ICAO Annex 04 10th edition supplement March 02

28/3/02

Transmittal Note

SUPPLEMENT TO

ANNEX 4 — AERONAUTICAL CHARTS

(Tenth Edition)

1.

The attached Supplement supersedes all previous Supplements to Annex 4 and includes differences notified by Contracting States up to 28 March 2002 with respect to all amendments up to and including Amendment 52.

2.

This Supplement should be inserted at the end of Annex 4 (Tenth Edition). Additional differences received from Contracting States will be issued at intervals as amendments to this Supplement.

SUPPLEMENT TO ANNEX 4 — TENTH EDITION

AERONAUTICAL CHARTS Differences between the national regulations and practices of Contracting States and the corresponding International Standards and Recommended Practices contained in Annex 4, as notified to ICAO in accordance with Article 38 of the Convention on International Civil Aviation and the Council’s resolution of 21 November 1950.

MARCH 2002 I N T E R N AT I O N A L

CIVIL

AV I AT I O N

O R G A N I Z AT I O N

(ii)

SUPPLEMENT TO ANNEX 4 (TENTH EDITION)

RECORD OF AMENDMENTS No.

Date

Entered by

No.

Date

Entered by

AMENDMENTS TO ANNEX 4 ADOPTED OR APPROVED BY THE COUNCIL SUBSEQUENT TO THE TENTH EDITION ISSUED JULY 2001

No.

28/3/02

Date of adoption or approval

Date applicable

No.

Date of adoption or approval

Date applicable

SUPPLEMENT TO ANNEX 4 (TENTH EDITION) 1.

(iii)

Contracting States which have notified ICAO of differences

The Contracting States listed below have notified ICAO of differences which exist between their national regulations and practices and the International Standards and Recommended Practices of Annex 4 (Tenth Edition) up to an including Amendment 52, or have commented on implementation.

The page numbers shown for each State and the dates of publication of those pages correspond to the actual pages in this Supplement.

State Argentina Australia Canada China (Hong Kong SAR) Cuba Denmark Ecuador France Germany India Lithuania Mauritius New Zealand Norway Panama Slovakia Sweden Uganda Uruguay

2.

Date of notification

Pages in Supplement

Date of publication

28/9/01 27/2/02 10/10/01 28/9/01 30/7/01 24/9/01 21/6/01 5/10/01 14/9/01 3/9/01 6/6/01 18/1/02 13/3/02 1/10/01 9/7/01 26/9/01 21/9/01 25/5/01 27/9/01

1-4 1-3 1-3 1 1-2 1 1 1-6 1-4 1 1 1 1-3 1-2 1 1 1 1 1

28/3/02 28/3/02 28/3/02 28/3/02 28/3/02 28/3/02 28/3/02 28/3/02 28/3/02 28/3/02 28/3/02 28/3/02 28/3/02 28/3/02 28/3/02 28/3/02 28/3/02 28/3/02 28/3/02

Contracting States which have notified ICAO that no differences exist

State Bahrain Barbados Egypt El Salvador Eritrea Finland Ghana Jordan Kuwait Netherlands Pakistan

Date of notification 14/7/01 9/5/01 14/7/01 9/7/01 14/5/01 11/9/01 12/6/01 1/10/01 10/6/01 22/10/01 26/9/01

State Paraguay Portugal Romania Sri Lanka The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia Togo United Arab Emirates United Republic of Tanzania Zimbabwe

Date of notification 24/8/01 12/10/01 5/10/01 12/2/01 29/6/01 1/7/01 9/9/01 21/6/01 17/9/01

28/3/02

(iv) 3.

SUPPLEMENT TO ANNEX 4 (TENTH EDITION) Contracting States from which no information has been received

Afghanistan Albania Algeria Andorra Angola Antigua and Barbuda Armenia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bangladesh Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bhutan Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Brazil Brunei Darussalam Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Cape Verde Central African Republic Chad Chile China Colombia Comoros Congo Cook Islands Costa Rica Côte d’Ivoire Croatia Cyprus Czech Republic Democratic People’s Republic of Korea Democratic Republic of the Congo Djibouti Dominican Republic Equatorial Guinea Estonia Ethiopia Fiji Gabon Gambia 28/3/02

Georgia Greece Grenada Guatemala Guinea Guinea-Bissau Guyana Haiti Honduras Hungary Iceland Indonesia Iran (Islamic Republic of) Iraq Ireland Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Kyrgyzstan Lao People’s Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libyan Arab Jamahiriya Luxembourg Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Marshall Islands Mauritania Mexico Micronesia (Federated States of) Monaco Mongolia Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nauru Nepal Nicaragua Niger Nigeria

Oman Palau Papua New Guinea Peru Philippines Poland Qatar Republic of Korea Republic of Moldova Russian Federation Rwanda Saint Lucia Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Samoa San Marino Sao Tome and Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa Spain Sudan Suriname Swaziland Switzerland Syrian Arab Republic Tajikistan Thailand Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Ukraine United Kingdom United States Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela Viet Nam Yemen Yugoslavia Zambia

SUPPLEMENT TO ANNEX 4 (TENTH EDITION) 4.

(v)

Paragraphs with respect to which differences have been notified

Paragraph

Differences notified by

Paragraph

Differences notified by

1.1

France

4.10.1

Argentina

2.2

5.2

Canada Cuba Ecuador France India Lithuania New Zealand Norway

6.2

Canada Cuba Uganda

7.6.2

2.18.4

Argentina Australia Canada Argentina Argentina Argentina Canada Australia Canada Australia Argentina Australia Canada Denmark France Germany Sweden Germany Canada Australia Ecuador New Zealand Australia

3.2.1 3.3.2 3.8.2 3.8.2.2 3.8.4 3.9.1

Uruguay Canada France Canada France Argentina

Canada Cuba Germany New Zealand Norway Argentina Canada Argentina Australia Ecuador France New Zealand Norway Sweden Uruguay New Zealand

Chapter 4 4.2 4.2.1

Uruguay Lithuania Canada Cuba Ecuador France Germany New Zealand Uganda Argentina Argentina Argentina Argentina Argentina

2.3.1 2.3.2 2.4 2.5.4 2.5.7 2.11 2.12.3.1 2.13 2.14.1

2.17.1 2.18 2.18.2

4.4.3 4.5 4.7.3 4.8 4.9.1

7.9.1 7.9.2 7.9.3.1.1

7.9.4.2 8.2.1 8.3.2 8.6.1 8.6.2

8.9.1 8.9.2 8.9.3

Germany France Norway Australia France Germany New Zealand Norway Argentina Canada Canada France New Zealand Sweden

28/3/02

(vi)

Paragraph 8.9.4.1.1

9.3.2 9.3.3 9.4 9.4.3 9.5.4 9.6.1 9.6.2

9.6.3 9.9 9.9.2 9.9.3.2

9.9.4.1.1

10.3.3 10.4 10.4.2 10.5.4 10.6.1 10.6.2

10.9 10.9.2 10.9.3 10.9.3.1 10.9.3.2

28/3/02

SUPPLEMENT TO ANNEX 4 (TENTH EDITION) Differences notified by Argentina Australia Canada France New Zealand Norway Sweden Australia France China (Hong Kong SAR) New Zealand France Sweden Cuba France Germany India New Zealand Germany Norway China (Hong Kong SAR) Canada Canada France Germany Norway Australia France New Zealand Sweden France China (Hong Kong SAR) New Zealand France Sweden Cuba France Germany India New Zealand China (Hong Kong, SAR) Canada Sweden France Canada Germany Norway

