Architecture Infrastructure and the Future of Cape Canaveral Jeffrey S. Nesbit
Architecture, Infrastructure, and the Future of Cape Canaveral ARCH 604 Design Research Studio School of Architecture and Planning University of New Mexico Spring 2021 Student Participants Lisa DeMar, Isabella Grier, Maxwell Grummer, Geena Gutierrez, Martin Luna, William Lyons, Jacob Martinez, Nicholas Morse, Rym Naji, Rodrigo Natera, Dillon Romero, Kyle Rowbotham, Morgan Smith Research Sponsor United States Space Force, Cape Canaveral, Florida Research Institution School of Architecture + Planning, University of New Mexico Principal Investigator Dr. Jeffrey S. Nesbit Dean Robert A. González Associate Dean for Research Caroline Scruggs
Architecture Infrastructure and the Future of Cape Canaveral Jeffrey S. Nesbit
THE FUTURE OF CAPE CANAVERAL
This design research studio initiates research between the School of Architecture + Planning at the University of New Mexico with the United States Space Force (USSF). The collaboration seeks to study architecture of Cape Canaveral, research alternative infrastructural strategies, and propose future design solutions. The studio explores both the rich architectural history of launch complex infrastructure and provides design scenarios for addressing the future of facilities and landscape in Cape Canaveral’s Industrial Area. In coordination with the civil engineering department and leadership of USSF, specific facilities, sites, and subjects
4
School of Architecture + Planning / University of New Mexico / Spring 2021
are selected for study. The objects of study include infrastructure, blockhouse, Hangar N, and Hangar C. The series of provocations offer planning recommendations and design principles while addressing the site’s deep military history and imagine a new environmental future. This report is intended to further disseminate lessons learned from within the studio to expand future research capacities and offer support to the USSF leadership and Cape Canaveral civil engineering team. On the following pages, this research report includes student outcomes conducted over a four-month-long semester in an upper level graduate studio. Through a series of four key phases, the research study begins with initial observations, evaluates site, topography and geography, iterates through design strategies, and concludes with learning outcomes and recommendations. Three key design reviews are scheduled to discuss the progress of the research and to solicit feedback from experts, scholars, and design professionals.
5
THE FUTURE OF CAPE CANAVERAL
Acknowledgements We would like to thank all those who gave their time and keen insights on the progress of this research. We give special thanks to the United States Space Force, including Lt. Col. Joshua D. Connel, Andrew Duce, and Filemon Aragon. Without their support, none of this work would have been possible. We must thank the reviewers, advisors, and guests from diverse geographies, institutions, and disciplines who joined us throughout the semester. Each of you brought signifcant perspectives and offered incredible enthusiasm to the studio design and research, and for that we are thankful and remain in your debt. We are also thankful for the Univeristy of New Mexico School of Architecture + Planning administration and research assistance, especially Dean Robert Gonzalez, Associate Dean for Research, Caroline Scruggs, Lisa Stewart, Elizabeth Furu, Liz Castillo, and Nora Akram.
6
School of Architecture + Planning / University of New Mexico / Spring 2021
Reviewers / Advisors Katarzyna Balug Harvard Graduate School of Design
Julie Klinger University of Delaware
Wendy Whitman Cobb United States Air Force School of Advanced Air and Space Studies
Clare Lyster University of Illinois at Chicago
Dana Cupkova Carnegie Mellon Andrew Duce United States Space Force Gabriel Fries-Briggs University of New Mexico Matthew Haynes United States Army Special Operations Command Jonathan Irawan Hassell Studio Aleksandra Jaeschke University of Texas at Austin Kathleen Kambic University of New Mexico
Roland Miller Space Photographer Jeffrey Montes Blue Origin Fred Scharmen Morgan State University Charles Waldheim Harvard Graduate School of Design Alexander Webb University of New Mexico Nora Wendl University of New Mexico Andrew Witt Harvard Graduate School of Design
7
With an increase in rocket launches projected, this research envisions new architectural prototypes and design strategies for re-imagining a contemporary spaceport aesthetic.
