03 October 2012 P O Box 5042 George East, 6539 South Africa Mr. Gordon Duff PRESS TV 6, East 2nd St. Farhang Blvd. Saadat Abad 19977-66411, Tehran, IRAN Tel: +98 (21) 230 111 30 | Fax: +98 (21) 230 111 39 PressTV (info@presstv.ir), Newsroom (newsroom@presstv.ir), Veterans Today (info@veteranstoday.com), Veterans Today Editor (editor@VeteransToday.com) Veterans Today & PressTV.IR confirm EcoFeminist Amicus Curiae to US Court of Appeals for Armed Forces Correct: Bradley Manning Cannot get Fair Trial when Media Abuse their Publicity Power, by refusing to practice scientific journalism! I saw your Veterans Today article1 posted to PressTV.IR: Exclusive: Assange-Mossad ties unveiled2, which alleges that Julian Assange has ties to the Mossad. FYI / Disclosure: I am a member of the Radical Honesty culture, which is based on 100% transparency, and does not practice any Bullshit-the-Public Relations Image management. I am also a friend of Wikileaks (FoWL) in as much as Wikileaks supports transparency about EVERYTHING. I speak only for myself. I notice for someone who professes to support 'truth'; you practice very little, if any, transparency. I am curious what your definition of 'truth' is? How do you propose your readers know whether you are telling the truth, when you never provide your readers with any access to any documents you refer to, and you appear addicted to anonymous sources. I am rather confused what you mean when you state ―No move has ever been made against Wikileaks by the United States‖. The Wikileaks backgrounder3 for Mr. Assange's talk to the UN refers to, among others: US Grand Jury Investigation of WikiLeaks: The US Government has coordinated a joint interagency criminal investigation of Wikileaks comprised of a partnership between the Department of Defense (DOD) including: CENTCOM; SOUTHCOM; the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA); Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA); Headquarters Department of the Army (HQDA); US Army Criminal Investigation Division (CID) for USFI (US Forces Iraq) and 1st Armored Division (AD); US Army Computer Crimes Investigative Unit (CCIU); 2nd Army (US Army Cyber 1 2 3
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/09/30/press-tv-exclusive-assange-mossad-ties-unveiled/ http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2012/09/28/263893/exclusive-assangemossad-ties-unveiled/ http://wikileaks.org/Background-for-UN-Talk-Ongoing.html
04/10/12 Veterans Today confirms Ecocentric Amicus Argument to USCAAF re Bradley Manning & Media
Command); Within that or in addition, three military intelligence investigations were conducted. Department of Justice (DOJ) Grand Jury and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Department of State (DOS) and Diplomatic Security Service (DSS). In addition, Wikileaks has been investigated by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI), Office of the National CounterIntelligence Executive (ONCIX), the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA); the House Oversight Committee; the National Security Staff Interagency Committee, and the PIAB (President‘s Intelligence Advisory Board).
Furthermore: Are you suggesting that no US Goverment Official had anything to do with the financial blockade against Wikileaks? Paypal et al, simply decided of their own volition – smoking too much pot, perhaps, they thought they would appoint themselves as the Financial police of the planet??? - that they were going to instigate a financial blockade, against the only news publication on the planet practicing SCIENTIFIC JOURNALISM AND TRANSPARENCY? So, who is the ―pig‖ and who is the ―chicken‖; or is that all just Humpty Dumpty bullshit, cause when you want to, you Humpty Dumpty your definition of ―pig‖, to pretend it is ―chicken‖? ―When I use a word,‖ Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, ―it means just what I choose it to mean—neither more nor less.‖ ―The question is,‖ said Alice, ―whether you can make words mean so many different things.‖ ―The question is,‖ said Humpty Dumpty, ―which is to be master - that's all.‖ - Carrol, L (1872): Through the Looking-Glass
Could you please provide your sources for your allegations that Assange coordinates his releases with the worlds druglords, his ―bankster‖ friends and, closest of all, Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu, his strongest supporter, to interfere in the American election on behalf of Mitt Romney? Are you saying you actually think and believe there is a fundamental difference between Mitt Romney and Barak Obama? Far as I see it... they are both ―pig‖ who happily Bullshit the Public Relations that they are ―chicken‖! Believing one word that comes out of either of their snouts is to admit you ain't no different than Jim Jones Coolaid gang: desperate to be mindfucked and abused as Republican/Democrat cannon fodder. Or if we asked Malcolm X he‘d say the same… there ain‘t no difference between the ‗growling wolf‘s policies and the smiling foxes policies, except the growling wolf is more honest about whom he is. Malcolm X (1963/12/04): ―The white liberal differs from the white conservative only in one way: the liberal is more deceitful…. more hypocritical than the conservative. Both want power, but the white liberal is the one who has perfected the art of posing as the Negro‘s friend and benefactor; and by winning the friendship, allegiance, and support of the Negro, the white liberal is able to use the Negro as a pawn or tool in this political ―football game‖ that is constantly raging between the white liberals and conservatives. …. The white conservatives aren‘t friends of the Negro either, but they at least don‘t try to hide it. They are like wolves; they show their teeth in a snarl that keeps the Negro always aware of where he stands with them. But the white liberals are foxes, who also show their teeth to the Negro but pretend that they are smiling. The white liberals are more dangerous than the conservatives; they lure the Negro, and as the Negro runs from the growling wolf, he flees into the open jaws of the ―smiling‖ fox.‖
I stand corrected, but, as far as I am aware, one of, if not the largest druglord on the planet4, is the Central Intelligence Agency, acting on behalf of Democrat and Republican Presidents to manipulate the Wall Street Popsicle Index; even the CIA's Inspector General Report admitted5 as much [From the Wilderness: CIA & Drugs6]. Invasion of Afghanistan had as primary Peak Oil 4 5 6
http://fromthewilderness.com/free/ciadrugs/index.html http://fromthewilderness.com/free/ciadrugs/volii.html http://fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/index.shtml#drugs
