Manchester Communication Academy
September 2015
Catch Up Premium Report Year 7 End of Year 2015 English
Manchester Communication Academy
September 2015
English Cohort—Catch up premium (CUP) 53 students were less than level 4 on entry to year 7 in English IN 2015. This accounts for 26% of the whole year cohort. 74% are level 4 or above. Context of group < Level 4 = 53 Students NUM
Full Time
Boys Girls WBRI OTHER PP NPP EAL
Whole Year Group- 205
%
NUM English 47.17 101 52.83 104 32.08 89 67.92 116 84.91 153 15.09 52 41.51 61
25 28 17 36 45 8 22
% 49.26 50.73 43.41 56.58 74.63 25.36 29.75
Key Points:
The gender split in CUP cohort is in line with the whole year group.
The group has a higher proportion of EAL & ethnic students than in the whole year group
There are 10% more students eligible for PP in CUP cohort.
The starting points for the whole year group is: 1c 2
1b 1
1a 1
2c 3
2b 1
2a 3
3c 16
KS 2 Entry 3b 3a 13 13
4c 50
4b 31
4a 24
5c 38
5b 8
5a 1
Below level 4 at the end of year 7 38 out of 53 achieved a least level 4 at the end of the year. 15 students were not achieving a level 4 at the end of the year. A breakdown of their grades were: Summer 2 - Current level 3C 3B
2A
KS2 Start
1C 2C 2B 2A 3C Grand Total
2 2
4
Grand Total 2 3 1
1 1 1 1
Key Making better than expected progress Making expected progress Intervention
Of the students who were below a level 4 at the end of the year 7, 80% have made expected progress or better, whilst 40% of those students had made better than expected progress. Reading Age increase
3A
2 4
2
2
4 6
7 15
Progress: Based on two sub levels per Progress Better than Expected Intervention
Average entry
Average end
Average improve-
6 yr 9 mo
8 yr 5 mo
18.7 months
(sub level 4 cohort)
6
40
6 3
40 20
Manchester Communication Academy
September 2015
English Cohortâ&#x20AC;&#x201D;Catch up premium (CUP) Cup students achieving level4 At the end of the year 38 students had moved above a level 4. A breakdown of their grades were: Summer 2 - Current level 4B 4A 1 1
4C
KS2 Start
1B 1A 2A 3C 3B 3A Grand Total
1 7 10 1 19
2 2 9 15
5C
1 3 3
1
Grand Total 1 1 1 9 13 13 38
Progress 18 Better than expected Expected 19 1 Intervention
Of the students who had moved above a level 4 at the end of the year 7, 97.36 % have made expected progress or better, whilst 52.94% of those students had made better than expected progress.
47.36 50 2.63
Overview of progress made by the students who were below a level 4 at the start of the year. Of the original 53 students who started year 7 below a level 4, a breakdown of their grades at the end of the summer term were: Summer 2 - Current level
2A
KS2 Start
1B 1A 1C 2A 2B 2C 3C 3B 3A Grand Total
3C
3B
1
1 1 2
3A
4C
2
1
4
7 10 1 19
4B 1 1
4A
5C
2
2
4
1
4
Of the students who were less than a level 4 at the start of year 7, 98.11 % have made expected progress, whilst 58.49% of those students had made better than expected progress.
6
2 2 9 15
1 3 3
Progress of CUP cohort 31 Better than expected Expected 21 1 Intervention
1
Grand Total 1 1 2 3 1 3 16 13 13 53
58.49 39.62 1.88
The progress of this cohort compares favourably to the whole year group were 78% made expected progress and 30% have made better than expected
Better than expected Expected Intervention
Progress < level 4 NUM % 31 58.49 21 39.62 1 1.88
Whole year group NUM % 62 30.24 97 47.31 46 22.43
Manchester Communication Academy
September 2015
Year 7â&#x20AC;&#x201D;Mid term admissions Mid term admissions During Year 7, 10 students entered the Academy as mid term admissions or INA who were below level 4.
Mid Term
Contextual - 10 NUM Boys 7 3 Girls WBRI 0 10 OTHER PP 1 9 NPP Mid term 4 6 INA < level 4 9 1 >= level 4
% 70 30 0 100 10 90 40 60 90 10
At the end of the year, 4 students had progressed to level 4 or above 1C 1C 2C 3C 3B 3A 4C Grand Total
1A
2A
1
3A
4C
4B
4A
Grand Total
1 1 2
1
1
1 1 1
Progress Number 5 Better than expected 2 Expected Intervention 3
1
1
2
1 2
1
2
2 1 4 1 1 1 10
% 50 20 30
Typically, these students were international new arrivals, not eligible for pupil premium . Provision for students not able to access the curriculum fully in Year 8 will continue to receive warp around support both through withdrawal support and in-lesson support.
