a distant key, from which Beethoven then has to make his way back to his home tonality of C major. © 2023 Peter
LakiComposer’s Notes
Carlos Simon, be still and know (2016)
This piece was inspired by an interview with Oprah Winfrey, in which she said:
“I have felt the presence of God my whole life. Even when I didn’t have a name for it, I could feel the voice bigger than myself speaking to me, and all of us have that same voice. Be still and know it. You can acknowledge it or not. You can worship it or not. You can praise it, you can ignore it or you can know it. Know it. It’s always there speaking to you and waiting for you to hear it in every move, in every decision.” - Oprah Winfrey, May 25, 2011
© Carlos Simon
WEdNESdAy, JuNE 14 | 7 pm
tHE FEstivAl in rEsiDEnCE: WinDsOr
the Capitol theatre, Windsor
Sponsored by the Morris & Beverly Baker Foundation
HSIN-YUN HUANG, viola
PETER WILEY, cello
HESPER QUARTET, Shouse ensemble
p rO grA m
the first two “Razumovsky” quartets, the C major does not contain an original Russian melody, identified as such in the score. Yet the musicologist Mark Ferraguto traced the theme of this Andante to a Russian song published in the Allgemeine musikalische Zeitung. But Beethoven did not quote the tune in its original form and only used a characteristic melodic turn from it, making the melody even more exotic by adding an augmented second that was not present in the original. This mysterious first theme is followed by a second idea, which evokes a graceful dance. A haunting new melody is heard at the end of the movement, in a coda that seems to vanish in a Romantic mist.
Ludwig van Beethoven string Quartet no. 9, op. 59, no. 3 (1770-1827)
intErMissiOn
Andante con moto – Allegro vivace
Andante con moto quasi allegretto
Menuetto
Allegro molto
Hesper Quartet
Johannes Brahms string sextet no. 1 in B-flat major, op. 18 (1833-97)
Allegro ma non troppo
Andante, ma moderato
Scherzo: Allegro molto
Rondo: Poco allegretto e grazioso
Huang, Wiley, Hesper Quartet
prOgrAm NOTES
Ludwig van Beethoven: string Quartet in c major, op. 59, no. 3 (1806)
The present quartet is the last in a set of three that Beethoven composed for Count Andrey Razumovsky, the Russian ambassador in Vienna at the height of his so-called “heroic,” or middle period. It is a lively and dynamic work that is definitely heroic in the boldness of its themes. The first movement begins with a slow introduction consisting of a mysterious sequence of chords that do not define any particular tonality and do not arrive at the home key of C major until the very end. (It was evidently influenced by the famous opening of Mozart’s “Dissonant” quartet [K. 465], also in C major.) Even the Allegro vivace gets off to a somewhat tentative start, with an unaccompanied flourish for the first violin, punctuated by brief chords in the other instruments. Despite the obvious allusions to Mozart, there is a fierce intensity here that we never find in earlier music. The principal generating idea of the movement is to make amorphous material gradually more organized. By the development section, the loose textures of the exposition are solidified into a strict canon based on a twonote pattern. The violin flourish that serves as the movement’s first theme is lavishly ornamented when it returns to announce the recapitulation.
The second movement Andante has “an aura of remote, almost mythical melancholy and remoteness,” in the words of musicologist William Kinderman. Unlike
The graceful third-movement minuet is a nostalgic evocation of the past. The choice of a minuet is significant, for by 1806 Beethoven was much more likely to write fast-paced, surprise-filled scherzos in both chamber and symphonic music. In the trio section Beethoven strikes a more modern note, with some characteristic offbeat accents (a device he was particularly fond of) and an unusually high first violin part. The recapitulation of the minuet is followed by an extensive coda, introducing a sad, minor-key variation of the minuet theme that leads directly into the last movement—a perpetual motion that begins as a fugue, its lengthy subject introduced by the viola. By the time all four instruments have entered, fugal counterpoint gives way to chordal writing; the two kinds of texture alternate throughout the movement. The extremely fast tempo generates a high level of excitement that culminates in the surprise rest just before the end, after which the mad rush continues with even more fire than before. © 2023
Peter LakiJohannes Brahms: string sextet no. 1 in B-flat major (1858-60)
The two sextets for two violins, two violas, and two cellos are Brahms’s earliest chamber works without piano, preceding the string quartets and quintets by many years. They reveal a composer full of youthful energy yet possessed of an emotional maturity well beyond his years.
Brahms in his mid-twenties did not feel quite ready to write a string quartet. In that genre, Beethoven’s legacy seemed particularly oppressive. Although the performing forces are larger, a string sextet actually presented a lesser challenge. First of all, sextets did not have such a daunting history (in fact, they hardly had any history at all), and second, chamber ensembles of six or more players (not necessarily all strings) had previously been associated with lighter, serenade-type music. Brahms, who had composed two orchestral serenades in the late 1850s, adapted their genial atmosphere to the chamber music medium in his first sextet, premiered in Hannover by Joseph Joachim and five of his colleagues on October 20, 1860.
Joachim was not only one of the greatest violinists of his time, he was also a composer in his own right. During their long friendship, Brahms often asked Joachim for his opinion in compositional matters. In the case of the first sextet, Joachim felt that the opening theme of the first movement needed to be stated twice, lest the subsequent modulations begin too soon. Brahms heeded the advice, and added ten measures at the beginning of the work. The first cello thus received the honor of announcing the lyrical theme, before it is taken over by the first violin. The character of this tender and romantic movement is best defined by the performance instructions espressivo, tranquillo, and dolce, found frequently in the score. (A recent study shows that in making these suggestions, Joachim was inspired by Beethoven’s String Quintet Op. 29, performed at our last concert.)
The second movement, a theme and variations, contains some unmistakable echoes of Bach’s famous Chaconne from the D minor partita for unaccompanied violin (a piece that Brahms later arranged for piano left hand). The D minor melody, like many Baroque variation themes, is dominated by a descending harmonic progression, but Brahms enriched it with some characteristic modal (that is, neither major nor minor) inflections. There are five variations, of which the first three grow gradually more and more impassioned. In variations IV and V, the key changes to D major, and the music evolves from gentle lyricism to a moment of supreme magic. The theme then reappears in its original form but in a much more subdued instrumentation.
The third movement is a brief scherzo in the Beethovenian mold, with allusions to the Fifth and Seventh Symphonies. The main section, already quite fast, frames a Trio that is even more animated. Some of the trio’s thematic material returns, à la Beethoven, as the movement’s coda.
The last movement’s graceful theme is passed from the first cello to the first violin, as in the opening movement. The light serenade tone prevails throughout, except for a brief moment where the music becomes more agitated. Each time the main theme returns, its instrumentation changes. The work ends with a spirited coda, getting faster and faster to the end.
© 2023 Peter LakiWednesday, June 14 | 7:30 Pm
TasTing noTes: Diver TimenTo wiTh a siDe of PimenTo mongers’ Provisions – Berkley
Sponsored by Joy & Allan Nachman and Linda Goodman in memory of Dolores Curiel
KImBErLy KaLoyanIDES KEnnEDy, violin
PhILIP SETzEr, violin
PauL WaTKInS, cello
LInDa SETzEr, narrator
Program
W. A. Mozart Divertimento No. 2 in C major, K.Anh.229/439b (1756-91) Setzer, Kennedy, Watkins
Béla Bartók Selections from 44 Duos for 2 Violins, Sz. 98 (1881-1945)
16. Burlesque
19. a Fairy Tale
38. romanian Whirling Dance
37. Prelude and Canon
42. arabian Dance
43. Pizzicato
28. Sorrow
44. Transylvanian Dance
Setzer, Kennedy
Alan Ridout Ferdinand the Bull, for speaker and violin (1934-96) Philip Setzer, Linda Setzer
ThurSdAy, JuNE 15 | 7 pm
yOutHFul invEntiOns
temple Beth El
Sponsored by Plante Moran
ALESSIO BAx, piano
YVONNE LAM, violin
TESSA LARK, violin
HSIN-YUN HUANG, viola
PETER WILEY, cello
ABEO QUARTET, Sphinx Apprentice Ensemble
PELIA STRING QUARTET, Shouse ensemble
prOgrAm
Johannes Brahms Piano Quintet in f minor, op. 34
(1833-97) Allegro non troppo
Andante, un poco adagio
Scherzo: Allegro
Finale: Poco sostenuto – Allegro non troppo
Bax, Abeo Quartet
Kian ravaei the Little things (WorLD Premiere)
(b. 1999)
I. I’ll Tell You How the Sun Rose
II. High from the Earth I Heard a Bird
III. Two Butterflies Went Out at Noon
IV. A Narrow Fellow in the Grass
V. The Moon Was But a Chin of Gold
VI. A Spider Sewed at Night
VII. If I Can Stop One Heart From Breaking
Abeo Quartet
felix mendelssohn octet in e-flat major, op. 20, mWv r20
(1809-47) Allegro moderato ma con fuoco
Andante
Scherzo: Allegro leggerissimo
Presto
Lark, Lam, Huang, Wiley, Pelia String Quartet
prOgrAm NOTES
Johannes Brahms: Piano Quintet in f minor, op. 34 (1864)
Several of Brahms’s major works started life as sonatas for two pianos, and assumed their final forms later. This is true of the First Piano Concerto (whose original two-piano version is lost) and the Haydn Variations. The case of the Piano Quintet is more complicated because the two-piano version was preceded by yet another incarnation, for string quintet. This early form, which was the only time Brahms followed Schubert’s string quintet scoring (with two cellos) as opposed to Mozart’s (with two violas), is lost, but the Sonata for Two Pianos, Op. 34b, is a staple in the repertoire of all two-piano teams. Brahms’s lifelong friend, the great pianist Clara Schumann, wrote to the composer: “It is masterly from every point of view, but -- it is not a sonata, but a work whose ideas you might — and must — scatter over an entire orchestra… Please, for this once take my advice and recast it.” Brahms did recast the work, but not for orchestra. Reluctant to let go of the piano sound, he decided in favor of the piano quintet. It was in this form that Op. 34 was published in 1865 and became a classic of the chamber music literature. (The two-piano version was published six years later.)
The Piano Quintet bursts with energy, power, and that serious yet never austere bearing so characteristic of Brahms. The four movements are extremely contrasted yet they are connected through subtle motivic links. The first movement’s dark unison opening theme generates much of the musical material of the entire work. This Allegro non troppo is unrelentingly dramatic, only occasionally tempered by the gentle lyricism of a second theme. Unusual tonal relationships—with the movement’s secondary key a half-step higher than expected—increase the intensity of the musical processes.
The Andante, un poco adagio that follows is a calm, songlike movement in a regular A - BA form that, with its sweet parallel thirds and sixths, is like a Romantic dream. Yet even here, the harmonic movement “overshoots the mark” by a half-step (going from A-flat major to E major, not the expected E-flat), giving the music an extra edge of tension.
The third movement, now mysterious, now heroic in mood, was described as “perhaps the most ‘demonic’ of Brahms scherzi” by Malcolm MacDonald, author of an excellent survey of Brahms’s life and work. The scherzo is characterized by an irresistible rhythmic drive that persists even in the Trio, where the gloomy C minor tonality temporarily changes to major.
