REFERENCES

Alexander RJ (2008) Education for All, the Quality Imperative and the Problem of Pedagogy. Create Pathways To Access, Research Monograph No 20 http://www.createrpc.org/publications/

Billett, S. (2003). Vocational curriculum and pedagogy: an activity theory perspective. European Educational Research Journal, 2, 6–21.

Black, P. & Dylan, W. (1998). Assessment and Classroom Learning, Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5:1, 7-74.

Board of Studies, Teaching and Educational Standards NSW (n.d.). Assessment For, As and Of Learning. Retrieved October 10, 2015, from: http://syllabus.bos.nsw.edu.au/supportmaterials/assessment-for-as-and-of-learning/

Bound, H., & Lin, M. (2011). Singapore Workforce Skills Qualifications (WSQ), Workplace Learning and Assessment (Stage II). Singapore: Institute for Adult Learning. Retrieved October 11, 2015, from: https://www.ial.edu.sg/files/documents/398/WSQ%20Workplace%20Learning%20and%20Ass essment%20Stage%20II.pdf

Bound, H., Rushbrook, P., & Sivalingam, M. (2013). What is Quality Curriculum? Singapore: Institute for Adult Learning.

Brookfield, S. (1995). Becoming a Critically Reflective Teacher. San-Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Bruner, J. S. (1968). Towards a Theory of Instruction. New York: W. W. Norton.

Cedefop (2010). Learning Outcomes Approaches in VET Curricula. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

Choy, M. (2013). The iTEaCH Implementation Model: adopting a best-fit approach to implementing ICT in schools. Educational Media International, 50, 281–290.

Cornford, I. R. (1999). Rediscovering the importance of learning and curriculum in vocational education and training in Australia. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 51, 93–116.

Demirci, A. (2009). How do teachers approach new technologies: Geogrpahy teachers attitudes towards geographic information systems (GIS). European Journal of Educational Studies, 1(1) 43-53.

Doll, W. (1993). A postmodern perspective on curriculum. New York: Teachers College Press..

Doll, W. (2004). The Fours R’s – an alternative to the Tyler rationale. In D. Flinders, & S. Thornton (Eds.), The Curriculum Studies Reader (2nd edn). New York: Routledge Falmer.

Dumont, H., Istance, D., & Benavides, F. (2010). The Nature of Learning: Using Research to Inspire Practice. OECD Centre for Educational Research and Innovation. Retrieved October 11, 2015, from: http://www.educ.ethz.ch/pro/litll/oecdbuch.pdf

Fraser, S., & Bosanquet, A. (2006). The curriculum? That’s just a unit outline is not it? Studies in Higher Education, 31, 369–381.

Freire, P. (1972). Pedagogy of the Oppresed. London : Penguin Books.

Goodson, I. (1997). The Changing Curriculum: Studies in Social Construction. New York: P. Lang.

Goodyear, P., & Ellis, R. (2007). Students’ interpretations of learning tasks: implications for educational design. Paper presented at the ASCILITE conference: ICT: Providing choices for learners and learning, Singapore. Retrieved October 11, 2015, from: http://www.researchgate.net/publication/215615184_Students_interpretations_of_learn ing_tasks_implications_for_educational_design

Grundy, S. (1987). Curriculum: Product or Praxis. London: The Falmer Press.

Hamilton, D., & Weiner, G. (2003). Subjects, not subjects: curriculum pathways, pedagogies and practices in the United Kingdom. In W. Pinar (Ed.), International Handbook of Curriculum Research (pp. 623–636). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Hökkä, P., Eteläpelto, A. & Rasku-Puttonen, H. (2010). Recent tensions and challenges in teacher education as manifested in curriculum discourse. Teaching and Teacher Education, 269$) 845853.

Jonnaert, P., Masciotra, D., Barrette, J., Morel, D., & Mane, Y. (2007). From competence in curriculum to competence in action. Applied Linguistics, 37, 187–203.

Larson, B. M., & Lockee, B. B. (2009). Preparing instructional designers for different career environments: a case study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 57, 1–24.

