Memorandum from Stephen Holmes To
:
MHKs, MLCs, Deemsters, Mrs President, Adam Wood, John Quinn
Date
:
26th April 2013
Subject
:
Father told: Stop Court Claims. Father replies – STOP ABUSING CHILDREN!
Since the Manx Independent publicised a “custody and contact battle” on 18 th April 2013, I have decided to publicised the real battle – between AK Williamson and Stephen Holmes with AK Williamson as “the Charlatan Deemster”. On 5th November 2004 Williamson issued the document below (left) –
The important part of this document is the policy statement – Respondent have indirect 'contact' with the said children. By sending the false instrument to the Police (and the head-teacher) the charlatan judge stated that the police could interpret the declaration as “some kind of injunction empowering arrest” and that is how it was interpreted for almost three years. Then on 26th October 2007, as reported in the on-line judgment (courts.im – J1356), the High Court confirmed that there was no legitimacy to this “order” – in simple words; it is a false document and has no value. So deputy Deemster AK Williamson issued a declaration that had no basis in law in the Isle of Man, sent it to the Police, and the father was arrested and detained on several occasions. When it was finally admitted to be unlawfully created, the High Court acted in a biased and unfair manner by making “no fair criticism” of the charlatan who issued the unlawful declaratory order. So now the “Father/Respondent” is getting back at the High Court of “justice” of the Isle of Man. On 2 nd September 1994 the Isle of Man accepted that all children in the Island have all the rights listed in the United Nations Child Rights Convention, including the right to a family life with both parents. What justification did Williamson have for declaring “indirect contact” as authorised by an order from England? That it had been registered on 4 th November 2004. But it was not so registered on 4th November 2004, so there was no legitimate basis upon which the Deputy Deemster could have made the order which he did. Stephen Holmes had no family life with Katie and Ben Holmes for three years and Katie and Ben had no family life with their Manx father, Stephen Holmes, for three years because Williamson had “ordered” it to be so on the false document / false instrument issued above that was circulated to the Departments of Home Affairs and of Education (and within Social Services and the General Registry) and it was “universally” accepted as being good and proper when it is in fact a false instrument fraudulently misrepresenting the actuality of the state of affairs – that is that Katie and Ben should have a family life with “the Respondent.” On 28th November 2012 I appealed against a decision and “order” made by Deemster Roberts, and during seven weeks of research and preparation, I discovered that every children matter in the High Court since 1st October 1992 has been misgoverned. We have good children law (the CYPA 2001) but charlatans in the High Court of “justice” to interpret it and manage cases under this modern children law. It is time that the Deemsters actually did the right thing for Manx children and stopped abusing them.