RISING TO THE CHALLENGE Each year for the past 10 years, KIPP has published an annual Report Card to share how our schools are doing—individually, at a regional level, and across the KIPP network as a whole. The Report Card reflects our collective commitment to transparency and accountability. In addition to reporting our progress, the Report Card also provides a unique space to reflect on where we have been, where we are today, and the work ahead. In 2012, we continued to experience the impact of globalization as young Americans struggled to gain employment in an economy undergoing dramatic shifts. In the midst of these shifts, the gap in the employment rate between college graduates and non-college graduates continued to widen. What is more clear than ever is that the future of our country—and all of us who enjoy the incredible freedoms that come with it—depends upon our collective commitment to providing all children with access to a great education. And, while we need this to happen for every child, there is a level of urgency when we consider the challenges faced by the one in five children living in poverty in America. In the greatest country on earth, we live with the reality that a child in a more affluent community is seven times more likely to graduate from college than a child growing up in poverty. While recognizing the challenges we face, we remain optimistic. When Mike Feinberg and Dave Levin founded KIPP, there were few examples of schools serving lowincome students with success. That picture has changed. Today, there are hundreds of transformational schools operating in underserved communities across the country. This growth has, in large part, been achieved by building the talent pipeline
necessary to fuel these efforts. In more than a few cities, the odds are increasing that a child will wake up in the morning and head off to a school that will prepare him or her for this incredibly competitive world. In a number of communities, from Houston to Newark, and from New Orleans to Washington, D.C., the results of nearly two decades of hard work are evident. In this year’s Report Card, we step back to ask: What will it take to build systems of highperforming schools that prepare all students for success in college and in life? In doing so, we hope to move the conversation beyond what it takes to create one great school to how to tackle the challenge of building entire systems of great schools. We share our thoughts on this with great humility, as our beliefs on what it takes to build a great system of schools will continue to evolve, informed by the experience of our KIPPsters and by the shifts in the world taking place all around us today. This year, the KIPP network grew to include 125 schools in 20 states and the District of Columbia that collectively serve more than 41,000 students. As we open each new school and are joined by others who are innovating and continuously learning, we are optimistic that together we can rise to the challenge of overcoming educational inequity and create a better tomorrow for all children.
John Fisher
Richard Barth
Chairman of the Board KIPP Foundation
Chief Executive Officer KIPP Foundation
The people I love the best jump into work head first without dallying in the shallows and swim off with sure strokes almost out of sight. . . . who strain in the mud and the muck to move things forward, who do what has to be done, again and again.
— borrowed with gratitude from “to be of use,� a poem by marge piercy
table of contents
our approach 6 a belief in all students 7 college graduation as the goal 9 academics and character 13 visionary leaders 17 excellent teachers 21 striking the balance 25 a culture of continuous learning 27 on the horizon
31
national results local results
35 40
cities with multiple kipp schools atlanta, ga 41 austin, tx 43 baltimore, md 45 chicago, il 47 denver, co 49 gaston, nc 51 helena and blytheville, ar 53 houston, tx 55 jacksonville, fl 59 los angeles, ca 61 lynn and boston, ma 63 memphis, tn 65 new orleans, la 67 new york city, ny 69 newark, nj 71 philadelphia, pa 73 san antonio, tx 75 san francisco bay area, ca 77 washington, dc 79
cities with one kipp school
albany, ny 81 charlotte, nc 82 columbus, oh 83 dallas, tx 84 indianapolis, in 85 kansas city, mo 86 minneapolis, mn 87 nashville, tn 88 oklahoma city, ok 89 san diego, ca 90 st. louis, mo 91 tulsa, ok 92
appendix
93
detailed school results available at www.kipp.org/reportcard
what does it take to build a system of high-performing schools ? When Mike Feinberg and Dave Levin set out to start KIPP, they wrestled with the question, “What will it take to build a highperforming school that serves all students with excellence?” Their answers—empowered leaders, a culture of high expectations and a focus on results, choice and commitment, and more time in school to offer rich academics, character development, as well as extracurricular opportunities— became known as the Five Pillars. These operating principles guide
all KIPP schools, and increasingly have been adopted by others seeking to build schools where all students achieve. Nearly two decades later, KIPP has grown to include 125 schools, and in the next four years that number will increase to nearly 200 schools. As we have grown, we have continued to grapple with tough questions. Today, our questions have moved beyond what it takes to build just one or two great schools. Instead, we are asking:
What will it take to build a system of high-performing schools that prepare all students for success in college and in life? While we are still learning and do not have all of the answers, we have come to believe that, just like individual schools, systems of high-performing schools share a set of common elements that, when implemented together, create an environment where all students can succeed.
our approach a belief in all students Our work at KIPP is built on the most basic of beliefs: that all students will learn and achieve.
college graduation as the goal Grounded in this belief, teachers, leaders, and staff at KIPP are united around a shared end goal: to prepare KIPP students to succeed in college and lead choice-filled lives.
academics and character In order to truly prepare students for college, we must create classrooms and schools that not only deliver rigorous academics but also help students develop their character.
visionary leaders Outstanding schools—those that offer rigorous academics and character development—are built, led, and sustained by empowered leaders.
excellent teachers Supported by a great leader, it is the teacher in the classroom who helps students develop the character, knowledge, habits of mind, and skills needed to be successful in college and the competitive world.
striking the balance The path to success starts with a fundamental conviction that empowered leaders and teachers are best positioned to make the decisions that impact students. This belief is balanced with the idea that leveraging the knowledge and resources of a broader system also helps everyone succeed.
a culture of continuous learning In an environment where leaders and teachers are empowered to make decisions, a culture of innovation is fostered. By measuring what matters and having a mind-set of continuous learning, those innovations having the greatest impact on students can be surfaced and widely disseminated for the benefit of all.
rising to the challenge
6
a belief in all students
family affair
Galessa, valedictorian of KIPP Delta Collegiate’s class of 2012, is a freshman at Vanderbilt. Back in Helena, a small rural town in the Arkansas Delta, she left big shoes for her brothers to fill. All of her brothers are enrolled in the KIPP elementary, middle, and high schools in the Delta. And they are all climbing the mountain to and through college.
kipp works because we all have the same belief: that all students can and will learn. — mitch brenner, kipp teacher
what does it take for all children to learn and achieve ? Since our founding, it has been our core belief that all students, regardless of their zip code or demographics, will learn and achieve. We are committed to serving the students who need us most and refuse to accept anything less than an excellent collegepreparatory education for students from low-income communities. This year, KIPP grew to serve more than 41,000 students in grades PreK–12. Nationally, 86 percent of KIPP students qualify for free or reduced price meals and 95 percent are African American or Latino. At our current rate of growth, we expect to serve more than 60,000 children by the fall of 2015. Beyond growing the number of students we serve, we are committed to making sure that students who join KIPP stay with us year after year. Just as we track and analyze our student achievement outcomes, we also closely study our student attrition rates. We consider student
attrition to be a key factor in understanding a school’s overall health. Put simply, a school with excellent test scores but high student attrition is not realizing our mission. In 2011–12, 88 percent of KIPP students returned to their KIPP school or completed the highest grade offered at their school. While many aspects of KIPP have remained constant, we have evolved and changed as well. Originally, KIPP only served students in middle school. In 2004, we opened our first KIPP elementary school and our first KIPP high school in Houston, TX. The decision to expand to a PreK–12 model grew out of a desire to keep students with us longer. We began asking, “What if students came to us when they were 3, 4, or 5 instead of 10 or 11? Maybe we could start them out on an entirely different academic trajectory?” By enrolling students as young as 3, 4, and 5, we could provide them with the foundation needed
to successfully launch into middle school. By staying with students through their high school years, we could better ensure that students sustained results and continued on a trajectory to, and eventually through, college. Today, our network includes 37 elementary schools, 70 middle schools, and 18 high schools. As we grow these schools and open additional schools, we build on our foundational belief that all students will learn.
41,000+ kipp students nationwide
95%
are african american or latino
86%
are eligible for free or reduced price meals
96%
of kipp classes outperformed their local districts on state tests in reading. 92% did so in math.
rising to the challenge
8
college graduation as the goal
living proof
Lorenzo Castillo is a teacher at KIPP New Orleans, but before that, he was a KIPP student himself in Houston. In fact, he’s one of more than 100 KIPP alumni who now work for KIPP, helping the next generation of students climb the mountain all the way to graduation day.
what does it take to ensure more students from low-income communities graduate from college ? Essential to creating a great system of schools is having our eyes on the same goal: college graduation. At KIPP, teachers, leaders, students, and parents are all united around this goal. While we know that not every student will choose to attend a four-year college, the skills necessary to get into and succeed in college
are essential to creating greater opportunity and self-sufficiency. Far too many smart, hard-working students from low-income backgrounds are not being prepared for college, and those who are attending are not graduating at the rates of higher-income peers. While making it to college is an important step, our goal is to
equip our students with the skills needed to graduate from college. To meet this goal, our schools are focused on ensuring that all students are taking rigorous, college-preparatory courses. As a complement to the education students undertake in the classroom, in 1998 we created a program
called KIPP To College (KTC) in order to stay connected to students once they leave KIPP. In recent years, we changed the name to KIPP Through College to reflect our increased emphasis on college completion. Through KTC, our schools and regions deliver day-to-day, on-theground advising and support to KIPP students and their families, from middle school all the way through college graduation. A local KTC program may include: high school and college placement guidance, academic support (connecting students with tutoring, summer enrichment, and test preparation), individualized financial aid counseling, student and family counseling to address social and emotional needs, and career services. KTC counselors support students
as they navigate high school and prepare for college entry. They help students identify a college that is the best match for them, and they stay connected as students work hard on their journey through college. Two years ago, in an effort to demonstrate how our KIPP alumni were faring after they left our schools, we published The Promise of College Completion: KIPP’s Early Successes and Challenges. This report detailed the college completion rates from the first two KIPP middle schools (which have been open long enough for their early classes of students to have graduated from college) and offered a clearer picture of the challenges students from low-income communities face on the
path to a degree, as well as the factors that help them succeed. Beyond rigorous academic preparation and character education, students need help finding a college that best matches their needs, formal and informal supports to integrate socially and academically once on campus, and financial resources. Our latest results show that 83 percent of students who completed eighth grade at KIPP go on to college. KIPP alumni are graduating college at rates that exceed national averages and are approximately four times the rates of their lowincome peers. This year we can report that 40 percent of KIPP alumni (from the original two KIPP schools) who completed the 8th grade at a KIPP middle school 10 or
more years ago have earned a bachelor’s degree, and nearly an additional five percent have earned an associate’s degree. In the coming years, as the number of KIPP alumni in college increases, we anticipate that these numbers could fluctuate. We see this as a tremendous opportunity to learn and to move closer to our goal of closing the college completion gap between our students and their highestincome peers. As we continue to refine our strategies, we humbly seek the partnership of others who share our belief that all students, regardless of circumstance, deserve the opportunity to make it to and through college.
striving toward completion 100 93 72
90
83 45
63 40
33 10
% of students who graduate from high school kipp average
% of students who start college
low-income average
% of students who complete four-year college u.s. average
rising to the challenge
10
— jennefer, kipp alumna
collaborating with higher education i was nervous about being so far away from family, but i have had an amazing support network through my fellow kippsters and the franklin & marshall community. — brianna, kipp alumna
In the past two years we have created unique partnerships with more than 25 colleges and universities nationwide. Our College Partnerships Initiative aims to identify higher education institutions committed to serving KIPP alumni and students from similar backgrounds, and to strengthen the supports these campuses offer to ensure that first-generation students are persisting and earning degrees at the highest rates possible. In the years ahead, along with our college partners, we look forward to learning together more about what it takes for underserved students to persist through college and earn a college degree. One of our earliest college partners, Franklin & Marshall (F&M), is developing innovative strategies to support prospective applicants as well as to help new students acclimate and thrive once on campus. During the summer of 2012, thirty rising KIPP seniors from across the country attended the F&M College Prep program. For three weeks, KIPP students lived on campus in residence halls, took classes with F&M professors, and immersed themselves in college life. In the fall, eight KIPP alumni enrolled at F&M.
college preparation at every stage Building college awareness through class lessons, school culture, and vocabulary.
elementary
High school transition support and assistance applying to summer programs.
middle Awareness of SAT/ACTs, financial aid, majors, and the application process. College campus visits and guest speaker events.
College-prep education with AP and advanced curriculum.
high Financial literacy, SAT/ACT support, and support with college applications.
One-on-one support once in college: mentorship, academic supports, financial aid advising, and counseling.
college Thoughtful counseling to ensure the right college match for each student. Celebration of college acceptances as community milestones. Continued support of those who pursue other post-high school options.
Career awareness, internship application support, and resume building. Ensuring high expectations and college success through graduation day.
rising to the challenge
12
academics and character
beyond expectations
For first and second grade science teacher Ashley Soellner, developing curiosity is just as important as teaching the basics of life science. And as the after-school ballet club coordinator, she is critical to a well-rounded educational experience for the students of KIPP Baltimore.
i love when the light comes on and a child thinks, “i can do this.” — jennifer, kipp parent and staff member
what does it take to create classrooms and schools that offer rigorous academic preparation and character development ? Since KIPP’s beginning, the development of character has been as important as the teaching of rigorous academics. We believe both are critical to the success of our students. A rigorous education is one that prepares students for the demands of college. Quite simply, rigor means teaching with the end in mind. With a clear understanding of what our students must know and be able to do in college, we must plan backwards from high school all the way down to kindergarten in order to ensure that students are acquiring the knowledge and skills they will need at every grade level. To support students in acquiring the academic knowledge and skills to be college-ready, our teachers set ambitious, measurable, yearlong goals for student growth and achievement. They plan how they will achieve these goals by segmenting work into manageable and measurable units. Throughout the year, teachers regularly track and communicate student progress and use data to drive shortand long-term planning and to determine when re-teaching is necessary.
KIPP New Orleans teacher Jamie Irish sets a high bar for his eighth-grade math students. At the start of the year, Irish issues a call to action challenging his students to establish high goals for themselves individually and as a class. To track progress, Irish provides students with consistent, actionable feedback and remediation daily. With a clear goal from day one, Irish says, “Students start believing that they can change the trajectory of their lives in my class.” Just like Irish, KIPP Academy Lynn Collegiate teacher Shauna Mulligan is working to ensure rigorous instruction in her high school English classes. Mulligan believes that students studying the humanities should be able to use evidence to arrive at correct interpretations. According to Mulligan, “Really hard thinking and figuring things out is fun, and asking students to be exact makes them think really hard.” To drive rigor in English, Mulligan plans in advance how she expects students to answer questions and listens with an evaluative ear to confirm that students are reading and thinking carefully, accurately, and at a high level.
