ADS
ALGORITHMIC JOURNAL PART B
AIR
2016, SEMESTER 1, CANHUI CHEN JIAYUN KE 621409
CONTENTS Criteria Design B.1. Research Field Biomimicry B.2. Case Study 1.0 Biothing Seroussi Pavilion B.3. Case Study 2.0
B.4. Technique: Development B.5. Technique: Prototypes B.6. Technique: Proposal B.7. Learning Objectives and Outcomes B.8. Appendix B.9. Reference
CRITERIA DESIGN
B.1. DESIGN FIELD: BIOMIMICRY
“The Organisms save energy, what demonstrates the truly sustainability, the only real model that has been in the planet over long periods of time is the ecological world.”1 -Janine Benyus
1. Janine Benyus, (Ted Talk Biomimicry in Action, 2009) < https://www.ted.com/talks/janine_benyus_biomimicry_in_action?language=en# 58
CRITERIA DESIGN
Architecture is moving towards sustainability due to the natural resource over-consumption and damage caused by human. It is time to begin to think about how to utilize our design to fit in the future and being sustainable in order to avoid the future generation not being able to survive with enough resources. Itâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s fortunate to see that human begins to realize the importance of the biological entities. As we are not the first one to build houses for youth and to social/work within large commnity. The ecological organisms are now been awared by human due to their long-lasting sustainble existence. In Ted Talk, Janine Benyus clarified that the truly sustainble model has been in the planet over long periods of time is the ecological world. In the past millions of years, their existence didnâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;t effect the surrounding environments negatively. Biomimicry is used in current design flexibly due to distinction of each biological characteristics. It refers to nature as model, and it is a new science that studies natureâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s models and then imitates or takes inspiration from these designs and processes to solve human problems. It not only mimicks the forms of the natural appearance, bu also imitates the biological behaviour to create sustainable outcomes. Therefore, I would like to use Biomimicry as the field of my design. I will integrate this design term with the biological characteristics to provide sustainable opportunities for Merri Creek.
CRITERIA DESIGN
59
ICD/ITKE Research Pavilion
University of Stuttgart, 2013-2014
60
CRITERIA DESIGN
B.1. BIOMIMICRY DESIGN The ICD/ITKE Pavilion 2013-2014 is a good example that shows how Biomimicry influences the design implication&opportunities and the fabrication.
FIG.1: BETTLE SPECIMEN SCANNED
This project was inspired by the shells of beetles, in order to develop a light weight panelized canopy. Beetles are winged insects that have tough outer wings like a shield. All beetles have two sets of wings their body is covered by a hard shell (called an elytra) that protects the thin wings underneath. Therefore, the design mimicks the biological characteristic of the shells of beetles. The outer shell made by steel frame (hard shell) is strengthened by the carbon fibers (thin wings underneath) so that it results in a stable structure that can withstand the mechanical stresses.
FIG.2: FIBER LAYOUT FOR ONE COMPONENT
FIG.3: INTEGRATION OF MULTIPLE PROCESS PARAMETERS INTO A COMPONENT BASED CONSTRUCTION SYSTEM
FIG.4: FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF GLOBAL FORCE FLOWS AND THEIR TRANSFER INTO STRUCTUAL CARBON FIBER REINFORCEMENT
FABRICATION The project took this biological production process to create the fiber-reinforced structures by using KUKA robots to wind glass and carbon fibers around the thin steel frames. The research pavilion also tested the limit in lightweight construction as they used a robust double layered construction that accounts for potential extra loading through the facade system.2 They used the coreless winding technique to reduce the mold consumption, therefore material effecient. 2. Interview with ICD/ITKE team on fiber-woven research pavilion 2013-14 (ERCO, 2014) <http://www. designboom.com/architecture/icd-itke-research-pavilion-2013-14-interview-08-18-2014/archdaily. com/770516/icd-itke-research-pavilion-2014-15-icd-itke-university-of-stuttgart CRITERIA DESIGN
61
62
CRITERIA DESIGN
B.2
CASE STUDY Biothing Seriossi Pavilion
CRITERIA DESIGN
63
BIOTHING SERIOUSSI PAVILION
3. Seroussi Pavilion I Biothing arch20, 2007) <http://www.arch2o.com/seroussi-pavilion-biothing/
64
CRITERIA DESIGN
DESIGN The Biothing Serioussi Pavilion is a ground pavilion project located in Muedon. The design was inspired by the local sculpture habitacles. It is a structure seen as grown from self-modifying patterns of vectors based on electromagnetic Fields. 3 The project mimicks the ecological generating process and apply the idea into the deisgn. Therefore, the dynamic nature of the design reflects the parametric relationship between parts and the deep ecology of algorithmic relationships. On the other hand, the concept of the project has the idea of indeterminacy to integrate in the structure in order to organize the spatial pattern and generative fabric. The computational method provides the advantage to the designers to achieve the complexity and the self-modifying patterns. The project is a good example of using computational design to create generative design.
