WP selected works, Huwayda Fakhry

Page 1

Huwayda Fakhry Selected Works 2012-2014


An Eixample of South Central Los Angeles

Scary Monsters and Super Creeps

1

7

Arts of Mars

STL [small transportable living]

15

21

SCIO shower shoe

29

We Are Heading West 33


9:12:3


An Eixample of South Central Los Angeles critic

Jeffrey Inaba

In a city widely considered to be one of the least connected metropolitan areas of it’s size, Los Angeles is looking to invest in new public transportation programs that will not only increase the job market but also develop a lifeline between the city as a whole, facilitating housing development and integration within neighborhoods that are typically disparate. There are several reasons for this separation, not the least of which is the distance required to traverse the region via automobile. Thishousing proposal for an area in South Central Los Angeles is at the junction of several new proposals for municipal development of high speed train and bus lines. Applying the theories of Edward Soja and ‘spatial justice’ to the formal concepts enacted by Cerda in the Eixample, Barcelona, a framework was designed that divided up city plots and their subsequent residential constructs into spatially ‘just’ or equal allotments according to the number of inhabitants. Additionally, in order to force the neighbors to utilize the future transportation options available to them, the footage was maximized on each block to encourage two key social factors. The first is a necessary interaction between the residents due to the density and organization of the units. The second is a deliberate lack of large unused ‘green’ space to force residents to travel in order to experience shared public experience (to utilize their options for exploring the larger urban fabric).


2


3

one, two and three bedroom configurations


4

Typologies

typologies site narrative


5

sections and thresholds


6

Site Axonometric

site axonometric


Scary Monsters and Super Creeps critic

Jason Payne

All houses in the canon called “experimentalâ€? are strange in some way or another. Robie House, Farnsworth House, Villa Savoye, Villa Moller, Rietveld SchrĂśder House, Schindler House, Neutra House, the Case Study Houses, and theirs (like all) exhibit certain unsettling qualities that, originally at least, makes them challenging. On the fringes of this cohort, however, is a different breed of experimental house that never quite fits in but nevertheless insists in a most disruptive way on some form of canonical reckoning. Geeks, perhaps, or Nerds, with a Goth chick in tow, this group of misfits is clearly a brilliant bunch yet seems not to care whether we get them or not. Ambivalent. Definitely peripheral to the canon but not outside of it either, historians and designers alike struggle to make sense of the messy heresies of this weird subculture. There is a limit, after all, to the measure of difficulty tolerable in any single object beyond which rational minds turn away in frustration. What divides these bright but eccentric stars from the high achievers lies at this threshold, where interpretive difficulty moves from the manageable to the unmanageable. This is what makes them strange.