In 2011–12, 96 percent of KIPP classes outperformed their local districts on state tests in reading and 92 percent did so in math. In addition, on a nationally norm-referenced test, KIPP students, on average, are outperforming their peers on achieving one or more years of growth. Ultimately, academic rigor is rooted in the belief that all students will learn and achieve. We believe that when a student is struggling academically, it is our responsibility to reteach in order to give that student another opportunity at mastery. We work to understand the learning styles and academic strengths and areas of growth of individual students. We vary our teaching strategies to ensure that all students can access content. And we consistently communicate that through hard work, students can accomplish their goals.
In its longitudinal study of KIPP middle schools, Mathematica found that KIPP’s impact is “positive, statistically significant, and educationally substantial.” Further, KIPP’s impact is consistently positive across the four academic subjects examined—in each of the first four years after enrollment in a KIPP school and for all measurable student subgroups—including Special Education students and English Language Learners.
rising to the challenge
14
here at kipp, i am challenged. but i like it. — rosemary, kipp student
character and academic preparation are critical for success in college and in life. In addition to the teaching of rigorous academic skills, we are intentional about explicitly creating opportunities for students to develop their character. As our earliest classes of KIPP students graduated high school, we began to see that academic success alone did not always predict success in college. Strength of character also plays an important role. While the idea of fostering a student’s character development has been core to KIPP from the beginning, KIPP schools around the country are now focused on how to integrate a more structured and measurable approach to character development.
when i grow up, i want to be the kind of person who doesn’t back down. a person with integrity. a person who has a lot of hope. — atolani, kipp student describing her character goals
Rooted in the research of Dr. Martin Seligman (University of Pennsylvania) and Dr. Chris Peterson (University of Michigan), and building off the pioneering work of Dr. Angela Duckworth (University of Pennsylvania) and our schools in New York, KIPP is now especially focused on helping students cultivate seven strengths predictive of life success: zest, grit, selfcontrol, optimism, gratitude, social intelligence, and curiosity. We share more about our character work on our website and offer suggestions about how schools, classrooms, and lessons can be infused with opportunities to develop these character strengths. Writer and journalist Paul Tough describes KIPP’s approach to character in his book How Children Succeed and argues that character may have more to do with student success than simply IQ. Moreover, Tough writes that character can be developed and describes how this knowledge can help all students overcome obstacles and succeed in life. At KIPP, we are committed to helping our students incorporate the seven character strengths into their daily thoughts and actions both inside and outside the classroom.
rising to the challenge
16
visionary leaders
community roots
Crystal grew up in South Memphis. She is one of the first college graduates in her extended family of over 50. When she studied the civil rights movement in-depth in college, she was inspired to open a school for the children of her hometown. That dream school of hers will finally come true next summer—the first KIPP school on the south side of Memphis.
what does it take to empower leaders to have a lasting impact ? KIPP was built on the idea that great leaders create great schools, and that a great school can change the trajectory of a child’s life. We believe that schools are the units of change and principals are the leaders of that change. It is the empowered and wellprepared school leader who attracts talented teachers, fosters their growth and development, and creates a culture of excellence for all. In 2000, when Doris and Donald Fisher partnered with Mike and Dave to create the KIPP Foundation, they established the Fisher Fellowship to begin to train leaders to replicate the success of the original KIPP middle schools. Today, the Fisher Fellowship continues to prepare individuals for the school leader role with intensive training, coaching, and mentoring. In addition, Fisher Fellows participate in
residencies at KIPP schools and Our national leadership development programs other high-performing schools complement the formal during their fellowship year. coaching, mentoring, 360-degree feedback, and Beyond the Fisher Fellowship, we offer nationally coordinated ongoing guidance offered by our local schools and regions. leadership development KIPP regions regularly bring opportunities to emerging together individuals who share leaders in our schools. We know that to open new schools similar roles for skill-building workshops. In addition, our and sustain quality in our school leaders look to develop existing schools, we will need the emerging leaders in their a deep pipeline of leaders including new school founders, own schools by creating learning opportunities and successor school leaders, professional development assistant principals, deans, and grade level chairs. Through experiences for rising leaders who have an interest in school the KIPP School Leadership leadership. For example, a Programs (KSLP), we have teacher aspiring to school trained over 1,000 educators, many of whom will assume the leadership might be asked reins of an existing KIPP school to run Saturday school, coordinate parent group or found a new one in the years ahead. Further, each year meetings, or represent the school at a city function. In other high-performing charter doing so, rising leaders gain schools and school districts valuable exposure to the role from across the country send of a school leader. participants to KIPP to be trained by KSLP.
sharing our practices In 2012, we launched the KIPP Leadership Design Fellowship (KLDF) to introduce public school administrators from districts and charter schools to KIPP’s leadership development practices. With support from our Investing in Innovation (i3) grant from the U.S. Department of Education and matching grant partners, this eight-month cohort-based program has allowed KIPP to open its doors to leaders from 55 public school districts and charter school systems, as well as leadership training organizations, and offer them an in-depth look at KIPP’s principal recruitment, training, and development practices. Across multiple summits and in-school residencies, this program has fostered a collaborative learning experience for all participants.
rising to the challenge
18
building capacity
For Amber Young Medina, being a great mom and wife is as important as leading a great school. That means setting clear boundaries in her life so that she can be present with her students and staff, as well as with her own family. Building a strong leadership team is essential to the success of the school. She coaches her staff to be effective leaders themselves, keeping in mind their individual goals and skill sets. Empowering her staff is critical to KIPP RaĂces Academy’s success as an enduring institution for generations of students to come.
increasing school leader success and sustainability Our data shows us that school leader longevity is correlated with several positive outcomes, including lower student attrition and greater student achievement gains. Since the job of leading a school is not easy, we have grappled with the question: “Is there a set of behaviors that characterize great school leaders and make the job of leading a transformative school sustainable over the long-haul?” In partnership with David Maxfield from Vital Smarts, a team of remarkable leaders from across KIPP conducted an extensive research project to identify four behaviors that are vital to increasing school leader success and sustainability. Known as the “KIPP Vital Behaviors for Success and Sustainability,” these four behaviors are:
1) teach and insist. Teach more people to do the work that needs to be done . . . and insist that they do it. Great school leaders build and empower a leadership team to make decisions and implement them, give real responsibilities to emerging leaders, hold people accountable for agreed-upon outcomes, and embrace mistakes as an opportunity to teach and build capacity.
2) prioritize and execute. Plan and execute (like a lesson). Effective school leaders clearly identify short- and long-term goals for all team members and the school as a whole. They clearly identify the most important priorities to realize long-term goals, and prioritize both strategic and tactical tasks.
3) engage your lifelines. Use a lifeline. Be a lifeline. Great school leaders reach out to peers that can honor, encourage, and push them, and in turn, do the same for others.
4) renew to get stronger. Build in time for physical recovery and mental and emotional renewal. The job of a school leader is hard and demanding. It is vital to create a school culture that integrates and celebrates deliberate and ongoing recovery and renewal for the entire school community.
rising to the challenge
20
excellent teachers
real learning
In Lakeda Ward’s third grade science and math class, students eagerly gather to perform an experiment. “I don’t want them just to work the problem,” she says. “I want them to understand how and why a problem is solved.”
what does it take to attract and retain great teachers in every classroom ? Recruiting and retaining highquality teachers is critical to the long-term success and sustainability of our schools. When we ask our alumni to reflect on their time at KIPP and share one thing that made the difference in their success, their response is overwhelmingly “my KIPP teachers.” We know, and have experienced what research confirms, that teachers are the single most important inschool factor contributing to student achievement. While teaching is extremely rewarding, it is also extremely challenging. Teachers working in underserved communities often face additional challenges. Catching up students who are one and sometimes two grade levels behind academically takes remarkable commitment and focus. Working longer days, being available to students after hours, and creating classrooms filled with the joy of learning requires dedication and persistence. We aim to recruit skilled teachers from diverse personal and professional backgrounds who have a passion and commitment to our mission. Whether they want to grow into a leadership
role within their school or master their profession as a teacher, we find a place for great talent at KIPP and strive to keep people with us year after year. In the 2011–12 school year, 74 percent of our teachers from the previous year stayed with KIPP, and we are committed to seeing that number increase. To keep teachers with us, we invest in their growth, recognizing that teaching is a craft and that teachers deserve regular opportunities to hone and refine their skills. We strive to foster an environment that encourages collaboration among colleagues and regularly celebrates success. In addition, teachers at KIPP have the freedom and autonomy to innovate creatively in the classroom and make decisions about what is best for their students. Within their school building, teachers at KIPP have the opportunity to participate in regular, on-site professional development that enables them to connect with colleagues, share resources, deepen their knowledge, and solve for shared problems. Beyond coordinated professional development,
one of the most powerful supports teachers at KIPP receive is ongoing instructional coaching and mentoring. In Austin, TX, for example, instructional coach Melissa Scheinfeld works side by side with her school leader to help guide each teacher in designing and delivering highquality curricula that will help prepare students for success in college. In cities where KIPP has multiple schools, teachers often have opportunities to collaborate with and learn from other local KIPP teachers who teach the same grade level or subject. Many teachers form cross-school working groups and develop processes to share resources and practices that maximize learning. In addition, many KIPP teachers collaborate across cities. Steve Frederick, a teacher in Denver, CO, is partnering with Susan Oba in San Jose, CA. Together, the two are redesigning Steve’s sixth-grade math curriculum and plan to share all that they develop so that other KIPP teachers may build on their lessons and strategies.
2,800+ kipp teachers nationwide
74%
of teachers returned last year
68%
returned to their position
6%
moved into a non-teaching position at kipp or now teach at another kipp school
rising to the challenge
22
professional development and online tools fuel sharing and innovation We believe that great instruction results from innovation and collaboration. When something works, we celebrate it and share it broadly. To enable our teachers and leaders to benefit from the collective knowledge and learning occurring across KIPP, the KIPP Foundation invests in creating frameworks and tools that provide a common language and facilitate the exchange of effective practice. Two years ago, we saw a need to create a network-wide, shared language for describing what great teaching looks like at KIPP. We created the KIPP Framework for Excellent Teaching (KFET), and today leaders are beginning to use this framework to develop tools to coach and support teachers as they grow in their practice. KIPP teachers also have access to KIPP Share, a national online platform that enables teachers—some of whom are separated by thousands of miles—to connect with each other and share ideas, curriculum, and resources. To date, nearly half a million resources and tools have been shared on KIPP Share. Teachers have the opportunity to attend nationally coordinated, subject-specific retreats and professional development gatherings throughout the year, the largest of which is the annual KIPP School Summit (KSS). In 2012, more than 3,000 KIPP teachers, leaders, and support staff participated in KSS. During this week of professional development, our Team and Family have the opportunity to learn, share, connect, and renew in preparation for the coming academic year. At KSS, our focus is on one thing: getting even better at delivering on the promises we make to our students so that each and every KIPP student is prepared to climb the mountain to and through college.
kss is a once-in-alifetime, amazing, energizing experience. — kipp school summit attendee survey response
sharing best practices
Brett Noble teaches 11th grade English in Gaston, NC, and he has uploaded his entire curriculum to KIPP Share. With all of his resources at their disposal, his colleagues across the country don’t have to start from scratch.
rising to the challenge
24
striking the balance striking the balance
focus
Sha Reagans co-leads the KIPP high school in Newark. As the principal, no one knows the needs of his students better than he does. But real estate and technology contracts? Those things he leaves up to his regional office. That way, he has the time to focus on what matters most, and what he knows best: the students in his school.
what does it take to empower leaders and leverage scale ? As our network has grown, we have continued to confront and revisit the question of which decisions are best made closest to students and whether there are cases in which our students are best served by centralizing or standardizing certain practices. As we think about empowering leaders and leveraging scale, we do not view this as an either-or choice between two alternatives. Rather, we believe that a large degree of school leader autonomy can be preserved
in a system of schools that makes selective investments in standardization, which enables the system to operate effectively and efficiently. In KIPP’s earliest years, we focused on recruiting and training outstanding educators who could replicate the success of the original two KIPP middle schools. After several years of supporting the creation of stand-alone schools in community after community, we came to believe that, although the school is the critical unit of
change, schools could derive many benefits from operating in geographic clusters: KIPP regions. Schools clustered in KIPP regions can share instructional practices and materials, thereby accelerating innovation in the classroom. In a KIPP region, the KIPP school leader can focus on students, teachers, and families while a central office provides services across multiple schools, such as human resources, recruiting, facilities management, technology, food service, procurement, and transportation, as well as alumni services. Since 2006, we have approached growth into new communities with an eye toward building not just one transformational school but an entire KIPP region—a local system of schools—and we are supporting the founding teams of our flagship school in each community to expand and become a KIPP region. Today, 95 percent of KIPP schools are part of a KIPP region. They are supported by a central office, governed by a common local board, and led by a local executive director.
our ability to leverage our national scale and accelerate innovation. For example, we have established networkwide shared understandings and definitions for describing the characteristics of great leadership (KIPP Leadership Competency Model), a framework outlining what great teachers do (KIPP Framework for Excellent Teaching), and a framework defining what makes a healthy KIPP school (Healthy Schools & Regions). These frameworks provide the foundation on which our leaders create tools and practices that they then share in order to learn from one another and drive results in their schools.
At KIPP, we believe decisions are most effectively made closest to the student. Yet, with schools in 20 states and the District of Columbia, we believe that national investments in common languages and common frameworks are central to
rising to the challenge
26
continuous learning
what does it take to build a data-driven culture and an organization committed to continuous learning ? transparency about attendance, behavior, and academic progress with our students and families ensures that we’re all on the same page. — joanna belcher, kipp school leader
We believe that data helps us understand our true impact, what is working, and what needs to be improved. We know that when our school and regional leaders and teachers are empowered to make decisions and have access to quality data, innovation can flourish. Further, they are better able to refine instruction and drive strategic planning, identify opportunities for learning, and share effective practices. And we believe that school health is measured by a much broader range of indicators than standardized test scores alone.
