The Result of Partial Replacement of Cement by using Waste Fly Ash and Natural Sand by using Waste

IJSTE - International Journal of Science Technology & Engineering | Volume 2 | Issue 06 | December 2015 ISSN (online): 2349-784X

The Result of Partial Replacement of Cement by using Waste Fly Ash and Natural Sand by using Waste Marble Dust, Stone Dust on Mechanical Properties of Concrete Mr. Lokesh Kumar M. E. Student Department of Civil Engineering M.I.T.S., Gwalior (M.P.), India

Prof. Gautam Bhadoriya Professor Department of Civil Engineering M.I.T.S., Gwalior (M.P.), India

Abstract The present paper deals with the effect on strength and mechanical properties of cement concrete by using Fly ash (FA), Marble dust (MD) & Stone dust (SD). Concrete has become an indispensable construction material and it is now used in greater quantities than any other material. In the present context durability, strength, economy and stainable development are key issues for development. 25% and 35% of fly ash is used as replacement of cement and 30% and 40% natural sand is replaced by MD and SD in different proportion in concrete. Properties of fresh concrete and hardened concrete are investigated. Concrete prepared by replacing 25% of cement by Fly ash and 30% of sand by marble dust and stone dust showed good results. The 7day & 28 days compressive strength was only about 3 to 4 % lesser than the control concrete. Keywords: Ordinary Portland Cement (43 grade), Fly ash, marble dust, stone dust, Compressive strength, M30 ________________________________________________________________________________________________________

I. INTRODUCTION In India large amount of fly ash is generated in thermal power plant with an imperative blow on environmental and living organism. The use of fly ash marble powder & stone dust in concrete can reduce the consumption of natural resources and also diminishes the effect of pollutant in environment. Fly ash is one of the residues generated in the combustion of coal and Marble is a metamorphic rock resulting from the transformation of pure lime stone. The purity of the marble is responsible for its colour and appearance. it is white and used for construction and decoration ; as it is durable and good in appearance. The globle consumption of natural sand is very high, due to the extensive use of concrete. In general, the demand of natural sand is quite high in developing countries to satisfy country like India facing shortage in good quality natural sand. In past decade variable cost of natural sand used as fine aggregate in concrete increased the cost of construction. In the situation research began for inexpensive and easily available alternative material to natural sand. Abbreviation: FA, fly ash; MD, marble dust; SD, stone dust .

II. LITERATURE REVIEW Priyanka A., Jadhav, Dilip K. KUlkarni reported that The effect of water cement ratio on hardened properties of cement mortar with partial replacement of natural sand by manufactured sand is investigated. Designed mortar mix having proportion as 1:2, 1:3 and 1:6 with water cement ratio of 0.5 and 0.55 respectively is used in experimental study. Mortar cube exhibits excellent strength with 50% replacement of natural sand by manufactured sand. HanifiBinici, Hasan Kaplan and SalihYilmaz, reported that some mechanical properties concrete containing marble dusts (MD) and limestone dustes were investigated. Seven concrete mixtures were produced in three series with control mixes having 400kg cement content. These control mixes were modified to 5,10 and 15% MD and LD in place of fine sand aggregate. The compressive strength of concrete were measured for 7, 28,90 and 360 days. A.Krishnamoorthi, and G. Mohan Kumar reported that concurrent use of fly ash and quarry dust in concrete will make the concrete by using their properties in a beneficial way. The decrease in early strength by the addition of fly ash is compensated by addition of quarry dust .The decrease in workability by the addition of quarry dust is reduced by the addition fly ash. This paper investigates the workability and strength characteristics of Quarry Dust Concrete (QDC) containing 0% to 30% of fly ash. Based on the test results, it can be concluded that combined use of quarry dust and fly ash can be shown improved strength in concrete and also preserve the environment.