Paragraph

Differences notified by

10.9.4.1.1

Australia France New Zealand Sweden

11.2.2 11.2.3 11.3.3

France France France New Zealand France Sweden New Zealand France New Zealand France China (Hong Kong SAR) Argentina Argentina Canada France India New Zealand Panama Uganda Cuba France France New Zealand France Canada France Australia France New Zealand Norway France Canada France Argentina France Australia France New Zealand Germany New Zealand Germany Australia France

11.3.3.1 11.5.2 11.6.1 11.6.2 11.6.5 11.7 11.7.1 11.7.2

11.10.1.1 11.10.1.3 11.10.1.4 11.10.2.4 11.10.2.5 11.10.3 11.10.4.1 11.10.4.3

11.10.4.4 11.10.6.1 11.10.6.3 11.10.6.4 11.10.6.5 11.10.7.1 11.10.8.1 11.10.8.2 11.10.8.4

SUPPLEMENT TO ANNEX 4 (TENTH EDITION)

Paragraph 11.10.8.5

11.10.8.6 11.10.9

12.2 12.4 12.6 12.10.1.1 12.10.2.3 12.10.3 12.10.4 12.10.5.3

13.1 13.2.1 13.5

13.6.1

13.6.2

Differences notified by Argentina France New Zealand France Australia France New Zealand Panama France Germany France Cuba New Zealand Canada France France Germany New Zealand Australia Norway France Germany New Zealand Australia Canada Ecuador France Germany New Zealand Norway New Zealand

(vii)

Paragraph 15.6

Australia Canada France Germany Norway

Chapter 16 16.2 16.2.1

Panama Lithuania Argentina France Germany Norway Australia Canada Cuba Argentina Cuba Argentina Canada Australia Australia Cuba Australia France Australia Cuba Argentina Australia Canada Argentina France Australia

16.4.6 16.5.1 16.5.2 16.6 16.7.5 16.7.9.3 16.7.10.2 16.9.2 16.9.2.2 16.9.2.3 16.9.3.1 16.9.4 16.9.5 16.9.5.1 17.2

14.2 14.3.2 14.5.2

14.6

15.5.2

Cuba New Zealand France Germany New Zealand Canada France Germany New Zealand Norway

Differences notified by

17.4.4 17.4.5 17.6 17.7.4 17.7.7.1 17.7.9.2 17.7.9.3 17.9.2

Argentina Cuba Mauritius Uganda Australia Australia Argentina Germany Germany France Australia France

Australia France Germany

28/3/02

(viii)

Paragraph

SUPPLEMENT TO ANNEX 4 (TENTH EDITION) Differences notified by

Paragraph

Differences notified by

17.9.2.2

Argentina Australia France Germany

19.2

17.9.3.1 17.9.4 17.9.5

Argentina Canada Argentina France

Chapter 20

Canada Cuba France Germany Lithuania

Appendix 2

Argentina France Germany

Appendix 6

Germany

18.2

28/3/02

20.2.1

Cuba Ecuador France Lithuania Slovakia Cuba India Uruguay Argentina

SUPPLEMENT TO ANNEX 4 (TENTH EDITION)

ARGENTINA 1

CHAPTER 2 2.2

Not applied in respect of the Visual Aeronautical Chart (scale: 1:1 000 000) or the Visual Aeronautical Chart for Tactical Flight (scale: 1 500 000).

Remark: These charts are produced in accordance with the specifications of the Instituto Panamericano de Geografía e Historia (IPGH).

2.3.1 and 2.3.2

Not applied in respect of the Visual Aeronautical Chart (scale: 1:1 000 000) or the Visual Aeronautical Chart for Tactical Flight (scale: 1 500 000).

Remark: These charts are produced in accordance with the specifications of the Instituto Panamericano de Geografía e Historia (IPGH).

2.4

Not applied in respect of the Visual Aeronautical Chart (scale: 1:1 000 000) or the Visual Aeronautical Chart for Tactical Flight (scale: 1 500 000). On the aeronautical navigation chart, the aerodrome symbols used are similar to those used on the 1:500 000 and 1:1 000 000 charts.

Remark: These charts are produced in accordance with the specifications of the Instituto Panamericano de Geografía e Historia (IPGH).

2.12.3.1

Not applied in respect of the Visual Aeronautical Chart (scale: 1:1 000 000) or the Visual Aeronautical Chart for Tactical Flight (scale: 1 500 000).

Remark: These charts are produced in accordance with the specifications of the Instituto Panamericano de Geografía e Historia (IPGH).

CHAPTER 3 3.9.1

Not indicated.

CHAPTER 4 4.4.3

The scale in feet is not provided.

4.5 c)

Not indicated.

4.7.3

All significant objects are shown, even if they are not obstacles.

4.8

The compass rose is orientated to the Magnetic North.

4.9.1 a)

Not indicated.

m)

n)

Not determined.

1)

No symbols used.

2)

Height with respect to runway threshold indicated.

4)

Not applied.

Not indicated.

28/3/02

2 ARGENTINA 4.10.1

SUPPLEMENT TO ANNEX 4 (TENTH EDITION) The order of accuracy is not shown.

CHAPTER 7 7.9.1

Remark: Domestic aerodromes with paved runways are also shown: 1) as paved runways when not equipped with VOR/NDB; 2) if the aerodrome is equipped with VOR or NDB, only the radio aid is specified. The aerodrome symbols used are similar to those used on the 1:500 000 and 1:1 000 000 charts (specifications of the Instituto Panamericano de Geografía e Historia).

7.9.3.1.1 9)

VOR change-over points are not indicated.

CHAPTER 8 8.9.1

Remark: Domestic aerodromes with paved runways are also shown: 1) as paved runways when not equipped with VOR/NDB; 2) if the aerodrome is equipped with VOR or NDB, only the radio aid is specified. The aerodrome symbols used are similar to those used on the 1:500 000 and 1:1 000 000 charts (specifications of the Instituto Panamericano de Geografía e Historia).

8.9.4.1.1 1)

These data are currently expressed in degrees, minutes and tenths of minutes.

5)

Holding patterns are not included.

10)

VOR change-over points are not included.

CHAPTER 11 11.7.1

Topographic information is provided only when it is available.

11.7.2

Argentina does not produce instrument approach charts in colour.

11.10.6.3 i)

This is represented by a complete line, but the latter is not drawn to scale.

11.10.8.5

Not applied.

Remark: Application of this provision would require redrafting of all publications dealing with this subject.

CHAPTER 16 16.2.1

Argentina produces the Argentine Aeronautical Chart series (CAA — Carta Aeronáutica Argentina) (scale: 1:1 000 000).

Remark: These charts are produced in accordance with the specifications of the Instituto Panamericano de Geografía e Historia (IPGH).

16.5.2

Not applied.

