11-03-30: Uri Rosenthal: Min. Foreign Affairs: Incomplete Response to Jus Sanguinis Petition by Andrea Muhrrteyn

30 March 2011 Mr. Uri Rosenthal Minister of Foreign Affairs PO Box 20061, 2500 EB The Hague, The Netherlands

Ref: (i) Bosman Family descendants Jus Sanguinis Application for Dutch Citizenship in April 2010; (ii) 05 December 2010 and 08 March 2011 Jus Sanguinis Petition to Kingdom of Netherlands

c/o & via: Mr. Wouter Jurgens Head of Political Affairs Netherlands Embassy Pretoria Tel: (012) 4254522 | Fax: (012) 4254521 CC: CC: CC: CC: CC: CC: CC: CC: CC: CC: CC: CC: CC: CC: CC:

Prime Minister Mark Rutte, Council of Ministers of the Netherlands Hon. Amb. Z.E. dhr. Rob de Vos, Koninkrijk der Nederlanden Ambassade, Pretoria Mr. Geert Wilders, Partij voor de Vrijheid (PVV) Mr. Kees van der Staaij, Staatkundige Gereformeerde Partij (SGP) Mr. Mark Rutte, People’s Party for Freedom and Democracy (VVD) Mr. Job Cohen, Labour Party (PvdA) Ms. Sadhia Rafi, European Legal Network on Asylum Netherlands Coordinator Mr. Ben Vermeulen, Prof. Constitutional Law, Vrije Univ. Amsterdam Prof. Cees Groendijk, Katholieke Univ. Nijmegen Perm. Comm. van Deskundigen in Intnl vreemdelingen Vluchtelingen en Strafrecht Dr. Thomas Spijkerboer, Vrije Univ. Amsterdam Board of Directors, Federation of Refugee Organisations in Netherlands Board of Directors, Greenpeace International Prof. Gerard-Rene de Groot, Maastricht Univ, Nationality Law expert UN High Commissioner for Refugees, Regional UNHCR Office in Den Haag

RE: Circumstances and Legal Arguments of Ministry of Foreign Affairs Incomplete Response to Jus Sanguinis Petition Arguments: Request Full Written Reasons clarifying the alleged errors of fact or of law made in the Jus Sanguinis Petition and Briefing Paper submitted to Netherlands Government Overview: 

Summary of Jus Sanguinis Dutch Citizenship Events & Correspondence



Clarify Ministry of Foreign Affairs allegations of Jus Sanguinis Erroneous facts or legal arguments in African White Refugee letter to Netherlands Ambassador



Updated Circumstances Confirm International Refugee Agency discrimination against, and endorsement of, censorship of ‘White Refugee’ facts and arguments.

Boer Volkstaat; or Jus Sanguinis Right-of-Return, for African White Refugees ·§· www.jussanguinis.com PO Box 5042 George East, RSA, 6539 ·§· Cell: +27 (71) 170 1954 ·§· www.african-white-refugees.co.nr



Updated Peak Oil and/or Netherlands Circumstances: Is the Netherlands Government’s support for Military Intervention in Libya founded on Peak Oil motives; or Humanitarian motives?



Are the Netherlands Humanitarian Concerns for their SA Descendants to endorse the ANC’s Black Liberation Theology Reconciliation on their Dutch settler rotting corpses?

Summary of Jus Sanguinis Dutch Citizenship Events & Correspondence On 28 March 2009, the editor of the Algemene Dagblad, wrote an article Ons woon baie lekker in Holland1, where he referred to recent changes in Dutch laws, which provide Afrikaners who are direct descendants of Dutch citizens, to reclaim their Dutch citizenship. The article tells the story of South Africans Hendrik and Lynette de Vries, from Voorburg; whose progenitor left Den Haag in the 18th century. “Steeds meer blanke Zuid-Afrikanen vragen een Nederlands paspoort aan. Dat komt vooral doordat de Nederlandse wetgeving Afrikaners de mogelijkheid biedt de nationaliteit van hun voorouders aan te nemen, segt de Nederlandse ambassade in Pretoria.”

The article was reposted on the blog of Dutch/South African journalist, Adriana Stuijt: Afrikaners with proof of Dutch roots eligible for NL passports… 2, and a Dutch website: OnsVirJou: “We live very well in Holland”3 After researching my family tree, I applied to the Dutch Consul, in April 2010. I provided the Dutch consul with the completed form: Assessment Regarding Eligibility for a Dutch Citizenship/Passport4, to which I attached the details of my direct genealogical history from my Dutch Stamvader: Hermanus Bosman (19/04/1682 – 26/07/1769) who emigrated from Holland, arriving in the Cape on 19 April 1707; son of Lambertus Bosman (1655 – 1713) and Maria Fransz (1656 – 1722) of among others Utrechse Straat, Amsterdam. On 21 April 2010, Ms. Ineke Solinas, from the Dutch Consul responded with the report from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Den Haag, Nederland: Er zijn geen recente wijzigingen geweest in het Nederlands nationaliteitsrecht waaruit volgt dat Zuid-Afrikanen met Nederlandse voorouders recht hebben op de Nederlandse nationaliteit puur en alleen op basis van de Nederlandse roots zonder zelf in het bezit te zijn van het Nederlanderschap. Er zijn drie mogelijkheden te verzinnen op grond waarvan er Zuid-Afrikanen zijn die thans ook in het bezit zijn van de Nederlandse nationaliteit terwijl ze al generaties lang of geruime tijd in Zuid-Afrika wonen: -Men is als Nederlander naar Zuid-Afrika gekomen, is niet Zuid-Afrikaan geworden, heeft kennisgevingen afgelegd of paspoorten aangevraagd om het Nederlanderschap onder destijds geldende Nederlandse nationaliteitswetgeving te behouden, vervolgens door afstamming de Nederlandse nationaliteit doorgegeven aan de volgende generatie en die weer naar de generatie daarna met inachtneming van alle voorwaarden om verlies van het Nederlanderschap te voorkomen door het afleggen van opties en dergelijke;

http://www.ad.nl/ad/nl/1012/Binnenland/article/detail/308209/2009/03/27/Ons-woon-baie-lekker-in-Holland.dhtml http://censorbugbear-reports.blogspot.com/2009/10/afrikaners-with-proof-of-dutch-roots.html http://www.onsvirjou.nl/2011/03/23/ons-woon-baie-lekker-in-holland/?lang=en 4 http://issuu.com/js-ror/docs/110417_applic_bosman_jussanguinis?mode=a_p 2 3

-Men is op een gegeven moment vrijwillig Zuid-Afrikaan geworden voor 1 april 2003 met verlies van het Nederlanderschap tot gevolg en kan sinds 1 april 2003 onder bepaalde voorwaarden de Nederlandse nationaliteit herkrijgen; of -Men heeft op een gegeven moment als afstammeling van een Nederlander én in het bezit van de Zuid-Afrikaanse nationaliteit het Nederlanderschap automatisch door langdurig verblijf in geboorteland Zuid-Afrika verloren tussen 1 januari 1985 en 1 april 2003, maar de Nederlandse nationaliteit onder bepaalde voorwaarden hebben kunnen herkrijgen. Met andere woorden, Zuid-Afrikanen die enkel een beroep kunnen doen op een verre Nederlandse voorouder en dus niet onder een van de drie bovengenoemde categorieën vallen, kunnen thans niet op een eenvoudige wijze Nederlander worden. Ik stuur de post een cc toe van dit bericht met de hoop dat zij mij misschien het een en ander kunnen verduidelijken m.b.t. wat het AD bedoeld zou kunnen hebben.

