El Observador June 3rd, 2022.

VOLUME 43 ISSUE 22 | WWW.EL-OBSERVADOR.COM | JUN 03 - JUN 09, 2022

COVER: PACO ROJAS RESOURCES: HARD-OPS / CGTRADER

2

OPINION

EL OBSERVADOR | www.el-observador.com

“DO SOMETHING!” BIDEN VOWS TO TAKE ACTION AFTER VISIT TO UVALDE

"¡HAGA ALGO!" BIDEN SE COMPROMETE A TOMAR ACCIONES TRAS VISITA A UVALDE ESPAÑOL

1042 West Hedding St. Suite 250 San Jose, CA 95126

PUBLISHER Angelica Rossi angelica@el-observador. com PUBLISHER EMERITUS Hilbert Morales hmorales@el-observador. com ADVERTISING & SALES DIRECTOR Angelica Rossi angelica@el-observador. com ADVERTISING SALES JOB & RECRUITMENT ADVERTISING Justin Rossi justin@el-observador.com MANAGING EDITOR Arturo Hilario arturo@el-observador.com spanish.editor@el-observador. com CONTRIBUTORS Justin Rossi Mario Jimenez Hector Curriel OP-ED Arturo Hilario Arturo@el-observador ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLES AND LEGAL NOTICES Angelica Rossi frontdesk@el-observador. com GRAPHIC DESIGNER Francisco Rojas fcorojas@el-observador. com ABOUT US El Observador was founded in 1980 to serve the informational needs of the Hispanic community in the San Francisco Bay Area with special focus on San Jose, the capital of Silicon Valley. All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be transmitted or reproduced by any form or by any means, this includes photo copying, recording or by any informational storage and retrevial systems, electronic or mechanical without express written consent of the publishers. Opinions expressed in El Observador by persons submitting articles are not necessarily the opinions of the publishers.

ADVERTISING LEGAL NOTICES SUBSCRIPTIONS INQUIRIES

408-938-1700 WWW.EL-OBSERVADOR.COM

ENGLISH

José López Zamorano La Red Hispana

“We will do it,” replied the president, who has personally suffered the irreparable loss of a son. It was his second visit to a massacre in less than a month, after he comforted relatives of the victims of the Buffalo shooting by a white supremacist.

E

l grito salió desde el corazón de uno de los residentes de Uvalde, Texas, cuando el presidente Biden y su esposa Jill depositaban una ofrenda floral en el improvisado monumento en memoria de las pequeñas víctimas de la Escuela Primaria Robb, en la más reciente masacre escolar que conmueve al país y al mundo.

“Presidente Biden necesitamos ayuda… Haga algo”, le imploró la voz. “Lo haremos”, respondió el presidente, quien ha sufrido en carne propia la pérdida irreparable de un hijo. Era su segunda visita a una masacre en menos de un mes, después de que consoló a familiares de las víctimas del tiroteo cometido en Buffalo, por un supremacista blanco.

En los rostros de quienes visitaron el monumento a los niños de Uvalde, se apreciaban los rasgos inconfundibles de la indignación y la impotencia.

Ben Gonzales fue uno de los residentes que le gritó a Biden. “Hay que hacer algo, necesitamos un cambio, necesitamos ayuda y mi mayor temor es que nada vaya a cambiar, y dentro de seis meses Uvalde solo será Uvalde, solo será historia y nada habrá cambiado”, explicó poco después a la cadena CNN. También le había gritado al gobernador de Texas, el republicano Gregg Abbott, un estado donde es más difícil comprar una cerveza que un rifle de asalto.

Los temores de Ben son fundados.

Desde la masacre de Columbine en 1999 nada significativo ha ocurrido en el Congreso para contener la hemorragia de muertos por armas de fuego. Ni las masacres de Sandy Hook, Parkland o El Paso lograron mover la aguja un centímetro.

Como les preguntó el senador Chris Murphy a sus colegas en el piso del Senado. “¿Por qué quieren llegar al Senado de los Estados Unidos? ¿Por qué se molestan en conseguir este trabajo, en colocarse en una posición de autoridad?” Ninguno de los senadores opuestos a regulaciones sensibles para las armas, sean republicanos o demócratas, puede verse al espejo sin una cara de vergüenza.

Biden prometió a quienes le gritaron en Uvalde, Texas, que haría algo. Pero la realidad es que las décadas de estancamiento legislativo en el tema del control de armas ilustra también los límites del poder presidencial y la fortaleza de la disfuncionalidad de nuestra clase política en Washington.

La prohibición de las armas de asalto expiró en 2004 y no existe ninguna expectativa razonable de un consenso bipartidista para renovarla. La buena noticia es que varios estados, condados y ciudades están apresurándose a aprobar sus propias medidas, como elevar la edad de

JUN 03 - JUN 09, 2022

In the faces of those who visited the monument to the children of Uvalde, the unmistakable features of indignation and impotence could be seen.

(CC BY 2.0) US Department of Defense / Lisa Ferdinando

compra de armas de 18 a 21 años, demandar civilmente a fabricantes de armas y mucho más.

A su regreso a Washington, el presidente apeló a los republicanos “racionales” a sumar esfuerzos y aprobar regulaciones sensibles. Los padres de los todos los menores que han sido víctimas de la violencia irracional, y todos nosotros, esperamos que la racionalidad se asiente en el Congreso y que nuestros políticos se eleven a la altura de las circunstancias, o los votantes se los recordarán en las elecciones de noviembre.

José López Zamorano La Red Hispana

T

he cry came from the heart of one of the residents of Uvalde, Texas, as President Biden and his wife Jill laid a wreath at the makeshift memorial to the child victims of Robb Elementary School in the latest school massacre in the most recent school massacre that has shocked the country and the world.

“President Biden, we need help… Do something,” the voice implored him.

Ben Gonzales was one of the residents who yelled at Biden. "Something has to be done, we need a change, we need help and my greatest fear is that nothing is going to change, and in six months Uvalde will only be Uvalde, it will only be history and nothing will have changed," he explained shortly after to CNN. He had also yelled at the governor of Texas, Republican Gregg Abbott, the leader of a state where it's harder to buy a beer than an assault rifle.

Ben's fears are well founded. Since the Columbine massacre in 1999, nothing significant has happened in Congress to stem the hemorrhage of gun deaths. Not even the Sandy Hook, Parkland, or El Paso massacres managed to move the needle an inch.

As Senator Chris Murphy asked his colleagues on the Senate floor, “Why do they want to get to the United States Senate? Why do they bother to get this job, to put themselves in a position of authority?

None of the senators opposed to sensitive gun regulations, Republican or Democrat, can look in the mirror without a shamed face.

Biden promised those who yelled at him in Uvalde, Texas, that he would do something. But the reality is that decades of legislative gridlock on gun control also illustrates the limits of presidential power and the strength of the dysfunction of our political class in Washington.

The assault weapons ban expired in 2004, and there is no reasonable expectation of a bipartisan consensus to renew it. The good news is that several states, counties and cities are rushing to pass their own measures, such as raising the age of purchase of guns from 18 to 21, civil lawsuits against gun manufacturers and much more.

Upon his return to Washington, the president appealed to "rational" Republicans to join forces and pass sensible regulations. The parents of all minors who have been victims of irrational violence, and all of us, hope that rationality settles in Congress and that our politicians rise to the occasion, or the voters will remind them in the November elections.

JUN 03 - JUN 09, 2022

MEN'S HEALTH MONTH: IT'S OK, THE DOCTOR WON'T BITE

J

MAIN NEWS

EL OBSERVADOR | www.el-observador.com

3

MES DE LA SALUD MASCULINA: ESTÁ BIEN, EL MÉDICO NO MUERDE

ENGLISH

ESPAÑOL

Mike Moen Public News Service

menores que pueden convertirse en problemas mayores.

Ya sea que se trate de una articulación preocupante, o tal vez tengan un poco de presión o dolor en el pecho, y luego - en última instancia, tengan un ataque al corazón", dijo. “O tal vez tengan un poco de dolor de cabeza o entumecimiento y pasan por alto los primeros signos de un derrame cerebral".

une is Men's Health Month, and some providers still are trying to convince more men to make room for wellness visits on their calendar. A South Dakota physician says shrugging things off eventually could land you in a medical setting more frequently.

Mark Beard, a specialist in family medicine and men's health for Sanford Health, said men typically start to avoid doctor visits after their teenage years, when they no longer have required physicals for things such as team sports. Instead, he said, they should embrace having regular talks with their provider. That way, they'll feel comfortable discussing minor issues that can snowball into bigger problems.

"Whether that's a joint of concern, or maybe they're having a little bit of chest tightness or chest pain - and then ultimately come in with a heart attack," he said, "or, maybe they've got a little bit of headache or numbness and they miss early signs of a stroke."

In a survey last year from Aflac, 45% of men said they didn't visit a family doctor or general practitioner for an annual check-up or wellness visit. Another 84% said they didn't follow up with a provider for a specific injury.

Through social media and television ads, a lot of products focus on boosting testosterone.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reports 13% of adult males in the United States are in fair or poor health. Photo Credit: Adobe Stock

Los Centros para el Control y la Prevención de Enfermedades informan que el 13% de los hombres adultos en los Estados Unidos tienen una salud regular o mala. Photo Credit: Adobe Stock

However, Beard suggested that those supplements shouldn't be the only things that motivate men to improve their health.

Mike Moen Public News Service

J

"Just because you're fatigued, or you don't have the build or the look that you had when you were a teenager or an early adult, doesn't necessarily mean that that's the cause of all of your problems," he said.

unio es el Mes de la Salud Masculina, y algunos proveedores todavía están tratando de convencer a más hombres para que dejen espacio para las visitas de bienestar en su calendario. Un médico de Dakota del Sur dice que ignorar las cosas eventualmente podría llevarle a un entorno médico con más frecuencia.

He said regular visits can help detect issues that might make you feel worn down. Beard added that weight-loss drugs and other supplements are not replacements for establishing a healthy lifestyle plan focused on eating better and getting regular physical activity - plans that can be mapped out in conversations with your doctor.

Mark Beard, especialista en medicina familiar y salud masculina de Sanford Health, dijo que los hombres generalmente comienzan a evitar las visitas al médico después de la adolescencia, cuando ya no necesitan exámenes físicos para cosas como los deportes de equipo. En su lugar, dijo, deberían aceptar tener conversaciones regulares con su proveedor. De esa manera, se sentirán cómodos hablar sobre problemas

En una encuesta realizada el año pasado por Aflac, el 45 % de los hombres dijeron que no visitaron a un médico de familia o a un médico general para un chequeo anual o una visita de bienestar. Un otro 84 % dijo que no hizo un seguimiento con un proveedor por una lesión específica.

A través de las redes sociales y los anuncios de televisión, muchos productos se enfocan en aumentar la testosterona. Sin embargo, Beard sugirió que esos complementos no deberían ser lo único que motive a los hombres a mejorar su salud.

"El hecho de que estés cansado, o no tengas la complexión o el aspecto que tenías cuando eras un adolescente o adulto joven, no significa necesariamente que esa sea la causa de todos tus problemas".

Dijo que las visitas regulares pueden ayudar a detectar problemas que pueden hacer que se sienta agotado. Beard agregó que los medicamentos para bajar de peso y otros suplementos no son un reemplazo de establecer un plan de estilo de vida saludable que se enfoca en comer mejor y realizar actividad física con regularidad planes que se pueden hacer en conversaciones con su médico.

Mantenerte cerca de tus raíces hace que tu salud Glorezca

El Center For Elders’ Independence FTUÃ BRVÎ QBSB ayudarte a florecer con nuestro plan de salud PACE, servicios personalizados que ayudan a las personas mayores a vivir seguros e independientes en casa, porque en casa es donde tu salud florece.

Las personas de 55 años o más, que viven con una Dondición de salud, pueden confiar en nuestros cuidados médicos, dentales y para la vista. Además, servicios adicionales como transporte, gimnasio, actividades en grupo y más. Todo sin deducibles.

Llama al 844-326-1150 o visita Elders.org y descubre si calificas para FM QMBO PACE

4

HEALTH

EL OBSERVADOR | www.el-observador.com

JUN 03 - JUN 09, 2022

SOSPECHA DE UN CONTAGIO DE VIRUELA SECOND MONKEYPOX CASE CONFIRMED HAY DEL SIMIO EN CALIFORNIA: CUALES SON SUS IN CALIFORNIA: WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW SÍNTOMAS Y QUE TAN CONTAGIOSO ES? ENGLISH

ESPAÑOL

Ana B. Ibarra & Kristen Hwang CalMatters

ganglios linfáticos inflamados y, a menudo, sarpullido.

En algunos casos recientes, los síntomas incluyeron lesiones en el área genital, que pueden confundirse con otras infecciones más comunes, como la sífilis o el herpes, según los CDC.

A

second person has contracted monkeypox in California, health officials confirmed Friday, May 27 as a result of close contact with the state’s first case.

California reported its first case of monkeypox Tuesday in Sacramento County.

The first individual recently returned from a trip to Europe where clusters of cases have been recently reported. Officials did not disclose the date the individual returned from their trip nor any demographic information about them. The second individual was identified through contact tracing.

Sacramento County Public Health Officer Dr. Olivia Kasirye said both people are in isolation in their respective homes.

“There is minimal risk to the general public,” Kasirye said.

While the health advisories and Sacramento County Division of Public Health’s press conference Tuesday are reminiscent of the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic, experts say monkeypox is less transmissible than coronavirus and the disease tends to be less severe. It’s not going to be the next COVID, they say.

Health experts say people should be cognizant, but not worried at this point.

Initial test results from the county public health laboratory indicated the individual was infected with a virus in the same family as monkeypox. Specimens were sent to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the state health department Monday. The CDC confirmed the Sacramento patient’s monkeypox diagnosis on Wednesday.

There are nine other known cases in the U.S. Sacramento County health officials are working with the CDC and California Department of Public Health to identify close contacts of the individual with the suspected case and those who may have been on the same flight from Europe. Kasirye did not disclose how many people may be considered close contacts.

The state health department has directed doctors to immediately alert their local health department if they suspect a positive case.

State testing capacity is limited given the rarity of the disease, but officials are working on increasing capabilities and are prepared to receive samples, according to the department directive.

Although cases in the U.S., including California’s, have been mild, Kasirye said it is still important to limit transmission.

“The concern for us in public health is always that there might be some people that end up with severe disease and so we want to make sure that we prevent any additional cases,” she said.

Here’s what you need to know about monkeypox: What are the symptoms?

Symptoms for monkeypox disease usually include fever, muscle aches, swollen lymph nodes and often a rash. In some recent cases symptoms included lesions in the genital area, which may be confused with other more common infections, like syphilis or herpes, according to the CDC. “These rash lesions can appear in parts of the body that can cause serious complications,” said Jennifer McQuiston, deputy director of the CDC’s division of high consequence pathogens and pathology, during a Monday press call.

“So if the rash lesion occurs in the eye, for example, that person may have their vision endangered. If the lymph nodes become so swollen that breathing is compromised, that’s a concern.” But those are rare, McQuiston said.

Health officials are working to confirm California’s first suspected cases of monkeypox. Experts say it is not the next COVID-19. Photo Credit: CDC/Unsplash

The incubation time is anywhere from five to 21 days, and a person is considered infectious when symptoms start until the skin lesions have fully healed.

How is it transmitted?

Monkeypox is transmitted through close physical contact, usually with bodily fluids, such as saliva, or through respiratory droplets during prolonged faceto-face contact.

“It’s not a situation where if you’re passing someone in the grocery store, they’re going to be at risk for monkeypox,” McQuiston said. People most at risk are those with intimate contact with an infected person, as well as family members or health care workers caring for someone with an active infection.

Is there treatment for monkeypox?

There is no specific treatment for monkeypox. Most infections are mild and get better on their own within two to four weeks, according to public health experts.

Because of its similarity to smallpox, smallpox vaccination may also protect people from monkeypox infections. Routine smallpox vaccination stopped after the disease was declared eradicated in the 1980s, so smallpox vaccines aren’t generally available to the public. The CDC has said that in case of a monkeypox outbreak in the U.S., it would release guidance on who should get vaccinated. “We’re working now to develop recommendations to ensure that the vaccine supplies that we have are available to those who need it,” McQuiston said on Monday.

Where did it originate and why is it spreading now?

The first case of monkeypox in humans was first recorded in the 1970s, in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, where most infections are today, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The monkeypox is endemic in West and Central Africa and rare in other parts of the world, which is why the recent outbreaks in countries outside of Africa are causing alarm. At least 12 other countries, mostly in Europe, have confirmed monkeypox infections as of today.

The cluster of infections in European countries have been linked to sexual activity at two large party events in Spain and Belgium.

How likely is it to be the next COVID-19?

“It’s absolutely 100% not going to be the next COVID-19,” said Dr. George Rutherford, an epidemiologist at the University of California, San Francisco. “It’s a-difficult-to-transmit disease and it’s not a particularly severe disease.”

What makes COVID-19 so dangerous is that it can spread easily through the air. This isn’t the case with monkeypox. The coronavirus was also novel; monkeypox isn’t.

In 2003, six U.S. states — not including California — reported 71 monkeypox cases to the CDC. In that instance, most people were exposed to infected prairie dogs. Two children were hospitalized, but recovered.

CalMatters COVID and health care coverage is supported by grants from the Blue Shield of California Foundation, the California Health Care Foundation and the California Wellness Foundation.

Los funcionarios de salud están trabajando para confirmar los primeros casos sospechoso de viruela del simio en California. Los expertos dicen que no es el próximo COVID-19. Photo Credit: Ani Kolleshi / Unsplash

“Estas lesiones cutáneas pueden aparecer en partes del cuerpo que pueden causar complicaciones graves”, dijo Jennifer McQuiston, subdirectora de la división de patógenos y patologías de alta consecuencia de los CDC, durante una conferencia de prensa el lunes.

Ana B. Ibarra & Kristen Hwang CalMatters

“Entonces, si la lesión de erupción ocurre en el ojo, por ejemplo, esa persona puede tener su visión en peligro.

Si los ganglios linfáticos se inflaman tanto que la respiración se ve comprometida, eso es motivo de preocupación”. Pero esos casos son raros, dijo McQuiston.

na segunda persona contrajo viruela del simio en California, confirmaron funcionarios de salud el viernes 27 de mayo, como resultado del contacto cercano con el primer caso del estado.

El tiempo de incubación es de cinco a 21 días, y se considera que una persona es infecciosa cuando comienzan los síntomas hasta que las lesiones de la piel se curan por completo.

U

California reportó su primer caso de viruela del mono el martes en el condado de Sacramento.

El primer individuo regresó recientemente de un viaje a Europa donde recientemente se informaron grupos de casos. Los funcionarios no revelaron la fecha en que el individuo regresó de su viaje ni información demográfica sobre ellos. El segundo individuo fue identificado a través del rastreo de contactos.

La Dra. Olivia Kasirye, oficial de salud pública del condado de Sacramento, dijo que ambas personas están aisladas en sus respectivos hogares.

“Existe un riesgo mínimo para el público en general”, dijo Kasirye.

Si bien los avisos de salud y la conferencia de prensa de hoy de la División de Salud Pública del Condado de Sacramento recuerdan los primeros días de la pandemia de COVID-19, los expertos dicen que la viruela símica es menos transmisible que el coronavirus y que la enfermedad tiende a ser menos grave. No va a ser el próximo COVID, dicen.

Los expertos en salud dicen que las personas deben ser conscientes, pero no preocuparse en este momento.

Los resultados de las pruebas iniciales del laboratorio de salud pública del condado indicaron que la persona estaba infectada con un virus de la misma familia que la viruela del simio. El lunes se enviaron muestras a los Centros para el Control y la Prevención de Enfermedades y al departamento de salud del estado para confirmar el diagnóstico de viruela del simio. Kasirye dijo que no hay una estimación de cuándo los CDC podrán confirmar los resultados, pero según los síntomas y las pruebas preliminares, “es probable que se confirme”.

Los funcionarios de salud del condado de Sacramento están trabajando con los CDC y el Departamento de Salud Pública de California para identificar a las personas que han tenido contacto cercano con la persona con el caso sospechoso y aquellos que pueden haber estado en el mismo vuelo desde Europa. Kasirye no reveló cuántas personas pueden considerarse contactos cercanos.

El departamento de salud del estado ha ordenado a los médicos que alerten de inmediato a su departamento de salud local si sospechan un caso positivo.

La capacidad de prueba del estado es limitada dada la rareza de la enfermedad, pero los funcionarios están trabajando para aumentar las capacidades y están preparados para recibir muestras, según la directiva del departamento.

Aunque los casos en los EE. UU., incluido el de California, han sido leves, Kasirye dijo que aún es importante limitar la transmisión.

“La preocupación para nosotros en salud pública siempre es que pueda haber algunas personas que terminen con una enfermedad grave, por lo que queremos asegurarnos de prevenir casos adicionales”, dijo.

Esto es lo que necesita saber sobre la viruela del simio: ¿Cuáles son los síntomas?

Los síntomas de la enfermedad de la viruela del simio generalmente incluyen fiebre, dolores musculares,

¿Cómo se transmite?

Viruela del mono se transmite a través del contacto físico cercano, generalmente con fluidos corporales, como la saliva, o a través de gotitas respiratorias durante el contacto cara a cara prolongado.

“No es una situación en la que, si te cruzas con alguien en la tienda de comestibles, estará en riesgo de contraer la viruela del mono”, dijo McQuiston. Las personas con mayor riesgo son aquellas que tienen contacto íntimo con una persona infectada, así como los miembros de la familia o los trabajadores de la salud que cuidan a alguien con una infección activa. ¿Existe tratamiento para la viruela del simio?

No existe un tratamiento específico para la viruela del simio. La mayoría de las infecciones son leves y mejoran por sí solas en dos a cuatro semanas, según los expertos en salud pública.

Debido a su similitud con la viruela, la vacunación contra la viruela también puede proteger a las personas de las infecciones de viruela del mono. La vacunación contra la viruela de rutina se detuvo después de que se declaró erradicada la enfermedad en la década de 1980, por lo que las vacunas contra la viruela generalmente no están disponibles para el público. El CDC ha dicho que en caso de un brote de viruela del simio en los EE. UU., publicaría una guía sobre quién debería vacunarse. “Estamos trabajando ahora para desarrollar recomendaciones para garantizar que los suministros de vacunas que tenemos estén disponibles para quienes los necesitan”, dijo McQuiston el lunes. ¿Dónde se originó y por qué se está extendiendo ahora?