31

The Result of Partial Replacement of Cement by using Waste Fly Ash and Natural Sand by using Waste Marble Dust, Stone Dust on Mechanical Properties of Concrete (IJSTE/ Volume 2 / Issue 06 / 008)

III. MATERIAL AND METHOD A. Cement The cement was used ordinary portland cement (43 grade) The physical test were conducted on OPC (43 grade). Test Fineness of cement Consistency of cement Specific gravity Initial setting time Final setting time

Result 5% 32% 3.10 45min 445min

IS: Standerd shall not be more than 10% Shall not be less than 30 %

Remark With 90µ Seive With vicat appratus With Le chatelier Flask With vicat appratus With vicat appratus

Shall not be less than 30 min shall not be more than 600 min

B. Fly Ash Fly ash used was obtained from Parichha thermal power plant Jhansi (U.P.) India. Fly ash is one of the residues generated in the combuston of coal. Specific gravity of fly ash is 2.14.  Fineness - 18% retained on 90µ sieve C. Stone Dust Stone dust used was obtained from stone crusher plant located The fineness modulus and specific gravity are 2.98 and 2.64 respectively.

in

Deen

dayal

nagar,

Gwalior

(M.P.).

D. Marble Dust Marble dust used was obtained from processing plant located at Radha swami Dayal bagh Agra(U.P.). And It is obtained by sawing and polishing of marble blocks. Specific gravity is 2.72 Fineness - 24% retained on 90µ sieve E. Natural Sand    

Specific gravity = 2.62 Water absorbed= 1.5% Sieve analysis = Ι zone Fineness modulus = 3.11

F. Aggregate  

Specific gravity = 2.70 Water absorbed = 0.33%

IV. EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION The experimental investigation was planned to know the effect of fly ash and marble dust, stone dust Addition as a replacement of Ordinary portland cement (43 grade) and fine aggregate (natural sand) . 12 types of concrete sample were prepared using 150x150x150 mm mould for control concrete M30 mix was designed as per IS 10262:2009 . A. Control Mix Water(liters) 0.45 183

Cement(kg) 1 406

Fine Aggregate(kg) 1.44 585

Coarse Aggregate(kg) 2.90 1181

B. Details of Sample Mix

Cement

Fly ash

C M1 M2 M3 M4

100% 75% 75% 75% 75%

0% 25% 25% 25% 25%

Fine Aggregate Sand MD SD 100% 70% 70% 70% 60%

0% 20% 15% 10% 30%

0% 10% 15% 20% 10%

Coarse Aggregate

W/C

100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

0.45 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55

32

The Result of Partial Replacement of Cement by using Waste Fly Ash and Natural Sand by using Waste Marble Dust, Stone Dust on Mechanical Properties of Concrete (IJSTE/ Volume 2 / Issue 06 / 008)

M5 M6 M7 M8 M9 M10 M11 M12

75% 75% 65% 65% 65% 65% 65% 65%

25% 25% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35%

60% 60% 70% 70% 70% 60% 60% 60%

20% 10% 20% 15% 10% 30% 20% 10%

20% 30% 10% 15% 20% 10% 20% 30%

100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

0.55 0.55 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60

C. Detail of Samplesâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; Strength by Adding 25% And 35% Fly Ash S.No.

Mix

7 days Avg. strength (N/mm2)

28 days Avg. strength (N/mm2)

1

C

27.55

39.20

2

M1

20.88

29.80

3

M2

23.55

32.00

4

M3

26.66

37.35

5

M4

21.33

30.25

6

M5

22.22

31.55

7

M6

20.88

29.80

8

M7

19.55

28.00

9

M8

20.44

28.90

10

M9

23.11

33.35

11

M10

19.55

27.55

12

M11

17.77

25.80

13

M12

18.66

26.70

Fig. 1: 28 days Compressive Strength Value (N/mm2) at 25% addition of fly ash

33

The Result of Partial Replacement of Cement by using Waste Fly Ash and Natural Sand by using Waste Marble Dust, Stone Dust on Mechanical Properties of Concrete (IJSTE/ Volume 2 / Issue 06 / 008)

D. Compressive Strength at 25% fly ash

Fig. 2: 28 days Compressive Strength

Fig. 3: 28 days Compressive Strength Value (N/mm2) at 35% addition of fly ash

E. Compressive Strength at 35% fly ash

Fig. 4: 28 days Compressive Strength

34

The Result of Partial Replacement of Cement by using Waste Fly Ash and Natural Sand by using Waste Marble Dust, Stone Dust on Mechanical Properties of Concrete (IJSTE/ Volume 2 / Issue 06 / 008)

