Part 2 Sample Portfolio + CV by Henry Baker

Part II CV + Concise sample Works

Henry Baker

Manchester School of Architecture [CPU_AI Atelier]

Contents Pages

Content

1 2

4-5 6-7

Information + Contact Professional CV

3 4 5 6 7

8 _ _ _ 17

Thesis Project

8 9 10

18 _ 23

Design Project 1

11 12 13

24 _ 29

Design Project 2

14 15 16

30 _ 35

Work from Practice

Spreads

Currently living in

Manchester

Name: Henry Baker Age: 25 Qualifications: MArch Architecture (ARB/RIBA II)

Distinction [80]

MEng Structural Engineering and Architecture (ARB/RIBA I) (Architecture): First Looking for opportunities in

London

Email:

Mobile:

[Click me]

LinkedIn: (www.linkedin.com/in/henry-g-baker)

Project Videos: (www.vimeo.com/user134159018)

Full Portfolios:

(www.issuu.com/henrygbaker)

Skills + competencies Me

Arch.

Architecture

“Hello, I am an RIBA Part II graduate from the Manchester School of Architecture, having recently achieved a Distinction at an average of 80/100.

Programming

Eng.

Engineering

Grasshopper

Oasys GSA

Revit

Python

MS PowerBI

Rhino 3D

Dynamo

QGIS

Sketchup

MS Office

AutoCAD

Professional CV

Comp.

Enscape

Presenting

Adobe Suite

Leading

Key Achievements

I also hold a masters in Structural Engineering (and Architecture) from the University of Sheffield at 2:1 level, giving me a uniquely inter-disciplinary background in design.

“Intelligent Architecture (iA)” magazine segment: Led a multi-national team of 7 to win a feature in the + research magazine “iA”. A thought-piece that proposed a business driven by + ‘internal assets’ such as pre-designed, parametric building templates, internal retrofit panel systems and a computational design toolkit.

I am passionate for inter-disciplinary practice and have gained experience in the three areas of Architecture, Structural Engineering, and Computation. I am hugely interested in automation/Ai and standardising building components with DfMA/MMC.”

Student Ambassador for WaterAid: + Travelled to Ethiopia in 2017 in a team of 10 to set-up clean water wells in the Tigray region, and constructed shelter extensions onto nearby schools. + Taught basic Maths and English in these schools which was an incredibly fulfilling experience.

References:

GEC Global Engineering Challenge: Led a team of 14 in the annual GEC in Sheffield 2018. + + Proposed a modular aquaponics centre and vertical farm to win “best overall idea” and “best communicated idea”.

Rob Hyde: r.hyde@mmu.ac.uk Solon Solomou: s.solomou@mmu.ac.uk Peter Knightley: peter.knightley@tw-2.co.uk

Jun 2021 Sept 2019

MArch Master of Architecture (Pt II) Manchester School of Architecture

Passed with Distinction: 80/100 Overall Won a feature in Scott Brownrigg’s “Intelligent Architecture”

Aug 2019 Dec 2018

Part 1 Architectural Assistant TW-2 Architects, High Wycombe

Worked on a large 3-tower development near the Tate Modern in London, but also worked on a number of smaller residential projects in the Berkhamsted area: + Using Revit to an extremely high level; construction phasing, producing development design documents, brief experience with Navisworks. Contributed heavily towards the facade development of + the scheme, rationalising curvature types into panels for increased buildability. I was responsible for the Architect’s side of the marketing + proposals, producing plan drawings to illustrate the distribution of spaces and accompanying area schedules.

Dec 2018 Aug 2018

Part 1 Architectural Assistant RG+P Architects, Fitzrovia (London)

Worked on a complex, adaptive re-use project in Nottingham, seeking to redevelop an unused manufacturing facility into a high-end residential scheme: + Removing cores from the building and converting a central void space into an internal 6-storey courtyard. I contributed to the co-ordination and layout of the + new flats, specifying existing sections of the building for removal, and visualising the new spaces. + The practice provided a 2 week training course in Revit for this project.