04/10/12 Veterans Today confirms Ecocentric Amicus Argument to USCAAF re Bradley Manning & Media
motive - controlling worlds remaining oil supplies – and secondarily the control of Afghanistan's drug profits7. Are you suggesting that Julian Assange and the CIA are working together? Or which drug lords are you referring to? Julian Assange and bankster friends? Who the fuck are Assange's bankster friends? Paypal? Visa? Mastercard? Nice buddies, huh? Are you confused between Netanyahu and Correa? They don't look alike. Are you aware that Assange is in the Ecuador Embassy, not the Israeli Embassy? I am unaware of any 'friendship' between Mr. Assange and Netanyahu; could you kindly enlighten the world, with evidence? Some of us ain't addicted to Jew hating; we think Jews, Muslims, etc should be judged upon evidence. While you are at it, could you kindly provide your evidence that Assange supported the war against Iraq, a US attack on Iran, war with Pakistan, supports US interference in Syria? Are you aware of any documentation in Wikileaks possession regarding the World Trade Center Attacks, which they have not published? As far as I was aware, Wikileaks published the 9/11 Pager data8. You accuse Mr. Assange of being an 'Islamophobe'. What is your definition for Islamophobe? Why would an Islamophobe give an uncensored interview to the leader of Hisbollah, and many other Muslim activists? The last uncensored interview I can recall by a journalist of a controversial individual was that of an Israeli Journalist interviewing Ernest Zundel9. How many politically correct mindfucked lilly white guilt journalists have the honour and integrity of that Israeli journalist? Or is your use of 'Islamophobe' purely a Propaganda Warfare bullshit scheme: you acting as an agent on behalf of Islamicists to instill fear of Islam ―Islamophobia‖ into the hearts of nonMuslims, using any means necessary to force them to submit to Islam‘s might10; a subtle threat to Mr. Assange; that if he does not bow down to being buttfucked by ―Islamophobia‖ threats, then what, Mr. Duff? What are you not Islamophobic about Mr. Duff? How Muslim men treat women? You got fuck all problem with Muslim women being used as doormats and brood sow cannon fodder? Any man who stands up for women's rights and objects to Muslims treatment is an Islamophobe? Are you attempting to threaten Wikileaks/CCR from consenting to the EcoCentric Amicus Curiae submission to the USCAAF? You got yourself a White Guilt complex or a Masculine Insecurity complex, Mr. Huff? Muslims and muslim societies, or Islam religion can not be held to the same standards as Europeans, European society or Christianity; and god knows they have been lowering their standards into the gutter for so long, they hardly have any fucking standards left; so desperate are white guilt politically correct mindfucked Europeans to give up all capacity for critical thinking and rational thought? Anyone who has any criticism for Muslims is an Islamophobe, cause you got yourself a white guilt complex, and think Muslims are somehow inferior and should not be held to the same standards as anyone else? Is that why Veterans Today - like so many White Guilt Feminists couldn't give a flying fuck about how many Muslim men treat Muslim women? ―Alas, many of my western "postmodern" feminist daughters and granddaughters have betrayed their feminist ideals. They have become Stalinized and "Palestinianized," and are now invested in what they call "multi-cultural relativism," "anti-racism," and "post-colonialism." Thus, they are far 7
http://fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/030103_opium.html http://911.wikileaks.org/ 9 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hVkp96Gm5tU 10 http://www.rightsidenews.com/2012100217142/life-and-science/culture-wars/islamophobia-is-a-sacralizedislamic-objective.html 8
04/10/12 Veterans Today confirms Ecocentric Amicus Argument to USCAAF re Bradley Manning & Media
more concerned with the rights of barbarian cultures to treat women and children in barbarically misogynist ways lest they, the politically correct feminists, be demonized as "racists" or "Islamophobes." Their false concern about "racism" has trumped their concern about sexism. This means that they have abandoned formerly colonized women of color, especially in Muslim countries and in Muslim communities in the West, to their Islamist fate. As you know, they have supported Western governmental policies of "multi-cultural relativism" with the same results.‖ – Phyllis Chesler, No More Harems: The Hidden History of Muslim and Ex-Muslim Feminism: The battle for women's rights is central to the battle for Europe and for western values.
You write: ―Fox News has a standing offer to let [Assange] openly broadcast on government approved public airways all day every day.‖ LOL. Are you joking? As far as I was aware, Fox News hates Wikileaks. FoxNews is not very interested in transparency, and most certainly not in bipartisan transparency. Same as Veterans Today. You got your hatred pot for the Jews, you want everything blamed on the Jews and rejoice when the Jews dirty linen is exposed, but you not so keen to expose Palestinian dirty linen. Fox News got their love for the Jews. You got more in common with Fox News than Julian Assange does. Assange supports transparency on pretty much anything, as far as I can tell; whereas you and Fox News only support transparency to expose your Left/Right wing ideological fundamentalist enemies dirty linen. Fox News National Security Analyst and host of FoxNews.com's "DefCon 3.": KT McFarland: Yes, WikiLeaks Is a Terrorist Organization and the Time to Act Is NOW11: ―The United States should move immediately and aggressively against WikiLeaks. And President Obama should take the following four steps: 1. Declare WikiLeaks a terrorist organization. Move to freeze its assets and have the Pentagon's new Cyber Command shut it down. 2. Shut the site down. The U.S. should urge fellow NATO ally Iceland (which hosts the WikiLeaks website) to shut it down, and suggest that if they do not do so immediately our relations will suffer. Ditto for any other country that steps up to host the website. 3. Get Assange's passport pulled. The president needs to get on the phone with the Australians (who are eagerly awaiting our call) and ask them to pull WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange‘s passport. Once he‘s cornered and can no longer travel, they can find him and charge him with espionage. Then the president can ask the country he‘s hiding in to extradite him to the United States and try him in a military tribunal. 4. Up the charges against Manning.