Manchester Communication Academy
September 2015
Catch Up Premium Report Year 7â&#x20AC;&#x201D;End of year 2015 Maths
Manchester Communication Academy
September 2015
Maths Cohort—Catch up premium (CUP) 40 students were less than level 4 on entry to year 7 in Maths. This accounts for 19.51 % of the whole year cohort. 80.48% are level 4 or above. Context of group
Key Points:
< Level 4 = 53 Students NUM %
Full Time
Boys Girls WBRI OTHER PP NPP eal
17 23 16 24 36 4 14
42.5 57.5 40 60 90 10 35
Whole School - 205 NUM % Maths 101 49.26 104 50.73 89 43.41 116 56.58 153 74.63 52 25.36 61 29.75
There are 7% fewer girls in the maths CUP cohort than in the whole year.
There are 15% more pupil premium students in the maths CUP cohort than in the whole year group.
The starting points for the whole year group is: 2B 1
2A 4
3C 19
3B 15
3A 1
KS2 - Entry 4C 92
4B 12
4A 1
5C 50
5B 2
6C 8
Below level 4 at the end of year 7 29 students achieved at least a level 4 at the end of the year 11 students were not achieving a level 4 at the end of the year. A breakdown of their grades were: Summer 2 - Current level 3C KS2 Start
2B 2A 3C 3B Grand Total
1
3B 1 1 1
1
3
Key Making better than expected progress Making expected progress Intervention
Of the students who were below a level 4 at the end of the year 7, 72.72% have made expected progress or better, whilst 18.18% of those students had made better than expected progress.
3A
Grand Total 1 2 7 1 11
1 5 1 7
Progress: Based on two sub levels per Progress Better than expected Expected Intervention
2
18.18
6 3
54.54 27.27
Manchester Communication Academy
September 2015
Maths Cohortâ&#x20AC;&#x201D;Catch up premium (CUP) Progressed above a level 4 at the end of year 7 At the end of the year 29 students had moved above a level 4. A breakdown of their grades were: 4C 1 9 5 1 16
2A 3C 3B 3A Grand Total
KS2 Start
4B
Summer 2 - Current level 4A
3 6
3
9
3
Of the students who had moved above a level 4 at the end of the year 7, 96.55 % have made expected progress or better, whilst 79.31% of those students had made better than expected progress.
5C 1
1
Grand Total 2 12 14 1 29
Progress 23 Better than expected Expected 5 1 Intervention
79.31 17.24 3.44
Overview of progress made by the students who were below a level 4 at the start of the year. Of the original 40 students who started year 7 below a level 4, a breakdown of their grades at the end of Summer 2 - Current level
3C
KS2 Start
2B 2A 3C 3B 3A Grand Total
1
1
3B 1 1 1
3
3A
4C
1 5 1
1 9 5 1 16
7
Of the students who were less than a level 4 at the start of year 7, 87.50 % have made expected progress, whilst 60% of those students had made better than expected progress.
4B
4A
5C 1
3 6
3
9
3
1
Progress of all CUP cohort 24 60 Better than expected 11 27.5 Expected Intervention 5 12.5
The progress of this cohort compares well to the whole year group were 84.39% made expected progress and 53.02% have made better than expected Progress < level 4 Better than expected Expected Intervention
NUM 24 11 5
% 60 27.5 12.5
Gran d 1 4 19 15 1 40
Whole year group NUM % 114 53.02 59 27.44 42 19.53
Manchester Communication Academy
September 2015
Year 7â&#x20AC;&#x201D;Mid term admissions Mid term admissions During Year 7, 10 students entered the Academy as mid term admissions or INA who were below level 4.
Mid Term
Contextual - 10 NUM Boys 7 3 Girls WBRI 0 10 OTHER PP NPP Mid term INA < level 4 >= level 4
% 70 30 0 100
1
10
9 4 6 7 3
90 40 60 70 30
At the end of the year, 5 students had progress to level 4 or above 3A 3C 3B 3A 4C 4B 5C Grand Total
4C 1
4A
5C
2 1
5B 1
1
1
1
1 2
3
1
3
1 1
Grand Total 4 1 2 1 1 1 10
Progress Better than expected Expected Intervention
5 3 2
50 30 20
Typically, these students were international new arrivals, not eligible for pupil premium . Provision for students not able to access the curriculum fully in Year 8 will continue to receive warp around support both through withdrawal support and in-lesson support.