Remark: These charts are produced in accordance with the specifications of the Instituto Panamericano de Geografía e Historia (IPGH).

28/3/02

SUPPLEMENT TO ANNEX 4 (TENTH EDITION) 16.6

ARGENTINA 3

Not applied.

Remark: These charts are produced in accordance with the specifications of the Instituto Panamericano de Geografía e Historia (IPGH).

16.9.3.1

Not applied.

Remark: These charts are produced in accordance with the specifications of the Instituto Panamericano de Geografía e Historia (IPGH).

16.9.5

Not applied.

Remark: These charts are produced in accordance with the specifications of the Instituto Panamericano de Geografía e Historia (IPGH).

CHAPTER 17 17.2*

Not applied.

Remark: Argentina produces the Argentine Tactical Aeronautical Chart series (CAAT — Carta Aeronáutica Argentina Táctica) (scale: 1:500 000). These charts are produced in accordance with the specifications of the Instituto Panamericano de Geografía e Historia (IPGH).

17.6

Not applied.

Remark: These charts are produced in accordance with the specifications of the Instituto Panamericano de Geografía e Historia (IPGH).

17.9.2.2

Not applied.

Remark: These charts are produced in accordance with the specifications of the Instituto Panamericano de Geografía e Historia (IPGH).

17.9.3.1

Not applied.

Remark: These charts are produced in accordance with the specifications of the Instituto Panamericano de Geografía e Historia (IPGH).

17.9.5

Not applied.

Remark: These charts are produced in accordance with the specifications of the Instituto Panamericano de Geografía e Historia (IPGH).

CHAPTER 20 20.2.1

Not applied.

*Recommended Practice 28/3/02

4 ARGENTINA Appendix 2

SUPPLEMENT TO ANNEX 4 (TENTH EDITION) For the 1:500 000 and 1:1 000 000 charts, the symbols of the Instituto Panamericano de Geografía e Historia are used. The aerodrome symbols used are similar to those used on the 1:500 000 and 1:1 000 000 charts (specifications of the Instituto Panamericano de Geografía e Historia). Some different symbols are used on IAC, SID and STAR charts.

Remark: For the IAC, SID and STAR charts, adoption of the proposed symbols would require correction of all existing charts.

28/3/02

SUPPLEMENT TO ANNEX 4 (TENTH EDITION)

AUSTRALIA 1

CHAPTER 2 2.2

Australian charts carry a title to describe their function. Not all charts are titled to conform to the Annex.

Functional descriptions are considered more appropriate for Australia.

2.5.7

Comply in part. The conversion scale is shown for the hypsometric tint scale on all visual charts. The kilometre/NM scale is shown on all visual charts. The metres/feet scale is being progressively included on all Visual Navigation Charts (VNCs) and Visual Terminal Charts (VTCs). This Standard is being progressively applied.

2.11*

Conform in all colours with the exception that inland waters on Australian charts are coloured green instead of blue. Preferred by pilots.

2.12.3.1

Spot heights of doubtful accuracy are currently shown in brackets. Compliance with ICAO will be actioned on an “opportunity� basis with each chart revision. Compliance pending.

2.18.2

Partial compliance. Geoid undulations are not published in Australia. Geoid undulation data are not available.

2.18.4

Partial compliance. The order of resolution of coordinates are as specified (database archives); however, geoid undulations are not implemented (see remarks for paragraph 2.18.2 above). Geoid undulation data not available.

CHAPTER 7 7.9.3.1.1

This information is in Enroute Supplement Australia Facilities (ERSA FAC). Not applicable.

CHAPTER 8 8.6.2*

The recommendation has very limited application in Australia and does not warrant its introduction.

Alternative measures are in place to ensure that an equivalent level of safety is being achieved.

8.9.4.1.1

This is not shown on Terminal Area Charts (TACs), but is shown in ERSA FAC. Preferred by pilots.

CHAPTER 9 9.3.2*

Australian SIDs are not drawn to scale. Not practicable for Australia.

9.9.4.1.1 1) e)

Minimum flight altitudes are not shown on SID routes or route segments. Not required.

2) b)

This information is in ERSA FAC. Preferred by pilots.

d)

The coordinates are in ERSA FAC. Preferred by pilots.

5)

Transition altitude/height is not shown on SID. SIDs terminate before the transition altitude is attained.

*Recommended Practice 28/3/02

2 AUSTRALIA

SUPPLEMENT TO ANNEX 4 (TENTH EDITION)

CHAPTER 10 10.9.4.1.1 1) a)

Plain language name is in the title. Pilots prefer that this information be contained in ERSA rather than on the chart.

d)

Contained in ERSA.

e)

Contained in ERSA.

5)

Transition altitude is not shown on Australian STARs. STARS generally terminate before the transition altitude is reached.

CHAPTER 11 11.10.4.3*

Partial compliance. Australia shows such points in degrees, minutes and tenths of minutes. Australia’s Safety Authority (CASA) requires this data to be given in degrees/minutes/and tenths of a minute.

11.10.6.4*

Partial compliance. IAL heights required by the procedure are underlined in lieu of parentheses.

Underlining has become the accepted preference and will be retained.

11.10.8.4*

Australia does not include a rate of descent table on IAL charts. Not considered necessary.

11.10.9

This data is held in an electronic database, but is not published on the chart. Not considered necessary.

CHAPTER 13 13.1

Shown by Departure and Approach Procedure (DAP) Aerodrome (AD) Charts. Not considered necessary.

13.1 a)

Australian helicopter requirements are contained in ERSA FAC for each international aerodrome. Pilots prefer that this information be included in ERSA FAC.

13.6.1 a)

Coordinates are in degrees, minutes and tenths of a minute. CASA requirement.

c)

Only RWY end elevations are shown. Geoid undulation data not available.

d)

Partial compliance. Type of surface, bearing strengths, displaced thresholds and RWY markings are contained in ERSA. ERSA is the preferred repository for this data.

h)

Not shown on Australian AD charts. Not relevant to Australia.

CHAPTER 15 15.5.2*

Magnetic variation to the nearest degree is shown, but not the annual change. Annual change not considered necessary.

15.6 b)

Comply in part — visual guidance docking systems are not shown. Not considered necessary.

*Recommended Practice 28/3/02

SUPPLEMENT TO ANNEX 4 (TENTH EDITION) c)

All coordinates are in degrees, minutes and tenths of a minute. CASA requirement.

f)

Not shown on DAP AD charts. Not considered necessary.

g)

Not shown on DAP AD charts. Not considered necessary.

AUSTRALIA 3

CHAPTER 16 16.4.6*

Australian WACs follow the overlap criteria in critical areas of map coverage, but, in general, WAC coverage ceases at the neat line. Traditional depiction is to the neat line only.

16.7.5

International boundaries are being progressively included on WACs.

16.7.9.3*

Australian WACs do not accord with this recommendation. Not considered necessary.

16.7.10.2

A warning note is included on WACs. All charts are progressively becoming compliant.

16.9.2.2

This information is shown in ERSA. Only the aerodrome type, by symbol and its name, are shown. The ERSA presentation is preferred by pilots.