8


9

Keisler’s model, ideal geometry


10

Aperture A

Aperture C

Aperture B

Aperture D Aperture E

new model, plan


11

B

B

A

roid

Sphe

A

1

roid

Sphe

2

Top View- Spheroid 1

X

Y

A

A

B

C

D

E

hh

Top View- Spheroid 2

F G

H I J

K L M N O P Q R S

T U VW X

Y

Z

aa bb cc dd eeff gg hhii

jjkk

llmmnn oo ppqq

rr ss tt uu vv ww xx yy zz AA BB CC DD EE FF GG

HHII JJ KK

Q

R

ff

S

P O

ee

T

N M L

cc

U bb

K J

aa

V W

X

Y

Z

I H G F E

D C

B

A

Unraveled- Spheroid 2

Unraveled- Spheroid 1


12

B

B

A

A

id

hero

3

Sp

id

ro

he

Sp

4

A

A

ll

W

X

nn

Top View- Spheroid 3

Top View- Spheroid 4

A

B

C D E F G H I J K L M N O

A

P Q

B

R S

C T U

D V W

E F G H I

ii

hh

xx ww

J K

L M X N Y

O

Z

P

aa

Q

bb

R

cc

S

dd T

ee ff

U

gg V

hh W

ii jj

Unraveled- Spheroid 3

kk ll mm nn

deconstructed formal analysis

Unraveled- Spheroid 4

vv uu

tt

ss

rr

qq pp

oo

nn

mm ll

kk

jj

ii

hh

gg

ff

ee

dd

cc

bb

aa

Z

Y

X


13

A

A

A

B

A

B

Aperture A

Aperture C

C

B

Aperture B

Aperture D

C

Aperture E

E

analysis of sectional geometry

C

D

C

D

E

B

D E

D


14

Continuity, time-space-architecture and endlessness are the concepts Frederick Kiesler used to describe his singular idea. With the endless house Kiesler meant to create, through light and material, a stage for living; a liberation of space through self exploration of the psyche, breaking through the prison of the frame. This results in a form that is derived from vision not from function. What estranges Kieslers endless house from traditional architectural rhetoric or classification is its temporally and culturally maladaptive nature. In other words, it both representationally and theoretically floats between eras and ideologies, a meditative parenthesis. Much like Kiesler’s project, this analysis exists between two worlds, that of geometric precision and phenomenology. With a preference for Kiesler’s drawings in mind, over the more brutal physical models he developed, the decision was made to refine and make precise the curvature of the house by using the geometries of the sphere and the spheroid, the shapes which Kiesler defined as having the qualities of endlessness. Using these geometries to gain control of the curvature, and to simultaneously enhance and create a stronger relationship between the model and Kiesler’s theory. The qualities of the project included the ability for light and program to travel through space without obstruction or corners. Thus, the white polished model speaks to the continuity, smoothness, and lightness of materials that are missing in Kiesler’s model. Through the manipulation of primitive geometries to create an ‘ideal’ parametric form, while also bettering and perhaps achieving the sensory and material attributes that Kiesler sought to bring to the endless house, this subtle refinement more clearly displays Keisler’s intuitive genius.


Arts of Mars critic

Kivi Sotamaa

The studio focuses on exploring choreography as a design method, with the aim of creating a building as an urban, dynamic and flexible constellation of forms, spaces, and systems. Rather than an enclosed, hierarchically organized, static entity, like many institutional projects, the aim here is to explore and create new opportunities and ideas for the city through design, rather than focusing on existing problem solving. The design will use (phenomenal) movement as the organizing driver and explore martial arts as new inspiration for form, space, and effects of phenomenal movement. Martial arts combat creates situations where two or more discreet entities are joined by shared dynamics of the battle. Re-originating the dynamics of the fight into architecture may offer new insights into creating coherent wholesout of otherwise disparate and discreet parts.

1Dynamic(al)

adj. of or relating to physical force or energy..marked usually by continuous and productive activity or change( a city)

2Primitive

adj. of or relating to the earliest age or period... characteristic of an early age of development

3Program

n. a plan or system under which action may be taken toward a goal

4Relation

n. an aspect or quality (as resemblance) that connects two or more things or parts as being or belonging or working together or as being of the

same kind


16


17

145’

102’

74’

64’

49’

25’

h.

15’

Section 1:100 -10’

section


18

circulation, program and perspective


19

Elevations a. south, b. east, c. north, d. west

Elevations a. south, b. east, c. north, d. west

Elevations a. south, b. east, c. north, d. west a.

a.

b.

b.

Elevations a. south, b. east, c. north, d. west

a. a.

five views

c.

b.

d.

b.

c.

d.


20

model, black and white


STL [small transportable living] critic

Peter Ebner, 3M Future LAB

A research proposal was developed on existing and emerging additive manufacturing technologies and materials for a future housing development. The focus of this analysis was to understand and explore the potential for3D printing to develop housing in geographic locations and climates that are otherwise too hostile or costly for development because of their accessibility. By using a beta tested robot or team of robots to reach such regions that lack stable infrastructural foundation for construction, a framework for cellular housing modules is erected using native resources such as sand or stone. These materials, combined with binding agents, allow for structurally sound construction of new housing prototypes without the risk or expense of traditional labor forces and material transportation/assembly.