THE FUTURE OF CAPE CANAVERAL
1 AU (astronomical unit) the distance from Earth to the Sun (93 million miles)
220
miles
17,227 mph
INFRASTRUCTURE PLANETARY SCALE
7,917.5
Investigation and acknolwedgment of U.S. Fish & Wildlife Conservation territory as a national infrastructure.
14
School of Architecture + Planning / University of New Mexico / Spring 2021
Polar Heliosynchronous
Right Ascension: Declination: Orbit Magnitude: Constellation:
Apollo Missio
12h 24m 12s +02° 07’ 07” 477,343 mi. -11.47 Virgo
ns
Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter ARTEMIS Chang’e 5-TI
Cape Canaveral 28.3922° N, 80.6077° W
Medium-Earth
Low-Earth
Geostationary
Geosynchronous
5 mi
15
THE FUTURE OF CAPE CANAVERAL
Lincoln Highway, 1913
United States Interstate System, 1956
San Francisco 37.7749° N, 122.4194° W
PACIFIC OCEAN
INFRASTRUCTURE NATIONAL SCALE
Investigation of U.S. coastal oceanic infrastructure surrounding Florida to understand present infrastructure at a regional scale.
20
School of Architecture + Planning / University of New Mexico / Spring 2021
New York 40.7128° N, 74.0060° W
ATLANTIC OCEAN
Cape Canaveral 28.3922° N, 80.6077° W
21
THE FUTURE OF CAPE CANAVERAL
NDBC Moored Buoys
NDBC C-MAN Stations
NOS Stations
Other
GULF OF MEXICO
INFRASTRUCTURE REGIONAL SCALE
Investigation of Launch Complexes at Cape Canaveral to understand present infrastructure at a local scale.
22
School of Architecture + Planning / University of New Mexico / Spring 2021
Cape Canaveral 28.3922° N, 80.6077° W
ATLANTIC OCEAN
23
THE FUTURE OF CAPE CANAVERAL
Launch Complex
Cape 28.39
INFRASTRUCTURE LOCAL SCALE
Investigation of orbital patterns, geospacial relationships, and international network lines in order to understand present infrastructure from a planetary scale.
24
School of Architecture + Planning / University of New Mexico / Spring 2021
LC-39B (Saturn V, Shuttle) LC-39A (Saturn V, Shuttle) LC-41 (Titan 3, Titan 4) LC-47 (Sounding Rockets) LC-37A/LC-37B (Delta IV) LC-34 (Saturn I, Saturn IB) LC-20 (Starbird, Titan 1, Titan 20 LC-19 (Titan 2, Gemini) LC-16 (Titan 1, Titan 2, Pershing) LC-15 (Titan 1, Titan 2) LC-14 (Atlas D Mercury) LC-13 (Atlas Agena) LC-12 (Atlas Agena) LC-11 (Atlas) LC-36 (Atlas 1, Atlas II) LC-1,2,3,4 (V-2 Bumper, Snark, Aerostat) LC-46 (Trident, LMLV) LC-21/22 (Bull Goose, Mace) LC-9/10 (Navaho) LC-31/LC-32 (Minuteman) LC-18 (Blue Scot, Vanguard, Thor Able) LC-17A/LC-17B (Delta II) LC-26 (Jupiter, Juno) LC-5/LC-6 (Redstone Mercury) LC-25 (Trident 1, Poseidon) LC-29 (Polaris) LC-30 (Pershing)
e Canaveral 922° N, 80.6077° W
ATLANTIC OCEAN
25
THE FUTURE OF CAPE CANAVERAL
Saturn V, Shuttle
1974
Remote Launch Vehicle Hangar
1970
Saturn V, Shuttle
19
Shuttle Landing Facility
1966
Launch Control Center
1967
SRB Rotation Processing + Surge Facility
65
Vehicle Assembly Building
Titan 3, Titan 3E, Titan 4
1984
Titan 3, Titan 4
Saturn I, S
Kennedy Space Center Industrial Area