There are no recent changes in the Dutch Nationality law, providing South African citizens with Netherlands progenitors the right to Dutch citizenship, purely on the basis of Dutch roots, if they don’t already possess Dutch citizenship. There are, 'three possibilities in which South Africans could still qualify even though they have already lived for a long time in South Africa namely: "One has gone to South Africa as a Dutch citizen, did not become a South African citizen, and submitted frequent applications to the (Dutch government) reconfirming that they did not want to relinquish their Dutch citizenship; and had thus passed also along their Dutch citizenship rights to their own next generation - always maintaining all these requirements to maintain their Dutch citizenship rights by reaffirming this fact in statements and applications (over the years); One has become a South African citizen before 1 April 2003 and thus automatically had lost Dutch citizenship as a result of this. Under certain circumstances in such events, one can reapply and regain Dutch citizenship since 1 April 2003; One is a direct (descendant of a Dutch citizen and now has South African nationality and has lost Dutch nationality automatically due to long-time stay in South Africa between 1 January 1985 and 1 April 2003 - but would be able to regain Dutch citizenship under certain circumstances.' In other words, South Africans cannot rely on one distant progenitor for Dutch citizenship, if they do not fall under the aforementioned three categories. I send the post copied to the journalist who wrote the article, with the hope that he may be able to provide an explanation as to what the Algemene Dagblad meant in their report.

On 17 April 2010, I wrote a letter to Mr. Casper Naber, asking him to please provide me with the details of the recently changed Dutch nationality law, which provide South Africans who are direct descendants of Dutch citizens, to reclaim their Dutch citizenship. On 21 April 2010, I wrote a letter5 to Mr. Geert Wilders to enquire whether he was aware of these ‘recent changes in Dutch nationality law, which provide South Africans who are direct descendants of Dutch citizens, to reclaim their Dutch citizenship. On 23 April 2010, Mr. Casper Naber wrote an article Bange ‘Suid Afrikaners’ wragen Wilders om hulp6.

http://why-we-are-white-refugees.blogspot.com/2010/04/help-asseblief-graaf-wilders-royal.html http://www.ad.nl/ad/nl/1000/Nieuws/article/detail/478692/2010/04/23/Bange-Zuid-Afrikanen-smeken-om-Wilders-hulp.dhtml

Nobody has explained what Dutch Nationality laws enabled South Africans Hendrik and Lynette de Vries, from Voorburg; whose progenitor left Den Haag in the 18th century; to get Dutch citizenship. In the meantime other South Africans joined the Jus Sanguinis Right of Return to Europe; for African White Refugees7 group, and others who could prove their direct genealogical descent from a European Stamvader/progenitor joined the Petition. On 05 and 06 December 2010, the African White Refugees Jus Sanguinis Petition and Briefing Paper was submitted to various Dutch Political, Refugee, Population and Energy Experts; via the Dutch Embassy in Pretoria8. From 07 to 16 December the Petition was submitted to similar Political, Refugee, Population and Energy experts from other Jus Sanguinis Progenitor nations of France9, Germany10, United Kingdom11 and Switzerland12; and finally to NATO Military Committee13 Officials. On 21 December 2010, Mr. Jurgens responded14 by totally ignoring the TRC Fraud, Population Policy, Peak Oil, etc, etc. issues and arguments raised in the Petition and Briefing Paper, and focussing his response solely on: - with regard to the claim of refugees status, the following applies: as you are now in your own country, you cannot be considered a refugee under the Geneva Refugee Convention or under the Dutch Asylum Act. If you are outside your own country you can ask the authorities of the country in which you are now, or UNHCR/UNDP, for protection. - with regard to the application for citizenship of the Netherlands I would like to inform you that under the Dutch Nationality Law it is possible in certain cases to regain Dutch citizenship. This might be an option that is relevant in your case. Please check the website of the Netherlands Embassy for more detailed information on the Nationality Law (http://southafrica.nlembassy.org/Products_and_Services/Consular_services/Dutch_National ity)

As another legal observer noted: The downside of following that suggestion of him (and I think, that is precisely why he suggested it in the first place) is the fact that the whole issue would be rerouted along personal lines – “Mr. A” or “Mrs. B” applies to regain Dutch citizenship as individuals and, whether any one such application might be granted or refused, the whole issue remains side-tracked into stacks of individual cases. In contrast to such a situation, I believe we need to make them realise that we are dealing here with the fate of a whole people – more specifically, as far as the current Dutch Government is concerned - a people that finds itself in Southern Africa for centuries now due to Dutch decision-making and Dutch political behaviour – the fact that we are talking here of past political behaviour does not get them “off the hook” in my mind. (If current governments are not responsible for the behaviour of their predecessors and have got nothing to do with it, the current German government should not pay the Jews for Hitler’s policy; to cite but one example). Thus I think the Dutch must not continue to be able, as they had done all along, to shrug their shoulders and say “…well we put you here as farmers, medical personnel and administrators who had to serve many of our needs while we made piles of money in the East - now that you served your purpose, we are done with you; we implore you to accept 7

http://www.facebook.com/African.White.Refugees http://www.jussanguinis.com/JS-RoR/eu_netherlands.htm http://www.jussanguinis.com/JS-RoR/eu_france.htm 10 http://www.jussanguinis.com/JS-RoR/eu_germany.htm 11 http://www.jussanguinis.com/JS-RoR/eu_uk.htm 12 http://www.jussanguinis.com/JS-RoR/eu_switzerland.htm 13 http://www.jussanguinis.com/JS-RoR/eu_nato.htm 14 http://www.jussanguinis.com/JS-RoR/nl/Amb-Pta_Rob-de-Vos.htm 8 9

Black majority rule – and, by implication, also the consequences that go along with it: unspeakable hardship of murder, robbery, rape, theft, corruption, maladministration and suppression of the very culture you inherited from us”. Therefore, I think, the Dutch (especially) owe us moral and political support to regain selfgovernment…maybe they must be told exactly that?