Jun 2018 Sept 2014

MEng Structural Engineering and Architecture (ARB/RIBA Part I) University of Sheffield

Passed with 2:1 Overall Engineering: 2:1 Architecture: First

Aug 2017 Jun 2017

Architecture Intern LBF Architects, Poplar (London)

Completed a short 2 month placement with LBF in London, where I worked on a private housing scheme (RIBA Stages 2 and 3). This placement provided training in Vectorworks and AutoCAD.

Jun 2014 Sept 2012

Sixth Form (A-Levels) Bradfield College, Reading

A2 Level: D&T: A, Physics: B, Mathmatics: B, Fine Art: B AS Level: EPQ: A*

Experience + Education

A C E

Thesis Project Vectr: A Generative design + Simulation Tool

Manchester Centre

Brief: For the Thesis Studio Project, 2020, CPU

students were tasked with building a computational design tool at urban scale. The tool would then be applied to the Northern Gateway site in Manchester to propose an optimised spatial solution.

Client: Manchester City Council (MCC) +

Far East Consortium (FEC)

Agent Plotted Space-Time Path Vertical Projection (Length = time of day)

vectr 9

Infection Intersection Events (Points)

Spatial Model Mode (Simple Geometry)

Vectr: Generate

Step 1: Generate Designs For my master’s thesis project, I built a generative design tool, with the added functionality of simulating the urban design for the spread of an infectious disease. Built using grasshopper, with over 2000 lines-worth of custom nodes scripted in python, the tool was then used to generate a series of design options for the Northern Gateway site in Manchester.

Presentation Model Mode (Detailed Geometry)

The design options were made up of different spatial configurations, incorporating compactness, porosity, rigidity (of the road network) and function (mixed use and single use), to then test how these parameters effect the city’s performance in an epidemic. I then ran the simulation tool on the models to propose an “optimised” urban design to FEC and MCC. Simulation Model Mode (Rationalised for Agent-based modelling)

The Vectr Interface: A detailed design generated using different parameters.

The Vectr Interface: Showing a generated (Spatial) model.

Agent Movement (Physics based)

[place] person

Force

y [home] person’s projected 3D “time-curve”

Vectr: Simulate

Journey Plotted in Space-Time (z axis) [place]

Step 2: Simulate for an Epidemic

person’s route

I built a simulation engine from scratch using “mover forces” in python, to physically translate over 7000 points around the model (agents, people). Agents are generated at each residential unit per density value of each building typology, and are allocated a class from 10 (Teacher, Office-worker...), which dictates where the agent travels to. The generative design element of Vectr generates plot types (Office, Shops...) and therefore “place” points. When the simulation engine is launched, the agents are moved to their (randomly found) destination along the path curves in the model, via the shortest route possible.

z (time) y [home]

Susceptible person

Intersection events solved statically Intersection Point Infected person

The agent’s journey is then plotted in 3D with time, creating “time-curves” which are then used to identify where and how the disease spreads.

2D Infection location

[home]

[place]

The model after the agent’s time-curves are plotted, showing the infection spread after 50 days.

Simulation Launched

Walkability Analysis:

Vectr: Analyse

Average Walking Distance: Lowest Route Distance: Highest Route Distance: Walkability Index:

317m 9.6608m 1000.4728m 0.3119

Devation Index:

0.4766

Infection Hotspots:

Step 3: Compare Designs and Optimise Vectr is able to produce a series of visual outputs, ranging from walkability, infection heatmaps, hotspots and locations, and a “vectr map” which illustrates how the disease moves through the urban model, by showing the directions it transmits from one agent to another. The tool is based on data, and produces real data that can be exported to MS Excel to be presented as a graph, like those seen in the media.

Infection Coverage: 1.3753x106 m2 Infection Coverage Index: 0.1339 Avg. area per infection: 76.3705m2

Infection Locations:

To see the tool work in full, please watch the video on vimeo:

Vectr Promo Video (https://vimeo.com/552144807)

Tenable Units: 28720 Walkability Index: 317m Greenspace (pp): 5.6724m2 Total % Infected: 98.6442 Avg. R-Value: 1.8365 Infection Coverage: 1.3753x106 m2

The tool’s Analysis Interface: 10 design options were generated and tested for the project using Vectr.

The tool’s Analysis Interface: Allowing the user to compare different design options for infectivity.

