Modelling and Analysis of EEG Signals Based on Real Time Control for Wheel Chair

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR TRENDS IN ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY VOLUME 5 ISSUE 1 – MAY 2015 - ISSN: 2349 - 9303

Modelling and Analysis of EEG Signals Based on Real Time Control for Wheel Chair Madhu Sudha.M1

Kalaiarasi.A2

PG Scholar, RVS College of Engineering and Technology, Dept of EST E-mail Id: madhu.mms18@gmail.com

Assistant Professor, RVS College of Engineering and Technology,Dept of EEE E-mail Id: respond2kalai@yahoo.in

Abstract—Free versatility is center to having the capacity to perform exercises of day by day living without anyone else's input. In this proposed framework introduce an imparted control construction modeling that couples the knowledge and cravings of the client with the exactness of a controlled wheelchair. Outspread Basis Function system was utilized to characterize the predefined developments, for example, rest, forward, regressive, left and right of the wheelchair. This EEG-based cerebrum controlled wheelchair has been produced for utilization by totally incapacitated patients. The proposed outline incorporates a novel methodology for selecting ideal terminal positions, a progression of sign transforming and an interface to a controlled wheelchair.The Brain Controlled Wheelchair (BCW) is a basic automated framework intended for individuals, for example, bolted in individuals, who are not ready to utilize physical interfaces like joysticks or catches. The objective is to add to a framework usable in healing centers and homes with insignificant base alterations, which can help these individuals recover some portability.

Also, it is explored whether execution in the STOP interface would be influenced amid movement, and discovered no modification with respect to the static performance.Finally, the general procedure was assessed and contrasted with other cerebrum controlled wheelchair ventures. Notwithstanding the overhead needed to choose the destination on the interface, the wheelchair is quicker than others .It permits to explore in a commonplace indoor environment inside a sensible time. Accentuation was put on client's security and comfort,the movement direction procedure guarantees smooth, protected and unsurprising route, while mental exertion and exhaustion are minimized by lessening control to destination determination.

Index Terms—ElectroEncephaloGram, BrainComputerInterface,

—————————— (Electroencephalogram) is a delegate sign containing data about the state of the mind. The state of the wave may contain helpful data about the condition of the mind. As of late, cerebrum PC interface and astute sign division have pulled in an extraordinary enthusiasm going from drug to military objectives[2].

I INTRODUCTION The EEG is recorded between cathodes put in standard positions on the scalp and has an ordinary abundancy of 2-100 microvolts and a recurrence range from 0.1 to 60 Hz. Most action happens inside the accompanying recurrence groups; delta (0.5 - 4 Hz), theta (4-8 Hz), alpha (8-13 Hz), beta (13-22 Hz) and gamma (30-40 Hz). The potential at the scalp gets from electrical movement of extensive synchronized gatherings of neurons inside the cerebrum. The action of single neurons or little gatherings is weakened excessively by the skull andscalp[1]. EEG action specifically recurrence groups is regularly connected with specific cognitive states. Flags in the alpha band, for instance, are connected with unwinding. In this manner, a cathode put over the visual cortex that distinguishes alpha band signs is recognizing visual unwinding. An anode over the engine cortex grabbing alpha band Signs is recognizing engine unwinding. The EEG

To encourage mind PC interface gathering, an expert system for gimmick extraction from EEG sign is wanted. The cerebrum electrical action is spoken to by the electroencephalogram (EEG) signals. EEG is the recording of electrical activity along the scalp. EEG measures voltage changes happening in view of ionic current streams inside the neurons of the brain[3].In clinical settings, EEG insinuates the recording of the mind's spontaneous electrical activity more than a short time of time, ordinarily 20–40 minutes, as recorded from different cathodes set on the scalp. Demonstrative applications by extensive focus on the loathsome substance of EEG, that is, the kind of neural movements

