Public Private Partnership (PPP) for Efficient Water Management in Urban and Rural Areas

Page 1

PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP (PPP) FOR EFFICIENT WATER MANAGEMENT IN URBAN AND RURAL AREAS Time: 13:30 hrs. to 15:30 hrs.


PRIVATE SECTOR PARTICIPATION IN WATER SERVICE PROVISION Incorporating Social Policies in Water Contract Design

K. Vishnu Mohan Rao Coordinator Citizen consumer and civic Action Group (CAG) Email: vishnu@cag.org.in, kvishnurao@gmail.com


AGENDA  Growth

of Private Sector Participation (PSP) in Water Service Provision  Regulatory Framework 

Regulatory Organisations 

With examples

Incorporating Social Policy in Contracts 

With examples

 Conclusion


INTRODUCTION Water - public good and vital for human needs  Subsidies and social tariffs – Social policies  ‘Government failure’ – Private Sector Participation (PSPs) – 

Management, lease/affermage and concession contracts  Efficiency of private sector and at affordable rates for reasonable rate of return 

But high water tariffs & break-down in PSP contracts  Indian context - Jawaharlal Nehru Urban Renewal Mission (JNNURM) ‘full cost recovery’/affordability  Need to strengthen regulatory framework 


REGULATORY FRAMEWORK FOR SOCIAL POLICIES 

Set of rules and processes that bind the water and sanitation service providers, Formal rules (laws, contracts, bylaws, etc.) and  Informal rules (personal commitments, financial incentives, reputation, etc.).  Allocations of main regulatory/monitoring functions to various institutions (Tremolet, 2006) 

Regulatory Institutions – (Stern and Holder, 1999) State ownership - ministries or departments, project management unit to monitor outsourced O&M contracts. Jordan – PMU, Regulatory Office, Directorate Office  Private ownership - independent regulatory agency (Walker report, 2009) –Regulatory Board 


SOCIAL POLICIES IN PSP CONTRACT DESIGN  PSP

Contracts differ in risks and responsibilities  Social policies in PSP contracts - structure to contracts in favour of poorer citizens 1. Market Structure and competition     

Exclusivity – reasonable rate of return Drawback - Cherry Picking” - Restrictive entry of new firms hamper provision of services to the poor a) Social Policy - alternate service providers to serve unserved areas – slums, unprofitable areas Amman, Jordan – licence to private operators to serve unserved areas Abidjan, Cote d’ Ivoire, Private Operator grants licences to the small scale water vendors.


1. MARKET STRUCTURE AND COMPETITION  b)

Social Policy  Increasing Coverage targets/ Universal service obligations to prevent cherry picking 

E.g. Cochabamba, Bolivia, - five-year moving targets until 100 percent water and wastewater network coverage Gabon - Five-year increasing targets differentiating (different targets between main cities and rural areas)


2. SERVICE STANDARDS

2.1Tariff Structure  Rate of return on the capital invested by charging all consumer proportional to their usage  Drawback- Affordability/Willingness to Pay  Social Policy - increasing block tariff, cross-subsidies    

No. of blocks, volume of water, block prices Cote D’ Ivoire- social connection and a social tariff block for consumption La Paz and El Alto, Bolivia - Social tariff – first volume 30 m³ consumed each month Special categories – pensioners, special groups


2. SERVICE STANDARDS 2.2 Subsidies - targeted/untargeted  Drawback - Very high connection fees  Social policy - Connection subsidy – free connection or subsidised rates 

La Paz El Alto, Bolivia - Reduced either by exchanging connection fee payment by community work Connection fees in monthly instalments with US $ 15 as down payment with a US $ 5 monthly instalment spread over 60 months. Jakarta, Indonesia – 12/24 months instalments


2. SERVICE STANDARDS

2.3 Water Quality  Drawback - Stringent abstraction and discharge guidelines/standards  Social Policy - Trade-off between investment and quality standards  Low cost technologies to reach the poor, adopt indigenous technologies low pressure pumps/cooperative standpipes/yard-tap Paraguay – 

low-cost technologies, using simple well-drilling , techniques and plastic hosing.  Reduction in installation costs of small water networks to US$250 per person, 


3. SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITIES  Depends

on the type of PSP contract  Management Contracts- Providing Technical /financial expertise  Concession/Affermage/Lease - Developing Propoor schemes when Government policies are not in place Social policy - Allowing alternate service providers to sell water services  e.g. Manila, Philippines - Manila Water Ltd Tubig Para Sa Barangay (TPSB) and Maynilad Water Services (Water for Poor Communities )  Cote d’ Ivoire - Water resellers are authorized to build small networks and pay bulk supply tariffs instead of the normal rising-block tariff 


THANK YOU

Contact Details – vishnu@cag.org.in, kvishnurao@gmail.com


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.