Lee, Y. J. (2015). Theory and practice dialectics in the workplace. In H. Bound, & P. Rushbrook (Eds.), Towards a New Understanding of Workplace Learning: The Context of Singapore (pp. 74–87). Singapore: Institute for Adult Learning.

LeNoue, M. (2011). Adult education and the social media revolution. Adult Learning, 22, 4–12.

Malnarich, G. & Lardner, D.; Co-Directors, Washington Center (2003). Designing Integrated Learning for Students: A Heuristic for Teaching, Assessment and Curriculum Design. Washington Centre Occasional Paper. Retrieved October 07, 2015, from: http://evergreen.edu/washingtoncenter/docs/intlearning/intdesignoccasionalpaper.pdf

Mayer, R. E. (2005). The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.

McGrail, E. (2005). Teachers, technology, and change: English teachers’ perspectives. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13, 5–24.

McKay, M. (2009). Western Guide to Curriculum Review. Retrieved October 10, 2015, from: https://www.uwo.ca/tsc/resources/pdf/PG_4_Curriculum.pdf

Neal, B. (2011). Strategic planning for the instructional designer. T+D, 65, 76–77.

Nikto, A. & Brookhart, S. (2007). Educational assessment of students. Pearson Merrill prentice Hall.

Parker, J. (2003). Reconceptualising the curriculum: from commodification to transformation. Teaching in Higher Education, 8 (4), 529–543.

Posner, G. (1995). Analysing the Curriculum. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Rule, I. A. C. (1973). A philosophical inquiry into the meaning(s) of “curriculum” . Doctoral thesis at New York University.

Rushbrook, P., Bound, H., & Sivalingam, M. (2013a). The visible and invisible in work and learning. Paper presented at the International Conference on Researching Work and Learning (RWL 8), University of Stirling, Scotland.

Rutherford-Hemming, T. (2012). Simulation methodology in nursing education and adult learning theory. Adult Learning, 23, 129–137.

Säljö, R. (2008). Epilogue: From transfer to boundary-crossing. In T. Tuomi-Gröhm, & Y. Engeström (Eds.). Between School and Work: New Perspectives on Transfer and Boundary-Crossing (pp. 311–322). Bingley, UK: European Association for Learning and Instruction and Emerald.

Schwartz, M. (2006). For whom do we write the curriculum? Journal of Curriculum Studies, 38, 449–457.

Sharif, A., & Cho, S. (2015). 21st-century instructional designers: bridging the perceptual gaps between identity, practice, impact and professional development. RUSC. Universities and Knowledge Society Journal, 12, 72–85.

Sheehan, M. D, & Johnson, R. B. (2012). Philosophical and methodological beliefs of instructional design faculty and professionals. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60, 131–153.

Slattery, P. (1995). Curriculum Development in the Postmodern Era. New York: Garland Publishing.

Smith, R. Killen, C., & Knight, S. (2013). Using technology to improve curriculum design: developing an agile and responsive curriculum to meet the diverse needs of students and employers in the 21st century. Retrieved October 10, 2015, from: https://www.jisc.ac.uk/guides/usingtechnology-to-improve-curriculum-design

Smith, R. Killen, C., & Knight, S. (2015). How can I keep the curriculum relevant in a time of rapid change? Retrieved October 10, 2015, from: https://www.jisc.ac.uk/guides/how-can-i-keepthe-curriculum-relevant-in-a-time-of-rapid-change

Stack, S. (2007). Integrating science and soul in education: The lived experience of a science educator bringing Holistic and Integral perspectives to the transformation of science teaching. Retrieved March 10, 2016, from: http://www.stack.bigpondhosting.com/thesis/

Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (2nd edn). London: Sage Publications.

Soine, R. (2003). Framework for learning design. Techniques, 78, 38–41.

Stenhouse, L. (1975). An Introduction to Curriculum Research and Development. London: Heinemann Educational.

Tapscott, D. (2009). Grown up Digital. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Tyler, R. (1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Wells, J. G. (2007). Key design factors in durable instructional technology professional development. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 15, 101–122.