Fox News: Military Analyst: Retired United States Army Lieutenant Colonel Ralph Peters: 'Julian Assange Should be Killed'12. You further write: ―For those who never noticed, Julian Assange is the darling of Europe‘s ultranationalists and ―anti-immigration‖ crowd, seemingly a genetic twin to Andrew Breveik, the Norwegian mass murderer who killed 77 children of party members who supported the Israeli boycott.‖ As far as I am aware, most of Europe's ultra-nationalists, can't fucking stand Assange and Wikileaks, anymore than you or FoxNews can. In fact if anything binds you, Foxnews, and Europe's ultra nationalists together into an intellectual buttfucking orgy, it is your hatred for Assange and Wikileaks. Might too much transparency wake your brood sow human factory farm production factories up to Ecological reality? You Left and Right Wing Fundamentalists are playing your Left and Right Wing Masculine Insecurity Bullshit-the-Public Relations Human Factory Farming game to convince women to join your left/right wing human factory farms as brood sows to breed enough cannon fodder, so that 11 12
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2010/11/30/yes-wikileaks-terrorist-organization-time-act/ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rS5h59iZg3o
04/10/12 Veterans Today confirms Ecocentric Amicus Argument to USCAAF re Bradley Manning & Media
you can enforce your Left/Right Wing Humpty Dumpty definition of ‗innocent‘ and ‗guilty‘ on each other by force; while totally ignoring the inaccurate assumptions about Ecological reality underlying your Masculine Insecurity Anthropocentric law! The only link between Wikileaks and Breivik is myself, and its not even a link. I support transparency, as it is the foundation of my culture, and to the extent that Wikileaks supports transparency, I support Wikileaks. I don't agree with all Wikileaks does, I consider much of Wikileaks legal perspective to be Anthropocentrically delusional, and I have informed them of my legal opinions in writing, as an Amicus Curiae submission to the US Court of Appeals for Armed Forces13, copy at EcoFeminist vs. Anders Breivik14. I provided about half a dozen Veterans Organisations with a copy of the Amicus Curiae: 'King Condemned US Wars Intl Awareness Campaign'; 'Veterans for Peace: ExDir: Mike Reid'; 'Veterans for Peace: OfcMng: Virginia Druhe'; 'Veterans for Peace: CommCoor: Shelly Rocket'; 'War Crimes Times: Ed'; 'War Crimes Times: Clare'; 'Iraq Water Project: Art Dorland'; 'BradleyManningOrg: Emma'; 'Veterans for Peace'; 'VVAW: Vietnam Veterans Against the War'; 'GI Rights'; 'SOA: School of America's Watch'; 'United National Antiwar Coalition'; 'Prosecute US War Crimes Against Humanity Now' I also provided a copy to: 'NATO Public Information Office'; 'Norwegian Intel. Svc.'; 'NSA-CSS Chief'; 'NSA: Stuart Church'; 'Ray_McGovern_VIPS'; 'Ray_McGovern_VIPS'; 'Small Wars Journal; 'Swedish Sec. Svc'; CENTCOM Insp. Gen.; Blackwater/XE; Belgium Mil. Intel.; Bo Gritz; Bundesnachrichtendienst; Gen. Anthony Zinni; 'Karen Kiwatkowski'; 'US: NASA: ECHO Clearinghouse'; 'CENTCOM Com JTF Horn of Africa Public Affairs'; 'JAG: Dep Judge Adv Gen'; 'DoD: Media'; 'Estonia Min. of Defense'; 'Unified Quest'; 'Unified Quest'; 'Unified Quest'; 'Unified Quest'; 'US Army Environmental Command'; and 'Gen Stanley McChrystal'. Since that document I authored: the Amicus Curiae submission to the US Court of Appeals for Armed Forces in CCR/Wikileaks vs USA, is the only link between Breivik and Assange; I imagine that is the source of your allegation of ―Julian Assange is the darling of Europe‘s ultranationalists and ―anti-immigration‖ crowd, seemingly a genetic twin to Andrew Breveik, the Norwegian mass murderer who killed 77 children of party members who supported the Israeli boycott.‖ However your gross misinterpretation of my legal documentation filed in the CCR / Wikileaks vs USA matter, would fall flat on its face, if you provided your readers with access to the original documentation, so you, chose not to; in order to spread your smear mongering misinformation; thereby in fact proving the argument made in my Amicus: Bradley Manning canot get a free and fair trial, if the media don‘t practice scientific journalism transparency, and instead practice your yellow journalism misrepresentation and smear mongering. My link to Mr. Breivik: I support everyone's right to a free and fair trial, not just those who share my ideology (Radical Honoursty). Its called supporting the rule of law. I am aware you only support the rule of law for those whom you agree with (called mobjustice by honest people). To support the rule of law, you must support the rule of law for your enemy! I don't think you solve problems by scapegoating people. I believe dialogue and discussion about facts is far more conducive than calling people names like 'racist' and 'zionist' and 'islamophobe' and 'malthusian' and such horseshit. But then of course, my goal is problem solving of problems; whereas most everyone else‘s goals is pretend problem solving, to gain themselves a fucking fanclub for their parasitism and masculine insecurity ego. I ain‘t got no fanclubs, and I am the only member of the SHARP 13 14
http://sqswans.weebly.com/24-sep-amicus.html http://ecofeminist-v-breivik.weebly.com/24-sept-amicus.html
04/10/12 Veterans Today confirms Ecocentric Amicus Argument to USCAAF re Bradley Manning & Media
political party, cause it requires members to commit to SHARP’s Fully Informed Consenting Honour Contract Oath. As I wrote15 to Mr. Breivik: ―Moral Support for Rule of Law Free and Fair Trial does NOT Equate to Ideological Support: I must emphasize the following so that you are not under any false illusions. My support is not for your ideology. I am not a nationalist, nor a militant nationalist, nor have I ever claimed to be one. Nor do I discriminate against anyone who considers themselves a nationalist, however they may define ‗nationalist‘ or ‗militant nationalist‘.‖
You write: ―Few look behind the politics to the actual agenda of the New World Order, the ―Malthusians‖ who believe that there are simply what they call too many ―useless eaters.‖ Simplistically, as far as I can tell:
Non-Malthusians believe the earth is flat, and resources are infinite, hence they can breed and consume to their hearts content, cause there are no resource limits.
Malthusians believe the earth is not flat, resources are finite, and overbreeding and overconsumption leads to resource wars and in its last stages, the four horses of the apocalypse; hence anyone sincerely committed to avoiding the four horses of the apocalypse (as opposed to embracing it as their entry to hell/heaven) would require their flock to breed and consume in accordance to their nation/region‘s carrying capacity.
If that is your definition of Malthusian; I am indeed a Malthusian. As I stated in the EcoCentric Amicus submission – including Wikileaks: Permission to speak Mad Col. Jessop from Kyishodruk 16 - ‗You can‘t handle the - Thunderbolt of Flaming Wisdom - Truth‘: If you free yourself from the Anthropocentric Masculine Insecurity / Control of Reproduction MycroPhallophobia17Mindfuck prison leading humanity over the ecocide cliff, to confront Homer Lea18 he would declare19: The origin of war occurs in the self delusional bullshit belief of everyone who - like Urinetown‘s Hope Caldwell20 – believes they can selfrighteously pretend to oppose war, genocide and soldiers and Generals so-called war crimes, while endorsing the inalienable right of everyone to breed, consume as much as they like, whenever they like, wherever they like; and vote for more of the same. If you support the Inalienable Right to Breed and Vote; you are NOT ANTI-WAR. The only true innocent‘s in any war are the victims who lived a procreation and consumption lifestyle, with a footprint below their nations carrying capacity; thereby not contributing to overpopulation or resource wars.