16.9.4

Prohibited, restricted and danger areas are not shown on WACs. These areas are shown on Enroute Charts (ERCs) and VNCs in lieu.

16.9.5.1

Elements of Australia’s air traffic services system are not shown on WACs. Not included because of the prohibitive costs in updating this information.

CHAPTER 17 17.4.4*

The VNCs approximate, but are not quarter sheets of the WAC coverage of the same areas. Required coverage of VTCs makes such a recommendation impracticable.

17.4.5*

Recommended overlaps are impracticable.

17.7.9.3*

Australian VNCs do not accord with this recommendation. Not considered necessary.

17.9.2.2

AD data are not shown on VNCs. These data are shown in ERSA in lieu.

*Recommended Practice 28/3/02

SUPPLEMENT TO ANNEX 4 (TENTH EDITION)

CANADA 1

CHAPTER 2 2.2

The Area Chart (Annex 4, Chapter 8) is identified as the Terminal Area Chart.

The Aerodrome Ground Movement Chart (Annex 4, Chapter 14) is identified as the TAXI Chart.

The Aircraft Parking/Docking Chart (Annex 4, Chapter 15) is identified as Parking Areas.

2.5.4

Linear dimensions are shown in feet.

2.5.7

A conversion scale (metres/feet) is not provided for each chart on which elevations or altitudes are shown.

2.13

In Canada, restricted, danger and advisory areas apply.

2.18

Remark: Canada uses the North American Datum 1983 (NAD 83) as a geodetic reference datum. NAD 83 is equivalent to the World Geodetic System — 1984 (WSG-84) for aeronautical purposes.

CHAPTER 3 3.3.2

Linear dimensions are shown in feet, but there is no conversion scale to metres.

3.8.2.2

It is not proposed to include such information on the charts at this time. Should an operational requirement for this information develop in the future, the implementation will be reported prior to publication.

CHAPTER 4 4.2.1*

The Aerodrome Obstacle Chart — ICAO Type B is not produced.

CHAPTER 5 5.2

The Aerodrome Obstacle Chart — ICAO Type C is not produced.

CHAPTER 6 6.2

The Precision Approach Terrain Chart — ICAO is not produced. However, “Terrain Profile View” are provided on CAT II and III Instrument Approach Charts.

CHAPTER 7 7.6.2

Area minimum altitudes are not published. However, Geographic Area Safe Altitudes (GASA) are used which provide 2 000 feet of clearance, rounded up to the next higher 100 foot increment, over known obstacles or terrain within the delineated geographic area. Implementation of AMA is expected by 18 April 2002.

7.9.2

In Canada, restricted, danger and advisory areas apply.

* Recommended Practice 28/3/02

2 CANADA

SUPPLEMENT TO ANNEX 4 (TENTH EDITION)

CHAPTER 8 8.9.2

In Canada, restricted, danger and advisory areas apply.

8.9.3

Area minimum altitudes are not published. However, Geographic Area Safe Altitudes (GASA) are used which provide 2 000 feet of clearance, rounded up to the next higher 100 foot increment, over known obstacles or terrain within the delineated geographic area. Implementation of AMA is expected by 18 April 2002.

8.9.4.1.1 2)

Not shown.

4)

Vertical or lateral limits are not indicated on Terminal Area Charts; however, they are referred to in the sheet legend.

12)

Not shown.

13)

Not shown.

CHAPTER 9 9.9.2

In Canada, restricted, danger and advisory areas apply.

9.9.3.2

Area minimum altitudes are not published.

CHAPTER 10 10.9.2

In Canada, restricted, danger and advisory areas apply.

10.9.3.2

Area minimum altitudes are not published.

CHAPTER 11 11.7.2

Implementation of relief and contours on instrument charts for aerodrome exceeding 4 000 ft above the aerodrome elevation within the coverage of the chart or 2 000 ft within 6 NM of the aerodrome reference point is expected by 18 April 2002.

11.10.3

In Canada, restricted, danger and advisory areas apply.

11.10.6.1 f)

Prohibited manoeuvring areas are indicated on the charts by an asterisk next to the circling minima with an explanation that all circling should be to the north, south, east or west of the extended runway centre line as applicable.

CHAPTER 12 12.10.3

28/3/02

In Canada, restricted, danger and advisory areas apply.

SUPPLEMENT TO ANNEX 4 (TENTH EDITION)

CANADA 3

CHAPTER 13 13.6.1 d)

Bearing strengths are not published.

j)

The boundaries of the air traffic control services are not shown on Aerodrome Charts.

l)

Not shown on Aerodrome Chart. Indicated on Approach Chart.

m)

Not shown on Aerodrome Chart. Indicated on Approach Chart.

CHAPTER 14 14.6 d) g)

Bearing strengths are not published.

Boundaries of the air traffic control services are not shown.

CHAPTER 15 15.6 a) f)

Apron elevation not shown.

Boundaries of the air traffic control services are not shown.

CHAPTER 16 16.5.1 1)

The standard parallels for each 8E band are 1E 20N south of the northern parallel and 1E 20N north of the southern parallel.

16.6

A sheet numbering system which differs from the index in Appendix 5 is used.

16.9.4

In Canada, restricted, danger and advisory areas apply.

CHAPTER 17 17.9.4

In Canada, restricted, danger and advisory areas apply.

CHAPTER 18 18.2*

The Aeronautical Navigation Chart — ICAO Small Scale is not produced.

* Recommended Practice 28/3/02

SUPPLEMENT TO ANNEX 4 (TENTH EDITION)

CHINA (HONG KONG SAR) 1

CHAPTER 9 9.4

Format of the updated chart is based on schematic diagram only. To provide greater clarity of SID information, withdrawal of this difference is not considered for the time being.

9.9

Some aeronautical data not indicated on the updated chart. Information available in text. To provide greater clarity of SID information, withdrawal of this difference is not considered for the time being.

CHAPTER 10 10.4

Format of the updated chart is based on schematic diagram only. To provide greater clarity of STAR information, withdrawal of this difference is not considered for the time being.

10.9

Some aeronautical data not indicated on the updated chart. Information available in text. To provide greater clarity of STAR information, withdrawal of this difference is not considered for the time being.

CHAPTER 11 11.7

Topography not indicated by use of smoothed contour lines. Topography indicated by use of area minimum altitude envelope. Work to achieve full compliance with the requirement is under way.

28/3/02

SUPPLEMENT TO ANNEX 4 (TENTH EDITION)

CUBA 1

CHAPTER 4 4.2.1*

The Aerodrome Obstacle Chart — ICAO Type B is not produced.

CHAPTER 5 5.2

The Aerodrome Obstacle Chart — ICAO Type C is not produced.

CHAPTER 6 6.2

The Precision Approach Terrain Chart — ICAO is not produced.

CHAPTER 7 7.6.2

The area minimum altitude is not shown.

CHAPTER 9 9.6.2*

Smoothed contour lines are not used.

CHAPTER 10 10.6.2*

Smoothed contour lines are not used.

CHAPTER 11 11.10.1.1

All aerodromes in use in the area of the procedure in question are shown. Abandoned aerodromes are not shown.

CHAPTER 12 12.10.1.1

Abandoned aerodromes are not shown.

