Corruption: US District Court for the Eastern District of California - Sacramento
Unethical judicial conduct, pro-government bias and other controversies regarding the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. Most EDCA judges are former state or federal prosecutors, state court judges, or both, and allegedly convey a pro-government, pro-law enforcement bias in the adjudication of federal civil rights cases against law enforcement officers, government employees, prison officials, state court judges, and government officials. EDCA judges reportedly do not disclose conflicts of interest as required by law. Sacramento County Superior Court whistleblowers and court reform advocates assert that EDCA judges are jointly and collectively responsible for the cover-up of systemic civil rights violations, honest services fraud, and RICO racketeering by Sacramento Family Law Court judges, judge pro tem attorneys, and court employees against indigent, financially disadvantaged and disabled pro per litigants.