22

9:12:3


23

z

x y

B A

B A

B A

gantry trajectory and possible unit forms


24

terrain a


25


26

terrain b


27

sectional possibilities for aggregation


28

plan with gantry trajectory


SCIO shower shoe critic

Peter Ebner, 3M Future LAB

In conjunction with the design of the washroom and water systems of the STL house, a flexible and functional shoe was developed to be worn directly from the street into the shower. With limited washing space, a system of ‘hygienic’ cones were incorporated into the sole of the shoe that act as both an aid in cleaning the wearer as well as a stimulating, orthopedic element. As such, a prototype was developed using sintered plastic that was both light and comfortable.


30


31

1

1 2

2

3

Section

Indoor/outdoor shoe th worn in the shower. Es allows for a minimal am the shoe and ultimately through which water ca feet of the user. There holes, one in the front a allow for additional wat is flexible and therefore into small spaces. The the shoe to transition fr indoor house bootie.

1 tubes 2 ribbons 3 hygienic cones 4 drainage

44

SCIO Shoe 1 2 3 4

section detail and narratives

3

SCIO Shoe

-

Tubes Ribbons Hygenic cones Drainage


32

narrative and prototype, 1:4


We Are Heading West critic

Roger Sherman

(ongoing research) Utilizing

the lens of Instagram to reanalyze the ontology and psychology of Sunset Boulevard. This text is based on the following notion: The 22 mile stretch of municipally funded roadbed designated, Sunset Boulevard, begins in Pacific Palisades, CA at a 76 gas station on the corner of the Pacific Coast Highway. It terminates at the intersection of Figueroa Street in downtown Los Angeles, CA. The immeasurable stretch of real estate designated, #sunsetboulevard has no discernable point of origin but it can be assumed that it stems from the documented site in Southern California. It does not terminate and at the present time cannot be structured or directed according to municipal constraints or legislation.

#sunsetboulevard is the longest road in the world.


34


35

Today, abstraction is no longer that of the map, the double, the mirror or the concept. Simulation is nolonger that of territory, a referential being, or a substance. It is the generation by models of a real without origin or reality: a hyperreal. The territory no longer precedes the map, nor does it survive it. It is nevertheless the map that precedes the territory-precession of simulacra- that engenders the territory, and if one must return to the fable, today it is the territory whose shreds slowly rot across the extent of the map. It is the real, and not the map, whose vestiges persist here and there in the deserts that are no longer those of the Empire, but ours. The desert of the real itself.

J.Baudrillard, Simulacra and Simulation


36

Okavango, Botswana latitude: -19° 30’ 0” longitude: 23° 0’ 0”

Cyprus

latitude: 35° 20’ 33” longitude: 33° 19’ 22”

Turkey

Greece

Formazza, Italy

latitude: 39° 0’ 0” longitude: 35° 0’ 0”

New Delhi, India latitude: 28° 36’ 0” longitude: 77° 12’ 0”

latitude: 39° 0’ 0” longitude: 22° 0’ 0”

latitude: 46° 22’ 0” longitude: 8° 25’ 59”

Sydney, Australia

Phillipines

latitude: -33° 52’ 59” longitude: 151° 13’ 0”

latitude: 13° 0’ 0” longitude: 13° 0’ 0”

Porto, Portugal

Germany

latitude: 53° 37’ 59” longitude: 10° 0’ 0”

Sweden

Denmark

latitude: 59° 19’ 59” longitude: 18° 3’ 0”

latitude: 57° 22’ 0” longitude: 10° 15’ 0”

Tecklenburg, Germany latitude: 52° 13’ 0” longitude: 7° 49’ 59”

latitude: 39° 4’ 0” longitude: -9° 1’ 59”

Calabria, Italy

latitude: 39° 0’ 0” longitude: 16° 30’ 0”

Moscow, Russia

Victoria, Australia

latitude: 55° 45’ 7” longitude: 37° 36’ 56”

Glasgow, Scotland

latitude: -30° 10’ 59” longitude: 119° 6’ 0”

latitude: 55° 49’ 59” longitude: -4° 15’ 0”

