3 s i n ce 1 9 2
de n ts
I
A v o ic e f
u 2t3 s or
I
I‘ olani m a mua olani
mua
19 Av ce oice n i s for students
What’s Inside?
Arts and Entertainment: Aerial dancing pg. 7
D ecember 16, 2010 September 28, 2010 onolulu, Hawaii Hawaii H Honolulu, V olume 86, Volume 86,Issue Issue2 1
What’s Inside? Lower School--2 A&E-3 Lighter Side--4 Sports-5, 12 Edito-
Read more online: www.imuaonline.org
Students sour on costly candy
By Steven Yee Ian Wong maneuvered the cart past the magazines and empty baskets. Wong ‘12 was helping his mom with grocery shopping. He saw the colorful boxes of candy just before the black conveyor-belt. “My mom said, ‘You can pick any candy you want, dear.’ “I said, ‘That’s ok. I’ll pass.” Wong recalled. The prices of candy bars sold in Iolani vending machines have risen 47 percent over the past four years. “I would buy it if it were 60 cents instead of $1.25,” said Wong. The extra 60 cents isn’t worth it to him, especially in this tight economy. Wong is aware of the unhealthy aspects of candy. An avid runner, he tries to avoid the extra calories. His favorite candy bar is Tiger’s Milk, marketed as a healthy snack. According to Tiger’s Milk’s website, their peanut butter 35
grams (1.3 ounces) bar has six grams of protein. According to Self NutritionData, a normal 57 grams (2.0 ounces) Snickers has four grams of protein. For Wong, it’s a no-brainer. As long as he’s eating something unhealthy, he wants to be as healthy as he can. Reid Sagawa, a guidance counselor and health teacher at ‘Iolani, said that for children born after 2000, one in three will have type 2 diabetes. Wong does not want to be in that one-third. Wong’s reaction to candy is typical of many students here at ‘Iolani. Most Iolani students are buying less candy than they used to because of the increased price and, to a lesser extent, their increased awareness of what is healthy and what isn’t. Mr. Wada, the General Manager of Sodexho Marriott Services Food Services at the ‘Iolani School cafeteria, said that people are buying less candy than they did four years ago. Wada thinks
that students are more aware of the nutritional values of candy. He also thinks that the price increase is a factor for the decline in candy sales. Prices have risen about 45-50 percent over the last four years. Not all students are following this trend. Darin Poei ‘12 has noticed the price of Reese’s peanut butter cups, his favorite candy, has gone up to $1.25 from 85 cents. “It’s worth the extra quarter because it’s delicious,” he said. Despite Poei’s undiminished appetite for sweets, Mr. Sagawa feels proud that students are eating less candy. In his ninth grade health classes, he teaches students about the nutritional values of foods like candy and soda. “We’re making a difference in bringing about an awareness [of nutrition] in students,” said Mr. Sagawa. He does not think that all sugary or salty snacks should be banned from the snack bars. By exposing students to these things
now, ‘Iolani is giving teens the option to eat healthily or not. If they can learn to choose healthy foods now, students are more likely to be healthier in the future, Mr. Sagawa said. Serena Li ‘11 is a student who is aware of the monetary and nutritional costs of candy. “I don’t think they [Sodexho] should jack up the prices so much,” said Li. She understands that the economy is down and that Sodexho is trying to maintain its profit. But the increases are “out of proportion.” “I do feel pretty upset,” said Li, “I don’t think it’s fair, but there’s nothing we [students] can do about it.” Mr. Sagawa allows students to eat in his classes with one catch; they can only consume healthy foods or drink water. He recommends they eat fruit or granola bars. In the future, maybe students will ditch the Butterfingers for some fresh grapes.
Division II to Division I: Is it time to move up?
By Guthrie Angeles
Sports: Football Special pg. 8 & 12
Holiday spirit kicks up pg. 6 & 10
Index
Editorials--4 Sports-8, 12 A&E--7 Lighter Side--9 Lower School--11 Features-2,3,5
After `Iolani had just won its fourth consecutive Division II state championship, I heard the same question repeatedly asked by several people watching the game at Aloha Stadium: So, why aren’t we in Div. I? After all, with our football team’s repeated success in Division II over the last few years, wouldn’t it make sense for the team to seek better competition in Division I? The question of `Iolani’s place in the Hawaii high school football community has recently become a controversial one. Since the inception of Division II state football in 2003, the Raiders have won five of the last six championships and four in a row. Isn’t it obvious that the football team needs to move up? Well, actually, no. In fact, many people at `Iolani and elsewhere have differing opinions on the subject. Unlike divisions of most mainland schools, which are divided by school enrollment, the divisions of Hawaii high school football are set up based on performance and success. Traditionally, better teams play in Division I, plain and simple. This is where the debate starts. `Iolani’s success in the last few years has led to repeated calls for relocation to Division I. However, those opinions rarely come from students on our campus. For this
story, few students at `Iolani were willing to argue for the football team to move up to Division I. However, many local sports websites and forums reflect the opinion that the Raiders really belong with more challenging competition. “After winning the Division II championship for four years in a row, what else does this school and this coach have to prove?” said HanamauluBoy in a comment on staradvertiser.com. “The state championships were set up to give smaller schools in Division II the opportunity to compete.” Another commenter said ‘Iolani would find greater fulfillment with victory in the top division. “Winning the Division I [championship] one day would mean more than four Division II championships,” morethoughts said on staradvertiser.com. But Coach Wendell Look argues that player size--and not team success--is the deciding factor in the team’s Division II placement. The average weight for an `Iolani football player is 174 pounds compared to an average of 192 pounds for players at an average Division I school like Farrington. In addition, `Iolani’s roster has 11 players of 200 or more pounds, while Farrington and St. Louis have 19 and 36, respectively. “If we were consitently able to get bodies like Seali`i Epenesa [‘10] and Kaena Moose [‘10],
Zoe Palmer | Imua ‘Iolani Senior Reid Saito intercepted a pass and ran back 100 yards for a touchdown. The Raiders overwhelmed fellow Div. II team Pac-5 in their Sept. 17 game. then our options would be better to move to Division I,” Look said. “But with linemen under 200 lbs, it is unreasonable to subject our players to that kind of abuse.” “We shouldn’t be punished for our success,” Look said. “Success comes through a lot of hard work, sacrifice, and dedication on these players’ parts.” Of course, the most obvious reason for the team to remain in Division II is simple logistics. The ILH has six teams, three in Division I, three in Division II. Simply, if ‘Iolani were to move up, some one else would have to move down. And if four teams were D-I, Pac-5 and Damien would be stuck playing each other every other
week. A realignment just wouldn’t make any sense. Another solution, mentioned by Ferd Lewis in an article in the Honolulu Star-Advertiser is that `Iolani belongs in Division “I.V,” somewhere between D-II and D-I. According to Lewis, the three-division system is “similar to the one proposed by Kamehameha-Hawaii athletic director Bob Wagner” but is not likely to happen in the near future for “financial reasons.” There may be no clear solution to the team’s division placement. Both sides have valid arguments for and against the move. Until a better system is in place, we’ll continue to watch the Raiders dominate their division and opponents.