The finale opens with a remarkable Poco sostenuto introduction, described by MacDonald as “numb, ghostly string figures groping their way in glacial imitation into perhaps the most emotionally afflicted music the work has yet encompassed.” The fast tempo arrives with a serene and relaxed main theme that, however, alternates with stormier episodes. Near the end, the music again assumes the impassioned tone of the first movement. © Peter Laki
felix mendelssohn: octet for strings in e-flat major, op. 20 (1825)
Mendelssohn wrote his Octet in 1825, the same year Beethoven composed his String Quartet in B-flat major (Op. 130) which originally ended with the Great Fugue. At 55, Beethoven was nearing the end of his career; the 16-year-old Mendelssohn was just starting his. Much ink has been spilled over who was “modern” and who was “conservative,” who was “Classical” and who was “Romantic.” Mendelssohn never tried to explode Classical forms the way Beethoven did in his late quartets, filled with unconventional movement sequences and dramatic interruptions. Yet the younger composer infused those traditional forms with a new energy in ways that were absolutely unheard of. He invented a whole new genre with his Octet, which calls for what can be considered either a large chamber group or a small
orchestra. Mendelssohn noted in his manuscript: “This Octet must be played by all instruments in symphonic orchestral style. Pianos and fortes must be strictly observed and more strongly emphasized than is usual in pieces of this character.”
Yet there were really no other “pieces of this character” to speak of. True, Louis Spohr had written some works for eight string players, but those were double quartets, conceived as dialogs between two separate groups. Mendelssohn, on the other hand, treated his eight players as a single, integrated unit, which was a totally unprecedented compositional approach.
As for the young prodigy’s melodic style, one need only compare the Octet’s opening with the “sunrise” theme at the beginning of Haydn’s String Quartet in B-flat, Op. 76, No. 4 (1796-97). Mendelssohn was apparently inspired by that opening, but Haydn’s theme is to Mendelssohn’s what a sunrise would be to a solar flare. The Octet begins with a true stroke of genius, and the continuation is in every way worthy of that exceptional opening.
In all four movements, Classical gestures are similarly magnified and expanded upon. The second movement, in C minor, begins and ends in a gentle pianissimo, evoking a nocturnal mood, but there are some extremely powerful emotional outbursts in between. The third movement is the first in a long line of Mendelssohnian scherzos in a very fast tempo and of a light and impish character. It is cast in a modified sonata form, and is therefore not really a scherzo, structurally speaking. Felix didn’t take the time to relax in a contrasting trio section as one might have expected in a scherzo. In the concluding Presto, finally, the young composer pulled out all the stops. He wrote a brilliant fugue, as a bow to the music of the Baroque which he had already begun to study and which would play such an important role in his later life. The quote from Handel’s Messiah (“And He shall reign for ever and ever”) cannot be missed. But there is also plenty of playfulness in the movement, along with some harmonic surprises that would have made Handel—and probably Beethoven, too—raise his eyebrows in disbelief, mixed with admiration. © 2023 Peter
LakiCOmpOSEr’S NOTES
Kian
ravaei, the Little things
All seven titles which comprise The Little Things come from Emily Dickinson, who never fails to direct our attention toward nature’s easily overlooked wonders. Movements II, III, IV, and VI evoke various animal life, while I and V portray the sun and moon respectively. The order of the movements suggests the cyclic journey of all living things from morning to night to a new morning. © Kian
RavaeiIn the final movement, we hear the voice of Nature singing Dickinson’s famous lines:
If I can stop one heart from breaking, I shall not live in vain;
If I can ease one life the aching, Or cool one pain, Or help one fainting robin Unto his nest again, I shall not live in vain.
The Little Things was co-commissioned by Chamber Music Northwest, the Great Lakes Chamber Music Festival and the Seattle Chamber Music Society as part of a new annual collaboration, supported by the Maxine and Stuart Frankel Foundation.
FridAy, JuNE 16 | 11 Am
MOrninG GlOriEs
temple Beth El Chapel
Sponsored by Beverly Baker & Dr. Edward Treisman
HSIN-YUN HUANG, viola
KENNETH THOMPKINS, trombone
JOSEPH BECKER, percussion
AYA PIANO TRIO, Shouse ensemble
prOgrAm
Jeff scott silenced angels speak (b.1967) African Violet
Our Midnight Place
Thompkins, Becker
Ludwig van Beethoven Piano Quartet in e-flat major, op. 16 (1770-1827) Grave – Allegro ma non troppo
Andante cantabile
Rondo: Allegro, ma non troppo
Huang, AYA Piano Trio
intErMissiOn
Johannes Brahms Piano trio no. 1, op. 8 (1833-97) Allegro con brio
Scherzo: Allegro molto
Adagio
Allegro
AYA Piano Trio
This concert will be followed by a reception with Festival Visual Artist Senghor Reid at 1 p.m. Reid draws inspiration for his paintings from current events and from his hometown of Detroit.
prOgrAm NOTES
Ludwig van Beethoven: Quartet in e-flat major, op. 16 (1796)
Beethoven’s only piano quartet is a reworking of his quintet for piano and winds. It was one in a series of compositions that made the composer’s name known in Vienna soon after the young musician had moved there from his native Bonn in 1792. Mozart’s influence is apparent at every turn, yet there are many signs revealing the birth of one of the most individual styles in musical history.
In its original form as a quintet, Beethoven’s piece was modeled on Mozart’s quintet for piano and winds. Not only do the two works share the same key of E-flat major, their second movements are also in the same tonality (B-flat), and they have a number of
continued on page 16
continued from page 15
additional points in common, most notably the slow introductions which were much more frequent in symphonies than in chamber works. Yet, as British musicologist Nicholas Marston has observed, Beethoven has a tendency “to be symphonic in a non-symphonic medium,” and to indulge in a certain “over-extravagance” shown by the fact that the first movement is unusually long and contains many more themes than the standard sonata scheme would call for.
The Grave introduction is built around a solemn motif in dotted rhythm. It strikes a serious tone after which the light and graceful melodies of the Allegro ma non troppo come both as a relief and a contrast. Only in the development section does the music become more tempestuous, and then only for a while. The most “Beethovenian” feature (that is, the one most strongly anticipating his mature style) is the extended coda, introduced by a piano cadenza.
The second movement (Andante cantabile) has a song-like theme that receives more and more extensive ornamentation each time it returns. The recurrences of the theme are separated by two more agitated episodes.
The third movement opens with a melody that resembles several of Mozart’s finale themes. It is cheerful and lighthearted music with only occasional and transient clouds on the horizon. In the coda, Beethoven breaks up the main theme into small fragments (this procedure would remain one of his favorite methods of motivic development) and plays many delightful games with it. As in many of his later works, the end is announced by a long piano trill. © 2023 Peter Laki
Johannes Brahms: Piano trio no. 1 in B major, op. 8 (1854, rev. 1889)
Written in 1854, the Piano Trio in B major was radically revised by Brahms 35 years later. Interestingly, the composer did not withdraw the first version but rather allowed it to co-exist with the recomposition. However, the work is almost always heard in its 1889 form, which managed to combine the exuberance of the 21-year-old genius (who, in Schumann’s words, had, “like Minerva, sprung fully armed from the head of Jove”) with the consummate artistry of the mature master of fifty-six.
Many of the gorgeous melodies that fill this masterwork had been there from the start. The recomposition had to do mostly with the development of the themes, and with making the transitions smooth and coherent, more classical in spirit than they were in the early version, which occasionally indulged in some Romantic excesses. “It will not be as wild as it was before,” Brahms wrote to Clara Schumann while at work on the revision, “but whether it will be better—?”
In fact, one of the most stunning things about this trio is how its opening melody—a quiet theme with a solemn, dignified gait—is gradually and seamlessly transformed into a fiery and impassioned statement. These two temperaments—and the major and minor modes—alternate throughout the movement. The final coda section switches to a slower Tranquillo tempo, instead of a faster one as might be expected, only resuming the original speed again for the energetic closing chords.
The second movement Scherzo, in B minor, was left almost entirely intact from the 1854 original. The utter simplicity of its opening theme has reminded some commentators of Mendelssohn’s scherzo from A Midsummer Night’s Dream, though the continuation, and especially the major mode middle section (Trio) with its glorious melody in parallel sixths, is pure Brahms. Particularly ingenious is the way the melody
of the middle section grows out of a characteristic motif in the scherzo proper, providing a subtle connection between the two parts of the movement.
In the third movement Adagio (again in B major) the soft chord progressions of the piano are in dialog with the expressive melody of the two string instruments. Eventually, a more continuous texture develops as the cello begins a new melody with a more sustained piano accompaniment. The opening material (alternating piano chords and string duet) returns, with the difference that this time the piano adds a sensitive countermelody. At the end of the movement, all three instruments take over the slow chordal theme that grows ever softer and softer.
The last movement, though in an Allegro tempo, begins with a lyrical cello theme in B minor; it only gathers more momentum with the muscular second theme in D major. (This theme was new in the 1889 version, replacing another that was too strongly reminiscent of Beethoven and Schumann, and had too many personal associations with Clara.) Both themes are subsequently repeated before we reach the final section, in which the first theme takes on a much more tempestuous character than before. Contrary to all expectations, this major mode piano trio ends dramatically in B minor (it is much more frequent to see a minor mode work end in major than vice versa). Although totally rewritten, the minor mode ending is a remnant of the original version of 1854, true to the restless spirit of the artist as a young man. © 2023 Peter
LakiCOmpOSEr’S NOTES
Jeff scott: silenced angels speak
Silenced Angels Speak offered a fun exploration in the musical expression of a complex emotion. Even more joyous was the non- traditional combination of instruments offered as the conduits. I imagined the percussionist and trombonist as angels. Angels, rendered voiceless and tasked to return to earth to demonstrate the importance and power of love, expressed without words. Each of the four movements are based on and titled after poems of love. African Violet by Miguel Edwards, Our Midnight Place by Vee Bdosa, Love by DeVonta Reese and Bookmark by Kewayne Wadley. ©Jeff Scott
FridAy, JuNE 16 | 7 pm
sHOusE: sCHuMAnn & sHOstAKOviCH
Detroit institute of Arts rivera Court
HESPER QUARTET, Shouse ensemble
PELIA STRING QUARTET, Shouse ensemble
prOgrAm
robert schumann string Quartet no. 3 in A major, op. 41, no. 3 (1810-56) Andante espressivo – Allegro molto moderato
Assai agitato
Adagio molto
Finale: Allegro molto vivace – Quasi Trio
Hesper Quartet
Dmitri shostakovich two Pieces for string octet, op. 11 (1906-75) Prelude: Adagio – Più mosso – Adagio
Scherzo: Allegro molto – Moderato – Allegro
Hesper Quartet, Pelia String Quartet
int E r M issi O n
Dmitri shostakovich string Quartet no. 15 in e-flat minor, op. 144
Elegy: Adagio
Serenade: Adagio
Intermezzo: Adagio
Nocturne: Adagio
Funeral march: Adagio molto
Epilogue: Adagio
Pelia String Quartet
Friday, June 16 | 7:30 pm
The FesTival in Residence: ann aRboR
Kerrytown concert house
Gilles Vonsattel, piano
YVonne lam, violin
tessa lark, violin
Paul Watkins, cello
program
Maurice Ravel Sonata for Violin and Cello, M. 73 (1875-1937) allegro
très vif
lent
Vif, avec entrain
Lark, Watkins
Ludwig van Beethoven Piano Sonata No. 26 in E-flat major, Op. 81a, “Les Adieux” (1770-1827) Das Lebewohl (the Farewell): adagio – allegro
Abwesenheit (absence): andante espressivo
Das Wiedersehen (the return): Vivacissimamente Vonsattel
in T e RM ission
Dmitri Shostakovich Piano Trio No. 2 in E minor, Op. 67 (1906-75) andante – moderato
allegro con brio
largo
allegretto – adagio
Vonsattel, Lam, Watkins
program noTeS
Maurice Ravel: Sonata for Violin and Cello (1922)
ravel’s sonata for Violin and Cello was dedicated to the memory of Claude Debussy, who had died in 1918. one of only a few works for violin-cello duo in the repertoire, it was preceded by Zoltán kodály’s Duo, op. 7 (1914), which, according to ravel biographer arbie orenstein, was known to the French master. orenstein even detected traces of Hungarian style in the last movement of the sonata. if that is true, then we have an interesting case of mutual influence, for the young kodály’s visit to Paris in 1907 and his encounter with the music of Debussy and ravel had a decisive impact on his whole career.
