SEMESTER #8
INTERNSHIP PORTFOLIO
KARTIK SHARMA
A/2930/2016
SCHOOL OF PLANNING AND ARCHITECTURE, NEW DELHI
\\ Kartik Sharma | A/2930/2016
2
\\ Kartik Sharma | A/2930/2016
3
\\INDEX
\\INDEX
\\OFFICE CAMPUS
...... 05
CONFIDENTIAL TECH. CLIENT, HYDERABAD
1. \\PROJECT INTRODUCTION
...... 06
2. \\TOWER - 01 (EARTH)
...... 08
3. \\TOWER - 02 (WATER)
...... 16
4. \\TOWER - 03 (WIND)
...... 23
5. \\TOWER - 04 (FIRE)
...... 36
6. \\TOWERS - GENERAL DRAWINGS
...... 45
7. \\BRIDGE FLOORS - THIRD FLOOR
...... 49
8. \\BRIDGE FLOORS - FOURTH FLOOR
...... 54
9. \\BRIDGE FLOORS - FIFTH FLOOR
...... 58
10. \\BRIDGES SPECIAL AREAS
...... 63
11. \\COORDINATION DRAWINGS
...... 74
\\USGBC GREENBUILD CONFERENCE
...... 77
\\GENSLER RESEARCH GRANT
...... 80
INTERNAL OFFICE PRESENTATION
VISUALIZING CARBON: A DESIGN APPROACH TO EMBODIED CARBON
\\ Kartik Sharma | A/2930/2016
4
\\INDEX
TOWER 4
\\OFFICE CAMPUS
TOWER 1
CONFIDENTIAL TECH. CLIENT, HYDERABAD TOWER 3
TOWER 2
\\ Kartik Sharma | A/2930/2016
5
\\INTRODUCTION
\\INTRODUCTION
#SITEPLAN
The project is an Office Park of a Million Square Feet scope area for a Confidential Tech. Client based in Hyderabad, India.
TOWER 4
TOWER 1
TOWER 3
TOWER 2
The Program has Four Towers of themes of Nature, namely - Earth, Water, Wind and Fire - captured through the use of materials , finishes and design decisions. These towers are interconnected at Three floors using bridges which in totality form linked network between the towers at the given floors whilst framing the Central Courtyard which sits on the Podium. A major emphasis of this project has been the quality of both the work and social spaces in order to strike a refreshing balance between the two while maintaining the aesthetic and professional value. #INTRODUCTION
\\ Kartik Sharma | A/2930/2016
6
\\INTRODUCTION
#GROUNDFLOOR PLAN
#DESIGN REVISIONS \\ Kartik Sharma | A/2930/2016
7
\\TOWER 1
TOWER - 01
\\EARTH
\\ Kartik Sharma | A/2930/2016
8
\\TOWER 1
\\TOWER 1
#SITEPLAN
#GROUNDFLOORPLAN
\\GROUND FLOOR LOBBY
#VIEWS & ELEVATIONS
#ELEVATIONS
\\ Kartik Sharma | A/2930/2016
9
\\TOWER 1
#VIEWS & ELEVATIONS \\TOWER PLANS
#TYPICALFLOOR PLAN
#THIRDFLOOR PLAN
#REFLECTED CEILING PLAN
\\ Kartik Sharma | A/2930/2016
10
\\TOWER 1
#WALLFINISH PLAN \\ELEVATION DWGS
\\ Kartik Sharma | A/2930/2016
11
\\ELEVATION DWGS
\\TOWER 1
\\ Kartik Sharma | A/2930/2016
12
\\SOCIAL SPACES
\\TOWER 1
#TYPICALFLOOR DESIGNS \\SOCIAL SPACES
#THIRDFLOOR DESIGN \\ Kartik Sharma | A/2930/2016
13
\\SOCIAL SPACES
\\TOWER 1
#FOURTHFLOOR DESIGN \\SOCIAL SPACES
#FIFTHFLOOR DESIGN \\ Kartik Sharma | A/2930/2016
14
\\SCREEN DESIGN
\\TOWER 1
\\ Kartik Sharma | A/2930/2016
15
\\TOWER 2
TOWER - 02
\\WATER
\\ Kartik Sharma | A/2930/2016
16
\\TOWER 2
\\TOWER 1
#SITEPLAN
#GROUNDFLOORPLAN
\\GROUND FLOOR LOBBY
#VIEWS & ELEVATIONS \\ Kartik Sharma | A/2930/2016
17
\\TOWER 2
\\GARAGE SPILLOUT
#GROUNDFLOOR PLAN
#GARAGE SPILLOUT DESIGN \\ Kartik Sharma | A/2930/2016
18
\\TYPICAL STAIRCASE @GROUND FLOORS
\\TOWER 2
\\SOCIAL SPACES
#TYPICALFLOOR DESIGN \\ Kartik Sharma | A/2930/2016
19
\\TOWER 2
#TYPICALFLOOR DESIGN \\ Kartik Sharma | A/2930/2016
20
\\SOCIAL SPACES
\\TOWER 2
#THIRDFLOOR DESIGN
#FOURTHFLOOR DESIGN
#FIFTHFLOOR DESIGN \\ Kartik Sharma | A/2930/2016
21
\\VC ROOM @SOCIAL SPACES
\\TOWER 2
#THIRDFLOOR DESIGN
NOTE: THE FOLLOWING TO BE ADAPTED TO FIFTH FLOOR FINISHES SCHEME AS PER REVISIONS.