El primer caso de viruela del simio en humanos se registró por primera vez en la década de 1970, en la República Democrática del Congo, donde hoy se encuentran la mayoría de las infecciones, según los Centros para el Control y la Prevención de Enfermedades.

La viruela del simio es endémica en África occidental y central y rara en otras partes del mundo, razón por la cual los brotes recientes en países fuera de África están causando alarma. Al menos otros 12 países, principalmente en Europa, han confirmado infecciones de viruela del simio a partir de hoy.

El grupo de infecciones en los países europeos ha sido vinculado a la actividad sexual en dos grandes eventos de fiesta en España y Bélgica. ¿Qué tan probable es que sea el próximo COVID-19?

“Es absolutamente seguro en un 100% que no va a ser el próximo COVID-19”, dijo el Dr. George Rutherford, epidemiólogo de la Universidad de California, San Francisco. “Es una enfermedad difícil de transmitir y no es una condición particularmente grave”.

Lo que hace que el COVID-19 sea tan peligroso es que puede propagarse fácilmente por el aire. Este no es el caso de la viruela del mono. El coronavirus también fue novedoso; la viruela del simio no lo es.

En 2003, seis estados de EE. UU., sin incluir California, informarón acerca de 71 casos de viruela símica a los CDC. En ese caso, la mayoría de las personas estuvieron expuestas a perros de la pradera infectados. Dos niños fueron hospitalizados, pero se recuperaron.

JUN 03 - JUN 09, 2022

FOOD

EL OBSERVADOR | www.el-observador.com

WHAT'S FOR DINNER? 5 TIPS FOR MAXIMIZING LEFTOVERS

5

¿QUÉ HAY PARA CENAR? 5 CONSEJOS PARA MAXIMIZAR LA COMIDA SOBRANTE ESPAÑOL de hacer esa frittata de huevo para su desayuno-almuerzo en casa, considere los hash browns de batata o la pasta con queso para que pueda disfrutarlos en los próximos días.

3. Considere los ingredientes "adicionales" como base para nuevas comidas.

Photo Credit: BPT Photo Credit: Polina Tankilevitch / Pexels

ENGLISH

L

BPT

eftovers are an easy solution to the common question, "What's for dinner?" and are a simple step toward more sustainable living. A recent survey found that 72% of Americans identify as pro-leftovers but how can we cook and store these foods for maximum mealtime "yum" and less food waste?

Whether you're pro-leftovers all the way or need some convincing, follow the tips below for a more sustainable approach to mealtime joy.

1. Keep an organized fridge.

An organized fridge is key to making the most of your leftovers and limiting food waste.

Give your fridge interior a refresh so you can best find food items and develop a system that works for your family.

A recent Bosch survey found that 61% of people believe they would waste less food if their fridge had more useful storage capacity. Utilize flexible storage and shelving solutions to make space for taller items, like large cakes or bottles, so every inch of your fridge interior is maximized.

Label your leftovers with the date they were made, and store them in airtight, glass containers.

It's easy to forget what's in your fridge until it's too late - glass storage containers are not only reusable and sustainable, but also allow you to see what's inside.

days to come.

3. Treat "extras" as a foundation for new meals.

We all have that one recipe that calls for only a small amount of one ingredient, but you don't need it for anything else. Think about what extra ingredients can become to save time and money.

For example, repurpose vegetable scraps to make a soup or stock. Toss extra carrots, onions and the like in a gallon zip-top bag in the freezer. If you prepare twice the vegetables you'll need for a meal, you'll have a starting point for a soup or pasta salad later in the week, such as Leftovers Veggie Soup.

4. Maximize freshness with the right products and appliances.

Choose a refrigerator that features freshness technology specifically designed to extend the shelf life of your food, so you can have peace of mind knowing your leftovers will be good to eat in days after you first eat the meal.

You can also freeze leftovers if you want to extend their life for a longer period of time. An easy storage hack for leftover soup or

sauce is to freeze them in muffin tins or ice cube trays for small portions to easily use for other meals.

5. Reheat your leftovers like a pro.

There are a number of ways to best reheat leftovers, and 41% of survey respondents said reheating ability is a key factor that would incentivize them to eat more leftovers.

Your cooktop is a key method to making your leftovers feel like a brand-new meal. While microwaves are handy when you're on a time crunch, they might give your leftovers an undesirable consistency, whereas cooking on the stovetop on low heat maintains its original taste and texture.

You can also reheat leftovers on an induction cooktop for fast and precise reheating to ensure your leftovers don't have any cold spots, and for easy cleanup.

Steam cooking is another great way to reheat leftovers, as it retains nutrients, moisture and the original integrity of your food. Try reheating foods like fish and veggies in a steam oven - your leftovers will always come out fresh and flavorful!

L

BPT

a comida sobrante es una solución fácil a la pregunta común de "¿Qué hay para cenar?", y un paso simple en el camino hacia una vida más sostenible. Una encuesta reciente revela que el 72% de los estadounidenses favorecen el consumo de comida sobrante. Sin embargo, ¿cómo podemos cocinar y almacenar estos alimentos para obtener el máximo nivel de "Mmmm..." a la hora de comer, y menos desperdicios? Independientemente de que esté totalmente a favor de lo que sobró, o necesite algo de convencimiento, siga los consejos siguientes para un enfoque más sostenible de la alegría en cada comida.

1. Mantenga el refrigerador organizado.

Un refrigerador organizado es vital para aprovechar al máximo la comida sobrante, y limitar el desperdicio de alimentos. Ordene debidamente el interior de su refrigerador para que pueda encontrar mejor los alimentos, y crear un sistema que funcione para su familia.

Una encuesta reciente de Bosch descubrió que el 61% de las personas creen que desperdiciarían

menos alimentos si su refrigerador tuviera una capacidad de almacenamiento más útil. Use soluciones flexibles de almacenamiento y estanterías para proporcionarle espacio a artículos de mayor altura como pasteles grandes o botellas, de modo que cada centímetro del interior de su refrigerador se aproveche al máximo.

Utilice etiquetas para identificar la comida sobrante con la fecha en que se elaboraron, y guárdela en recipientes herméticos de vidrio.

Es fácil olvidar lo que hay en su refrigerador hasta que ya es demasiado tarde: los recipientes de vidrio no solo son reutilizables y sostenibles, sino que también le permiten ver lo contienen.

2. Elabore recetas que generen óptimas comidas sobrantes.

Muchos estadounidenses eligen lo que van a ingerir en función de si generará o no bastante contenido para futuras comidas.

En la encuesta mencionada, los participantes señalaron que los huevos y el sushi son, con creces, los peores alimentos para mantenerlos como comida sobrante (42% y 33%), mientras que las sopas (79%), la carne (62%) y la pasta (60%) se encuentran entre algunas de las mejores. En lugar

Todos tenemos esa receta que requiere solo una pequeña cantidad de un ingrediente que no se necesita para nada más. Piense en qué pueden convertirse los ingredientes adicionales para ahorrar tiempo y dinero. Por ejemplo, reutilice los restos de verduras para hacer una sopa o un caldo. Mezcle zanahorias, cebollas y otros ingredientes adicionales similares en una bolsa de un galón con cremallera, y colóquela en el congelador. Si prepara el doble de las verduras que necesitará para una comida, tendrá un punto de partida para una sopa o ensalada de pasta más adelante en la semana, sopa de verduras sobrantes.

4. Maximice la frescura con productos y electrodomésticos adecuados.

Elija un refrigerador que cuente con tecnología de frescura diseñada específicamente para extender la vida útil de sus alimentos, a fin de contar con la tranquilidad de saber que sus comidas sobrantes estarán en óptimo estado en los días posteriores a la primera vez que se sirvieron.

También puede congelar la comida sobrante si desea extender su vida útil por un período de tiempo más extenso. Un "truco" de almacenamiento fácil para la sopa o salsa sobrante es congelarlos en latas de magdalenas o bandejas de cubitos de hielo, para tener a mano pequeñas porciones que pueda usar fácilmente en otras comidas.

5. Recaliente su comida sobrante como un profesional.

Hay varias maneras de recalentar mejor la comida sobrante. El 41% de los participantes de la encuesta afirmó que la capacidad de recalentamiento es un factor vital que los incentivaría a comer más alimentos sobrantes.

Su placa de cocción es un método clave para que la comida sobrante sepa como si estuviese acabada de hacer. Es importante saber que, si bien los hornos microondas son útiles cuando contamos con poco tiempo, pueden darle a su comida sobrante una consistencia desagradable. Sin embargo, cocinar a fuego lento en el fogón mantiene el sabor y textura originales. También se puede recalentar la comida sobrante en una placa de inducción para lograr un recalentamiento rápido y preciso, garantizar que la comida sobrante esté uniformemente caliente, y beneficiarse con una fácil limpieza.

2. Cook meals that you already know will make great leftovers.

Many Americans choose their meals based on whether or not they will make good leftovers for future meals. In the survey, Americans noted that eggs and sushi are by far the worst things to keep as leftovers (42% and 33%), whereas soups (79%), meat (62%) and pasta (60%) are among some of the best leftovers. Rather than making that egg frittata for your at-home brunch, consider sweet potato hash browns or cheesy pasta bake so you can enjoy them for

La cocción al vapor es otra excelente manera de recalentamiento, ya que retiene los nutrientes, la humedad y la integridad original de sus comidas. Recaliente en un horno de vapor alimentos como pescado y verduras: ¡y verá que su comida sobrante siempre quedará fresca y sabrosa!

Red Line does not print. It represents the 3” safety area. Please verify critical elements are within the safety area.

6

COMMUNITY

EL OBSERVADOR | www.el-observador.com

JUN 03 - JUN 09, 2022

ENGLISH

OUTGUNNED: WHY CALIFORNIA’S GROUNDBREAKING FIREARMS LAW IS FAILING

T

Robert Lewis CalMatters

The previous year, law enforcement authorities discovered that a Los Angeles County man in the database was trafficking illegal weapons. They found a tactical vest and a pipe bomb in his home.

wo decades ago, California legislators added a new weapon to the state’s growing arsenal of gun-control measures, already among the toughest in the nation. Their motivation came from 2,000 miles away in a shaken Chicago suburb.

It was there that a gunman opened fire in an engine factory where he’d worked for nearly 40 years. He killed four people and wounded four others before pulling the trigger on himself. It was soon revealed that some of the weapons he smuggled inside should have been earlier confiscated because of his past criminal convictions.

In the wake of the rampage, and with lofty expectations, California became the first state in the country to create a database identifying thousands of people who’d legally purchased guns but were now deemed too dangerous to be armed.

In 2020, as the pandemic spread across the months, nearly 300 people on the list tried to buy ammunition but were denied the purchases during background checks mandated in California, according to the Justice Department. Agents investigated and closed 73 cases involving those people, recovering 96 guns.

California enacted a law to remove guns from people deemed too dangerous to be armed. But the measure, plagued by problems, has not achieved its promise. Photo Credit: Illustration by Anne Wernikoff, CalMatters; iStock; California Department of Justice; Alameda County Superior Court

forcement agencies that had received state Justice Department information for their jurisdictions. They provide a glimpse of the stakes behind the statistics.

In a rare display of bipartisanship — especially on an issue as fractious as gun control — the California Legislature wanted to give state and local authorities a methodical way to remove firearms from individuals who’d lost their right to bear them because of violent crimes, serious mental health issues or active restraining orders.

In Santa Paula, a woman in the database has been ordered to surrender her guns because of a mental health-related prohibition. She’s listed as having 22 of them.

In Ukiah, an accused domestic abuser is believed to have 44 guns. A Central Valley man awaiting trial on a rape charge for three years has remained armed despite a court order requiring him to hand over his firearm.

But what seemed at the time like a straightforward approach to the enforcement of existing gun laws has instead become mired in chronic shortcomings, failing for years to make good on its potential. Successive administrations have vowed to fix the problems, but all have fallen short.

One of the names in the database stunned Corina Arias. In 2016, the Kings County grandmother was punched by her nextdoor neighbor, John Marshall Smith, who was convicted of misdemeanor battery.

The conviction carried a 10-year ban on owning a gun in California.

Today, the state is struggling to recover thousands of guns from people who have been ordered to surrender them. At the start of the year, the list compiled by the state Department of Justice had swelled to 24,000 individuals, the most ever. The pandemic only worsened the mounting backlog of cases when some state Justice Department agents were pulled from field enforcement.

“I can’t even believe they’d allow him to be armed,” Arias said when told her attacker was listed by the state in March as having failed to surrender his gun. “It’s a complete shock.” (CalMatters was unable to locate Smith, and his attorney in the case is deceased.)

“We are lucky to have a system that tells us this information,” said Julia Weber, a former supervising attorney for the state courts’ administration who now works on gun policy issues for the Giffords Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence. “But it’s disheartening. It’s a failure of the promise of the system.”

CalMatters spent three months examining the layered troubles of the Armed and Prohibited Persons System, interviewing current and former law enforcement officers, gun control advocates, lawmakers and researchers. The news outlet also contacted hundreds of law enforcement agencies across California to assess their engagement — or lack thereof — with the system.

The state would not provide names of individuals in its database, citing confidentiality restrictions. But CalMatters obtained a small sampling dating back to March through separate requests to local law en-

Top-to-bottom problems stymie success The system’s effectiveness, CalMatters found, is being undermined on numerous fronts.

On the ground, the envisioned collaboration between state and local criminal justice officials to confiscate firearms has been scattershot, at best. Some police departments say they had no idea they even had access to monthly state reports identifying individuals in their jurisdictions who remain unlawfully armed.

At the same time, many judges have done little to ensure their orders requiring gun relinquishments are executed, worsening the backlog and potentially putting the public’s safety at risk.

Meanwhile, understaffed state agents in the Bureau of Firearms are often outmatched by the onslaught of new cases every day from throughout California. Each one must be checked and cross-checked by hand across multiple criminal justice databases

before being added to the prohibited-persons list. Simply put, the additions are coming faster than the subtractions.

The work-intensive process and outmoded technology has led some in law enforcement to question the database’s reliability.

They say they’ve discovered errors during field operations and that investigations based on the list are a waste of resources.

Experts on the system — who note that thousands of guns have, in fact, been removed from individuals — say stakeholders throughout government must summon the resolve to finally fix the system’s deepening problems.

“We’ve made a decision as a society that there are people who, for a constellation of reasons, should not be allowed to have firearms. Are we going to enforce that social decision or not?” asked Garen Wintemute, director of the Violence Prevention Research Program at UC Davis.

To be sure, a person’s inclusion on the list does not mean he or she will act violently with a legally purchased but unlawfully possessed weapon. Gun control advocates struggled to identify shootings that might have been prevented had authorities successfully retrieved firearms. Officials acknowledge that some people on the list may have already surrendered their weapons.

Although the state does not track how many individuals, if any, commit crimes while they continue to remain armed, the agency has good reason to be concerned.

“We’ve made a decision as a society that there are people who should not be allowed to have firearms. Are we going to enforce that social decision or not?”

-GAREN WINTEMUTE, DIRECTOR OF THE VIOLENCE PREVENTION RESEARCH PROGRAM AT UC DAVIS Last year, agents recovered 12 handguns, four rifles, two shotguns, one assault weapon and thousands of rounds of ammunition from a person listed in the database as having 24 firearms. One of the handguns was loaded and unsecured in a bedroom closet of the Norwalk home, where a 16-year-old and 2-year-old also lived.

At the time of its adoption, the Armed and Prohibited Persons System was seen as the low-hanging fruit of gun-control measures—taking firearms from known owners who legally shouldn’t have them.

But today, the inability of state and local agencies to make it work as envisioned has raised questions about how they can begin to confront the wider menace posed by the thousands of illegal firearms circulating throughout California or the new wave of untraceable “ghost guns,” assembled at home from mail-order kits.

“It’s very frustrating to see that we have such a hard time implementing firearms removals in situations where we have all the information in front of us,” said Weber of the Giffords Law Center. “It doesn’t give the public a lot of confidence in our ability to tackle a lot of these more complex firearm issues.”

Stephen Lindley spent more than 15 years in the state Justice Department, including nearly a decade in charge of the Bureau of Firearms before leaving in 2018. He said he was proud of California’s database and its successes removing weapons from potentially dangerous and suicidal individuals.

But he said he also saw up close the many obstacles. You can’t keep adding people to the list, he said, without making sure weapons are being removed from people, too.

“We’re no longer at the front of the pack here,” he said.

A vow to fix California’s gun law — again During his confirmation hearings in summer 2021, State Attorney General Rob Bonta was peppered with questions from lawmakers on how he planned to fix the system. The discussion mostly focused on the need to modernize the database and hire additional agents to investigate cases.

At the start of this year, there were 75 authorized positions in the Bureau of Firearms unit responsible for the Armed and Prohibited Persons System, nicknamed APPS, including special agents, supervisors and trainees. But a third of those spots were vacant, meaning that some 50 individuals in six offices across California were primarily responsible for tens of thousands of guns.

In the past, money has not been the answer.

Following the Newtown, Conn., elementary school mass shooting in

JUN 03 - JUN 09, 2022

COMMUNITY

EL OBSERVADOR | www.el-observador.com

7

ENGLISH 2012, for example, the state added $24 million to address what was then a rising backlog of armed individuals. With that funding, the Justice Department said it could reduce the backlog by 40% over three years, bringing total cases down to 11,900.

It didn’t work, largely because the agency had trouble recruiting and keeping staff.

Bonta said in an interview that he wants to address those staffing shortages and keep pace with advances in technology so overburdened agents don’t have to grapple with a hodge-podge of nearly a dozen outdated databases to create a reliable list. As it stands now, the department can’t even determine the precise breadth of the backlog, including how many cases have remained unresolved for more than six months.

“It is a nation leading system, something that California should be proud of,” Bonta said. “We’re committed to making progress in reducing the APPS list and hope to be able to show you the outcomes and data in the months and year ahead that demonstrates that.”

Holes on the front lines Lost in all the talk about funding and modernization has been an arguably bigger obstacle to success — how to get hundreds of local law enforcement agencies to pick up a heavier share of the burden, as legislators initially envisioned. Building the list is one thing, getting the guns is another.

The Justice Department has for years prepared a monthly report for local agencies across the state showing who in their jurisdictions is in the database. But either the word hasn’t gotten through or the will to act among some local police hasn’t been strong.

Lindley, the former head of the state firearms bureau, said that under his watch the state sent the monthly reports as both a document and spreadsheet so departments could filter data to, say, focus on just local residents with a history of domestic violence or severe mental health issues.

But “agencies didn’t do shit with them,” Lindley said. He later softened his criticism, saying some, like the Los Angeles Police Department, did set up local programs to confiscate the guns. But many agencies didn’t engage.

“The APPS program saves lives,” Lindley said. “And if more agencies invested just a little bit of time into doing that in their own jurisdictions, it would be very beneficial.”

CalMatters asked 400 local law enforcement agencies across California for the most recent monthly reports they’d received regarding unlawfully armed people in their jurisdictions.

About 80 departments indicated they were aware of the report but declined to provide a copy, citing various public records exemptions. Many departments simply didn’t respond.

But more than 150 agencies wrote back saying they didn’t have any such reports.

Although it’s possible an officer in one of

those agencies may have obtained information directly through the Justice Department’s website, numerous police officials said they had no idea what CalMatters was asking about.

“I have been the police chief here for almost eight years. We have never received a report from anyone regarding who has guns that they should not have,” Orange Cove’s police chief wrote in an email. “I have never heard of such a report.”

The same went for Leslie Easley, a records administrator at the Lassen County Sheriff’s Office. “As far as I know, there is no report like that. I’ve never seen one in 15 years here.”

While on the phone with a CalMatters reporter, she logged into a portal where the state shares information with local law enforcement agencies. She tried searching for a monthly armed and prohibited persons report but got only an automated message saying her search yielded no results.

And it wasn’t just smaller agencies that said they were unaware of the reports.

“I’ve never heard of this,” said Maryann Weiman, a senior administrative analyst with the Stockton Police Department. “That might have been nice to know about.” Weiman said she couldn’t rule out the possibility that someone in her 400-person department receives an email. But if the department was using such a document, Weiman said, she’d know about it.

One Northern California department indicated that it would start getting reports as a result of CalMatters’ records request.

“After checking our files, we found that

our agency was not receiving the Armed Prohibited Persons System reports on a monthly or any basis. As such, we have no reports that are subject to release,” Willits Police Chief Fabian E. Lizarraga wrote in an email. “We have now instituted steps to start receiving these reports through the Department of Justice. Thank you.”

“I have been the police chief here for almost eight years. We have never received a report from anyone regarding who has guns that they should not have.”

-MARTY RIVERA, ORANGE COVE’S POLICE CHIEF Questions surrounding the reports publicly surfaced as a result of a 2008 shooting in the Southern California city of Baldwin Park.

In that case, Roy Perez shot and killed his mother, a neighbor and the neighbor’s 4-year-old daughter with a handgun he bought legally in 2004. In the aftermath, authorities acknowledged that Perez was in the state’s database and should have had his guns confiscated three years earlier because of mental health issues.

In a 2011 article on California’s database system, The New York Times noted that Baldwin Park police had failed to regularly read the state’s locally-tailored reports. “Nobody knew where the e-mail was or where it was going,” one lieutenant was quoted as saying.

A decade later, the list apparently still remains a mystery to the Baldwin Park Police Department.

Through a public records request, CalMatters asked the department for the latest

681 Florida-Casa Adelante 681 Florida Street San Francisco, CA 94110 Estudios, Unidades de Vivienda Asequibles de 1, 2 y 3 Recámaras para Individuos y Familias / Igualdad de Oportunidades de Vivienda.

44 Estudios

$718-$1,883 al mes

12 de una recámara

$817-$2,148 al mes

24 de dos recámaras

$888-$2,387 al mes

10 de tres recámaras

$959-$2,624 al mes

Los domiciliarios deben tener un ingreso mensual mínimo de dos veces la renta. Los domiciliarios no deben ganar más que el ingreso mensual bruto que se detalla a continuación: IMP%

1 Persona

2 Personas

3 Personas

4 Personas

5 Personas

6 Personas

7 Personas

35%

$32,650

$37,300

$41,950

$46,600

$50,350

$54,100

$57,800

40%

$37,300

$42,600

$47,950

$53,300

$57,550

$61,800

$66,050

50%

$46,650

$53,300

$59,950

$66,600

$71,950

$77,250

$82,600

60%

$55,950

$63,950

$71,950

$79,900

$86,300

$92,700

$99,100

75%

$69,950

$79,900

$89,950

$99,900

$107,900

$115,900

$123,850

85%

$79,250

$90,550

$101,900

$113,200

$122,250

$131,350

$140,400

Las comodidades del edificio incluirán una sala comunitaria en la planta baja con cocina, completamente accesible por dos elevadores, administración de la propiedad en el lugar, acceso seguro al edificio, cobertura de recepción, almacenamiento seguro de bicicletas. La renta incluirá agua, basura y desagüe.