Vectr Computational Video (https://vimeo.com/552145350) Simple Model Layer A

Detailed Model Layer B

1 = Document Set-Up 2 = Street Network Generation 3 = Creating Blocks & Plots 4 = Locating Transport Hub 5 = Allocating Land Use 6 = Creating Building Typologies 7 = Generating Access Points 8 = Simulation Stage

Grasshopper Script

A C E

Adaptive Re-use Project Righton Robotics Centre

Centre

Brief: To propose an adaptive reuse of an existing

listed building, combining new and old historic architecture, delivering high-quality makerspace for the new University course in construction fabrication. The site is the Righton Building in the Manchester Metropolitan campus.

Client: Manchester Metropolitan University Estates.

Facade and Tectonics

Facade Design: Using Attractor points in Grasshopper to dictate perforation openings

The scheme proposes a makerspace aimed at a new university course on the advancement of technological and computational processes, in the development of construction materials and methods.

Additional

Using Revit and Grasshopper

The adaptive re-use strategy focused on the analysis and emphasis of voids within the existing building and the creation of a public route through the building, both helping to maximise the building’s connection to its surroundings. The under-used courtyard to the rear becomes an adaptive void which intervenes with the existing building creating a large enclosed space at the heart of the building.

Existing

The facilities provide space for students to work alongside or collaboratively with local architecture practices and researchers, providing a continuous opportunity for networking.

Tectonic Form: The junction between heritage and contemporary

Facade Functionality: Winter

Facade Functionality: Summer

Environmental Analysis: Created with Autodesk Insight and Green Building Studio

Perspective Section: Showing the intersected atrium, and main Robotics Spaces

A C E

Modular Housing Project Affordable and Social Housing

Centre

Brief: To propose a high quality housing scheme

through the application of DfMA (Design for Manufacture and Assembly), demonstrating a high level of construction efficiency through the use of prefabricated, standardised elements, while exceeding the national quality and space standards.

Standardised Design Strategy Using panel components The scheme caters for residents with a wide range of incomes by providing a mixture of housing types, sizes and tenures. Interlacing social and private tenures throughout the development to prevent social and economic segregation. The design utilises a ‘Design for Manufacture and Assembly’ strategy that could be used to efficiently design and construct the development. Using panellised pre-fabrication construction techniques will help to minimise waste, ensure quality and reduce construction time. DfMA techniques also help to reduce construction costs and therefore improve the feasibility of providing quality social housing.

Assembly of Wall, floor, facade panels and bathroom + utility pods

Facade and pre-fabricated panel Technical Design

Structural Strategy: Steel frame construction on-site, followed by assembly “slot-in” flat modules

en tia l A

C E

Work from Practice

fid

At TW-2 Architects, High Wycombe

Tate Modern

Site

Project: “Park Street, London” (Full name is confidential).

Client: Sons & Co. and JTRE. All work shown in this section was either produced solely by myself or heavily contributed towards.

en tia l

   



                          

fid

Section BB: Showing Spatial Co-ordination of Tower 3, with the Tate Modern at the side.

      



 

   

4

11th

B-T04

11th 11th B-T04 B-T08 B-T08 B-T08 11thB-T08B-T04 B-T08 11th B-T04 B-T08 B-T06

B-T08

12th

B-T08 B-T08 B-T08

B-T07

B-T04 07

B-T08B-T08 B-T08

B-T07

FACADE NOTES

B-T08

Stage 4: Facade B-T08

Façade panel analysis ongoing with EO'C and Client - subject to review 2. Balconies rationalisation ongoing with EO'C and Client - subject to review 3. Facade profile, materiality and doors ongoing with EO'C and Client - subject to review The majority of mytotime at TW-2 Architects 4. RWP be located within facade panels -was spent locations TBC on the practice’s flagship, large scale mixed-use “Park 5. Purge panel location TBC with MTT and Street” project in London. The scheme consists of 2 EO'C 6. Ventilation strategy TBC with MTT residential towers and 1 office building, connected at 7. Louvres location TBC with MTT 8. Concave elements TBC in the ground floor with curve a reception/communal area and conjunction by EO'C 9. Glass balustrade to be 1300mm high4offretail units. FFL. 10. Thermal, structural and acoustic I contributedperformance heavily towards developing the facade of panles TBC by EO'C 11. Glazing profiles to Ground Floor TBC design, standardising it into panel types specified by 12. Roof profile / depths - subject to review roof fortunate tender package to be provided the supplier. full I was enough to attend many separately

B-T05

B-T05B-T07

12th

client meetings and monitor the project on-site.