On 11 March 2011 the amended petition and updated briefing paper (Wake Up Whitey!: African White Refugee Canaries in the International Ethno-Cultural Geopolitical Coalmine, added to hardcopy petition) was re-submitted to the Dutch Government, this time for the attention of Prime Minister Mark Rutte. On 29 March 2011, Mr. Wouter Jurgens, Head of Political Section, Royal Netherlands Embassy Pretoria responded once again totally ignoring the TRC Fraud, Population Policy, Peak Oil, etc, etc. issues and arguments raised in the Petition and Briefing Paper, repeating the contents of his previous response, in addition to: I hope that answer has been satisfactory for you. As neither the circumstances nor the legal arguments with regard to the petition have changed the embassy sees no reason to again forward the petition to the Netherlands government in The Hague. We therefore consider the matter closed. Of course we remain available to answer any further questions that you might have.

Neither Mr. Wouter Jurgens nor the Ministry of Foreign Affairs have ever clarified exactly which factual circumstances and or legal arguments in the Jus Sanguinis Petition they dispute as being factually or legally inaccurate; justifying their decision to disregard and ignore the Jus Sanguinis arguments and petition requests, as unworthy of implementation.

Clarify Ministry of Foreign Affairs allegations of Jus Sanguinis Erroneous facts or legal arguments in African White Refugee letter to Netherlands Ambassador: In Request for Transparent Official Forwarding of African White Refugees Petition to Officials and citizens of the Kingdom of Netherlands / Koninkrijk der Nederlanden: Volkstaat Secession in South Africa; or Jus Sanguinis (Right of Blood) Netherlands Citizenship for African White Refugees15, Jus Sanguinis provided the following arguments, in support of their request: [1]

Judge James Russell’s African White Refugee Assertions of Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, US State Department and British Home Office as ‘credible and trustworthy sources’ of ‘objective evidence’ regarding White Refugees is erroneous.

[2]

Censorship & Suppression of African White Refugees Documentation by International and South African Officials, Organisations and Corporations:

[3]

International Refugee Agency Response to Political & Legal Persecution of Radical Honesty culture Member in South Africa

SA Political, Academic and Media Elite Response to Political & Legal Persecution of Radical Honesty culture Member in South Africa

SA Media and Constitutional Court Response to Political & Legal Persecution of Radical Honesty culture Member in South Africa: CENSORED from public discourse.

http://www.jussanguinis.com/JS-RoR/nl/Amb-Pta_Rob-de-Vos.htm

[4]

UNHCR Response to African White Refugee Petition to Federal Court Canada, Justice’s via: Minister of Citizenship and Immigration, Canada: deliberate indifference to African White Refugees.

[5]

Conclusions and Justification for Request for Transparent Official Forwarding: International NGO’s and Government Departments, who endorse (i) the ANC / AntiApartheid Movement (AAM)’s narrative of South African Apartheid history, and/or (ii) Poverty Pimping (abnormal government-sponsored population explosions of poverty and violence) breeding wars as a tactic for power/status16; (iii) Human Rights and social justice, while ignoring, censoring or suppressing the population policy requirements for an ecological social contract (Ecolaw: the ecological carrying capacity laws of sustainability17); cannot be considered ‘credible and trustworthy sources’ of ‘objective documentary evidence’; when it comes to respectively (i) their nemesis: “Boers” (i.e. ethno-cultural conservative European Africans); and (ii) & (iii) the demographic/overpopulation ecological overshoot root causes of resource war political violence.

[6]

Please clarify the Jus Sanguinis Petitions Errors of Fact or Law regarding the aforementioned African White Refugee allegations.

Updated Circumstances confirm International EU and UN Refugee Agency discrimination against, and endorsement of censorship of ‘White Refugee’ facts and arguments. [1]

French UNHCR Rep. & EU Legal Network on Asylum (ELENA) Law Prof.'s legal allergy to Jus Sanguinis Boer Volkstaat 4 African White Refugees Petition18: Prof. Denis Alland demands that the webpage with the Jus Sanguinis petition to himself be deleted.

[2]

Prof. Denis Alland, Univ. Paris II; UNHCR Rep. (1989-97), ECRE & ELENA Refugee Law Expert Declares Legal War on African White Refugees19: Prof. Denis Alland threatens to sue Jus Sanguinis to demand that the webpage with the Jus Sanguinis petition to himself be deleted.

[3]

African White Refugee Petition to NL: ECRE & ELENA Officials posted to ECRE & ELENA Facebook Wall deleted20: European Council on Refugee's and Exiles (ECRE) and European Legal Network on Asylum (ELENA) delete the African White Refugee Petition to ECRE & ELENA: Prof: B Vermeulen; K Groenedijk; T Spijkerboer & GR de Groot (Youtube link21) from their ECRE facebook wall (twice!).

[4]

ECRE and the United Nations Objections to the Anti-White Refugee bias and discrimination behaviour of aforementioned EU and UN Refugee Agency Experts?: NONE.

Circumstances and Legal Arguments of Ministry of Foreign Affairs Response to Petition Arguments: Request Dutch Foreign Ministry provide Full Written Reasons clarifying the alleged errors of fact or of law made in the Jus 16 Their preference for ‘collateral damage’ slave and cannon fodder breeding as a policy to secure their own aggrandizement -- as opposed to population policy common sense human rights, peace and social justice ecological carrying capacity advocacy -- “committed in the context of an institutionalized regime of systematic oppression and domination by one racial group over any other racial group or groups… with the intention of maintaining that regime.”? (International Convention on the Suppression and Punishment of the Crime of Apartheid; 18 July 1976, Article XV: Art. II 17 18 Laws of Sustainability are articulated by Dr. Albert Bartlett, in Reflections on Sustainability, Population Growth and the Environment, republished in The Essential Exponential! For the Future of our Planet 18 http://why-we-are-white-refugees.blogspot.com/2011/02/french-unhcr-rep-eu-legal-network-on.html 19 http://why-we-are-white-refugees.blogspot.com/2011/02/prof-denis-alland-univ-paris-ii-unhcr.html 20 http://why-we-are-white-refugees.blogspot.com/2011/03/african-white-refugee-petition-to.html 21 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pfdtX5LV9XU

Sanguinis Petition Government.

and

Briefing

Paper

submitted

Netherlands

Please provide the Ministry of Foreign Affairs Written Reasons clarifying the Jus Sanguinis Petitioners Errors of Fact or Law. Please inform us where our facts, legal principles or logic are incorrect. Which Jus Sanguinis allegations and conclusions are not supported by our facts, legal principles or logic? Please show how the course of action we propose is not the most beneficial to avoid and mitigate resource war violence and population pressures friction between different cultures. Please show how the Dutch Government can guarantee their Jus Sanguinis Dutch descendant settler families in South Africa their cultural and racial survival, while silently endorsing the ANC’s breeding war and Affirmative Action policies, and Black Liberation Theology Truth and Reconciliation on the rotting corpse of settlers ‘reconciliation’, steering South Africa towards systemic collapse and white genocide?

Jus Sanguinis Population Policy and Just War Theory Principles TRC Fraud arguments: [1]

Population Policy Common Sense: Eco-Numeracy, Exponential Capacity, Youth Bulges, Population Pressure Conflicts and the Competitive Exclusion Principle.