La información acerca de la solicitud y preferencia se encuentra en el Portal de vivienda de SF - DAHLIA en housing. sfgov.org. Las solicitudes deben presentarse antes de las 5:00 p. m. del 30 de mayo de 2022. Favor de comunicarse con Tenderloin Neighborhood Development Corporation para obtener información sobre el edificio al 415-358-3941 o a ComplianceTeam@tndc.org.

Se realizará un sorteo el 13 de junio de 2022. Los resultados se publicarán en housing.sfgov.org.

Las unidades están disponibles a través de la Oficina de Vivienda y Desarrollo Comunitario del Alcalde de San Francisco y están sujetas al monitoreo y otras restricciones. Visite www.sfmohcd.org para obtener información sobre el programa.

monthly armed prohibited person report.

“There are no responsive documents because the City does not have the report you are requesting,” wrote an attorney representing Baldwin Park. Police department officials did not respond to multiple requests to clarify whether they were aware of the reports.

Every weapon a challenge The system’s mounting backlog reflects, in part, the time-consuming hurdles authorities confront in trying to get thousands of recalcitrant individuals to surrender their firearms — or to verify they’ve already done so. Each one presents its own formidable complexities in a system that, despite the state’s centralized database, is often hitand-miss locally.

Take the case of Roger Martin, who was on the list supplied to Kings County law enforcement in March and obtained by CalMatters. Last year, court records show, he was accused of domestic violence in both criminal and family courts.

Martin, 60, allegedly shoved his wife so hard she fell face first onto the floor and broke her wrist, according to a restraining order request filed by her attorney in September 2020. In the request, the court was informed that Martin possessed firearms.

Martin was arrested and charged criminally for the alleged attack, ultimately pleading no contest to a misdemeanor domestic violence charge.

He was required to surrender his guns in early September when he was first served with the family court’s temporary restraining order. Two months later, the judge presiding over the criminal case issued a protective order, which also barred him from having guns.

Despite the two court orders, Martin for months failed to surrender numerous firearms.

Court records show that in April of this year, the family court appointed a local lawyer to retrieve the guns and give them to Martin’s attorney, who would ensure his client no longer had access to them. Records submitted in the case show that Martin transferred 12 firearms on April 12 for no money to a gun shop in Arizona — seven months after he was ordered to relinquish them.

Attorney David Lange, who represents Martin’s wife, is challenging the transfers because he believes the guns should have been transferred to a licensed dealer in California, as he argues the law requires.

What’s more, he said the gun dealer in Arizona is Martin’s friend.

“He still has access to these guns. I believe this is a sham transfer,” said Lange, who has asked the family court to hold Martin in contempt.

Barring someone from having a gun for a few years, Lange said, allows for a “cooling off period” and gives “time for someone to heal and get over their anger. But it only works if we can actually get the guns away from them. Nobody is following through to make sure it actually happens.”

8

COMMUNITY

EL OBSERVADOR | www.el-observador.com

JUN 03 - JUN 09, 2022

ENGLISH Martin’s attorney in the criminal case referred questions to his family court lawyer, who handled the weapons transfer.

That attorney declined to comment.

In the field, police see flaws up-close Law enforcement officers, meanwhile, face their own roadblocks.

The database is what some refer to as a “pointer system.” It points officers toward possible guns, but it takes investigation and planning to determine if a firearm should be seized and how to do it.

Merely being in the database does not rise to the level of probable cause for authorities to obtain a search warrant and gain access to a home. Instead, officers must resort to knocking on doors, getting people to voluntarily acknowledge they still possess firearms and then convincing them to hand them over — no small feat.

Troy Newton spent 22 years in the Sonoma County Sheriff’s Department before retiring in 2019. Several years ago, he was part of a small team his department assembled to recover guns from people on the list. But it was a bust, he said.

Newton said the team knocked on doors for all of one night before abandoning the effort as a waste of resources that could be directed toward more pressing violent crime problems. Some individuals the team contacted, he said, easily provided proof their guns had been sold long ago, while others claimed they had gotten rid of them but could provide no evidence.

“There was just no way to verify,” Newton said, adding that the state “has no idea who has guns and who’s turned them in.”

Department of Justice officials acknowledge their database isn’t fail-safe.

In 2018, for example, they found that local police routinely failed to update the state’s databases after taking a gun. As a result, state agents concluded that in more than 8% of their investigations that year, the guns in question were already in law enforcement custody.

Even when the information is correct, some people might be on the list because of an apparent misunderstanding or paperwork issue, not because they’re trying to illegally keep their guns.

Christopher Blankenship, a former reserve officer for the Santa Paula Police Department, said he had to “jump through hoops” to get his name off the list. In 2013, he pleaded guilty to a felony for a drunken, off-duty crash that killed another officer. The conviction resulted in a lifetime ban on firearms ownership.

CalMatters contacted Blankenship to determine why, eight years after his conviction, he was among eight individuals who remained listed as unlawfully armed as of March, according to information released

by Santa Paula police through a public records request.

Blankenship said the Justice Department informed him about five or six years ago that he was in the Armed and Prohibited Persons System as owning two guns. He

said he told the agency that he’d given both away as gifts — one to his brother, one to a friend — and provided photos to back up his account. He said he also signed a form attesting that he no longer owned them.

“As far as I knew that was done, taken care,” he said.

But in March, he said, two Ventura County Sheriff’s deputies knocked on his door.

Their department is one of four participating in a pilot project in which local agencies help recover firearms from individuals on the list, an effort that got a $10 million funding boost from the Legislature this year.

Blankenship said they told him he’d have to legally transfer ownership of the gifted weapons in California, otherwise he’d remain in the database.

So in late March, Blackenship said, he drove north to a gun store in Redding, where he met his Oregon friend and transferred ownership of the firearm. He did the same with his brother at a store in Oxnard.

Despite the hassle, Blankenship said, he appreciates the importance of the state’s database. Whether it’s getting guns from dangerous individuals or simply ensuring they’re properly accounted for, “it’s just a good way of making sure they’re handled in a legal, proper way.”

Courting danger One logical place to start confronting the backlog of unlawfully possessed weapons, advocates say, is in the courts, where judges issue the directives prohibiting individuals from possessing firearms because of convictions and restraining orders.

But CalMatters found that California judges, for a variety of reasons, are failing to ensure that their orders are being followed. This forces the Justice Department and local police to play catch-up months later after the names end up in the state’s database.

Department officials flagged the problem in their last two annual reports on the system.

They noted that the percentage of individuals with felony convictions in the database climbed from 47% to 54% between 2019 and 2020, suggesting that “relinquishment regulations at the time of conviction are not being effectively implemented.”

Over the years, there have been efforts — including legislation and voter-approved measures — to ensure guns are being surrendered earlier, at the courthouse level, but many have been stymied by budget barriers, hiring hurdles, technological issues or inconsistent enforcement.

The state has failed, for example, to fully fund a mandate requiring California’s county courts to confiscate or enforce the transfer of firearms “at the time of conviction when an individual is prohibited due to a felony or qualifying misdemeanor,” the Justice Department noted in its 2020 annual report.

A 2001 law also has failed to live up to its billing.

It requires family courts to perform background checks on individuals before issu-

ing domestic violence restraining orders to determine, among other things, criminal histories. A later law expanded the checks to include a review of the state’s vast database of all legal weapons sales. If there’s a match, judges are empowered to convene hearings and hold gun owners in contempt to ensure their weapons are surrendered.

In practice, this hasn’t always happened.

The full background checks only applied to courts with the resources to afford them.

The state Judicial Council was legislatively tasked with determining which courts were too hard-pressed to comply. But that analysis was never done. To this day, state court administrators do not know who’s doing rigorous background checks and who’s not.

In addition, many judges lack access to a confidential Justice Department database that includes all weapons sales, to match against individuals in their courtrooms accused of acts that would bar gun ownership.

Records show that 20% of people in the Armed and Prohibited Persons System — nearly 4,600 gun owners — are under restraining orders.

“Why don’t we give judges access to the purchase records?” said gun researcher Wintemute, who is studying the state’s system. “What if they could say, ‘I got it right here in the computer…You’ve got guns and we’re going to send you home with the bailiff and we want those guns now.’ Just get it done.”

Only 28 superior courts — fewer than half — have access to the Justice Department’s web portal, which includes firearm ownership records and other law enforcement databases, according to the Attorney General’s Office. Although some courts told CalMatters that local sheriff’s offices check firearm ownership for them in domestic violence cases, others acknowledged they’re unable to regularly get such information.

Confusion was evident in the response of Placer County to CalMatters’ queries. The court there initially said it had access to criminal histories, but not firearms ownership. After follow-up questions, a spokesman said the court discovered it did have access to that information and would now use it in domestic violence cases.

Even when family court judges learn an alleged abuser is armed, they don’t always require proof that guns are surrendered.

Too often it’s an “honor system,” said Allison Kephart, the legal director of Weave, a nonprofit that helps domestic abuse survivors in Sacramento County. “It falls on the victim to come back to the court and say, ‘Excuse me, your honor, you told this person they needed to turn their gun in. And I don’t believe they have.’”

A bill advancing through the Legislature, Senate Bill 320, would force family court judges to do more to ensure abusers surrender their weapons. Although a similar bill failed last session, this one has little opposition.

Defiantly armed and dangerous

The price of legislative inertia or judicial inaction can be harrowingly high.

In June 2019, a Fremont woman asked the family court in Alameda County to issue a domestic violence restraining order against her husband, Treveonn White. She alleged that he strangled her and threatened to shoot her.

CalMatters learned of the case through a public records request to county prosecutors for information on individuals with restraining orders who were later charged with firearms possession. CalMatters does not identify alleged abuse victims without their consent.

During a hearing, the 22-year-old woman warned a superior court commissioner, who functions like a judge, that White owned two handguns. Records confirm that he had two registered firearms.

“He’s definitely required to surrender those,” the court commissioner replied, according to hearing transcripts.

The woman was granted a restraining order, which directed White to hand over any guns in his possession to a law enforcement agency or licensed dealer. “The judge will ask you for proof that you did so,” the order states.

There’s no record that the court followed through with the warning—not in hearing transcripts or any documents available in the court file.

There is, however, evidence that White’s wife continued to fear for her safety. Twice, she filed documents with the court saying her husband remained armed. She wanted the court to force him to surrender the weapons but she missed one hearing on her request and was told she incorrectly filled out the paperwork a second time.

Just weeks later, in the middle of the night, White began leaving menacing messages on his wife’s phone.

“I can’t wait. I can’t. I’ll be right there and I’ll be watching when I blow your f—ing brains out,” he said, according to allegations later filed in criminal court.

Terrified, the woman called the police. Fremont officers raced to her house, where they found White parked in the darkness in a black Kia. He had a .22-caliber handgun and a magazine loaded with nine rounds.

White was charged with making criminal threats and possessing a firearm, despite being the subject of a restraining order. Last month he pleaded no contest to illegally carrying a concealed weapon, and the District Attorney’s Office dropped the other charges.

The Alameda County Public Defender’s Office declined to comment on the case.

So, too, did a court spokesman. Nor would the Justice Department confirm whether White was in the state’s Armed and Prohibited Persons System.

But according to a declaration police filed in the case, White did know about the restraining order. When officers asked him why he hadn’t surrendered his firearms, White responded: “F—k that.”

JUN 03 - JUN 09, 2022

EL OBSERVADOR | www.el-observador.com

COMMUNITY

9

ESPAÑOL

SUPERADOS: POR QUÉ ESTÁ FALLANDO LA INNOVADORA LEY DE ARMAS DE FUEGO DE CALIFORNIA Robert Lewis & Neil Chase CalMatters

Investigación para la Prevención de la Violencia en UC Davis

H

El año pasado, los agentes recuperaron 12 pistolas, cuatro rifles, dos escopetas, un arma de asalto y miles de rondas de municiones de una persona que figuraba en la base de datos con 24 armas de fuego. Una de las pistolas estaba cargada y sin asegurar en el armario de un dormitorio de la casa de Norwalk, donde también vivían niños de 16 y 2 años respectivamente.

ace dos décadas, los legisladores de California agregaron una nueva arma al creciente arsenal de medidas de control de armas del estado que ya se encuentra entre las más duras del país. Su motivación provino de 2,000 millas de distancia en un suburbio de Chicago sacudido.

Fue allí donde un pistolero abrió fuego en una fábrica de motores donde había trabajado durante casi 40 años. Mató a cuatro personas e hirió a otras cuatro antes de jalar el gatillo.

Pronto se reveló que algunas de las armas que introdujo de contrabando deberían haber sido confiscadas antes debido a sus antecedentes penales.

A raíz de esto, y con altas expectativas, California se convirtió en el primer estado del país en crear una base de datos que identifica a miles de personas que habían comprado armas legalmente pero que ahora se consideraban demasiado peligrosas para estar armados.

En una rara demostración de bipartidismo, especialmente en un tema tan conflictivo como control de armas – la Legislatura de California quería dar a las autoridades estatales y locales una metodología para quitar las armas de fuego a personas que habrían perdido su derecho debido a delitos violentos, problemas graves de salud mental u órdenes de alejamiento activas.

Pero lo que en ese momento parecía un enfoque directo para la aplicación de las leyes de armas existentes se ha visto envuelto en deficiencias crónicas, fallando por años para hacer valer su potencial. Las administraciones sucesivas han prometido arreglar los problemas, pero todos se han quedado cortos.

Hoy, el estado está luchando por recuperar miles de armas de personas a las que se les ha ordenado que las entreguen. A principios de año, la lista compilada por el Departamento de Justicia del estado había aumentado a 24,000 individuos, unas cifras históricas. La pandemia sólo empeoró la creciente acumulación de casos cuando algunos agentes del Departamento de Justicia del estado fueron retirados de la aplicación de la ley sobre el terreno.

“Tenemos la suerte de tener un sistema que nos da esta información”, dijo Julia Weber, una ex abogada supervisora de la administración de los tribunales estatales que ahora trabaja en cuestiones de política de armas para el Giffords Law Center para prevenir la violencia armada. “Pero es descorazonador. Es un fracaso de la promesa del sistema”.

CalMatters pasó tres meses examinando los problemas del Sistema de Personas Armadas y Prohibidas, entrevistando a oficiales de policía actuales y anteriores, defensores del control de armas, legisladores e investigadores. El medio de comunicación también se puso en contacto con cientos de agencias de aplicación de la ley en todo California para evaluar su participación, o la falta de ella, con el sistema.

“Tenemos la suerte de tener un sistema que nos da esta información, pero es desalentador. Es un fracaso de la promesa del sistema”.

-Julia Weber, ex abogada supervisora de la administración de los tribunales estatales El estado no proporcionó nombres de per-

El año pasado, las autoridades policiales descubrieron que un hombre del condado de Los Ángeles en la base de datos estaba traficando con armas ilegales. Encontraron un chaleco táctico y una bomba de tubo en su casa.

Julia Weber, trabajadora en temas de políticas para el Centro de Leyes de Giffords para prevenir la violencia armada, fue fotografiada en su casa en San Francisco el 19 de julio de 2021.

Photo Credit: Anne Wernikoff / CalMatters

sonas en su base de datos, citando restricciones de confidencialidad. Pero CalMatters obtuvo una pequeña muestra que se remonta a marzo a través de solicitudes separadas a las agencias policiales locales que habían recibido información del Departamento de Justicia estatal para sus jurisdicciones. Proporcionan una idea de lo que está en juego detrás de las estadísticas.

Mientras tanto, los agentes estatales con escasez de personal en la Oficina de Armas de Fuego a menudo son superados por la avalancha de nuevos casos todos los días en California. Cada uno debe ser verificado y cotejado a mano en múltiples bases de datos de justicia penal antes de agregarse a la lista de personas prohibidas. En pocas palabras, las sumas son más rápidas que las restas.

En Santa Paula, se ordenó a una mujer de la base de datos que entregue sus armas debido a una prohibición relacionada con la salud mental. Ella figura en la lista con 22 de ellos.

En Ukiah, se cree que un abusador doméstico acusado tiene 44 armas. Un hombre del Valle Central que espera juicio por un cargo de violación durante tres años ha permanecido armado a pesar de una orden judicial que le exige que entregue su arma de fuego.

El proceso de trabajo intensivo y la tecnología obsoleta han llevado a algunos agentes de la ley a cuestionar la fiabilidad de la base de datos. Dicen que han descubierto errores durante las operaciones de campo y que las investigaciones basadas en la lista son un desperdicio de recursos.

Uno de los nombres de la base de datos sorprendió a Corina Arias. En 2016, la abuela que radica en el condado de Kings fue golpeada por su vecino de al lado, John Marshall Smith, quien fue condenado por delito menor de agresión. La condena también prohibió a Marshall Smith poseer armas de fuego en California por 10 años.

“Ni siquiera puedo creer que le permitieran estar armado”, dijo Arias cuando se enteró que el estado había catalogado a su atacante en marzo por no haber entregado su arma. “Es un shock total”. (CalMatters no pudo localizar a Smith y su abogado en el caso falleció).

Los problemas de arriba hacia abajo obstaculizan el éxito CalMatters descubrió que la eficacia del sistema se ve socavada en numerosos frentes.

En el terreno, la colaboración prevista entre los funcionarios de justicia penal estatales y locales para confiscar armas de fuego ha sido dispersa, en el mejor de los casos. Algunos departamentos de policía dicen que no tenían idea de que incluso tenían acceso a informes estatales mensuales que identificaban a personas en sus jurisdicciones que permanecían ilegalmente armadas.

Al mismo tiempo, muchos jueces han hecho poco para garantizar que sus órdenes se ejecuten, lo que empeora el retraso y potencialmente pone en riesgo la seguridad del público.

Los expertos en el sistema señalan que se han quitado miles de armas a las personas, dicen que las partes interesadas en todo el gobierno deben reunir la determinación para finalmente solucionar los problemas cada vez más profundos del sistema.

“Hemos tomado la decisión como sociedad de que hay personas a las que, por una constelación de razones, no se les debería permitir tener armas de fuego. ¿Vamos a hacer cumplir esa decisión social o no?” preguntó Garen Wintemute, director del Programa de investigación para la prevención de la violencia en UC Davis.

Sin duda, la inclusión de una persona en la lista no significa que actuará violentamente con un arma comprada legalmente pero poseída ilegalmente. Los defensores del control de armas lucharon por identificar los tiroteos que podrían haberse evitado si las autoridades hubieran recuperado con éxito las armas de fuego. Los funcionarios reconocen que es posible que algunas personas de la lista ya hayan entregado sus armas.

Aunque el estado no registra cuántas personas, si las hay, cometen delitos mientras continúan armadas, la agencia tiene buenas razones para estar preocupada.

“Hemos tomado la decisión como sociedad de que hay personas a las que no se les debería permitir tener armas de fuego. ¿Vamos a hacer cumplir esa decisión social o no?”

-Garen Wintemute, director del Programa de

En 2020, a medida que la pandemia se extendía a lo largo de los meses, casi 300 personas en la lista intentaron comprar municiones, pero se les negó la compra durante las verificaciones de antecedentes exigidas en California, según el Departamento de Justicia.

Los agentes investigaron y cerraron 73 casos relacionados con esas personas, recuperando 96 armas.

En el momento de su adopción, el Sistema de Personas Armadas y Prohibidas se consideraba el fruto de las medidas de control de armas al alcance de la mano: tomar armas de fuego de propietarios conocidos que legalmente no deberían tenerlas. “Armas fantasma”. Reunidos en casa desde kits de pedido por correo.

“Es muy frustrante ver que nos cuesta tanto implementar la remoción de armas de fuego en situaciones en las que tenemos toda la información frente a nosotros”, dijo Weber del Giffords Law Center. “No le da al público mucha confianza en nuestra capacidad para abordar muchos de estos problemas más complejos de armas de fuego”.

Stephen Lindley pasó más de 15 años en el Departamento de Justicia del estado, incluida casi una década a cargo de la Oficina de Armas de Fuego antes de partir en 2018. Dijo que estaba orgulloso de la base de datos de California y sus éxitos en la eliminación de armas de personas potencialmente peligrosas y suicidas.

Pero dijo que también vio de cerca los muchos obstáculos. No se puede seguir agregando personas a la lista, dijo, sin asegurarse de que también se eliminen las armas de las personas.

“Ya no estamos al frente del grupo aquí”, dijo.

Un voto para arreglar la ley de armas de California, nuevamente Durante su audiencia de confirmación en el verano de 2021, el fiscal general del estado, Rob Bonta, recibió preguntas de los legisladores sobre cómo planeaba arreglar el sistema. La discusión se centró principalmente en la necesidad de modernizar la base de datos y contratar agentes adicionales para investigar los casos.

A principios de este año, había 75 puestos autorizados en la unidad del Negociado de Armas de Fuego responsable del Sistema de Personas Armadas y Prohibidas (APPS), incluyendo agentes especiales, supervisores y aprendices. Pero un tercio de esos lugares estaban vacantes, lo que significa que unas 50 personas en seis oficinas en California fueron las principales responsables de

10

COMMUNITY

EL OBSERVADOR | www.el-observador.com

JUN 03 - JUN 09, 2022

ESPAÑOL decenas de miles de armas.

Después del tiroteo masivo en la escuela primaria de Newtown, Connecticut en 2012, por ejemplo, el estado agregó 24 millones de dólares para hacer frente a lo que era entonces una creciente acumulación de personas armadas. Con esa financiación, el Departamento de Justicia dijo que podría reducir el retraso en un 40% en tres años, reduciendo el total de casos a 11,900.

No funcionó, en gran parte porque la agencia tuvo problemas para reclutar y retener personal.

Bonta dijo en una entrevista que quiere abordar la escasez de personal y mantenerse al día con los avances tecnológicos para que los agentes sobrecargados no tengan que lidiar con una mezcla de casi una docena de bases de datos obsoletas para crear una lista confiable. Tal como está ahora, el departamento ni siquiera puede determinar la amplitud precisa de la acumulación, incluida la cantidad de casos que han permanecido sin resolver durante más de seis meses.

“Es un sistema líder a nivel nacional, algo de lo que California debería estar orgullosa”, dijo Bonta. “Estamos comprometidos a avanzar en la reducción de la lista de APPS y esperamos poder mostrarle los resultados y los datos en los próximos meses y años que lo demuestren”.