To bring to life our belief—that as educators we must all move beyond the singular focus on test scores and provide our schools and regions with a holistic view of their performance—we created the Healthy Schools & Regions (HSR) framework. Through HSR, we look at a set of academic and nonacademic indicators of school success including college attainment, student achievement, student attrition, teacher retention, and the number of teachers and other staff preparing to assume school leadership roles. We also survey students, parents, school leaders, teachers and staff to understand how a school’s culture, leadership, and instructional strategies are impacting results. We are committed to examining school health and the health of our network by exploring Six Essential Questions. Please see page 35 for an overview of our health in 2011–12.
healthy schools & regions
six essential questions question 1
are we serving the children who need us ? question 2
are our students staying with us ? question 3
are our students progressing and achieving academically ? question 4
are our alumni climbing the mountain to and through college ?
question 5
are we building a sustainable people model ?
question 6
are we building a sustainable financial model ?
rising to the challenge
28
empowered by data
Teachers at KIPP Empower Academy utilize innovative instructional technology in the classroom to enhance and personalize student learning. Throughout the day, teachers are able to work with small groups of students to offer differentiated, individualized instruction while other students engage in self-paced, online learning on classroom laptops. Moreover, teachers have access to richer, more real-time data allowing them to monitor student progress, target interventions, and plan more effectively.
constantly improving Our Healthy Schools & Regions work informs our decision-making and prioritization, helps us improve our understanding of promising practices throughout the KIPP network, and helps our teachers and leaders drive student outcomes. Through our HSR assessment data, teachers have access to high-quality data on student achievement and growth, and can differentiate instruction. School leaders can use data to prioritize emerging school needs and improve their own instructional leadership. KIPP regional leaders can gain a more holistic view of the health of their region and put in place strategies to address areas of growth. Nationally, HSR enables us to identify top performers so that we may learn from and disseminate effective practices.
Equally as important as measuring what matters is having a mind-set of continuous learning, an unrelenting drive to constantly improve, and mechanisms in place to share what is working. At KIPP, we aim to foster an organizational culture that believes: “When there are problems, we find solutions. When there is a better way, we find it. When a teammate needs help, we give. When we need help, we ask.” Common frameworks play a critical role in allowing us to leverage our scale in support of continuous learning, enabling KIPP teachers and leaders across the country to compare results and share effective practices. When great practitioners start with something that is already working and make it even better, innovation is accelerated. To that end, we are working toward providing
greater access to startingpoint resources for our teachers and leaders. Beyond creating tools for teachers to share curricula and resources online, we also launched a similar online collaboration tool for our noninstructional staff. And we have created national “communities of practice” for staff members who teach the same subject or share the same job functions. Guided by a master teacher or leader, members of communities of practice gain new insights into common challenges and share knowledge and materials through professional development retreats and school visits. Through measuring what matters and having a mind-set of continuous learning, we are committed to getting better, each year and each decade, so that we can best support our students in developing the character and academic skills for success in college, career, and life.
i would never tell my students that they’re perfect, and i feel the same way about me. we all have room for growth. i talk about that constantly in my classroom. — adrianne capaldi, kipp teacher
rising to the challenge
30
on the horizon striking the balance
what will it take to improve public education for all students ?
Over the past two decades, we have had the great honor of watching thousands of KIPP students grow and achieve at the highest levels, challenging beliefs about what is possible in public education. Along the way, so many others who share our commitment and work tirelessly on behalf of underserved students have joined this movement. Together, we are all rising to the challenge of eliminating educational inequity. Twenty years ago, there were few visible examples of classrooms in low-income communities that were changing the life trajectories of children. Today, there are entire schools that are putting students on track for success in college and the competitive world. And there is growing acknowledgement that it is possible to build and replicate schools that attain transformational results. The challenge now is to scale this success—to create dozens of systems of schools that are providing life-changing educational opportunities for America’s underserved students. At KIPP, we are committed to broadening our impact and sharing all that we have learned about designing and operating a network of high-performing schools. We aim to more intentionally disseminate our KIPP-developed frameworks and tools,
strive to create a dialogue around key issues like college completion and student mobility, and join with others to collectively advocate for the needs of underserved students. Even as we are optimistic today about progress made, much work remains. Our journey is far from complete and as we look to the future, many challenges loom large, and opportunities await. As a nation, we must continue to figure out how to close achievement gaps and prepare all students for success in college and the increasingly competitive world. And we must all collectively address emerging challenges and opportunities on the horizon.
For example, how will we, as a greater education community, leverage the higher learning standards of the Common Core to push all students toward college readiness? How will we continue to build the talent pool that the education sector needs? How will we ensure that talented and hard-working students who are undocumented have access to postsecondary opportunities? And how will we create pathways to success and self-sufficiency for students who are not college-bound?
As a network, these are just a few of the questions we are considering as we envision the work that lies ahead. We share these challenges and opportunities, humbly acknowledging that we do not have all of the answers. We invite students, parents, teachers, principals, higher education leaders, policymakers, philanthropists, and others to join with us as we collectively figure out how to rise to these challenges and improve education for all.
rising to the challenge
32
about the report card The annual KIPP Report Card is a direct reflection of our commitment to performance transparency and accountability for student results and achievement in our schools. We are determined to find out what’s working and not working for our students and families. The numbers tell a rich story. By analyzing our data, we can help sustain practices that make our schools thrive, while also understanding our challenges so that we can meet them head-on. The 2012 KIPP Report Card provides data that tracks the growth and performance of the KIPP network; this data was collected from each locally-run KIPP site open during the 2011–12 school year.
city profiles and aggregate results The printed version of the Report Card features the aggregated achievement and demographic data for each of our KIPP geographic sites. These profiles are ordered alphabetically by city within two sections: sites with multiple schools and sites with one school (some are considered KIPP regions and others are stand-alone schools). The information displayed in each profile includes the number of students served, grades served, student attrition, teacher retention, and achievement data. Profiles of KIPP sites with multiple schools also include a listing of all schools in that city. We collect achievement data from two sets of student tests: state criterion-referenced exams required of all public schools and nationally norm-referenced achievement exams administered to all KIPP students in grades two through eight (and in some cases, kindergarten and grade one). For state criterion-referenced exams, we hold ourselves accountable for raising student achievement beyond the proficient level; as such, we report the percentage of students who are not just proficient, but advanced. KIPP schools administer norm-referenced exams in order to have a common measurement of student achievement and growth across all states and to identify strengths and areas for improvement across KIPP schools.
school profiles and results Achievement and demographic results from all 109 KIPP schools open in the 2011–12 school year can be found at www.kipp.org /reportcard. The information on each of these profile pages includes student enrollment and demographics, student attrition data, number of teachers, per-pupil revenues, and achievement data. Note: Demographic data is accurate as of November 2012 (2012–13 school year) while achievement data, student attrition, and teacher retention reflect the 2011–12 school year. Values on all graphs are rounded to the nearest whole number. Percentages for student demographics and norm-referenced tests may not add up to 100 due to rounding. Values less than 11% may not be labeled due to space constraints.
helena & blytheville, ar kipp delta public schools ¡ est. 2002
78 number of
1,169
students enrolled
PreK-12 70% grades
teachers (fte)
teachers retained within kipp
served
41 5 oh io st re et, he le na , ar 72 34 2 • 87 0.75 3. 90
scott shirey
(57% retained in their position)
k ip p h ig h sc h o o l a p and act r es u lt s
executive director
21
av er ag e
86%
6%
16%
eligible for free/reduced price meals
94%
receiving special education services
annual student attrition rate
1% Latino 0% Other 4% Caucasian 1% Asian
African American
sc ho ol 92% grhi gh ad ua ti on
literacy
% of Students
% proficient + Advanced
75%
82
75
mathematics
85
66
85 69
66
81
80
78
75
67
90
80 68
64
90
87 67
65
47
50%
76 44
34
77
75
66
60 62
61
44
40
ki pp de lt a li te ra cy ac
25% 0%
3rd
5th
6th
7th
8th
kipp advanced kipp proficient
3rd
11th
5th
district advanced district proficient
6th
7th
8th
End-of-Course E OC
ad em y
amanda joh nson grades: pr ek-4 est. 2009
state advanced state proficient
2011-12 measures of academic progress (map)
% of Students by Quartile
reading
39
33
32 17
32
fall k
spring k
41%
to ok at le as t on e ap
(those wh
o have comp
co ll eg e m at ri cu la
leted 8th
sc or ed 3 or ab ov e on at le as t on e ap
grade at kip
p 5+ years
ago)
ti on
ki pp bl he vi ll e co ll eg eytpr ep ar at or y maisie wrigh t grades: 47 est. 2010
ki pp de lt a co ll pr ep ar at or y eg e marcus ne lson grades: 5-8 est. 2002
ki pp de a co hi gh sclt ho ol ll eg ia te todd dixon grades: 912 est. 2006
mathematics 35
23
18
23
80%
s)
68%
79
68 51
t r a te s
ta .o rg
(for gradua ting senior
sc h o o ls
2012 AR Mathematics E xam
93
100%
to ok th e ac t
a lu m n i a tt a in m en
arkansas benchmark exam 100%
ac t
35 • w w w .k ip pd el
19
19
39
32
14
14
14
32
31
27
29
26
30
32
28
29
29
29
28
35
34
28
32
24 21
41
38
27
27
44
spring k
30
15 38
39
15
25
16
spring 3rd
12 39 38 spring spring spring 3rd 2nd 1st
top quartile
fall 5th
14 spring spring spring 6th spring 8th 5th 7th
third quartile
fall k
spring 1st
second quartile
spring 2nd
25
20
28
27
43
fall 5th
27
spring 5th
23
25
26
31
29
36
25
18
25
19
27
16
26 35
21
spring spring spring 8th 6th 7th
bottom quartile
54
We report demographic information about our students (race/ ethnicity, eligibility for free/reduced price meals, and those defined as having special needs) for each city. We report annual student attrition data for each city. At the city level, we aggregate the state and district comparison data for criterion-referenced tests. We also show results for normreferenced tests for grades two through eight. For high school seniors, we report both SAT/ACT and AP exam participation rates and scores as a measure of college readiness. At the city level, we report high school graduation and college matriculation rates for those sites that have college-age alumni. We report teacher retention data at the city level when there are two or more schools reporting. At the individual school level, we report per-pupil funding and facilities information, providing context for assessing financial health and sustainability. Please find this information online at www.kipp.org /reportcard.
rising to the challenge
34
national results question 1
are we serving the children who need us ?
41,000+ kipp students across the country race & ethnicity
86%
9%
are eligible for free or reduced price meals
receive special education services
15%
are designated as english language learners
Note: Some schools serve a much higher proportion of ELL students than others given the communities they serve.
question 2
are our students staying with us ?
88% of kipp students returned in 2012
(or completed the highest grade at their school)
question
3
are our students progressing and achieving academically ? Every state administers criterion-referenced tests in the spring in order to assess student academic achievement. Each state has a unique test. The results of these exams allow us to compare the performance of KIPP classes to that of their local districts and states, but do not allow us to compare to classes in different states.
by the end of 8th grade, 96% of kipp classes outperform their local districts in reading; 92% do so in math. reading 78
96
91
80
78
73
60
56
52 43
38 16
3rd grade
4th grade
5th grade
6th grade
mathematics 60
56
96
88
80 67
62
7th grade
8th grade
92 77
69
58 33
3rd grade
4th grade
5th grade
% of classes outperforming their:
6th grade
7th grade
local districts
8th grade
states
high school results advanced placement (ap) tests for graduating seniors from kipp high schools
100 100
100 79 72
68
ce
s
sc
ien
at ic em ma th
en
gl
ish
66
% of classes outperforming their:
71%
local districts
took one or more ap tests.
a score of 48% received 3 or higher on at
s st o c i a ud l i es
71
least one ap test.
states
36
question
3, CONTINUED
are our students progressing and achieving academically ? by the end of 8th grade, 55% of kipp students outperform their national peers in reading; 60% do so in math.
reading performance by quartile on norm-referenced tests 55%
fall/spring fall/spring kindergarten 1st grade
top quartile
fall/spring fall/spring 2nd grade 3rd grade
fall/spring 4th grade
3rd quartile
fall/spring fall/spring 5th grade 6th grade
2nd quartile
fall/spring fall/spring 7th grade 8th grade
bottom quartile
math performance by quartile on norm-referenced tests 60%
fall/spring fall/spring kindergarten 1st grade
top quartile
fall/spring fall/spring 2nd grade 3rd grade
fall/spring 4th grade
3rd quartile
fall/spring fall/spring 5th grade 6th grade
2nd quartile
fall/spring fall/spring 7th grade 8th grade
bottom quartile
In order to see movement from fall to spring, only students that tested in fall and spring are included. Not all KIPP schools test in grades K and 1. The number of schools represented for each grade are as follows: K (16); 1 (13); 2 (12); 3 (7); 4 (4); 5 (55); 6 (51); 7 (45); 8 (41). Please note that while 4th grade represents the final grade of elementary school in most KIPP schools, in 1 of the 4 schools reporting 4th grade data, 4th grade is the cohort of new-to-KIPP students at a middle school that serves grades 4-8. KIPP elementary results are separated from middle school results because the majority of KIPP middle school students did not attend a KIPP elementary school.
on average, kipp students are outperforming the national average of students achieving 1+ years of growth. percent of students meeting growth targets on norm-referenced tests
reading
mathematics
K
61
K
67
1
58
1
66
2
48
2
53
3
57
3
72
4
56
4
68
5
64
5
70
62
6
72
61
7
70
56
8
68
6 7 8
meeting or exceeding growth targets
not meeting growth targets
In order to ensure that our students are on track to being college- and career-ready, we look closely at achievement results beginning in kindergarten. KIPP schools use a variety of data sources and tools to understand student achievement and track student growth. These include classroom observations and tests, evaluations of students’ skills against state standards, and a nationally norm-referenced test called Measures of Academic Progress (MAP).
national average
in 2008, the majority of 5th graders entered kipp below grade level. as 8th graders in 2012, the majority of them exited above grade level. mathematics
top quartile 3rd quartile 2nd quartile bottom quartile
fall 5th grade
spring 8th grade
Norm-referenced tests (NRTs) compare a student’s score against the scores of a national group of students. We require all KIPP schools serving grades 2–8 to administer an NRT; most also administer the test in grades K and 1. Unlike state tests, these exams allow us to compare the performance of KIPPsters to their grade-level peers across state lines. We can also track student performance across time. At KIPP, students test on MAP in the fall and the spring. Each year after fall testing, MAP assigns all students a target growth goal that they are to meet or exceed by the spring.
percent of students on or above grade level
reading
note: nationally normreferenced tests and measures of academic progress (map)
About norms for MAP: The 2011 Report Card reflected NWEA’s 2008 norms, while this year’s Report Card reflects 2011 norms. Changes between the 2011 Report Card and the 2012 Report Card may be due to changes in norms rather than to changes in performance.
spring 8th grade fall 5th grade
2011–12 marks the 4th consecutive year that KIPP has administered MAP, allowing us to look at a cohort progression from 5th to 8th grade. The results above represent the same cohort of students from 16 pilot schools that tested in fall 5th grade in 2008 and spring 8th grade in 2012.
