REFERENCES Alexander RJ (2008) Education for All, the Quality Imperative and the Problem of Pedagogy. Create Pathways To Access, Research Monograph No 20 http://www.createrpc.org/publications/
Billett, S. (2003). Vocational curriculum and pedagogy: an activity theory perspective. European Educational Research Journal, 2, 6–21. Black, P. & Dylan, W. (1998). Assessment and Classroom Learning, Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5:1, 7-74. Board of Studies, Teaching and Educational Standards NSW (n.d.). Assessment For, As and Of Learning. Retrieved October 10, 2015, from: http://syllabus.bos.nsw.edu.au/supportmaterials/assessment-for-as-and-of-learning/ Bound, H., & Lin, M. (2011). Singapore Workforce Skills Qualifications (WSQ), Workplace Learning and Assessment (Stage II). Singapore: Institute for Adult Learning. Retrieved October 11, 2015, from: https://www.ial.edu.sg/files/documents/398/WSQ%20Workplace%20Learning%20and%20Ass essment%20Stage%20II.pdf
Bound, H., Rushbrook, P., & Sivalingam, M. (2013). What is Quality Curriculum? Singapore: Institute for Adult Learning. Brookfield, S. (1995). Becoming a Critically Reflective Teacher. San-Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Bruner, J. S. (1968). Towards a Theory of Instruction. New York: W. W. Norton. Cedefop (2010). Learning Outcomes Approaches in VET Curricula. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Choy, M. (2013). The iTEaCH Implementation Model: adopting a best-fit approach to implementing ICT in schools. Educational Media International, 50, 281–290. Cornford, I. R. (1999). Rediscovering the importance of learning and curriculum in vocational education and training in Australia. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 51, 93–116. Demirci, A. (2009). How do teachers approach new technologies: Geogrpahy teachers attitudes towards geographic information systems (GIS). European Journal of Educational Studies, 1(1) 43-53. Doll, W. (1993). A postmodern perspective on curriculum. New York: Teachers College Press..
Doll, W. (2004). The Fours R’s – an alternative to the Tyler rationale. In D. Flinders, & S. Thornton (Eds.), The Curriculum Studies Reader (2nd edn). New York: Routledge Falmer.
69