V. CONCLUSION 1) Water cement ratio increased with addition of fly ash than control mix in diverse mix shown above table. 2) Initial and Final setting time of concrete are decrease with addition of fly ash. 3) The maximum 28 days compressive strength was achieved in mix M3 than other diverse concrete mixes M1, M2-M12 shown above table. It is very much near to the control mix. 4) Using fly ash, marble dust and stone dust waste in concrete mix proved to be very useful to solve environmental problems and reduces to some extent the requirement of cement in large quantity. Therefore, it is recommended to re-use these wastes in concrete to move towards sustainable development in construction industry.

REFERENCES [1] APriyanka, Jadhav, Dilip k. ,Kulkarni “ Effect of replacement of natural sand by manufactured sand on properties of cement mortar ”International Journal of Civil and Structural Engineering, Volume 3, No 3, ISSN 0976-4399,2011. [2] HanifiBinici, Hasan Kaplan and SalihYilmaz, (2007), “Influence of marble and limestone dusts as additives on some mechanical properties of concrete,” Science Research and Essay, 2(9), pp 372379. [3] Bhattacharya B, et al,” Mass scale utilization of fly ash, ” Proceeding of one- day work shop, organized by the department of civil Engineer JMI, New Delhi 2013 . [4] Nadgir,N.S. and Bhavikantti, s.s.,(2007). “Stone quarry dust – an alternative for sand in concrete,” second National conference on material and structures (MAST), NIT warangal. [5] Sahu,sunil kumar and sachan A.K.,(2003). “crushed stone waste as fine aggregate for concrete, “ the indian concrete Journal, 845-848. [6] Shetty, M.S.(2008). Book “concrete Technology, “S. chand and company Ltd. , New Delhi. [7] Maher, M. it , and Balaguru, P.N. 1993. “ Propertion of flowable high – volume fly ash cement composit. “ J. Mater. Civ. Eng. , 52,212-225 . [8] Joshi R.C., Duncan ,D.M., and mc master, H.M. (1975). “ New and conventional engineering uses of fly ash. “ J. Transp. Eng. , 1014,791-806 . [9] Cong kou, chi sun poon and Dixon chan, “ influence of fly ash as cement Replacement on the properties of Recycled Aggregate concrete. “ J. of Mater. In civil Engg. ASCE, 709 (2007) . [10] Malhotra V.M., Ramezanian pour A.A., Fly ash in Concrete, “second edition, sept.(1994) . [11] IS 516 – 1959 “ method of mix Design, “ Bureau of Indian standerd, New delhi. [12] IS 10262- 1981 “IS method of Mix design, “Bureau of Indian standard, New delhi. [13] Gurr Metin , Tekin Liker. Investigated utilization of waste marble powder as an additive in cement production. Materials and design 2010; 31:4039 – 4042P. [14] Tayeb Bouziani, Lamer or mohamad. Effect of marble powder on the properties of self-compacting sand concrete. The open construction and building Technology Journal 2011; 5:25 – 1870P. [15] S.Suresh, Animesh Mishra and Abhishek Pandey (2013) “ Green Cement For Sustainable Concrete Using Marble Dust” International Journal of Chem Tech Research CODEN (USA) : IJCRGG ISSN : 0974- 4290 Vol.5, No.2,pp 616-622 AprilJune 2013.

35

Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

The Result of Partial Replacement of Cement by using Waste Fly Ash and Natural Sand by using Waste

Published on Dec 10, 2015

IJSTE

The present paper deals with the effect on strength and mechanical properties of cement concrete by using Fly ash (FA), Marble dust (MD) & Stone dust (SD). Concrete has become an indispensable construction material and it is now used in greater quantities than any other material. In the present context durability, strength, economy and stainable development are key issues for development. 25% and 35% of fly ash is used as replacement of cement and 30% and 40% natural sand is replaced by MD and SD in different proportion in concrete. Properties of fresh concrete and hardened concrete are investigated. Concrete prepared by replacing 25% of cement by Fly ash and 30% of sand by marble dust and stone dust showed good results. The 7day & 28 days compressive strength was only about 3 to 4 % lesser than the control concrete.