38
question
4
are our alumni climbing the mountain to and through college? kipp students graduate from college at four times the rate of the average student from a low-income community. 100
kipp average 93 72
90
low-income average
83 45
u.s. average
63 40
33
10
% of students who graduate from high school
% of students who start college
% of students who complete four-year college
KIPP tracks its rates of high school graduation, college matriculation, and college completion based on those students (alumni) who complete eighth grade at a KIPP middle school.
question 5
are we building a sustainable people model? 74% of kipp teachers returned last year.
68% returned to their position 6% moved into a non-teaching
position at kipp or now teach at another kipp school
question 6
are we building a sustainable financial model? We believe it is important that KIPP schools and regions monitor their financial health and assess their financial sustainability and we are currently revisiting the measures and approaches to do so.
local results
40
atlanta, ga
kipp metro atlanta · est. 2003
110
1,609 students
number of teachers (fte)
enrolled
77%
K, 5–10 grades served
david jernigan
(78% retained in their position)
executive director
5%
17%
eligible for free/reduced price meals
82% teachers retained within kipp
97%
receiving special education services
annual student attrition rate
2% Latino 1% Other 0% Caucasian 0% Asian
African American
2012 criterion referenced competency test english language arts
% of Students
% of Students
100% 75%
mathematics
2012 G A R eading/E nglis h Language Arts E xam 99 98 94 96 98 95 96 92 94 91 90 86 88 84 70
78 75
84
2012 G A Mathematics E xam 99 91 90 88 85 80 77 70 68
74
65 46
50% 25% 0%
5th
6th
7th
8th
kipp exceeds standard kipp meets standard
End–of–Course E OC
district exceeds standard district meets standard
map was not administered in the 2011–12 academic year by kipp metro atlanta.
5th
6th
7th
state exceeds standard state meets standard
8th
End–of–Course E OC
98 anderson avenue, nw, atlanta, ga 30314 • 404.924.6310 • www.kippmetroatlanta.org
kipp high school ap and act results
N/A
average act
N/A
N/A
took the act
alumni attainment rates high school 96% graduation
(for graduating seniors)
took at least one ap
N/A
scored 3 or above on at least one ap
(those who have completed 8th grade at kipp 5+ years ago)
86% college matriculation
schools kipp strive primary mini’imah shaheed grades: k est. 2012
kipp ways academy dwight ho–sang grades: 5–8 est. 2003
kipp south fulton academy jondré pryor grades: 5–8 est. 2003
kipp atlanta collegiate dave howland grades: 9–10 est. 2011
kipp strive academy ed chang grades: 5–8 est. 2009
kipp vision academy steven jones grades: 5–7 est. 2010
austin, tx
kipp austin public schools · est. 2002
K–2, 5–12 65% grades teachers retained within kipp
124 2,080 number of students
teachers (fte)
enrolled
served
86%
executive director
7%
9%
eligible for free/reduced price meals
steven epstein
(60% retained in their position)
91%
receiving special education services
annual student attrition rate
7% African American 0% Other 1% Caucasian 0% Asian
Latino
2012 state of texas assessments of academic readiness reading
% of Students
% of Students
100% 75%
mathematics
2012 T X R eading/E nglish Language Arts E xam 95 84 78 77 77 76 80 73 70 74 72 76 69 68 67
2012 T X Mathematics E xam 97 93 93 79 81 78
77 77
69 71
69
7th
8th
88 87
50% 25% 0%
5th
6th
7th
8th
kipp level iii: advanced kipp level ii: satisfactory
End–of–Course E OC
5th
district level iii: advanced district level ii: satisfactory
6th
state level iii: advanced state level ii: satisfactory
2011–12 measures of academic progress (map) reading % of Students by Quartile
76
95
mathematics 11 17
17 19
25
31
30
31
34
34
36
25
fall 5th
41
29
33
27
30
34
40
30
27
24
26
22
18
29
spring spring 7th spring 6th 5th
top quartile
28
third quartile
fall 5th
second quartile
kipp austin administered map to students in grades 5-7, and administered sat-10 to students in grade 8.
spring 18 spring 7th spring 6th 5th
bottom quartile
End–of–Course E OC
8509 fm 969, austin, tx 78724 • 512.501.3643 • www.kippaustin.org
kipp high school ap and sat results
1373
average sat
98%
high school 95% graduation
44%
took the sat
alumni attainment rates
(for graduating seniors)
took at least one ap
35%
scored 3 or above on at least one ap
(those who have completed 8th grade at kipp 5+ years ago)
85% college matriculation
schools kipp austin comunidad kipp austin connections elementary justin scott grades: k–2 est. 2010
kipp austin college prep freddy gonzalez grades: 5–8 est. 2002
bethany blevins grades: k–1 est. 2011
kipp austin vista middle school laura farber grades: 5 est. 2012
kipp austin academy of arts & letters kevin newman grades: 5–8 est. 2009
kipp austin beacon prep katie hayes grades: 5 est. 2012
kipp austin collegiate carrie donovan grades: 9–12 est. 2008
44
baltimore, md
kipp baltimore · est. 2002
74 1,025 number of students
K–3, 5–8 86% grades teachers retained within kipp
teachers (fte)
enrolled
served
80%
executive director
11%
5%
eligible for free/reduced price meals
jason botel
(73% retained in their position)
100%
receiving special education services
annual student attrition rate
0% 0% 0% 0%
African American
2012 maryland school assessment mathematics
reading 2012 MD R eading/E nglish Language Arts E xam 93 90 85 81 81 81 80 76 78 65 62 59
%% of Students of Students
100% 75%
77
71
2012 MD Mathematics E xam 94 90 86 83 80 76
69
65
49
50%
40
25% 0%
5th
6th
7th
8th
kipp advanced kipp proficient
5th
district advanced district proficient
6th
7th
8th
state advanced state proficient
2011–12 measures of academic progress (map)
% of Students by Quartile
reading 33
34
32
28
26
31
20
18
mathematics 38 17
29
20
30
20
18 26
19
fall k spring spring 1st k
23
25
25
28
40
32
35
42
36 31
spring 2nd
fall 5th
top quartile
33
31
20
31
30
33
29
26
30
24
26
spring 8th
spring spring spring 7th 5th 6th
third quartile
15
25
13 21 spring k spring fall k 1st
14 15 35
16 24
36
18
17
34
36
34
42
41
spring 7th
22
15 36
56
spring 2nd spring fall spring 5th 6th 5th
second quartile
bottom quartile
63
19 15
spring 8th
Latino Other Caucasian Asian
4701 greenspring avenue, baltimore, md 21209 • 410.367.0807 • www.kippbaltimore.org
kipp high school ap and act results
N/A
average act
N/A
high school 90% graduation
N/A
took the act
alumni attainment rates
took at least one ap
natalia walter grades: k–3 est. 2009
N/A
scored 3 or above on at least one ap
(those who have completed 8th grade at kipp 5+ years ago)
college 74% matriculation
schools kipp harmony academy
(for graduating seniors)
kipp ujima village academy mike lucas grades: 5–8 est. 2002
chicago, il
kipp chicago · est. 2003
K–2, 5–8 75% grades teachers retained within kipp
45 number of
745 students
teachers (fte)
enrolled
95%
served
executive director
10%
11%
eligible for free/reduced price meals
april goble
(67% retained in their position)
97%
receiving special education services
annual student attrition rate
3% Latino 0% Other 0% Caucasian 0% Asian
African American
2012 illinois standards achievement test reading
2012 IL Mathematics E xam
2012 IL R eading/E nglish Language Arts E xam 97 84 86 82 78 78 78 73 68 71 65 60
100% % Met/Exceeded Standard % ofofStudents % Students
mathematics
75%
84
77 76
78
85
78 79
85
65
50% 25% 0%
5th
6th
7th
5th
8th
kipp exceeds standard kipp meets standard
district exceeds standard district meets standard
6th
7th
state exceeds standard state meets standard
2011–12 measures of academic progress (map) reading
mathematics 25
% of Students by Quartile
83 81 85
27 27 21
16 27
40
26
fall k
14
22 25
13 19
24
30
44
41
34
23 29
18
spring k
spring 1st
31
fall 5th
23
27
spring spring 6th 5th
top quartile
34
21
14
31
32
33
28
26
11 45
24
16
28
14 spring 8th
spring 7th
third quartile
27
21 25 spring k spring fall k 1st
19
12
20
21
20
28
24
32
28
28
23
59
43
51
50
29
29
second quartile
fall 5th
spring 8th
spring 5th spring spring 6th 7th
bottom quartile
8th
1945 south halsted street, chicago, il 60608 • 312.733.8108 • www.kippchicago.org
kipp high school ap and act results
N/A
average act
N/A
school 96% high graduation
N/A
took the act
alumni attainment rates
(for graduating seniors)
took at least one ap
N/A
scored 3 or above on at least one ap
(those who have completed 8th grade at kipp 5+ years ago)
92% college matriculation
schools kipp ascend primary school ellen bhattacharyya grades: k–2 est. 2010
kipp ascend middle school lauren henley grades: 5–8 est. 2003
kipp create middle school kate mazurek grades: 5 est. 2012
denver, co
kipp colorado schools ¡ est. 2002
67 number of
895 students
5–12 52% grades teachers retained within kipp
teachers (fte)
enrolled
served
95%
executive director
9%
17%
eligible for free/reduced price meals
rebecca holmes
(43% retained in their position)
86%
receiving special education services
annual student attrition rate
7% African American 2% Other 3% Caucasian 1% Asian
Latino
2012 colorado student assessment program reading
mathematics 2012 C O Mathematics E xam
2012 C O R eading/E nglish Language Arts E xam
% Proficient + Advanced % of Students % of Students
100%
50%
74
70
75%
52 35
44
59
55
69
67
50
49 48
57
68 51
62
70 54
64 50 50
54 51
63
62
57
53 40
51 38
38 21 25
25% 0%
5th
6th
7th
8th
kipp advanced kipp proficient
9th
10th
5th
district advanced district proficient
6th
7th
8th
9th
state advanced state proficient
2011–12 measures of academic progress (map) reading
mathematics
% of Students by Quartile
32
15
20
28
25
33
35
38
28
59
fall 5th
spring spring 6th 5th
top quartile
16
23
37
31
33
36
21 21
32
14
spring spring 8th 7th
third quartile
38
16
67
second quartile
fall 5th
38
spring 5th
30
42
27
20
27
spring 7th
spring 6th
bottom quartile
23 26 14
spring 8th
21 22
33
10th
375 south tejon street, denver, co 80223 • 303.934.3245 • www.kippcolorado.org
kipp high school ap and act results
N/A
average act
N/A
high school 75% graduation
N/A
took the act
alumni attainment rates
(for graduating seniors)
took at least one ap
N/A
scored 3 or above on at least one ap
(those who have completed 8th grade at kipp 5+ years ago)
61% college matriculation
schools kipp montbello college prep nick bucy grades: 5–6 est. 2011
kipp sunshine peak academy emily yates grades: 5–8 est. 2002
kipp denver collegiate high school kurt pusch grades: 9–12 est. 2009
gaston, nc
kipp gaston college prep public schools · est. 2001
K, 5–12 grades
53 number of
806 students
teachers (fte)
enrolled
70% teachers retained within kipp
served
73%
executive director
6%
15%
eligible for free/reduced price meals
tammi sutton
(61% retained in their position)
75%
receiving special education services
annual student attrition rate
2% Latino 3% Other 19% Caucasian 1% Asian
African American
2012 north carolina end–of–grade test reading
Students % %ofofStudents
100% 75% 50%
mathematics
2012 NC R eading/E nglis h Language Arts E xam 96 91 89 87 83 75 74 72 71 71 68 66 53 45 45
83
82 64
2012 NC Mathematics E xam 96 95 95 85 81 80 79 70 67
86
81 79
25% 0%
5th
6th
7th
8th
End–of–Course E OC
kipp level iii & iv
5th
district level iii & iv
6th
7th
8th
End–of–Course E OC
state level iii & iv
2011–12 measures of academic progress (map)
% of Students by Quartile
reading
mathematics 25
25
27 28
34
31
34
26
26
28
15
fall 5th
32
18 27
26
11 27 spring spring 7th 6th spring 8th 18
top quartile
20
22
41
38
25
17
17
third quartile
26
fall 5th
second quartile
22 14 spring spring 8th 6th
bottom quartile
map results were not available for spring 2012 5th grade in reading and mathematics, and spring 2012 7th grade in mathematics. due to north carolina department of education suppression laws, we were unable to collect disaggregated proficiency band data for end of course/end of grade scores for 2011-12.