What ravel’s sonata shares with kodály’s duo is a taste for pentatonic melodies built of symmetrical phrases and a predilection for the interval of the perfect fourth. But ravel mixed pentatonic elements with daring dissonances and rhythmic complexities all his continued on page 18
own. The unity of the work is strengthened by numerous melodic links between the movements.
The first movement has a warm and lyrical opening melody, contrasted by a second theme with a series of dissonant major seventh leaps and a syncopated third idea. The second movement is a scherzo in an extremely fast tempo that plays ambivalent games with the major and minor modes on one hand and duple and triple meters on the other. There are extended bitonal passages (different keys heard simultaneously); both instruments play pizzicato (plucking the strings) for long stretches of time. At the end, the cello’s final note, C, comes as a great surprise, since the entire movement suggested A as the main tonal center.
In the slow third movement, the main melody gradually becomes louder and faster, only to return to its initial state at the end. At the climactic moment, the majorseventh theme from the first movement returns (we will hear it again in the finale).
The last movement is extremely lively. It strings together several folk-dance-like tunes, some of which are in changing meter and make use of bold harmonies and several special playing techniques. Like the second movement, the fourth ends with a surprise pizzicato C, this time written as a chord for both instruments.
The Sonata marks an important departure from Ravel’s pre-war compositions. Gradually turning away from his earlier “impressionism,” he began to write in a crisper and wittier way, ushering in a new style that would culminate in his last major works, the two piano concertos completed between 1929 and 1931. © 2023 Peter Laki
Ludwig van Beethoven: Piano Sonata No. 26 in E-flat major, Op. 81/a “Les Adieux” (1809-10)
The farewell, absence and return that this famous sonata commemorates were by no means ordinary events. The person who made these moves was the 21-year-old Archduke Rudolph, the youngest brother of the Austrian Emperor Francis I, who was forced to flee Vienna in the wake of Napoleon’s invasion. Rudolph was a talented musician who studied piano and composition with Beethoven. Teacher and pupil formed a strong bond, and the composer obviously missed his exiled young friend.
The present sonata was the only one Beethoven ever wrote with an explicit program in mind. The motives of farewell, absence and return lent themselves naturally for the three-movement outline of the sonata (fast-slow-fast), and the extra-musical context threw that outline in even sharper relief.
Beethoven wrote the word Lebewohl (Farewell) over the first three notes of the sonata. These three notes, together with their added second voice, unmistakably evoke a pair of horns, which in turn alludes to the signal given by the stagecoaches in which one (though not necessarily the royals) traveled in those days. The motif is developed in a brief Adagio introduction that soon gives way to an agitated Allegro that expresses the whole range of feelings inspired by this particular parting.
The second movement, in Beethoven’s tragic key of C minor, depicts the pain of the separation. But the pain does not last long: the relatively brief movement continues without interruption, with an explosion of joy at the long-awaited return of the missed friend. The tempo marking is Vivacissimamente, most lively, and, except for a brief slow-down just before the end, the music retains its extraordinary momentum all the way through.
© 2023 Peter LakiDmitri Shostakovich: Piano Trio No. 2 in E minor, Op. 67 (1944)
Russian composers had a tradition of commemorating the departed with piano trios: Tchaikovsky wrote his trio in memory of Nikolai Rubinstein, Rachmaninoff composed his Trio élégiaque in memory of Tchaikovsky; and Anton Arensky’s celebrated trio commemorates the cellist Karl Davydov. Shostakovich might have been thinking about these antecedents when, upon learning of the death of his best friend Ivan Ivanovich Sollertinsky, he turned to the piano trio. (He had already written one trio in his youth, a brief essay in a post-Romantic style.) Sollertinsky, who had been four years Shostakovich’s senior, was a polymath active in many fields; he died of a heart attack in February 1944, at the age of 42. “I have no words with which to express the pain that racks my entire being,” a devastated Shostakovich wrote to their mutual friend, Isaak Glikman.
In fact, Shostakovich had made sketches for a piano trio in 1943, but these were not used in the work we know today. The E minor trio took what for Shostakovich was an unusually long time to write: he spent much of the spring on the first movement alone, completing the other three during the summer, at the retreat of the Union of Soviet Composers in the village of Ivanovo.
Unlike the Tchaikovsky and Rachmaninoff trios, Shostakovich’s work adheres to the classical four-movement structure (as does the Arensky trio). This layout allowed the composer to write music in many different moods, paying tribute to Sollertinsky’s complex personality. The trio moves from a sad and mysterious opening to a wild and ferocious scherzo, from there to a lament in the form of a passacaglia, followed by the finale.
The cello opens the work with a theme played all in harmonics in an extremely high register. This eerie music, which seems to come from a great distance, later gives way to some angry and powerful outbursts. The second-movement scherzo seems to allude to Sollertinsky’s sense of humor and the many happy moments the two friends had shared. The slow passacaglia (a set of variations over an unchanging bass line) is somber and mournful; it is followed without pause by the dance finale. However, this is obviously not a happy ending. Much of the material is distorted klezmer (Jewish folk music), where the cheerful rhythms are combined with painfully dissonant intervals in the melody. It is no coincidence that Shostakovich started to be drawn to Jewish music during the years of World War II and the Holocaust. One of his favorite composition students, Veniamin Fleischmann, had died in 1941 during the siege of Leningrad. His memory probably played a role in the shaping of the finale, in which the Jewish dance melodies sometimes take on a positively tragic tone. Reminiscences of the earlier movements make the emotional content of the work even more ambivalent, and nothing seems to be resolved when the trio ends with a few broken chords and other isolated musical gestures.
Shostakovich played the piano part when the trio received its world premiere in Leningrad on November 14, 1944. His partners were Dmitri Zyganov (violin) and Sergei Shirinsky (cello) of the Beethoven Quartet.
© 2023 Peter Laki Gilles Vonsattel
saturday, June 17 | 11 am
ClassiCal Family: little Red Riding Hood
Bloomfield township Public library
Sponsored by Gwen & S. Evan Weiner
The Great Lakes Chamber Music Festival’s "Classical Family: Little Red Riding Hood" is an enchanting performance that tells the story of this classic fairy tale through music. The whole family will be captivated by the whimsical and evocative sounds of the instruments as they journey through the beloved story. Admission is free, all ages are welcome, register at greatlakeschambermusic.org.
HespeR QuaRTeT, Shouse ensemble
JoCeLyn (ZeLasko) ConseLva, narrator
Program
Jordyn Davis Songs for Little Red Riding Hood (b. 1995) Hesper Quartet
Songs for Little Red Riding Hood was co-commissioned by the Detroit Chamber Winds & Strings and the Detroit Institute of Arts.
saturday, June 17 | 7 Pm
In Search of the SublIme
Seligman Performing arts center
Sponsored by JPMorgan Chase
Gilles Vonsattel, piano
tessa lark, violin
PhiliP setzer, violin
hsin-Yun huanG, viola
Paul Watkins, cello
Peter WileY, cello
aYa Piano trio, Shouse ensemble
Program
W. A. Mozart Piano Trio in B-flat major, K. 502 (1756-91) allegro
larghetto
allegretto
AYA Piano Trio
Carlos Simon Sleep Well (b. 1986) Vonsattel
Lickety Split
Vonsattel, Watkins
IntermISSIon
Franz Schubert String Quintet in C major, Op. 163, D. 956 (1797-1828) allegro ma non troppo
adagio
scherzo: Presto – trio: andante sostenuto
allegretto
Setzer, Lark, Huang, Watkins, Wiley
This concert will be preceded by a pre-concert talk with Carlos Simon and Paul Watkins at 6:15 p.m.
Program notes
Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart: Piano Trio in B-flat major, K. 502 (1786)
the earliest works for piano, violin, and cello were, in essence, keyboard sonatas with string accompaniment—just like the earliest violin sonatas. in trios, the cello would often merely duplicate the bass line already present in the left hand of the piano, and the violin would offer little more than some ornamental commentary on the piano melody.
continued on page 20
continued from page 19
In Mozart’s five mature trios, written between 1786 and 1788, this is definitely not the case. Although the piano still predominates, the strings make extremely important contributions. Mozart displays the three instruments in ever-changing combinations that represent an entirely new approach to scoring in chamber music. The participants engage in musical conversation; they constantly listen and respond to one another, continue one another’s thoughts and raise new ideas at the appropriate moments.
The Trio in B-flat is as rich in ideas and as profound in its emotional world as anything Mozart wrote during those years, when he was at the height of his creative powers. The opening theme, played in sweet parallel thirds, also functions as the movement’s second theme—an example of the “monothematic” construction that Mozart’s friend Joseph Haydn was especially fond of. This particular construction serves to enhance the motivic unity of the work and to provide a gentle surprise; at the moment when a cultivated audience would expect a new theme, a new version of the old one appears instead. Variety is supplied in other ways: in the instrumental combinations already mentioned, and in the new theme that does eventually materialize, in the movement’s central development section.
In Mozart’s music, the tempo marking Larghetto always indicates a slow movement of great emotional intensity. K. 502 is no exception. It is a deeply expressive statement that takes the form of a rondo. In between returns of the extraordinarily beautiful main theme, new ideas emerge and explore both sides of the movement’s central tonality of E-flat major: up a fifth to B-flat and down a fifth to A-flat. The sonorous low notes of the cello add a whole new dimension to the lyrical exchanges between the piano and the violin.
The brilliant last movement follows a special hybrid design known as the “sonatarondo” that combines the light-heartedness of the rondo with the more intellectual world of the sonata, with some rather extensive thematic transformations in the central development section. © 2023
Peter LakiFranz Schubert: String Quintet in C major, D. 956 (1828)
Did the 31-year-old Schubert know in the summer of 1828 that his time was running out? With his health seriously compromised—it is no secret that he was suffering from syphilis—he composed at a feverish speed, producing a body of work in the months before his death on November 19 that is unmatched even in terms of sheer quantity. The last three piano sonatas, the monumental Mass in E-flat, and the fourteen songs later published as Schwanengesang (“Swan Song”) were all written during this period. What is more, each of these works is a masterpiece of the very first order, richer in both form and expression than anything Schubert had ever written.