#FOURTHFLOOR DESIGN
\\ Kartik Sharma | A/2930/2016
22
\\TOWER 3
TOWER - 03
\\WIND
\\ Kartik Sharma | A/2930/2016
23
\\TOWER 3
\\TOWER 3
#SITEPLAN
#GROUNDFLOORPLAN
\\GROUND FLOOR LOBBY
#GROUNDFLOORPLAN
#ELEVATION \\ Kartik Sharma | A/2930/2016
24
\\TOWER 3
\\GARAGE SPILLOUT
#OLD DESIGN
#NEW DESIGN
#SPILLOUT DESIGN \\ Kartik Sharma | A/2930/2016
25
\\GARAGE SPILLOUT
\\TOWER 3
#DESIGN UPDATE
#DESIGN UPDATE \\ Kartik Sharma | A/2930/2016
26
\\GARAGE TESTFITS
\\TOWER 3
#CLASSROOM OPTION
#COLLABORATIVE OPTION
#GROUPWORKING OPTION
\\ Kartik Sharma | A/2930/2016
27
\\TYPICALFLOOR
\\TOWER 3
#TYPICALFLOOR PLAN
#ELEVATIONS
\\ Kartik Sharma | A/2930/2016
28
\\SOCIAL SPACES
\\TOWER 3
#TYPICALFLOOR PLAN
#TYPICALFLOOR DESIGN
\\ Kartik Sharma | A/2930/2016
29
\\TOWER 3
#FIRSTFLOOR PLAN
#FIRSTFLOOR DESIGN
\\ Kartik Sharma | A/2930/2016
30
\\TOWER 3
#TYPICALFLOOR PLAN
#TYPICALFLOOR DESIGN
\\ Kartik Sharma | A/2930/2016
31
\\TOWER 3
#FIRSTFLOOR PLAN
#FIRSTFLOOR DESIGN \\ Kartik Sharma | A/2930/2016
32
\\TOWER 3
#TYPICALFLOOR PLAN
#TYPICALFLOOR DESIGN
\\ Kartik Sharma | A/2930/2016
33
\\SOCIAL SPACES
\\TOWER 3
#THIRDFLOOR DESIGN
#THIRDFLOOR DESIGN
#FOURTHFLOOR DESIGN \\ Kartik Sharma | A/2930/2016
34
\\TOWER 3
#FOURTHFLOOR DESIGN
#FIFTHFLOOR DESIGN
#FIFTHFLOOR DESIGN \\ Kartik Sharma | A/2930/2016
35
\\TOWER 4
TOWER - 04
\\FIRE
\\ Kartik Sharma | A/2930/2016
36
\\TOWER 4
\\TOWER 4
#SITEPLAN
#GROUNDFLOORPLAN
\\SOCIAL SPACES
#TYPICALFLOOR PLAN
#TYPICALFLOOR DESIGNS \\ Kartik Sharma | A/2930/2016
37
\\TOWER 4
SCHEME A
#TYPICALFLOOR DESIGN
SCHEME B
#TYPICALFLOOR DESIGN \\ Kartik Sharma | A/2930/2016
38
\\TOWER 4
SCHEME C
#TYPICALFLOOR DESIGN \\OFFSHORE DEVELOPMENT CENTER REDESIGN
#SPACE REDESIGN
\\ Kartik Sharma | A/2930/2016
39
\\TOWER 4
#SPACE REDESIGN OPTION-01
#SPACE REDESIGN OPTION-02
\\ Kartik Sharma | A/2930/2016
40
\\TOWER 4
\\EXECUTIVE BUSINESS CENTER
TOWER 4
TOWER 1
TOWER 3
TOWER 2
#LOCATION
#FLOOR PLAN
#FLOOR PLAN
\\ Kartik Sharma | A/2930/2016
41
\\TOWER 4
#3D VISUALIZATION
#3D VISUALIZATION
#3D VISUALIZATION
\\ Kartik Sharma | A/2930/2016
42
\\TOWER 4
#3D VISUALIZATION
#3D VISUALIZATION
#3D VISUALIZATION \\ Kartik Sharma | A/2930/2016
43
\\TOWER 4