B-T07

B-T05

B-T04

B-T01

FLAT 04

CT 07I

B-T02

CT 07E

Roof Level 54300

CT 02A

14 49800

B-T0

B-T02

B-T07

FLAT 03

B-T01

B-T02

B-T07

B-T0

B-T01

B-T05

FLAT 02

B-T05

B-T02

E 05

B-T02

CT 06K

FLAT 01

FLAT 02

13 46600 12 43400 11 40200 10 37000

FLAT 04

FLAT 03

09 33800

CT 08G

CT 02A

08 30600 07 27400

06 24200

05 21000 04 17800

Back Painted Glass Panel

Back Painted Glass Panel (Plant)

B-T05

B-T01

FLAT 01

B-T07

Facade Key

Clear Glazed Panels

B-T05

CT 05K

B-T05

fid

Curvature Panelisation

03 14600

Solid Panel

CT 09A

CT 07O

FLAT 01

FLAT 02

02 11400 01 8200

Purge Panel Louvre Panel

B-T0

South Elevation - Facade Treatme

CT 07E

CT 01B

B-T08

B-T02

B-T07

CT 05I

B-T08

B-T08 08 B-T05

B-T08 scaled dimensions. All errors and emissions to be reported to Architect.

B-T08 B-T08

B-T02

CT 08

B-T08

B-T02

CT 08I

B-T07

B-T05

B-T07

B-T08

12th B-T04B-T05 12th B-T04 B-T08 B-T08 B-T08 B-T08 B-T08 B-T07 06 12th B-T04 All dimensions to be checked on site. B-T08 12th B-T08 Written dimensions to be followed in preference to B-T04 B-T08

CT 08

B-T07

CT 08I

B-T07B-T08

B-T08

B-T07

CT 04I

6th B-T08

B-T0

B-T02

CT 06I

B-T08

B-T02 B-T08

B-T08

CT 04H

B-T08

B-T07

B-T08

CT 07M

B-T08

B-T08 B-T08 B-T08

B-T04

B-T06 B-T04

Ground floor profile TBC

CT 04G

B-T08

B-T08B-T07

h8 h 6th 7

B-T08 B-T08

B-T07

B-T07 B-T08

B-T07 B-T07

B-T08

B-T07

B-T08 B-T08 B-T08

en tia l

h8 h 5th 7

11th

B-T07B-T08

FLAT 04 Glass / louvre provision / external levels TBC FLAT 03

CT 08G

CT 09C

CT 08C

Glass

ure Type 08D m

1800

900 S

B-T04

900

B2 Level 1 Flat 05(8D) B2 Level 2 Flat 05(8D) B2 Level 3 Flat 05(8D) B2 Level 4 Flat 05(8D) B2 Level 5 Flat 05(8D)

S 120

850

300

5400

858

ure Type 08D m

850

Curvature Type 04 9000mm

1765mm

All dimensions to be checked on site. Written dimensions to be followed in pre scaled dimensions. All errors and emissions to be reported

9000

300

2750

Double Door Right Hand 900mm Outward

900

Single Door Right Hand 900mm Inward

1765

450

300

Single Door Right Hand 900mm Outward

Single Door Left Hand 900mm Inward

4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9.

10.

