Survey Report
1 of 6
https://courseval.umflint.edu/etw/ets/et.asp?nxappid=WCQ&nxmid=Ass...
Winter 2012 Course Evaluation 201220 2012 Course:
University of Michigan Flint
F3.01.15025935 - MUS185.ECE120
Department:
Responsible Karen Salvador Faculty:
Resp. Rec'vd / Expected:
Overall Mean: 4.3 5-Point Likert Scale w/NA
MUS 5 / 15
(65 responses)
Graph Legend F3.01.15025935 MUS Courses All Courses
F3.01.15025935 University Wide Course Questions
Responses
--- Comparisons ---
Course
[SA] [A] [U] [D] [SD] N/A
MUS
Grp. Std. Mode Low High S.D. Var. N Mean Med. Err.
All
Grp. Grp. Mean Pct Mean Pct Med. Med.
Overall, this was an excellent course.
2
2
1
0
0
0
4.3
4,5
3
5
.75
.56
.33 5
4.2
4.7
4.5
27
4.3
4.1
44
I learned a great deal Q2 in this course.
2
2
1
0
0
0
4.3
4,5
3
5
.75
.56
.33 5
4.2
4.7
4.5
25
4.4
4.2
40
I had a strong Q3 desire to take this course.
2
0
1
1
1
0
3
5
1
5
1.60 2.56 .72 5
3.2
4.4
4
17
4.1
3.8
13
Q1
Number of Courses / Survey Responses used for Comparisons:
49 / 303
1,303 / 13,544
Responses: [SA] Strongly Agree=5 [A] Agree=4 [U] Undecided=3 [D] Disagree=2 [SD] Strongly Disagree=1 Pct = Percentile Rank (Higher is better)
5/7/12 12:15 PM
Survey Report
2 of 6
https://courseval.umflint.edu/etw/ets/et.asp?nxappid=WCQ&nxmid=Ass...
Graph Legend Salvador, Karen MUS Faculty All Faculty Salvador, Karen University Wide Instructor Questions Overall, the instructor Q4 was an excellent teacher.
Responses
Individual
[SA] [A] [U] [D] [SD] N/A
2
3
0
0
--- Comparisons ---
0
0
MUS
Grp. Std. Mode Low High S.D. Var. N Mean Med. Err.
4.3
4
4
5
.49
.24 .22 5
4.4
Grp. Grp. Mean Pct Mean Pct Med. Med.
4.8
Number of Individuals / Survey Responses used for Comparisons:
All
4.6
50 / 302
26
4.5
4.2
47
1,305 / 13,490
Responses: [SA] Strongly Agree=5 [A] Agree=4 [U] Undecided=3 [D] Disagree=2 [SD] Strongly Disagree=1 Pct = Percentile Rank (Higher is better)
5/7/12 12:15 PM
Survey Report
3 of 6
https://courseval.umflint.edu/etw/ets/et.asp?nxappid=WCQ&nxmid=Ass...
Graph Legend Salvador, Karen MUS Faculty All Faculty
Salvador, Karen College of Arts and Sciences Instructor
Responses
--- Comparisons ---
Individual
[SA] [A] [U] [D] [SD] N/A
MUS
Grp. Std. Mode Low High S.D. Var. N Mean Med. Err.
All
Grp. Grp. Mean Pct Mean Pct Med. Med.
Q5
The instructor set high standards for students.
3
1
0
1
0
0
4.7
5
2
5
1.17 1.36 .52 5
4.2
4.6
4.5
20
4.5
4.4
26
Q6
The instructor was enthusiastic about the subject matter.
4
1
0
0
0
0
4.9
5
4
5
.40
.16
.18 5
4.8
4.8
4.7
44
4.7
4.5
63
Q7
The instructor was well-prepared for each class/unit.
3
2
0
0
0
0
4.7
5
4
5
.49
.24
.22 5
4.6
4.8
4.7
34
4.7
4.4
50
Q8
The instructor provided opportunities in class for students to ask questions and/or make comments.
3
2
0
0
0
0
4.7
5
4
5
.49
.24
.22 5
4.6
4.7
4.6
46
4.7
4.5
46
Q9
The instructor was willing to
3
2
0
0
0
0
4.7
5
4
5
.49
.24
.22 5
4.6
4.6
4.4
56
4.6
4.4
61
5/7/12 12:15 PM
Survey Report
4 of 6
https://courseval.umflint.edu/etw/ets/et.asp?nxappid=WCQ&nxmid=Ass...
help students outside of class. The instructor made efforts Q10 to improve student learning.
