Mountain View Wesleyan Mats Page 7
The Home News Your Local News
JANUARY 25-31, 2018
Only 50 cents!
Northampton Borough Council Tables rental ordinance
By JUSTIN SWEITZER After mixed reactions from the public following a special hearing, Northampton Borough Council decided to table an ordinance pertaining to rental properties and housing occupancy at their Jan. 18 meeting. The ordinance, which was subject to a special public hear-
ing prior to the beginning of council’s regularly scheduled meeting, faced opposition from landlords and support from others as council looks to establish the legislation that they believe will improve the public health and safety for borough residents. The ordinance would require
Looking by Back Ed Pany Carnegie Organ Originally published in 2005
Andrew Carnegie was born in Dunferline, Scotland in 1835. Emigrating to the U.S. in 1835, the industrious young man who lacked a high school education started his meteoric career as a telegrapher for the Pennsylvania Railroad. He introduced steel rails to the railroads revolutionizing the steel industry with the Bessemer process. Famously wealthy, he donated millions of dollars to education, libraries and many projects including church organs. Mrs. Grace Bonser shared a program from Christ Reformed Church in Bath dated December 1, 1912. A special service
was held to dedicate “The Andrew Carnegie Organ.” The Reformed Church was built on Chestnut Street in 1876. The pastor was Rev. Martin Smith and the congregation was a part of the NazarethHecktown-Bath charge. The membership consisted of 200 worshippers. In 1898 the pastor was Rev. W. U. Hefferich and the deacons in 1912 were John Sencenbach, Robert F. Silfies, James Bartholomew and William Landis. It was quite interesting to find that Andrew Carnegie’s name and generosity found the road to a church in Bath many years ago.
owners of rental units to apply for residential rental licenses for each unit owned. If passed, owners would be required to obtain a license through submission of an application along with applicable fees. In addition, the ordinance would require separate inspections for each rental unit owned for a residential rental license to be issued. Joan Marinkovits, an owner of rental units in the borough, said the new ordinance would be too costly to borough residents and rental unit owners. “I think inspection is a good idea, but I think we need something with more reasonable costs,” she said. “All this money is looking like it’s going to pay someone’s salary. We don’t need that, not in a town this size.” Jeff Odenwelder was another resident and owner who was concerned about costs the ordinance would impose, saying that landlords would have to forward the new costs onto their tenants, with other landlords in attendance agreeing with his statement. “If you’re going to start charging us, we’re going to pass it along,” Odenwelder said. “If you charge me to inspect it, I would charge them, I would tack it on.” Odenwelder said that the borough should not pass an allencompassing ordinance to fix problems caused by a few bad landlords. “I’m not against going after
scumlords, and there are scumlords in the borough,” he said. “I say throw the book at them, but don’t make every good other landlord here pay for a handful of them.” Odenwelder, particularly referring to Section 8 housing, said the units get inspected every year by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. He said both Northampton County and Northampton Borough are now attempting to impose additional inspections on top of HUD inspections. Councilman Robert McHale said that the borough should consider using the inspection documents provided by HUD to exempt already-inspected units. “Maybe we need to look at that as part of the inspection… maybe that suffices then,” McHale said. Councilman Anthony Lopsonzski said that while some landlords think the ordinance is a “money grab,” the ordinance would be self-sustaining to pay for the costs it would impose. “This program is designed to fund itself,” Lopsonzski said. After receiving constructive and detailed feedback from residents, the board decided the best option was to table the ordinance. McHale said the board received “excellent” comments from the public. Lopsonzski agreed and said Continued on page 9
Dr. Clearie Page 3
50 Years in D.A.R.
Page 8
Andy’s Corner Page 10
77th Year, Issue No. 4 www.homenewspa.com
USPS 248-700