1962
Saturn
Starbir Titan Tii
T
Cape Canaveral Industrial Area
1957
Navah MinuteMe Blue Scout, V Delta II Jupiter, Juno
19
5 19 54
Redstone Mercury Trident I, Poseidon T
19
59
-8
19
57
Polaris
LC 25 LC 29
Geo-Political Map: Site Level
26
School of Architecture + Planning / University of New Mexico / Spring 2021
19
RENAMING TIMELINE
67
5
LC 39 B
1950
LC 39 A
Joint Long Range Proving Ground (JLRPG) changed to Air Force Missile Test Center
4, Atlas V
19
1958
64
Vertical Intgration Building
LC 41
19644
LC 40
Vertical Integration Facility Solid Motor Assembly Building OR Payload Processing Facility
65
1964 4
19655
19
INTEGRATE-TRANSFER-LAUNCH ATE-TRANSFER-LAUNCH COMPLEX
1964 Cape Canaveral Missile Test Annex changed to Cape Kennedy Air Force Station (CKAFS)
Saturn IB
19 59
I, Saturn IB
61
19
52 -3
LC 36 LC 1, 2, 3 , 4
LC 46 LC 21-22
84 LC 9-10 19 7 5 6 LC 31-32 19 55LC 18 19 60 LC 17A - B 19 55 LC 26 19 6 5 LC 5-6 19 7 5
Bull Goose,, Mace ho en I-III, Pershing Vanguard
57
57 19
Atlas I,, Atlas las II V-2 V 2 Bumper, r,, Snark,, Aerostat
57
19 19
t Atlas
LC 37 A - B
19
Atlas Agnea g Atlas Agnea g
LC 34 LC 20
19
Atlas D,, Mercuryy
LC 15-16 LC 20 LC 31-32 LC 34 LC 36 LC 37 A-B KSC INDUSTRIAL
LC 39 A-B LC 40 LC 41 ITLC RLVH VEHICLE ASSEMBLY LAUNCH CONTROL
1973
9
tan 1,, Titan itan 2,, Pershing e shing ing
Titan 1,, Titan 2
Trident, dent,, LMLV
5 LC 19 19 59 LC 16 19 59 LC 15 19 58 LC 14 19 58 LC 13 19 6 5 LC C 12 LC 11
rd,, Titan I,, Titan II n 2,, Gemini
Air Force Missile Test Center changed to Cape Canaveral Missile Test Annex
LC 1-4 LC 5-6 LC 9-10 LC 11-14 LC 17 A/B LC 18 LC 21-22 LC 25 LC 26 CC INDUSTRIAL
SRB ROTATTION LC 46
Cape Kennedy changed back to Cape Canaveral
1992 Cape Canaveral Air Force Station (CCAFS) was redesignated Cape Canaveral Air Station (CCAS)
2000 Cape Canaveral Air Station (CCAS) was redesignated Cape Canaveral Air Force Station (CCAFS)
2020 Cape Canaveral Air Force Station (CCAFS) was redesignated Cape Canaveral Space Force Station (CCSFS)
LEGEND KSC/ CAPE CANAVERAL BOUNDARY TRANSMISSION LINES IMPORTANT ROADS RUNWAY IMPORTANT BUILDINGS ACTIVE LAUNCH COMPLEXES INACTIVE LAUNCH COMPLEXES
N 0
3
6 mi.
LAUNCH COMPLEXES OPEN FOR TOURISM
27
THE FUTURE OF CAPE CANAVERAL
01
28
School of Architecture + Planning / University of New Mexico / Spring 2021
Cape Canaveral is a public infrastructural landscape that must respond to respective social, political, and environmental concerns.
29
THE FUTURE OF CAPE CANAVERAL
02
30
School of Architecture + Planning / University of New Mexico / Spring 2021
Cape Canaveral’s obsolete launch complex infrastructure can be reformed by creating novel ecosystems and programmatic opportunities.
31
THE FUTURE OF CAPE CANAVERAL
03
32
School of Architecture + Planning / University of New Mexico / Spring 2021
Cape Canaveral blockhouses and existing infrastructure provide an opportunity to reimagine the place of the future.