#3D VISUALIZATION
#3D VISUALIZATION
#3D VISUALIZATION \\ Kartik Sharma | A/2930/2016
44
\\TOWERS
TOWERS
\\GENERAL DWGS
\\ Kartik Sharma | A/2930/2016
45
\\TOWERS LOBBY FLOORING
\\TOWERS
#GENERAL DESIGN INTENT
#OTHER LAYOUT OPTIONS
#TOWER 1 LOBBY LAYOUT DETAIL \\ Kartik Sharma | A/2930/2016
46
\\TOWERS’ LOCKERS
\\TOWERS
#LOCATION & NUMBERS
#DESIGN & CALCULATIONS
\\ Kartik Sharma | A/2930/2016
47
\\TOWERS
\\TOWERS’ MATERIAL SCHEDULES
#MATERIAL SCHEDULES \\ Kartik Sharma | A/2930/2016
48
\\BRIDGES - 3F
BRIDGE FLOORS
\\THIRD FLOOR
\\ Kartik Sharma | A/2930/2016
49
\\BRIDGES - 3F
\\BRIDGES - 3F
#COLOR THEMES
#THIRDFLOOR PLAN
\\ Kartik Sharma | A/2930/2016
50
\\BRIDGES - 3F
\\BRIDGE - 01
#THIRDFLOOR PLAN
#BRIDGE-01 PLAN
#THIRDFLOOR DESIGN \\ Kartik Sharma | A/2930/2016
51
\\BRIDGES - 3F
\\BRIDGE - 02
#THIRDFLOOR PLAN
#BRIDGE-02 PLAN
#THIRDFLOOR DESIGN \\ Kartik Sharma | A/2930/2016
52
\\BRIDGES - 3F
#THIRDFLOOR DESIGN \\BRIDGE - 03
#THIRDFLOOR PLAN
#BRIDGE-03 PLAN
#THIRDFLOOR DESIGN \\ Kartik Sharma | A/2930/2016
53
\\BRIDGES - 4F
BRIDGE FLOORS
\\FOURTH FLOOR
\\ Kartik Sharma | A/2930/2016
54
\\BRIDGES - 4F
\\BRIDGES - 4F
#COLOR THEMES
#FOURTHFLOOR PLAN
\\ Kartik Sharma | A/2930/2016
55
\\BRIDGES - 4F
\\BRIDGE-01
#FOURTHFLOOR PLAN
#BRIDGE-01 PLAN
#FOURTHFLOOR DESIGN \\BRIDGE-02
#FOURTHFLOOR PLAN
#BRIDGE-02 PLAN
\\ Kartik Sharma | A/2930/2016
56
\\BRIDGES - 4F
#FOURTHFLOOR DESIGN \\BRIDGE-03
#FIFTHFLOOR PLAN
#BRIDGE-03 PLAN
#FOURTHFLOOR DESIGN \\ Kartik Sharma | A/2930/2016
57
\\BRIDGES - 5F
BRIDGE FLOORS
\\FIFTH FLOOR
\\ Kartik Sharma | A/2930/2016
58
\\BRIDGES - 5F
\\BRIDGES - 5F
#COLOR THEMES
#FIFTHFLOOR PLAN
\\ Kartik Sharma | A/2930/2016
59
\\BRIDGES - 5F
\\BRIDGE - 01
#FIFTHFLOOR PLAN
#BRIDGE-01 PLAN
#FIFTHFLOOR PLAN
#BRIDGE-02 PLAN
#FIFTHFLOOR PLAN
#BRIDGE-02 PLAN
\\BRIDGE - 02
\\BRIDGE - 03
\\ Kartik Sharma | A/2930/2016
60
\\BRIDGES \\SCREEN DESIGN
#FRONT ELEVATION
#SECTION
#PLAN
#DWGS
WOODEN PANEL 12MM THK EPOXY SEALANT MS PLATE 20MM X 3MM MS PLATE 10MM X 3MM MS BOX SECTION FRAME 40MM X 50MM WOODEN PANEL 12MM THK
#DETAIL DWG \\ Kartik Sharma | A/2930/2016
61
\\SOCIAL STAIRCASE @BRIDGE 2
BRIDGES’ SPECIAL AREAS
\\SOCIAL STAIRCASE @BRIDGE 2