Agujeros en el frente Perdido en toda la charla sobre financiamiento y modernización ha sido un obstáculo posiblemente mayor para el éxito: cómo lograr que cientos de agencias locales de aplicación de la ley asuman una parte más pesada de la carga, como los legisladores inicialmente imaginaron.

Construir la lista es una cosa, conseguir las armas es otra.

posible que un oficial de una de esas agencias haya obtenido información directamente a través del sitio web del Departamento de Justicia, numerosos oficiales de policía dijeron que no tenían idea de lo que preguntaba CalMatters.

“He sido el jefe de policía aquí durante casi ocho años. Nunca hemos recibido un informe de nadie sobre quién tenga armas que no debería tener”, escribió el jefe de policía de Orange Cove en un correo electrónico. “Nunca había oído hablar de un informe así”.

Lo mismo ocurrió con Leslie Easley, administradora de registros de la Oficina del Sheriff del condado de Lassen. “Hasta donde yo sé, no hay un informe como ese. Nunca he visto uno en 15 años aquí “.

que comenzaría a recibir informes como resultado de la solicitud de registros de CalMatters.

informe mensual de personas armadas prohibidas.

“Después de revisar nuestros archivos, descubrimos que nuestra agencia no estaba recibiendo los informes del Sistema de Personas Armadas Prohibidas mensualmente o de cualquier forma. Como tal, no tenemos informes que estén sujetos a publicación”, escribió en un correo electrónico el jefe de policía de Willits, Fabian E. Lizarraga. “Ahora hemos instituido pasos para comenzar a recibir estos informes a través del Departamento de Justicia. Gracias.”

“No hay documentos de respuesta porque la Ciudad no tiene el informe que solicita”, escribió un abogado que representa a Baldwin Park. Los funcionarios del departamento de policía no respondieron a múltiples solicitudes para aclarar si estaban al tanto de los informes.

Las preguntas sobre los informes surgieron públicamente como resultado de un tiroteo en 2008 en la ciudad de Baldwin Park, en el sur de California.

Pero “las agencias no hicieron una mierda con ellos”, dijo Lindley. Más tarde suavizó sus críticas y dijo que algunos, como el Departamento de Policía de Los Ángeles, establecieron programas locales para confiscar las armas. Pero muchas agencias no participaron.

“El programa APPS salva vidas”, dijo Lindley. “Y si más agencias invirtieran un poco de tiempo en hacerlo en sus propias jurisdicciones, sería muy beneficioso”.

En ese caso, Roy Perez disparó y mató a su madre, un vecino y a la hija de 4 años del vecino con una pistola que compró legalmente en 2004. Después, las autoridades reconocieron que Pérez estaba en la base de datos del estado y que deberían haberle confiscado sus armas tres años antes debido a problemas de salud mental.

Y no fueron solo las agencias más pequeñas las que dijeron que desconocían los informes.

En un artículo de 2011 sobre el sistema de bases de datos de California, The New York Times señaló que la policía de Baldwin Park no había leído con regularidad los informes del estado adaptados localmente. “Nadie sabía dónde estaba el correo electrónico o adónde iba”, dijo un teniente.

Martin, de 60 años, presuntamente empujó a su esposa con tanta fuerza que cayó al suelo y se rompió la muñeca, según una solicitud de orden de restricción presentada por su abogado en septiembre de 2020. En la solicitud, se informó al tribunal que Martin poseía armas de fuego.

Una década después, la lista aparentemente sigue siendo un misterio para el Departamento de Policía de Baldwin Park.

Martin fue arrestado y acusado penalmente por el presunto ataque, y finalmente no impugnó un cargo menor de violencia doméstica.

“Nunca había oído hablar de esto”, dijo Maryann Weiman, analista administrativa senior del Departamento de Policía de Stockton. “Eso podría haber sido bueno saberlo”. Weiman dijo que no podía descartar la posibilidad de que alguien de su departamento de 400 personas reciba un correo electrónico. Pero si el departamento estaba usando un documento así, dijo Weiman, ella lo sabría.

Un departamento del norte de California indicó

A través de una solicitud de registros públicos, CalMatters solicitó al departamento el último

Pero más de 150 agencias respondieron diciendo que no tenían tales informes. Aunque es

Tomemos el caso de Roger Martin, que estaba en la lista proporcionada a la policía del condado de Kings en marzo y obtenida por CalMatters. El año pasado, según muestran los registros judiciales, Martin fue acusado de violencia doméstica en los tribunales.

Se le exigió que entregara sus armas a principios de septiembre cuando recibió la orden de restricción temporal del tribunal de familia por primera vez. Dos meses después, el juez que presidía el caso penal emitió una orden de protección, que también le prohibía tener armas.

A pesar de las dos órdenes judiciales, Martin no entregó numerosas armas de fuego.

Martin fue arrestado y acusado penalmente por el presunto ataque, y finalmente no impugnó un cargo menor de violencia doméstica.

Se le exigió que entregara sus armas a principios de septiembre cuando recibió la orden de restricción temporal del tribunal de familia por primera vez. Dos meses después, el juez que presidía el caso penal emitió una orden de protección, que también le prohibía tener armas.

APRENDE NUEVAS HABILIDADES

A pesar de las dos órdenes judiciales, Martin durante meses sin entregó numerosas armas de fuego.

AYUDA A LOS DEMÁS

CalMatters solicitó a 400 agencias policiales locales en todo California los informes mensuales más recientes que habían recibido sobre personas armadas ilegalmente en sus jurisdicciones.

Alrededor de 80 departamentos indicaron que estaban al tanto del informe, pero se negaron a proporcionar una copia, citando varias exenciones de registros públicos. Muchos departamentos simplemente no respondieron.

La creciente acumulación de retrasos en el sistema refleja, en parte, los obstáculos que las autoridades enfrentan al tratar de lograr que miles de personas recalcitrantes entreguen sus armas de fuego, o para verificar que ya lo han hecho. Cada uno presenta sus propias formidables complejidades en un sistema que, a pesar de la base de datos centralizada del estado, a menudo es impredecible a nivel local.

Mientras hablaba por teléfono con un reportero de CalMatters, inició sesión en un portal donde el estado comparte información con las agencias locales de aplicación de la ley. Intentó buscar un informe mensual de personas armadas y prohibidas, pero solo recibió un mensaje automático que decía que su búsqueda no arrojó resultados.

El Departamento de Justicia ha preparado durante años un informe mensual para las agencias locales en todo el estado que muestra quién en sus jurisdicciones está en la base de datos. Pero o la palabra no ha llegado o la voluntad de actuar entre algunos policías locales no ha sido fuerte.

Lindley, el exjefe de la oficina estatal de armas de fuego, dijo que, bajo su supervisión, el estado enviaba los informes mensuales como un documento y una hoja de cálculo para que los departamentos pudieran filtrar los datos para, digamos, centrarse solo en los residentes locales con antecedentes de violencia doméstica o violencia doméstica grave. problemas de salud mental.

Cada arma es un desafío

GANA DINERO AYUDANDO Para más información visita: WWW.CACOLLEGECORPS.COM

Los registros judiciales muestran que en abril de este año, el tribunal de familia nombró a un abogado local para recuperar las armas y entregárselas al abogado de Martin, quien se aseguraría de que su cliente ya no tuviera acceso a ellas. Los registros presentados en el caso muestran que Martin transfirió 12 armas de fuego el 12 de abril sin dinero a una tienda de armas en Arizona, siete meses después de que se le ordenó entregarlas.

El abogado David Lange, que representa a la esposa de Martin, está impugnando las transferencias porque cree que las armas deberían haber sido transferidas a un comerciante autorizado en California, como la ley lo requiere.

Además, dijo que el traficante de armas en Arizona es amigo de Martin.

“Todavía tiene acceso a estas armas.

Creo que esta es una transferencia falsa”,

JUN 03 - JUN 09, 2022

EL OBSERVADOR | www.el-observador.com

COMMUNITY

11

ESPAÑOL dijo Lange, quien pidió al tribunal de familia que declare en desacato a Martin.

Salvo que alguien tenga un arma durante unos años, dijo Lange, permite un “período de enfriamiento” y da “tiempo para que alguien se cure y supere su enojo”. Pero solo funciona si realmente podemos quitarles las armas. Nadie está cumpliendo para asegurarse de que realmente suceda”.

El abogado de Martin en el caso penal remitió las preguntas a su abogado de la corte de familia, quien manejó la transferencia de armas.

El abogado se negó a comentar al respecto.

En el campo, la policía ve las fallas de cerca Mientras tanto, los agentes del orden se enfrentan a sus propios obstáculos.

La base de datos es lo que algunos denominan “sistema de punteros”. Señala a los oficiales hacia posibles armas, pero se necesita investigación y planificación para determinar si se debe incautar un arma de fuego y cómo hacerlo.

El simple hecho de estar en la base de datos no se eleva al nivel de causa probable para que las autoridades obtengan una orden de registro y accedan a una casa. En cambio, los agentes deben recurrir a tocar puertas, hacer que las personas reconozcan voluntariamente que todavía poseen armas de fuego y luego convencerlas de que las entreguen, lo que no es poca cosa.

Troy Newton pasó 22 años en el Departamento del Sheriff del condado de Sonoma antes de retirarse en 2019. Hace varios años, formó parte de un pequeño equipo que su departamento reunió para recuperar armas de personas en la lista. Pero fue un fracaso, dijo.

Newton dijo que el equipo tocó puertas durante toda una noche antes de abandonar el esfuerzo como un desperdicio de recursos que podrían dirigirse hacia problemas de crímenes violentos más urgentes. Algunas personas con las que el equipo se puso en contacto, dijo, proporcionaron pruebas fácilmente de que sus armas han sido vendidas hace mucho tiempo, mientras que otras afirmaron que se deshecho de ellas pero no pudieron proporcionar pruebas.

“Simplemente no había forma de verificar”, dijo Newton, y agregó que el estado “no tiene quién idea de quién tiene armas y las entregó”.

Los funcionarios del Departamento de Justicia reconocen que su base de datos no es a prueba de fallas.

En 2018, por ejemplo, descubrieron que la policía local habitualmente no actualizaba las bases de datos del estado después de tomar un arma. Como resultado, los agentes estatales concluyeron que en más del 8% de sus investigaciones ese año, las armas en cuestión ya estaban bajo custodia policial .

Incluso cuando la información es correcta, algunas personas pueden estar en la lista debido a un malentendido o un problema de papeleo, no porque estén tratando de mantener ilegalmente sus armas.

Christopher Blankenship, un ex oficial de reserva del Departamento de Policía de Santa Paula, dijo que tuvo que “saltar por el aro” para sacar su nombre de la lista. En 2013, se declaró culpable de un delito grave por un accidente en estado de ebriedad fuera de servicio que mató a otro oficial. La condena resultó en una prohibición de por vida de la posesión de armas de fuego.

CalMatters se puso en contacto con Blankenship para determinar por qué, ocho años

después de su condena, se encontraba entre las ocho personas que seguían enumeradas como armadas ilegalmente hasta marzo, según información divulgada por la policía de Santa Paula a través de una solicitud de registros públicos.

Blankenship dijo que el Departamento de Justicia le informó hace unos cinco o seis años que estaba en el Sistema de Personas Armadas y Prohibidas por poseer dos armas. Blankenship comentó que firmó un formulario que acredita que ya no las posee (armas).

“Por lo que yo sabía, se hizo, se ocupó”, dijo.

Pero en marzo, dijo, dos agentes del alguacil del condado de Ventura llamaron a su puerta.

Su departamento es uno de los cuatro que participan en un proyecto piloto en el que las agencias locales ayudan a recuperar armas de fuego de las personas en la lista, un esfuerzo que obtuvo un impulso de financiación de $10 millones de la Legislatura este año.

de 2020.

Una ley de 2001 tampoco ha cumplido con su facturación.

Requiere que los tribunales de familia efectúen verificaciones de antecedentes sobre las personas antes de emitir órdenes de restricción por violencia doméstica para determinar, entre otras cosas, antecedentes penales. Una ley posterior fue aprobada para que las autoridades tuvieran acceso a revisar la amplia base de datos del estado de todas las ventas de armas legales. Si hay una coincidencia, los jueces están autorizados a convocar audiencias y despreciar a los propietarios de armas para garantizar que sus armas sean entregadas.

A pesar de los esfuerzos, esto no ha sucedido.

Blankenship comentó que la agencia le informó que tendría que transferir legalmente la propiedad de las armas en California, de lo contrario permanecería en la base de datos.

Las verificaciones de antecedentes completas solo se aplicaron a los tribunales con los recursos para pagarlas. El Consejo Judicial del Estado tenía la tarea legislativa de determinar qué tribunales estaban en apuros para cumplir.

Pero ese análisis nunca se hizo. Hasta el día de hoy, los administradores de los tribunales estatales no saben quién está haciendo verificaciones de antecedentes rigurosas y quién no.

Entonces, a fines de marzo, Blackenship condujo hacia el norte hasta una tienda de armas en Redding, donde se reunió con su amigo de Oregon y transfirió el arma de fuego. Hizo lo mismo con su hermano en una tienda de Oxnard.

Además, muchos jueces carecen de acceso a una base de datos confidencial del Departamento de Justicia que incluya ventas de armas, para compararlas con las personas en sus salas de audiencias acusadas de actos que impedirían la posesión de armas.

A pesar de la molestia, dijo Blankenship, aprecia la importancia de la base de datos del estado. Ya sea para obtener armas de personas peligrosas o simplemente para asegurarse de que se contabilicen correctamente. “Es una buena manera de asegurarse de que se manejen de manera legal y adecuada”.

Los registros muestran que el 20% de las personas en el Sistema de Personas Armadas y Prohibidas, casi 4,600 propietarios de armas, están bajo órdenes de restricción.

Cortejo de peligro Un lugar lógico para comenzar a enfrentar la acumulación de armas poseídas ilegalmente, dicen los defensores, es en los tribunales, donde los jueces emiten las directivas que prohíben a las personas poseer armas de fuego debido a condenas y órdenes de restricción.

Pero CalMatters descubrió que los jueces de California, por una variedad de razones, no se aseguran de que se sigan sus órdenes.

Esto obliga al Departamento de Justicia y a la policía local a ponerse al día meses después de que los nombres terminen en la base de datos del estado.

Los funcionarios del departamento señalaron el problema en sus dos últimos informes anuales sobre el sistema.

Señalaron que el porcentaje de personas con condenas por delitos graves en la base de datos aumentó de 47% a 54% entre 2019 y 2020, lo que sugiere que “las regulaciones de renuncia al momento de la condena no se están implementando de manera efectiva”.

A lo largo de los años, se han realizado esfuerzos, incluida la legislación y medidas aprobadas por los votantes – para garantizar que las armas se entreguen antes, a nivel de juzgado, pero muchas se han visto obstaculizadas por barreras presupuestarias, obstáculos en la contratación, problemas tecnológicos o aplicación inconsistente.

El estado no ha podido financiar completamente un mandato que requiere que los tribunales del condado de California confisquen o hagan cumplir la transferencia de armas de fuego “en el momento de la condena cuando una persona está prohibida debido a un delito grave o un delito menor calificado”, señaló el Departamento de Justicia en su informe anual

“¿Por qué no les damos a los jueces acceso a los registros de compras?” dijo el investigador de armas Wintemute, que está estudiando el sistema del estado. “¿Qué pasaría si pudieran decir: ‘Lo tengo aquí mismo en la computadora … Tienes armas y te enviaremos a casa con el alguacil y queremos esas armas ahora’.

Solo hazlo”.

Solo 28 tribunales superiores, menos de la mitad, tienen acceso a la Portal web del Departamento de Justicia, que incluye registros de propiedad de armas de fuego y otras bases de datos policiales, según la Oficina del Fiscal General. Aunque algunos tribunales le dijeron a CalMatters que las oficinas del alguacil local verifican la propiedad de armas de fuego en casos de violencia doméstica, otros reconocieron que no pueden obtener dicha información con regularidad.

La confusión fue evidente en la respuesta del condado de Placer a las consultas de CalMatters. El tribunal inicialmente dijo que tenía acceso a antecedentes penales, pero no a la propiedad de armas de fuego. Después de preguntas de seguimiento, un portavoz dijo que el tribunal descubrió que sí tenía acceso a esa información y que ahora la usaría en casos de violencia doméstica.

Incluso cuando los jueces de los tribunales de familia se enteran de que un presunto abusador está armado, no siempre exigen pruebas de que se entregan las armas.

Con demasiada frecuencia es un “sistema de honor”, dijo Allison Kephart, directora legal de tejer, una organización sin fines de lucro que ayuda a sobrevivientes de abuso doméstico en el condado de Sacramento. “Le corresponde a la víctima regresar a la corte y decir: ‘Disculpe, señoría, le dijo a esta persona que necesitaban entregar su arma. Y no creo que lo hayan hecho’”.

Un proyecto de ley que avanza en la Legislatura, El proyecto de ley 320 del Senado obligaría a los jueces de los tribunales de familia a

hacer más para garantizar que los abusadores entreguen sus armas. Aunque un proyecto de ley similar fracasó en la última sesión, este tiene poca oposición.

Desafiantemente armado y peligroso El precio de la inercia legislativa o la inacción judicial puede ser terriblemente alto.

En junio de 2019, una mujer de Fremont pidió al tribunal de familia del condado de Alameda que emitiera una orden de restricción por violencia doméstica contra su esposo, Treveonn White. Ella alegó que él la estranguló y amenazó con dispararle.

CalMatters se enteró del caso a través de una solicitud de registros públicos a los fiscales del condado para obtener información sobre personas con órdenes de restricción que luego fueron acusadas de posesión de armas de fuego. CalMatters no identifica a las presuntas víctimas de abuso sin su consentimiento.

Durante una audiencia, la mujer de 22 años advirtió a un comisionado de la corte superior, que funciona como un juez, que White tenía dos pistolas. Los registros confirman que tenía dos armas de fuego registradas.

“Definitivamente está obligado a entregarlos”, respondió el comisionado de la corte, según las transcripciones de la audiencia.

A la mujer se le otorgó una orden de restricción, que ordenó a White que entregara cualquier arma que tuviera en su poder a una agencia de aplicación de la ley o un comerciante autorizado. “El juez le pedirá pruebas de que lo hizo”, dice la orden.

No hay constancia de que el tribunal haya cumplido con la advertencia, ni al escuchar las transcripciones ni ningún documento disponible en el expediente judicial.

Sin embargo, hay evidencia de que la esposa de White seguía temiendo por su seguridad.

Dos veces presentó documentos ante el tribunal en los que decía que su marido seguía armado. Quería que la corte lo obligara a entregar las armas, pero se perdió una audiencia por su solicitud y le dijeron que llenó incorrectamente el papeleo por segunda vez.

Solo unas semanas después, en medio de la noche, White comenzó a dejar mensajes amenazantes en el teléfono de su esposa.

“No puedo esperar. No puedo. Estaré allí mismo y estaré observando cuando te vuele los sesos”, según las acusaciones presentadas más tarde en la corte penal.

Aterrada, la mujer llamó a la policía. Los oficiales de Fremont corrieron a su casa, donde encontraron a White estacionado en la oscuridad en un Kia negro. Tenía una pistola calibre 22 y un cargador cargado con nueve rondas.

White fue acusado de realizar amenazas criminales y poseer un arma de fuego, a pesar de ser objeto de una orden de restricción. El mes pasado se declaró sin oposición por portar ilegalmente un arma oculta, y la Fiscalía del Distrito retiró los otros cargos.

La Oficina del Defensor Público del Condado de Alameda se negó a comentar sobre el caso. El Departamento de Justicia tampoco confirmó si White estaba en el Sistema de Personas Armadas y Prohibidas del estado.

Pero según una declaración de la policía, White sí sabía sobre la orden de restricción.

Cuando los oficiales le preguntaron por qué no había entregado sus armas de fuego, White respondió: “F-k eso”.

12

VIBRAS

JUN 03 - JUN 09, 2022

EL OBSERVADOR | www.el-observador.com

Photo Credit: Isi Parente / Pexels

¿QUÉ DEBE HACER SI VE SOMBRAS, ESPÍRITUS O FANTASMAS?

V

Mario Jiménez Castillo El Observador

ivimos tiempos complicados desde el año 2020, y últimamente han ocurrido muchos actos de violencia, masacres y muerte. Personas desquiciadas son poseídas, existen muchos malos espíritus en la Tierra, y ahora aún más. La misma Biblia relata en gran medida todo lo que ahora estamos viviendo, basta leer el Libro de Revelaciones de San Juan, “Apocalipsis”. Las apariciones y almas en pena son parte de la humanidad, han existido desde siempre y en muchos casos, suelen atormentar a las personas, en otros casos entran en posesión de cuerpos que tienen un espíritu debilitado. He escuchado de muchas personas conocidas, el hecho de que ven sombras, siluetas, apariciones y fantasmas; incluso algunos padres de familia, me han relatado que sus hijos ven sombras oscuras entrando y saliendo de las habitaciones.

Si esto le está ocurriendo en este momento, no crea que ha perdido la razón, los espíritus coexisten entre nosotros. Y como todo en esta vida, los hay buenos, y los hay malos.

Si siente que una mala vibra le persigue o si observa siluetas oscuras que aparecen y desaparecen, no está solo, a mucha gente le está sucediendo prácticamente lo mismo.

Existen maneras de alejar o hasta anular esas energías negativas. Si esto ocurre en su casa, lo primero que debe hacer es ordenar y organizar su hogar, desechar y reciclar lo que ya no es de utilidad, hacer una buena limpieza y posteriormente, quemar incienso. El aroma del incienso aleja las malas vibraciones. Rocíe por toda su vivienda agua bendita y haga rezos. Elija las oraciones más significativas para usted e inicie su rezo con el Salmo 91.

Es de bien para todos el establecer contacto con las divinidades. Las actividades espirituales que involucran rezos y alabanzas, crean una aura protectora en la persona que les realiza. También se aconseja que cuando se mude a otro hogar, antes de mudar sus pertenencias, primero haga una limpia allí.

De ese modo neutralizará las energías extrañas que esa morada pueda poseer. Si

siente presencias oscuras a su alrededor, hágase un enjuague con el agua de cinco cocos, líquido al que debe añadirle unas gotas de agua florida. Y rece al despertar y al acostarse el Salmo 23. Las presencias negativas tienen cierto poder, pero ese no se compara al poder del Altísimo y Creador; quien está junto a Él, vence cualquier batalla.