3
2
0
0
0
0
4.7
5
4
5
.49
.24
.22 5
4.6
4.7
Number of Individuals / Survey Responses used for Comparisons:
4.5
51 / 297
44
4.6
4.3
63
728 / 7,722
Responses: [SA] Strongly Agree=5 [A] Agree=4 [U] Undecided=3 [D] Disagree=2 [SD] Strongly Disagree=1 Pct = Percentile Rank (Higher is better)
5/7/12 12:15 PM
Survey Report
5 of 6
https://courseval.umflint.edu/etw/ets/et.asp?nxappid=WCQ&nxmid=Ass...
Graph Legend F3.01.15025935 MUS Courses All Courses
F3.01.15025935 College of Arts and Sciences Course
Responses
--- Comparisons ---
Course
[SA] [A] [U] [D] [SD] N/A
MUS
Grp. Std. Mode Low High S.D. Var. N Mean Med. Err.
All
Grp. Grp. Mean Pct Mean Pct Med. Med.
I am doing Q11 well in this course.
2
3
0
0
0
0
4.3
4
4
5
.49
.24 .22 5
4.4
4.7
4.5
35
4.3
4.1
61
The course requirements and grading Q12 criteria were clearly defined.
2
2
1
0
0
0
4.3
4,5
3
5
.75
.56 .33 5
4.2
4.7
4.6
17
4.6
4.4
29
The course gave me the Q13 opportunity to think critically.
2
3
0
0
0
0
4.3
4
4
5
.49
.24 .22 5
4.4
4.5
4.3
41
4.5
4.3
47
Number of Courses / Survey Responses used for Comparisons:
49 / 296
724 / 7,682
Responses: [SA] Strongly Agree=5 [A] Agree=4 [U] Undecided=3 [D] Disagree=2 [SD] Strongly Disagree=1 Pct = Percentile Rank (Higher is better) Q14 - Comment on the workload for this class. Response Rate: 80.00%
(4 of 5)
Overall this class was ok. I personally feel as though we got more out of working with the 4 yr olds. I would focus more on that aspect of the class and ways to work with children. These are things that will be more usful in a job setting. As far as work load, I - think it was fair. I found it hard to follow at times what we did in class and it's relevance to the working with kids. It seemed as though we were taking 2 different classes at times. I think that Karen did a nice job, but at times I think she forgot this was a 100 level course and that we are not all music majors. She has very high standards. - the workload was excellent, i learned a great deal - the workload was fair, and clearly stated in syllubus - Their was a workload, but I enjoyed this course because we were given plenty of time to get our work done. Q15 - What did you like best about the course? Response Rate: 80.00%
(4 of 5)
Working with the 4yr olds was the best part of the class. It gave hands on experience that I feel is much more valuable than book work. I will remember more for actually doing activities than sitting in a room talking about theorists. Not that these theorists weren't importnant people, I just don't see the importance of them in a beginning music class. I think we spent way too much time on them.
5/7/12 12:15 PM
Survey Report
6 of 6
-
https://courseval.umflint.edu/etw/ets/et.asp?nxappid=WCQ&nxmid=Ass...
i enjoyed the peer teaching assignment the most because we were able to witness th progression of our individual groups and i think we all have grown since day one
- practicum - Having the chance to work hands-on with the children at the ECDC. Q16 - What suggestions would you make for the improvement of the course? Response Rate: 40.00%
(2 of 5)
Touch on the theorists, don't spend as much time on them. Focus more on ways to work with the young kids. I realize that she wants "quality" music for the kids, but I also think it's important to remember that we're not all going to be music majors and that - exposing kids to a variety of music is what's important. I also think she needs to remember to be professional in her conversation with students and remember that something she may think is funny, may be offensive to someone else. I don't think it was done purposely, but I think it's something she needs to be aware of. Overall Karen seems to be a very p.c. person. -
more guide on final project. more opportunity to peer teach. specific things to look for while at practicum. maybe an additional test or some quizzes to help drill in the concepts
5/7/12 12:15 PM