CHAPTER 14 14.2*

The Aerodrome Ground Movement Chart — ICAO is not produced.

CHAPTER 16 16.5.1

The standard parallels are established on 17°20N and 22°40N.

*Recommended Practice 28/3/02

2 CUBA

SUPPLEMENT TO ANNEX 4 (TENTH EDITION)

16.5.2

The distance between parallels and the interval between meridians shall be 1°. The graduations on parallels and meridians shall be 1°.

16.7.9.3*

The spot elevation of the highest point shall not be cleared of hypsometric tinting; its value shall be indicated in a box.

16.9.2.3

Abandoned aerodromes are not shown.

CHAPTER 17 17.2*

The Aeronautical Chart — ICAO 1:500 000 is not produced.

CHAPTER 18 18.2*

The Aeronautical Navigation Chart — ICAO Small Scale is not produced.

CHAPTER 19 19.2*

The Plotting Chart — ICAO is not produced.

CHAPTER 20

Not applied.

*Recommended Practice 28/3/02

SUPPLEMENT TO ANNEX 4 (TENTH EDITION)

DENMARK 1

CHAPTER 2 2.14.1

The horizontal limits of ATS airspace classes will not be depicted in accordance with Appendix 2 (by the use of the symbol number 125 — Airspace Classification).

28/3/02

SUPPLEMENT TO ANNEX 4 (TENTH EDITION)

ECUADOR 1

CHAPTER 2 2.18.2

Geoid undulation data are not published.

CHAPTER 4 4.2.1*

Aerodrome Obstacle Charts — ICAO Type B are not published.

CHAPTER 5 5.2

Aerodrome Obstacle Charts — ICAO Type C are not published.

CHAPTER 7 7.9.3.1.1

DME elevation is not published.

CHAPTER 13 13.6.1 c)

Geoid undulation is not published.

CHAPTER 19 19.2*

The Plotting Chart — ICAO is not published.

*Recommended Practice

28/3/02

SUPPLEMENT TO ANNEX 4 (TENTH EDITION)

FRANCE 1

CHAPTER 1 1.1

France publishes minimum safe altitudes with a MOC of 1500 ft. The ADIZ concept does not exist in France.

CHAPTER 2 2.14.1

The class of airspace is not indicated on the small-scale charts (cruise charts).

CHAPTER 3 3.8.2

Only a straight take-off flight path is considered when developing the chart. In the case of a standardized instrument departure path that diverges at an angle of 15E or less, the obstacle chart may extend further on the side of the turn.

3.8.4

The significant obstacles are published for an area symmetrically disposed about the runway centre line, starting 600 m from the beginning of the runway and extending to the last significant obstacle or a maximum of 10 km from the departure end of the runway (DER). The width of the area is 150 m on either side of the centre line upwind of the DER, and that width increases at a rate of 12.5 per cent on each side up to 900 m from the centre line.

CHAPTER 4 4.2.1*

Aerodrome Obstacle Charts — ICAO Type B are not produced.

CHAPTER 5 5.2

Aerodrome Obstacle Charts — ICAO Type C are not produced.

CHAPTER 7 7.9.3.1.1 1)

The geographical coordinates of the radio navigation aids are not shown on the low-level cruise charts; they are published in a separate document attached to the chart. The plain-language names of radio navigation aids are not indicated on the cruise charts.

2)

The elevation of the DME antenna is not shown. The information is available in the AIP.

3)

The lateral and vertical limits as well as the classes of airspace represented are not shown.

4)

France has not defined RNP routes. The required navigation performance is defined in AIP France (GEN 1.5).

5)

The geographical coordinates of significant points not corresponding to the position of a radio navigation aid are not shown on the chart; they are published in a separate document attached to the chart.

*Recommended Practice 28/3/02

2 FRANCE

SUPPLEMENT TO ANNEX 4 (TENTH EDITION)

6) b)

The bearing is given to the nearest degree. The distance is given to the nearest nautical mile.

12)

The ADIZ concept does not exist in France.

CHAPTER 8 8.3.2

Scale is not indicated on the chart but degrees and minutes are shown on meridians and parallels.

8.6.2*

Relief is not shown on this type of chart.

8.9.3

Area minimum altitudes are not indicated, and relief is not presently shown on this type of chart.

8.9.4.1.1 1)

The plain-language names of radio navigation aids are not regularly shown on this type of chart. The coordinates of the radio navigation aids are not indicated on this type of chart. This information is published in a separate document attached to the chart.

2)

The elevation of the DME antenna is not shown. The information is available in the AIP.

6)

The geographical coordinates of significant points not corresponding to the position of a radio navigation aid are not indicated on the chart; they are published in a separate document attached to the chart.

7) b)

The bearing is given to the nearest degree. The distance is given to the nearest nautical mile.

12)

The minimum altitudes established for radar vectoring are published separately on a chart entitled “Minimum radar safety altitude�.

CHAPTER 9 9.3.3

Scale is not indicated but degrees and minutes are shown on meridians and parallels.

9.5.4

France has not defined RNP routes.

9.6.2*

France does not presently show relief on this type of chart.

9.9.3.2

Area minimum altitudes are not indicated.

9.9.4.1.1 2) a)

The plain-language name is not routinely indicated on the chart.

3)

d)

The geographical coordinates of the radio navigation aids are not shown. They are available in the AIP.

e)

The elevation of the DME antenna is not shown. The information is available in the AIP. The geographical coordinates of significant points not corresponding to the position of a radio navigation aid are not indicated on the chart; they are published in a separate document attached to the chart. The bearing is given to the nearest degree. The distance is given to the nearest nautical mile.

*Recommended Practice 28/3/02

SUPPLEMENT TO ANNEX 4 (TENTH EDITION)

FRANCE 3

CHAPTER 10 10.3.3

Scale is not indicated on the chart but degrees and minutes are shown on meridians and parallels.

10.5.4

France has not defined RNP routes.

10.6.2*

France does not presently show relief on this type of chart.

10.9.3.1

Minimum sector altitudes are not indicated on this type of chart.

10.9.4.1.1 2) a)

The plain-language name is not routinely indicated on the chart.

d)

The geographical coordinates of the radio navigation aids are not shown. They are available in the AIP.

e)

The elevation of the DME antenna is not shown. The information is available in the AIP.

3)

The geographical coordinates of significant points not corresponding to the position of a radio navigation aid are not indicated on the chart; they are published in a separate document attached to the chart. The bearing is given to the nearest degree. The distance is given to the nearest nautical mile.

CHAPTER 11 11.2.2 and 11.2.3

ILS procedures and procedures for ILS without GP are shown on a single chart even if the final or missed approach segments are not identical. Visual manoeuvring with prescribed track (MVI) procedures are shown on separate charts. The components of the visual manoeuvring without prescribed track (MVL) (OCH values and minima) are issued on the Instrument Approach Chart in use preceding the MVL.

11.3.3

Scale is not indicated but degrees and minutes of latitude and longitude are shown on the borders of the chart.

11.3.3.1

A circle having a radius of 20 km (10 NM) is not drawn on the chart.