PROGRESS The initial computations (arrange the attention and repulsion) were done in plan view then lifed via microarching sections. At the meantime, the designers applyed different frequencies to create the complex and diverse pattern. The branch curve from the divided point can be extended or growed in different way based on the variable field condition. To allow for local adaption to site conditions, additional features were added to the generating script. Therefore, the microbiological structure is fromed and constructed by the complex line charge. This project attracts me as the pavilion has a sense of separation due to the volume is defined by line charge but it is also an organic unit due to its clear structure.
CRITERIA DESIGN
65
66
CRITERIA DESIGN
LINE CHARGE AND BOUNDARY
CRITERIA DESIGN
67
68
CRITERIA DESIGN
LINE CHARGE AND PAT TERN
CRITERIA DESIGN
69
70
CRITERIA DESIGN
POINT CHARGE AND SPIN FORCE
CRITERIA DESIGN
71
FLAT PATTERN 3D
SHELL PATTERN
DIATOM PATTERN
FLAT PATTERN
FLAT PATTERN
FLAT PATTERN
72
CRITERIA DESIGN
3 D POINT CHARGE
CRITERIA DESIGN
73
B.2
SELECTED OUTCOME Selected Criteria Iâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;m planning to design a structure (mimicking the function and form of the Marine Microorganism- Diatom) suspended instream near the waterbank of the Creek from Merri to Northcote. The brief is to create an instream structure which has the function of biomimetic filter to increase the level of turbidity of selected site so that light is able to penetrate the waters to permit photosynthesis and sustain food sources for fauna from in-stream and surrounding wetlands. Therefore, my selection criteria is the structure that has smooth and fruid form in order to not only allow the fishes to swim through underwater, but also provide the birds from wetlands to drop by. The 4 terations that I chose all have fruid and smooth forms.
Design Potential
The iterations might be helpful for generating the fruid form which I would attach in the Creek. Thus, the material to construct the structure must be waterproof. However, as the itertions are mostly in point/line charge, the consturcting process would probably be a problem. I might use powder printing or use flexible materials such as polyethylene or fibre.
74
CRITERIA DESIGN
This shape formed by line charge seems like the structure of the marine microorganism which is interesting. However, it is rather to be seen as pattern in stead of an organic structural unit.
The shapes in the cluster at the central part appears like mountain. Thus the whole structure looks stablized.
The shape is quite organic and flexible. I might be able to use this kind of swirling and fluid shape to mimick the swarm intelligence and it might achieve my design proposal of building an underwater structure.
The line charge component enables to define the boundary and make a clear arrangement of the elements. As the lightest curvy strips appear as the primary load bearing structures and the parts growing from the central points seem like the secondary structures, this would be helpful in constructing the physical structure.
CRITERIA DESIGN
75
76
CRITERIA DESIGN
B.3 CASE STUDY
CRITERIA DESIGN
77
78
CRITERIA DESIGN
CRITERIA DESIGN
79
80
CRITERIA DESIGN
B.8
ALGORITHMIC SKETCHES Introducing Parameter Space, Data Types and Functions
Demonstrating Controllers, Samplers and Fields
CRITERIA DESIGN
81
BY US AND P USED
82
CRITERIA DESIGN
RUTTEN WEBINAR
SING CULL PAT TERN IN DIFFERENT VEC TOR, IT COULD CRE ATE SEC TION PROFILE OF HUMAN FACE. THIS USEFUL ME THOD COULD ALSO BE D TO CRE ATE MOVIE POSTER IN BINARY CODE EXPRESSION.
CRITERIA DESIGN
83
RUTTEN WEBINAR
BY USING BREP-PL ANE ON CER TAIN GEOME TRY AND CO-ORPER ATE WITH PROXIMIT Y 3D TO FROM THIS.
84
CRITERIA DESIGN
CRITERIA DESIGN
85
86
CRITERIA DESIGN
WEEK 4 MODELAB INTRODUCTORY
CRITERIA DESIGN
87
FIELD FUNDAMENTALS BASICS
88
CRITERIA DESIGN
CRITERIA DESIGN
89
90
CRITERIA DESIGN
FIELD FUNDAMENTALS
CRITERIA DESIGN
91
FRACTAL TETRAHEDRA
92
CRITERIA DESIGN
CRITERIA DESIGN
93
FRACTAL TETRAHEDRA
BY CO-OPER ATING SIMPLE BREP COMPONENT AND OTHER COMMAND SUCH AS SCALE OR TRIM CAN ACHIE VE COMPLEX SHAPES LIKE THIS.
94
CRITERIA DESIGN
CRITERIA DESIGN
95
WEEK 5 EVALUATING FIELDS
96
CRITERIA DESIGN
CRITERIA DESIGN
97
EVALUATING FIELDS
98
CRITERIA DESIGN
CRITERIA DESIGN
99
100
CRITERIA DESIGN
EVALUATING FIELDS
BY arranging the point charge and line charge to modify different outcomes.
CRITERIA DESIGN
101
102
CRITERIA DESIGN
GRAPH CONTROLLERS
CRITERIA DESIGN
103
IMAGE SAMPLING
104
CRITERIA DESIGN
CRITERIA DESIGN
105