If that makes me a Malthusian, then so be it. I have not the foggiest clue what Mr. Assange‘s views or Wikileaks views are on the matter. I speak only for SHARP and myself. 15
http://ecofeminist-v-breivik.weebly.com/rh-13-aug-2012.html Lama Drukpa Kunley lived in the 15-16th century (aka "Mad Saint" or ―Divine Madman‖ or Madman from Kyishodruk) for his unorthodox ways of painting Thunderbolt of Flaming Wisdom Erect Phallus‘ on walls, to shock the uppity and prudish Buddhist clergy. Traditionally erect penis symbols in Bhutan were to drive away evil spirits & malicious gossip. 17 Stocker C (2007/06/06) 18 ―[Valour of Ignorance] will someday be studied by thousands of people. Lea understood more about world politics than all the cabinet ministers now in office.‖ - Vladimir Lenin. Valour of Ignorance was compulsory reading for Japanese cadets, and recommended to West Point cadets by General MacArthur 19 Lea (1909): ―Only when arbitration is able to unravel the tangled skein of crime & hypocrisy among individuals can it be extended to communities & nations. As nations are only man in the aggregate, they are the aggregate of his crimes and deception and depravity, and so long as these constitute the basis of individual impulse, so long will they control the acts of nations.‖ 20 Heinberg (2006/04/30) 16
04/10/12 Veterans Today confirms Ecocentric Amicus Argument to USCAAF re Bradley Manning & Media
Respectfully,
Lara Johnstone
04/10/12 Veterans Today confirms Ecocentric Amicus Argument to USCAAF re Bradley Manning & Media
DRAFT: Interest to become Fully Informed about SHARP Principles. I understand that I cannot join SHARP until I consider myself Fully Informed and have sign the Consenting Honour Contract Oath: [I]
[II]
Honour Contract Oath: [A]
I _______________________, swear under oath that I:
[B]
Am honourably sincere and seriously concerned about solving our nations problems
Radical Transparency: Total Honesty is Foundation of Accountability: [A]
I understand that the party adheres to a management theory known as ‗radical transparency‘: a management or communication theory and practice that calls for total honesty as the foundation of accountability. All members are encouraged to sincerely and openly constructively criticize each other; and behind the back gossiping and sycophancy is totally verboten.
[B]
Radical Transparency Benefits1: Brutal sincere honesty, and most importantly a commitment to remain in the honest conversation with each other, until all emotions are spent and both have achieved understanding of each others points of view, leads to: (A) a worldview perspective based on reality not wishful thinking illusions; (B) overcoming individual fragile ego's; (C) building trust and intimacy; (D) empowerment of freethinkers: opportunity for true freedom of thought and problem solving; (E) abolishing office and party politics and ego-stroking sycophancy to 'climb the ladder', and finally (F) a true meritocracy.
1
Versions of Radical Transparency are currently practiced by three organisations we are aware of: (1) Delancey Street Foundation (www.delanceystreetfoundation.org): the worlds most successful rehabilitation program, where over 14,000 former drug addicts, murderers, felons, criminals and delinquents have rehabilitated themselves by means of Delancey Street Foundations radical transparency brutal honesty each-one-teach-one program; (2) Bridgewater Associates (www.bwater.com): the world‟s indisputably weirdest largest and best- performing hedge fund in the world; with 2010 returns greater than the profits of Google, Amazon and eBay combined. It is managed according to CEO Ray Dalio‟s Radical Transparency Principles; (3) Radical Honesty (www.radicalhonesty.com): founded by bestselling author Dr. Brad Blanton based upon this principles of Radical Honesty About Anger and Forgiveness, as detailed in his book: Practicing Radical Honesty.
23/04/2012 SHARP Form: Interest to become Fully Informed about SHARPs Principles
[III]
[IV]
Problem Solving, not Parasite Leeching: [A]
I understand that problem solving requires that:
[B]
the root cause of the problem be accurately defined and identified
[C]
citizens and politicians require the political will to act to eliminate the root cause of the problem
[D]
If or where a root cause of a problem is identified, and my behaviour contributes towards the problem; then I must be willing to confront my own behaviour and to find the will to amend my behaviour.
[E]
If I am repeatedly not willing to amend my behaviour, which is a contributory factor to the problem, I shall receive a notification from the party that the party is withdrawing from this ‗Honour Contract‘, due to my lack of honour and will to practice what I preach.
[F]
The termination of the ‗Honour Contract‘ shall mean that I am no longer a member of the party, and that the party has no obligation whatsoever to consider my ideas, suggestions or criticism as credible or serious, since I have deemed myself as lacking the honour and political will to practice what I preach.
Accurate Identification of Problems: [A]
I understand that: [1]
Root cause problem solving is impossible in a politically correct environment. I will not be allowed to demand that people refrain from offending me, because I am too lazy or egotistical to confront my own weaknesses and therefore demand that everyone pretend I don‘t have any. I will be expected to get over being offended, to learn about my underlying fragile egotistical issues weaknesses, confront them and work to overcome them.
[2]
If I question or dispute, any issue identified by SHARP Principles as an alleged ‗root cause‘ for any problem; I must attach the alleged root cause issue I dispute, including my written evidentiary reasons, attached to this ‗Honour Contract‘ Oath.
[3]
I shall be contacted to provide further evidentiary reasons or witness testimony, in the event that it is determined that SHARP‘s root causes were inaccurately identified. I shall be permitted to submit such evidence in a radically transparency hearing that is totally free from any notions of political correctness and interested purely in scientific evidence: the truth, whatever it may be. If or where I require ‗due order‘ of radical transparency proceedings policies to be broken in order to make any particular point; such proceedings may be so broken, if I present relevant evidence for the need to do so.
[4]
SHARP may also decide that the evidence I have submitted is not sufficient to alter the party‘s policy on said problem issue; and decline to enter into this ‗Honour Contract‘ with me. If so, SHARP shall provide me with written reasons, which I may appeal.