Salmo 91 Tú que vives al amparo del Altísimo y resides a la sombra del Todopoderoso, di al Señor: «Mi refugio y mi baluarte, mi Dios, en quien confío» El te librará de la red del cazador y de la peste perniciosa; te cubrirá con sus plumas, y hallarás un refugio bajo sus alas.

No temerás los terrores de la noche, ni la flecha que vuela de día, ni la peste que acecha en las tinieblas, ni la plaga que devasta a pleno sol.

Aunque caigan mil a tu izquierda y diez mil a tu derecha, tú no serás alcanzado: su brazo es escudo y coraza.

Con sólo dirigir una mirada, verás el castigo de los malos, porque hiciste del Señor tu refugio y pusiste como defensa al Altísimo.

No te alcanzará ningún mal, ninguna plaga se acercará a tu carpa, porque hiciste del Señor tu refugio y pusiste como defensa al Altísimo.

Ellos te llevarán en sus manos, para que no tropieces contra ninguna piedra; caminarás sobre leones y víboras, pisotearás cachorros de león y serpientes. «Él se entregó a mí, por eso, yo lo glorificaré; lo protegeré, porque conoce mi Nombre; me invocará, y yo le responderé.

Estaré con él en el peligro, lo defenderé y lo glorificaré; le haré gozar de una larga vida y le haré ver mi salvación»

JUN 03 - JUN 09, 2022

EL OBSERVADOR | www.el-observador.com

TRADING SKEPTICISM FOR SUPPORT: HOW PARENTS CAN SUPPORT KIDS WITH THINKING AND LEARNING DIFFERENCES

CAMBIAR ESCEPTICISMO POR APOYO: CÓMO LOS PADRES PUEDEN AYUDAR A LOS NIÑOS CON DIFERENCIAS EN LA MANERA DE PENSAR Y APRENDER

BPT

"Sea la razón" con el propósito de aumentar la conciencia y la participación de los padres en torno a la neurodiversidad. Los padres pueden involucrarse participando en el desafío en redes sociales #YouCanBeTheReason liderado por The Holderness Family (influyentes personalidades en Internet), y explicar cómo han sido ellos la razón del progreso de sus hijos. La campaña también incluye un cortometraje e historias desde las perspectivas de niños con diferencias en la manera de pensar y aprender, así como un kit de actividades para ayudar a los padres a iniciar conversaciones con sus hijos.

ne in five kids - nearly 70 million Americans - have learning or thinking differences (LTDs), like ADHD or dyslexia.

While LTDs are common among families, friends, neighbors and peers, new research from Understood.org, a guide and resource for people with LTDs, finds that there are still harmful stigmas associated with them - stigmas that often negatively impact children's mental health and prevent parents from taking steps to get their child proper support.

According to Understood.org's "Neurodiversity and Stigma Study," 90% of parents believe there are children with LTDs, yet more than half (55%) of those with neurodivergent children say they are afraid to tell others about their child's LTD because of associated biases. Additionally, 69% of parents of kids with LTDs say that these stigmas negatively impact their child's mental well-being.

This is why Understood launched the "Be the Reason" campaign - to increase awareness and engagement of parents around neurodiversity. Parents can get involved by participating in the #YouCanBeTheReason social media challenge, led by social media influencers the Holderness Family, and share how they've been the reason their child thrives.

The campaign also includes a short film and stories from the perspectives of children with LTDs, as well as an activity kit to help parents initiate conversations with their children.

"When parents engage with their kids around their emotional and academic challenges, particularly if they believe the challenges may be related to a learning difference, it can be incredibly powerful," said Dr. Andy Kahn, a licensed psychologist and Understood expert specializing in LTDs. "Parent support has an enormous impact on a child's ability to thrive, and the 'Be the Reason' campaign is a step to provide parents with tools to help them and their kids get there."

If your child has or may have a learning or thinking difference, here are some important steps you can take, according to Kahn and Understood: 1) Talk with your child The most important step is engaging with your child and making sure they know you're ready to help.

To get a better sense of the challenges they're experiencing, try asking open-ended questions like: "What made you laugh today?

What was the peak and pit of your day?"

These questions will give you a better sense of what your child is feeling and why.

You can also use a feelings wheel, which helps kids make connections between feelings, body sensations and words, and helps kids express their emotions.

2) Engage teachers and caregivers Proactively engaging with your child's teachers and other caregivers, such as pediatricians, coaches and tutors, will help you get a 360-degree view of what your child may be experiencing at home, school and in other activities.

13

ESPAÑOL

ENGLISH

O

EDUCATION

"Cuando los padres hablan con sus hijos sobre sus desafíos emocionales y académicos, particularmente si creen que los mismos pueden estar relacionados con una diferencia de aprendizaje, puede ser algo increíblemente poderoso", asegura el Dr. Andy Kahn, psicólogo y experto de Understood especializado en diferencias en la manera de pensar y aprender. "El apoyo de los padres tiene un impacto enorme en la capacidad de un niño para prosperar, y la campaña 'Sea la razón' es un paso para proporcionarles herramientas que los ayuden a ellos y a sus hijos a logralo".

Photo Credit: BPT

These conversations also allow for collaboration with other caregivers to ensure your child gets appropriate support. There are many accommodations that can be made at school - like additional time for tasks or sensory tools - to support your child's emotional and academic development.

3) Practice self-calming strategies LTDs affect your child academically, emotionally and socially. Things like deep breathing, stretching and yoga can help kids calm their bodies, become more aware of how they feel and manage their emotions.

In moments of high stress, help your child pause and "scan" their body from head to toe, checking for signs of tension, pain or discomfort. Being able to identify and acknowledge the physical effects of stress and sadness is a first step to releasing them.

If you're a parent looking for more tips and resources, visit the "Be the Reason" campaign website, and be sure to participate in the #YouCanBeTheReason social media challenge across TikTok, Instagram and Facebook. To learn more about symptoms of LTDs, visit understood.org/take-note.

U

BPT

no de cada cinco niños estadounidenses - casi 70 millones - tienen diferencias en la manera de pensar y aprender como el TDAH o la dislexia. Si bien las diferencias en la manera de pensar y aprender son comunes entre familias, amigos, vecinos y compañeros, una nueva investigación de Understood.org, una guía y un recurso para las personas que piensan y aprenden de manera diferente, revela que continúan existiendo estigmas dañinos asociados con esas diferencias, que a menudo afectan negativamente la salud mental de los niños e impiden que los padres tomen medidas para que sus hijos reciban el apoyo que necesitan.

Según la investigación "Neurodiversity and Stigma Study" (Estudio sobre la neurodiversidad y el estigma) realizada por Understood.org, el 90% de los padres participantes creen que hay niños que tienen diferencias en la manera de pensar y aprender. Sin embargo, más de la mitad (55%) de los que tienen hijos neurodivergentes afirman que sienten temor de hablar de las diferencias de su hijo con otras personas debido a los prejuicios asociados con esas diferencias. Además, el 69% de los padres de niños que piensan y aprenden de manera diferente afirman que estos estigmas afectan negativamente el bienestar mental de sus hijos.

Es por eso que Understood creó la campaña

Regístrese. Vote temprano. Participe como Voluntario.

7 DE JUNIO DE 2022, ELECCIÓN PRIMARIA DIRECTA ESTATAL La Votación por el 9 de mayo Correo comienza

1) Hablar con su hijo El paso más importante es colaborar con su hijo y asegurarse de que sepa que usted está listo para ayudarlo.

Para entender mejor los desafíos que están experimentando, intente hacer preguntas abiertas como: "¿Qué te hizo reír hoy?" o ¿Cuál fue el mejor y el peor momento del día?". Estas preguntas le darán una mejor idea de lo que su hijo está sintiendo y por qué.

También puede usar una rueda de las emociones, que ayuda a los niños a hacer conexiones entre los sentimientos, las sensaciones corporales y las palabras, y a expresar sus emociones.

2) Colaborar con maestros y cuidadores Colaborar proactivamente con los maestros de su hijo y otros cuidadores como pediatras, entrenadores y tutores, lo ayudará a obtener una visión total de lo que su hijo puede estar experimentando en el hogar, la escuela y en otras actividades.

Estas conversaciones también permiten la colaboración con otros cuidadores para garantizar que su hijo reciba el apoyo adecuado. Hay muchas adaptaciones que se pueden implementar en la escuela, como tiempo adicional para realizar tareas o herramientas sensoriales para respaldar el desarrollo emocional y académico de su hijo.

3) Practicar técnicas de relajación Las diferencias en la manera de pensar y aprender afectan a su hijo en lo académico, emocional y social. Prácticas como la respiración profunda, el estiramiento y el yoga pueden ayudar a los niños a calmar sus cuerpos, ser más conscientes de cómo se sienten y controlar sus emociones.

En momentos de mucho estrés, ayude a su hijo a hacer una pausa y "escanear" su cuerpo de la cabeza a los pies para notar si hay signos de tensión, dolor o incomodidad. Ser capaz de identificar y reconocer los efectos físicos del estrés y la tristeza es un primer paso para liberarnos de ellos.

Votación en Persona en la del 9 de mayo Oficina del Registro de Votantes al 7 de junio Los Centros de del 28 de mayo Votación Abren al 7 de junio

Si su hijo tiene o pudiera tener una diferencia en la manera de pensar y aprender, estas son algunas medidas importantes que puede tomar, según Kahn y Understood:

www. sccvote.org 866 430-VOTE (8683)

Si usted es un padre que busca más consejos y recursos, visite el sitio web de la campaña "Sea la razón" y participe en el desafío #YouCanBeTheReason en TikTok, Instagram y Facebook.

Para obtener más información sobre los síntomas de las diferencias en la manera de pensar y aprender, visite understood.org/take-note.

14

JUN 03 - JUN 09, 2022

EL OBSERVADOR | www.el-observador.com

PUBLIC NOTICE | AVISO DE DISPONIBILIDAD/CONVOCATORIA DE LA REUNIÓN DE LA JUNTA DIRECTIVA DE LA AUTORIDAD Proyecto Ferroviario de Alta Velocidad de California–Sección del Proyecto de San Francisco a San José INFORME DE IMPACTO AMBIENTAL / DECLARACIÓN DE IMPACTO AMBIENTAL FINAL La Autoridad del Tren de Alta Velocidad de California (la Autoridad) anuncia la disponibilidad del Informe de Impacto Ambiental (EIR)/Declaración de Impacto Ambiental (EIS) Final para la Sección de San Francisco a San José del Proyecto Ferroviario de Alta Velocidad de California.

El EIR/EIS Final de la sección del proyecto de San Francisco a San José y los documentos asociados estarán disponibles al público el viernes 10 de junio de 2022. El EIR/EIS Final estará disponible en línea en formato PDF en el sitio web de la Autoridad (www.hsr.ca.gov), o se puede solicitar una copia electrónica llamando al (800) 435-8670.

El sitio web de la Autoridad también contiene el Borrador del EIR/EIS (publicado el 10 de julio de 2020, de conformidad con la CEQA y la NEPA), el Borrador revisado/suplementario del EIR/EIS (publicado el 23 de julio de 2021, de conformidad con la CEQA y la NEPA) y el Resumen Ejecutivo del EIR/EIS Final. El resumen ejecutivo está disponible en inglés, español, mandarín, vietnamita y tagalo.

Las copias impresas y/o electrónicas del EIR/EIS Final estarán disponibles en los siguientes lugares, durante el horario de atención de estos establecimientos (los días/horarios de atención pueden estar restringidos para cumplir con las directivas de salud pública y seguridad frente al coronavirus):

San Francisco—100 Larkin Street, San Francisco, CA 94102 (Biblioteca de San Francisco, sucursal principal) Brisbane—250 Visitacion Avenue, Brisbane, CA 94005 (Biblioteca de Brisbane) South San Francisco— 840 Orange Avenue, South San Francisco, CA 94080 (Biblioteca de South San Francisco) San Bruno—701 Angus Avenue West, San Bruno, CA 94066 (Biblioteca de San Bruno) Millbrae—1 Library Avenue, Millbrae, CA 94030 (Biblioteca de Millbrae) Burlingame—480 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA 94010 (Biblioteca de Burlingame) San Mateo— 55 West Third Avenue, San Mateo, CA 94402 (Biblioteca de San Mateo, sucursal principal) Belmont—1110 Alameda de las Pulgas, Belmont, CA 94002 (Biblioteca de Belmont) San Carlos—610 Elm Street, San Carlos, CA 94070 (Biblioteca de San Carlos) Redwood City—1044 Middlefield Road, Redwood City, CA 94063 (Biblioteca de Redwood City, sucursal del centro) Atherton—150 Watkins Avenue, Atherton, CA 94027 (Edificio del gobierno de la ciudad) Menlo Park—800 Alma Street, Menlo Park, CA 94025 (Biblioteca de Menlo Park) Palo Alto—270 Forest Avenue, Palo Alto, CA 94301 (Biblioteca de Palo Alto, sucursal del centro) Mountain View—585 Franklin Street, Mountain View, CA 94041 (Biblioteca de Mountain View) Sunnyvale— 665 Olive Avenue, Sunnyvale, CA 94086 (Biblioteca de Sunnyvale) Santa Clara—2635 Homestead Road, Santa Clara, CA 95051 (Sucursal Central Park, Biblioteca del condado de Santa Clara) San Jose—150 East San Fernando St., San Jose, CA 95112 (Biblioteca Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.)

Asimismo, están disponibles copias impresas y/o electrónicas del EIR/EIS Final para su revisión durante el horario de atención en la Oficina Regional del Norte de California de la Autoridad ubicada en 100 Paseo de San Antonio, Suite 300, San José, CA 95113 y en la sede de la Autoridad en 770 L Street, Suite 620, Sacramento, CA 95814. Comuníquese con la Autoridad en el (800) 435-8670 para concertar una cita para ver estos documentos. También puede solicitar una copia electrónica del EIR/EIS Final, del Borrador Revisado/Suplementario del EIR/EIS y del Borrador del EIR/EIS, así como de los informes técnicos asociados, llamando al (800) 435-8670 o enviando un correo electrónico a san.francisco_san.jose@hsr.ca.gov.

El EIR/EIS Final se pone a disposición del público y de los organismos públicos de conformidad con la Ley de Calidad Ambiental de California (CEQA) y la Ley Nacional de Política Ambiental (NEPA) antes de la toma de decisiones por parte de la Autoridad al concluir la revisión ambiental de este proyecto.

La revisión ambiental, la consulta y otras acciones requeridas por la NEPA y las leyes ambientales federales aplicables para este proyecto están siendo o han sido llevadas a cabo por el Estado de California de conformidad con el Artículo 327, Título 23 del Código de Estados Unidos y un Memorando de Entendimiento (MOU) de fecha 23 de julio de 2019 firmado por la Administración Federal de Ferrocarriles (FRA) y el Estado de California. En virtud de ese MOU, la Autoridad es el organismo principal del proyecto en el marco de la NEPA. Con anterioridad al MOU del 23 de julio de 2019, la FRA era el organismo federal principal. La Autoridad es también el organismo principal del proyecto conforme a la CEQA.

www.hsr.ca.gov

REUNIÓN DE LA JUNTA DIRECTIVA DE LA AUTORIDAD El 17 y 18 de agosto de 2022, a las 11:00 a. m.

ACTUALIZACIÓN POR COVID-19 Debido a razones de salud y seguridad pública en relación con el coronavirus, es posible que la reunión de la Junta Directiva de la Autoridad para tratar el EIR/EIS Final tenga lugar tanto en forma presencial como en línea y/o por video/teleconferencia.

Consulte el sitio web de la Autoridad (www.hsr.ca.gov) o llame al (800) 435-8670 para obtener más información, en particular información actualizada sobre la reunión prevista.

La Junta Directiva de la Autoridad celebrará una reunión de dos días, el 17 y 18 de agosto de 2022, para considerar si se certifica el EIR/EIS Final y se aprueba el tramo de la Alternativa Preferida hasta Scott Boulevard en Santa Clara (Alternativa A, con la modificación de estaciones de Caltrain para adaptarse al HSR en 4th y King Street y Millbrae, y un taller de mantenimiento ligero en East Brisbane) de conformidad con la CEQA. La Estación San Jose Diridon (incluido el tramo de la Alternativa Preferida desde Scott Boulevard en Santa Clara hasta West Alma Avenue en San José) ha sido aprobada por la Junta Directiva de la Autoridad como parte de la Sección del Proyecto de San José a Merced en abril de 2022, y por lo tanto no se propone su aprobación por parte de la Junta Directiva al considerar la Sección del Proyecto de San Francisco a San José. La Junta Directiva de la Autoridad, en su función de organismo principal en el marco de la NEPA, también considerará la posibilidad de ordenar al Director General de la Autoridad que emita un Registro de Decisión para la sección del proyecto de San Francisco a San José en el que se seleccione el tramo de la Alternativa Preferida hasta Scott Boulevard en Santa Clara. Los documentos y materiales que fundamentan las acciones propuestas por la Junta Directiva de la Autoridad estarán disponibles antes de la reunión en la página web de la Junta en https://hsr.ca.gov/about/board-of-directors/schedule/.

La Autoridad no discrimina por motivos de discapacidad y, previa solicitud, proporcionará ajustes razonables para garantizar la igualdad de acceso a sus programas, servicios y actividades. Las personas con discapacidades sensoriales pueden ponerse en contacto con la Autoridad por teléfono o a través del sitio web de la Autoridad para solicitar asistencia en materia de accesibilidad. Las instalaciones para reuniones son accesibles a las personas con discapacidad o que necesitan asistencia para participar. Para servicios de traducción o necesidades especiales, sírvase llamar al (800) 435-8670.

Si tiene preguntas o necesita ayuda para encontrar copias de los documentos, envíenos un correo electrónico a san.francisco_san.jose@hsr.ca.gov o llame a la oficina de la Autoridad del Tren de Alta Velocidad de California al (800) 435-8670.

To view this Notice of Availability (NOA) in English, visit the Authority’s website at: https://hsr. ca.gov/programs/environmental-planning/project-section-environmental-documents-tier-2/ san -francisco-to-san-jose-project-section-draft-environmental-impact-report-environmental-impact-statement/ 如要阅读本 NOA 的简体中文版，请访问高铁局网站：https://hsr.ca.gov/programs/environmental-planning/project-section-environmental-documents-tier-2/ san-francisco-to-san-jose-project-section-draft-environmental-impact-report-environmental-impact-statement/ Để xem NOA này bằng tiếng Việt, vui lòng truy cập trang web của Cơ quan: https://hsr.ca.gov/programs/environmental-planning/project-section-environmental-documents-tier-2/san-francisco-to-san-jose-project-section-draft-environmental-impact-report-environmental-impact-statement/ Upang matingnan ang NOA na ito sa Tagalog, pakibisita ang website ng Authority sa: https://hsr.ca.gov/programs/environmental-planning/project-section-environmental-documents-tier-2/san-francisco-to-san-jose-project-section-draft-environmental-impact-report-environmental-impact-statement/

san.francisco_san.jose@hsr.ca.gov

800-435-8670

JUN 03 - JUN 09, 2022

A BIG WEEK FOR OTTERS IN CALIFORNIA

T

GREEN LIVING

EL OBSERVADOR | www.el-observador.com

15

UNA GRAN SEMANA PARA LAS NUTRIAS EN CALIFORNIA

ENGLISH

ESPAÑOL

Suzanne Potter California News Service

Andy Johnson, representante de California de Defenders of Wildlife, dijo que solían vivir en toda la costa norte.

his week, in honor of World Otter Day, conservation groups are looking to raise awareness about efforts to restore sea otters along more areas of the California coast.

"En algún momento, nos gustaría mover algunas nutrias hacia el norte y llevarlas a aguas más frías, donde solían estar las nutrias marinas antes de que fueran cazadas hasta casi la extinción”, explicó Johnson. "Permítales tal vez ayudar a restaurar algunas de las algas marinas a lo largo de la costa norte y mejorar la biodiversidad de esos hábitats".

Right now, sea otter populations are mostly concentrated on the Central Coast, between Santa Barbara and an area just south of San Francisco, hemmed in by predatory white sharks.

El programa de subrogación del Acuario de la Bahía de Monterey ha reintroducido con éxito nutrias marinas en las cercanías de Elkhorn Slough.

Andy Johnson, California representative for Defenders of Wildlife, said they used to live all the way up the north coast.

"We'd like to, at some point, maybe shift some otters northward and get them into cooler waters, where sea otters used to be before they were hunted to near extinction," Johnson explained. "Let them maybe help restore some of the kelp along the north coast, and improve the biodiversity of those habitats."

The Monterey Bay Aquarium's surrogacy program has successfully reintroduced sea otters in nearby Elkhorn Slough.

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is due to release a report to Congress this summer on the feasibility of expanding the program.

Otters save kelp beds by eating sea urchins, which can devour the kelp if not kept in check.

Johnson noted the otter population has re-

There are more than a dozen species of otters around the world. Photo Credit: David Ledig / Bureau of Land Management

bounded over the past century, but has a long way to go to fully recover.

"We think that there were between 16,000 and 20,000 otters historically on the California coast," Johnson reported. "Right now, there are about 3,000 animals. There were only about maybe 50 otters back in the early 1900s."

This week, the California State Assembly also passed a resolution to proclaim the 20th annual Sea Otter Awareness Week, which takes place Sep. 18-24.

El Servicio de Pesca y Vida Silvestre de EE. UU. publicará un informe al Congreso este verano sobre la viabilidad de expandir el programa. Las nutrias salvan los lechos de algas al comer erizos de mar, que suelen devorar las algas si no se mantienen bajo control.

Suzanne Potter California News Service

Johnson señaló que la población de nutrias se ha recuperado durante el siglo pasado, pero tiene un largo camino por recorrer para recuperarse por completo.

sta semana, en honor al Día Mundial de la Nutria, los grupos conservacionistas buscan crear conciencia sobre los esfuerzos para restaurar las nutrias marinas en más áreas de la costa de California.

"Creemos que históricamente había entre 16.000 y 20.000 nutrias en la costa de California", informó Johnson. "En este momento, hay alrededor de 3.000 animales. Solo había unas 50 nutrias a principios de los años 1900".

En este momento, las poblaciones de nutrias marinas se concentran principalmente en la costa central, entre Santa Bárbara y un área justo al sur de San Francisco, cercada por tiburones blancos depredadores.

Esta semana, la Asamblea del Estado de California también aprobó una resolución para proclamar la vigésima semana anual de concientización sobre la nutria marina, que se llevará a cabo del 18 al 24 de septiembre.

E

Exclusivamente para visitantes de 50 años y mayores. ¡Estacionamiento gratuito y entrada gratuita!