11.6.1

The chart is identified by: — a number; — the name of the aerodrome followed by its ICAO location indicator; and — the type of procedure, showing the facility or facilities used to define the IAF or those used on final approach, followed by the runway designator.

11.6.5

France has not defined RNP routes.

11.7.2

Only relief above 1 000 ft is shown, but the threshold for indicating relief is 1 000 ft rather than 4 000 ft.

11.10.1.3 and 11.10.1.4

The aerodrome elevation and the threshold elevation for the procedure are shown. The equivalent in hectopascals (rounded up to the nearest hectopascal) is given for the chart’s reference elevation.

*Recommended Practice 28/3/02

4 FRANCE 11.10.2.5

SUPPLEMENT TO ANNEX 4 (TENTH EDITION) The datum is the aerodrome elevation, except: — for precision approach procedure charts (ILS-PAR); — for non-precision approach procedure charts when the threshold of the runway on which the instrument approach is being carried out is more than 5 m (16 ft) below the aerodrome elevation.

In the above two cases, the datum is the threshold elevation. Additionally, for MVI procedures shown on a separate chart, the datum is the aerodrome elevation. Since MVI procedures are shown on an Instrument Approach Chart, the datum is that shown on the chart.

11.10.4.1

All the radio aids within the scope of the chart concerned are shown with their identifications and frequencies. Aids required directly for the procedure are indicated in bold type. On aerodromes for which no ICAO Area Chart is produced, the radio aids currently in use but located beyond the limits of the Instrument Approach Chart are indicated by their direction, mentioning the identification, frequency, magnetic bearing and distance in nautical miles from the IAF.

11.10.4.3*

The geographical coordinates of the FAP/FAF are not published.

11.10.4.4

All the radio aids within the scope of the chart concerned are shown with their identifications and frequencies. Aids required directly for the procedure are indicated in bold type. On aerodromes for which no ICAO Area Chart is produced, the radio aids currently in use but located beyond the limits of the Instrument Approach Chart are indicated by their direction, mentioning the identification, frequency, magnetic bearing and distance in nautical miles from the IAF.

11.10.6.1 and 11.10.6.3

For aerodromes on which radar vectoring is currently provided, the approach path cannot be shown in its entirety. The tracks are indicated by: — a dotted line for the prescribed arrival route; — a continuous line for the actual instrument approach procedure track; — a broken line for the missed approach procedure track and any additional procedure track to be followed only upon instructions.

Specified arrival routes are shown if no area chart is published.

11.10.6.5*

There is no ground profile shown on these charts.

11.10.8.4*

The rate of descent is not shown.

11.10.8.5

When glide path angles exceed 3.5E, the note in question is not published on the approach charts, but in the “Notes” section relating to the instrument approach and departure procedures published at the beginning of the atlas of IAC charts. The descent angle is not shown to the nearest one tenth of a degree.

11.10.8.6

The descent angle is not shown to the nearest one tenth of a degree.

11.10.9

The provisions relating to aeronautical databases are not being applied for the moment.

*Recommended Practice 28/3/02

SUPPLEMENT TO ANNEX 4 (TENTH EDITION)

FRANCE 5

CHAPTER 12 12.2

A Visual Approach Chart is published for aerodromes having a control zone or located in a complex environment.

12.6

The chart is identified by a number, the name of the aerodrome and its location indicator.

12.10.3 and 12.10.4

The airspace is shown only from the surface to the higher of the following two levels: — 1 500 m/above mean sea level (AMSL) — 600 m/above surface (ASFC).

CHAPTER 13 13.5

The annual change is not shown.

13.6.1 c)

So as not to detract from the legibility of the charts, only one geoid undulation, valid for the aerodrome as a whole, is published.

f)

The geographical coordinates of runway thresholds will soon be included in the AIP (AD2 Section).

h)

The geographical coordinates of taxiway centre line points are not published for the moment.

CHAPTER 14 14.5.2*

The annual change is not shown.

14.6

Some aerodrome data published elsewhere in the AIP cannot be reproduced on the movement chart.

CHAPTER 15 15.5.2*

The annual change is not shown.

15.6

Some aerodrome data published elsewhere in the AIP cannot be reproduced on the parking chart.

CHAPTER 16 16.2.1

A 1:1 000 000 chart is produced. Its features, which are not identical to the specifications of the World Aeronautical Chart — ICAO 1:1 000 000, are published in the AIP France — MAP section.

16.9.2

Aerodromes having IFR activities outside controlled airspace or restricted areas are indicated by a symbol which is generally placed on the centre line of the runway used for instrument approaches.

*Recommended Practice 28/3/02

6 FRANCE 16.9.5

SUPPLEMENT TO ANNEX 4 (TENTH EDITION) Controlled airspace, other than airways, is shown with the following information: — — — —

designation type; frequency (followed by an asterisk if it is not permanently monitored); the class; and the vertical limits.

CHAPTER 17 17.7.9.2

The elevation of the highest point on the chart is not indicated in the margin.

17.9.2

The chart shows aeronautical information only up to the higher of the following two levels: 1 400 m/AMSL or 600 m/ASFC. Aerodromes having IFR operations outside controlled or restricted airspace are indicated by a symbol which is generally placed on the centre line of the runway used for instrument approaches.

17.9.2.2

The following information is shown: — aerodrome elevation; — frequency to be used in aerodrome traffic (TWR, AFIS, A/A).

Runway length is deduced from a symbol used to indicate that the aerodrome is less than 1 000 m, 1 000 to 2 300 m or over 2 300 m.

17.9.5

Controlled airspace, other than airways, is shown with the following information: — — — —

designation type; frequency (followed by an asterisk if it is not permanently monitored); the class; the vertical limits.

CHAPTER 18 18.2*

The Aeronautical Navigation Chart — ICAO Small Scale is not produced.

CHAPTER 19 19.2*

Plotting Charts — ICAO are not produced.

Appendix 2

France uses slightly different symbols.

*Recommended Practice 28/3/02

SUPPLEMENT TO ANNEX 4 (TENTH EDITION)

GERMANY 1

CHAPTER 2 2.14.1

In German charts the horizontal limits of ATS airspace are characterized by different colours (red, green, blue) and not by different percentages of screen for the same colour. The proposed representation of the horizontal limits of ATS airspace provides too little contrast and is difficult to read in unfavourable lighting conditions.

Remark: We reject the obligation contained in this Standard to indicate the horizontal limits of ATS airspace in accordance with Appendix 2.

2.17.1

Integrity of aeronautical data, classification of data integrity, cyclic redundancy checks, validation and verification procedures and audits are not fully implemented.

Remark: Full implementation of the quality system according to ISO 9000 will be achieved by 1 January 2002.

CHAPTER 4 4.2.1*

Aerodrome Obstacle Charts — ICAO Type B are not published.

CHAPTER 7 7.6.2

The area minimum altitude (AMA) is not shown.

CHAPTER 8 8.2.1

The Area Chart — ICAO is not published.

8.6.2*

Representation in area charts of significant relief is made conditional on minimum flight altitudes.

Remark: Due to the relatively high flight altitudes encountered in the context of Area Charts, the unconditioned representation of relief information makes no sense.