The Quintet in C, perhaps the crowning achievement of Schubert’s last year, is a composition like no other in the literature. The vastness of its concept, the extraordinary rhythmic drive and lyrical intensity place this work in a class all by itself. By adding a second cello to the string quartet (and not a second viola as Mozart and Beethoven had done), Schubert gave extra weight to the bass register, increasing the resonance and creating an almost orchestral sound in the most powerful passages. (It is often remarked that Italian composer Luigi Boccherini had written many quintets with two cellos before Schubert; but in fact, Schubert has little in common with Boccherini in either form, sound, or the handling of the instruments.)
The wonders of the Schubert quintet begin right at the outset, with an opening that gathers its momentum gradually, rising by almost imperceptible degrees from the somewhat hesitant first measures to the great explosion that soon follows. The second theme, with its unspeakably sweet parallel thirds, is another wonder, as are the successive waves of rising and subsiding tension in the central portion of the movement.
And what is one to say about the serenely floating opening melody of the slow movement, with its pizzicato (plucked) accompaniment, a single and seemingly endless melodic line that projects a beguiling image of peace and harmony (though not without a tinge of sadness)? A great surprise awaits, however, in the form of a passionately dramatic middle section, whose key, rather unusually, is a half step above the movement’s initial key (F minor as opposed to E major). When the opening melody returns, the first violin adds some exquisite melodic filigree that enhances the excruciating beauty of the melody even more.
The third movement is a greatly expanded Scherzo with dance elements and highly innovative harmonies. As before, contrast is maximized in the middle section, an almost independent slow movement that strikes a tragic tone in a distant key (once more emphasizing the half step above the main key, D-flat against C).
Contrast and ambiguity continue in the finale, which is ostensibly a cheerful rondo; yet it begins in the dark key of C minor, which keeps intruding throughout the movement. At the end of a spirited coda, when one would think that all the tensions have finally been resolved, the dramatic juxtaposition of D-flat against C returns to conclude the quintet in a truly startling manner. © 2023
Peter LakiCOMPOSER’S NOTES
Carlos Simon, Sleep Well
Sleep Well is a short, gracefully flowing work written in 2018 for Peace Dixon, the nephew of the composer. It was commissioned by Abundant Silence, a publishing imprint of the Festival for Creative Pianists, a non-profit, new music and arts education organization that supports the work of 21st Century musical artists and develops unique and creative learning opportunities for pianists of all ages. © Carlos Simon
Carlos Simon, Lickety Split
As a young boy, I worked with my grandfather during the summers paving driveways in Rocky Mount, Virginia. He was a task master. Things had to be done the right way and with haste when he asked for it in his own playful way. He would say, “Pull those weeds up lickety split!” or “Shovel that dirt lickety split!” It was tortuous work during the hot summer days but ultimately proved quite lucrative at the end of the day when my grandfather paid me for the day’s work.
This piece, in its whimsical character, draws on inspiration from that colloquial phrase, Lickety Split, coined in the 1860s. It meant to do something quickly or in a hurry. I used the rhythmic syllabic stresses of the phrase (li-ke-ty split) as a main motif for the piece. To create a playful mood, I used bouncing pizzicato lines in the cello part over wildly syncopated rhythms played by the piano. Harmonically, the central idea moves in parallel motion in thirds between the voices. As the piece develops to an agitated state, both instruments relentlessly rhythmically drive to a climactic ending - done so in a lickety split fashion… © Carlos Simon
Sunday, JunE 18 | 2 pm
Juneteenth Chamber reCital - Carlos simon & Friends
detroit institute of arts
Sponsored by Sandra & Claude Reitelman and Lauren & Dwight Smith
Gilles Vonsattel, piano
njioma GreVious, violin*
james KanG, viola*
Brian Gladlow, cello*
Paul watKins, cello program
CAEN THOMASON-REDUS, flute
NICOLE JOSEPH, soprano
HESPER QUARTET, Shouse ensemble
*Members of the Abeo Quartet
selections to be performed from the following works:
Carlos Simon Loop (b. 1986) Grevious, Kang, Gladlow Sleep Well
Vonsattel
Jasmine Barnes Songs for the African Violet (b. 1991) Joseph, Watkins, Vonsattel
Carlos Simon Between Worlds
Grevious
Elegy Hesper Quartet Lickety Split Watkins, Vonsattel
Shawn Okpebholo On a Poem by Miho Nonaka: Harvard Square (b. 1981) Thomason-Redus
Carlos Simon Generations Simon
COMPOSER’S NOTES
Carlos Simon: Loop
The pandemic of COVID-19 has continued to influence my social, professional and personal life in ways that I never imagined. Day to day life has been like a continuous “loop”; a never-ending quarantine loop. This piece reflects my feelings about the mandated stay-at-home order during the crisis. © Carlos Simon
Carlos Simon: Sleep Well
Sleep Well is a short, gracefully flowing work written in 2018 for Peace Dixon, the nephew of the composer. It was commissioned by Abundant Silence, a publishing imprint of the Festival for Creative Pianists, a non-profit, new music and arts education organization that supports the work of 21st Century musical artists and develops unique and creative learning opportunities for pianists of all ages. © Carlos
SimonJasmine
Barnes: Songs for the African Violet
The African Violet as a flower holds special characteristics similar to Black women: they bloom continuously even throughout the darker months of winter; they come in a variety of vibrant colors and sizes and are notable for their velvety texture; they possess an ability to rid the air of toxic by-products; they’re one of the longest living flowers and with great care can grow for several year; though they are lovely and popular domestic plants, they are at threat of extinction in the wild.
When someone sees a beautiful flower, they often want to savor it by picking it - thus cutting it off from growing just for the flower picker’s selfish wants, not seeing that the act killed the flower, and once the flower is dried up and dead, it’s discarded, forgotten, undesirable. This reflects the treatment of Black Women. Loved for the vibrancy she brings to the world and utilized for pop culture, yet plucked from growth and discarded for dead. “Songs for the African Violet,” by comparison to African Violets, pays homage to Black Women, describing her in ways not oft described and urging the world to take care of her, rather than plucking her from the ground.
© Jasmine BarnesCarlos Simon: Between Worlds
Bill Traylor was born a slave in Alabama in 1853 and died in 1949. He lived long enough to see the United States of America go through many social and political changes. He was an eyewitness to the Civil War, Emancipation, Reconstruction, Jim Crow segregation and the Great Migration. As a self-taught visual artist, his work reflects two separate worlds: rural and urban, black and white, old and new. In many ways the simplified forms in Traylor’s artwork tell of the complexity of his world, creativity, and inspiring bid for self-definition in a dehumanizing segregated culture. This piece is inspired by the evocative nature as a whole and not one piece by Traylor. Themes of mystical folklore, race, and religion pervade Traylor’s work. I imagine these solo pieces as a musical study, hopefully showing Traylor’s life between disparate worlds. © Carlos
Simoncontinued on page
continued from page 21
carlos simon: elegy
This piece is an artistic reflection dedicated to those who have been murdered wrongfully by an oppressive power: namely Trayvon Martin, Eric Garner and Michael Brown. The stimulus for this composing piece came as a result of prosecuting attorney Robert McCulloch announcing that a selected jury had decided not to indict police officer Darren Wilson after fatally shooting an unarmed teenager, Michael Brown, in Ferguson, Missouri.
The evocative nature of the piece draws on strong lyricism and a lush harmonic charter. A melodic idea is played in all the voices of the ensemble at some point of the piece, either whole or fragmented. The recurring ominous motif represents the cry of those struck down unjustly in this country. While the predominant essence of the piece is sorrowful and contemplative, there are moments of extreme hope represented by bright consonant harmonies. © Carlos Simon
carlos simon: Lickety split
As a young boy, I worked with my grandfather during the summers paving driveways in Rocky Mount, Virginia. He was a task master. Things had to be done the right way and with haste when he asked for it in his own playful way. He would say, “Pull those weeds up lickety split!” or “Shovel that dirt lickety split!” It was tortuous work during the hot summer days but ultimately proved quite lucrative at the end of the day when my grandfather paid me for the day’s work.
This piece, in its whimsical character, draws on inspiration from that colloquial phrase, Lickety Split, coined in the 1860s. It meant to do something quickly or in a hurry. I used the rhythmic syllabic stresses of the phrase (li-ke-ty split) as a main motif for the piece. To create a playful mood, I used bouncing pizzicato lines in the cello part over wildly syncopated rhythms played by the piano. Harmonically, the central idea moves in parallel motion in thirds between the voices. As the piece develops to an agitated state, both instruments relentlessly rhythmically drive to a climactic ending - done so in a lickety split fashion… © Carlos Simon
shawn okpebholo: On a Poem by miho Nonaka: harvard square
This composition – inspired by Harvard Square, a poem by the Japanese poet, Miho Nonaka – is a work for solo flute, composed for and premiered by virtuoso flutist Caen Thomason-Redus. It was not my intention to, necessarily, text paint each word of the poem; rather, I tried to evoke the essence of the poem’s meaning. In one word, Nonaka describes her poem as being about “resonance.” A natural term In the music world, the word “resonance,” figuratively speaking, can also mean evoking images, memories and emotions, which she beautifully achieves in Harvard Square. This composition is for the virtuoso flutist, utilizing various extended flute techniques. For example, the composition begins with the flute playing bamboo tones, a way for the modern western flute to sound like a shakuhachi, a Japanese bamboo flute, by using nontraditional fingerings (which I notated in the score). © Shawn
Okpebholocarlos simon: generations
My patriarchal heritage shows three generations of preachers: my great grandfather, Bishop Henry C. Brooks, who began preaching in 1925, my grandfather, Bishop Charles W. Hairston in 1947 and my father Bishop Carlos O. Simon, Sr. in 1994. I chose to use audio clips from past sermons after discovering an old LP and several old cassette tapes of sermons from my great grandfather and grandfather.
I strove to use musical elements that would enhance the message of each proclamation while giving a personal insight to each man. Sow Good Seeds features several sounds that give the impression of something blooming or growing. The Last Days includes a processed Fender Rhodes which my grandfather bought in 1966 at the opening of his church and willed to me at his death in 2010. An ominous bed of dark textures are utilized to create “perilous times”. I used the Hammond organ interspersed throughout Follow the Plan to create a realistic experience of actually being in a worship service. There is a three note (or sometimes chord) motif that appears several times throughout both movements that represent the passion for each one’s vocation. The goal of this work is to recreate the moment at which the sermon was given and to display a musical and cultural heritage that should be celebrated. ©
Carlos SimonTuESdAy, JuNE 20 | 7 pm
EMErsOn strinG QuArtEt: turninG POints
Kirk in the Hills
Sponsored by Nancy Duffy
EMERSON STRING QUARTET prOgrAm
henry Purcell chacony in g minor, Z. 730 (1659-97) Eugene Drucker, first violin
arr. Benjamin Britten (1913-76)
Joseph haydn string Quartet op. 33, no. 5, hob. iii:41 (1732-1809) Vivace assai
Largo e cantabile
Scherzo: Allegro
Finale: Allegretto
Eugene Drucker, first violin
W. A. mozart string Quartet no. 15 in D minor, K. 421/417b (1756-91) Allegro moderato Andante
Menuetto and Trio: Allegretto
Allegretto ma non troppo – Più allegro
Eugene Drucker, first violin intErMissiOn
Ludwig van Beethoven string Quartet no. 8, op. 59, no. 2 “razumovsky” (1770-1827) Molto adagio: Si tratta questo pezzo con molto di sentimento
Allegretto – Maggiore, Thème russe
Finale: Presto
Philip Setzer, first violin
emerson string Quartet Performance sponsors
Purcell/Britten Chacony / Isabel & Lawrence Smith
Haydn Quartet Op. 33, No.5 / Aviva & Dean Friedman
Mozart Quartet K. 421 / Adrienne & Herschel Fink
Beethoven Quartet Op. 59, No. 2 / Gail & Ira Mondry
Major support of the Emerson String Quartet by David Nathanson
PROGRAM NOTES
Henry Purcell (arr. Benjamin Britten): Chacony in G minor (arr.1948, rev.1963)
A chaconne (like its close relative, the passacaglia) is a set of variations over a recurrent ground bass or a recurrent harmonic progression. Purcell was very fond of this form, which he used in several of his stage works, most famously in Dido and Aeneas.