[2]

Just War Tradition: Mutually Agreed Rules of Combat between Culturally Similar Enemies: Jus Ad Bellum Convention, Principles of Jus In Bello & Just Post Bellum.

Please clarify the Jus Sanguinis Petitions Errors of Fact or Law regarding the aforementioned Jus Sanguinis principles in the Briefing Paper (www.african-white-refugees.co.nr):

Just War Theory TRC Fraud Arguments: [3]

If justice must not only be done, but be seen to be done (R v Sussex Justices, Ex parte McCarthy22); where in the TRC’s enquiry into the nature and causes of Apartheid violence, did they make an impartial enquiry into the evidence whether Boer & African cultures were similar enough for Just War Theory to apply; and if so to hear evidence contradicting the ANC’s ‘liberation struggle’ being a ‘Just War’.

[4]

Jus Sanguinis argue that the ANC (a) did not have a just cause, (b) did not declare war on Apartheid as a last resort, (c) the ANC’s war against apartheid was not declared by proper authority; (d) ANC did not possess right intention, (e) ANC did not have a reasonable chance of success, and (f) ANC did not use proportional force; (f) Post Bellum: ANC are doing all in their power -- including the continuation of their breeding war against whites in South Africa – to facilitate the destruction of Boer-Afrikaner and other minority cultures, some of whom (the Radical Honesty culture) have absolutely no standing whatsoever in SA’s alleged ‘multi-culti’ courtrooms; (g) the ANC repeatedly reneged upon its promises of Amnesty destroying all trust in future political agreements. 1.

[No Right Intention; No Proper Authority; Not a last resort; No reasonable Chances of Success; No Proportional Force] Forsaking commitment to Gandhian Nonviolence, honour & character.. ANC-Fanonstein spawned a Government of comrade-tsotsis, gangsters & kleptomaniacs

R v Sussex Justices, Ex parte McCarthy ([1924] 1 KB 256, [1923] All ER 233)

[5]

[No Right Intention; Not a last resort; No reasonable Chances of Success; No Proportional Force] SA Communist Party (SACP)’s M-Plan: Violent Liberation & Mandela’s Cult of Personality

[No Right Intention] No Proper Authority: Did Black South Africans want Black Rule?

[No Right Intention]: Did ‘Evil Apartheid’ raise poor Black living standards to highest in Africa?

[No Just Cause, No Last Resort, No Proper Authority, No Right Intention, No Proportional Force] Black Consciousness & Fanon’s Handbook for Black Liberation: ‘Violence as a cleansing Liberating Force’

[No Just Cause, No Last Resort, No Proper Authority, No Right Intention, No Proportional Force, No Reasonable chances of success] ANC’s People’s War: Terrorize the People to Support the ‘Liberation Struggle’

[No Just Cause, No Reasonable Chances of Success, No Proportional Force] Stalinist Popular Front: ANC’s Mbokodo Quatro Torture Camps

[No Right Intention; No Just Cause] Zimbabwefication of South Africa: State’s Systemic Collapse

[No Right Intention; No Just Cause] Masculine Insecurity Poverty Pimping: ANC’s Population Production of Poverty & Violence Breeding War

Please clarify the Petitions Errors of Fact or Law regarding aforementioned Jus Sanguinis Briefing Paper Arguments (www.african-white-refugees.co.nr).

Censored by TRC’s Fraud: ANC’s Black Power ‘Operation Production’ Breeding War confirms Apartheid was a Just War for Demographic Survival of Boer Afrikaners: [6]

“We must all understand that the most potent weapons of war are the penis and the womb. Therefore, if you cannot convince a group to control its population by discussion, debate, intelligent analysis etc., you must consider their action in using the penis and the womb to increase population an act of war,” was the ‘Just War defence’ response by Attorney Jason G. Brent, to an individual who disputed that the National Party could rationally conclude that white South Africans were facing extinction as a result of the ‘swart gevaar’ (ANC and Africans breeding war decisions and actions); and as a result needed to implement Apartheid for the survival of whites.

[7]

In his book Humans: An Endangered Species23 Mr. Brent further expands on this issue, in a larger context: “No one has the right to use his penis or her womb to destroy all of humanity. There is not a God given right to reproduce or to reproduce in a manner which results in the total and complete destruction of our species.”

[8]

Where is the legal or other authority that grants black South Africans the right to use their penis and wombs’ to participate in an operation production breeding war so as to exponentially render white South Africans in South Africa’s destruction?

[9]

As per aforementioned Justice Must not only be done, but be seen to be done (R v Sussex Justices, Ex parte McCarthy24) principle; when during the TRC process did the TRC make any enquiry into the Population Policy Nature and Causes for establishing

23 24

http://why-we-are-white-refugees.blogspot.com/2011/03/humans-endangered-species-i-power-of.html R v Sussex Justices, Ex parte McCarthy ([1924] 1 KB 256, [1923] All ER 233)

Apartheid, and how much of Apartheid violence was a result of Population growth, Cultural Friction Theory Population Pressures and Demographic Youth Bulge violence, etc population factors? [10]

[11]

The following chapters in the Briefing Paper provide greater evidence to these issues: 1.

[Population Policy Self Defence Motive for Apartheid] Nature and Causes of Apartheid: A Just War for Boer-Afrikaner Demographic Survival

[Friction Theory] Pandora’s Multi-Culti Apartheid Box: SA’s Multi-Cultural MultiLingual, Multi-Racial Integration Nightmare

Population Policy Common Sense Interpretation of Promotion of National Unity and Reconciliation (TRC) Act, Amicus Curiae to Constitutional Court: CENSORED

Apartheids Strategic Demographic & Political Mistakes

Please clarify the Petitions Errors of Fact or Law regarding aforementioned Jus Sanguinis Briefing Paper Arguments (www.african-white-refugees.co.nr).

International Law Multi-Cultural Friction Theory TRC Fraud Arguments: [12]

International Law requires that a Mono-cultural legal society – i.e. where the entire society abides by the same legal system’s principles and doctrines – requires the rule of law provisions of legislation to be adequately accessible and sufficiently precise to enable people to regulate their affairs in accord with the law (Lithgow & others v. United Kingdom25, European Court of Human Rights). Consequently a society professing to be a legal Multi-cultural society, such as South Africa’s legislative provisions should be as or more adequately accessible and sufficiently precise for the individual and groups to regulate their affairs in accordance to such laws.

[13]

The Constitution provides an entitlement for invoking26 cultural law27 in S. 15 (3), 30, 31, and 185, which require the application of choice of law rules, confirming SA as a legal multi-cultural society. However SA courts have denied the Radical Honesty culture all Audi Alteram Partem rights to present their cultural doctrines and principles evidence, to assert their right to invoke cultural law, or to invoke her internationally recognized political necessity defence. 1.

Was Truth and Reconciliation Seen to be Done, by the Ubuntu Black Liberation Theology Truth Commission? The evidence shows that it was not only not done, but also not seen to be done.