33
THE FUTURE OF CAPE CANAVERAL
Rockets are elevated upon pedestals providing space for exhaust flames to disperse beneath their platforms. Over time, flame deflectors and trenches have been incorporated. Flumes and skimming basins help collect excess fluids produced during the sound suppression of launches. 42
School of Architecture + Planning / University of New Mexico / Spring 2021
43
THE FUTURE OF CAPE CANAVERAL
44
School of Architecture + Planning / University of New Mexico / Spring 2021
45
THE FUTURE OF CAPE CANAVERAL
White Room
Electronics + Mechanical Second Launch Umbellical Tower + Platforms
Retractable Work Plates
Railings
White Room Floor Plates
Platforms Wiring + Fuel Lines
Launch Stand Platform
Stairs
Erector Tower Floor Plates Erector Tower
Railings
Lights Crane Rocket
Ducting LUT Platforms
46
Water, Fire + Sound Supression
Rocket Engines
School of Architecture + Planning / University of New Mexico / Spring 2021
Arms (connected to White Room)
Railings
LAUNCH COMPLEX 19
Launch Complex 19 (LC-19) is a deactivated launch site used by NASA to launch all of the Gemini manned spaceflights. It was also used by unmanned Titan I and Titan II missiles.
Central Core With Mechanical Equipment
Platforms
LC-19 was in use from 1959 to 1966, during which time it saw 27 launches, 10 of which were manned. The first flight from LC-19 was on August 14, 1959 and ended in a pad explosion, extensively damaging the facility, which took a few months to repair. The first successful launch from LC-19 was also a Titan I, on February 2, 1960. After being converted for the Titan II ICBM program in 1962, LC-19 was later designated for the Gemini flights. After the program concluded in December 1966, LC-19 was closed down. The Gemini white room from the top of the booster erector has been partially restored and is on display at the Air Force Space and Missile Museum located at Complex 26.
47
THE FUTURE OF CAPE CANAVERAL
Dome
Roof
Periscopes Railings
Structure
Catwalk Framing
Stairs
Ceiling
Vents
Exterior Metal Walls
Doors
Catwalk Railings Catwalk Posts
Stairs
Catwalk Stairs
Doors
Concrete Wall Mass
48
School of Architecture + Planning / University of New Mexico / Spring 2021
Mirror
4” PVC Elbow
BLOCKHOUSE 14
4” PVC Drain Pipe
4” PVC Threaded Adapter
4” PVC Adapter Mirror
Mirror Motor Mirror
Motor
LC-14 was the first Atlas pad in operation and hosted the test flights in 1957–58. It was also the only one of the original four pads to never have a booster explode on it. By 1959, it was decided to convert the pad for the Atlas D missile and space launches, and a large service tower was added early in the year. The first Atlas flown from the renovated LC-14 was Missile 7D on May 18; however, a problem with the launcher hold-down arms damaged the missile and caused its explosion shortly after launch. This was traced to improper procedures during the renovation of the pad and was quickly fixed. The first space launch off of LC-14 was the Big Joe Mercury test in September. As the designated Mercury-Atlas facility, LC14 was thus the only Atlas pad sporting the infrastructure needed for manned launches. The first MIDAS satellites, one Atlas-Able launch, and a few more ICBM tests were conducted from LC-14 before it was completely turned over to NASA.
Main Servomotor
49
THE FUTURE OF CAPE CANAVERAL
Roof s
Mechanical Doors Ceiling
Interior Windows Exterior Wall
Roofs
Additions
Interior Wall Structure
Exterior Wall
s
Interior Doors
Structure
Side Windows
Interior Wall
Stairs Interior Walls
Foundation
52
School of Architecture + Planning / University of New Mexico / Spring 2021
Jamb Panel
Top Track Door Header Panel Recess Panel Track
Wheels
Doors
Located on Florida’s Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, Hangar S was crucial to NASA’s early human spaceflights and became a hub of activity as America prepared to send its first astronauts into space. The 61,300-square-foot facility housed astronaut training, crew quarters and early spacecraft processing. Throughout the early 1960s, NASA engineers and technicians developed capabilities that enabled revolutionary advances in exploration, enhancing knowledge well beyond what could have been imagined at the time. Much of that work took place in Hangar S.