320 pleasant hill road, gaston, nc • 252.308.6932 • www.kippgaston.org
kipp high school ap and sat results
1401
average sat
100%
high school 91% graduation
65%
took the sat
alumni attainment rates
(for graduating seniors)
took at least one ap
27%
scored 3 or above on at least one ap
(those who have completed 8th grade at kipp 5+ years ago)
86% college matriculation
schools kipp gaston college preparatory primary emily cook dwight grades: k est. 2012
kipp gaston college preparatory michele stallings grades: 5–8 est. 2001
kipp pride high school kevika amar grades: 9–12 est. 2005
helena & blytheville, ar kipp delta public schools · est. 2002
78 number of
1,169
students enrolled
PreK–12 70% grades teachers retained within kipp
teachers (fte)
served
86%
executive director
6%
16%
eligible for free/reduced price meals
scott shirey
(57% retained in their position)
94%
receiving special education services
annual student attrition rate
1% Latino 0% Other 4% Caucasian 1% Asian
African American
2012 arkansas benchmark exam literacy
mathematics 2012 AR R eading/E nglis h Language Arts E xam
% of % ofStudents Students
100% 75%
82
75
85
66
2012 AR Mathematics E xam
93
85 66
81
80
78
75
69
67
90
80 68
64
90
87 67
65
47
50%
76
34
77
75
66
60 62
44
44
5th 5th
6th 6th
61
79
68 51
40
25% 0%
3rd
5th
6th
7th
8th
kipp advanced kipp proficient
3rd 3rd
11th
7th 7th
8th
state advanced state proficient
district advanced district proficient
2011–12 measures of academic progress (map)
% of Students by Quartile
reading
mathematics
23
39
33
32
19
19
39
32
fall k
spring k
14
14
14 30
32
31
27
29
26
32
28
29
29
29
28
35
34
28
32
spring 3rd
fall 5th
41
24 21
38
27
27
44
spring k
30
21
38
39
spring spring 2nd 1st
top quartile
14 spring spring spring 6th spring 8th 5th 7th
third quartile
fall k
35 15
39
15
25
16
spring 3rd
spring 1st
second quartile
spring 2nd
25
20
28
27
43
fall 5th
27
spring 5th
23
25
26
31
29
36
25
18
25
19
27
16
26
38
12
17 32
35
23
18
spring spring spring 8th 6th 7th
bottom quartile
End–of–Course E OC
415 ohio street, helena, ar 72342 • 870.753.9035 • www.kippdelta.org
kipp high school ap and act results
21
average act
100%
68%
took the act
took at least one ap
alumni attainment rates high school 92% graduation
(for graduating seniors)
41%
scored 3 or above on at least one ap
(those who have completed 8th grade at kipp 5+ years ago)
80% college matriculation
schools kipp delta elementary literacy academy amanda johnson grades: prek–4 est. 2009
kipp blytheville college preparatory maisie wright grades: 4–7 est. 2010
kipp delta college preparatory marcus nelson grades: 5–8 est. 2002
kipp delta collegiate high school todd dixon grades: 9–12 est. 2006
houston, tx
kipp houston public schools · est. 1995
PreK3–12 70% grades teachers retained within kipp
507 9,583 number of students
teachers (fte)
enrolled
served
86%
executive director
4%
12%
eligible for free/reduced price meals
sehba ali
(65% retained in their position)
60%
receiving special education services
annual student attrition rate
35% African American 1% Other 3% Caucasian 1% Asian
Latino
2012 state of texas assessments of academic readiness reading/english language arts
mathematics 2012 T X Mathematics E xam
2012 T X R eading/E nglish Language Arts E xam 100%
% of% Students of Students
78 75%
71
87
77
71
78 65
70
77
76 63
89
82
74
67
76
75
80
82
78
67 63 68
68
66 68
65
71
78
76
67
77
75
69
76
74
82
25% 0%
3rd
4th
5th
6th
8th End–of–Course E OC
7th
kipp level iii: advanced kipp level ii: satisfactory
3rd
4th
district level iii: advanced district level ii: satisfactory
5th
6th
7th
8th
state level iii: advanced state level ii: satisfactory
2011–12 measures of academic progress (map) reading % of Students by Quartile
90
82
53
51
50%
71
40
mathematics 27
25
25
32
27
28
33
18
23
25
26
spring 1st
25
22
14
spring spring spring 4th 2nd 3rd
top quartile
16
16
25
11
33
25
31
38
34
35
24
28
33
30
28
26
28
fall 5th
32
24
29
25
15
35
16
14
spring spring 8th 7th spring spring 6th 5th
third quartile
14
spring 1st
37
23
16
25
22
29
30
24
31
25
29
28
24
18
28
spring 2nd
11 spring spring 3rd 4th
second quartile
22
12
23
29
fall 5th
22
30
40
36
24
22
12 spring spring 8th spring 7th spring 6th 5th 27
22
14
bottom quartile
End–of–Course E OC
10711 kipp way, houston, tx 77099 • 823.328.1051 • www.kipphouston.org
kipp high school ap and act results
19
average act
94%
82%
took the act
alumni attainment rates high school 94% graduation
(for graduating seniors)
took at least one ap
58%
scored 3 or above on at least one ap
(those who have completed 8th grade at kipp 5+ years ago)
88% college matriculation
schools: primary kipp coastal village primary school lynn barnes* grades: prek–4 est. 2009
kipp peace elementary school aundrea johnson grades: k–1 est. 2011
kipp dream prep olive hayden–moore grades: prek3–4 est. 2006
kipp sharp college prep lower school alma salman grades: prek3–4 est. 2008
kipp explore academy frank cush grades: prek3–3 est. 2009
kipp shine prep deb shifrine grades: prek3–4 est. 2004
kipp legacy preparatory school tresha francis grades: prek–2 est. 2010
kipp zenith academy tiffany george prados grades: prek3–3 est. 2009
schools: middle kipp 3d academy alison cumbley grades: 5–8 est. 2001
kipp intrepid preparatory school steve khadam–hir grades: 5–8 est. 2008
kipp academy middle school andrew rubin grades: 5–8 est. 1995
kipp coastal village middle school lynn barnes* grades: 5–7 est. 2010
kipp liberation college kipp polaris academy prep for boys tai ingram grades: 5–8 est. 2006
simone senior grades: 5–8 est. 2007
kipp spirit college prep kipp voyage academy for girls charles king grades: 5–8 est. 2006
tasha ginn grades: 5–8 est. 2009
schools: high kipp generations collegiate denise rodríguez grades: 9–10 est. 2011
kipp houston high school lara wheatley grades: 9–12 est. 2004
currently, these two schools are both being led by lynn barnes.*
kipp sunnyside high school john allen grades: 9–11 est. 2010
kipp courage college prep eric schmidt grades: 5 est. 2012
kipp sharpstown college prep karima wilson grades: 5–8 est. 2007
jacksonville, fl
kipp jacksonville schools ¡ est. 2010
K, 5–7 grades
29
367 students
number of teachers (fte)
enrolled
89%
tom majdanics
served
executive director
12%
22%
eligible for free/reduced price meals
96%
receiving special education services
annual student attrition rate
African American
2012 florida comprehensive assessment test
% of Students % of Students
100%
reading 2012 FL R eading/E nglish Language Arts E xam
75%
56
41
30
25%
69
61
50%
0%
5th
mathematics 2012 FL Mathematics E xam
51
57
55 56
47
53
31
5th
6th
kipp level 4/level 5 kipp level 3
district level 4/level 5 district level 3
6th
state level 4/level 5 state level 3
2011–12 measures of academic progress (map)
% of Students by Quartile
reading
mathematics 21
12 21
13
13
11
30
27
30
27
34
30 65
27
17 17
29
26 63
spring spring 5th 6th fall 5th
top quartile
30
44
spring 6th
spring 5th
fall 5th
third quartile
second quartile
bottom quartile
1% Latino 2% Other 2% Caucasian 0% Asian
1440 mcduff avenue north, jacksonville, fl 32254 • 904.683.6643 • www.kippjax.org
kipp high school ap and act results
N/A
average act
N/A
N/A
took the act
alumni attainment rates school N/A high graduation
took at least one ap
ashley ferguson* grades: k est. 2012
N/A
scored 3 or above on at least one ap
(those who have completed 8th grade at kipp 5+ years ago)
N/A college matriculation
schools kipp voice elementary school
(for graduating seniors)
kipp impact middle school ashley ferguson* grades: 5–7 est. 2010
currently, these two schools are both being led by ashley ferguson.*
los angeles, ca
kipp la schools ¡ est. 2003 served
teachers (fte)
enrolled
85% teachers retained within kipp
K–8 grades
129 number of
2,194 students
89%
executive director
9%
9%
eligible for free/reduced price meals
marcia aaron
(85% retained in their position)
65%
receiving special education services
annual student attrition rate
33% African American 1% Other 0% Caucasian 0% Asian
Latino
2012 california standards test english language arts
%% ofofStudents Students
100%
mathematics
2012 C A R eading/E nglish Language Arts E xam 91
87 55 58
50%
43
48
57 54
63
70
59 47
2012 C A Mathematics E xam 86
85
82
75%
100
98
62 49
48
59
57
74
69 69
64
61 65
63 45
55
54 41
49 35
25% 0%
2nd
3rd
5th
6th
kipp advanced kipp proficient
7th
2nd
8th
3rd
district advanced district proficient
5th
6th
state advanced state proficient
2011–12 measures of academic progress (map) reading 37 % of Students by Quartile
81
29
32
37
43
15
19
12
mathematics
13
spring spring 3rd 2nd
25
23
25
29
30
35 fall 5th
19
16 34
35
28
16
33
20 26
36
39
31
23
21
29
11 spring spring 8th 7th 17
spring spring 5th 6th
top quartile
24
spring 2nd
49 19 19
31
spring 3rd
44
19
37
31
20
27
30
30
16
24
spring 5th
20
56
19 18 spring 8th
spring 6th spring 7th
fall 5th
third quartile
second quartile
bottom quartile
kipp la administered sat-10 to students in kindergarten and first grade, and administered map to students in grades 2-8.
7th
8th
4545 dozier avenue, los angeles, ca 90022 • 213.489.4461 • www.kippla.org
kipp high school ap and act results
N/A
average act
N/A
N/A
took the act
alumni attainment rates school 96% high graduation
(for graduating seniors)
took at least one ap
N/A
scored 3 or above on at least one ap
(those who have completed 8th grade at kipp 5+ years ago)
college 91% matriculation
schools kipp comienza community prep margarita florez grades: k–2 est. 2010
kipp la college preparatory school carlos lanuza grades: 5–8 est. 2003
kipp empower academy mike kerr grades: k–2 est. 2010
kipp philosophers academy reginald greene grades: 5 est. 2012
kipp raíces academy amber young medina grades: k–4 est. 2008
kipp scholar academy tiffany moore grades: 5 est. 2012
kipp academy of opportunity archana patel grades: 5–8 est. 2003
lynn and boston, ma kipp massachusetts ¡ est. 2004
89% 5–10 teachers retained within kipp grades
61
657 students
number of teachers (fte)
enrolled
served
84%
executive director
15%
7%
eligible for free/reduced price meals
caleb dolan
(80% retained in their position)
54%
receiving special education services
annual student attrition rate
32% African American 1% Other 10% Caucasian 3% Asian
Latino
2012 massachusetts comprehensive assessment system mathematics
english language arts 100%
%%of of Students Students
84 75% 50%
2012 MA Mathematics E xam
2012 MA R eading/E nglis h Language Arts E xam
61
52 48
66
59
64
59
50
39
81
71
60
57 31
41
5th
6th
7th
5th
8th
kipp advanced kipp proficient
dsitrict advanced district proficient
37 21
25% 0%
52
51
48
38 39
6th
7th
28
8th
state advanced state proficient
2011–12 measures of academic progress (map)
% of Students by Quartile
reading 31
mathematics 36
34
24
30
33
22
22
24
26
33
28
25
22
11
15
17
fall 5th
spring spring spring spring 8th 5th 6th 7th
top quartile
22
36
23
13
39
third quartile
22
45
28
31
15
19
22 24
39
24 14 fall 5th spring 5th
second quartile
50
41
23 13
spring 6th
spring spring 7th 8th
bottom quartile
90 high rock street, lynn, ma 01902 • 781.598.1609 • www.kippma.org
kipp high school ap and act results
N/A
average act
N/A
N/A
took the act
alumni attainment rates school N/A high graduation
(for graduating seniors)
N/A
took at least one ap
scored 3 or above on at least one ap
(those who have completed 8th grade at kipp 5+ years ago)
college N/A matriculation
schools kipp academy boston christine barford grades: 5 est. 2012
kipp academy lynn anna breen grades: 5–8 est. 2004
kipp academy lynn collegiate drea deangelo grades: 9–10 est. 2011
memphis, tn
kipp memphis collegiate schools · est. 2002
K, 5–10 61% teachers retained within kipp grades
49
771 students
number of teachers (fte)
enrolled
served
89%
executive director
12%
13%
eligible for free/reduced price meals
jamal mccall
(39% retained in their position)
98%
receiving special education services
annual student attrition rate
2% 0% 0% 0%
African American
Latino Other Caucasian Asian
2012 tennessee comprehensive assessment program reading/language arts
%% ofofStudents Students
100%
2012 T N R eading/E nglis h Language Arts E xam
75% 50%
60 44 40
38 34
5th
47 33
6th
2012 T N Mathematics E xam
66
57
51
48
42
25
26
7th
8th
25% 0%
mathematics
44
kipp advanced kipp proficient
26
5th
district advanced district proficient
45
43
34
End–of–Course E OC
60
56
53
28
26
21 6th
7th
state advanced state proficient
% of Students by Quartile
25 29
mathematics 11
17
37
27
18
17
31
26
23
27
34
32
25 23 28 spring spring spring 6th 5th 7th spring 8th fall 5th 40
13 23
26
29
28
34
28
24
54
35
14
26
top quartile
third quartile
fall 5th
second quartile
38
spring spring 5th 6th
37
18 8th
2011–12 measures of academic progress (map) reading
38
18 27
41
spring 7th spring 8th
bottom quartile
46
40 25
End–of–Course E OC
2670 union avenue extended, memphis, tn 38112 • 901.452.2682 • www.kippmemphis.org
kipp high school ap and act results
N/A
average act
N/A
high school 95% graduation
N/A
took the act
alumni attainment rates
(for graduating seniors)
took at least one ap
N/A
scored 3 or above on at least one ap
(those who have completed 8th grade at kipp 5+ years ago)
college 72% matriculation
schools kipp memphis collegiate elementary school grace williams grades: k est. 2012
kipp memphis academy middle andy bobowski grades: 5 est. 2012
kipp memphis collegiate middle school andrea criollo grades: 5–8 est. 2002
kipp memphis collegiate high school richard bailey & jerry sanders grades: 9–10 est. 2011
new orleans, la
kipp new orleans schools · est. 2006 teachers (fte)
enrolled
96%
72% teachers retained within kipp
K–11 grades
245 3,214 number of students
served
11%
14%
eligible for free/reduced price meals
rhonda kalifey–aluise executive director
(66% retained in their position)
97%
receiving special education services
annual student attrition rate
1% Latino 0% Other 2% Caucasian 0% Asian
African American
2012 integrated louisiana educational assessment program english language arts 2012 LA R eading/E nglish Language Arts E xam
% of % ofStudents Students
100% 75% 50%
mathematics
66
75
69 55
53 57
3rd
4th
64
70
81
71
2012 LA Mathematics E xam 90
69
69
55
54
55
5th
6th
7th
73
78
67
68
71
62
55
50
65
73
70
66
54
77 59
49
78
70
70
81
55
63
50
25% 0%
8th End–of–Course E OC
kipp mastery/advanced kipp basic
3rd
4th
5th
district mastery/advanced district basic
6th
7th
8th
End–of–Course E OC
state mastery/advanced state basic
2011–12 measures of academic progress (map) reading % of Students by Quartile
79
76 64
mathematics 12
12 16
23
18
20
25
33
26
32
33
25
40 46
40
41
43
13
24
17
20
27
27
32
31
24
30
32
28
28
29
27
33
spring spring 4th spring spring spring k 3rd 1st fall k 2nd
top quartile
17
55
41
33
spring spring 8th spring 7th spring 6th 5th fall 5th
third quartile
16
11 17 25
27
23
23
31
39 56
13 12 27
28
29
31
39
26
29
22
34
33
30
21
19
42 24
39
47
31
16
spring spring spring 4th k spring spring 3rd 1st fall k 2nd
second quartile
21
22
41
60
fall 5th
27
spring spring 6th 5th
bottom quartile
17
spring spring 8th 7th
3820 st. claude avenue, new orleans, la 70117 • 504.373.6269 • www.kippneworleans.org
kipp high school ap and act results
N/A
average act
N/A
high school N/A graduation
N/A
took the act
alumni attainment rates
(for graduating seniors)
N/A
took at least one ap
scored 3 or above on at least one ap
(those who have completed 8th grade at kipp 5+ years ago)
college N/A matriculation
schools kipp believe primary sarah greenberg grades: k–1 est. 2011
kipp believe college prep adam meinig grades: 5–8 est. 2006
kipp renaissance high school jon robertson grades: 9–11 est. 2010
kipp central city primary korbin johnson grades: k–4 est. 2008
kipp central city academy alex jarrell grades: 5–8 est. 2007
kipp mcdonogh 15 primary mark burton grades: k–4 est. 2006
kipp mcdonogh 15 middle luke naegele & deanna reddick grades: 5–8 est. 2006
kipp new orleans leadership primary colin smith grades: k–1 est. 2011
kipp new orleans leadership academy jared lamb grades: 5–7 est. 2010
new york city, ny kipp nyc · est. 1995
K–3, 5–12 83% grades teachers retained within kipp
243
2,916 students
number of teachers (fte)
enrolled
served
88%
executive director
15%
7%
eligible for free/reduced price meals
josh zoia
(81% retained in their position)
49%
receiving special education services
annual student attrition rate
48% African American 3% Other 0% Caucasian 0% Asian
Latino
2012 new york state assessment english language arts
2012 NY Mathematics E xam
2012 NY R eading/E nglis h Language Arts E xam 96
100%
Students %% ofofStudents
mathematics
76
75%
58 50%
42
53
47
52
70
51
34
30
28
25
5th
6th
7th
8th
25% 0%
56
46
84
End–of–Course E OC
kipp level 4 kipp level 3
85
76
66
85
65
83
65
46
42
40
40
5th
6th
7th
8th
district level 4 district level 3
62
62
End–of–Course E OC
state level 4 state level 3
2011–12 measures of academic progress (map)
% of Students by Quartile
reading 18 30
37
37
24
fall k
22
27
30
35
29
27
21
25
25
26
30
15 15
mathematics 26
spring k
22
spring 1st
14
spring 2nd
top quartile
35
fall 5th
20
13
20
36
40
32
28
19
spring spring 5th 6th
25 27 43
19 13
12 spring spring 8th 7th
third quartile
31
34
19
17
28
24
27
22
29
23 27
fall k
spring k
28
42
15 spring spring 2nd 1st
second quartile
22
18
23
28
23
25
32
38
31
29
27
23
28
30
41
fall 5th
11 11 27 26 spring spring 7th 8th spring spring 6th 5th
bottom quartile
high school district/state comparisons are from 2011 because 2012 results were not available at the time of publication.