Western Descartian Individualist “I Think, therefore I am” vs. African Ubuntu Conformist “I participate, therefore I am,” clarifies the dual opposing cultural and existential worldviews of Africans and Europeans in South Africa.

TRC Social Contract provides NO Definitions for Multi-Cultural Multi-Interpretation of Key Concepts of ‘Forgiveness’, ‘Reconciliation’, ‘Closure’ and ‘Ubuntu’, clarifies that nowhere in any TRC social contract legislation are any of these terms

Lithgow & others v. United Kingdom (1986) * EHRR 329 § 110 Ex parte Minister of Native Affairs: In re Yako v Beyi 1948 (1) SA 388 (A) at 397: Appellate Division held that neither common nor customary law was prima facie applicable. Courts had to consider all the circumstances of a case, and, without any preconceived view about the applicability of one or other legal system, select the appropriate law on the basis of its inquiry. 27 SALC, Sept 1999: Report on Conflicts of law: P.22: ‘1.58. The Constitution now provides an entitlement for invoking customary law in legal suits. Because ss 30 and 31 specifically guarantee an individual and a group's right to pursue a culture of choice, it could be argued that application of customary law has become a constitutional right. Previously, the state had assumed complete discretion in deciding whether and to what extent customary law should be recognized, an attitude typical of colonial thinking, for Africans were subject to whatever policies the conquering state chose to impose on them. Now, however, the state has a duty to allow people to participate in the culture they choose, implicit in this duty is a responsibility to uphold the institutions on which that culture is based.’ 26

defined, even though Calvinist Christianity’s concepts of forgiveness and reconciliation are totally different to Black Liberation Theology’s concepts of forgiveness and reconciliation.

[14]

Black Liberation Theology: Salvation/Liberation by Marxist/Fanon Class Struggle, not Reconciliation/Forgiveness of Sins, explains black liberation theology’s perspective to forgiveness and reconciliation as economic in accordance to Marx and the Jesuits liberation theology theories.

Land Grabs & Farm Murders: A Rainbow-TRC-Peace, or Racial-Hatred-War Reality?.

Population Policy Common Sense Interpretation of Promotion of National Unity and Reconciliation (TRC) Act, Amicus Curiae to Constitutional Court: CENSORED. Sincere forgiveness and sincere race relations based on honesty not welcome in South Africa; and according to the Constitutional Court ‘not in the interests of justice’.

Please clarify the Petitions Errors of Fact or Law regarding aforementioned Jus Sanguinis Briefing Paper Arguments (www.african-white-refugees.co.nr).

Peak Oil Population Policy Friction Theory Common Sense: Peak Oil GeoPoLegal Military Necessity of Ethno-Cultural Secession and Economic Relocalisation. [15]

[16]

The petitioner argues in favour of the geopolitical, national, ethnic and cultural importance of amicably resolving the multi-cultural conflicts to occur as a result of population pressures colliding with declining resources, prior to their friction theory on steroids aggravation by the socio-political and economic friction theory resource war consequences of Peak Oil. 1.

Wake Up Whitey!: African White Refugee Canaries in the International EthnoCultural Geopolitical Coalmine.

Europe commits Ethno-Cultural Suicide: Dr. Frank Ellis reviews Dr. Thilo Sarrazin’s Germany Consigns Itself to Oblivion.

Jus Sanguinis Right of Return: Cultural & Ethno Homogeneity.

Multiculturalism Impossible with Dysfunctional Cultures.

Peak Oil, Economic Collapse & Friction Theory Cultural Conflict.

ABC’s of Ecology: Food Production & Population Growth; Peak Oil and Population DieOff.

Parallel Goals: Economic Relocalisation & Political Secession.

Secession in SA: Volksraad Verkiesing Kommissie (VVK): Electoral Commission for the Election of a Boer-Afrikaner People’s Assembly.

Please clarify the Petitions Errors of Fact or Law regarding aforementioned Jus Sanguinis Briefing Paper Arguments (www.african-white-refugees.co.nr).

Updated Peak Oil and/or Humanitarian Hypocrisy Circumstances: Is the Netherlands Government’s support for Military Intervention in Libya founded on Peak Oil motives; or Humanitarian motives? Allegations the US Regime Change of Libya Motivated by Peak Oil Factor:

[17]

Nigel Farage, the leader of the UK Independence Party, states, among others, the following in an interview on Russia Today28: 1.

The EU started this war, and their motive for the military mission to Iraq is regime change; one of the motives therefore being Libya’s oil.

The English establishment are a political class who spend their career in politics, who operate, vote and think like sheep, who lack independent critical thinking faculties.

The Eurozone cannot work between such diverse countries as Greece and Germany; who are trapped in the EU prison.

[18]

Celente: Would US target Libya if they had broccoli instead of oil?29: PrisonPlanet: Oil & hypocrisy “just beyond belief”: Trends forecaster Gerald Celente says it is not support for the Libyan people, but interest in the country's vast oil fields that is driving US rhetoric. “The only reason they are interested in Libya is for their oil. Do you hear anybody screaming and yelling here about all those people that were killed last week on the Ivory Coast or in Sudan?” Celente questions. Gerald Celente says the hypocrisy is “just beyond belief” and the western world is calling for the head of Gaddafi but not for the head of any other leader from rioting countries like Egypt, Bahrain, Tunisia or Yemen. “Why? Because it is oil. You think we’d be in Iraq if the major export there was broccoli?” exclaimed Celente.

[19]

US about to order Libya invasion - Castro30; News.AU: CUBA and Nicaragua have sprung to the defence of embattled Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi, with Fidel Castro claiming Washington plans to order a NATO invasion of Libya to seize oil interests…. Washington, he said, "will not hesitate to give the order for NATO to invade that rich country, perhaps in the coming hours or days."

[20]

Libya Operation: Foreign Oil Interests Prompt Invasion31; Russia Today (03 March): Mideast expert Mahdi Darius Nazemroaya says that US wants to appropriate Libyan oil, and that operations have already begun.

[21]

Petroleum and Empire in North Africa: NATO Invasion of Libya Underway32; GlobalResearch: “Are events unfolding in Libya, Tunisia and Egypt more about petroterrorism or about freedom and democracy? How much oil is there in North Africa? Who is in control of that oil? What is the relationship between the West and Muamar Gaddafi? Is he really the terrorist we've all been led to believe he is? Who is the Libyan "opposition" and who are the "rebels" we read about? Presented with this story are petroleum industry concessions maps ** for North Africa that people might want to ponder in between the Western propaganda on Libya. [..] The US/European/Israeli nexus seeks to dislodge state-ownership -- to whatever extent it actually exists -- and dislodge any Chinese workers or companies involved in the oil exploitation, and replace these with western companies and western agents.