[5]
If SHARP accepts my ‗Honour Contract‘ with full understanding of my dispute on a particular problems root causes, I may continue to oppose – by Radical Transparency processes - the resolution of the problem as identified by SHARP.
23/04/2012 SHARP Form: Interest to become Fully Informed about SHARPs Principles
[V]
Problem of Masculine (Reason & Logic) Insecurity: Masculine Insecurity is a direct and indirect root cause and aggravating factor for most of the worlds problems, due to (A) obstructing Radical Transparency communication problem solving2, (B) is the cognitive foundation of the anti-Meritocratic Parasite Leeching Leadership3 (sic) Paradigm; (C) hence propagandizes an exponential growth of Parasite Leeching -- „walking penis procreation‟ overpopulation and „consume to demonstrate the size of my consumption penis‟4 overconsumption -- worldview. Put differently: [A]
Masculine Insecurity is not necessarily a masculine phenomena: but (I) because the majority of the worlds cultures have and continue to be patriarchal, the drivers of those cultures were men; (2) The concepts of ‗reason‘ and ‗logic‘ have been, and are described as masculine strengths, whereas emotion and intuition are ‗feminine‘ strengths. Hence I refer to this concept of ‗Logic and Reason Insecurity‘ as Masculine Insecurity.
[B]
Masculine Insecurity is the opposite of Radical Transparency: It is the psychological and intellectual inability to constructively and sincerely listen and engage in a search for the truth, with individuals whom you may disagree with. A desire to silence and ignore ideas which threaten the insecure masculine identity. Radical Transparency demands non-hierarchical recognition of all criticism and ideas and criticism are judged on their merit5, not the individuals socio-political status, because its ultimate focus is Problem Solving6. Masculine Insecurity (the opposite of Radical Transparency) only addresses criticism from those who are deemed socio-political peers; and if so, the discussion of the criticism is always discussed within the approved ‗masculine insecurity‘ worldview parasite leeching ‗Left Wing vs. Right Wing Political Control‘ paradigm7.
[C]
SHARP Neurological Concepts of Self: There is no ‗I‘ inside our brains. Our brains are simply a tool we are capable of using to analyse information. Masculine Insecurity fragile ego minds and cultures teach the belief as an alleged scientific certainty that our brain functions with a central controller, a decider of decisions, who is ―I‖. This is however just a fiction, a part of the story the Masculine Insecurity brains tells itself about
2
Problem solving leadership only acts towards solving any problem to enable the problem to be clearly and succinctly defined. Fanclubs and followers are eschewed, advice and suggestions towards clearly defining the problem are accepted based purely on merit of the suggestions, irrespective of individuals social-standing. 3 Parasitical Leeching Leadership generally choose some kind of ideology whereby they vaguely and ambiguously pretend to solve vague and abstract problems; while the predominant motive is to grow themselves a fan club/following, for their own socio-political or economic benefit. Their Parasite Leadership „problem solving‟ deliberately avoids any focus on clearly defining any problem, or any investigation of the root cause of the problem. Their primary focus is to divert their fan clubs attention towards the symptoms of the problem, using emotional blame game language focussed on another Parasitical Leeching Leaders fan club. Such Parasitical Leeching leaders – like WWF Wrestlers – thereby entrench the Parasitical Leeching Leadership paradigm (Fake Left Wing v Right Wing Political Paradigm Explained3). Put differently: The bath is overflowing, Parasitical Leeching Leaders focus their fan club on endlessly mopping up the floor; who is mopping, who isn‟t, etc. All attention towards defining the problem as the running tap is strictly avoided, including vilifying anyone who even mentions the possibility of a tap leaking being the source of the problem. The focus is to perpetuate the problem indefinitely while socio-politically exploiting the problem for personal gain, by means of manipulating the emotions of „followers‟, related to the symptoms of the problem. Ninety-Nine percent of the worlds so-called „leadership‟ is PARASITE LEECHING LEADERSHIP. 4 Edward Bernay‟s „Father of Public Relations‟ theories on using Masculine Insecurity to manipulate men and women for corporate purposes: basically to chance independent free thinking (I am my character and values) citizens into consumer zombies (I am my material possessions); as described in: The Century of the Self: (1) Happiness Machines, by Adam Curtis (BBC) http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=9167657690296627941 5 “Thurgood Marshall, later to become a US Supreme Court Justice, demonstrated another knack that would enhance his career: he listened. It was not simply that he was deferential; rather, he never thought he knew all the answers. His way to wisdom was to hear out others who might or might not know any more than he did and then to sift it all through his own mental strainer. He never tried to score points as an original or especially creative thinker; his skill was in figuring out who made the most sense -or what parts of other people's ideas to sieze upon and fuse into a prudent plan of action. "He'll take ideas from a chimneysweep if they sound right to him," said a former associate.” -- Simple Justice: The History of Brown v. Board of Education, the epochal Supreme Court decision that outlawed segregation, by Richard Kluger, 1975 6 Problem Solving Black Leaders Trayvon Martin Wisdom http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-770323 7 Left Wing vs. Right Wing Political Control Paradigm: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wMPAfDHEFbQ
23/04/2012 SHARP Form: Interest to become Fully Informed about SHARPs Principles
a self within (Churchland and Sejnowski, 1992; Dennett, 1991).8 The Radical Transparency Mind acknowledges that his/her ideas are not ‗I‘; just ideas, which can be easily changed, so s/he does not consider any criticism of her/his idea as an attack on ‗I‘. Masculine Insecurity concepts of self (―I think, I am unique‖) consider their ideas to be a fundamental aspect of ‗I‘; hence if you criticise a Masculine Insecurity Individuals idea, they feel personally attacked; hence their development of a concept of ‗dignity‘ that requires sycophancy, to protect its ‗I‘ from attack, not honesty.9 [D]
SHARP Concept of Dignity: SHARP does not share Masculine Insecurity‘s ―I Think, I am Unique‘ Neurological Concept of Self: In the Radical Transparency culture, our source of ‗dignity‘ is an inner process. Our dignity is not a result of how others treat us. Our dignity is a measure of the quality of our commitment to honourable Radical Transparency conduct towards others: i.e. the level of our honesty, firstly with ourselves,
8