The present “Chacony” (to use the original spelling) is an independent piece, in which the composer handled the variation form with remarkable freedom and virtuosity. In addition to altering the rhythm and ornamenting the melody, he varied the instrumentation as well, occasionally omitting the bass altogether and at one point assigning the bass melody to the treble.
Benjamin Britten had a life-long love for Purcell’s music. He performed and recorded it frequently with his partner, the great tenor Peter Pears, and published many modern editions and realizations which contributed considerably to the Purcell renaissance in the 20th century. © 2023 Peter Laki
Joseph Haydn: String Quartet in G major, Op. 33, No. 5 (1781)
“They are written in a new and special way, for I have not composed any for 10 years.” With these words did Haydn introduce his most recent set of six string quartets in December 1781 to prospective buyers of the sheet music. The exact same sentence appears in three different surviving letters (and there were probably even more similar announcements that have been lost). Some musicologists have dismissed this description as a mere sales pitch, while others have seen it as a sort of stylistic manifesto.
Without falling into either extreme, it cannot be denied that, if we compare the quartets of Op. 33 to Haydn’s previous set, Op. 20 (1772), the differences are enormous. The novelties include a more pervasive technique of motivic development involving sophisticated ways of thematic transformation. Another significant innovation is the appearance of a lighter tone in general, and clear signs of a delicious sense of humor that became, from this point onward, a hallmark of Haydn’s style. Op. 33 includes the quartet known as “The Joke,” where you never know exactly when the piece is over. And it is the set that used to be referred to as Gli Scherzi, for it was here that Haydn, for the first time, replaced the traditional minuet by a scherzo—a witty, fast movement filled with musical surprises of all kinds. The great Haydn scholar H. C. Robbins Landon noted that Haydn had a special reason to be in a good mood in 1781: trapped in a bad marriage, he was in a happy relationship with the Italian singer Luigia Polzelli. (The six quartets of Op. 33 are also occasionally called the “Russian quartets,” because they were published with a dedication to Grand Duke Paul, the future Czar Paul I.)
The very beginning of the G major quartet is a subtle joke: it is a closing figure in an opening position that defines the progress of the movement in a multitude of fascinating ways. Syncopations (strong notes on weak beats), unexpected harmonic changes and general rests punctuate this Vivace assai, which ends exactly as it began, with the closing figure now assuming its proper concluding function.
continued on page 24
continued from page 23
The second movement Largo cantabile is a gorgeous instrumental aria where the first violin reigns supreme throughout, with the expressive accompaniment of the other three instruments. In the Scherzo, the humorous effect is produced by a motif of two beats that runs counter to the triple meter, and a general rest that delays the end of the phrase. The middle section, or “Trio,” is more regular; it provides a brief respite before the return of the Scherzo proper. The last movement is a set of variations on a theme in the form of the siciliano dance. In the course of the variations, the instruments take turns embellishing the theme; the tempo then speeds up for the coda, or concluding section. © 2023 Peter Laki
Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart: String Quartet in D minor, K. 421 (1783)
Mozart did not always compose with the ease and speed one usually associates with his name. Even he had to struggle with some of his compositions. The six string quartets dedicated to Franz Joseph Haydn are a case in point. In paying homage to his older colleague and friend, Mozart subjected himself to an enormous challenge. Haydn had turned the string quartet into one of the most highly developed instrumental genres of his time and, especially after his epoch-making set of six quartets, Op. 33 (1781), he became the undisputed master of the form with an international reputation. Mozart, eager to live up to these high standards, took three years to complete his set of six quartets which constitute his response to Haydn’s Op. 33. Here was music for the connoisseur, sophisticated in technique and complex in elaboration—the work of a genius making a conscious effort to outdo himself (if that is possible at all). For the publication of these quartets, Mozart wrote a beautiful dedicatory letter to Haydn (in Italian, the international language of music) in which he acknowledged the “long and hard work” the quartets had cost him, and asked Haydn to be a loving “father, guide and friend” to these “children” which the composer was sending out into the world to live their own lives.
The D minor quartet was the second in the set of six. Mozart followed Haydn’s custom of including one quartet in a minor key in the group; such works were usually darker, more tragic in tone and more innovative in harmonic language than their “siblings” in major tonalities. The D minor quartet is no exception: its mood is agitated almost from beginning to end. One area of relative calm is the second theme of the first movement, in which the tonality switches to major, in accordance with expectations. Yet when this theme returns in the recapitulation (after a rather stormy development), it undergoes some striking melodic transformations that effectively change its character from lyrical to dramatic.
The second movement is a (mostly) calm Andante in F major. The third is a minuet, but without the usual graceful character of the dance; this minuetto serio (serious minuet) in the tragic key of D minor is filled with chromatic harmonies and complex imitative textures. Its stern atmosphere is relieved by the Trio, in which the first violin plays a tune reminiscent of yodeling (a kind of folk singing from the mountainous regions of Austria, characterized by wide melodic leaps).
The last movement is a set of variations on a theme in which the rhythm of the siciliano dance is imbued with a strong proto-Romantic feeling. Contrary to what happens in many minor key works where the tensions are eased by a final modulation to the major, in this movement the variation in the major remains a passing episode and the work ends on a rather disconsolate note. © 2023 Peter
Ludwig van Beethoven: string Quartet in e minor, op. 59, no. 2 (1806)
The three quartets of Op. 59, known as the “Razumovsky” quartets, were written shortly after the Third Symphony (“Eroica”) and the F minor Piano Sonata (“Appassionata”). In those works, Beethoven made a bold leap into the future: music had never expressed such intense emotions before, nor had the formal conventions of music been changed so radically in such a short time. With Op. 59, Beethoven extended his musical revolution to the quartet medium, producing three masterworks after which the genre was never the same again.
One of the most striking features of Beethoven’s “heroic” style is a reduction of the thematic material to a small number of motifs and an expansion of the techniques that serve to develop those motifs. The most extreme example is probably the first movement of the Fifth Symphony, with its famous four-note theme, but the opening of the E minor quartet is equally striking. Beethoven begins suspensefully with a pair of chords, followed by a short phrase, which is punctuated by rests and repeated a half step higher, immediately calling the E minor tonality into question. Eventually, continuity is restored, but the form remains rather fragmented, reflecting an agitated state of mind. We hear many insistent syncopated rhythms and rapid passages in unison or parallel motion, in dramatic contrast with the occasional gentler moments.
Beethoven inscribed the second movement Molto Adagio with the words Si tratta questo pezzo con molto sentimento (“This piece must be treated with much feeling”). Here is one of his great hymn-like slow movements, with the quiet majesty of the later “Emperor” Concerto and Ninth Symphony—yet entirely within the intimate world of chamber music. The melody is enriched by chromatic harmonies and surrounded by complex figurations. Then, at the end of the movement, all embellishments are stripped away and the melody is stated by the four instruments in bold fortissimo chords, with harsh harmonies and strong accents—before the gentle closing measures end the movement in an idyllic mood.
Beethoven refrained from calling the third movement a “scherzo,” and surely the first section of the movement is too serious to qualify as a “joke.” Yet its syncopated motion and sudden dynamic and harmonic changes are definitely scherzo-like features. The high point of the movement, however, is the second section (which elsewhere would be called “Trio”). In honor of his dedicatee, Beethoven inserted a Russian theme here (marked thème russe in the score). The source of the theme was the important folk-song collection published by Nikolai Lvov and Ivan Prach in 1790. (This melody, “Glory to the Sun,” was famously used again by Mussorgsky in the coronation scene of Boris Godunov.) Beethoven had the four instruments take turns in repeating this melody identically over and over again, against a fast-moving counterpoint that also makes its rounds among the four players. As in several other Beethoven works, the usual A-B-A scheme of the scherzo is expanded to A-B-A-B-A, with the thème russe section appearing twice and the opening section three times.
LakiThe finale is a galloping sonata rondo where Beethoven constantly plays games with our (possibly subconscious) tonal expectations. Seemingly reluctant to establish the home key of E minor, he keeps the first few measures in C major before making a sudden shift just before the end of the phrase. (The last movement of the Fourth Piano Concerto, Op. 58, written around the same time, uses a similar strategy.) The rhythmic momentum never flags, though the galloping pulse is temporarily replaced by quieter motion in the lyrical second theme. Yet the main theme never stays away for very long; and as if the initial Presto tempo weren’t fast enough, Beethoven demands Più presto (“faster”) for the final measures. © 2023 Peter Laki
WEdNESdAy, JuNE 21 | 7:30 pm
tAstinG nOtEs: CiACCOnA n CHEEsE
Mongers’ Provisions – Berkley
Sponsored by Joy & Allan Nachman and Linda Goodman in memory of Dolores Curiel
ROBYN BOLLINGER, violin
prOgrAm
Arr. robyn Bollinger ciaccona: the Bass of time (b. 1991) Bollinger
ThurSdAy, JuNE 22 | 10 Am
BEyOnD tHE nOtEs: MusiC MEEts MinDFulnEss temple Beth El
HESPER QUARTET, Shouse ensemble
Enjoy a 60-minute yoga class for everybody with yoga maestra Gail Mondry, accompanied by the Hesper Quartet.