[22]

Dutch Soldiers to Join Military Mission in Libya, Xinhua33: “The Dutch government has decided to send 200 troops to join the military actions against Libya, local media reported on Tuesday. The country will also dispatch six F-16 jet fighters and one minehunter ship, according to reports of the Dutch state news agency. Defense Minister

28 29 30 31 32 33

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AqKdDNM7jpQ http://www.prisonplanet.com/celente-would-us-target-libya-if-they-had-broccoli-instead-of-oil.html http://www.news.com.au/breaking-news/us-about-to-order-libya-invasion-castro/story-e6frfku0-1226010585130 http://tv.globalresearch.ca/2011/03/libya-operation-foreign-oil-interests-prompt-invasion http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=23481 http://english.cri.cn/6966/2011/03/23/2021s627996.htm

Hans Hillen told reporters the Dutch contribution was for three months, after which NATO and the Netherlands would decide whether and how to continue the mission. [23]

MPs back expanding Dutch role in Libya no-fly zone, DutchNews.NL34: A majority of MPs is in favour of expanding the Dutch role in Libya to include monitoring the no-fly zone, according to media reports on Friday afternoon. The cabinet is to send a briefing to parliament later in the day outlining exactly what the Netherlands is prepared to add to the Nato mission. The Netherlands has already sent six F-16 fighter jets and has committed 200 military personal to help monitor the arms embargo. The Netherlands hopes to become part of the Nato team monitoring the no-fly zone over Libya as soon as possible, prime minister Mark Rutte told reporters on Thursday evening.

[24]

The Dutch contribute to war-mongering, EnergyPub35: As NATO forces are now flying cover over Libya, and the Netherlands is contributing with F-16 fighters and a minesweeper, Dutch media have noted that the Netherlands is a major player in the international weapons trade, especially considering how small a country it is. Dutch daily NRC reports that according to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, only Israel and Sweden earn more from the export of weaponry [per head of the population].

[25]

Dutch contribute six F-16s and a KDC-10 to Odyssey Dawn, F-16 Net36: The Dutch government deployed six F-16s, a KDC-10 tanker and a navy minesweeper to help enforce the arms embargo against Libya.

[26]

The Netherlands sends fighter jets, 200 soldiers to Nato Libya mission, DutchNews.NL37: The Netherland is to send six F16 fighter jets and 200 soldiers to take part in the Nato mission in Libya, the cabinet decided at an emergency meeting on Monday night. The cost of the Dutch contribution is around €20m, which will come from a special government fund for international activities.

[27]

Dutch Opposition Appear to Support NATO Arms Embargo Mission, Radio Netherlands Worldwide38: The Dutch opposition appears to support the proposed Dutch participation in a NATO operation to control the UN arms embargo against Libya. So far only the Socialist Party has raised objections. Last night, Prime Minister Mark Rutte announced the Netherlands would send six F-16 fighter planes, minesweeper HNLMS Haarlem and a KDC-10 fuelling plane to the Mediterranean to monitor the embargo. The Dutch parliament is currently being briefed on the mission by Chief Commander Peter van Uhm. Labour Party MP Frans Timmermans says his party has a large number of questions but the party thinks the Netherlands should help "prevent the massacre of the Libyan people" by Muammar Gaddafi. Green Left MP Arjan El Fassed says the party supports the mission "As long as the mission helps protect Libyans." Nevertheless, the MP thinks more clarity in needed about the nature and scope of the operation before the party gives its approval. On Twitter Freedom Party leader Geert Wilders said supporting the cabinet plans for military participation in Libya is "very difficult". He feels the Arab countries are not doing enough. On Tuesday, he called for a "limited supportive role" for the Dutch. On Tuesday, Socialist Party leader Emile Roemer voiced his fears that the Netherlands would be drawn into "a civil war in which the international community is acting as an air force for the rebels". Although the government does not officially require parliamentary support for a foreign mission, it is customary such missions to be sent with the support of a large majority. The coalition parties, the conservative VVD

34 35 36 37 38

http://www.dutchnews.nl/news/archives/2011/03/mps_back_expanding_dutch_role.php http://www.energypublisher.com/article.asp?id=50939 http://www.f-16.net/news_article4320.html http://www.dutchnews.nl/news/archives/2011/03/the_netherlands_sends_fighter.php http://www.rnw.nl/africa/bulletin/dutch-opposition-appear-support-nato-arms-embargo-mission

and Christian Democrats appear to have the backing of D66 and the Green Left. If the Christian Unions puts aside its concerns, there is a narrow majority. Meanwhile, the Labour Party says it is positive about the proposed mission, which means there is broad parliamentary support. [28]

Should the Netherlands get involved in Libya?; Dutch News.NL39:

Are Netherlands Libyan Regime Change Motivations: Peak Oil; or Humanitarian? Are Netherlands Libyan Regime Change Motivations: Peak Oil related? [29]

If the Netherlands Governments motivations are founded upon Peak Oil arguments; then that CONFIRMS THEIR ENDORSEMENT OF JUS SANGUINIS PETITION PEAK OIL POPULATION POLICY FRICTION THEORY ARGUMENTS AS ACCURATE.

[30]

If so, the Netherlands Foreign Ministry repudiate the Peak Oil justifications provided in the Jus Sanguinis Petition as erroneous and unjustified in their written response to the Petitioners.

[31]

But then proceed to confirm the Peak Oil Justifications in the Jus Sanguinis petition as accurate and justified, in their actions towards Libya, by considering it necessary to support the overthrow of Gaddafi, in order for the EU to gain access to Libya’s oil reserves; as a result of the reality of Peak Oil.

Or; are Netherlands Libyan Regime Change Motivations: Humanitarian?

http://www.dutchnews.nl/poll/index.php?poll_id=181

[32]

Netherlands Humanitarian Concerns for Libya’s death Toll: Endorse Military Invasion and Regime Change 1.

Libya unrest death toll ‘tops 200’40, AlJazeera: “Residents told Al Jazeera that at least 200 people had died in the eastern city of Benghazi alone, while the New York-based Human Rights Watch on Sunday put the countrywide death toll at 104. The rights group said the figure was "conservative".”

Libya unrest: Scores killed in ‘massacre’41, BBC: “Details have emerged of huge casualty figures in the Libyan city of Benghazi, where troops have launched a brutal crackdown on protesters. More than 200 people are known to have died.

Are the Netherlands Humanitarian Concerns for their SA Descendants to endorse the ANC’s Black Liberation Theology Reconciliation on their Dutch settler rotting corpses? [33]

Consequences of International Conspiracy of Silence Endorsing ANC’s Black Liberation Theology Reconciliation on the rotting corpses of SA’s Dutch descendant farmer settlers. 1.

Unrepresented Nations and Peoples Organization (UNPO): AFRIKANER42: Afrikaners in general, and the Afrikaner farmers in particular, are at times the target of ethnic violence. The South African murder rate is extremely high at 48 murders per 100,000 of the population, compared to 2 murders per 100,000 in Europe, for example. If Afrikaner farmers are taken as a statistical population, the murder rate is 287 per 100,000.