23

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR TRENDS IN ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY VOLUME 5 ISSUE 1 – MAY 2015 - ISSN: 2349 - 9303 that may be seen in EEG signals.Brain cells relate with each other by making humble electrical pointers, called driving forces[4 ]

2 TYPES OF BRAIN WAVES

An EEG measures this activity. The test is done by an EEG technologist in your authority's office or at a mending focus or research[5]. EEG, ECG, EOG and EMG are measured with a Differential enhancer which enlists the complexity between two anodes affixed to the skin. In any case, the galvanic skin response measures electrical security and the MEG measures the Magnetic field instigated by electrical streams (Electroencephalogram) of the mind[6]. Electrical forces and changes in electrical resistances across over tissues can moreover be measured from plants[7]. Bio-signs may moreover imply any non-electrical marker that is prepared for being checked from biotic animals, for instance, mechanical pointers (e.g. the mechanomyogram or MMG), acoustic markers (e.g. phonetic and non-phonetic verbalizations, breathing), manufactured signs (e.g. ph, oxygenation) and optical signs (e.g. improvements).

The vicinity of EEG musical development in scalp recordings is simply possible as an eventual outcome of the synchronized activation of massifs of neurons, the summed synaptic events of which become sufficiently huge[8]. The cadenced activity may be made by both pacemaker neurons having internal limit of musical movements and neurons which can't make a musicality freely however can synchronize their development through excitatory and inhibitory relationship in such a path, to the point that constitute a framework with pacemaker properties[9]. The late may be appointed as neuronal oscillators (Madler et al 1991; Kasanovich and Borisyuk 1994; Abarbanel et al 1996). The oscillators have their own specific discharge repeat, distinctive among assorted oscillators and dependent on their inward reconciliation, regardless of close trademark electrophysiological properties of single neurons which constitute unique oscillators[10]. The neuronal oscillators start to act in synchrony after use of outside substantial impelling (Lopes da Silva 1991; Basar 1992) or covered pointers from internal sources, for case, as a result of cognitive stacking (Basar et al 1989). The separated equipment of the neuronal oscillators basic EEG rhythms was given in the Report of International Federation on Clinical Neurophysiology (IFCN) Committee on Basic Mechanisms (Steriade et al 1990).

Brainwave Type

Frequency range

Mental states conditions

and

Delta

0.1Hz 3Hz

to

Deep, dreamless sleep, non-REM sleep, unconscious

eta

4Hz 7Hz

to

Intuitive, creative, recall, fantasy, imaginary, dream

Alpha

8Hz 12Hz

to

Relaxed, but not drowsy, tranquil, conscious

Low Beta

12Hz 15Hz

to

Formerly SMR, relaxed yet focused, integrated

Midrange Beta

16Hz 20Hz

to

inking, aware of self & surroundings

High Beta

21Hz 30Hz

to

Alertness, agitation

Gamma

30Hz 100Hz

to

Motor Functions, higher mental activity

Table:Types of Brain waves

3 ELECTRODE CAP Each application needs an upgraded approach to gather information. To oblige this needs different sorts of terminal tops like dynamic or inactive tops, protected or non-attractive tops for a few applications like fMRI, TMS, MEG and so on are available.Electrode Cap with dynamic cathodes minimizing readiness time and lessening ecological commotion and additionally development relics to a base. Coordinated three shading impedance pointers straightforwardly on the cathode and programming controlled strong gimmicks disentangle the setup. Good with all Brain Products enhancers and additionally with different other accessible EEG amplifiers.There are a few separate sorts and sizes of EEG tops. We have 70 and 128 direct caps,which come in the accompanying sizes: 70 channel Child, pink and blue and 70 channel Adult large,Adult x-vast; 128 Adult size top. See beneath for montage of standard 70 channel cap[11].