Ore Mountains, Germany/Czech Republic latitude: 50° 30’ 0” longitude: 13° 10’ 0”

Brisbane, Australia latitude: -27° 30’ 0” longitude: 153° 1’ 0”

Denmark

latitude: 57° 22’ 0” longitude: 10° 15’ 0”

Lisbon, Portugal latitude: 38° 43’ 0” longitude: -9° 7’ 59”

Seoul, South Korea latitude: 37° 33’ 59” longitude: 126° 59’ 58”

Phillipines

latitude: 13° 0’ 0” longitude: 13° 0’ 0”

Phillipines

latitude: 13° 0’ 0” longitude: 13° 0’ 0”

Rome, Italy

latitude: 41° 54’ 0” longitude: 12° 28’ 59”

Cartagena, Costa Rica latitude: 10° 22’ 59” longitude: -85° 40’ 59”

Key West, Florida, USA latitude: 24° 33’ 20” longitude: -81° 46’ 57”

Puerto Rico

Denmark

latitude: 18° 28’ 6” longitude: -66° 6’ 30”

latitude: 57° 22’ 0” longitude: 10° 15’ 0”

Chicago, Illinois, USA

Phillipines

latitude: 13° 0’ 0” longitude: 13° 0’ 0”

Searcy, Arkansas, USA

Denmark

latitude: 41° 51’ 0” longitude: -87° 39’ 0”

latitude: 57° 22’ 0” longitude: 10° 15’ 0”

latitude: 34° 44’ 17” longitude: -92° 15’ 58”

Rome, Italy

Puget Sound, Washington, USA

latitude: 41° 54’ 0” longitude: 12° 28’ 59”

latitude: 47° 49’ 59” longitude: -122° 26’ 4”

Nebraska, USA

latitude: 40° 44’ 30” longitude: -98° 52’ 26”

New Hampshire, USA

Kansas City, Missouri

latitude: 43° 2’ 23” longitude: -71° 27’ 18”

latitude: 39° 6’ 51” longitude: -94° 37’ 38”

Cologne, Germany latitude: 50° 55’ 59” longitude: 6° 57’ 0”

Baton Rouge, Louisiana latitude: 30° 27’ 2” longitude: -91° 9’ 16”

Bristol, United Kingdom

latitude: 40° 42’ 51” longitude: -74° 0’ 21”

latitude: 34° 3’ 8” longitude: -118° 14’ 37”

latitude: 37° 46’ 29” Beach, California longitude: -122° 25’Newport 9” 33° 37’ 8” Riverside, California San Francisco, Californialatitude: longitude: -117° 55’ 44” latitude: 38° 31’ 8” latitude: 37° 46’ 29” Bakersfield, CA longitude: -121° 31’ 13” longitude: -122° 25’ 9” latitude: 35° 22’ 23” Oakland, CA longitude: -119° 1’ 7” Los Angeles, California latitude: 37° 48’ 15” San Francisco, CA latitude: 34° 3’ 8” longitude: -122° 16’ 14” latitude: 37° 46’ 29” longitude: -118° 14’ 37” San Francisco, CA longitude: -122° 25’ 9” Anaheim, California, latitude: 37° 46’ 29” San Francisco, CA latitude: 33° 50’ 7” longitude: -122° 25’ 9” longitude: -117° 54’ 52” Tucson, Arizona latitude: 37° 46’ 29” latitude: 32° 13’ 18” longitude: -122° 25’ 9” longitude: -110° 55’ 35”

Punta Cana, Dominican Republic latitude: 19° 26’ 3” longitude: -99° 8’ 18”

Bulgaria

latitude: 43° 0’ 0” longitude: 25° 0’ 0”

latitude: 51° 27’ 0” longitude: -2° 34’ 59”

New York City, NY, USA

Los Angeles, California San Francisco, California

Greenland

latitude: 72° 0’ 0” longitude: -40° 0’ 0”

London, United Kingdom latitude: 51° 30’ 0” longitude: -0° 7’ 0”