ThurSdAy, JuNE 22 | 11 Am
sHOusE: BEEtHOvEn & BABAjAniAn st. Matthew’s & st. joseph’s Episcopal Church
AYA PIANO TRIO, Shouse ensemble
PELIA STRING QUARTET, Shouse ensemble
prOgrAm
Arno Babajanian Piano trio in f-sharp minor (1921-83) Largo – Allegro espressivo Andante
Allegro vivace
AYA Piano Trio
Ludwig van Beethoven string Quartet no. 10, op. 74 “harp” (1770-1827) Poco adagio – Allegro
Adagio ma non troppo
Presto – Più presto quasi prestissimo
Allegretto con variazioni
Pelia String Quartet
Thursday, June 22 | 7 pm
EmErson string QuartEt: romantic Visions
Kirk in the Hills
Sponsored by Josette Silver
Shai WoSner, piano emerSon String Quartet program
Felix Mendelssohn String Quartet No. 1 in E-flat major, Op. 12 (1809-47) adagio non troppo – allegro non tardante
Canzonetta: allegretto
andante espressivo
molto allegro e vivace
Eugene Drucker, first violin
Johannes Brahms String Quartet No. 3 in B-flat major, Op. 67 (1833-97) Vivace
andante
agitato (allegretto non troppo)
Poco allegretto con variazioni
Philip Setzer, first violin
intErmission
Antonín Dvor˘ák Piano Quintet No. 2 in A major, Op. 81, B. 155 (1841-1904) allegro, ma non tanto
Dumka: andante con moto
Scherzo (Furiant): molto vivace
Finale: allegro
Wosner, Emerson String Quartet (Philip Setzer, first violin)
Emerson String Quartet Performance Sponsors
mendelssohn Quartet no. 1 / Kathleen Block
Brahms Quartet no. 3 / Martha Pleiss
Dvor˘ák Piano Quintet / Beverly Baker & Edward Treisman
Major support of the Emerson String Quartet by David Nathanson
continued on page 26
continued from page 25
PROGRAM NOTES
Felix Mendelssohn: String Quartet in E-flat major, Op. 12 (1829)
Few composers in the 1820s were more familiar with Beethoven’s recent works than the young Felix Mendelssohn. At a time when Hummel, Clementi, and Spohr were at the height of their fame, not everyone recognized that Beethoven was a greater genius than they; but Mendelssohn had no doubts about that. The opening of his Quartet in E-flat, Op. 12, makes that point absolutely clear with its unmistakable allusion to Beethoven's quartet in the same key (Op. 74, “Harp”), written in 1809, the year of Mendelssohn’s birth. The allusion occurs in the pensive slow introduction to the first movement, which lends extra weight to the Allegro that follows. The latter is a marvel of motivic development: everything flows organically from a simple melodic idea, yet there are always unexpected melodic and harmonic turns to ensure variety.
The second movement is a Canzonetta, that is, neither a minuet nor a scherzo but a “little song”—a “song without words,” as it were. This movement certainly has nothing Beethovenian about it; it is the voice of a young generation, delicate, innovative, and witty. The “trio” (middle section) of the canzonetta is a whirlwind passage that has reminded commentators of the Midsummer Night’s Dream overture, composed three years earlier.
The third movement (Andante espressivo) is a lyrical song that, on two occasions, becomes more agitated (the second time even more so than the first), only to return to its initial tranquil state soon afterwards. It is followed without pause by the finale (Molto allegro e vivace), which—unexpectedly—begins, and for a long time stays, in C minor, adding a touch of Sturm und Drang (“storm and stress,” the name of a dramatic way of writing that was a precursor of Romanticism in some works of Haydn and Mozart). The home key of E-flat isn't reached until shortly before the end; at that point, the melodic material of the first movement returns to provide a feeling of symmetry that is itself a novel feature in the music of the 1820s. The movement, much of which was intense and passionate, ends surprisingly in a hushed pianissimo.
The E-flat major quartet is sometimes referred to as No. 1. In reality, it was written two years after the official “Quartet No. 2,” the A minor work that was published after the E-flat major, as Op. 13. There is also an early E-flat major quartet with no opus number at all, written in 1823 when Mendelssohn was only fourteen and published after the composer's death, so the present work is actually the third string quartet Mendelssohn completed. It was a product of his 1829 journey to the British Isles, which also inspired the “Scottish” Symphony and the Hebrides Overture. The manuscript is dated “14th September, 1829, London.” © 2023 Peter Laki
Johannes Brahms: String Quartet No. 3 in B-flat major, Op. 67 (1875)
Much ink has been spilled over whether Brahms was a “conservative” or a “progressive” composer—that is, whether he must be faulted for not going along with the radical ideas of his older contemporaries Liszt and Wagner, or whether he should be given more credit for his novel structural and harmonic solutions. One way out of this academic quandary would be to realize that the two adjectives in quotation marks are really two sides of the same coin: Brahms’s genius lay in the way he was able to innovate within an existing framework, and to reconcile his originality with the tradition that was sacred to him.
Few works show this duality better than his third and last string quartet, so daring in a lot of ways and still so comfortable in observing the classical rules of the genre. After two turbulent and dramatic minor key quartets (Op. 51), Brahms composed one that is mostly light and happy, though by no means simple, in tone—and Brahms once said that it was his favorite quartet of the three. The composer dedicated the work to his friend Theodor Engelmann, whose wife, Emma, was an accomplished pianist.
The opening theme of the first movement is a direct descendant of Mozart’s “Hunt” Quartet (they have similar motivic materials, and share the same meter and the same key). Yet within a few measures, rhythmic complications arise that are never found in Mozart. Most unusually, the meter changes in the folksy second theme and for a short while, two different meters are heard simultaneously. The development section covers an enormous range of keys and characters. And yet, the end of the movement manages to settle happily back into the classical world as if nothing had happened.
The second-movement Andante contains one of Brahms’s most glorious melodies: it has an unusually wide range and draws an extremely long musical arc. It is followed by a typical Brahmsian moment with powerful angular rhythms, played together by all four instruments. A beguilingly beautiful and rather adventurous development section leads back to a restatement of the opening melody, followed by an idyllic coda.
In the third movement, the viola plays “first fiddle”; the other three instruments accompany with their mutes on. An expressive melody in the style of Brahms’s Liebeslieder-Walzer (“love-song waltzes”) opens the movement which is in ABA form. The central “B” presents little contrast: it is another sensuous waltz melody led, once again, by the viola.
The last movement is a classical theme and variations with many subtle surprises. First of all, the melodious theme has a slight but very noticeable irregularity in that its second half is two measures shorter than the first. This asymmetry is maintained in all the variations, which at first follow the classical pattern of introducing faster figurations and giving each instrument a turn in playing the melody. The later variations go farther and farther afield until we reach a point, in a fairly distant key, where the melody seems entirely to dissolve in a series of chords accompanied by a pizzicato—plucked—bass line, itself alternating between the cello and the viola. It is a variation where timbre, or sound color, seems to take over as the most prominent musical parameter, more important than melody and rhythm!
After this magical moment, the opening melody of the first movement unexpectedly returns, and we realize that its melodic outline is related to that of the variation theme. The two themes are brilliantly combined in the final section but once again, after so many complicated compositional maneuvers, the work ends in a simple and straightforward manner. © 2023 Peter Laki
Antonín Dvor˘ák: Piano Quintet in A major, Op. 81 (1887)
The German music publisher Fritz Simrock felt that the Czech form of his star composer’s first name, Antonín, did not look good on the title page of a respectable German score. He tried hard to persuade Dvor˘ák to use the German form, Anton, instead, but the patriotic composer insisted on the two extra letters. They finally struck a compromise by abbreviating the name to a neutral and non-committal Ant.
In a way, Dvor˘ák’s entire life and career revolved around the issue of Anton vs. Antonín. As a proud Bohemian whose country was part of the Austrian Empire, he always resisted the German culture of the rulers. And yet, the road to recognition led through Simrock and the German-speaking world—at least until Dvor˘ák was able to bypass that world by going first to England and then to the United States. Still, Dvor˘ák was much more than a Czech nationalist. His unique contribution lies precisely in the fact that he was able to express his Czech identity within what was essentially a Germanic tradition – forms of symphonic and chamber music he had inherited from Beethoven, Schubert and Schumann.
In his greatest works, Dvor˘ák found the perfect balance between the nationalist Antonín and the universalist Anton. The A major Quintet, for instance, overflows with beautiful melodies in a Czech folk style, and contains both a dumka and a furiant (see below). At the same time, it is without a doubt the only successor to the great piano quintets of Schumann and Brahms that is worthy of the great models in every respect.
The first movement opens with an unforgettable cello melody. The second theme, equally lyrical, is introduced by the viola. Both themes are eventually developed by all five players and acquire considerable rhythmic energy in the process, although the character of the entire movement still remains predominantly lyrical. Only the coda strikes, all of a sudden, a more heroic tone.
The second movement is a dumka—a type of melancholy folk song, originally from Ukraine, that inspired Dvor˘ák in many of his works, most famously in the “Dumky” Piano Trio of 1891. The trio contains six dumka movements, greatly varied in tempo and mood. The dumka of the A major Quintet manages to fit some of the contrasting characters into a single movement: the brooding Andante con moto of the opening is followed by a second idea in a more fluid tempo. The opening melody is heard again, first in the original tempo and then in the form of a Vivace variation. The first two segments (the brooding opening and the more fluid second idea) return, and the movement ends molto tranquillo (“very calmly”).
The third movement is titled Scherzo-Furiant—a double label reflecting, once again, the Anton-Antonín duality. To German ears, this movement fits neatly in the category of the scherzo, familiar since the days of Beethoven. Yet Dvor˘ák’s immediate inspiration was the Czech folk dance, the furiant, whose pedigree was established by Bedr˘ich Smetana, whose landmark opera The Bartered Bride contains a classic example. The most important characteristic of the furiant is its metric ambiguity resulting from the frequent duple articulations within an essentially triple meter. Dvor˘ák’s furiant in the quintet is based on two dance melodies, one energetic and one more tender. The trio (middle section) is in a slower tempo but its theme is derived from the energetic motif heard earlier. The recapitulation of the Scherzo is much abbreviated.
The last movement has the inflection of another folk dance, the polka, embedded in a rondo scheme with lyrical episodes and a lively fugato (section with contrapuntal imitation). The movement has a coda where the motion momentarily slows down, only to pick up again and end on an exuberant note. ©
2023 Peter LakiDavid Michael Audio is Detroit’s premier audio provider. Representing the finest audio brands available, we promise you the ultimate musical listening experience. Come let us help you recreate tonights musical experience in your own home.
David Michael Audio 4341 Delemere Court Royal Oak, Michigan 48073 248.290.8829 www.davidmichaelaudio.com
Representing Accuphase, Aurender, Boulder, Chord Electronics, Devore Fidelity, Estelon, Harbeth, Heed, Innuos, Kabala Sosna, Leben, Line Magnetic, Magico, MSB Technology, Nagra, Spendor, Sugden, Totem Acoustic, Vimberg and
Friday, June 23 | 11 am
Musical chairs with PhiliP setzer
temple Beth ei
Sponsored by Isabel & Lawrence Smith
PhiliP Setzer, Shouse Institute Director/violin
Abeo QuArtet, Sphinx Apprentice Ensemble
AYA PiAno trio, Shouse ensemble
heSPer QuArtet, Shouse ensemble
PeliA String QuArtet, Shouse ensemble
All Shouse institute musicians mix and match as they take turns performing in a rotating ensemble under the direction of Shouse institute Director Philip Setzer.
Friday, June 23 | 7 Pm
audio/Visual with alVin waddles
Marygrove conservancy
Sponsored by Bridget & Michael Morin
imagination amplifies across artistic boundaries. Detroit legend Alvin Waddles shines his incredible light onto interesting turning points in the works of composers ranging from Scriabin and Stravinsky to Fats Waller.
COmPOSer’S nOTeS
Alvin WAddles
An artist's journey is rarely a straight path. Sometimes a change in direction is wrought by maturation, inspiration or even adversity. Join me for an exploration of several composers who reached stylistic and personal turning points in their effort to find a road less traveled.