300

Left Hand

850

5400 900mm

Outward

ure Type 08C m

Right Left Hand Hand 900mm 900mm Outward Outward

G Hand Right Hand Right Right Hand B2 Level 3 Flat 900mm 900mm 900mm Outward OutwardB2 Level Outward 4 Flat

Right Hand 04(8C) 900mm 04(8C) Inward B2 Level 5 Flat 04(8C) B2 Level 6 Flat 04(8C) B2 B2 Level Level 7 1 Flat Flat 04(8C) 04(8C) B2 B2 Level Level 8 2 Flat Flat 04(8C) 04(8C) B2 Level 9 3 Flat 04(8C) B2 Level 10 Flat 03(8C) 4 Flat 04(8C) B2 Level 5 Flat 04(8C) B2 Level 6 Flat 04(8C) B2 Level 7 Flat 04(8C) B2 Level 8 Flat 04(8C) B2 Level 9 Flat 04(8C) B2 Level 10 Flat 03(8C)

8100

Curvature Type 08C 900mm module

5400

450

900

Curvature Type 08C 900mm module

2500

28 28

14 14

900

14 14

900

Left Hand 900mm Inward

900

850

Curvature Type 06 7200mm

900

Curvature Type 09C 900mm module

1800

Curvature Type 08 900 5400mm G

900

900 900

SG 900

900 900

900 1800

1800

850

900

G S

900

1800

900

11700

G 1665mm

11700

450

B-T07

Curvature Type 07 5400 6300mm

TYPE 08

450

2250

Curvature Type 08 900mm module

900

6300

Curvature Type 08 900mm module

TYPE 08 TYPE 01 900

900

1665

900

Curvature Type Curvature 01A 900mm Typemodule 01A 900mm module 5400

ure Type 08 m

Line of Facade

900

B2 Level B2 12 Level Flat 02(01B) 12 Flat 02(01B) B2 Level 1 Flat 02(8) B2 Level 2 Flat 02(8) B2 Level 3 Flat 02(8) B2 Level 4 Flat 02(8) B2 Level 5 Flat 02(8) B2 Level 5 Flat 03(8) B2 B2 Level Level 6 1 Flat Flat 02(8) 02(8) B2 B2 Level Level 6 2 Flat Flat 03(8) 02(8) B2 Level 7 B2 Level 3 Flat Flat 02(8) 02(8) B2 Level 7 Flat B2 Level 4 Flat 03(8) 02(8) B2 Level B22065mm Level 8 5450Flat Flat 02(8) 02(8) B2 B2 Level Level 8 5 Flat Flat 03(8) 03(8) B2 Level 9 Flat 02(8) B2 Level 6 Flat 02(8) B2 Level Level 6 9 Flat Flat 03(8) 03(8) B2 B2 Level 10 Flat 02(8) Line of Facade B2 Level 7 Flat 02(8) B2 Level 11 Flat 02(8) B2 Level 7 Flat 03(8) B2 Level 8 Flat 02(8) B2 Level 8 Flat 03(8) B2 Level 9 Flat 02(8) B2 Level 9 Flat 03(8) B2 Level 10 Flat 02(8) B2 Level 11 Flat 02(8)

on B-T01

Curvature Type 01 11700mm S 850

900

850

11700

1250

900

ure Type 08 m

900 900

850 1800

900

01B

B2 Level 10 Flat 01(9A)

1500

900

B-T09

Curvature Type 02A 10800mm 450

900

900 S

Curvature Curvature Type Curvature Type 02A 05Type 02A

B-T05 10800mm 8100mm 10800mm

900

Type 04 Curvature Type 09 900 G B-T04 Curvature 2065mm 9000mm 4500mm 900

900

850

P01 19.03.19 Stage 3 Façade Developme Rev. Date Description 450

450

1100

TYPE 09

1865mm

900 G 900

900 900

G S

900 900

TYPE 09 S G

STAGE 3

2750

10800

 

900

22 Welbeck St London W1G 8 Tel: 0203 637 email: sons@s

Curvature Type 02A 900mm module

900 900

900

1800 G

1800

 

900 900 900 900 Project Title G S G S 850 Park Street S

850 185

London, SE1

TYPE 02 Drawing Title

8100

10800

Block 02 - Facade Analysis Types

10800

450 1865

Curvature Type Curvature 02A 900mm Typemodule 02A 900mm module 900

Door locations are indicative

2500

10800

900

9000

4500

900

1665mm

1800

450

Curvature Type 02 10800mm

1765mm













B-T08

Date

Scale

Cad Ref

Draw

MAR 19

1:50

18 536

Drawing No.