24

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR TRENDS IN ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY VOLUME 5 ISSUE 1 – MAY 2015 - ISSN: 2349 - 9303 3.3 PIR Sensor

FIG:PIR sensor FIG:Electrode Cap

The PIR (Passive Infra-Red) Sensor is a pyroelectric gadget that distinguishes movement by measuring changes in the infrared levels transmitted by encompassing items. This movement can be distinguished by checking for a high flag on a solitary I/O pin[13]. Pyroelectric gadgets, for example, the PIR sensor, have components made of a crystalline material that creates an electric charge when presented to infrared radiation. The progressions in the measure of infrared striking the component change the voltages created, which are measured by an on-board enhancer.

The gadget contains an uncommon channel called a Fresnel lens, which centers the infrared signs onto the element[14]. As the encompassing infrared signs change quickly, the on-board enhancer trips the yield to demonstrate motion[15].

3.1 Positioning the cap The top is named numerically (eg, 1-70) as opposed to in the 10-20 framework (eg, CZ, P4, etc).However, there is a guide which makes an interpretation of the numbers into the 10-20 framework, see underneath for the montage.When situating the top on the subject's head, you need CZ to be at the intersection of midway between the ears and midway between the nasion and inion. There is an adaptable measuring tape in the bureau stamped "day by day readiness supplies" that can be utilized for this reason. In a perfect world, once CZ is moved to one side area, the top ought to rest low on the temple as opposed to high up at the hairline[12]. On the off chance that the top is too little, utilize a bigger size or spot extra anodes on the temple keeping in mind the end goal to gather better frontal.

4 LABVIEW

3.2 IR Sensor

Lab view short for (Laboratory Virtual Instrument EngineeringWorkbench) is a framework outline stage and improvement environment for a visual programming dialect from National Instruments[16].

The graphical dialect is named "G" (not to be mistaken for G-code). Initially discharged for the Apple Macintosh in 1986, LabVIEW is ordinarily utilized for information procurement, instrument control, and modern computerization on a mixed bag of stages including Microsoft Windows, different adaptations of UNIX, Linux, and Mac OS X. The most recent adaptation of LabVIEW will be LabVIEW 2014, discharged in August 2014[17].

The IR Sensor-Single is a universally useful vicinity sensor. Here we utilize it for crash identification. The module comprise of an IR emitter and IR beneficiary pair. The high exactness IR recipient dependably identifies an IR signal. The module comprises of 358 comparator IC. The yield of sensor is high at whatever point it IR recurrence and low overall. The on-board LED pointer helps client to check status of the sensor without utilizing any extra hardware.The power utilization of this module is low. It gives an advanced yield. The affectability of the IR Sensor is tuned utilizing the potentiometer. The potentiometer is tuneable in both the bearings. At first tune the potentiometer in clockwise heading such that the Indicator LED begins sparkling. When that is accomplished, turn the potentiometer simply enough in against clockwise course to turn off the Indicator LED. As of right now the affectability of the beneficiary is most extreme.

4.1 VIRTUAL INSTRUMENTS Basically, a Virtual Instrument (VI) is a LabVIEW programming component. A VI comprises of a front board, square graph, and a symbol that speaks to the system. The front board is utilized to show controls and pointers for the client, while the piece graph contains the code for the VI[18]. The symbol, which is a visual representation of the VI, has connectors for project inputs and yields. Programming dialects, for example, C and BASIC utilization capacities and subroutines as programming components. LabVIEW utilizes the VI. The front board of a VI handles the capacity inputs and yields, and the code chart performs the work of the VI. Numerous VIs can be utilized to make huge scale

FIG:IR Sensor

25

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR TRENDS IN ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY VOLUME 5 ISSUE 1 – MAY 2015 - ISSN: 2349 - 9303 applications, truth be told, extensive scale applications may have a few hundred VIs. A VI may be utilized as the client interface or as a subroutine in an application.