Phillipines

latitude: 13° 0’ 0” longitude: 13° 0’ 0”

Wakra, Qatar, UAE latitude: 25° 10’ 4” longitude: 51° 36’ 24”

Sicily, Italy

latitude: 37° 30’ 0” longitude: 14° 0’ 0”

Brazil latitude: -10° 0’ 0” longitude: -55° 0’ 0” New Zealand

Venice, Italy

latitude: 45° 26’ 18” longitude: 12° 19’ 36”

latitude: -41° 18’ 0” longitude: 174° 48’ 0”

South Carolina, USA Miami, Florida

latitude: 25° 46’ 27” longitude: -80° 11’ 37”

Hawaii, USA

latitude: 33° 22’ 44” longitude: -79° 45’ 35”

latitude: 21° 18’ 11” longitude: -157° 49’ 18”

Manhattan, New York, USA

Hamburg, Germany

latitude: 40° 42’ 51” longitude: -74° 0’ 21”

Long Island,NY, USA

Phillipines

Miami, FL, USA latitude: 43° 9’ 7” longitude: -76° 3’ 39” latitude: 25° 46’ 27” longitude: -80° 11’ 37”

latitude: 13° 0’ 0” longitude: 13° 0’ 0”

Massachusetts, USA latitude: 41° 44’ 22” longitude: -70° 37’ 26”

Brazil latitude: -10° 0’ 0” longitude: -55° 0’ 0”

Jacksonville, FL, USA latitude: 30° 19’ 55” longitude: -81° 39’ 20”

Bogota, Columbia latitude: 10° 24’ 0” longitude: -75° 16’ 59”

Panama City, Panama

Rome, Italy

latitude: 53° 37’ 59” longitude: 10° 0’ 0”

latitude: 8° 58’ 0” longitude: -79° 31’ 59”

latitude: 41° 54’ 0” longitude: 12° 28’ 59”

Denmark

latitude: 57° 22’ 0” longitude: 10° 15’ 0”

Sri Lanka, Sri Lanka latitude: 7° 30’ 0” longitude: 80° 30’ 0”

Phillipines

latitude: 13° 0’ 0” longitude: 13° 0’ 0”

Denmark

Rome, Italy

latitude: 57° 3’ 0” longitude: 9° 55’ 59”

latitude: 41° 54’ 0” longitude: 12° 28’ 59”

United Kingdom latitude: 51° 46’ 59” longitude: 1° 10’ 0”

Phillipines

latitude: 13° 0’ 0” longitude: 13° 0’ 0”

Shanghai, China

latitude: 31° 6’ 33” longitude: 121° 22’ 5”

Rome, Italy

latitude: 41° 54’ 0” longitude: 12° 28’ 59”

Paris, France

latitude: 48° 52’ 0” longitude: 2° 19’ 59”

Valencia, Spain

Berlin, Germany

latitude: 43° 12’ 0” longitude: -8° 49’ 0”

latitude: 52° 31’ 0” longitude: 13° 24’ 0”

Mumbai, India latitude: 18° 58’ 30” longitude: 72° 49’ 32”

Metz, France

latitude: 47° 24’ 0” longitude: 3° 37’ 59”

Mumbai, India latitude: 18° 58’ 30” longitude: 72° 49’ 32”

Madrid, Spain

latitude: 40° 24’ 0” longitude: -3° 40’ 59”

Perth, Australia

latitude: -41° 34’ 0” longitude: 147° 10’ 0”

Denpasar, Bali

latitude: -8° 39’ 0” longitude: 115° 13’ 0”

Aizawl, India

latitude: 23° 43’ 59” longitude: 92° 43’ 0”

Sydney, Australia

latitude: -33° 52’ 59” longitude: 151° 13’ 0”

Krabi,Thailand latitude: 8° 4’ 0” longitude: 98° 55’ 0”

mapping triggers and locations

Sunset Boulevard ‘Trigger’ Diagram_ Offspring are labeled accoding to distance from the point of origin: Sunset Blvd.



Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.