Facade curvature being standardised into set curve types, then further rationalised with pre-fabricated panel components. B-T02

900

2065

G G

850 G

Curvature Type 09A 900mm module

1965

900 900

4500

450 450 B2 Level 10 Flat 01(9A)

900

4500

450

2065

G S

5400

Curvature Type 09A 900mm module

1665

900 900

G G

850 G

1800

900

Curvature Type 09A 900 B2 Level 12 Flat 02(01B)4500mm

450 Curvature Type 01A 900mm module

900 900

900 S 2165mm

7200

11700

900

B2 Level 10 Flat 03(9C)

Curvature Type 09C 900mm module

Curvature Type 09A 450 4500mm

1965mm

4500

fid

B-T06

re Type 01B mm

B2 Level 10 Flat 03(9C)

850 G

4500

450

2500

1800

900

Left Hand 900mm Inward

1765

900

Curvature Type 09C 4500mm

900 G

900 450

900 S

900

B-T08

900

Curvature Type 09C Single Door4500mm Single Door 14 14

900

Single Door Right Hand 900mm Inward

300 60

2828

300

1765

850 G

900

300

900 900

60 300

14 14

970

Corner Bay Corner Bay Curved glass Curved glass 970mm 970mm

14 14

900 Curvature Type 450 S 05 900 B2 Level 1 Flat 04(8C) 1865mm G S 8100mm Single Door Single Door Single SingleDoor Door Single DoorDouble Door Double Door B2 Level 2 Flat 04(8C)

B-T05 970

900mm

1800

900

60 300

970

120

300

900

900mm

900

14 14

11. 12.

900

2165

900

1865

ure Type 08C m Standard BayStandard Bay

300

120

300 60

300

14 14

850

900

970

900

858

900

300 60

858

450

300

1800

300

120

300

60 300

120

Façade panel analysis ongoin and Client - subject to review Balconies rationalisation ongo EO'C and Client - subject to re Facade profile, materiality and ongoing with EO'C and Client review RWP to be located within faca locations TBC Purge panel location TBC with EO'C Ventilation strategy TBC with M Louvres location TBC with MT Concave curve elements TBC conjunction by EO'C Glass balustrade to be 1300m FFL. Thermal, structural and acous performance of panles TBC by Glazing profiles to Ground Flo Roof profile / depths - subject full roof tender package to be separately

en tia l

Single Door Left Hand 900mm Outward

Curvature Type 08D 900mm module

Line of Facade

5400

900

300

120

Corner Bay Curved glass 970mm

1765 300

1665

Standard Bay 900mm

28 970

900

300

450

Curvature Type 08D 900mm module 970

FACADE NOTES

B2 Level 1 450 Flat 05(8D) B2 Level 2 Flat 05(8D) B2 Level 3 Flat 05(8D) B2 Level 4 Flat 05(8D) 900 B2 Level 5 Flat 05(8D)

900

185P-TW2-B02-XX-DR-A-61



 Curvature Type 08 5400mm

2165mm

41725 SSL

03 500

Roof depth under review

4075

en tia l

Facade conne bullnose detai

Core Lobby

Office

37800 FFL

210

Facade conne bullnose detai

390

210

2520 390 2520 390 2520 2520

2700

390 2520 390

290

8200 FFL

Core Lobby

150

Office

2700

3700

210

290

Core Lobby

150

11900 FFL

390

210

290

3700

Office

700

2550 SSL

3200 FFL

3100 TOP TT

Roof depth under r

390

External levels TBC

3000 SSL

3820

Core Lobby

Service Area

5500

I worked on all 3 towers, mostly delivering the design in Autodesk Revit, which made my highly proficient in BIM.

Core Lobby

Irrigation Room TBC

2940

4000

Cycle Store Retail

400

-1250 FFL

4450

The building’s facade was inspired by the Aqua Tower in Chicago, and features an undulating floor slab composition, giving the wave-like effect. The facade curves were bespoke on every floor, as a practice we standardised these curves and solved junction clashes to the highest level of detail, so that on-site assembly of pre-fabricated panels was achievable.

15600 FFL

Core Lobby

150

Office

fid

My experience at TW-2 involved a high level of technical work in Stage 4, looking at how we can simplify the buildings curvature and organise into a set of 9 curve templates, that can then be optimised for panelisation. This was financially-driven by the client, and an area of interest for the practice, with the ambition to specialise in design for off-site construction. This in turn, aligned with my interest significantly and influenced my career going forward.