Client interface components, for example, charts are dragand-drop simple in LabVIEW.

summoning boost), Evoked Potentials (EPs) oblige a particular outside jolt and start in tangible cortex regions. An average evoked potential is the Visual Evoked Potential (VEP). In light of a strobe light, for instance, the EEG over the visual cortex will change at the same recurrence as the animating light. Subjects can be prepared to control the quality of their relentless state VEP with the utilization of biofeedback. This structures the premise of other BCI frameworks. Since the EEG control sign is at an exact, known and controllable recurrence it is anything but difficult to identify. This implies that the ensuing sign transforming and example distinguishment errands are extremely basic . Occasion Related Potentials (ERPs) happen in light of, or ahead of time of specific `events'. The P300 ERP, for instance, happens 300 ms after an occasion strikes which the subject has been advised to react. The occasion must be one in a progression of Bernouilli occasions (ie. one of two sorts) and have a low likelihood of occuring.

4.2 PERFORMANCE LabVIEW makes it hard to get machine or equipment restricted execution and has a tendency to create applications that are essentially slower than hand coded local dialects, for example, C. This is particularly clear in unpredictable applications including a few bits of equipment.

5 BCI The EEG is recorded between anodes put in standard positions on the scalp and has an ordinary adequacy of 2-100 microvolts and a recurrence range from 0.1 to 60 Hz. Most movement happens inside the accompanying recurrence groups; delta (0.5 - 4 Hz), theta (4-8 Hz), alpha (8-13 Hz), beta (13-22 Hz) and gamma(30-40Hz).

The potential at the scalp gets from electrical movement of extensive synchronized gatherings of neurons inside the mind.

SynchronizationsorDesynchronizations(ERS/ERD)areA Cchangeswhichoccurinresponsetoevents(whereasERPsa reDCchanges).Themurhythm,forexample,isdesychnroni zedbymovement,tactilestimulationorbyplannedmoveme nt(thepicturesbelowshow pictures of the head from above - the left picture is for a subject arranging a right hand development and the right picture is for arranged left hand development - dim zones relate to solid musicality. Anode arrangement and the resulting sign handling can be guided by what is known of the neurophysiology of the components that produce the EEG signals. In this manner, for instance, frameworks usingthemu cadence ERD will have numerous cathodes over the suitable left and right engine cortex range.

Frequently, controlling EEG signs are utilized which are relied upon to show up on a specific side of the cortex.

Thusly, peculiarities, for example, ghastly asymettry proportions which overstate these hemispherical contrasts are extricated at the sign handling stage (mental math errands, for instance, are known to cause diverse levels of action in every half of the globe.

EEG movement specifically recurrence groups is regularly connected with specific cognitive statesSignals in the alpha band, for instance, are connected with unwinding. Accordingly, a terminal set over the visual cortex that recognizes alpha band signs is distinguishing visual unwinding. A terminal over the engine cortex grabbing alpha band signs is distinguishing engine unwinding (the mu musicality). Mind Computer interfaces use EEG signals which can be controlled by the client. Thesetypes ofEEG signs fall into two fundamental classes; evoked reactions which are EEG parts evoked by a particular tactile jolt, for example, a glimmering light, and spontaneous EEG signals which comprise of EEG segments that happen without boost, for example, the alpha musicality or the mu beat. Note, nonetheless, that a few spontaneous EEG flags, for example, the mu rhythm[19].

In this way, we have been discussing the EEG which is recorded from cathodes put on the scalp. There is likewise a related recording technique called the electrocorticogram (ECoG) in which terminals are set on the surface of the cortex. Also there are different systems in which embedded terminals are set inside the cortex.

The capacity of subjects to create voluntarily solid spontaneous EEG rhythms, for example, the alpha mood or the mu musicality can be upgraded by the utilization of biofeedback or operant molding. This is a methodology whereby the client is given a sign concerning how well he/she is controlling a gadget (eg. by taking a gander at it). This constitutes the `feedback'.

