MASS TRANSIT
vOtAMUtv/~
r~
V~
f ~ ~~ \
~0 ~~ ~ L ~ I ~
~
.f)
~
A Report to the Citizens of Jacksonville. Summer 1983
SCOPE OF THE STUDY
. Fare structure . Existing and p:>tential
This study was lJ"Idertaken to determine \\hether mass transit is a necessary public service in Jacksonville. If it is, row shall it be subsidized and \\hat strategies might increase efficiency? If not, \\hat alternatives might be used in lieu of mass transit?
need for mass transit
~
. Current
ridership
patterns
of financial
supp:>rt
. Alternative
modes of transportation
used
elsewhere
.
The scope of the study included a review and analysis of:
. The current mass transit system . Current and p:>tential consume rs and thei r
sources
Existing transportation
p:>licies
The Jacksonville Transp:>rtation Autrority UTA) is resp:>nsible for operating a mass transportation sys tem fo r the rapid trans fe r of la rge numbers of people to the va rious locat ions of res idence, commerce, industry, education and services in the City of Jacksonville.
I
HIGHLIGHTS MAJOR
.
RECOMMENDED
PROBLEMS
No clear transp:>rtation
on
p:>licy
Mass transit systems fa rebox alone
of
future
not able to survive
mass
SOLUTIONS
. Develop
clear p:>licies aimed at use of mass trans it
increasing
Seek a variety of funding sources federal, state and local governments
from
the from
1
- Current
federal
p:>licy to reduce financial
supp:>rt
- State
p:>licy operations
! ,
t
I
. .
.
not
to
fund
mass
transit
\
Relatively dispersed low density difficult and expensive to serve Inequitable
fare
Elected officials' decisions of JTA Plans limited express.
p:>pulat ion
structure influence
to buses and.
over
operational
automated
skyway
. Institute . .
zone fa res
Implement Confine review
. Develop jitneys
a transfer Council
system
ove rview
to
annua I
a varied mass transit system and vans to serve outlying areas
budget
using