Invasive Species

Page 1

Timothy E. Fulbright


 Replace native plant

communities  Semi-monocultures  Persist indefinitely


 >185 introduced  African grasses

• Bermudagrass, buffelgrass, guineagrass,

Kleingrass, Lehmann lovegrass  Old World Bluestems

• Angleton, Australian, Caucasian, Kleberg’s,

Yellow (King Ranch), others


 Reasons for invasion

• Must understand before

we can manage • May be complex  Ecosystem impacts  Management

implications


 Proximity to seed source  Seed dissemination  Soils  Disturbance  Climate change


 Closer to source, more likely invasion

• Roadsides  As surrounding area

with invasives increases, probability of invasion increases

Probability of invasion

• Planted pastures

Area planted (%)


 Highways are point source  TEXDOT replacing with natives


 Seed dissemination along roads  Animal vectors

• Lehmann lovegrass seeds in cattle rumens • Buffelgrass spikelets in fur • Guineagrass seeds in birds


 Certain soils less prone to invasion

• Fine sands • Alkaline • Saline  Combination of optimal soil, climate,

dissemination • Unlikely to prevent • Increase exponential


 Fire  Soil disturbance  Energy development


 Fire & buffelgrass  Frequent, intense fires convert native to

buffelgrass  CWMA – natives 30% greater with fire


 Fire & guineagrass  Considered fire resistant  Can reduce guineagrass

• Hot fire reduced density 37% • Increased native richness 330%


 Fire does not cause Lehmann to spread  Grazing or drought - natives decline

• Lehmann then replaces natives • Factors allowing Lehmann to dominate  >H2O use efficiency than natives  >reproductive rate  Fire can reduce Lehmann

• Reduction may result in increased natives  Need better understanding of fire-

Lehmann relationships


 Fire & Old World bluestems  Conflicting information  Kansas – fires exacerbates Caucasian

bluestem  Texas • Fire reduced King Ranch bluestem • King ranch bluestem distribution unrelated to fire  Variability

• Timing • Soils


 Soil disturbance  Buffelgrass and discing 50 Control

Disced in 1990

Canopy Cover (%)

40

30

20

10

0 1990

1991

1992

1993 Year

1994

1995


 Energy development

 Introduce exotics into new areas  Petroleum and wind

• Roads & pipelines • Transmission lines • Seeds on  Vehicles  Mowers

 Point sources of

spread


 Climate change  Buffelgrass

• Mean minimum temperature 5 C (41 F) • Seedlings tolerate – 6 C (21 F)  Guineagrass

• Mean minimum temperature 12 C (54 F) • Killed at <-6 C (<22 F)


Yu et al. Mean of 21 stations


Yu et al. Mean of 21 stations


Yu et al. Mean of 21 stations


Mean rainfall (inches)

3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 1904-1931

1932-1959

1960-1969

1970-1981

1983-2009


 Tropical exotic grasses  Favored by increasing

• Mean minimum temperatures • Mean temperatures • Summer rainfall  Changes exacerbate invasion of native

prairie


 Exotic grasses reduce abundance

and diversity • Native grasses • Forbs

Native

Buffelgrass


 New Mexico:

breeding bird abundance and species richness > on native vs. Lehmann lovegrass  Kansas: species richness 30% > on native vs. old world bluestems


 Abundance reduced by half  Avoid >25%

buffelgrass cover  Buffelgrass reduces food • Seeds unimportant as food • Reduces forbs • Reduces arthropods


 Greater arthropod

diversity in native versus nonnative


 Invasive grasses alter

arthropod communities  Review of 39 studies • Herbivorous insects lower

in 62% • Generalist species may increase or decrease


 Kansas

• 4 times > biomass on native vs. old world

bluestem  South Texas

• Arthropod abundance 60 times > on native vs.

Lehmann lovegrass/buffelgrass


Long. 2005. MS Thesis, Texas A&M-Kingsville.


 Soil microbes and OWBs  Kill native soil microorganisms

 Inhibit germination of seeds of native plants


 May not be detrimental to biodiversity in

soils where marginally adapted  Thresholds in canopy cover of exotics below which they have little effect


 Generalizations difficult

• Spatial variation • Rainfall – timing, amount


 Restoration

• Diversity is key  Functional groups  Successional groups • Soil microbial communities  Scaling effects

• Restoration at larger scales • Small tracts – more difficult to prevent reinvasion

when surrounded by exotics


 Climate change and Clement’s ghost

• Lack of hard freezes • Precipitation cycles  Restoring “original” impossible

• Climate, landscape function different • Focus on functional  Wildlife habitat  Biodiversity • Use locally adapted seeds


 Tim Hixon and Hixon Ranch  Jack and Loris Welhausen Experimental

Station  South Texas Natives  Department of Defense  Houston Livestock Show and Rodeo  Houston Safari Club  South Texas Quail Coalition


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.