73
470 7th avenue, new york, ny 10018 • 212.991.2610 • www.kippnyc.org
kipp high school ap and act results
N/A
average act
N/A
school 95% high graduation
N/A
took the act
alumni attainment rates
(for graduating seniors)
took at least one ap
N/A
scored 3 or above on at least one ap
(those who have completed 8th grade at kipp 5+ years ago)
89% college matriculation
schools kipp academy elementary carolyn petruzziello grades: k–3 est. 2009
kipp amp academy debon lewis grades: 5–8 est. 2005
kipp nyc college prep high school natalie webb grades: 9–12 est. 2009
kipp infinity elementary school stephanie adams & lindsay fry grades: k–2 est. 2010
kipp infinity charter school allison holley grades: 5–8 est. 2005
kipp star elementary school anokhi saraiya grades: k–1 est. 2011
kipp star college prep charter school stacy johnson grades: 5–8 est. 2003
kipp academy new york frank corcoran grades: 5–8 est. 1995
kipp washington heights danny swersky grades: 5 est. 2012
newark, nj
team schools, a kipp region · est. 2002
K–3, 5–12 81% teachers retained within kipp grades
168
1,801 students
number of teachers (fte)
enrolled
served
87%
executive director
13%
8%
eligible for free/reduced price meals
ryan hill
(81% retained in their position)
94%
receiving special education services
annual student attrition rate
5% Latino 1% Other 0% Caucasian 0% Asian
African American
2012 new jersey assessment of knowledge and skills mathematics
language art literacy
%% ofofStudents Students
64
63 35
30
25% 0%
5th
61
51
48
47
92
91
82
77
75% 50%
2012 NJ Mathematics E xam
2012 NJ R eading/E nglish Language Arts E xam
100%
83
80
77
83
58
57
79 60
7th
8th
5th
11th
kipp advanced kipp proficient
district advanced district proficient
6th
80 67
7th
8th
11th
state advanced state proficient
2011–12 measures of academic progress (map)
% of Students by Quartile
reading 24 33
29 14
fall k
43
mathematics 34
38
24
25
19
18
15
18
16 37 22
spring spring spring 2nd k 1st
top quartile
19
21
13
28
34
28
32
32
24
29
30
33
34
21
24
14 21 spring spring 7th spring 5th spring 6th 8th fall 5th 39
third quartile
16
13 27
28
25
23
35
spring k
29
22
36
12 11 spring 2nd
17
fall k
15
54
31
19
spring 1st
18 30
31
31
24
22
19
43
28
21
19
fall 5th
second quartile
28 28 26
21 18 spring spring 7th spring 5th spring 8th 6th 26
44
59
45
34
29
6th
63
57
54
71
bottom quartile
60 park place, newark, nj, 07102 • 973.622.0905 • www.teamschools.org
kipp high school ap and sat results
1250
average sat
98%
31%
took the sat
alumni attainment rates school 94% high graduation
(for graduating seniors)
2%
took at least one ap
scored 3 or above on at least one ap
(those who have completed 8th grade at kipp 5+ years ago)
88% college matriculation
schools spark academy, a kipp school
thrive academy, a kipp school
joanna belcher grades: k–3 est. 2009
newark collegiate academy, a kipp school shawadeim reagans & bridgett hitchings grades: 9–12 est. 2007
lindsay schambach grades: k est. 2012
rise academy, a kipp school drew martin grades: 5–8 est. 2006
team academy, a kipp school marc tan grades: 5–8 est. 2002
philadelphia, pa
kipp philadelphia schools · est. 2003
K–2, 5–11 71% grades teachers retained within kipp
83 1,256 number of students
teachers (fte)
enrolled
served
86%
executive director
19%
10%
eligible for free/reduced price meals
marc mannella
(59% retained in their position)
92%
receiving special education services
annual student attrition rate
4% Latino 3% Other 0% Caucasian 0% Asian
African American
2012 pennsylvania system of school assessment reading
2012 P A Mathematics E xam
2012 P A R eading/E nglis h Language Arts E xam
100%
%% ofofStudents Students
mathematics
75%
65
50%
27
25% 0%
76
68
60
39 43
34
5th
6th
80
76
78
74 60
58
52
44 45
7th
5th
8th
kipp advanced kipp proficient
district advanced district proficient
83
80 56
53
6th
7th
8th
state advanced state proficient
mathematics
% of Students by Quartile
45
49
22
23
16 30
34 14
fall k
34
33
15 35
spring k spring 1st
26
23
24
28
33
42
fall 5th
22 27
40
12
11
29
28
31 28
31
31
spring spring spring 7th spring 5th 6th 8th
34
31 26
fall k
18 34
28 15
29
spring k
14
18
22
29
26
25
31
35
29
57
51
40
31
45
fall 5th
top quartile
third quartile
20
19
spring 1st
second quartile
77
53
2011–12 measures of academic progress (map) reading
79
spring spring 7th spring spring 6th 8th 5th
bottom quartile
5900 baltimore avenue, philadelphia, pa 19143 • 215.294.8596 • www.kippphiladelphia.org
kipp high school ap and act results
N/A
average act
N/A
school 94% high graduation
N/A
took the act
alumni attainment rates
(for graduating seniors)
took at least one ap
N/A
scored 3 or above on at least one ap
(those who have completed 8th grade at kipp 5+ years ago)
74% college matriculation
schools kipp philadelphia elementary school ben speicher grades: k–2 est. 2010
kipp philadelphia charter school meredith mehra grades: 5–8 est. 2003
kipp west philadelphia kipp dubois collegiate preparatory academy shawna wells grades: 5–8 est. 2009
aaron bass grades: 9–11 est. 2010
san antonio, tx
kipp san antonio · est. 2003
K, 5–12 79% grades teachers retained within kipp
82 number of
1,201 students
teachers (fte)
enrolled
served
84%
executive director
9%
15%
eligible for free/reduced price meals
mark larson
(76% retained in their position)
93%
receiving special education services
annual student attrition rate
4% African American 1% Other 2% Caucasian 0% Asian
Latino
2012 state of texas assessments of academic readiness reading
mathematics
2012 T X R eading/E nglish Language Arts E xam 100%
% of Students % of Students
77 75%
53
64
63 60
74
76
84
64 62
69
80
74
2012 T X Mathematics E xam
68
78 66 66
77
75
84
86 74
57
48
50% 25% 0%
5th
6th
7th
8th
End–of–Course E OC
kipp level iii: advanced kipp level ii: satisfactory
5th
6th
district level iii: advanced district level ii: satisfactory
7th
8th
state level iii: advanced state level ii: satisfactory
2011–12 measures of academic progress (map) reading % of Students by Quartile
76
71
59
53
92
84
mathematics 23
14
14
14
21
27
31
30
27
29
32
35
38
fall 5th
30
27
21
18 42
19
spring spring spring 7th 6th 5th
top quartile
28
32
39
41
31
29
26
23
22
33
fall 5th
third quartile
24
27
16
spring 8th
32 21
second quartile
24
21
spring spring 6th 5th
14 spring 7th spring 8th
bottom quartile
End–of–Course E OC
731 fredericksburg road, san antonio, tx 78201 • 210.787.3197 • www.kippsa.org
kipp high school ap and act results
N/A
average act
N/A
high school 96% graduation
N/A
took the act
alumni attainment rates
(for graduating seniors)
took at least one ap
N/A
scored 3 or above on at least one ap
(those who have completed 8th grade at kipp 5+ years ago)
86% college matriculation
schools kipp un mundo dual language academy luzdivina lozano grades: k est. 2012
kipp aspire academy roy feliciano grades: 5–8 est. 2003
kipp camino academy brennecke hinojoa grades: 5–7 est. 2010
kipp university prep high school jennifer zinn grades: 9–12 est. 2009
san francisco bay area, ca kipp bay area schools · est. 2002
133 number of
2,600
students enrolled
5–12 grades
teachers (fte)
76%
79% teachers retained within kipp
served
executive director
7%
8%
eligible for free/reduced price meals
beth sutkus thompson
(71% retained in their position)
53%
receiving special education services
annual student attrition rate
24% African American 2% Other 3% Caucasian 17% Asian
Latino
2012 california standards test english language arts
mathematics 2012 C A Mathematics E xam
2012 C A R eading/E nglish Language Arts E xam
% of% of Students Students
100% 75%
76 64
58
63 50
50%
59
81
79
76 55
62
59
54
86
78 65
53 57
48 50
39
48
59
65
87
76
73 47
55
44
56
55
48
32
40
45
48
42 44
38
25% 0%
5th
6th
7th
8th
9th
10th
kipp advanced kipp proficient
11th
5th
district advanced district proficient
6th
7th
8th
9th
10th
state advanced state proficient
2011–12 measures of academic progress (map) reading % of Students by Quartile
33 36
mathematics 14
21
17
18
25
30
28
35
31
34
24
26
31
28
24
32
25
17
24
fall 5th
spring spring spring 5th 6th 7th
top quartile
15
38
30
26
23
26
21
27
24
22
32
20
21
17
40
second quartile
30
23
fall 5th
third quartile
23
19
16
spring 8th
25
spring spring spring 8th 7th spring 6th 5th
bottom quartile
free/reduced lunch data represents 2011-12 for all schools, except kipp heartwood. heartwood is a nslp provision 2 school and was not required to collect meal applications. for reporting purposes, the school carries forward its most current fr/l data from 2011–12.
11th
1404 franklin street, suite 500 oakland, ca 94612 • 510.465.5477 • www.kippbayarea.org
kipp high school ap and sat results
1524
average sat
97%
school 96% high graduation
93%
took the sat
alumni attainment rates
(for graduating seniors)
77%
took at least one ap
scored 3 or above on at least one ap
(those who have completed 8th grade at kipp 5+ years ago)
85% college matriculation
schools kipp bayview academy kerianne ryan grades: 5–8 est. 2003
kipp summit academy ric zappa grades: 5–8 est. 2003
kipp bridge charter school lolita jackson grades: 5–8 est. 2002
kipp king collegiate high school kate belden grades: 9–12 est. 2007
kipp heartwood academy judy tang grades: 5–8 est. 2004
kipp san jose collegiate tom ryan grades: 9–12 est. 2008
kipp san francisco bay academy kyle shaffer grades: 5–8 est. 2003
washington, dc kipp dc · est. 2001
PreK3–12 75% grades teachers retained within kipp
253 number of
3,040 students
teachers (fte)
enrolled
81%
served
executive director
12%
12%
eligible for free/reduced price meals
susan schaeffler
67% retained in their position)
97%
receiving special education services
annual student attrition rate
1% Latino 2% Other 0% Caucasian 0% Asian
African American
2012 dc comprehensive assessment system reading
2012 DC Mathematics E xam
2012 DC R eading/E nglis h Language Arts E xam
100%
% of Students % of Students
mathematics
89 76
74
75%
52
50%
41 41
45 49 49
49 46 48
54 39 41
44
6th
7th
50
44
51
49
60 44 44 28
25% 0%
3rd
4th
5th
8th
3rd
10th
kipp advanced kipp proficient
40 38
76
69
65 51 52
47 50
45 49
51
4th
5th
6th
7th
district advanced district proficient
95
59
51
58 42 44
8th
10th
state advanced state proficient
2011–12 measures of academic progress (map)
% of Students by Quartile
reading 36
28
27
28
23
26
14
fall k
18
spring k
mathematics
15
17
27
23
35
22
39
17
11
12
11
15
25
29
24
25
29
29
36
31
30
29
33
35
30
23
24 35 40 spring spring spring 3rd spring 1st fall 2nd 4th 5th
top quartile
15
23
13
35
33
31
32
25
28
25
30
14 spring 24 spring 8th spring spring 7th 5th 6th 26
19
third quartile
kipp dc’s 4th grade was composed entirely of students new to kipp in 2011-12.