Waking from the Meme Dream: Who Am I? Do I Exist?; by Susan Blackmore; Paper presented: The Psychology of Awakening: International Conference on Buddhism, Science & Psychotherapy Dartington 7-10 November 1996; also The Psychology of Awakening: Buddhism, Science & Our Day-to-day Lives. Ed. G.Watson, S.Batchelor and G.Claxton; London, Rider, 2000, 112-122 9 [..] The self is a key construct in several schools of psychology, referring to either the cognitive and affective representation of one's identity or the subject of experience. The earliest formulation of the self in modern psychology from the distinction between the self as I, the subjective knower, and the self as Me, the object that is known. The concept of Self is hardly an Absolute Factual Reality: There are many concepts of Self and there are even psychologists who denounce the concept of self, such as Nikolas Rose: He sees the concept of self as necessary for the mechanisms of advanced capitalism to function. In Inventing our selves: Psychology, power, and personhood, he proposes that psychology is now employed as a technology that allows humans to buy into an invented and arguably false sense of self. His book, Governing the Soul: the shaping of the private self, is widely recognised as one of the founding texts in a new way of understanding and analysing the links between expertise, subjectivity and political power. He argues that the proliferation of the 'psy' disciplines has been intrinsically linked with transformations in governmentality, in the rationalities and technologies of political power in 'advanced and liberal democracies'. [..] Another perspective to the evolution of how we believe our minds to be who we are, and hence believe our minds instructions; and how our minds came to believe many beliefs, such as for example that we were created in the image of God; can be found in bicameralism. In psychology, bicameralism is a hypothesis which argues that the human brain once assumed a state known as a bicameral mind in which cognitive functions are divided between one part of the brain which appears to be "speaking" (thought‟s as instructions), and a second part which listens and obeys. The second part thinks that the (thought) instruction from a „god‟. The term was coined by psychologist Julian Jaynes, who presented the idea in his 1976 book The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind, in which he argued that ancient peoples did not access consciousness (did not possess an introspective mind-space), but instead had their behavior directed by auditory hallucinations, which they interpreted as the voice of their chief, king, or the gods. Jaynes argued that the change from this mode of thinking (which he called the bicameral mind) to consciousness (construed as self-identification of interior mental states) occurred over a period of centuries about three thousand years ago and was based on the development of metaphorical (abstract) language and the emergence of writing. The idea that language is a necessary component of subjective consciousness and more abstract forms of thinking has been gaining acceptance in recent years, with proponents such as Daniel Dennett, William H. Calvin, Merlin Donald, John Limber, Howard Margolis, Peter Carruthers, and Jose Luis Bermudez. The implications of this new scientific paradigm extend into virtually every aspect of our psychology, our history and culture, our religion - and indeed, our future. In the words of one reviewer, it is "a humbling text, the kind that reminds most of us who make our living through thinking, how much thinking there is left to do." [..] Descartes philosophical statement of the conscious self, was Cogito ergo sum (French: Je pense donc je suis; English: "I think, therefore I am"), often mistakenly stated as Dubito ergo cogito ergo sum (English: "I doubt, therefore I think, therefore I am"), which became a fundamental element of Western philosophy. The simple meaning of the phrase is that if someone is wondering whether or not they exist, that is in and of itself proof that they do exist (because, at the very least, there is an "I" who is doing the thinking). The simplistic difference between a conscious and unconscious being would be (a) a mind wondering whether or not any „self‟ actually does exist; and (b) a mind told that it does exist, petrified of finding out it does not exist, who insists everyone else must treat it as if its existence is an absolute infallible fact . [..] If we are a conscious being, then our being uses our mind – an analytical tool -- to evaluate information, from numerous sources, analyse it and come to a conclusion. What is our mind‟s concept of self, the foundations for our belief in our dignity, etc? It is a fragile-ego autocratic dictatorial mind that chooses „I think, I am Unique‟, and the right to psychological infancy (sycophancy), as its definition for dignity. The world is littered with psychological infants addicted to sycophancy. Autocratic legal systems and psychological infant lawyers love psychological infant clients, to manipulate and exploit. It is their psychological equivalent to politicians baby kissing (A practice where politicians kiss babies in order to garner public support.) Hence lawyers addiction to „Right to Breed and Vote‟ and „Dignity: Right-to-sycophancy‟, laws that deliberately keep citizens in a state of psychological-infancy, because psychological infants are extremely easy to brainwash, to manipulate, as conquer and multiply cannon fodder. SHARP argues that the „I Think, I am Unique‟ meme, is (a) not founded on beyond reasonable doubt scientific evidence; (b) should not be considered legally as Sui Generis (unique) considering the contradictory memetic and neuroscience evidence, which at the very least means its concept of existential self is not unique, only one of many.
23/04/2012 SHARP Form: Interest to become Fully Informed about SHARPs Principles
and secondly to others; no matter how brutal. The greatest respect we can give another is to be 100% honest and transparent (naked) to them about who we are; and think of them in that particular moment. The greatest disservice we can do to our own sense of dignity; is to lack the courage to be honest and honourable; and to resort to sycophancy, twofaced politeness. Hence in Radical Honesty there is no such thing as another person ‗insulting our dignity‘; for we are the only one who can insult our dignity, by making a decision to lie to another, in order to manipulate them for our own personal psychological, emotional, political or socio-economic profit. [E]
10
Masculine Insecurity‟s Greatest Weapon: Parasite Leech‟s Brood Sows „wombs‟: [1]
Robert McElvaine: In Eve’s Seed: Masculine Insecurity, Metaphor, and the Shaping of History10, and Eve’s Seed: Biology, the Sexes and the Course of History, McElvaine described it thus: ―Karl Marx had it wrong. Class has, to be sure, been a major factor in history; but class itself is a derivative concept that is based on the ultimate causative power in history: sex. Marx‘s famous formulation must be revised: The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of struggles based on the division of our species into two sexes, jealousies emanating from this division, exaggerations of the differences between the sexes, misunderstandings about sexual reproductive power, and metaphors derived from sex. Together, these closely related matters constitute the most important, but largely neglected, set of motive forces in human history. Control -- or the claim of control -- over the means of reproduction has been even more fundamental to history than has control of the means of production. .. [..] Sexually insecure men often seek validation of their manhood by pursuing power. This is one of the reasons that the notawoman definition of manhood has had such an impact throughout history. All men do not suffer from such sexual insecurity, but those who do have frequently made their way into positions of power and so have had a disproportionate influence on the shaping of cultures and institutions… [..] The real importance of insecure masculinity, again, is that those men who suffer from it are most apt to seek power in order to compensate for their self doubts. Sexually linked motivations have been evident in men engaging in war since the earliest times.