El Parque y Zoológico Happy Hollow es un lugar para los jóvenes y para los jóvenes de espíritu. Para brindar un mejor servicio a los adultos mayores de nuestra comunidad, se invita a los visitantes de 50 años en adelante a conquistar el emblemático Parque y Zoológico Happy Hollow de San José y volver a sentirse como niños. Tome aire fresco y haga ejercicio mientras disfruta:

SENIOR SAFARI 2022

Presented by

• Entrada más temprana al parque y al zoológico • Conocer y saludar a los animales • Pláticas con los cuidadores del zoológico

• Reto de los 10,000 pasos • Variedad de actividades • Desayunos nutritivos a la venta

Eventos en 2022 • Los jueves, de 9 a 10 de la mañana 26 de mayo • 23 de junio • 28 de julio 25 de agosto • 22 de septiembre • 27 de octubre Los visitantes que entren antes de las 10 de la mañana podrán quedarse todo el día gratis.

Si desea obtener más información, visite happyhollow.org/seniorsafari o llame al 1-408-794-6400.

Gracias a nuestros patrocinadores de 2022:

Happy Hollow Park & Zoo 748 Story Road, San Jose, CA 95112

Presentamos a: Kaiser Permanente Plata: Massei Construction, San Jose Water, Santa Clara County Dept. of Aging and Adult Services, Stanford Healthcare, Swenson Bronce: AARP California, Health Trust, Republic Urban Properties, Santa Clara Family Health Plan, Tech CU, Woodmont Real Estate Services

16

JOBS / CLASSIFIEDS / LEGALS

EL OBSERVADOR | www.el-observador.com

Affordable Housing units at Montevista Apartments in Milpitas are now available for rent - Apply Now! Currently available 1- and 2-bdr apartments; rents from $1,958 to $2,191. This 306-unit community in Milpitas is accepting pre-applications for its below-market-rate waiting list. Beautiful community with swimming pool, BBQ and picnic area, and much more. Minimum income is 2x rent, maximum income applies - contact property for more information.

Applications are available via 1) https://bridgehousing.com/properties/ montevista/ or 2) calling (408) 942-8829. Please note other unit types/rent levels may be available. For more information please call the number listed above.

1001 S. Main St in Milpitas, CA. Call for more info Mon-Thurs 9AM-7PM, Fri 9AM- 5PM, Saturday 9AM-2PM. Income and other restrictions apply. Section 8 welcome. EHO.

Automation Lead; Mountain View, CA; 1 Pos; Design & dev of Automa FW proj & regres test case automa, Design & execu using contin test pipeline. Req: Bachelor deg (or foreign equal) in Comp Electro, Comp Applic or rel & 4 yrs of exp in IT. Alt: Master deg (or foreign equal) in Comp, Electro, CompAppli or rel & 2 yrs exp in IT. Visual Stu, Java Dev Kit, C#, Java, Coded UI, Selenium, SoapUI, Rest Assured, Cucumber, Agile Method, MS Azure & AWS. Send CV’s Harman Connected Services C/O Mahesh, Job ID-AL-HCS-M-01, 2002, 156 Ave, NE #200, Bellevue, WA 98007.

FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT NO. 685651 The following person(s) is (are) doing business as: THE BIG THREE, 734 Lakewood Dr., Sunnyvale, CA 94089, Santa Clara County.

This business is individual. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are): Miguel Angel Reategui Lopez, 734 Lakewood Dr., Sunnyvale, CA 94089. The registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed above on 5/31/2022.

This filing is a first filing. “I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.) /s/ Miguel A. Reategui Lopez This statement was filed with the Co. ClerkRecorder of Santa Clara County on 06/01/2022.

Regina Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder By: /s/ Nina Khamphilath, Deputy

File No. FBN 685651 June 3, 10, 17, 24, 2022 FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT NO. 685515 The following person(s) is (are) doing business as: Alma Family Day Care Inc, 1544 Mount Pleasant Dr, San Jose, CA 95127, Santa Clara County. This business is owned by a Corporation. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are): Alma Family Day Care Inc, 1544 Mount Pleasant Dr, San Jose, CA 95127. The registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed above on 11/14/2016. This filing is a first filing. “I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.) /s/ Alma D. Rios Alma Family Day Care Inc. President Article/Reg#: 3963341 Above entity was

formed in the state of CA This statement was filed with the Co. ClerkRecorder of Santa Clara County on 05/24/2022.

Regina Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder By: /s/ Elaine Fader, Deputy File No. FBN 685515 June 3, 10, 17, 24, 2022 FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT NO. 685607 The following person(s) is (are) doing business as: Sivan Aquatics Sports, 4625 Williams Rd, San Jose, CA 95129, Santa Clara County. This business is owned by a Married Couple. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are): Mehdi Asghari, 4625 Williams Rd, San Jose, CA 95129 and Solmaz Abrar, 4625 Williams Rd, San Jose, CA 95129. The registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed above on 05/27/2022. This filing is a first filing. “I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.) /s/ Mehdi Asghari This statement was filed with the Co. ClerkRecorder of Santa Clara County on 05/27/2022.

Regina Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder By: /s/ Sandy Chanthasy, Deputy File No. FBN 685607 June 3, 10, 17, 24, 2022 FICTITIOUS

BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT NO. 685552 The following person(s) is (are) doing business as: Fume Day Preppers, 108 Sierra Mesa Dr, San Jose, CA 95116, Santa Clara County.

This business is owned by an Individual. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are): Dean Michael Del Rosario Cautivo, 108 Sierra Mesa Dr, San Jose, CA 95116. The registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed above on N/A. This filing is a first filing. “I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.) /s/ Dean Michael Del Rosario Cautivo This statement was filed with the Co. ClerkRecorder of Santa Clara County on 05/26/2022.

Regina Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder By: /s/ Sandy Chanthasy, Deputy File No. FBN 685552 June 3, 10, 17, 24, 2022 FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT NO. 685629 The following person(s) is (are) doing business as: THIEN TRUC, 2396 Senter Rd, San Jose, CA 95112, Santa Clara County. This business is owned by an Individual. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are): Hoa Duc Luu, 2490 Kenoga Dr, San Jose, CA 95121. The

registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed above on 01/10/2011. This filing is a refile [Change(s) in facts from previous filing] of previous file #: FBN614517. “I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.) /s/ Hoa Duc Luu This statement was filed with the Co. ClerkRecorder of Santa Clara County on 05/31/2022.

Regina Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder By: /s/ Patty Camarena, Deputy File No. FBN 685629 June 3, 10, 17, 24, 2022 FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT NO. 685622 The following person(s) is (are) doing business as: MOE’S GARAGE, 5258 Westmont Ave, San Jose, CA 95130, Santa Clara County.

This business is owned by an Individual. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are): MAURICIO GONZALEZ-HERNANDEZ, 5258 Westmont Ave, San Jose, CA 95130.

The registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed above on N/A. This filing is a first filing. “I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.) /s/ MAURICIO GONZALES-HERNANDEZ This statement was filed with the Co. ClerkRecorder of Santa Clara County on 05/31/2022.

Regina Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder By: /s/ Nina Khamphilath, Deputy File No. FBN 685622 June 3, 10, 17, 24, 2022 FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT NO. 685126 The following person(s) is (are) doing business as: UDEC DESIGN, 2350 Senter #318, San Jose,

CA 95112, Santa Clara County. This business is owned by a Limited Liability Company. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are): UDEC DESIGN, 25714 Westview Way, Hayward, CA 94542.

The registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed above on 05/12/2022.

This filing is a first filing. “I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.) /s/ Linh Nguyen UDEC DESIGN CEO Article/Reg#: 202250310498 Above entity was formed in the state of CA This statement was filed with the Co. ClerkRecorder of Santa Clara County on 05/12/2022.

Regina Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder By: /s/ Sandy Chanthasy, Deputy File No. FBN 685126 June 3, 10, 17, 24, 2022 FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT NO. 685567 The following person(s) is (are) doing business as: LA SUPERIOR TAQUERIA, 1098 Leigh Avenue, San Jose, CA 95126, Santa Clara County. This business is owned by a Limited Liability Company. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are): LA SUPERIOR TAQUERIA LLC, 1098 Leigh Avenue, San Jose, CA 95126. The registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed above on 5/21/2022. This filing is a first filing. “I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.) /s/ Maria Socorro Ramos Sandoval LA SUPERIOR TAQUERIA LLC Manager Article/Reg#: 202250116615 Above entity was

JUN 03 - JUN 09, 2022 formed in the state of CA This statement was filed with the Co. ClerkRecorder of Santa Clara County on 05/27/2022.

Regina Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder By: /s/ Sandy Chanthasy, Deputy File No. FBN 685567 June 3, 10, 17, 24, 2022 FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT NO. 685593 The following person(s) is (are) doing business as: MR. M HANDYMAN, 2421 Clyda Dr, San Jose, CA 95116, Santa Clara County.

This business is owned by an Individual. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are): Hector Moreno, 2421 Clyda Dr, San Jose, CA 95116. The registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed above on N/A. This filing is a first filing. “I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.) /s/ Hector Moreno This statement was filed with the Co. ClerkRecorder of Santa Clara County on 05/27/2022.

Regina Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder By: /s/ Sandy Chanthasy, Deputy File No. FBN 685593 June 3, 10, 17, 24, 2022 FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT NO. 685594 The following person(s) is (are) doing business as: E.M. HANDYMAN, 2156 Tasman Dr #233, Santa Clara, CA 95054, Santa Clara County.

This business is owned by an Individual. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are): ERNEST DANIEL MORENO, 2156 Tasman Dr #233, Santa Clara, CA 95054. The registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed above on N/A. This filing is a first filing. “I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true

information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.) /s/ Ernest Daniel Moreno This statement was filed with the Co. ClerkRecorder of Santa Clara County on 05/27/2022.

Regina Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder By: /s/ Elaine Fader, Deputy File No. FBN 685594 June 3, 10, 17, 24, 2022 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME NO. 22CV398515 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara-In the matter of the application of: ANGELINA EILIE ANDREI. TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS: 1. Petitioner(s) Angelina Eilie Andrei, aka: Lina Eilia Serhan, aka: Lina Eilia has filed a petition for Change of Name with the clerk of this court for a decree changing names as follows: a.

Angelina Eilie Andrei AKA Lina Eilia Serhan AKA Lina Eilia to ELENA AURELINE CIRIACKS ELIA 2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted. Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file written objection that includes the reasons for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing. NOTICE OF HEARING: Date: 07/05/2022 at 8:45 am, Probate Dept., located at 191 N. First Street, San Jose, CA 95113. 3. A copy of the Order to Show cause shall be published at least once a week for four successive weeks prior to the date set for hearing on the petition in El Observador, a newspaper of general circulation, printed in the county of Santa Clara.

May 23, 2022 Jacqueline M. Arroyo

JUN 03 - JUN 09, 2022 Judge of the Superior Court June 3, 10, 17, 24, 2022 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME NO. 22CV397299 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara-In the matter of the application of: Heejeong Lim. TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS: 1. Petitioner(s) Heejeong Lim has filed a petition for Change of Name with the clerk of this court for a decree changing names as follows: a. Heejeong Lim to Janice Heejeong Lim 2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted.

Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file written objection that includes the reasons for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing. NOTICE OF HEARING: Date: 08/02/2022 at 8:45 am, Probate Dept., located at 191 N. First Street, San Jose, CA 95113. 3. A copy of the Order to Show cause shall be published at least once a week for four successive weeks prior to the date set for hearing on the petition in El Observador, a newspaper of general circulation, printed in the county of Santa Clara.

Apr 26, 2022 Jacqueline M. Arroyo Judge of the Superior Court June 3, 10, 17, 24, 2022 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME NO. 22CV398233 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara-In the matter of the application of: Hongvilay Thongsamouth & Wasan Romsaitong.

TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS: 1.

Petitioner(s) Hongvilay Thongsamouth & Wasan Romsaitong have filed a petition for Change of Name with the clerk of this court for a decree changing names as follows: a.

Pitisak Romsaitong to Pete Romsaitong b.

Piboon Romsaitong to Ben Romsaitong 2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted.

Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file written objection that includes the reasons for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing. NOTICE OF HEARING: Date: 09/06/2022 at 8:45 am, Probate Dept., located at 191 N. First Street, San Jose, CA 95113. 3. A copy of the Order to Show cause shall be published at least once a week for four successive weeks prior to the date set for hearing on the petition in El Observador, a newspaper of general circulation, printed in the county of Santa Clara.

May 18, 2022 Jacqueline M. Arroyo Judge of the Superior Court June 3, 10, 17, 24, 2022 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME NO. 22CV398589 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara-In the matter of the application of: Samuel L. Dennis (as conservator). TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS: 1. Petitioner(s) Samuel L. Dennis (as conservator) has filed a petition for Change of Name with the clerk of this court for a decree changing names as follows: a.

Megan Dennis Massa to

EL OBSERVADOR | www.el-observador.com Megan Jennifer Dennis 2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted.

Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file written objection that includes the reasons for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing. NOTICE OF HEARING: Date: 09/13/2022 at 8:45 am, Probate Dept., located at 191 N. First Street, San Jose, CA 95113. 3. A copy of the Order to Show cause shall be published at least once a week for four successive weeks prior to the date set for hearing on the petition in El Observador, a newspaper of general circulation, printed in the county of Santa Clara.

May 25, 2022 Jacqueline M. Arroyo Judge of the Superior Court June 3, 10, 17, 24, 2022 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME NO. 22CV398664 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara-In the matter of the application of: Bharath Pattabiraman and Yanfei Tu. TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS: 1. Petitioner(s) Bharath Pattabiraman and Yanfei Tu have filed a petition for Change of Name with the clerk of this court for a decree changing names as follows: a. Ananya Shibei Tu to Ananya Shibei Bharath-Tu 2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted.

Any person objecting to the name changes described above must

file written objection that includes the reasons for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing. NOTICE OF HEARING: Date: 09/20/2022 at 8:45 am, Probate Dept., located at 191 N. First Street, San Jose, CA 95113. 3. A copy of the Order to Show cause shall be published at least once a week for four successive weeks prior to the date set for hearing on the petition in El Observador, a newspaper of general circulation, printed in the county of Santa Clara.

May 27, 2022 Jacqueline M. Arroyo Judge of the Superior Court June 3, 10, 17, 24, 2022 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME NO. 22CV398588 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara-In the matter of the application of: Zalan Bujtas and Erika Bujtas. TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS: 1. Petitioner(s) Zalan Bujtas and Erika Bujtas have filed a petition for Change of Name with the clerk of this court for a decree changing names as follows: a.

Zalan Bujtas to Alan Baradlay. b. Erika Bujtas to Madeline Baradlay. c. Anne Mave Bujtas to Annie Mave Baradlay. d.

Daniel Merric Bujtas to Daniel Merric Baradlay.

2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted.

Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file written objection that includes the reasons for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be

JOBS / CLASSIFIEDS / LEGALS

17

¡Almaden Lake Apartments, una comunidad asequible de 144 unidades en San José cerrará su lista de espera el 10 de junio de 2022!

Esta propiedad ofrece departamentos asequibles de 1, 2 y 3 recámaras con rentas desde $1,096-$1,505 por mes. Las solicitudes previas para la lista de espera se aceptarán hasta el viernes 10 de junio de 2022 a las 5 p.m. por 1) Llamada al (408) 323-8020 o 2) Recogida sin contacto en la propiedad, o 3) En http://bridgehousing.com/properties/ almaden-lake/. La oficina está ubicada en 978 Almaden Lake Dr. en San José. El horario de oficina es de lunes a jueves de 9 AM 5 PM. Las comodidades incluyen sala comunitaria con cocina, instalaciones de lavandería, alberca y áreas de juego al aire libre. Para más información llámenos al (408) 323-8020. Se aplican restricciones de ingresos y otras. Sección-8 bienvenida. EHO.

granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing. NOTICE OF HEARING: Date: 09/13/2022 at 8:45 am, Probate Dept., located at 191 N. First Street, San Jose, CA 95113. 3. A copy of the Order to Show cause shall be published at least once a week for four successive weeks prior to the date set for hearing on the petition in El Observador, a newspaper of general circulation, printed in the county of Santa Clara.

May 25, 2022 Jacqueline M. Arroyo Judge of the Superior Court June, 3, 10, 17 and 24, 2022 Notice of Petition to Administer Estate of Chandur Khemchand Tharani aka Chander Tharani Case No. 22PR192396 1.To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may be interested in the will or estate, or both, of Chandur Khemchand Tharani aka Chander Tharani. 2. A Petition for Probate has been filed

by SHABEEN THARANI in the Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara. 3.The Petition for Probate requests that SHABEEN THARANI be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent.

5. The petition requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administer of Estate Act. (This

authority will allow the personal representative to take any actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the personal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consent to the proposed action.) The independent administration authority will be granted unless an interested person Files and objection to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority. 6. A hearing on the petition will be held in this court as follows: June 24, 2022, at 9:01am, Dept. 13, located at 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113. 7. If you object to the granting of this petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney. 8. If you are a creditor or contingent creditor of the decedent, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal representative appointed by the court within the later of either: 1) four months from the date of first issuance of letters to a general personal representative as defined in section 58(b) of the California Probate Code, or 2) 60 days from the date of mailing or personal delivery to you of a notice under section 9052 of the California Probate Code. Other California statutes and legal authority may

affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in California law. 9. You may examine the file kept by the court. If you are a person interested in the estate, you may file with the court a Request for Special Notice (form DE-154) of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition or account as provided in Probate Code section 1250. A Request for Special Notice form is available from the court clerk.

10. Attorney for Petitioner: Huma J. Ellahie 2542 S. Bascom Ave., STE 235 Campbell, CA 95008 (408)579-1282 Run Date: June 3, 10 and 17, 2022 Notice of Petition to Administer Estate of Abereton Tamuno Dikibo Case No. 22PR191890 1.To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may be interested in the will or estate, or both, of Abereton Tamuno Dikibo. 2. A Petition for Probate has been filed

by LINDA DIKIBO in the Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara. 3.The Petition for Probate requests that LINDA DIKIBO be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent. 5. The petition requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administer of Estate Act. (This authority will allow

the personal representative to take any actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the personal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consent to the proposed action.) The independent administration authority will be granted unless an interested person Files and objection to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority. 6. A hearing on the petition will be held in this court as follows: June 20, 2022, at 9:01am, Dept. 13, located at 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113. 7. If you object to the granting of this petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney. 8. If you are a creditor or contingent creditor of the decedent, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal representative appointed by the court within the later of either: 1) four months from the date of first issuance of letters to a general personal representative as defined in section 58(b) of the California Probate Code, or 2) 60 days from the date of mailing or personal delivery to you of a notice under section 9052 of the California Probate Code. Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a

18

CLASSIFIEDS / LEGALS

creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in California law. 9. You may examine the file kept by the court. If you are a person interested in the estate, you may file with the court a Request for Special Notice (form DE-154) of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition or account as provided in Probate Code section 1250. A Request for Special Notice form is available from the court clerk.

10. Attorney for Petitioner: Himat Singh Bainiwal 2797 Park Avenue, Suite 201 Santa Clara, CA 95050 (408)646-1661 Run Date: June 3, 10 and 17, 2022 FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT NO. 684893 The following person(s) is (are) doing business as: Bussines Homes Remodeling, 2784 Homestead Rd #355, Santa Clara, CA 95051, Santa Clara County.

This business is owned by an Individual. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are): Elin Eduardo Ucelo, 1368 Chertsey Ct, San Jose, CA 95051.

The registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed above on 5/05/2022.

This filing is a first filing. “I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.) /s/ Elin Eduardo Ucelo This statement was filed with the Co. ClerkRecorder of Santa Clara County on 05/05/2022.

Regina Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder By: /s/ Sandy Chanthasy, Deputy File No. FBN 684893 May 27, June, 3, 10, 17, 2022 FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT NO. 685087 The following person(s) is (are) doing busi-

ness as: SOMCARE SERVICE LLC, 333 West San Carlos Street Suite 600, San Jose, CA 95110, Santa Clara County. This business is owned by a Limited Liability Company. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are): SOMCARE SERVICE LLC, 1060 Ranchero Way Apt 6, San Jose, CA 95117. The registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed above on 5/12/2022. This filing is a first filing. “I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.) /s/ Haid Ibrahim SOMCARE SERVICE LLC Owner Article/Reg#: 202250416121 Above entity was formed in the state of CA This statement was filed with the Co. ClerkRecorder of Santa Clara County on 05/12/2022.

Regina Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder By: /s/ Sandy Chanthasy, Deputy File No. FBN 685087 May 27, June, 3, 10, 17, 2022 FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT NO. 685292 The following person(s) is (are) doing business as: EARTH CHILD AQUAPONICS, 15555 El Gato Ln, Los Gatos, CA 95032, Santa Clara County. This business is owned by a Limited Liability Company. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are): CONNECT THROUGH SPORTS LLC, 15555 El Gato Lane, Los Gatos, CA 95032.

The registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed above on N/A. This filing is a first filing. “I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.) /s/ Henrik Hoyer CONNECT THROUGH

EL OBSERVADOR | www.el-observador.com SPORTS LLC Member Article/Reg#: 201705410197 Above entity was formed in the state of CA This statement was filed with the Co. ClerkRecorder of Santa Clara County on 05/17/2022.

Regina Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder By: /s/ Elaine Fader, Deputy File No. FBN 685292 May 27, June, 3, 10, 17, 2022 FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT NO. 685419 The following person(s) is (are) doing business as: Bernabe Reglaze, 1511 Chabot Way, San Jose, CA 95122, Santa Clara County. This business is owned by an Individual. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are): Iran Bernabe Hernandez, 1511 Chabot Way, San Jose, CA 95122. The registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed above on 5/19/2022.

This filing is a first filing. “I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.) /s/ Iran Bernabe Hernandez This statement was filed with the Co. ClerkRecorder of Santa Clara County on 05/19/2022.

Regina Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder By: /s/ Patty Camarena, Deputy File No. FBN 685419 May 27, June, 3, 10, 17, 2022 FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT NO. 684486 The following person(s) is (are) doing business as: MACIEL PROFESSIONAL LANDSCAPING, 2495 Clyda Dr, Santa Jose, CA 95116, Santa Clara County.

This business is owned by an Individual. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are): Genaro Maciel, 2495 Clyda Dr, San Jose,

CA 95116. The registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed above on N/A. This filing is a first filing. “I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.) /s/ Genaro Maciel Owner This statement was filed with the Co. ClerkRecorder of Santa Clara County on 04/22/2022.