Bottom Track Top Track
Track -to- Door Attachment
HANGAR S
Hatch Panel
Built by the U.S. Air Force in 1957, Hangar S originally served as an aircraft maintenance and storage hangar. Soon after, it housed operations of the U.S. Naval Research Laboratory’s Project Vanguard. The 75-foot-tall rocket was part of the nation’s earliest efforts to launch Earth orbiting satellites.
Floor Track
53
THE FUTURE OF CAPE CANAVERAL
54
School of Architecture + Planning / University of New Mexico / Spring 2021
55
THE FUTURE OF CAPE CANAVERAL
56
School of Architecture + Planning / University of New Mexico / Spring 2021
57
THE FUTURE OF CAPE CANAVERAL
Various landform generation strategies coupled with remediation processes may produce more ecologically harmonious landscape infrastructure opportunities supporting spaceport longevity.
58
School of Architecture + Planning / University of New Mexico / Spring 2021
59
THE FUTURE OF CAPE CANAVERAL
60
School of Architecture + Planning / University of New Mexico / Spring 2021
61
THE FUTURE OF CAPE CANAVERAL
62
School of Architecture + Planning / University of New Mexico / Spring 2021
63
THE FUTURE OF CAPE CANAVERAL
Topography 1
66
Topography 2
School of Architecture + Planning / University of New Mexico / Spring 2021
Topography 3
67
THE FUTURE OF CAPE CANAVERAL
68
School of Architecture + Planning / University of New Mexico / Spring 2021
69
THE FUTURE OF CAPE CANAVERAL
70
School of Architecture + Planning / University of New Mexico / Spring 2021
71
THE FUTURE OF CAPE CANAVERAL
SYSTEM IN ACTION
BLOCKHOUSE 3 & 4 RESTORATION CENTER
PRIMARY RESTORATION ZONE: VEGETATION/SOIL RECOVERY
72
SECONDARY RESTORATION ZONE: WATER RECOVERY
School of Architecture + Planning / University of New Mexico / Spring 2021
Existing Land
VEGETATION BARRIOR BERM REPURPOSED “Y” TUNNEL FOR WATER IRRGATION
Concrete Infrastructure
Building Placements
Removal of Invasive Infrastructure
Reformation Zones
EXPLODED SYSTEM VIEW
73
THE FUTURE OF CAPE CANAVERAL
AZ
COMPLEX 3 & 4
BA COMPLEX 36
COMPLEX 1 & 2
BB
N 23
24
25
Cape Canaveral - Launch Complex 3-4
74
School of Architecture + Planning / University of New Mexico / Spring 2021
03
Description of Section
Description of Section
Description of Section
RESTORATION ZONE: VEGETATION/SOIL RECOVERY
SECONDARY RESTORATION ZONE: WATER RECOVERY & LAGOON VIEWING DECK
BLOCKHOUSE 3 & 4 RESTAURANT & VIEWING TOWER
A | Northwest Elevation
04
Description of Section
Description of Section
Description of Section
RESTORATION ZONE: VEGETATION/SOIL & WATER RECOVERY
SECONDARY RESTORATION ZONE: WATER RECOVERY
BLOCKHOUSE 3 & 4 RESTAURANT / VIEWING TOWER & EV CHARGING STATION
B | Northwest Elevation
75
THE FUTURE OF CAPE CANAVERAL
Operative Method: Earth Moving Many blockhouses are situated on enormous concrete foundations that do not allow plant and wildlife to retake the space. This operative can be applied to almost any adaptation formulated and can create aesthetically pleasing and formally creative exteriors. The concrete form has the ability to carry the load requirements of a natural green roof and slopes gently enough for soil establishment. 80
School of Architecture + Planning / University of New Mexico / Spring 2021
Adaptation #1: Combining earth movement, folding and augmentation.