2700

3700

210

19300 FFL

290

Facade Design Delivery

Core Lobby

150

Office

2700

3700

210

290

150

23000 FFL

Core Lobby

2700

3700

Stage 4: Facade

Office

390

210

290

150

26700 FFL

Core Lobby

2623

3700

Office

390 2580

Core Lobby

2450

150

3700

30400 FFL

Office

2520

Office

210

34100 FFL

Core Lobby

2600

150

3700

PJCE to review beam sizes

Core Lobby

Boiler Room

Office / Retail Cycle Store

PJCE to confirm slab profile

1 : 100

03 Detailed Section of Tower 1 showing clashes with M&E. 500

E 532179351

N 180356441 E 532181111 N 180356018 E 532182856

N 180357407 E 532176730

N 180355562 E 532184602

N 180357027 E 532178494

180

N 180355106 E 532186345 N 180354653 E 532188083

PJCE to review connection detail 120

N 180354201 Profile and fixing detail E 532189813 TBC with EO'C

6+0.2+5

6651

N 180355789 E 532183732

N 180355334 E 532185474

Uv 0.20

N 180354427 E 532188949

N 180352712 E 532194967

N 180351926 E 532196453

N 180353503 E 532192425

2468

N 180353007 E 532194141

3952

N 180352418 E 532195792

N 180351276 E 532196968

1300

N 180349682 E 532197388

110

180

PJCE to review connection detail

150

104

2867

3300

104

N 180340114 0.20 E 532195340

PJCE to review connection detail

2700

Office 07

N 180338318 E 532194873

N 180337513 E 532194665

150

N 180334628 E 532187797

Note: Perimeter linear drainage channel

required to door thresholds N 180336636 E 532194438

N 180334701 E 532193032

N 180334545 E 532189603

104

C Uv 0.20

N 180334832 E 532180736

N 180334685 E 532186899

Technical section of facade junctions on Tower 1.

N 180335169 E 532193690

N 180334586 E 532188724

N 180334504 E 532190490

N 180334484 E 532192243

Uv 0.20

Q 0

0.5

Construction plan drawings for panel assembly (Tower 1).

140

120

N 180335831 E 532194165

N 180334479 E 532191382

N 180334854 E 532176486

80334821 32175342

550

N 180339244 E 532195113

N 180334828 E 532181091

Note: Perimeter linear drainage channel required to door thresholds

120

N 180341856 E 532195792 140

N 180340980 E 532195564

Profile and fixing detail TBC with EO'C

150

180

1251

N 180343595 E 532196244

4466

1300

N 180342724 E 532196018

2606

2700

N 180334847 E 532179385

N 180345337 E 532196696

180

on 1300

Office 08

fid

10 140

104

942

N 180334852 E 532176080

N 180344464 E 532196470

PJCE to review connection detail

2750

N 180346206 E 532196922

120

Uv 0.20

2867

NOTE: Uv TBC By MTT, Waterproofing and Insulation Details TBC By Bauder, Facade Details TBC by EOC.

2700

3300 180

1300 150 550

PJCE 942 to review connection detail

550

0334779 2174321

Uv 0.20

N 180347065 E 532197145

2700

Uv 0.20

120

N 180347935 E 532197282

10 104

120

Profile and fixing detail TBC with EO'C

N 180348812 E 532197374

Profile and fixing detail TBC with EO'C

550

140 180

150 550

8200 FFL

2750

N 180350520 E 532197295

4533

8050 SSL

CORE

Plant 09

2700

Office 09

Profile and fixing detail TBC with EO'C

0.5

N 180353261 E 532193288

N 180354879 E 532187216

N 180353968 E 532190704

3952

633

4746

120

N 180353745 E 532191559

en tia l

500

150

N 180356229 E 532181983

Detail TBC wioth EO'C

Var Min 100mm

N 180356634 E 532180249

1300

N 180357626 E 532174973

0.2+40+0.2

57661 73207

Thank you. Please visit my Issuu page to see my full portfolios.