[2]
Former Judge Jason G. Brent, Humans: An Endangered Species: ―We must all understand that the most potent weapons of war are the penis and the womb. Therefore, if you cannot convince a group to control its population by discussion, debate, intelligent analysis etc.; you must consider their action in using the penis and the womb to increase population, an ACT OF WAR.‖
[3]
Houari Boumediene, President of Algeria, at the United Nations, 1974: “The wombs of our women will give us victory.” [―One day, millions of men will leave the Southern Hemisphere to go to the Northern Hemisphere. And they will not go there as friends. Because they will go there to conquer it. And they will conquer it with their sons. The wombs of our women will give us victory.‖ (Boumediene was an ardent supporter of the ANC and SWAPO)]
http://www.fotim.ac.za/fotim_conferences/genderconf/papers/mcelvaine_paper.pdf
23/04/2012 SHARP Form: Interest to become Fully Informed about SHARPs Principles
[VI]
[4]
Yasser Arafat: Palestinian Womb is his people‟s greatest asset [Arnon Soffer, a geography professor at Israel's Haifa University and a lecturer at the Israeli Army's Staff and Command college, first warned of the impending Jewish demographic minority in the 1980s, but was widely dismissed. He predicted Arabs would outnumber Jews in both Israel proper and the occupied territories by 2010. In February 2001, the night of his election, Sharon sent an aide to ask Soffer for a copy of his 1987 treatise about the demographic threat to Israel; it was the same study that had led Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat to declare in the late 1980s that the "Palestinian womb" was his people's greatest weapon.]
[5]
Nelson Mandela‟s ANC: ANC „Operation Production‟ Policy: African women forced (I) to have sex with ANC cadres, & (2) not allowed to use contraception. Contravention meant detention, 'Apartheid agent' People‘s Court trial & sentence of Necklacing, incl. broken bottles shoved up their vagina. [Johannes Harnischfeger, Witchcraft and the State in South Africa11 (*German version of published in Anthropopos, 95/ 2000, S. 99-112): ―Especially evening assemblies girls had to attend as well: ―They would come into the house and tell us we should go. They didn't ask your mother they just said ‗come let's go.‘ You would just have to go with them. They would threaten you with their belts and ultimately you would think that if you refused, they would beat you. Our parents were afraid of them‖ (quoted by Delius 1996:189). All those opposing the wishes of the young men were reminded, that it was every woman‘s obligation to give birth to new ―soldiers‖, in order to replace those warriors killed in the liberation struggle. The idiom of the adolescents referred to these patriotic efforts as ―operation production‖. Because of exactly this reason it was forbidden for the girls to use contraceptives. (Delius 1996:189; Niehaus 1999:250)‖]
[6]
New Black Panther Party: Dr. Khalid Muhammad: Kill the White Woman as the White Man‟s Military Manufacturing Center rolling out reinforcement from between her legs: In Dr. Khalid Abdul Muhammad‘s 1993 'Kill the White Man' speech12, at Kean College in Union Township, New Jersey, he stated among others: ―Kill the women cause the women are the military manufacturing center; cause every nine months they lay down on their backs and reinforcement rolls out from between their legs. So shut down the military manufacturing center, by killing the white woman.‖
Problem of Overpopulation13: is a direct and indirect root cause and aggravating factor for most of our national and international problems: exponential resource use and decline, local national and international resource wars: crime, poverty, political correctness, etc. Solving the overpopulation problem to reach a state of ecological sustainable carrying capacity requires massive population reduction: [A]
I understand that:
11
http://why-we-are-white-refugees.blogspot.com/2009/12/ancs-embrace-of-occult-politics.html http://www.metacafe.com/watch/456363/khallid_muhammads_speech_kill_the_white_man/ 13 The population of an environment by a particular species in excess of the environment's carrying capacity. The effects of overpopulation can include the depletion of resources, environmental deterioration, and the prevalence of famine and disease. The carrying capacity of a biological species in an environment is the maximum population size of the species that the environment can sustain indefinitely. 12
23/04/2012 SHARP Form: Interest to become Fully Informed about SHARPs Principles
[VII]
[1]
Humane Personal Responsibility Policy: One Child Per Family Only Law: Every male has the right to father only one live child, and every woman has the right to one live birth
[2]
The right to either father a child or for a female to give birth can be sold or transferred; and a process shall be implemented to monitor such.
[3]
If a live child were born with a birth defect or with some other disability it would not permit either the father or mother to produce another child.
[4]
Each couple would have the right to have all appropriate pre-natal tests to determine if the child in the womb would be born with a birth or genetic defect and if the chance existed that the child would be born with such a defect to have an abortion.
[5]
Since survival of our species depends on the one child rule, under Judge Jason Brent‘s proposal (Humans: An Endangered Species14) any attempt to evade the rule would result in death of the evader and of any second child. The rule to be fair must be absolute, without a single exception. If the female cannot or refuses to provide the name of the father she and the child shall be immediately executed.
[6]
Since the policy is applied equally, no individual or group is harmed except to the extent that an individual cannot either father or give birth to a second child.
[7]
Since the birth of a child is very hard to hide, there must be communal responsibility and accountability for any attempt to do so. Those who knowingly failed to report the birth of a second or any higher number of children would themselves be subject to the very same severe punishment that would be meted out to the parents of the second or higher numbered child—no religious, cultural or ethnic exemptions would be approved.
Problem of Overconsumption15: is a direct and indirect root cause and aggravating factor for most of our nations ecological problems, of which the political and economic problems are simply symptoms of the deeper ecological problems. Peak Nonrenewable Natural Resources shall result in the impending collapse of industrial civilization, which cannot exist without these resources (Scarcity: Humanity‟s Last Chapter : A Comprehensive Analysis of Nonrenewable Natural Resource (NNR) Scarcity‟s Consequences, by Chris Clugston16): [A]
I understand that: [1]
Solving the overconsumption problem to reach a state of ecological sustainable carrying capacity requires massive consumption reduction
[2]
Further research shall be conducted to establish guidelines on reducing consumption. All suggestions are welcomed.
[3]
The final decisions shall be applied to all: no religious, cultural or ethnic exemptions would be approved.