Adaptation #2: Combining inversion, fragmentation and perforation.
Adaptation #3: Combining inversion, fracturing and folding.
Adaptation #4: Combining severing, inversion, separation, and fracture.
81
THE FUTURE OF CAPE CANAVERAL
LC 34 Blockhouse Remodel
Detail #1
86
Detail #2
School of Architecture + Planning / University of New Mexico / Spring 2021
Detail #3
87
THE FUTURE OF CAPE CANAVERAL
LC 34 Blockhouse Remodel 88
School of Architecture + Planning / University of New Mexico / Spring 2021
89
THE FUTURE OF CAPE CANAVERAL
Contingent Ecologies of Cape Canaveral. From Left to Right: Palmetto Coastline, Launch Complex Scrub Oak, Restored Salt Marsh.
90
School of Architecture + Planning / University of New Mexico / Spring 2021
DATA CENTER
COMMUNITY POOL
DEMOLITION TUBES
SURF SHOP & PURIFICATION
LAUNCH VIEWING
COMMERCIAL FRANCHISE
91
THE FUTURE OF CAPE CANAVERAL
92
School of Architecture + Planning / University of New Mexico / Spring 2021
93
THE FUTURE OF CAPE CANAVERAL
Launch Complex 34: Enlarged view of blockhouse 34 redevelopment as data storage facility. Ground and walkable groundcover added to the top of structure. Doors are shown open for ULA Launch viewing. Beginning of cableway cooling pump system seen in bottom left.
94
School of Architecture + Planning / University of New Mexico / Spring 2021
95
THE FUTURE OF CAPE CANAVERAL
Launch Complex 34: Enlarged interior view of blockhouse 34 as data storage facility and launch viewing center. Outer catwalk for access to second-tier computational racks and access to launch viewing parasopes. Inner catwalk for maintenance of radiant cooling tower and inspection.
96
School of Architecture + Planning / University of New Mexico / Spring 2021
97
THE FUTURE OF CAPE CANAVERAL
Launch Complex 14: Enlarged interior view of blockhouse 14 as dobsonian observatory and planetarium. Telescope is mounted to hydraulic lift system to remove from view during operation of planetarium. Telescope view patterns are synced with specific celestial occurances via roof aperture. Secondary roof aperture used for human eye night time viewing from indoors. Main level operates as USSF/USFS Cape Canaveral Conservation Center.
98
School of Architecture + Planning / University of New Mexico / Spring 2021
99
THE FUTURE OF CAPE CANAVERAL
100
School of Architecture + Planning / University of New Mexico / Spring 2021
101
THE FUTURE OF CAPE CANAVERAL
102
THE FUTURE OF CAPE CANAVERAL
ZONE 1: INFRUSTRUCTURAL IMPACTS
AMERICAN ALLIGATOR
6 MILE RADIUS
CAPE C ANA VE RA LR OC KE
DEPO STIO N: D EPE ND EN TO NW IN D
ROCKET EMISSION
INFUSTRUCTURAL EMISSIONS
CARBON DIOXIDE
ENDANGERED BY ROCKET EMISSIONS
DI RE CT IO N
EMISSIONS BY ZONE
3
FOAMY SAND SOFT SEDIMENT BEDROCK
ROCKET EMISSIONS AND SURROUNDING ECOLOGICAL SECTION
School of Architecture + Planning / University of New Mexico 104
SURFACE WATER ACIDIFICATION KILLS FISH DURING LAUNCH PROCESS
WATER AQUIF POLLUTED BY HAVE BEEN L ROCKETS. TH ARE COLLEC UNDERGROU
ZONE 2: ENDANGERED ECOLOGY
ZONE 3: MARINE ECOLOGY
UTILIZING THE REMOTE LOCATION
UTILIZING THE BEACH
ET
SULFURIC COMPOUNDS
ALUMINUM OXIDE
NITROGEN
Y ET AF
US ADI HR C UN LA
CARBON MONOXIDE
CARBON DIOXIDE
S
School of Architecture + Planning / University of New Mexico / Spring 2021
BEACH MOUSE
WHITE TAIL DEER
3 MILE RADIUS
FERS ARE ALSO Y EMISSION THAT LEAKED BY HESE POLLUTANTS CTED IN UND AQUIFERS.