Friday, June 23 | 7:30 Pm
SoundS of Spring
Kerrytown Concert House
Ying Li, piano*
Shai WoSner, piano robYn boLLinger, violin njioma greviouS, violin**
jameS Kang, viola**
brian gLadLoW, cello**
Program
*Member of AYA Piano Trio
**Member of Abeo Quartet
Franz Schubert Rondo in A major, Op. 107, D. 951 (1797-1828) allegretto quasi andantino
Li, Wosner
Ludwig van Beethoven Sonata for Violin and Piano No. 5 in F major, Op. 24 (1770-1827) “Spring”
allegro
adagio molto espressivo
Scherzo: allegro molto
rondo: allegro ma non troppo
Wosner, Bollinger
inTErMiSSion
W. A. Mozart Piano Quartet No. 1 in G minor, K. 478 (1756-91) allegro
andante
rondo: allegro
Wosner, Grievous, Kang, Gladlow
PROGRAM NOTES
Franz Schubert: Rondo in A major, Op. 107, D. 951 (1828)
The piano duet is one of the most intimate forms of chamber music. Two players sharing the same instrument have to sit pretty close to one another on the bench to reach all the necessary notes. In the early 19th century, piano duets were particularly popular in Vienna, since there were many accomplished amateurs who enjoyed playing such works at home. It was an area where Schubert was greatly successful during his lifetime, and he wrote more piano duets than almost any other great composer. Yet his four-hand works are significant not only because of their quantity but also because of the great care he lavished on them.
The present rondo dates from the last year of Schubert’s life and was published the year after his untimely death. Its gorgeous main melody undergoes a number of subtle transformations and alternates with some slightly more animated episodes that, however, never seriously alter the serene mood of the composition.
© 2023 Peter LakiLudwig van Beethoven: Sonata No. 5 in F major, Op. 24, “Spring” (1801)
What can we say about Beethoven’s “Spring” Sonata, except that it is a happy day when we get to hear it? The nickname is not by the composer, but it is entirely appropriate, because the warmth and serenity the work projects in all four of its movements. Beethoven the lyricist sings in a voice that, in its gentleness, is no less powerful than the thundering outbursts of his heroic period; his unmistakable personality is present just as strongly in this gentle sonata as it is in the great dramatic works.
The sonata opens with one of Beethoven’s most endearing and most unforgettable melodies. Subsequent themes in the movement show a little more musical “muscle,” but it is more like a soft breeze rustling the leaves than a strong wind, let alone a storm.
The second-movement Adagio is based on a single melody of rare delicacy, played in turn by both instruments. The third-movement Scherzo is definitely Beethoven’s shortest sonata movement: it fits on a single page in the score. It grows from a simple rhythmic idea, repeated constantly by the piano, with a characteristic offbeat response from the violin. The movement’s Trio (middle section), which takes only about twenty seconds to play, is a continuous rush up and down the scale, in the form of two highly condensed musical phrases.
The melodious rondo theme of the finale is followed by an equally lyrical first episode. It is the central second episode that provides the main contrast, as it is the only extended minor-key section in the entire sonata. It features some dramatic syncopations, excited triplet figures, and some expressive chromatic inflections in the melody (with half-steps not normally part of the scale). However, these tensions prove to be only temporary, and the peaceful earlier themes return. The short coda only confirms the joyful and sunny atmosphere that has prevailed throughout the entire composition. ©
Peter LakiWolfgang Amadeus mozart: Piano Quartet in g minor, K. 478 (1785)
Mozart used the combination of piano and three string instruments only twice, but in those two masterworks (K. 478 and K. 493) he invented a new genre that found many followers in the 19th century. During his years in Vienna, he liked to play chamber music on the viola; that may be the reason why he chose to expand the familiar piano-trio format to include his favorite instrument.
The G minor quartet, written in 1785, has received particular attention on account of its opening key, which Mozart always reserved for works in a dark, passionate, proto-Romantic tone. The opening movement of the quartet is no exception; it is one of Mozart’s most turbulent and emotionally charged Allegros. The lyrical second movement and the final Rondo continue in a different vein: they are both graceful, melodious, and firmly anchored in the major mode.
This work was one of three piano quartets the Viennese music publisher Hoffmeister commissioned from Mozart. But since it didn’t sell well, Hoffmeister canceled the commission. The second quartet was eventually published by a different publisher; the projected third quartet, alas, was never written. © 2023 Peter Laki
Saturday, June 24 | 6:30 Pm
EmErson string QuartEt: Final FarEwEll seligman Performing arts Center
Sponsored by Linda & Maurice Binkow
EmErson string QuartEt Program
Maurice Ravel String Quartet in F major (1875-1937) allegro moderato – très doux
assez vif – très rythmé
très lent
Vif et agité
Philip Setzer, first violin
Anton Webern Six Bagatelles for String Quartet, Op. 9 (1883-1945) mäßig (moderato)
Leicht bewegt (Easily moved)
Ziemlich fließend (Pretty Fluent)
sehr langsam (Very slowly)
Äußerst langsam (Extremely slow)
Fließend (Fluently)
Eugene Drucker, first violin
Béla Bartók String Quartet No. 2, BB 75, Op. 17, Sz. 67 (1881-1945) moderato
allegro molto, capriccioso
Lento
Philip Setzer, first violin
intErmission
Sarah Kirkland Snider Drink the Wild Ayre (2023) (b. 1973) Eugene Drucker, first violin
Dmitri Shostakovich String Quartet No. 12 in D-flat major, Op. 133 (1906-75) moderato-allegretto
allegretto-adagio-moderato
Eugene Drucker, first violin
Emerson String Quartet Performance Sponsors
ravel Quartet / Franziska Schoenfeld
Webern six Bagatelles / Christine Goerke
Bartók Quartet no.2 / Marguerite Munson Lentz & David Lentz
Kirkland snider “Drink the Wild ayre” / Virginia & Michael Geheb
shostakovich Quartet no. 12 / Kathleen O’Toole Schein & Randolph Schein
Major support of the Emerson String Quartet by David Nathanson
cLosing night: fAreWeLL recePtion At AnDiAmo
Sponsored by James Tocco
As the Emerson String Quartet marks another Turning Point, the GLCMF invites you to meet the artists at a special farewell reception at Andiamo Restaurant, starting at 9:15 p.m. Call 248-559-2097 for more information.
Tickets are $125 each.
PROGRAM NOTES
Maurice Ravel: String Quartet in F major (1902-03)
Ravel was twenty-seven years old when he wrote his first and only string quartet. He was still, at least nominally, a student, as he was auditing Gabriel Fauré’s composition class at the Paris Conservatoire. But he had been active as a composer for years, with numerous public performances under his belt. He had failed, however, to win a prize from the Conservatoire, which was a condition for graduation. In particular, the prestigious Prix de Rome continued to elude Ravel, who was eliminated from the contest no fewer than five times. This situation became more and more ludicrous and it finally led to a much-publicized scandal in 1905. The director of the Conservatoire had to resign, and Ravel confirmed his status as one of the leading French composers of his generation.
Ravel’s string quartet—dedicated “to my dear master Gabriel Fauré”—is clearly modeled on Debussy’s celebrated Quatuor from 1893, yet Ravel displays a sense of color and melody that is all his own. To both composers, the string quartet as a medium suggested—in fact, demanded—adherence to classical tradition. Yet nothing was farther from them than academicism of any kind. The defining characteristic of both works is precisely the tension between the classical forms and a positively non-classical sensitivity that is manifest at every turn.
Melody, harmony and rhythm are usually thought of as the most important ingredients of music. In Ravel’s string quartet, written at the beginning of the 20th century, a fourth element, sound, appears as a factor of equal importance. The alternation of playing techniques (pizzicato, con sordino, arpeggio, bow on the fingerboard) is as crucial to the unfolding of the piece as the alternation of themes. Their succession, especially in the second and third movements, creates a musical form of its own, entirely non-traditional this time.
In the first movement, classical sonata form is realized with great clarity and ingenuity. Note the characteristic pianissimo rallentando (extremely soft and slow playing) at the end of the movement, similar to the analogous moment in Ravel’s Piano Trio of 1914. (On the other hand, the opening movement of Debussy’s string quartet ends with a loud and fast coda.)
The second movement of Ravel’s quartet is based on the contrast between two
themes of opposite character: one pizzicato (plucked), and one bien chanté (“sing out!”), with bow. Again, it seems that the movement looks into the future (ahead to the Piano Trio of 1914) rather than into the past (back to the Debussy quartet). The middle section, in which all four instruments use mutes, is an expressive slow movement in miniature, with subtle variations on both scherzo themes.
The unique beauty of the third movement emerges by fits and starts, as it were, through the juxtaposition of segments in different tempos, keys, and meters. An expressive melody, whose primary exponent is the viola, is interrupted by memories of the first movement’s opening theme. After a more animated middle section, culminating in a passionate outburst, the initial slow tempo returns with its exquisite harmonies.
The last movement is based on an ostinato (“stubbornly” returning pattern) in an asymmetrical 5/8 meter. After a while, this ostinato yields to a more regular 3/4 which, once more, contains echoes of the first movement. A different musical character— the first aggressive, the second more lyrical—corresponds to each of these two meters. Their contrast carries the movement forward, right up to the singularly forceful conclusion. © 2023 Peter Laki
Anton Webern: Six Bagatelles for String Quartet, Op. 9 (1913)
The three masters of the second Viennese school—Arnold Schoenberg, Alban Berg, and Anton Webern—had a lifelong devotion to the string quartet medium, which inspired them to formulate their musical thoughts with the utmost clarity. Their quartets span all three phases of their parallel developments, from the early tonal works to free atonality and then to the compositions using the twelve-tone system. The Six Bagatelles represent the summit of the aphoristic style Webern developed in the early 1910s. They are the shortest works of a composer who always favored extreme brevity. Webern wrote about the way he composed the piece:
I had the feeling that when the twelve tones have been played the piece is over...In my sketchbook I wrote out the chromatic scale and crossed off individual notes. Why? Because I had convinced myself that the note was already there. It sounds grotesque, incomprehensible, and it was incredibly difficult. The inner ear decided absolutely rightly that the person who had written out the chromatic scale and crossed off individual notes was no fool. In short, a law came into being. Until all twelve notes have appeared none of them must appear again... We were not then conscious of the principle but had been sensing it for a long time.
We can’t stress too strongly that Webern, as always, made the inner ear the supreme judge. The quote shows that the twelve-tone system, as codified some years later by Schoenberg, was not created by a purely cerebral process: it was the ear that demanded that all twelve notes be used before one of them was repeated. (In spite of this systematic use of the twelve pitches, the work is not a “twelve-tone” piece strictly speaking, since the pitches do not form a row and are not subject to inversion, retrogradation and transposition as full-blown serial theory would entail.)
The idea that the lifespan of the piece is related to the gradual unfolding of a twelve-tone sequence is highly significant even if the piece isn’t exactly over after only twelve notes. In the first bagatelle for instance, we have heard all twelve tones by measure 3, but the movement consists of a total of 10 measures. In the remaining
seven measures, Webern draws musical “consequences” from his first presentation of the twelve notes, varying and developing the motivic relationships he set up there. As Schoenberg put it so beautifully in his often-quoted preface to the Bagatelles: Every glance can be expanded into a poem, every sigh into a novel. But to express a novel in a single gesture, joy in a single breath—such concentration can only be found where self-pity is lacking in equal measure.