Regina Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder By: /s/ Sandy Chanthasy, Deputy File No. FBN 684486 May 27, June, 3, 10, 17, 2022 STATEMENT OF ABANDONMENT OF USE OF FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME The following person(s) has / have abandoned the use of the fictitious business name(s): L&L WATER N THINGS, 1307 Jacklin Rd, Milpitas CA, 95035. Filed in Santa Clara County on 06/07/19 under file no. FBN655611. DUC LE, 1061 Colette Dr, San Jose CA, 95132.

This business was conducted by: An Individual.

“I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.) /s/ Duc Le, Owner This statement was filed with the Co. Clerk Recorder of Santa Clara County on 5/23/2022.

Regina Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder By: /s/ Elaine Fader, Deputy File No. FBN 685472 May 27, June, 3, 10, 17, 2022 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME NO. 22CV398234 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara-In the matter of the application of: Phuong Thi My Mai TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS: 1. Petitioner(s) Phuong Thi My Mai has filed a petition for Change of Name with the clerk of

this court for a decree changing names as follows: a. Phuong Thi My Mai to My Phuong Thi Mai 2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted.

Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file written objection that includes the reasons for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing. NOTICE OF HEARING: Date: 09/06/2022 at 8:45 am, Probate Dept., located at 191 N. First Street, San Jose, CA 95113. 3. A copy of the Order to Show cause shall be published at least once a week for four successive weeks prior to the date set for hearing on the petition in El Observador, a newspaper of general circulation, printed in the county of Santa Clara.

May 18, 2022 Jacqueline M.Arroyo Judge of the Superior Court May 27, June, 3, 10, 17, 2022 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME NO. 22CV395983 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara-In the matter of the application of: Fiama Oviedo & Ricardo Espinoza TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS: 1. Petitioner(s) Fiama Oviedo & Ricardo Espinoza has filed a petition for Change of Name with the clerk of this court for a decree changing names as follows: a. Kaique M Oviedo to Kaique M Espinoza-Oviedo b.

Kairo N Oviedo to Kairo N Espinoza-Oviedo c.

Fiama Oviedo Artadi to Fiamma Oviedo Artadi 2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter appear before this court

at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted.

Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file written objection that includes the reasons for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing. NOTICE OF HEARING: Date: 06/28/2022 at 8:45 am, Probate Dept., located at 191 N. First Street, San Jose, CA 95113. 3. A copy of the Order to Show cause shall be published at least once a week for four successive weeks prior to the date set for hearing on the petition in El Observador, a newspaper of general circulation, printed in the county of Santa Clara.

May 16, 2022 Jacqueline M. Arroyo Judge of the Superior Court May 27, June, 3, 10, 17, 2022 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME NO. 22CV398346 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara-In the matter of the application of: Roya Nusheen Mason and Kyle Lokken Henderson TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS: 1. Petitioner(s) Roya Nusheen Mason and Kyle Lokken Henderson has filed a petition for Change of Name with the clerk of this court for a decree changing names as follows: a.

Roya Nusheen Mason to Roya Nusheen Henlodison b. Kyle Lokken Henderson to Kyle Lokken Henlodison 2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted.

Any person objecting to the name changes described above must

JUN 03 - JUN 09, 2022 file written objection that includes the reasons for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing. NOTICE OF HEARING: Date: 09/06/2022 at 8:45 am, Probate Dept., located at 191 N. First Street, San Jose, CA 95113. 3. A copy of the Order to Show cause shall be published at least once a week for four successive weeks prior to the date set for hearing on the petition in El Observador, a newspaper of general circulation, printed in the county of Santa Clara.

May 20, 2022 Jacqueline M. Arroyo Judge of the Superior Court May 27, June, 3, 10, 17, 2022 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME NO. 22CV398507 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara-In the matter of the application of: Michael Edward Foronda Adviento TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS: 1. Petitioner(s) Michael Edward Foronda Adviento has filed a petition for Change of Name with the clerk of this court for a decree changing names as follows: a. Michael Edward Foronda Adviento to Michael Edward Foronda Williams 2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted. Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file written objection that includes the reasons for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed,

the court may grant the petition without a hearing. NOTICE OF HEARING: Date: 09/06/2022 at 8:45 am, Probate Dept., located at 191 N. First Street, San Jose, CA 95113. 3. A copy of the Order to Show cause shall be published at least once a week for four successive weeks prior to the date set for hearing on the petition in El Observador, a newspaper of general circulation, printed in the county of Santa Clara.

May 23, 2022 Jacqueline M. Arroyo Judge of the Superior Court May 27, June, 3, 10, 17, 2022 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME NO. 22CV397358 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara-In the matter of the application of: Ciria Roxana Rodriguez & Melchor David Turcios Martinez TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS: 1. Petitioner(s) Ciria Roxana Rodriguez & Melchor David Turcios Martinez has filed a petition for Change of Name with the clerk of this court for a decree changing names as follows: a. Ian David Rodriguez to Ian David Turcios Rodriguez 2.

THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted.

Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file written objection that includes the reasons for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing. NOTICE OF HEARING: Date: 08/09/2022 at 8:45 am, Probate Dept., located at 191 N. First Street, San Jose, CA 95113. 3. A copy of the Order to Show

JUN 03 - JUN 09, 2022 cause shall be published at least once a week for four successive weeks prior to the date set for hearing on the petition in El Observador, a newspaper of general circulation, printed in the county of Santa Clara.

April 28, 2022 Julie M. Emede Judge of the Superior Court May 27, June, 3, 10, 17, 2022 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME NO. 22CV397299 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara-In the matter of the application of: Heejeong Lim TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS: 1. Petitioner(s) Heejeong Lim has filed a petition for Change of Name with the clerk of this court for a decree changing names as follows: a. Heejeong Lim to Janice Heejeong Lim 2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted.

Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file written objection that includes the reasons for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing. NOTICE OF HEARING: Date: 08/02/2022 at 8:45 am, Probate Dept., located at 191 N. First Street, San Jose, CA 95113. 3. A copy of the Order to Show cause shall be published at least once a week for four successive weeks prior to the date set for hearing on the petition in El Observador, a newspaper of general circulation, printed in the county of Santa Clara.

Apr 26, 2022 Jacqueline M. Arroyo Judge of the Superior Court May 27, June, 3, 10, 17,

2022 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME NO. 22CV397186 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara-In the matter of the application of: Elisha Maria Macias TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS: 1. Petitioner(s) Elisha Maria Macias has filed a petition for Change of Name with the clerk of this court for a decree changing names as follows: a.

Elisha Maria Macias to Alicia Maria Macias.

2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted.

Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file written objection that includes the reasons for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing. NOTICE OF HEARING: Date: 08/02/2022 at 8:45 am, Probate Dept., located at 191 N. First Street, San Jose, CA 95113. 3. A copy of the Order to Show cause shall be published at least once a week for four successive weeks prior to the date set for hearing on the petition in El Observador, a newspaper of general circulation, printed in the county of Santa Clara.

Apr 22, 2022 Jacqueline M. Arroyo Judge of the Superior Court May 27, June, 3, 10, 17, 2022 NOTICE OF DEATH OF JOHN DAVID ROGERS To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the will or estate, or both of John David Rogers, who was a resident of Santa Clara County, State of Califor-

EL OBSERVADOR | www.el-observador.com nia, and died on March 30, 2022, in the City of Sunnyvale, County of Santa Clara, State of California.

IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a contingent creditor of the deceased, you must file your claim within four months from the date of first publication with the DERMER LAW FIRM, 15720 Winchester Boulevard, Suite 200, Los Gatos, California 95030 (408) 395-5111 Joseph D. Dermer, Esq. DERMER LAW FIRM 15720 Winchester Blvd., Ste 200 Los Gatos, CA 95030 Tel (408) 395-5111 Fax (408) 354-2797 May 27, June, 3, 10, 17, 2022 Notice of Petition to Administer Estate of JOHN STEVE ADLER Case No. 22PR192165 1.To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may be interested in the will or estate, or both, of JOHN ADLER, STEVE ADLER. 2. A Petition for Probate has been filed

by DARIN ADLER in the Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara. 3.The Petition for Probate requests that DARIN ADLER be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent. 4. The petition requests the decedent’s will and codicils, if any, be admitted to probate.

The will and any codicils are available for examination in the file kept by the court. 5. The petition requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administer of Estate Act. (This authority will allow the personal representative to take any actions without obtaining court approval.

Before taking certain very important actions, however, the personal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consent to the proposed action.) The independent administration authority will be granted unless an interested person Files and objection to the petition

and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority. 6. A hearing on the petition will be held in this court as follows: June 23, 2022, at 9:01am, Dept. 5, located at 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113. 7. If you object to the granting of this petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney. 8.

If you are a creditor or contingent creditor of the decedent, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal representative appointed by the court within the later of either: 1) four months from the date of first issuance of letters to a general personal representative as defined in section 58(b) of the California Probate Code, or 2) 60 days from the date of mailing or personal delivery to you of a notice under section 9052 of the California Probate Code. Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in California law. 9. You may examine the file kept by the court. If you are a person interested in the estate, you may file with the court a Request for Special Notice (form DE-154) of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition or account as provided in Probate Code section 1250. A Request for Special Notice form is available from the court clerk.

10. Attorney for Petitioner: Robert P. Bergman 3535 Ross Avenue, Ste. 308 San Jose CA, 95124 (408)247-0444 Rune Date: May 27, June, 3, 10, 2022 FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT NO. 685337 The following person(s) is (are) doing business as: A TIME 4 ROMANCE, 2145 Scott St., Suite 3, San Jose,

CA 95128, Santa Clara County. This business is owned by a General Partnership. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are): Anntonette Flowers, 2145 Scott St., #3, San Jose, CA 95128 and Norma Burns, 2811 McKee Rd. #117, San Jose, CA 95127. The registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed above on N/A. This filing is a first filing. “I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.) /s/ Norma Burns This statement was filed with the Co. ClerkRecorder of Santa Clara County on 05/18/2022.

Regina Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder By: /s/ Elaine Fader, Deputy File No. FBN 685337 May 20, 27, June, 3, 10, 2022 FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT NO. 685082 The following person(s) is (are) doing business as: N & I. FELIX GENERAL CO. REMODELING, 2487 Monterey Hwy #57, San Jose, CA 95111, Santa Clara County.

This business is owned by an Individual. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are): Gerardo Felix, Rojas, 2487 Monterey Hwy #57, San Jose, CA 95111. The registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed above on 5/11/2022. This filing is a first filing. “I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.) /s/ Gerardo Felix Rojas This statement was filed with the Co. ClerkRecorder of Santa Clara County on 05/12/2022.

Regina Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder By: /s/ Nina Khamphilath, Deputy File No. FBN 685082 May 20, 27, June, 3, 10, 2022

FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT NO. 685005 The following person(s) is (are) doing business as: HEAVEN JANITORIAL SERVICES, 1200 Ranchero Way Suite 85, San Jose, CA 95117, Santa Clara County.

This business is owned by an Individual. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are): Stefany S Gavia, 1200 Ranchero Way Suite 85, San Jose, CA 95117. The registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed above on 5/09/2022.

This filing is a first filing. “I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.) /s/ Stefany S. Gavia This statement was filed with the Co. ClerkRecorder of Santa Clara County on 05/10/2022.

Regina Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder By: /s/ Nina Khamphilath, Deputy File No. FBN 685005 May 20, 27, June, 3, 10, 2022 FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT NO. 685266 The following person(s) is (are) doing business as: Little Wonders Daycare, 1133 Lexington Drive, Sunnyvale, CA 94087, Santa Clara County. This business is owned by an Individual. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are): Claudia Marcela Parra, 1133 Lexington Drive, Sunnyvale, CA 94087.

The registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed above on 5/17/2022.

This filing is a first filing. “I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.) /s/ Claudia Marcela Parra This statement was

CLASSIFIEDS / LEGALS filed with the Co. ClerkRecorder of Santa Clara County on 05/17/2022.

Regina Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder By: /s/ Nina Khamphilath, Deputy File No. FBN 685266 May 20, 27, June, 3, 10, 2022 FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT NO. 685028 The following person(s) is (are) doing business as: AM CONSTRUCTION, 506 Capital Village Cir, San Jose, CA 95136, Santa Clara County.

This business is owned by an Individual. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are): Adrian Salgado Maceda, 506 Capital Village Cir, San Jose, CA 95136. The registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed above on N/A. This filing is a first filing. “I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.) /s/ Adrian Salgado Maceda This statement was filed with the Co. ClerkRecorder of Santa Clara County on 05/11/2022.

Regina Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder By: /s/ Nina Khamphilath, Deputy File No. FBN 685028 May 20, 27, June, 3, 10, 2022 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME NO. 22CV397188 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara-In the matter of the application of: Dan Thanh Thi Truong. TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS: 1. Petitioner(s) Dan Thanh Thi Truong has filed a petition for Change of Name with the clerk of this court for a decree changing names as follows: a. Dan Thanh Thi Truong to Dani Thanh Thi Nguyen 2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause,

19

if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted.

Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file written objection that includes the reasons for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing. NOTICE OF HEARING: Date: 07/26/2022 at 8:45 am, Probate Dept., located at 191 N. First Street, San Jose, CA 95113. 3. A copy of the Order to Show cause shall be published at least once a week for four successive weeks prior to the date set for hearing on the petition in El Observador, a newspaper of general circulation, printed in the county of Santa Clara.

Apr 22, 2022 Jacqueline M. Arroyo Judge of the Superior Court May 20, 27, June, 3, 10, 2022 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME NO. 22CV396570 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara-In the matter of the application of: ARSHDEEP SINGH, RAVINA RAJ PATEL. TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS: 1. Petitioner(s) ARSHDEEP SINGH, RAVINA RAJ PATEL have filed a petition for Change of Name with the clerk of this court for a decree changing names as follows: a.

ARSHDEEP SINGH to ARSHDEEP SINGH KALHER b. RAVINA RAJ PATEL to RAVINA PATEL KAUR KALHER 2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted. Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file written objection that includes the reasons for the objection at least

20

CLASSIFIEDS / LEGALS

two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing. NOTICE OF HEARING: Date: 07/12/2022 at 8:45 am, Probate Dept., located at 191 N. First Street, San Jose, CA 95113. 3. A copy of the Order to Show cause shall be published at least once a week for four successive weeks prior to the date set for hearing on the petition in El Observador, a newspaper of general circulation, printed in the county of Santa Clara.

Apr 08, 2022 Jacqueline M. Arroyo Judge of the Superior Court May 20, 27, June, 3, 10, 2022 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME NO. 22CV396739 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara-In the matter of the application of: Roderic Rory Tolentino Pettigrew. TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS: 1. Petitioner(s) Roderic Rory Tolentino Pettigrew has filed a petition for Change of Name with the clerk of this court for a decree changing names as follows: a.

Roderic Rory Tolentino Pettigrew to Rory Tolentino Pettigrew 2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted.

Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file written objection that includes the reasons for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hear-

ing. NOTICE OF HEARING: Date: 07/19/2022 at 8:45 am, Probate Dept., located at 191 N. First Street, San Jose, CA 95113. 3. A copy of the Order to Show cause shall be published at least once a week for four successive weeks prior to the date set for hearing on the petition in El Observador, a newspaper of general circulation, printed in the county of Santa Clara.

Apr 11, 2022 Jacqueline M. Arroyo Judge of the Superior Court May 20, 27, June, 3, 10, 2022 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME NO. 22CV397194 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara-In the matter of the application of: XXX Ashish Thomas. TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS: 1. Petitioner(s) XXX Ashish Thomas has filed a petition for Change of Name with the clerk of this court for a decree changing names as follows: a.

XXX Ashish Thomas to Ash Thomas 2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted.

Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file written objection that includes the reasons for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing. NOTICE OF HEARING: Date: 08/02/2022 at 8:45 am, Probate Dept., located at 191 N. First Street, San Jose, CA 95113. 3. A copy of the Order to Show cause shall be published at least once a week for four successive weeks prior to the date set for hearing on the petition in El Observador, a

EL OBSERVADOR | www.el-observador.com newspaper of general circulation, printed in the county of Santa Clara.

Apr 22, 2022 Jacqueline M. Arroyo Judge of the Superior Court May 20, 27, June, 3, 10, 2022 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME NO. 22CV397713 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara-In the matter of the application of: Poojaben Prakashbhai Amin. TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS: 1.

Petitioner(s) Poojaben Prakashbhai Amin has filed a petition for Change of Name with the clerk of this court for a decree changing names as follows: a.

Poojaben Prakashbhai Amin to Pooja Amin 2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted.

Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file written objection that includes the reasons for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing. NOTICE OF HEARING: Date: 08/16/2022 at 8:45 am, Probate Dept., located at 191 N. First Street, San Jose, CA 95113. 3. A copy of the Order to Show cause shall be published at least once a week for four successive weeks prior to the date set for hearing on the petition in El Observador, a newspaper of general circulation, printed in the county of Santa Clara.

May 06, 2022 Jacqueline M. Arroyo Judge of the Superior Court May 20, 27, June, 3, 10, 2022

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME NO. 22CV396312 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara-In the matter of the application of: Alanna Setsuko Pardini. TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS: 1. Petitioner(s) Alanna Setsuko Pardini has filed a petition for Change of Name with the clerk of this court for a decree changing names as follows: a. Alanna Setsuko Pardini to Alanna Setsuko Kathryn Elder 2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted.

Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file written objection that includes the reasons for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing. NOTICE OF HEARING: Date: 07/05/2022 at 8:45 am, Probate Dept., located at 191 N. First Street, San Jose, CA 95113. 3. A copy of the Order to Show cause shall be published at least once a week for four successive weeks prior to the date set for hearing on the petition in El Observador, a newspaper of general circulation, printed in the county of Santa Clara.

Mar 30, 2022 Jacqueline M. Arroyo Judge of the Superior Court May 20, 27, June, 3, 10, 2022 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME NO. 22CV397806 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara-In the matter of the application of: Carla Alejandra Ramirez Ramirez. TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS: 1. Petitioner(s)

Carla Alejandra Ramirez Ramirez has filed a petition for Change of Name with the clerk of this court for a decree changing names as follows: a. Alerith Danette Sanchez Ramirez to Alerith Ramirez 2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted.

Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file written objection that includes the reasons for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing. NOTICE OF HEARING: Date: 08/23/2022 at 8:45 am, Probate Dept., located at 191 N. First Street, San Jose, CA 95113. 3. A copy of the Order to Show cause shall be published at least once a week for four successive weeks prior to the date set for hearing on the petition in El Observador, a newspaper of general circulation, printed in the county of Santa Clara.

May 10, 2022 Jacqueline M. Arroyo Judge of the Superior Court May 20, 27, June, 3, 10, 2022 FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT NO. 684952 The following person(s) is (are) doing business as: JP & Associates, 825 Fleming Aven., San Jose, CA 95127, Santa Clara County. This business is owned by an Individual. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are): John Grimaldo, 825 Fleming Ave., San Jose, CA 95127. The registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed above on 5/9/2022. This is a first filing. “I declare that all information in this

statement is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.) /s/ John Grimaldo This statement was filed with the Co. ClerkRecorder of Santa Clara County on 05/09/2022.

Regina Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder By: /s/ Mike Louie, Deputy File No. FBN 684952 May 13, 20, 27, June 3, 2022 FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT NO. 684876 The following person(s) is (are) doing business as: MODERN LOCK AND SECURITY, AAA DISCOUNT MOBILE LOCK & KEY, DISCOUNT MOBILE LOCKSMITHS, MODERN LOCK AND KEY, WILLOW GLEN LOCKSMITH, 1585 Hamilton Ave, San Jose, CA 95125, Santa Clara County. This business is owned by an Individual. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are): Andrew Wicker, 1585 Hamilton Avenue, San Jose, CA 95125. The registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed above on 2/12/2022. This is a Refile (No changes in facts from previous filing): Previous file# FBN598926. “I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.) /s/ Andrew Wicker This statement was filed with the Co. ClerkRecorder of Santa Clara County on 05/05/2022.

Regina Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder By: /s/ Sandy Chanthasy, Deputy File No. FBN 684876 May 13, 20, 27, June 3, 2022 FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT NO. 684788 The following person(s) is (are) doing business

JUN 03 - JUN 09, 2022 as: HELIO CONSULTING, 555 W. Middlefield Rd. Apt E310, Mountain View, 94043, Santa Clara County. This business is owned by an Individual. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are): Yiran Sun, 555 W. Middlefield Rd, Apt E310, Mountain View, CA 94043. The registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed above on 4/30/2022.

This filing is a first filing. “I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.) /s/ Yiran Sun This statement was filed with the Co. ClerkRecorder of Santa Clara County on 05/03/2022.

Regina Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder By: /s/ Sandy Chanthasy, Deputy File No. FBN 684788 May 13, 20, 27, June 3, 2022 FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT NO. 685004 The following person(s) is (are) doing business as: CLEAN FLOORS, 725 N. 21st Street, San Jose, CA 95112, Santa Clara County. This business is owned by a Corporation. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are): LIPMPIO BUILDING MAINTENANCE, 725 N. 21st, San Jose, CA 95112. The registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed above on N/A. This filing is a first filing. “I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.) /s/ Ricardo Sotero Huitron LIMPIO BUILDING MAINTENANCE CEO Article/Reg#: 3851178 Above entity was formed in the state of CA This statement was filed with the Co. ClerkRecorder of Santa Clara

County on 05/10/2022.

Regina Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder By: /s/ Elaine Fader, Deputy File No. FBN 685004 May 13, 20, 27, June 3, 2022 FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT NO. 684565 The following person(s) is (are) doing business as: Magnolia Creations, 7371 Forsum Rd., San Jose, CA 95138 , Santa Clara County. This business is owned by an Individual. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are): Ana Silvia Guevara, 7371 Forsum Rd., San Jose, CA 95138. The registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed above on N/A. This filing is a first filing. “I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.) /s/ Ana Silvia Guevara This statement was filed with the Co. ClerkRecorder of Santa Clara County on 04/26/2022.

Regina Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder By: /s/ Elaine Fader, Deputy File No. FBN 684565 May 13, 20, 27, June 3, 2022 FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT NO. 684485 The following person(s) is (are) doing business as: RUBI BEAUTY, 5769 Seifert Ave, San Jose, CA 95118, Santa Clara County. This business is owned by an Individual. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are): PERLA RUBI REYNOSO, 5769 Seifert Ave, San Jose, CA 95118. The registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed above on 12/14/2021. This filing is a first filing. “I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or

JUN 03 - JUN 09, 2022 she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.) /s/ Perla Rubi Reynoso This statement was filed with the Co. ClerkRecorder of Santa Clara County on 04/22/2022.