WOOD STORK BIRD
RAINWATER KILLFISH
SHEEPS HEAD MINNOW
MOSQUITO FISH
LOGGERHEAD TURTLE
RISING SEA LEVELS
ACCOUSTICAL NOISE LEVELS REACHED OVER 160 dBA AT TIME OF LAUNCH
PONDS OR SMALL BODIES OF WATER ARE THE MOST VULERNABLE DURING THE LAUNCH PROCESS. THESE SMALL BODIES OF WATER ARE AFFECTED WITH THE MOST POLLUTION AND EMISSION FROM ROCKET LAUNCHES
105 19
THE FUTURE OF CAPE CANAVERAL
Hangar Addition #1
Existing Ha
Rai
Endangered Plants RAINWATER HARVESTING CONTAINED INTERIOR ENVIORNMENT PARKING / STORAGE / WORKSPACE
ENVIORNMENTAL PROBLEMS
CONCRETE PAVED OPEN AREA
Enclosure Diagram
Research Enclosure
ROCKET EMISSIONS AND SURROUNDING ECOLOGICAL FUTURE
School of Architecture + Planning / University of New Mexico 110
Endangered Animals
Sus
School of Architecture + Planning / University of New Mexico / Spring 2021
angar “N”
Hangar Addition #2
inwater Harvesting
stainable Energy
Hangar “N” will be the stepping stone towards a green sustainable furture for Cape Canaveral.
SUSTAINABLE SOLUTIONS
Reduced Emissions
111 39
THE FUTURE OF CAPE CANAVERAL
ROCKET EMISSIONS AND SURROUNDING ECOLOGICAL FUTURE
School of Architecture + Planning / University of New Mexico 112
School of Architecture + Planning / University of New Mexico / Spring 2021
113 55
THE FUTURE OF CAPE CANAVERAL
120
School of Architecture + Planning / University of New Mexico / Spring 2021
121
THE FUTURE OF CAPE CANAVERAL
122
School of Architecture + Planning / University of New Mexico / Spring 2021
123
THE FUTURE OF CAPE CANAVERAL
128
School of Architecture + Planning / University of New Mexico / Spring 2021
129
THE FUTURE OF CAPE CANAVERAL
130
School of Architecture + Planning / University of New Mexico / Spring 2021
131
THE FUTURE OF CAPE CANAVERAL
132
School of Architecture + Planning / University of New Mexico / Spring 2021
133
THE FUTURE OF CAPE CANAVERAL
140
School of Architecture + Planning / University of New Mexico / Spring 2021
141
THE FUTURE OF CAPE CANAVERAL
142
School of Architecture + Planning / University of New Mexico / Spring 2021
143
THE FUTURE OF CAPE CANAVERAL
Composite juxtaposing planetary urbanization with Cape Canaveral inundated by 8-feet of seawater.
146
School of Architecture + Planning / University of New Mexico / Spring 2021
147
Faculty Researcher Dr. Jeffrey S. Nesbit Student Participants Lisa DeMar, Isabella Grier, Maxwell Grummer, Geena Gutierrez, Martin Luna, William Lyons, Jacob Martinez, Nicholas Morse, Rym Naji, Rodrigo Natera, Dillon Romero, Kyle Rowbotham, Morgan Smith Reviewers / Advisors Katarzyna Balug, Wendy Whitman Cobb, Dana Cupkova, Andrew Duce, Gabriel Fries-Briggs, Matthew Haynes, Jonathan Irawan, Aleksandra Jaeschke, Kathleen Kambic, Julie Klinger, Clare Lyster, Roland Miller, Jeffrey Montes, Fred Scharmen, Charles Waldheim, Alexander Webb, Nora Wendl, Andrew Witt Research Sponsor United States Space Force, Cape Canaveral, Florida