14
http://in-gods-name.blogspot.com/2011/03/humans-endangered-species-i-power-of.html Over-consumption is a situation where resource-use has outpaced the sustainable capacity of the ecosystem. A prolonged pattern of overconsumption leads to inevitable environmental degradation and the eventual loss of resource bases. Generally the discussion of overconsumption parallels that of overpopulation; that is the more people, the more consumption of raw materials to sustain their lives. 16 http://in-gods-name.blogspot.com/2011/12/peak-nnr-scarcity-humanitys-last.html 15
23/04/2012 SHARP Form: Interest to become Fully Informed about SHARPs Principles
[VIII]
Welfare Problem: Contributes to Dependency on State: [A]
[IX]
[1]
Children are the responsibility of their parents and family.
[2]
Children who – as a result of austerity measures and hardship, or for whatever personal reasons – object to their parents having brought them into the world, may act to honourably depart, by informing their parents of their intentions, arranging a farewell with their friends. Their parents are obliged to provide for the funds to enable their honourable euthanasia/suicide. If you brought them into the world, and they don‘t want to remain here; it is your duty to provide them with the opportunity to leave in dignity.
[3]
Should their parents object to the child departing by euthanasia or suicide, the parents may offer to take care of their children in their home, which the children may accept, or not, as their preference.
[4]
Corporations are the responsibility of the capitalist or communist ideologically orientated managers and employees and if they cannot survive on their own hard work, values and ingenuity, then they must go bankrupt and learn from their mistakes.
[5]
No business is too big to fail.17
Corporate Ecological Predation: Legal Standing for Corporations to be Abolished: [A]
[X]
I understand that: All Individual and Corporate State Welfare will be abolished
I understand that: [1]
Legal Standing for Corporations shall be abolished
[2]
A system shall be established – after hearings heard on the matter – for severely simplifying the role of corporations in society.
Overhauling of the Justice System: [A]
Very Brief Overview: Setting a legal path towards a sustainable Ecocentrically founded legal system, based upon personal responsibility, the Justice system will be overhauled, for those who prefer such a system, to an Honour system.
[B]
Level 1: TTF: Trailer Trash Forgiveness: As practiced by the Radical Honesty culture, who enter into an agreement with each other, to resolve all their differences face to face (using Radical Honesty Terminology: Being Specific About Anger and Forgiveness18), not in passive aggressive Anthropocentric courts.
[C]
Level 2: CSVJ: Casper Sniper Vigilante Justice (SVJ): If you have made efforts to resolve your disagreement by means of TTF, but the individual refuses to meet with you to resolve the issue; then you can notify them that you are filing your complaint with the CSVJ, which provides them with 14 days to meet with you. If they do not meet with you, then their refusal to meet with you, authorises you to assassinate them (no torture or other fucked up shit allowed, only clean bullet to the brain assassination allowed), and remove their fucked up dishonourable genes from the planetary genepool. You are
17
FULL TRANSCRIPT: Iceland's President Explains Why The World Needs To Rethink Its Addiction To Finance http://www.businessinsider.com/olafur-ragnur-grimsson-iceland-2012-4 18
http://radical-honoursty.blogspot.com/2012/01/practicing-radical-honesty-being.html
23/04/2012 SHARP Form: Interest to become Fully Informed about SHARPs Principles
required to leave a copy of the CSVJ documentation at their corpse, or provide a copy to the Prosecutorial authority, so that they do not need to waste manpower to investigate the assassination, except in confirming the documentation as accurate and served. If you don‘t have any sniper or assassination skills, then you may hire someone who has registered with the CSVJ as a Dishonourable Genepool cleanser sniper.
[XI]
[D]
This will enable the reasonably quick Darwin-Award self-extermination of dishonourable cowards from the genepool, leaving the courageous and honourable, who require far less, if any supervision in terms of abiding by mutually agreed social contract principles.
[E]
So if you got fuck all honour, cause you don‘t intend to honour your word or resolve differences with people who have disagreements with you; face-to-face, in Gunnery Sgt language and volume intensity, if necessary for resolution; then it is best you don‘t bullshit yourself you are interested in joining SHARP.
[F]
If you do not as a matter of honour and integrity acknowledge receipt of documentation for your attention, FUCK OFF! Fuck off and go and be a cannon fodder brood sow or sperm donor for the Anthropocentric Human Factory Farming War Economy.
[G]
Casper Sniper Vigilante Justice (SVJ) is founded on the principle of confronting our Dishonourable Ghost, our fear of being honest and honourable and transparent about who we are, and what we honestly think, and in honour of the honesty of the Casper Viet Cong Hunting Club and Sgt. William Brown, 173rd Airborne Brigade and his Message to Vietnam19.
Professional Ethics and Pragmatism:
[XII]
I understand the party‘s policy on (A) professional ethics is to follow the truth wherever the truth leads us, which can only be done in a radical transparency environment; and (B) pragmatism, is to measure problem solving by what works, rather than emotional or ideological standards or intentions.
[XIII]
I understand that the party will require any individual interested in voting for the party to sign an Honourable Voter Contract Oath. The party is looking for practice what we preach personal responsibility committed problems solvers, not sycophantic ignorant cannon fodder zombies.
[XIV]
Intentions: Honourable Free Society of Men Who Rule Themselves: [A]
I understand that this ‗Honour Voting Contract‘ Oath is intended to: [1]
19
Raise citizens consciousness about conducting their affairs with their fellow citizens honourably: face to face, not like gutless cowards by backstabbing, deception and fraud.
http://why-we-are-white-refugees.blogspot.com/2011/10/ethno-cultural-nine-worthies-lessons-to.html
23/04/2012 SHARP Form: Interest to become Fully Informed about SHARPs Principles
[XV]
[2]
The party‘s intentions are to solve as many problems as quick as possible to the point where the smallest possible government can be achieved, that provides citizens with the greatest level of possible personally responsible (not anarchic) freedom
[3]
Mutual Coercion, Mutually Agreed Upon is the absolute Necessary Requirement for Freedom; to avoid the Tragedy of the Commons.
Notification of Interest to Join SHARP: [A]
Interest to join SHARP does not equate to joining SHARP. It only indicates that you indicate your sincere and honourable interest to become more fully informed about SHARP.
_______________________________
________________________
Signed.
Date.
23/04/2012 SHARP Form: Interest to become Fully Informed about SHARPs Principles