Position
Monitors, and the understanding about the requirements and authority in submitting a complaint report; 3. Continuity: less funding and small number of the monitors, and the limited scope of monitoring in forest SVLK are not able to be targeted to other fields, such as the monitoring of palm oil certification. From those three problems, Hasyim (2017) provides advice on the 5 domains, they are: monitoring report simplification so that the community can report it; the certainty of follow up from the government and other authorities of the monitoring report; information openness assurance from the government and other authority; interaction improvement between certification bodies and unit management, and the Government provides and facilitates monitoring fund from various sources.
People Monitor From many problems and advices from Hasyim (2017), we try to combine it with the Minister of Forestry and Environment’s statement we have said before. We would like to highlight a keyword in the SVLK success which is said by the Minister of Forestry and Environment, that is ‘long term commitment’. In our opinion, a commitment moreover a long term commitment is close related to the interest of those stakeholders. So, the interest basis is equal with the commitment. As said by Ian Scoones, a rural expert, ‘interest politics has a central role in shaping structural conditions that is determined our lives’. Let’s look at the surface concerning interest politics in various SVLK actors. The Government as the regulator and the state’s representative has an interest to provide institution, organization, policies for a better forestry governance; certification body has an interest to get certification clients from forest or timber industries, timber processing industries, and exporter from Indonesia; sellers and buyers of legal certified timber has a business interest; and environmentalist has a nature conservation. Environmentalists 11