What’s more, each bagatelle is a different “novel.” By varying the tempo, the playing technique and the character of the gestures, Webern created considerable variety within the cycle. Almost every note carries a special performance instruction, whether a new dynamic marking, an accent, or a particular way of playing (plucked, harmonics, near the bridge, with mute); this extraordinary detail work gives the piece a unique atmosphere.
Shostakovich’s biography resembles nothing more than a wild roller-coaster ride with the dramatic ups and downs of highest praise and harshest condemnation. After the age of sixty, his official troubles with the Soviet regime seemed to be over and he could have finally begun to enjoy his celebrity status if his health hadn’t seriously deteriorated in the meantime. Living in the shadow of death, Shostakovich turned increasingly inward and the tone of his music became more intensely personal than ever before. At the same time, he no longer felt the need for any concessions to politicians or anyone else. © 2023 Peter Laki
Béla Bartók: String Quartet No. 2 (1917)
Bartók’s Second Quartet was written during a time of personal and artistic crisis in the composer’s life, due in part to the hardships of World War I, and in part to the vehement opposition to his music on the part of the Hungarian critics. In fact, the composer’s environment became so hostile that in 1912 he decided to withdraw from the musical life of Budapest and to move to a relatively distant suburb. A mood of pessimism took hold of Bartók during these years – witness the tragic endings of the Four Pieces for Orchestra and the Suite for Piano, Op. 14, and the two dark song cycles Opp. 15 and 16, all from the years immediately preceding the Second Quartet. The Second Quartet, too, ends with a desolate slow movement, preceded by a Moderato filled with nostalgic longing and an extended, ferocious dance.
In addition to these extreme contrasts between the movements, the first movement contains its own inner polarity, between the opening theme (a languid melody with ever-widening intervals) and a second, “bittersweet” idea that appears only twice, harmonized in a much more consonant way. The contrast of these two themes could correspond to an imagined contrast between a melancholy state of mind and the world of ideal dreams. Powerful surges and desperate climaxes punctuate this movement which roughly follows the outlines of sonata form. One of the most memorable moments occurs shortly before the end: a five-note motif, played by all four instruments in a menacing, fortissimo unison, turns out to be identical to the beginning of the “bittersweet” theme, which immediately follows, ushering in a coda in which both themes are unites in a farewell gesture of great tenderness.
For most of its duration, the second movement has a single interval—the minor third—for its theme. It is hammered home in a relentless ostinato in which Hungarian musicologist János Kárpáti saw a reflection of the Arabic drumming Bartók had heard continued on page 32
continued from page 31
during his visit to Biskra, Algeria in 1913. This ostinato is developed in spectacular ways, in turn serious and comic. Toward the middle of the movement, the tempo slows down for a while and a lyrical melody appears, only to be brushed aside by the returning ostinatos that become wilder and wilder to the end. The concluding fortissimo unison recalls the similar passage from the first movement mentioned above. Only this time there is no relief in a dreamlike conclusion; the third movement that follows is one of the darkest pieces of music Bartók ever wrote.
Isolated melodic fragments, played with mutes, set a desolate stage, preparing the appearance of the melody modeled after a certain type of Hungarian folksong of a mournful character. The contours of the melody, and the fact that the phrase is repeated a fifth higher, are reminiscent of folk music, but the chromatic inflections of the theme speak an intensely personal language of Bartók’s own. In fact, the pitches derive from the languid opening theme of the first movement. The two kinds of sadness—the personal grief of the composer and the communal lament of folksong—reinforce one another as the music moves through successive stages of anxiety and despair. The final sonority of the work is the same minor third that figured so prominently in the second movement—now played twice, pizzicato (plucked) by the viola and cello, muffled and austere. © 2023 Peter Laki
Dmitri Shostakovich: Quartet No. 12 in D-flat major, Op. 133 (1968)
The present work is the second in a cycle of four (Nos. 11-14) dedicated to each of the members of the Beethoven String Quartet, who were old friends of Shostakovich’s who had premiered all of his quartets except for No. 1. The Twelfth Quartet was the composer’s personal gift to first violinist Dmitri Tsyganov (1903-1992). It is in two extended movements, each of which further subdivides into several smaller sections. The composer himself called this quartet “symphonic” in its conception.
In commentaries of this work, one particular feature is mentioned more frequently than any other, namely the use of twelve-tone themes throughout the work. The very opening features a theme containing all twelve tones, but Shostakovich doesn’t manipulate his theme the way the members of the Second Viennese School manipulated their tone rows. Shostakovich’s theme remains a melody, contrasting with other melodies of a more traditional diatonic type. In a way, the entire work can be seen as a kind of struggle between these two melodic worlds.
The gloomy Moderato introduction soon gives way to a more dance-like Allegretto section in 3/4 time; the two characters consistently alternate throughout the movement. The second movement begins as a scherzo (of the sarcastic Shostakovichian variety), incorporates an extended, and extremely stark, Adagio section and concludes with a finale that integrates all the elements previously heard. The quartet ends with one of those ambivalent “resolutions” where all the tonal tensions are smoothed out yet something deeply disturbing remains. © 2023 Peter Laki
COMPOSER'S NOTES
Sarah Kirkland Snider, Drink the Wild Ayre (2023)
Drink the Wild Ayre is my second string quartet. I wrote my first over twenty years ago, while poring over recordings by the Emerson String Quartet. At that time, I was new to composition and bought every CD of theirs I could find, obsessively studying
counterpoint and voice-leading via their recordings. Their performances became my benchmark for the masterpieces they recorded; their sounds became synonymous, in my mind, with the composer’s intent. For me, theirs was the definitive interpretation of all the great string quartets in history.
So, when the invitation to write this piece came in — the Emerson's final commission, to be performed during this, their final season — I nearly fell off my chair. I am still awestruck and humbled to have written this piece for some of my earliest heroes. The title is a playful nod to one of the most famous quotes by their transcendentalist namesake essayist/philosopher/poet, Ralph Waldo Emerson: “Live in the sunshine, swim the sea, Drink the wild air's salubrity.” An ayre is a song-like, lyrical piece. The title seemed an apt reference not only to the lilting, asymmetrical rhythms of the music’s melodic narrative, but also to the questing spirit, sense of adventure, and fullhearted passion with which the Emerson has thrown itself into everything it has done for the past 47 years. Here’s to the singular magic of these artistic giants, and the new adventures that await them.
© Sarah Kirkland SniderEmerson
The Great Lakes Chamber Music Festival remains dedicated to promoting the arts to its surrounding community through performances, workshops and collaboration.
junE 16 | lunCHEOn in COnvErsAtiOn WitH sEnGHOr rEiD
Sponsored by Beverly Baker & Dr. Edward Treisman
The Morning Glories concert will be followed by a reception with Festival Visual Artist, Senghor Reid at 1 p.m. Reid draws inspiration for his paintings from current events and from his hometown of Detroit.
junE 17 | ClAssiCAl FAMily: littlE rED riDinG HOOD
Sponsored by Gwen & S. Evan Weiner
The Great Lakes Chamber Music Festival’s "Classical Family: Little Red Riding Hood" is an enchanting performance that tells the story of this classic fairy tale through music. The whole family will be captivated by the whimsical and evocative sounds of the instruments as they journey through the beloved story. Admission is free, all ages are welcome, register at greatlakeschambermusic.org.
junE 17 | in COnvErsAtiOn WitH CArlOs siMOn
Join Stone Composer-in-Residence Carlos Simon and Artistic Director Paul Watkins for a pre-concert talk prior to the In Search of the Sublime concert. This discussion will begin at 6:15 p.m.
junE 20 | syMPOsiuM At Wsu
MEDiCAl sCHOOl | ClOsED EvEnt
Sponsored by the Charles H. Gershenson Trust
Members of the Shouse Institute will present a workshop to students in the Wayne State University School of Medicine. In partnership with WSU faculty, the musicians will perform and demonstrate how they communicate nonverbally. The goal is to create an opportunity for medical students to observe and learn lessons in nonverbal communication, an “art-form” in which chamber musicians must excel to survive.
ACCEnt POntiAC PErFOrMAnCE AnD WOrKsHOP | ClOsED EvEnt
Sponsored by Mr. & Mrs. B.N. Bahadur
A Shouse ensemble will host a workshop for Accent Pontiac students, helping them realize their own compositions and interpret each other’s works. Accent Pontiac focuses on strengthening Pontiac’s youth and community through equitable access to intensive and consistent music-making.
sEniOr CEntErs OF OAKlAnD COunty | ClOsED EvEnts
Sponsored by the Mary Thompson Foundation and the Phillip and Elizabeth Filmer Memorial Charitable Trust
In line with our efforts to expand our Great Lakes family, the Festival is resuming in-person satellite performances at Senior Centers across Southeastern Michigan. Out of an abundance of caution, these events had to be paused during the height of the pandemic, but are now returning thanks to our generous supporters. During these special events Shouse ensembles will perform and engage with the seniors in our community.
ArTiSTiC ENCOuNTErS
Sponsored by Barbara & Paul Goodman
Bloomfield Township Public Library
1099 Lone Pine Road, Bloomfield Township, MI 48302
FREE|Register at greatlakeschambermusic.org/artistic-encounters
The Catherine Filene Shouse Chamber Music Institute, led by violinist Philip Setzer of the Emerson String Quartet, provides a platform for emerging professional ensembles. Artistic Encounters are public coachings for Shouse Institute fellows in a setting similar to a masterclass. You are invited to attend these Artistic Encounters to get a behind-the-scenes look at what it takes to be a professional musician.
PHiliP sEtzEr | junE 12 At 11 AM
GillEs vOnsAttEl | junE 14 At 11 AM
sHAi WOsnEr | junE 19 At 11 AM
EMErsOn strinG QuArtEt | junE 21 At 11 AM
Festival stories
Enjoy our innovative collection of virtual programming online by visiting us at: https://greatlakeschambermusic.org/watch-and-listen/
Content and community beyond the Festival’s live events
This fall, we will showcase programming from the 2023 Festival! Interwoven with behind-the-scenes footage and interviews, we are taking viewers beyond what is typically accessible at live events. Enjoy the passion and artistry that moves us to collectively experience the fullest range and depth of emotion with every crescendo, turn of the page, and stroke of the bow.
The Great Lakes Chamber Music Festival family would like to express our congratulations and well wishes to the Emerson String Quartet as they wrap up their farewell tour. The quartet is performing three concerts this season, showcasing their most essential repertoire.
This year's Festival theme, Turning Points, pays tribute to the quartet's monumental career and highlights crucial moments in chamber music history. As they prepare for their final performance at the Festival, our family takes a moment to reflect on the numerous Turning Points the quartet has inspired over the years.
The Emersons first performed at the Festival in 2003,
celebrating our 10th Anniversary. The group premiered "Shostakovich and the Black Monk: A Russian Fantasy" in 2017 and returned for the widely attended Beethoven String Quartet Cycle in 2019.
Two of the quartet's members, Paul Watkins and Philip Setzer, have played critical roles in the Festival's growth. Watkins serves as the Festival's Artistic Director, and Setzer directs our Shouse Institute, a program that supports emerging ensembles, offering connections, mentorship, and public coaching sessions.
We extend our warmest congratulations and well wishes to the quartet members, past and present, as they embark on new adventures and individually continue to inspire audiences around the world. We are honored to have had the privilege of hosting them at our Festival, and we thank them from the bottom of our hearts for their unwavering dedication to advancing the art of chamber music.