CHAPTER 9 9.6.2*

Rules are being developed for the representation of significant relief in Standard Departure Charts which are analogous to the stipulations in paragraph 11.7.2 (Instrument Approach Charts), i.e. At greater distances from aerodromes only high elevations are represented; in the vicinity of aerodromes also small elevations will be shown.

Remark: Germany has many departure routes as long as 100 NM or more. Aircraft at the outer portions of such routes would be at considerable heights already. Chart representation of every relief exceeding 1 000 ft would mean the change of several hundred charts. Therefore, rules for the restriction of such work to manageable proportions are indispensable.

9.9.3.2

The area minimum altitude (AMA) is not shown.

*Recommended Practice 28/3/02

2 GERMANY

SUPPLEMENT TO ANNEX 4 (TENTH EDITION)

CHAPTER 10 10.6.2*

Representation in Standard Arrival Charts of significant relief is made conditional on minimum flight altitudes.

Remark: Due to the relatively high flight altitudes on Standard Arrival Routes, the unconditioned representation of relief information makes no sense.

10.9.3.2

The area minimum altitude (AMA) is not shown.

CHAPTER 11 11.10.7.1

Aerodrome operating minima are not established.

11.10.8.2

In Germany, this provision will be extended to enable its analogous use with GPS.

CHAPTER 12 12.4*

The sheet size is 210 Ă— 147 mm (A5).

12.10.5.3

Nominal approach slope angle(s) and minimum eye height(s) are not shown. The height of obstacles is not shown.

CHAPTER 13 13.5

Annual change of the magnetic variation is not shown.

13.6.1 d)

Bearing strength of RWY is not shown.

g)

Bearing strength of TWY is not shown.

CHAPTER 14 14.5.2*

Magnetic variation and its annual change are not shown.

14.6 d)

Bearing strength of TWY is not shown.

CHAPTER 15 15.5.2*

Magnetic variation and its annual change are not shown.

15.6 a)

Apron elevation is not shown.

b)

Apron bearing strength is not shown.

*Recommended Practice 28/3/02

SUPPLEMENT TO ANNEX 4 (TENTH EDITION)

GERMANY 3

CHAPTER 16 16.2.1

The World Aeronautical Chart — 1:1 000 000 is not published.

CHAPTER 17 17.7.4*

Prominent transmission lines are not shown.

17.7.7.1

Contours are not shown.

17.9.2.2

A modified version of aerodrome data in association with the aerodrome symbol is used.

CHAPTER 18 18.2*

Aeronautical Navigation Charts — Small Scale are not published.

Appendix 2 Symbol 108

The proposed symbol for ILS Back Course will not be provided.

Symbol 125

In German charts the horizontal limits of ATS airspace are characterized by different colours (red, green, blue) and not by different percentages of screen for the same colour.

Remark:.The symbol 125 representation of the horizontal limits of ATS airspace provides too little contrast and is difficult to read in unfavourable lighting conditions.

Symbol 126

This symbol will not be used. The information block is too large and could mask other important chart information.

Appendix 6 Table 1

Publication of taxiway centre line points and aircraft stand points according to the specified resolution is not yet possible.

Remark: Implementation proposed 31 December 2002.

Tables 1 and 2

In Germany, the description of obstacles reads as follows: a)

“Obstacles in the circling area for non-precision and turning departures and at the aerodrome/heliport”;

b)

“Significant obstacles in the precision approach and straight departure area”.

The accuracy for a) in Table 2 (“Elevation ...”) is 3 m instead of 1 m.

*Recommended Practice 28/3/02

4 GERMANY Tables 1 and 5

SUPPLEMENT TO ANNEX 4 (TENTH EDITION) For a few IFR aerodromes, the following positions cannot be published from the date of applicability: aerodrome reference point; runway threshold; runway and FATO length, TLOF dimensions; stopway length; and landing distance available.

Remark: More time is needed because these positions must be brought into conformity with the declared distances specified in the aerodrome licensing document (formal act of approval by national administration).

Table 2

WGS-84 geoid undulation at aerodrome/heliport elevation position is not published in Germany.

Remark: The MDH for non-precision approaches is referenced to the threshold position at all German IFR aerodromes.

Table 4

In Germany, line 2 of this table reads “En-route fix formations” and line 4 reads “Terminal and instrument approach procedure fix formations” to correspond to Table 5. The resolution for both is 1 degree instead of 1/10 degree.

Table 5

The chart resolution for en-route fix formations distance; runway and FATO length, TLOF dimensions; stopway length; and landing distance available is 1 m instead of 0.5 m.

Remark: Implementation proposed 31 December 2002.

28/3/02

SUPPLEMENT TO ANNEX 4 (TENTH EDITION)

INDIA 1

CHAPTER 5 5.2

Implementation will take about one year more because the clearance from Ministry of Defence/Survey of India is required.

CHAPTER 9 9.6.2*

Implementation will take about one year more because the clearance from Ministry of Defence/Survey of India is required.

CHAPTER 10 10.6.2*

Implementation will take about one year more because the clearance from Ministry of Defence/Survey of India is required.

CHAPTER 11 11.7.2

Implementation will take about one year more because the clearance from Ministry of Defence/Survey of India is required.

CHAPTER 20

Implementation will take about one year more because the clearance from Ministry of Defence/Survey of India is required.

*Recommended Practice

28/3/02

SUPPLEMENT TO ANNEX 4 (TENTH EDITION)

LITHUANIA 1

CHAPTER 4 4.2

Not produced. No requirements. Non-mandatory chart.

CHAPTER 5 5.2

Not produced. Obstacles published in AIP Conditional Chart.

CHAPTER 16 16.2

Not produced. In use charts published by Ministry of Defence (MOD) (UK) and National Imagery and Mapping Agency (NIMA) (USA).

CHAPTER 18 18.2*

Not produced. No requirements. Non-mandatory chart.

CHAPTER 19 19.2*

Not produced. No requirements. Non-mandatory chart.

*Recommended Practice 28/3/02

SUPPLEMENT TO ANNEX 4 (TENTH EDITION)

MAURITIUS 1

CHAPTER 17 17.2*

Aeronautical Chart — ICAO 1:500 000 is not published.

Remark: For the time being, the Republic of Mauritius has no operational requirement for production of the Aeronautical Chart — ICAO 1:500 000.

*Recommended Practice 28/3/02

SUPPLEMENT TO ANNEX 4 (TENTH EDITION)

NEW ZEALAND 1

CHAPTER 2 2.18.2

Geoid undulation is not published.

CHAPTER 4 4.2.1*

Not implemented.

CHAPTER 5 5.2

Not implemented. Survey and obstacle data available from Aviation Publishing.

CHAPTER 7 7.6.2

Area minimum altitudes are not shown.

7.9.3.1.1 2)

DME elevations are not shown on charts.

7.9.4.2

Not implemented. A chart showing QNH Areas is given in the OPS section of the IFG.

CHAPTER 8 8.6.2*

Not implemented.

8.9.3

Not implemented.

8.9.4.1.1 2)

Parallels and meridians are not shown. The chart is orientated to True North and both True and Magnetic North are shown.

CHAPTER 9 9.4.3

Graduation marks are not shown. Geographical coordinates are given for all navigation aids and reporting points.