Jus Sanguinis Briefing Paper: Land Grabs and Farm Murders: A Rainbow-TRCPeace, or Racial-Hatred-War Reality?:

Wikileaks: More Civilians Killed In South Africa Than in Iraq War Over Last 6 Years43, Sarah Maid of Albion, 25 October 2010

Farm Murders rise 3,095% in ANC’s ‘TRC Rainbow Democracy’

Jus Sanguinis Briefing Paper: Zimbabwefication of South Africa: State’s Systemic Collapse: A.

[34]

Deaths in Police custody increase 25,725% in ANC’s ‘TRC Rainbow Democracy’

Vlaams Belang Humanitarian Statements to the South African Government voicing their Humanitarian concern objections to ANC’s Black Liberation Theology Reconciliation on the rotting corpses of SA’s European settlers. 1.

SA Farm Attacks44: EU MP Philip Claeys, from Vlaams Belang (VB) confronts Pres. Zuma at EU Parliament, about SA's more than 3000 murdered white farmers, since 1994; & what concrete measures the ANC are taking about crime/ Philip Claeys (VB) confronteert president Zuma met moorden op blanken45.

http://english.aljazeera.net/news/africa/2011/02/20112206386812127.html http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-12517327 42 http://www.unpo.org/members/8148 43 http://sarahmaidofalbion.blogspot.com/2010/10/wikileaks-more-civilians-killed-in.html 44 http://sa-farm-attacks.co.nr/ 45 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xb7zETQ6YZw http://www.philipclaeys.org/archief.php?id=452/ 41

[35]

46 47 48

Vlaamsbelang: Parliamentarian John Vrancken: ‘South Africa is neither free, nor peaceful, nor democratic: he also slammed the ‘genocide going on inside South Africa of the white farm-families’, noting during the parliamentary debate that more than 2,500 Boer-farmers had already been murdered since 1994 in a ’clearly-targeted terrorism campaign against this white SA minority’. ‘Vrancken noted while framing his questions that ‘when the previous regime ended in South Africa (in 1994) that country 's new government was being held up to us as a model-democratic state,'a shining example of freedom, peace and democracy for all of Africa, and this idealised view is still being presented to us today.'However this highly idealistic viewpoint which is constantly being forced upon us, clearly does not match the actual reality on the ground.' * "In fact, South Africa very rapidly became the most criminal society on earth under the Mbeki-regime,' he noted. He noted that South Africa, as a member of the UN security council, was constantly voting against any motions which want to condemn the human rights violations in Sudan, Angola, Namibia and especially in Zimbabwe, a country which he said was facing out-and-out genocide.’ “We also cannot condone the true genocide which is currently taking place inside South Africa targeting the white farmers in the so-called farm murders. Clearly an overwhelmingly white minority is being targeted here and systematically being terrorised. Yet the black SA government which has now been in power since 1994 has taken no structural steps to stop these attacks against white farm families.46

EU Newspapers Humanitarian Written and Public Statements to the South African Government voicing their Humanitarian concern objections to ANC’s Black Liberation Theology Reconciliation on the rotting corpses of SA’s white European settlers: 1.

White farmers 'being wiped out': Over 3,000 have been killed since 1994. Now the ANC is accused of fanning the hate47. Sunday Times.UK: March 28, 2010: Death has stalked South Africa’s white farmers for years. The number murdered since the end of apartheid in 1994 has passed 3,000. In neighbouring Zimbabwe, a campaign of intimidation that began in 2000 has driven more than 4,000 commercial farmers off their land, but has left fewer than two dozen dead. The vulnerability felt by South Africa’s 40,000 remaining white farmers intensified earlier this month when Julius Malema, head of the African National Congress’s (ANC’s) youth league, opened a public rally by singing Dubula Ibhunu, or Shoot the Boer, an apartheid-era anthem, that was banned by the high court last week.

Afrikaner farmers abandoned: In South Africa young black men torture and murder approximately one hundred white farmers per year48; Trouw.NL: February 01, 2010: Van Zyl (63) and his wife Retha (66), a much loved local teacher who had just retired, were ‘slaughtered like animals’ on their farm Poortjie in the Free State. Both were first attacked and cruelly mutilated with a meathook, and then shot dead with their own shotgun, said police. Netcare 911 spokesman Chris Botha described the scene at the time as “absolute carnage’ after paramedics arrived. It was the second farm attack in the Odendaalsrust district that week.

South Africa: Hunting season on white farmers still not finished, Het Vrije Volk Editorial: 07 February 2010: In South Africa an average of two farmers a week are killed. On the wall of one farm attack was written in the blood of the victims, "Kill the Boer, Kill the Farmer"(Shaya-maBulu in Xhosa), referring to a battle from the time of apartheid. In response to the article in Trouw you read that many

http://www.topix.com/forum/world/south-africa/T3S5H5A7Q7FNMTKCC http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/africa/article7078730.ece#cid=OTC-RSS&attr=797093 http://www.trouw.nl/nieuws/wereld/article2976849.ece/Afrikaner_boeren_in_de_steek_gelaten_.html

doubt the official statement by police that the motive could be robbery. Sometimes nothing is even stolen, or the perpetratiors have waited until the victims came home. [36]

Netherlands Foreign Affairs Ministry Statements voicing their Humanitarian concern objections to ANC’s Black Liberation Theology Reconciliation on the rotting corpses of SA’s Dutch descendant farmer settlers. 1.

[37]

ZERO????

International Refugee Agencies or United Nations Statements voicing their Humanitarian concern objections to ANC’s Black Liberation Theology Reconciliation on the rotting corpses of SA’s Dutch descendant farmer settlers. 1.

ZERO????

Respectfully Submitted,

Lara Johnstone Jus Sanguinis Petition Organizer www.jussanguinis.com www.african-white-refugees.co.nr

Dutch Embassy Email Response from Wouter Jurgens, Head of Political Section, Royal Netherlands Embassy Pretoria. Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2011 3:40 PM Dear Ms Johnstone, Thank you very much for your email with regard to the petition. Please note that we had already forwarded the petition to the Foreign Ministry in The Hague in December and had provided you with the following answer: "Dear Ms Johnstone, I hereby confirm the reception of your petition in which you plead for "Netherlands citizenship for white African refugees". On behalf of Ambassador De Vos, I would like to convey to you that the embassy has looked carefully at your petition. Based on the issues you raise in your petition I would like to make the following observations: - with regard to the claim of refugees status, the following applies: as you are now in your own country, you cannot be considered a refugee under the Geneva Refugee Convention or under the Dutch Asylum Act. If you are outside your own country you can ask the authorities of the country in which you are now, or UNHCR/UNDP, for protection. - with regard to the application for citizenship of the Netherlands I would like to inform you that under the Dutch Nationality Law it is possible in certain cases to regain Dutch citizenship. This might be an option that is relevant in your case. Please check the website of the Netherlands Embassy for more detailed information on the Nationality Law ( http://southafrica.nlembassy.org/Products_and_Services/Consular_services/Dutch_Nationality). I hope that the abovementioned provides adequate information to respond to your petition. Yours sincerely, Wouter Jurgens Head of Political Section Royal Netherlands Embassy Pretoria P: +27 (0)12 425 4522 F: +27 (0)12 425 4521 E: wouter.jurgens@minbuza.nl" I hope that answer has been satisfactory for you. As neither the circumstances nor the legal arguments with regard to the petition have changed the embassy sees no reason to again forward the petition to the Netherlands government in The Hague. We therefore consider the matter closed. Of course we remain available to answer any further questions that you might have. Yours sincerely, Wouter Jurgens Head of Political Affairs Netherlands Embassy Pretoria P: +27 12 4254522 F: +27 12 4254521 M: +27 83 2925808 E: wouter.jurgens@minbuza.nl