\\ Kartik Sharma | A/2930/2016
62
\\SOCIAL STAIRCASE @BRIDGE 2
\\SOCIAL STAIRCASE @BRIDGE 2
#FLOOR PLANS \\ Kartik Sharma | A/2930/2016
63
\\SOCIAL STAIRCASE @BRIDGE 2
#ELEVATIONS
#DESIGN SECTION
\\ Kartik Sharma | A/2930/2016
64
\\SOCIAL STAIRCASE @BRIDGE 2
\\FOURTH FLOOR
#FOURTHFLOOR PLAN
#BRIDGE-02 PLAN
#WALLFINISHES
#DESIGN UPDATES \\ Kartik Sharma | A/2930/2016
65
\\SOCIAL STAIRCASE @BRIDGE 2
#DESIGN UPDATES \\ Kartik Sharma | A/2930/2016
66
\\SOCIAL STAIRCASE @BRIDGE 2
#FOURTHFLOOR DESIGN \\ Kartik Sharma | A/2930/2016
67
\\SOCIAL STAIRCASE @BRIDGE 2
#FOURTHFLOOR DESIGN \\FIFTH FLOOR
#FIFTHFLOOR PLAN
#BRIDGE-02 PLAN
#WALLFINISHES \\ Kartik Sharma | A/2930/2016
68
\\SOCIAL STAIRCASE @BRIDGE 2
#FIFTHFLOOR DESIGN \\ Kartik Sharma | A/2930/2016
69
\\SOCIAL STAIRCASE @BRIDGE 2
#FIFTHFLOOR DESIGN \\DECORATIVE LIGHTING
\\ Kartik Sharma | A/2930/2016
70
\\SOCIAL STAIRCASE @BRIDGE 2
#FIFTHFLOOR DESIGN \\ Kartik Sharma | A/2930/2016
71
\\GARAGE @BRIDGE 1
BRIDGES’ SPECIAL AREAS
\\GARAGE @BRIDGE 1
\\ Kartik Sharma | A/2930/2016
72
\\GARAGE TESTFITS
\\GARAGE @BRIDGE 1
#CLASSROOM OPTION
#COLLABORATIVE OPTION
#GROUPWORKING OPTION
\\ Kartik Sharma | A/2930/2016
73
\\COORDINATION DWGS
COORDINATION DWGS
\\GFC DWGS + LIGHTING DWGS
\\ Kartik Sharma | A/2930/2016
74
\\GFC DRAWINGS
\\COORDINATION DWGS
Similar to following drawings, the drawing coordination and revisions were done with the Local Architect’s Office based on the drawings provided to them by Gensler.
#ELEVATION CORRECTIONS \\ Kartik Sharma | A/2930/2016
75
\\LIGHTING DRAWINGS
Similar to following drawings, the drawing coordination and revisions were done with the Lighting Consultant based on the drawings provided to them by Gensler.
\\COORDINATION DWGS
#LIGHTING DESIGN COORDINATION
\\ Kartik Sharma | A/2930/2016
76
\\INTERNAL PRESENTATION
\\USGBC GREENBUILD CONFERENCE
INTERNAL OFFICE PRESENTATION
\\ Kartik Sharma | A/2930/2016
77
\\INTERNAL PRESENTATION
\\INTERNAL PRESENTATION
The USGBC Greenbuild Conference was held on the 6th - 7th February, 2020. Gensler being a USGBC member was given a chance to attend the various lectures offered at the venue - ITC Gardenia, Bangalore.