9.6.2*

Not implemented.

9.9.4.1.1 2) e)

DME elevations are not depicted on charts.

5)

Transition altitude is not shown on the SID chart. All departure procedures published show altitudes, and all altitudes shown are below the transition altitude (11 000 ft).

6)

Not implemented.

7)

Speed restriction requirements are given in the OPS section of the Instrument Flight Guide (IFG).

*Recommended Practice 28/3/02

2 NEW ZEALAND 9) c)

SUPPLEMENT TO ANNEX 4 (TENTH EDITION) Transponder codes are not specific to the SID procedures. Procedures for transponder codes are given in the RAC section of the Planning Manual.

CHAPTER 10 10.4.2*

Parallels and meridians are not shown. The chart is oriented to True North and both True and Magnetic North are shown.

10.6.2*

Not implemented.

10.9.4.1.1 2) e)

DME elevations are not depicted on charts.

5)

Transition level is not shown on the STAR chart. All arrival procedures published show altitudes, and all altitudes shown are below the transition level.

6)

Speed restriction requirements are given in the OPS section of the IFG.

8) c)

Transponder codes are not specific to the STAR procedure. Procedures for transponder codes are given in the RAC section of the Planning Manual.

CHAPTER 11 11.3.3

The scale of the chart is not shown.

11.5.2*

Graduations are shown on the left and top neat lines only.

11.6.2

The categories of aircraft the procedure is authorized for are shown in the top centre of the chart.

11.7.2

Not implemented.

11.10.2.4*

All obstacle heights are referenced to mean sea level.

11.10.4.3*

Geographical coordinates are not shown for the final approach fix.

11.10.6.5*

Not implemented.

11.10.8.1

A table of ground speeds and times from the final approach fix to the missed approach point is not given.

11.10.8.5

Descent angle shown as a percentage.

11.10.9

Not implemented.

CHAPTER 12 12.10.2.3*

The heights of obstacles are not shown.

12.10.5.3

Not implemented.

*Recommended Practice 28/3/02

SUPPLEMENT TO ANNEX 4 (TENTH EDITION)

NEW ZEALAND 3

CHAPTER 13 13.5

Annual rate of change of magnetic variation is not shown.

13.6.1 c)

Geoid undulation is not published.

f) 13.6.2 d)

Not implemented.

Heliport safety areas are not shown on Heliport Charts.

CHAPTER 14 14.3.2*

A scale bar is not shown.

14.5.2*

The annual rate of change of magnetic variation is not shown.

14.6 a)

Apron elevations are not shown.

f)

Coordinates of taxiway centre line points not shown.

*Recommended Practice 28/3/02

SUPPLEMENT TO ANNEX 4 (TENTH EDITION)

NORWAY 1

CHAPTER 5 5.2

This chart is not produced in Norway.

CHAPTER 7 7.6.2

Area minimum altitudes are not shown.

7.9.3.1.1 9)

Change-over points are not shown.

CHAPTER 8 8.6.1

Shorelines, rivers and lakes are not shown.

8.6.2*

Area minimum altitudes are not shown.

8.9.4.1.1 10)

Change-over points are not shown.

12)

Minimum altitudes for radar vectoring are not shown.

CHAPTER 9 9.9.3.2

Area minimum altitudes are not shown.

CHAPTER 10 10.9.3.2

Area minimum altitudes are not shown.

CHAPTER 11 11.10.4.3*

Data and accuracy are not provided.

CHAPTER 13 13.2.1

Aerodrome charts are produced for Båtsfjord, Bergen/Flesland, Bodø, Brønnøy, Geilo/Dagali, Fagernes/Leirin, Førde/Bringeland, Hasvik, Kristiandsand/Kjevik, Mosjøen/Kjaerstad, Notodden, Oslo/Gardermocn, Rørvik/Ryum, Røst, Sandefjord/Torp, Stord/Sørstokken, Tromsø, Trondheim/Voernes, Vardø/Svartnes.

13.6.1 g)

Geographical coordinates of taxiway centre line points are not provided.

*Recommended Practice 28/3/02

2 NORWAY

SUPPLEMENT TO ANNEX 4 (TENTH EDITION)

CHAPTER 14 14.6 f)

Geographical coordinates of taxiway centre line points are not provided.

CHAPTER 15 15.6 e)

Geographical coordinates of taxiway centre line points are not provided.

CHAPTER 16 16.2.1

28/3/02

This chart is only produced for the polar regions of Bear Island, Jan Mayen and Spitsbergen and is without current aeronautical information.

SUPPLEMENT TO ANNEX 4 (TENTH EDITION)

PANAMA 1

CHAPTER 11 11.7.2

Not implemented. Lack of technology.

11.10.9 d)

The required descent angle is published when it is not the optimum one.

CHAPTER 16

In the absence of this chart, the 1:500 000 is published instead.

28/3/02

SUPPLEMENT TO ANNEX 4 (TENTH EDITION)

SLOVAKIA 1

CHAPTER 19 19.2*

The Plotting Chart — ICAO is not published in the Slovak Republic.

* Recommended Practice 28/3/02

SUPPLEMENT TO ANNEX 4 (TENTH EDITION)

SWEDEN 1

CHAPTER 2 2.14.1

Will not be fulfilled.

CHAPTER 7 7.9.3.1.1

Minimum flight altitudes are not shown. Radio communication facilities listed with their frequencies are not shown.

CHAPTER 8 8.9.3

Minimum flight altitudes are not shown.

8.9.4.1.1

Area minimum altitudes are not shown. Radio communication facilities listed with their frequencies are not shown.

CHAPTER 9 9.6.1

Shorelines are not shown.

9.9.4.1.1

Minimum flight altitudes along the route are not shown. Transition altitude/height is not shown.

CHAPTER 10 10.6.1

Shorelines are not shown.

10.9.3

Minimum sector altitudes are not shown.

10.9.4.1.1

Minimum flight altitudes along the route are not shown. Transition altitude/height is not shown.

CHAPTER 11 11.3.3.1

A distance circle with a radius of 10 NM is not shown.

28/3/02

SUPPLEMENT TO ANNEX 4 (TENTH EDITION)

UGANDA 1

CHAPTER 4 4.2.1*

Aerodrome Obstacle Chart — Type B is not published.

CHAPTER 6 6.2

Precision Approach Terrain Chart is not published.

CHAPTER 11 11.7.2

Relief contours are not published.

CHAPTER 17 17.2*

Aeronautical Chart — ICAO 1:500 000 is not published.

*Recommended Practice 28/3/02

SUPPLEMENT TO ANNEX 4 (TENTH EDITION)

URUGUAY 1

CHAPTER 3 3.2.1

Not applied at present due to lack of staff. Expected to be incorporated at the end of 2002.

CHAPTER 4

Not applied at present due to lack of staff. Expected to be incorporated at the end of 2002.

CHAPTER 7 7.9.3.1.1 12)

Not applied. It is planned to incorporate it by the end of 2002, pending definition, if necessary, of the air defence identification zone (ADIZ).

CHAPTER 20

It is planned to comply with this by the end of 2003, pending procurement of new equipment.

28/3/02