RESEARCH AWARD FEEDBACK FORM-EXTENSION OF EXISTING KNOWLEDGE
1
Name: Date: Submission Title: Author Name(s):
Write your comments and recommendations in paragraph format in the space provided below each question. Feel free to take as much space as needed to thoroughly answer the questions. Your writing should be detailed and specific relative to the criteria. Please also provide your individual scoring for each section. Upon completion, please email a copy of this form to shingo.assistant@usu.edu. You will be scoring the submission on the following items: 1. Content 2. Premise 3. Presentation At the end of your feedback, please give the submission your overall recommendation with a yes or no answer.
2
Feedback and Criteria
I. Content a. Does this submission provide an extension of existing knowledge and understanding of operational excellence? Please refer to the bulleted list below to help guide you when evaluating and providing feedback for the submission. This list should not limit you in finding examples, but should help to guide you in your comments.
Provides evidence of sustainable operational excellence and lean Describes operational excellence success with minimal investment Describes operational excellence with minimal bureaucratic obstacles to change Expands knowledge of effective operational excellence and lean approaches for improving work; does not merely address analysis Builds on and enhances original work Addresses effects of supportive and unsupportive conditions for operational excellence and lean implementation Presents edifying, actual case studies that (preferably) identify the organizations and people involved Provides a body of operational excellence work that offers new insight by, for example, articulating a multi-dimensional view of operational excellence and lean or draws on multiple perspectives of operational excellence and lean Please enter your response here
b. What is this submission’s potential for significant impact on the body of knowledge or the practice of operational excellence. Please refer to the bulleted list below when evaluating and providing feedback for the submission. This list should not limit you in finding examples, but should help to guide you in your comments.
RESEARCH AWARD FEEDBACK FORM-EXTENSION OF EXISTING KNOWLEDGE
3
Does the submission present old information in a more effective, innovative, or valuable way? Has widespread application Is relevant to practitioners Adds value to current body of operational excellence knowledge Provides useful and practical information Provides guidance for achieving sustainable performance improvements Is engaging and thought provoking and provides new motivational insights Please enter your response here
2. Premise a. Below is the author’s intended premise for the book. Has the author met this premise? Please refer to the bulleted list below when evaluating and providing feedback for the submission. This list should not limit you in finding examples, but should help to guide you in your comments.
Is the author’s intended premise important? Why? Does the author achieve the premise he/she intended? How?
Author’s Premise Enter premise here
4
Feedback and Criteria Please enter your response here
3. Presentation c. Please describe the presentation quality of this work. Refer to the bulleted list below when evaluating and providing feedback for the submission. This list should not limit you in finding examples, but should help to guide you in your comments.
Has clearly stated and realized objectives Uses an appropriate level (frequency and nature) of practical examples Is specific in terms of who, what, why, and how Is well referenced, grounded, and data-based Has a distinctive organization and style that will attract target audience Is visually appealing (especially if multi-media) Contains compelling, clear, precise, and error-free writing that avoids jargon Please enter your response here
RESEARCH AWARD FEEDBACK FORM-EXTENSION OF EXISTING KNOWLEDGE
Scoring Please score each section below.
Content
Put your score here
50
Premise
Put your score here
25
Put your score here Add Scores together
25
Submission executes premise stated by author
Presentation Total
100
Recommendation Do you recommend this submission receive the Shingo Research and Professional Publication Award from The Shingo Prize for Operational Excellence? Yes
No
5