Memorandum from G. Stephen Holmes To
:
David Doyle, Andrew Corlett, Andrew Williamson, John Quinn, Adam Wood, Stephen Cregeen, Paul Coppell, Stephen Robertson – published on www.
Date
:
18th December 2014
Subject
:
Christmas is for sharing: I wish to share a photograph with you “officers”.
On 1st April 2014 I took the following photograph – it is of a “court file” and has been edited slightly [the annotation “See also Div. 2007/251” has been removed from the face if the file] –
The name HOLMES has been added by me because Advocate Paul Morris added it on 13/12/2011. The only reference in a “court hearing” to this File is on the For The Record html file of the so-called hearing on 5th November 2004 when Williamson issued a “declaratory order” [referred to on FTR as a declarity order] that had no basis in law! The FTR record appears below. All I want to know from you recipients to this memorandum is “Why was this file opened?” The original colour image of the FILE (taken on 1 st April 2014 in view of a representative from the General Registry, the office of records of the High Court) is on issuu.com/gsholmes/docs According the Child Custody Act 1987 any request to register orders from “any court in the United Kingdom” must come from the court that made the order, not from a member of the public. The “custody order” must be accompanied by all supporting documentation, not “nothing at all”. In a letter to Mannin Chambers dated 25 th July 2007, reference HH/FK/07-066, R.Peter Corkhill admitted that such documents did not exist, and went on to confirm that the process undertaken by “this office” had not been “in accordance with the requirements of” an Act of Tynwald – the CCA 1987. So why was this file opened? Why are there documents in it? Why have the documents not been expunged if the matter has been ventilated in court many times? Do any of you know what you are doing? Best regards,
G. Stephen Holmes B.Sc. Manxman; student of Manx law. Description Date Time
Deputy Deemster AK Williamson - Family Division 05/11/2004 Location Speaker
13:51:36
TESTINGS
14:11:52 14:21:21 14:37:27 14:37:43 14:41:47 14:42:09
FD/UK/COR/04/02 DDW DDW K O'Riordan Mrs Holmes DDW
Douglas Court 5
Note Holmes v Holmes - In Person & K O’Riordan Adjourns for a few minutes Recommences Addresses DDW Addresses DDW Gives declarity orders
The case file FD/UK/COR/04/02 was created in response to “proceedings under the CCA 1987” but no such proceedings actually happened because the process was unlawful – nothing was in fact “registered” in the Isle of Man High Court although eight documents were produced stating that socalled orders were registered. If that is not “misgovernment” then I don’t know what is.
Photograph taken on iPhone camera – 01/04/2014 at about 10:16 with Jack W as a witness to the fact that no photographs were take of the contents of the file. There is no Act of Tynwald on the front. The green “post-it” was on the page opposite: Amended Mrs Holmes as changed address. The so-called “custody order” was in fact headed “Order Contact Order” and purportedly made under section 8 of the Children Act 1989, an Act of Parliament that does not extend to the Isle of Man. No “orders” were in fact “registered” in the ISLE OF MAN HIGH COURT under any part of the Child Custody Act 1987.