A choice of 18 lectures was given to be attended over 2 days with 3 lectures taking place simultaneously i.e., one had to choose 1 of 3 lectures per session. Being the only one from Genlser attending the conference, the following is a brief overview of the Internal Presentation outlining the experience and The conference was presided by the President and general learning from the conference. CEO of USGBC and GBCI - Mr. Mahesh Ramanujan. This conference was attended not only by professionals of Architecture background, but even Engineering, Interior Design, Business and Educational backgrounds. DE-CODING GREEN CODES, STANDARDS AND RATING SYSTEMS This lecture elucidated and explored the differences between Codes, Standards and Rating systems - the major difference - them being mandatory, ideal and aspirational respectively. Also Codes are usually the bare minimum that need to be incoorporated in the design (legally speaking) while Standards and Rating Systems seem to incentivise the higher benchmarks of green initiatives.
BUILDING A CIRCULAR ECONOMY: THE ESSENTIAL ROLE OF BUILT ENVIRONMENTS Trash and garbage being a forefront environment degredation contributor, the idea of circular economy seems to do away with the idea of garbage generation in all possible cases by utilising the waste produced as primary materials for other processes. The lecture and interaction here emphasized on the importance of this circular ideology when it comes to manufacture of products and services but till now, there is not a widescale practice of a circular setup in the field of core architecture as majority of the projects end up in landfill at the end of their lifecycle. \\ Kartik Sharma | A/2930/2016
78
\\INTERNAL PRESENTATION TOWARDS A SUSTAINABLE START: DECISION MAKING PROCESS DURING MASTER PLANNING THROUGH ANALYSIS This lecture was conducted in an attempt to inform the audience of the advantages in terms of design quality and workability when each step of design is properly analysed so as to make an informed decison. Conducted by an Architect from the offices of Haffeez Contractor Architects, they eplained the advantages using their own real time and award winning projects which was actually very insightful and inspiring.
SUSTAINABILITY AND EQUITY LEADERSHIP WITH LEED FOR CITIES AND COMMUNITIES This lecture had a number of speakers, all from different organisations and backgrounds. One talked about the LEED standards and how they were able to make Dubai the first LEED Platinum City. The next speaker was a part of the Bangalore Public Action Comittee (BPAC), who worked to inspire the idea of civic engagement and social resposibilities as the duty of all citizens and especially the professionals for a better neighbourhood. The final speaker was a memeber of the Auroville community who walked us through the concept and genesis of the society at Auroville.
NET POSITIVE BANGALORE: STRESSED TO WATER POSSITIVE -
WATER
With decreasing resources, especially in Bangalore where the green cover has plumetted from 70% in 1970s to <2% in 2020, this lecture was aimed towards identifying the roots of these problems and then adopting strategies from various projects done to improve the conditions. Case studies of campuses such as IIM, Trichy and Infosys, Hubli were studied and even IoT solutions in practices were explored.
MATERIAL CERTIFICATIONS AND BEYOND: INSIGHTS FROM THE INDIAN MARKET Mostly taking from the LEED v4.1, this session defined what is refered to as “Better” materials as materials with an overall low carbon, healthy and circular cycle. Importance of Lifecycle Assessments (LCA), Environmental Product Declaration (EPD) and Product Category Rules (PCR) were explored while also informing on how to stay vigilante and avoiding the “Greenwashed” materials which use vague descriptions and legal loopholes to sound ‘green’ when they actually are the very opposite.
\\ Kartik Sharma | A/2930/2016
79
\\GENSLER GRANT PROPOSAL
\\GENSLER RESEARCH GRANT
VISUALIZING CARBON: A DESIGN APPROACH TO EMBODIED CARBON
\\ Kartik Sharma | A/2930/2016
80
\\GENSLER GRANT PROPOSAL
\\GENSLER GRANT PROPOSAL
A COLLABORATIVE PROPOSAL FOR THE GENSLER RESEARCH GRANT WHILE WORKING WITH AR. ERIK BARTH (BOSTON, USA) AND TEAM.