23
fall k
20
21
43
30
31
15 24
40
16 27
28
spring 2nd
spring 3rd
31
spring 4th
55
27
40
46
28
27
28
29
25
21
22
18
32
23
25
spring k spring 1st
second quartile
16
spring 5th
fall 5th
bottom quartile
24
spring 6th
11 spring spring 8th 7th
1003 k street nw, washington, d.c. 20001 • 202.223.4505 • www.kippdc.org
kipp high school ap and act results
N/A
average act
N/A
N/A
took the act
alumni attainment rates high school 95% graduation
(for graduating seniors)
N/A
took at least one ap
scored 3 or above on at least one ap
(those who have completed 8th grade at kipp 5+ years ago)
75% college matriculation
schools kipp dc: discover academy philonda johnson grades: pre3–k est. 2009
kipp dc: leap academy abraham clayman grades: prek3–k est. 2007
kipp dc: will academy kate finley grades: 4–8 est. 2006
kipp dc: grow academy stacie kossoy grades: prek3–k est. 2010
kipp dc: promise academy casey fullerton grades: 1–4 est. 2009
kipp dc: college preparatory jessica cunningham grades: 9–12 est. 2009
kipp dc: heights academy cherese brauer grades: 1–2 est. 2011
kipp dc: aim academy kristy ochs grades: 5–8 est. 2005
kipp dc: lead academy mekia love grades: 1 est. 2012
kipp dc: key academy david ayala grades: 5–8 est. 2001
albany, ny kipp tech valley | grades: 5–8 | est. 2005
24 number of
304 students
1school
teachers (fte)
enrolled
81%
1 dudley heights, albany, ny 12210 518.694.9494 www.kipptechvalley.org
school leader
6%
23%
eligible for free/reduced price meals
don applyrs
88%
receiving special education services
annual student attrition rate
6% Latino 2% Other 4% Caucasian 1% Asian
African American
2012 new york state assessment 100%
english arts Arts E xam 2012 NY language R eading/E nglis h Language
mathematics 2012 NY Mathematics E xam
% of Students % of Students
75%
58 50%
32
39
51
67
56 40
52 36 32
25% 0%
5th
6th
7th
53
50
41
65
65 37
23
8th
(those who have completed 8th grade at kipp 5+ years ago)
61
51
24
kipp level 4 kipp level 3
alumni attainment rates
48
90
87
82
5th
district level 4 district level 3
6th
7th
8th
state level 4 state level 3
high school N/A graduation
N/A college matriculation
kiipp tech valley transitioned from terranova to map in 2012-13; thus map data is not available for the 2011-12 academic year.
charlotte, nc kipp charlotte | grades: 5–8 | est. 2007
25 number of
343 students
1school
teachers (fte)
enrolled
77%
931 wilann drive, charlotte, nc 28215 704.537.2044 www.kippcharlotte.org
school leader
19%
10%
eligible for free/reduced price meals
tiffany flowers
93%
receiving special education services
annual student attrition rate
4% Latino 2% Other 1% Caucasian 0% Asian
African American
2012 north carolina end–of–grade test
%% ofofStudents Students
100% 75%
english arts Arts E xam 2012 NC language R eading/E nglis h Language 64
73 74 75
74 72
59
68 68
71 71 71
mathematics 2012 NC Mathematics E xam 74
90
84 82
87
79 80
80 81
83 86 85
74 75 79
50% 25% 0%
5th
6th
7th
5th
8th
kipp level iii & iv
district level iii & iv
6th
7th
8th
End–of–Course E OC
state level iii & iv
2011–12 measures of academic progress (map)
% of Students by Quartile
reading
mathematics 26
12
19
19 33
40
30
31
29
fall 5th
36
42
17
spring 5th
26
39
30
27
23
26
25
27
32
spring 8th
37
29
15
third quartile
alumni attainment rates
(those who have completed 8th grade at kipp 5+ years ago)
15
38
33
39
28
22
23
15
30
23
spring spring 6th spring 8th spring 7th fall 5th 5th
spring spring 7th 6th
top quartile
15
17
second quartile
school N/A high graduation
bottom quartile
N/A college matriculation
due to north carolina department of education suppression laws, we were unable to collect disaggregated proficiency band data for end of course/end of grade scores for 2011–12.
columbus, oh
kipp central ohio ¡ est. 2008 kipp journey academy | grades: 5–8
20 number of
332 students
1school
teachers (fte)
enrolled
93%
1406 myrtle avenue, columbus, oh 43211 614.263.6137 www.kippcentralohio.org
86%
receiving special education services
annual student attrition rate
school leader
executive director
17%
20%
eligible for free/reduced price meals
hannah powell dustin wood
2% Latino 5% Other 7% Caucasian 0% Asian
African American
2012 ohio achievement test
%% ofofStudents Students
100%
english arts Arts E xam 2012 OH language R eading/E nglish Language
50%
87
77
75%
49
80
67
66
55
55
56
mathematics 2012 OH Mathematics E xam
84
82
81 68
62
65
73
63
56
48
42 39
82
79 53
25% 0%
5th
6th
7th
kipp accelerated/advanced kipp proficient
8th
5th
6th
7th
8th
state accelerated/advanced state proficient
district accelerated/advanced district proficient
2011–12 measures of academic progress (map)
% of Students by Quartile
reading
mathematics 18
21 38
24
19
29
23
34
40
39
27
16
22
29
34
21
28
22
20
16 36 38
fall 5th
16
11
12
49
spring 5th spring 6th
17
spring 7th
top quartile
alumni attainment rates
spring 8th
60
fall 5th
third quartile
(those who have completed 8th grade at kipp 5+ years ago)
second quartile
school N/A high graduation
24 23 35
30
37
18 spring spring spring 7th 8th spring 6th 5th 40
bottom quartile
N/A college matriculation
dallas, tx
kipp dallas–fort worth · est. 2003 kipp truth academy | grades 5–8
22 number of
353 students
1school
teachers (fte)
enrolled
93%
3200 south lancaster road, dallas, tx 75216 214.375.8326 www.kippdfw.org
7%
9%
eligible for free/reduced price meals
executive director
school leader
60%
receiving special education services
annual student attrition rate
quinton vance michael horne
39% African American 1% Other 0% Caucasian 0% Asian
Latino
2012 state of texas assessments of academic readiness
%% ofofStudents Students
100% 75%
english language arts Arts E xam 2012 T X R eading/E nglish Language 62
68
77
78 63
78
74
67
76
85 71
mathematics 2012 T X Mathematics E xam
80
81
78 59
67
64
83
77
60
94 76
71
50%
52
25% 0%
5th
6th
7th
8th
kipp advanced kipp satisfactory
5th
district advanced district satisfactory
6th
7th
8th
state advanced state satisfactory
2011–12 measures of academic progress (map)
% of Students by Quartile
reading
mathematics
12 38
24 29
fall 5th
14
28
34
29
34
12
13
44
41
22
18
32
14 spring spring spring 7th 8th spring 6th 5th 19
top quartile
alumni attainment rates
third quartile
(those who have completed 8th grade at kipp 5+ years ago)
41
33
32
38
30
32
28
23
20
19
spring 7th
22
30
20
27
22
spring spring 6th 5th fall 5th
second quartile
school 93% high graduation
58
28
spring 8th
bottom quartile
77% college matriculation
indianapolis, in kipp indianapolis college preparatory | grades: 5–8 | est. 2004
19 number of
289 students
1school
teachers (fte)
enrolled
3202 e 42nd sreet, indianapolis, in 46205 317.547.5477 www.kippindy.org
school leader
executive director
91%
17%
39%
eligible for free/reduced price meals
aleesia johnson
emily pelino
95%
receiving special education services
annual student attrition rate
0% 2% 2% 0%
African American
Latino Other Caucasian Asian
2012 indiana statewide testing for educational progress
%% ofofStudents Students
100% 75% 50%
2012 IN R eading/E nglish Language english language artsArts E xam
62
54
85
77
76
73
73 53
53
2012 IN Mathematics E xam mathematics
72
65
45
41
7th
8th
84 67
81
75
66
77
73
81
78
52
51
7th
8th
25% 0%
5th
6th
kipp passing+ kipp passing
5th
district passing+ district passing
6th
state passing+ state passing
2011–12 measures of academic progress (map)
% of Students by Quartile
reading
mathematics 17
15 41
39
14
14
29
25
40
36
14
16
15
25
spring 5th spring 6th
42
39
15 18
18
28
24
spring 7th
spring 8th
fall 5th
top quartile
alumni attainment rates
31
51
19
19
24
33
25
24
22
30
27
27
29
23
29
29
24
spring 5th
spring 6th
spring 7th
spring 8th
fall 5th
third quartile
(those who have completed 8th grade at kipp 5+ years ago)
second quartile
school N/A high graduation
bottom quartile
N/A college matriculation
kansas city, mo kipp endeavor academy | grades: 5–8 | est. 2007
22 239 number of students enrolled
1school
teachers (fte)
2700 e 18th street, suite 155b, kansas city, mo 64127 816.241.3994 www.kippendeavor.org
jacob schmitz school leader
95%
9%
11%
eligible for free/reduced price meals
77%
receiving special education services
annual student attrition rate
21% Latino 0% Other 2% Caucasian 0% Asian
African American
2012 missouri assessment program
%% ofofStudents Students
100%
communication 2012 MO R eading/E nglisarts h Language Arts E xam
mathematics 2012 MO Mathematics E xam
75%
53
50% 25% 0%
19
25
56
51 20
5th
26
28 28
29 28
6th
7th
8th
kipp advanced kipp proficient
60
56
55
54 32
31 32
5th
6th
41
31
27
7th
8th
19
district advanced district proficient
53
43
state advanced state proficient
2011–12 measures of academic progress (map)
% of Students by Quartile
reading
mathematics 21
26
29
34
21
29
32
39
28
44 fall 5th
spring 5th
spring 6th
top quartile
alumni attainment rates
11
24
18
32
42
15
20
27
20
24 31
55
spring 8th
spring 7th
third quartile
(those who have completed 8th grade at kipp 5+ years ago)
fall 5th
21
44
24 29
36
60 33 spring 5th
second quartile
school N/A high graduation
spring 6th
spring 7th
39
33 18 spring 8th
bottom quartile
N/A college matriculation
minneapolis, mn kipp stand academy | grades: 5–8 | est. 2008
17 number of
160 students
1school
teachers (fte)
enrolled
97%
1601 laurel avenue, minneapolis, mn 55403 612.287.9700 www.kippminnesota.org
24%
32%
eligible for free/reduced price meals
school leader
91%
receiving special education services
annual student attrition rate
alvin abraham
1% Latino 4% Other 4% Caucasian 1% Asian
African American
2012 minnesota comprehensive assessment
% of Students % of Students
100%
reading 2012 MN R eading/E nglish Language Arts E xam 79
75%
76
60
53
50% 25% 0%
62
56 56
60
17 5th
6th
7th
kipp exceeds standard kipp meets standard
42
62
59
35
39
7th
8th
15 5th
8th
59
38
36
36
31
21
72
71
57
mathematics 2012 MN Mathematics E xam
district exceeds standard district meets standard
6th
state exceeds standard state meets standard
2011–12 measures of academic progress (map)
% of Students by Quartile
reading
13 34
mathematics
42
11
19
36
38
24 24
47
fall 5th
46
41
spring 7th
spring spring 6th 5th
top quartile
alumni attainment rates
25
21
18
28
36
19 19
21
14
24
24
18
21
36
50 63
spring 8th
39
54
spring spring 6th 5th
41
spring 7th spring 8th
fall 5th
third quartile
(those who have completed 8th grade at kipp 5+ years ago)
second quartile
school N/A high graduation
bottom quartile
N/A college matriculation
nashville, tn kipp academy nashville | grades: 5–8 | est. 2005
1school
21 number of
332 students
teachers (fte)
enrolled
89%
3410 knight drive, nashville, tn 37207 615.226.4484 www.kippacademynashville.org
executive director
15%
14%
eligible for free/reduced price meals
randy dowell laura howarth
87%
receiving special education services
annual student attrition rate
school leader
9% Latino 0% Other 3% Caucasian 1% Asian
African American
2012 tennessee comprehensive assessment program
%% ofofStudents Students
100%
reading 2012 T N R eading/E nglis h Language Arts E xam
85
75% 50%
2012 T N Mathematics E xam mathematics
49 49
68
60 45 47
57 44
37
47
45
40
48
39
45
56
52 36
43
39
45
55
60
25% 0%
5th
6th
7th
5th
8th
kipp advanced kipp proficient
district advanced district proficient
6th
7th
End–of–Course E OC
state advanced state proficient
2011–12 measures of academic progress (map)
% of Students by Quartile
reading
12
mathematics
23
28
31
34
34
25
fall 5th
19
13
13
18
25
24
33
30
35
27 43
spring 5th spring 6th
41
31
alumni attainment rates
(those who have completed 8th grade at kipp 5+ years ago)
19
25
22
53
42
45
25
48
fall 5th
third quartile
22
16
51
spring 7th spring 8th
top quartile
25
16
second quartile
high school N/A graduation
spring spring 6th 5th
spring spring 7th 8th
bottom quartile
N/A college matriculation
oklahoma city, ok kipp reach college preparatory | grades: 5–8 | est. 2002
13 number of
269 students
1school
teachers (fte)
enrolled
75%
1901 ne 13th street, oklahoma city, ok 73117 405.425.4622 www.kippreach.org
11%
26%
eligible for free/reduced price meals
school leader
79%
receiving special education services
annual student attrition rate
tracy mcdaniel
10% Latino 3% Other 7% Caucasian 1% Asian
African American
2012 oklahoma core curriculum tests reading %% ofofStudents Students
100% 75% 50%
2012 OK R eading/E nglis h Language Arts E xam 100 100 99 77
2012 OK Mathematics E xam 98 97 96
79
75
69
68
mathematics
52
55
56
61
5th
6th
7th
8th
63
71
70
70
68
57
54
52
53
5th
6th
7th
8th
25% 0%
kipp advanced kipp satisfactory
state advanced state satisfactory
district advanced district satisfactory
2011–12 measures of academic progress (map)
% of Students by Quartile
reading
mathematics 60
27
26
40
51
11
11 26
31
32
26 17
31
69
24
spring 5th
40 20 14
33
40
28
27
33
29
27
28
36
35
fall 5th
spring 5th
spring spring 7th 8th
spring 6th
fall 5th
top quartile
alumni attainment rates
third quartile
(those who have completed 8th grade at kipp 5+ years ago)
second quartile
school 96% high graduation
48 17 spring spring 7th 8th
15 spring 6th
bottom quartile
college 80% matriculation
san diego, ca kipp adelante preparatory academy | grades 5–8 | est. 2003
17 number of
359 students
1school
teachers (fte)
enrolled
99%
1475 sxth avenue, san diego, ca 92101 619.233.3242 www.kippadelante.org
school leader
12%
12%
eligible for free/reduced price meals
christa coleman
85%
receiving special education services
annual student attrition rate
8% African American 1% Other 6% Caucasian 1% Asian
Latino
2012 california standards test english arts Arts E xam 2012 C A language R eading/E nglish Language
mathematics 2012 C A Mathematics E xam
% %ofof Students Students
100%
69
75% 50%
67
63
69
59
54
43
42
62
68 66
60
59
68 65 51
61
66
55
58
52
43
53 49
25% 0%
5th
6th
7th
5th
8th
kipp advanced kipp proficient
district advanced district proficient
6th
7th
8th
state advanced state proficient
2011–12 measures of academic progress (map)
% of Students by Quartile
reading
mathematics 18 11
14
20
13
28
36
11 23
27
29
31
37
32
19 12
38 19
22
15
27
27
42
46
25 41
fall 5th
37
alumni attainment rates
fall 5th
third quartile
(those who have completed 8th grade at kipp 5+ years ago)
second quartile
school 88% high graduation
21
29
23
26
18
26
18
33