The subject then changes their EEG motion in light of this input. Along these lines, the subject to learns control the gadget through a learning procedure which can take a few hours, days or weeks to finish. BCI frameworks grew in the 1960s and 1970s depended on biofeedback. Evoked Responses utilized as a part of BCI exploration fall into three principle classes[20].

Evoked Potentials (DC changes in light of ceaseless

6 ADVANTAGES: EEG is quiet, which considers better examination of the responses, as in a segment of exchange techniques, especially MRI and MRS. These can bring about a mixture of undesirable issues with the data, moreover block usage of these systems with individuals that have metal installs in their body, for instance, metal-holding pacemakers.

26

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR TRENDS IN ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY VOLUME 5 ISSUE 1 – MAY 2015 - ISSN: 2349 - 9303 •EEG does exclude presentation to radioligands, unlike positron release tomography. ERP studies could be coordinated with for the most part essential norms, differentiated and IE square framework fmri studies

[7]

•To an extraordinary degree uninvasive, unlike Electrocorticography, which truly obliges cathodes to be put on the surface of the cerebrum.

[8]

7 FUTURE ENHANCEMENT: [9]

Scientists are as of now utilizing cerebrum PC interfaces to help the handicapped, treat infections like Parkinson's and Alzheimer's, and give treatment to misery and posttraumatic anxiety issue. Work is under route on gadgets that may in the end let you speak with companions clairvoyantly, provide for you superhuman listening to and vision or even give you a chance to download information specifically into your cerebrum, a la "The Matrix."At the base of this innovation is the 3-pound generator we all convey in our mind. It creates power at the microvolt level. Be that as it may the signs are sufficiently solid to move robots, wheelchairs andprosthetic appendages - with the assistance of an outside processor.

[10]

[11]

[12]

8 REFERENCES: [1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

R. C. Simpson, E. F. LoPresti, and R. A. Cooper, ―How many people would benefit from a smart wheelchair?‖ Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 53–71, 2008.

T. Carlson and Y. Demiris, ―Collaborative control for a robotic wheelchair: Evaluation of performance, attention, and workload,‖ IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B: Cybernetics, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 876–888, 2012.

B. Rebsamen, C. Guan, H. Zhang, C. Wang, C. Teo, M. Ang, and E.Burdet, ―A brain controlled wheelchair to navigate in familiar environments,‖ IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, vol. 18, no. 6, pp.

590–598, dec. 2010.

I. Iturrate, J. Antelis, A. Kubler, and J. Minguez, ―A noninvasive brain-¨ actuated wheelchair based on a P300 neurophysiological protocol and automated navigation,‖ IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 614–627, june 2009.

J. d. R. Millan, F. Gal´ an, D. Vanhooydonck, E. Lew, J. Philips, and´ M. Nuttin, ―Asynchronous non-invasive brain-actuated control of an intelligent wheelchair,‖ in Proc. 31st Annual Int. Conf. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc., 2009, pp.

3361–3364.

J. d. R. Millan, F. Renkens, J. Mouri´ no, and W. Gerstner, ―Noninvasive˜ brain-actuated control of a mobile robot by human EEG,‖IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 1026–1033, 2004.

[13]

[14]

[15]

[16]

[17]

27

F. Galan, P. W. Ferrez, F. Oliva, J. Gu´ ardia, and J. d. R. Mill` an, ―Feature´ extraction for multiclass BCI using canonical variates analysis,‖ in IEEE IntSymp Intelligent Signal Processing, 2007.

J. d. R. Millan, P. W. Ferrez, F. Gal´ an, E. Lew, and R. Chavarriaga,´ ―Non-invasive brainmachine interaction,‖ Int J Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence, vol. 22, no. 5, pp.

959–972, 2008.

S. Perdikis, H. Bayati, R. Leeb, and J. d. R. Millan, ―Evidence accumulation in asynchronous BCI,‖ International Journal of Bioelectromagnetism, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 131– 132, 2011.