Boer Volkstaat; or Jus Sanguinis Rightof-Return for African White Refugees Petition to Kingdom of Netherlands / Koninkrijk der Nederlanden 08 March 2010 Prime Minister Mark Rutte Council of Ministers of the Netherlands c/o: Hon. Amb. Z.E. dhr. Rob de Vos Koninkrijk der Nederlanden Ambassade Netherlands Embassy, SA Via: PO Box 346, Kaapstad 8000 Tel: +27-21-4215660 | Fax: +27-21-4182690

Ref: Peak Oil: Resource Scarcity & National Security49; Peak Oil Domino50 Revolutions51; Crash of World Economy Ponzi scheme52.

Dear Prime Minister Rutte & Council of Ministers,

Hardcopy of Boer Volkstaat 10/31/16 Theses Petition & Briefing Paper: Boer Volkstaat; or Jus Sanguinis EU Citizenship for African White Refugees. Please find attached the updated hardcopy of the Petition and Briefing Paper submitted to Officials from Koninkrijk der Nederlanden, on 05 December 2010, for your investigation and consideration. The Briefing Paper includes every Petitioner’s original signature individually (Pg JS.17-19) and collectively at their NL Stamvader/Progenitor’s History (Pg: JS.20-21). Please Note: SA Political, Religious, Media and Academic TRC elite have been honourably notified of the contents of this Jus Sanguinis petition, and its allegations of TRC Fraud, as detailed at: Audi Alteram Partem Notice to Republic of South Africa53. The Boer Volkstaat; or Jus Sanguinis Right-of-Return to Europe for African White Refugees Petition and Briefing Paper was submitted by email to the Stamvader/Progenitor nations of Netherlands54, France55, Germany56, United Kingdom57, and Switzerland58; and finally to the NATO Military Committee Chiefs of Defence59, between 05 to 16 December 2010.

49 Military Study Warns of Potentially Drastic Oil Crisis, Der Spiegel http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/0,1518,715138,00.html http://oilprice.com/Energy/Crude-Oil/Leaked-German-Military-Study-Warns-of-Peak-Oil-Crisis.html; Oilquake in the Middle East, by Michael Klare http://www.energybulletin.net/stories/2011-03-03/oilquake-middle-east 50 http://why-we-are-white-refugees.blogspot.com/2011/03/humans-endangered-species-i-power-of.html 51 http://why-we-are-white-refugees.blogspot.com/2011/02/tunisia-egypt-libyatick-tock-peak-oil.html 52 http://why-we-are-white-refugees.blogspot.com/2011/03/exponential-economic-population-growth.html 53 http://www.jussanguinis.com/JS-RoR/za_southafrica.htm 54 http://www.jussanguinis.com/JS-RoR/eu_netherlands.htm 55 http://www.jussanguinis.com/JS-RoR/eu_france.htm 56 http://www.jussanguinis.com/JS-RoR/eu_germany.htm 57 http://www.jussanguinis.com/JS-RoR/eu_uk.htm 58 http://www.jussanguinis.com/JS-RoR/eu_switzerland.htm 59 http://www.jussanguinis.com/JS-RoR/eu_nato.htm

One hundred and sixty EU politicians, academics, legal experts and military officials were petitioned; the majority of whom acknowledged receipt of the petitions for their attention. The Boer Volkstaat for African White Refugees Petition appeals for: [A] Political and Legal Recognition for Volksraad Verkiesing Kommissie (VVK) elections & negotiations for a Boer-Volkstaat in S. Africa; or in the absence thereof; [B] The legislative enactment of Jus Sanguinis Right-of-Return legislation by the relevant Progenitor/Stamvader EU Nations, for EU citizenship for African White Refugee descendants. The Volkstaat Secession / Jus Sanguinis Right-of-Return Petition Evidentiary Arguments and Justifications; are contained in the attached Boer Volkstaat 10/31/16 Theses Briefing Paper, which is also available for PDF download from www.african-white-refugees.co.nr. Briefly the Justification arguments are: 

International Law: Jus Sanguinis, Just War Theory; S. 235 of the SA Constitution, 23 April 1994 Accord on Afrikaner Self-Determination signed by the Freedom Front, the African National Congress and the South African Government/National Party;



ANC’s TRC Fraud: African National Congress (ANC) / Anti-Apartheid Movement (AAM) / Truth and Reconciliation (TRC) Fraud: (a) Just War Theory Arguments; (b) Clash of Cultures Friction Theory Arguments; (c) Population Policy Common Sense Arguments.



Population Policy Friction Theory Common Sense: Peak Oil GeoPoLegal Military Necessity of Ethno-Cultural Secession & Economic Relocalisation: The geopolitical, national, ethnic and cultural importance of amicably resolving population pressures colliding with declining resources multi-cultural conflicts, prior to their friction theory on steroids aggravation by the socio-political and economic resource war consequences of Peak Oil.

On 05 January 2011, the General Secretariat Parliamentary Services Office of Hansheiri Inderkum, Swiss President of the Council of States; requested that the Petition be submitted in hardcopy form and bear each Petitioners original signature; that such original hardcopy be submitted to the Swiss Embassy in Pretoria. Consequently hardcopy Petitions and Briefing Papers are also being submitted to the other Petitioned Progenitor Nations, NATO, and other EU and UN nations. Respectfully Submitted,

Lara Johnstone (Co-Founding Petitioner to France, United Kingdom and Netherlands)

Hendrik du Plessis (Co-Founding Petitioner to France and Germany)

Jus Sanguinis Petitioners to Koninkrijk der Nederlanden (See Pg JS.17-19 & 20-21):

JOHNSTONE: Lara

VOCKINS: Denise

JONES: Annelien

MEYER: Deon Gerhard

MEYER: Gerhard

MEYER: Jeandre

MEYER: Jean Simonet

OLIVIER: Derrick

OLIVIER: Jacomina Aletha (Laetitia) Dr (born RAS)

OLIVIER: Johannes Diederik (Jay-D) Dr

VAN DUIJN: Mignon (born OLIVIER)

VAN TIL: Michael Marsden

VAN ZYL: Erasmus Johannes Hendrik