Regina Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder By: /s/ Elaine Fader, Deputy File No. FBN 684485 May 13, 20, 27, June 3, 2022 FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT NO. 684953 The following person(s) is (are) doing business as: J&S Cleaning Services, 88 Rancho Dr., Unit C, San Jose, CA 95111, Santa Clara County. This business is owned by an Individual. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are): Juan Figueroa, 88 Rancho Dr, Unit C, San Jose, CA 95111. The registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed above on N/A. This filing is a first filing. “I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.) /s/ Juan Figueroa This statement was filed with the Co. ClerkRecorder of Santa Clara County on 05/09/2022.

Regina Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder By: /s/ Elaine Fader, Deputy File No. FBN 684953 May 13, 20, 27, June 3, 2022 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME NO. 22CV397717 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara-In the matter of the application of: Sai Krishna Chaitanya Govada and Keerthana Thangaraju. TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS: 1. Petitioner(s) Sai Krishna Chaitanya Govada and Keerthana Thangaraju has filed a petition for Change of Name with the clerk of this court for a decree changing names as follows: a. Tara Keerthana

to Tara Keerthana Govada. 2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted.

Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file written objection that includes the reasons for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing. NOTICE OF HEARING: Date: 08/23/2022 at 8:45 am, Probate Dept., located at 191 N. First Street, San Jose, CA 95113. 3. A copy of the Order to Show cause shall be published at least once a week for four successive weeks prior to the date set for hearing on the petition in El Observador, a newspaper of general circulation, printed in the county of Santa Clara.

May 06, 2022 Jacqueline M. Arroyo Judge of the Superior Court May 13, 20, 27, June 3, 2022 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME NO. 22CV397807 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara-In the matter of the application of: Bui, Thuy Thi and La, Quy Vinh. TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS: 1.

Petitioner(s) Bui, Thuy Thi and LA, Quy Vinh. has filed a petition for Change of Name with the clerk of this court for a decree changing names as follows: a.

Ngam Kim La to Emily Kim Ngan La. 2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted.

Any person objecting to the name changes described above must

EL OBSERVADOR | www.el-observador.com file written objection that includes the reasons for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing. NOTICE OF HEARING: Date: 08/23/2022 at 8:45 am, Probate Dept., located at 191 N. First Street, San Jose, CA 95113. 3. A copy of the Order to Show cause shall be published at least once a week for four successive weeks prior to the date set for hearing on the petition in El Observador, a newspaper of general circulation, printed in the county of Santa Clara.

May 10, 2022 Jacqueline M. Arroyo Judge of the Superior Court May 13, 20, 27, June 3, 2022 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME NO. 22CV397687 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara-In the matter of the application of: Raul Salcedo Torres. TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS: 1. Petitioner(s) Raul Salcedo Torres has filed a petition for Change of Name with the clerk of this court for a decree changing names as follows: a. Raul Salcedo Torres to Raul Torres. 2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted.

Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file written objection that includes the reasons for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing. NOTICE OF HEAR-

ING: Date: 08/16/2022 at 8:45 am, Probate Dept., located at 191 N. First Street, San Jose, CA 95113. 3. A copy of the Order to Show cause shall be published at least once a week for four successive weeks prior to the date set for hearing on the petition in El Observador, a newspaper of general circulation, printed in the county of Santa Clara.

May 05, 2022 Jacqueline M. Arroyo Judge of the Superior Court May 13, 20, 27, June 3, 2022 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME NO. 22CV397716 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara-In the matter of the application of: Seyedeh Masoomeh Mardani. TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS: 1. Petitioner(s) Seyedeh Masoomeh Mardani has filed a petition for Change of Name with the clerk of this court for a decree changing names as follows: a.

Seyedeh M. Mardani aka Seyedeh Masoomeh Mardani. 2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted.

Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file written objection that includes the reasons for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing. NOTICE OF HEARING: Date: 08/16/2022 at 8:45 am, Probate Dept., located at 191 N. First Street, San Jose, CA 95113. 3. A copy of the Order to Show cause shall be published at least once a week for four successive weeks prior to the date set for hearing on the petition in El Observador, a

newspaper of general circulation, printed in the county of Santa Clara.

May 6, 2022 Jacqueline M. Arroyo Judge of the Superior Court May 13, 20, 27, June 3, 2022 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME NO. 22CV397404 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara-In the matter of the application of: Claudia Miguel. TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS: 1. Petitioner(s) Claudia Miguel has filed a petition for Change of Name with the clerk of this court for a decree changing names as follows: a. Claudia Miguel to Makiko Miguel Yoshizawa. 2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted.

Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file written objection that includes the reasons for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing. NOTICE OF HEARING: Date: 08/16/2022 at 8:45 am, Probate Dept., located at 191 N. First Street, San Jose, CA 95113. 3. A copy of the Order to Show cause shall be published at least once a week for four successive weeks prior to the date set for hearing on the petition in El Observador, a newspaper of general circulation, printed in the county of Santa Clara.

March 04, 2022 Jacqueline M. Arroyo Judge of the Superior Court May 13, 20, 27, June 3, 2022 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME

NO. 22CV397543 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara-In the matter of the application of: Xiao Lu and Qiuyun Shen. TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS: 1.

Petitioner(s) Xiao Lu and Qiuyun Shen has filed a petition for Change of Name with the clerk of this court for a decree changing names as follows: a. Sebastian Lyu to Sebastian Chenye Lyu. 2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted.

Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file written objection that includes the reasons for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing. NOTICE OF HEARING: Date: 08/16/2022 at 8:45 am, Probate Dept., located at 191 N. First Street, San Jose, CA 95113. 3. A copy of the Order to Show cause shall be published at least once a week for four successive weeks prior to the date set for hearing on the petition in El Observador, a newspaper of general circulation, printed in the county of Santa Clara.

May 03, 2022 Jacqueline M. Arroyo Judge of the Superior Court May 13, 20, 27, June 3, 2022 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME NO. 22CV397880 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara-In the matter of the application of: Thi Thuy Diem Nguyen. TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS: 1. Petitioner(s) Thi Thuy Diem Nguyen has filed a petition for Change of Name with the clerk of this court for a decree changing

CLASSIFIEDS / LEGALS names as follows: a.

Hoang Gia Bao Nguyen to Brian Gia Bao Nguyen.

2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted.

Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file written objection that includes the reasons for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing. NOTICE OF HEARING: Date: 08/23/2022 at 8:45 am, Probate Dept., located at 191 N. First Street, San Jose, CA 95113. 3. A copy of the Order to Show cause shall be published at least once a week for four successive weeks prior to the date set for hearing on the petition in El Observador, a newspaper of general circulation, printed in the county of Santa Clara.

May 11, 2022 Jacqueline M. Arroyo Judge of the Superior Court May 13, 20, 27, June 3, 2022 2nd Amended ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME NO. 21CV392757 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara-In the matter of the application of: Patricia Liliana Guerrero. TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS: 1. Petitioner(s) Patricia Liliana Guerrero has filed a petition for Change of Name with the clerk of this court for a decree changing names as follows: a.

Patricia Liliana Guerrero aka Liliana Miranda Guerrero Lashgari to Patricia Liliana Guerrero Lashgari. 2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the pe-

21

tition for change of name should not be granted.

Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file written objection that includes the reasons for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing. NOTICE OF HEARING: Date: 06/07/22 at 8:45 am, Probate Dept., located at 191 N. First Street, San Jose, CA 95113. 3. A copy of the Order to Show cause shall be published at least once a week for four successive weeks prior to the date set for hearing on the petition in El Observador, a newspaper of general circulation, printed in the county of Santa Clara.

May 11, 2022.

Jacqueline M. Arroyo Judge of the Superior Court May 13, 20, 27, June 3, 2022

22

NATIONAL

EL OBSERVADOR | www.el-observador.com

JUN 03 - JUN 09, 2022

ENGLISH

CROSS-RACIAL SOLIDARITY AGAINST RACIST VIOLENCE: THE LEGACY OF VINCENT CHIN

F

Jenny Manrique Ethnic Media Services

orty years ago, on the eve of his wedding, a young Chinese American named Vincent Chin was fatally beaten with a baseball bat on the streets of Detroit by two white men shouting anti-Asian slurs.

The miscarriage of justice that followed – neither assailant served a day in jail for the crime – marked the birth of the modern day Asian American civil rights movement.

Noting the parallels between 1982 and 2022, Zia recalled that Chin’s murder occurred amidst mounting public fears that manufacturing jobs were relocating to Asia even as inflation, fueled by an oil crisis, had already hit 20%. Meanwhile the Reagan administration was dismantling social safety programs such as unemployment benefits, food stamps, and mental health services – policies whose impacts are still being felt today.

“There were people in the C-suites, the heads of the auto industries, people in the halls of Congress saying we are at war because Japan makes fuel efficient cars,” said Zia, ignoring the fact that German cars were even more fuel efficient. “It was a scapegoat to blame some external force for the difficulties that were happening internally in America.”

That has happened repeatedly in American history, Zia noted, pointing to the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882 that banned Chinese laborers from immigrating to the U.S., and the Trump administration’s national security program that focused counterintelligence resources on fighting “Chinese espionage.”

Then, as now, Asian Americans came together with Black Americans, Arab Americans, and people from all walks of life, social classes, and faiths to denounce racist violence, Zia said, despite concentrated efforts to keep people divided, including misinformation implying that much of the rise in antiAsian hate crimes are committed by Blacks.

‘Replacement theory’ drives racist-fueled attacks Zia noted that the majority of assailants against Asians are white and that Black leaders – from Jesse Jackson to Stacey Abrams to Kareem Abdul-Jabbar – have denounced Asian violence, even as Asians have mobilized to support the Black Lives Matter protests in the wake of George’s

Poor data on hate crimes

“This hate is based on the ‘replacement theory’ in which extremists argue that all of our communities of color are seeking to replace white Christian males with guns,” Yang noted. “There's a great deal of despair, but we’ll do all we can to help dismantle it.”

Michael German, a fellow with the Brennan Center for Justice's Liberty & National Security Program who formerly investigated white supremacists for the FBI, argues that until there is more accurate official data on hate crimes, “people won’t understand that white racism is much more common in our society, that it in many ways is foundational in our society.”

Yang spoke of the strong support he personally received from Black, Latino and Native American civil rights leaders following incidents such as the mass shooting of Asian beauticians in Atlanta last year. “There is an allyship I found among my communities of color,” he added.

What made Chin’s killing even more egregious, said Helen Zia, author and veteran activist for AAPI and LGBTQ communities who worked in Detroit at the time of Chin’s murder, was that “there was no question in anybody's minds, had the killers been black or Asian, had they not been white, they would have gone to prison for a very long time. So the sense of injustice was great.”

Zia spoke at an Ethnic Media Services briefing on May 27th to highlight plans for a special 40th anniversary commemoration of Chin’s death in Detroit (June 16-19) and efforts to build stronger cross-racial solidarity to confront today’s surge in racist violence.

tice (AAJC).

Vincent Chin. Photo Credit: Courtesy of American Citizens of Justice

Floyd murder.

“A study done by the University of Michigan that came out in the summer of 2021 shows that 75% of the attackers of Asian Americans are white,” said John C. Yang, president and CEO, Asian Americans Advancing Jus-

Lisa Cylar Barrett, director of Policy at the NAACP Legal Defense Fund, singled out “a running narrative” that holds that if one group gets ahead automatically, another group is left out or falls behind. The narrative is perpetuated by “a white power structure that seeks to maintain control and is fearful of the growing communities of color in this country.”

“We've had folks in political offices and media stations, corporate representatives creating an environment where misinformation and disinformation has become normalized,” Barrett said. “And we have to do more to push back against that narrative with stories that really help folks see the humanity in one another.”

¡Clipper en su teléfono!

Moverse por el área de la Bahía es fácil. Añada Clipper a Apple Pay o Google PayTM para pagar las tarifas de transporte.

Con Clipper en su teléfono, puede: • cargar dinero en su tarjeta Clipper al instante con Apple Pay o Google Pay; • pasar su teléfono por los lectores de Clipper cuando tome un autobús, tren o ferri; • configurar fácilmente una nueva tarjeta Clipper o transferir una tarjeta plástica ya existente.

¡Pague las tarifas de transporte con su teléfono hoy mismo!

Obtenga más información en clippercard.com Puede pagar con

Por un tiempo limitado, ¡tarjetas gratis en su teléfono!

Right now, he called official data on hate crimes “so poor.”

Despite passage of the Hate Crime Statistics Act in 1990, requiring the Department of Justice to collect “accurate data,” the DOJ’s policy has been to defer the investigation of hate crimes to state and local law enforcement, though only about 15% of police departments acknowledge such crimes occur within their jurisdiction, German pointed out.

While the Bureau of Justice’s National Crime Victimization Survey reports an average of 230,000 violent hate crimes a year, the DOJ prosecutes just 25 defendants a year.

“There were always racist dog whistles that politicians would use to try to get votes,” German said. “But what's occurring now is that they are actually openly supporting these causes, appearing at campaign events with members of right-wing militant groups.”

Speakers noted that the Biden-Harris administration has issued a directive to federal agencies to look at how they can “make racial equity real.” The Justice Department, meanwhile, is expected to release several new initiatives in the coming week aimed at addressing the recent rise in hate crimes that are mostly targeting Black and AAPI communities.

These efforts need to permeate down to other elected officials in legislatures and school boards, and to the community, the speakers agreed.

Zia also pointed to states like Illinois and New Jersey that passed bills to create curriculums for K-12 that acknowledge the real history of Asian Americans. At least nine other states are discussing similar initiatives.

Events commemorating Vincent Chin Vincent Chin’s legacy will be honored through a series of live streaming events at Vincentchin.org. The site includes a guide translated into several Asian languages that tell the stories of cross-racial solidarity and understanding among communities and the history of civil rights in America.

Alongside other Asian-American organizations, AAJC is leading the “Unity March” on June 25, a multicultural event where Black, Indigenous, Latinx, Pacific Islander, LGBTQ+, Muslim, Sikh Arab and Jewish people will come together in Washington D.C. to demand cultural equity and racial justice.

JUN 03 - JUN 09, 2022

NATIONAL

EL OBSERVADOR | www.el-observador.com

23

ESPAÑOL

SOLIDARIDAD INTERRACIAL CONTRA LA VIOLENCIA RACISTA: EL LEGADO DE VINCENT CHIN

H

Jenny Manrique Ethnic Media Services

que exige que el Departamento de Justicia recopile "datos precisos", la política del DOJ ha sido diferir la investigación de los delitos de odio a las fuerzas del orden estatales y locales, pero solo alrededor del 15% de los departamentos de policía reconocen que esos ocurren dentro de su jurisdicción, señaló German.

ace cuarenta años, en la víspera de su boda, un joven estadounidense de origen chino llamado Vincent Chin fue golpeado fatalmente con un bate de béisbol en las calles de Detroit por dos hombres blancos que gritaban insultos contra los asiáticos.

El asesinato fue alimentado por los temores generalizados de que los trabajos de fabricación se trasladaran a Asia.

El error judicial que siguió (ninguno de los agresores pasó un día en la cárcel por el crimen) marcó el nacimiento del movimiento de derechos civiles asiático-estadounidense moderno.

Lo que hizo que el asesinato de Chin fuera aún más atroz, dijo Helen Zia, autora y veterana activista de las comunidades AAPI y LGBTQ que trabajaba en Detroit en el momento del crimen, fue que "nadie tenía dudas que si los asesinos hubiesen sido negros o asiáticos, si no hubieran sido blancos, habrían ido a prisión por mucho tiempo. Así que la sensación de injusticia era grande”.

Zia habló en una conferencia de prensa de Ethnic Media Services el 27 de mayo para destacar los planes para el 40 aniversario que conmemora la muerte de Chin en Detroit (del 16 al 19 de junio), y los esfuerzos para construir una solidaridad interracial más fuerte para enfrentar el aumento actual de la violencia racista.

Al notar los paralelismos entre 1982 y 2022, Zia recordó que el asesinato de Chin ocurrió en medio de crecientes temores públicos de que los trabajos de manufactura se estaban reubicando en Asia, incluso cuando la inflación, impulsada por una crisis del petróleo, ya había alcanzado el 20%. Mientras tanto, la administración Reagan estaba desmantelando los programas de seguridad social, como los beneficios por desempleo, los cupones para alimentos y los servicios de salud mental, políticas cuyos impactos aún se sienten hoy.

“Había gente entre los altos ejecutivos, los jefes de las industrias automotrices y gente en los pasillos del Congreso diciendo que estamos en guerra porque Japón fabrica autos que ahorran combustible”, dijo Zia, ignorando el hecho de que los autos alemanes eran aún más eficientes en combustible. “Era un chivo expiatorio culpar a alguna fuerza externa por las dificultades que estaban ocurriendo internamente en Estados Unidos”.

Eso ha sucedido repetidamente en la historia de Estados Unidos, señaló Zia, mencionando la Ley de Exclusión China de 1882 que prohibió a los trabajadores chinos emigrar a Estados Unidos, y el

Si bien las encuestas de víctimas de la Oficina de Asistencia Judicial informan un promedio de 230,000 delitos de odio violentos al año, el Departamento de Justicia procesa a 25 acusados al año.

Photo Credit: Katie Godowski / Pexels

programa de seguridad nacional de la administración Trump que enfocó los recursos de contrainteligencia en la lucha contra el “espionaje chino”.

Entonces, como ahora, los estadounidenses de origen asiático se unieron a los negros, árabes y personas de todas las clases sociales y religiones para denunciar la violencia racista, dijo Zia, a pesar de los esfuerzos concentrados para mantener a la gente dividida, incluida la información errónea que sugiere que gran parte del aumento de los crímenes de odio contra los asiáticos son cometidos por negros.

Zia señaló que la mayoría de los agresores contra los asiáticos son blancos y que los líderes negros, desde Jesse Jackson hasta Stacey Abrams y Kareem Abdul-Jabbar, han denunciado la violencia asiática, al igual que los asiáticos se han movilizado para apoyar las protestas de Black Lives Matter a raíz del asesinato de George Floyd.

“Un estudio realizado por la Universidad de Michigan que se publicó en el verano de 2021 muestra que el 75 % de los atacantes de estadounidenses de origen asiático son blancos”, dijo John C. Yang, presidente y director ejecutivo de Asian Americans Advancing Justice (AAJC).

“Este odio se basa en la ‘teoría del reemplazo’ en la que los extremistas argumentan que todas nuestras comunidades étnicas buscan reemplazar a los hombres cristianos blancos con armas”, señaló Yang. “Hay mucha desesperación, pero haremos todo lo posible para ayudar a desmantelarla”.

Yang habló sobre el fuerte apoyo que recibió personalmente de los líderes de derechos civiles negros, latinos y nativos americanos luego de incidentes como el tiroteo masivo de esteticistas asiáticas

en Atlanta el año pasado.

“Cuando hablamos de cómo debemos unirnos, debemos reconocer que existe ese principio unificador. Con respecto a la tragedia convertida en angustia, hay un aliado que siembre encuentro entre mis comunidades de color”, agregó.

Lisa Cylar Barrett, directora de políticas del Fondo de Defensa Legal de la NAACP, destacó “una narrativa continua” que sostiene que si un grupo avanza, automáticamente otro grupo se queda fuera o atrás. La narrativa es perpetuada por “una estructura de poder blanca que busca mantener el control y teme a las crecientes comunidades étnicas en este país”.

“Siempre había silbatos racistas que los políticos usaban para tratar de obtener votos”, dijo German. “Pero lo que está ocurriendo ahora es que están apoyando abiertamente estas causas, apareciendo en eventos de campaña con miembros de grupos militantes de derecha”.

Los oradores señalaron que la administración Biden-Harris ha emitido una directiva a las agencias federales para ver cómo pueden “hacer realidad la equidad racial”. Por su parte, se espera que el Departamento de Justicia dé a conocer en la próxima semana varias iniciativas nuevas destinadas a hacer frente al reciente aumento de los delitos de odio que se dirigen sobre todo a las comunidades negra y AAPI. Es necesario que estos esfuerzos lleguen a otros funcionarios electos en legislaturas y juntas escolares, y a la comunidad, acordaron.

“Hemos tenido personas en oficinas políticas y estaciones de medios, representantes corporativos creando un entorno donde la información errónea y la desinformación se han normalizado”, dijo Barrett. “Y tenemos que hacer más frente a esa narrativa con historias que realmente ayuden a las personas a ver la humanidad en los demás”.

Zia también mencionó estados como Illinois y Nueva Jersey que aprobaron proyectos de ley para crear planes de estudio para K-12 que reconocen la historia real de los asiático-estadounidenses. Al menos otros nueve estados están discutiendo iniciativas similares.

Datos deficientes

El legado de Vincent Chin será honrado a través de una serie de eventos de transmisión en vivo en Vincentchin. org. Incluye una guía traducida a varios idiomas asiáticos para contar las historias de solidaridad, puntos en común y comprensión entre las comunidades y la historia de los derechos civiles en Estados Unidos.

Michael German, miembro del Programa de Libertad y Seguridad Nacional del Centro Brennan para la Justicia que anteriormente investigó a los supremacistas blancos para el FBI, argumenta que hasta que no haya datos oficiales más precisos sobre los delitos de odio, “la gente no entenderá que el racismo blanco es mucho más común en nuestra sociedad, que en muchos sentidos es fundacional en nuestra sociedad”.

Calificó los datos oficiales actuales sobre crímenes de odio como “muy pobres”.

A pesar de la aprobación de la Ley de Estadísticas de Delitos de Odio en 1990,

Eventos

Junto con otras organizaciones asiático-estadounidenses, la AAJC encabezará la "Marcha de la Unidad" el 25 de junio, un evento multicultural en el que negros, indígenas, latinos, isleños del Pacífico, LGBTQ+, musulmanes, árabes sij y judíos se movilizarán juntos en Washington D.C. para exigir equidad cultural y justicia racial.

24

EL OBSERVADOR | www.el-observador.com

JUN 03 - JUN 09, 2022

EVERY LITTLE PATIENT IS A BIG DEAL No two families are the same. That’s why we offer personalized, high-quality pediatric care for you and your littlest loved ones. To learn more, visit kp.org/sanjose.

Scan code to watch a video about our services in the South Bay.

Tomorrow’s health care. Today.