Visualizing Carbon: A Design Approach to Embodied Carbon Project Description (max. 300 words) Our goal is to identify the best construction materials to use for embodied carbon benefits given a particular project location and type. The construction industry is currently the cause of about 40% of all global carbon emissions. Designing with low embodied carbon materials will enable us to reach our GC3 goals to tackle climate change and further link value to resilient design. Our research will create spaces that appeal to the full human experience of place and meaning tied to a sound sustainability story. We will use mass timber as a baseline construction material due to its ability to sequester carbon, minimize waste and construction efficiency. Gensler has currently designed over 5,000,000 square feet of mass timber projects, solidifying our global leadership role in the industry. We will then apply the methodology used for mass timber analysis to other construction materials. The framework for our analysis will be based on the entire lifecycle of products from manufacturing to end of life. These four steps to our research and deliverables are achievable over the coming year and can be scaled to incorporate further study: 1. Definition of embodied carbon for mass timber 2. Analysis of regional availability and transportation offsets 3. Translation to other products (concrete, steel, etc.) 4. Comparison to other projects, firms and operational carbon How will your research deliver client value? To what kinds of projects, clients, and/or audiences will this research be applicable? (max. 300 words) Our research will deliver client value by illuminating the complex carbon story behind material choices for current and future projects. Our goal is to create a system to weigh embodied carbon against regional material availability to build a sound sustainability story. Shifting the value perception of materials based on embodied carbon will be fundamental in serving our clients and achieving our firmwide GC3 goal to further link value to resilient design. To anticipate future client demand, we will develop the methodology for the design and client teams to better understand embodied carbon as it applies to their particular project and community. We will document, analyze and compare client directed studies from active projects like PMX in Toronto and relevant studies from partner organizations. From our findings, we will create visual aids and an interactive tool for clients and Gensler designers to better understand material design implications. The content we create can be used to educate and encourage clients who are not already considering the issue of embodied carbon to factor it into their decision making. Although our clients typically have admirable sustainability goals, key project players often struggle to understand how they can be achieved. Clients like Sidewalk Labs, Google, Amazon and others are actively asking for Gensler to deliver embodied carbon metrics. Our research and findings will empower clients and designers to see the true â&#x20AC;&#x2DC;carbon valueâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; in design choices as directly linked to the financial bottom line. How will you conduct the research? What will be your key outcomes and deliverables? (max. 300 words) Like our team, our study is multi-regional. We have a comprehensive understanding of project types and clients based on our involvement in projects around the country and world. We will pick up where partner organizations Generate Technologies MIT, Tallwood Institute, and Atelier 10 research have left off to translate carbon analysis into a Gensler specific format. Based on our findings, we will implement methodologies used by these organizations on other Gensler projects to understand embodied carbon in context. We will limit the initial study variables to mass timber and mixed use buildings in the northeast, northwest and southwest regions. Expanding on prior study, we will weigh the carbon impact based on material sourcing, transportation metrics, and project-specific criteria. With the system we create for these first two steps, we can translate the study to other materials like concrete, steel, aluminum and others. From the data and findings, we will produce the following deliverables: 1. A presentation that compiles research findings into a cohesive format that can be used by clients and designers alike. This abstract would review global trends and strategy to reduce embodied carbon in Gensler projects. 2. A guide that hierarchically ranks project types and regions based on the carbon profile of a particular material. For example, CLT may have the lowest embodied carbon footprint when used in an 160,000 SF office building in the southeast region of the United States. 3. An interactive tool that produces material recommendations based on early project metrics. This tool would translate project location and size into a ranked embodied carbon material list.This tool could be applied to other materials and contexts for systems comparison. Do you plan to partner with any external collaborators? If so, please list: We are actively engaged with Atelier 10 on PMX Toronto and have a completed, detailed carbon study we will reference and build upon. Our team has an open dialogue for potential future collaboration with Generate Technologies/MIT, who have done similar life cycle analysis of mass timber. These and other potential partners are listed below: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.
Tallwood Institute (Judith Sheine) Simpson Gumpertz and Heger (Mark Webster) Le Messurier (Michael Gryniuk) Architecture 2030 (Lindsay Rasmussen) Leers Weinzapfel Associates (Tom Chung) Lake Flato (Casey Farren)
\\ Kartik Sharma | A/2930/2016
81
KARTIK SHARMA | A/2930/2016
SCHOOL OF PLANNING AND ARCHITECTURE, NEW DELHI