G. Lucas, ―A tutorial and elementary trajectory model for the differential steering system of robot wheel actuators,‖ The Rossum Project, Tech.

Rep., May 2000. [Online]. Available: T. Dutta and G. Fernie, ―Utilization of ultrasound sensors for anticollision systems of powered wheelchairs,‖ IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 24–32, March 2005.

S. Beucher, ―The watershed transformation applied to image segmentation,‖ Scanning Microscopy International, vol. 6, pp. 299–314, 1992.J. Borenstein and Y. Koren, ―The vector field histogram - fast obstacle avoidance for mobile robots,‖ IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 278–288, 1991.

G. Schoner, M. Dose, and C. Engels, ―Dynamics of behavior: Theory and applications for autonomous robot architectures,‖ Robot.

Autonomous Syst., vol. 16, pp. 213 – 245, 1995.

L. Tonin, T. Carlson, R. Leeb, and J. d. R. Millan, ―Brain-controlled´ telepresence robot by motor-disabled people,‖ in Proc. Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society EMBC 2011, 2011, pp. 4227–4230.

Hoffmann U, Vesin J-M, Ebrahimi T, Diserens K. An efficient P300-based brain-computer interface for disabled subjects. J NeurosciMethods.2008[PubMed] [Cross Ref] S.ten Hagen and B. Krose, ―Trajectory reconstruction for selflocalization and map building,‖ in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, vol. 2, 2002, pp. 1796 – 1801 vol.2.

D. Norman, The Design of Everyday Things.

Doubleday Business, 2002.

Obermaier, B., Neuper, C., Guger, C. and Pfurtscheller, G. 2001. Information transfer rate in a five-classes brain-computer interface. IEEE Trans NeuSyst Rehab Eng 9 (3), 283-288. [2] Pfurtscheller, G. and Neuper, C. 2001. Motor

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR TRENDS IN ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY VOLUME 5 ISSUE 1 – MAY 2015 - ISSN: 2349 - 9303 [18]

[19]

[20]

[21]

imagery and direct brain-computer communication. Proc IEEE 89, 1123 1134.

Blankertz, B., MĦOOHU-/K.R., Curio, G., Vaughan, T.M., Schalk, G., Wolpaw, J.R., Schlogl, A., Neuper, C., Pfurtscheller, G., Hinterberger, T., Schroder M. and Birbaumer, N. 2004. The BCI Competition 2003: Progress and perspectives in detection and discrimination of EEG single trials. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 51(6), 1044-1051.

Ramoser, H., 0ĦOOHU-Gerking, J. , and Pfurtscheller, G. 2003. Optimal spatial filtering of single trial EEG during imagined hand movement. IEEE Trans Rehab Eng 8 (4), 441446.

R. C. Simpson, E. F. LoPresti, and R. A. Cooper, ―How many people would benefit from a smart wheelchair?‖ Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 53–71, 2008.

T. Carlson and Y. Demiris, ―Collaborative control for a robotic wheelchair: Evaluation of

[22]

[23]

[24]

28

performance, attention, and workload,‖ IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B: Cybernetics, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 876–888, 2012.

B. Rebsamen, C. Guan, H. Zhang, C. Wang, C. Teo, M. Ang, and E.Burdet, ―A brain controlled wheelchair to navigate in familiar environments,‖ IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, vol. 18, no. 6, pp.

590–598, dec. 2010.

I. Iturrate, J. Antelis, A. Kubler, and J. Minguez, ―A noninvasive brain-¨ actuated wheelchair based on a P300 neurophysiological protocol and automated navigation,‖ IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 614–627, june 2009.

J. d. R. Millan, F. Gal´ an, D. Vanhooydonck, E. Lew, J. Philips, and´ M. Nuttin, ―Asynchronous non-invasive brain-actuated control of an intelligent wheelchair,‖ in Proc. 31st Annual Int. Conf. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc., 2009, pp.

3361–3364.