spring 8th
spring spring 7th spring 6th 5th
top quartile
12
39
spring 6th
spring 5th
spring 7th
36
spring 8th
bottom quartile
college 72% matriculation
st. louis, mo
kipp inspire academy | grades: 5–8 | est. 2009
23 number of
331 students
1school
teachers (fte)
enrolled
89%
2647 ohio avenue, st. louis, mo 63118 314.865.0855 www.kippstl.org
executive director
13%
17%
eligible for free/reduced price meals
kelly garrett
98%
receiving special education services
annual student attrition rate
jeremy esposito school leader
0% Latino 0% Other 1% Caucasian 0% Asian
African American
2012 missouri assessment program communication 2012 MO R eading/E nglisarts h Language Arts E xam
mathematics 2012 MO Mathematics E xam
% of Students % of Students
100% 75%
52
50%
30
28 29
25% 0%
51
5th
44 27
29 25
6th
7th
5th
district advanced district proficient
67
39
24
kipp advanced kipp proficient
57
55
55
60
27
29
6th
7th
state advanced state proficient
2011–12 measures of academic progress (map)
% of Students by Quartile
reading
mathematics 12 29
37
21
25
48
fall 5th
19
20
25
33
38
35
16
11 35
25
top quartile
alumni attainment rates
30
25
24
27
51
22 18 17
30
12 18 spring spring 5th spring 7th 6th
43 15
32
spring 7th
spring 5th spring 6th
fall 5th
third quartile
(those who have completed 8th grade at kipp 5+ years ago)
second quartile
school N/A high graduation
bottom quartile
N/A college matriculation
tulsa, ok
kipp tulsa college preparatory | grades: 5–8 | est. 2005
25 number of
324 students
1school
teachers (fte)
enrolled
85%
1661 east virgin street, tulsa, ok 74106 918.925.1580 www.kipptulsa.org
14%
9%
eligible for free/reduced price meals
school leader
95%
receiving special education services
annual student attrition rate
andrew mcrae
1% Latino 4% Other 0% Caucasian 0% Asian
African American
2012 oklahoma core curriculum tests
%% ofofStudents Students
100% 75% 50%
reading 2012 OK R eading/E nglis h Language Arts E xam 60
69
68 49
75
72
55 54
58
6th
7th
mathematics 2012 OK Mathematics E xam
79 64 62
59
80
71
70
70
52
59 55
52
5th
6th
7th
77
68 47
25% 0%
5th
8th
kipp advanced kipp satisfactory
district advanced district satisfactory
8th
state advanced state satisfactory
2011–12 measures of academic progress (map)
% of Students by Quartile
reading 14
mathematics 16
31
39
19
21
36
24
fall 5th
22 16 29 29
15 36
22
19
21
38
30
24
17
25 34
25 26
spring spring 5th spring 7th 6th
top quartile
alumni attainment rates
31
spring 8th
third quartile
(those who have completed 8th grade at kipp 5+ years ago)
47
fall 5th
40
37
17
16
40
41
23
25
20
18
spring spring 7th 8th
spring 5th spring 6th
second quartile
school N/A high graduation
bottom quartile
N/A college matriculation
appendix data definitions and methodology
In order to provide a full picture of the achievements of the KIPP network, the KIPP Foundation collects a wide range of information from each locally-run KIPP school. The Report Card features data for our schools that were open in 2011-12 aggregated by each of our KIPP geographic sites. The following categories explain the data presented in the preceding pages. Demographic data is accurate as of November 2012 (2012–13 school year) while achievement data, student attrition, and teacher retention reflect the 2011–12 school year.
enrollment
The Report Card provides enrollment figures for each school. In November 2012, there were more than 41,000 students in 125 KIPP schools.
student demographics
The Report Card displays graphically the percentage of students who qualify for the federal free and reduced price meals program (a proxy for family income), the race/ethnicity percentages by city, and the percentage of students defined as having special needs, as of November 2012. In the Report Card, we define special needs students as those who have Individualized Education Plans (IEPs) or are otherwise defined by the school as having special needs. In consultation with parents and other school staff, a special needs teacher prepares an IEP document that outlines the learning goals for the students and the ways in which the school will accommodate and support the student’s special needs. Percentages for student demographics may not add up to 100 due to rounding.
student attrition
The Report Card features student attrition data from the 2011–12 school year. KIPP defines attrition as the percentage of students who leave a school (for reasons other than completing the highest grade) in one annual cycle between October 1 of one year and October 1 of the following year, which is the date that most states close their enrollment. The National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) also uses this date when referencing enrollment for a given year. Network-wide statistics are based on all 109 schools open in 2011–12.
student achievement— state exams
Like all other public schools, students enrolled at KIPP schools are required under state and federal law to take exams, the results of which are used for state accountability purposes. The state tests profiled in this Report Card are criterion-referenced exams, which means that the content reflects the academic standards set by each state. The Report Card provides school-level achievement data for each subject matter test required by the state to fulfill the reporting requirements of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act, and compares the percent of students within a class that pass the test with state and district passing rates for each subject test. We also report 2012 state ratings or designations when these results are available and applicable. Some states, but not all, use such a system for rating schools. These tests do
not measure growth over time. Note: End-of-Course tests are subject tests taken by students in multiple grades.
student achievement— nationally normreferenced exams
All KIPP students take norm-referenced achievement exams in reading and mathematics from second grade through eighth grade. Normreferenced tests allow us to track the performance of students while enrolled in KIPP as compared to their grade-level peers nationally. They also provide a way to monitor student achievement longitudinally and to see the progress our students are making on the road to college. The average American student who takes a nationally norm-referenced exam will score at the 50th percentile. This student is outperforming five out of ten students nationally. From one year to the next, the average student will make one year of growth and not gain any percentile ranks, meaning that he or she will stay at the 50th percentile from year to year. If a student’s percentile increases on a nationally norm-referenced exam from year to year, it means that the student has made more than one year of growth relative to his or her peers. Across the network, almost all our schools use of the Measures of Academic Progress (MAP) test, while in the past the Stanford Achievement Test (SAT-10) has been the primary norm-referenced test. Due to this transition, we provide a snapshot of growth rather than a representation of long-term growth. The norm-referenced tests graphs on each school’s page depict the percentage of students in each percentile range (1–24, 25–49, 50–74, 75–99) on the norm-referenced test that were administered during the 2011–12 school year. In order to provide a growth measurement as well, we also report the percentage of students who made one year or more of academic progress between fall and spring of the 2011–12 school year. Percentages for normreferenced tests may not add up to 100 due to rounding. The 2011 Report Card reflected NWEA’s 2008 norms, while this year’s Report Card reflects 2011 norms. Changes between the 2011 Report Card and the 2012 Report Card may be due to changes in norms rather than to changes in performance.
attainment data— high school graduation and college matriculation
The Report Card features high school graduation and college matriculation data at the regional and school level.
college matriculation among high school graduates. For KIPP high schools with senior classes, the Report Card also includes Advanced Placement and college entrance exam (ACT and SAT) participation and performance data for graduating seniors, as well as district and state benchmarks where available. All graduation, matriculation, and exam data was tracked and verified by the region or school in the fall of 2012 and maintained within KIPP’s alumni database. Accompanying state and district data is collected through official state, district, and test company sources as noted.
teacher retention
The education community lacks a common standard for defining and reporting teacher retention. The National Center for Education Statistics defines all cases in which a teacher stops teaching at a particular school as turnover, regardless of whether a teacher switches schools, moves into a non-teaching position within his or her current school, or leaves the field of education altogether. KIPP adopts this framework, defining “retained within position” as cases where a teacher who is teaching at a school in one school year continues teaching at the same school as of the fall (September 1) of the following year. Any teacher who begins teaching at a school during the academic year (September 1 to April 30), regardless of whether he or she joined at the beginning, middle, or end of the year, is considered part of the denominator that is utilized in calculating “retained within position” rates. At the same time, because KIPP is a rapidly growing network of schools, many KIPP teachers leave to teach at another KIPP school or transition to a nonteaching capacity within the KIPP network. Current KIPP teachers are an important source for future KIPP leaders, which is why we also report “retained within KIPP,” a metric that counts these teachers as staying within the KIPP Team and Family. We only calculate retention metrics when we have at least two schools per city reporting. Note that teacher counts reflect the 2012-13 school year, and that they represent full-time equivalency (FTE) as the sum of full-time and parttime teachers.
sources “Family Income and Unequal Educational Opportunity 1970 to 2011,” Postsecondary Education OPPORTUNITY no. 245 (November 2012) Richard Fry and Kim Parker, Record Shares of Young Adults Have Finished Both High School and College (Washington, D.C.: Pew Research Center, 2012). Christina Clark Tuttle, Brian Gill, Philip Gleason, Virginia Knechtel, Ira Nichols-Barrer, and Alexandra Resch, KIPP Middle Schools: Impacts on Achievement and Other Outcomes (Washington, D.C.: Mathematica Policy Research, Inc., 2013).
We are thankful for the support of the individuals and organizations that have partnered with the KIPP Foundation to make a difference in the lives of more than 41,000
At a regional level, we report graduation and college matriculation data for eighth-grade completers (of KIPP Middle Schools) five years after completing the eighth grade.
children across the country, proving what is possible in public education. For a list of supporters of the KIPP Foundation, please see www.kipp.org/honor-roll. For the KIPP Foundation’s 2011–12 audited financials, visit
At the school level, we report four-year high school graduation among 9th grade starters and
www.kipp.org/support.
John Fisher, Chairman President, Pisces, Inc.
Richard Barth, President CEO, KIPP Foundation
Katherine Bradley President, CityBridge Foundation
Philippe Dauman President and CEO, Viacom, Inc.
Mike Feinberg KIPP Co-Founder
Doris Fisher Founder, Gap Inc. and Co-Founder, KIPP Foundation
Reed Hastings Founder and CEO, Netflix, Inc.
Rhonda Kalifey-Aluise Executive Director, KIPP New Orleans
Martha Karsh Founder, Karsh Family Foundation
David W. Leebron President, Rice University
Dave Levin KIPP Co-Founder
Michael L. Lomax President and CEO, UNCF
Mark Nunnelly Managing Director, Bain Capital
Carrie Walton Penner Trustee, Walton Family Foundation
José H. Villarreal Senior Advisor, Akin Gump
---------------
Shawn Hurwitz, Founding Board Member, Emeritus President and CEO, MAXXAM Property Company
Don Fisher, Founding Board Chair, Emeritus September 3, 1928–September 27, 2009 Founder, Gap Inc. and Co-Founder, KIPP Foundation
ARKANSAS
KIPP STRIVE Academy
NEW YORK
KIPP Austin Vista Middle School
KIPP Blytheville College Preparatory School
KIPP STRIVE Primary
KIPP Academy Elementary
KIPP TRUTH Academy
KIPP Delta College Preparatory School
KIPP Vision Academy
KIPP Academy New York
KIPP 3D Academy
KIPP Delta Collegiate High School
KIPP WAYS Academy
KIPP AMP Academy
KIPP Academy Middle School
KIPP Infinity Charter School
KIPP Coastal Village Middle School
ILLINOIS
KIPP Infinity Elementary School
KIPP Coastal Village Primary School
CALIFORNIA
KIPP Ascend Middle School
KIPP NYC College Prep High School
KIPP Courage College Prep
KIPP Adelante Preparatory Academy
KIPP Ascend Primary School
KIPP STAR College Prep Charter School
KIPP DREAM Prep
KIPP Bayview Academy
KIPP Create Middle School
KIPP STAR Elementary School
KIPP Explore Academy
KIPP Washington Heights
KIPP Generations Collegiate
KIPP TECH Valley
KIPP Houston High School
KIPP Delta Elementary Literacy Academy
KIPP Bridge Charter School KIPP Heartwood Academy
INDIANA
KIPP King Collegiate High School
KIPP Indianapolis College Preparatory
KIPP San Francisco Bay Academy
KIPP Intrepid Preparatory School KIPP Legacy Preparatory School
NORTH CAROLINA LOUISIANA
KIPP Charlotte
KIPP Summit Academy
KIPP Believe College Prep
KIPP Gaston College Preparatory
KIPP PEACE Elementary School
KIPP Academy of Opportunity
KIPP Believe Primary
KIPP Gaston College Preparatory Primary
KIPP Polaris Academy for Boys
KIPP Comienza Community Prep
KIPP Central City Academy
KIPP Pride High School
KIPP SHARP College Prep Lower School
KIPP Empower Academy
KIPP Central City Primary
KIPP LA College Preparatory School
KIPP McDonogh 15 Middle
KIPP SHINE Prep OHIO
KIPP Philosophers Academy
KIPP McDonogh 15 Primary
KIPP Journey Academy
KIPP RaĂces Academy
KIPP New Orleans Leadership Academy
KIPP Scholar Academy
KIPP New Orleans Leadership Primary
OKLAHOMA
KIPP Renaissance High School
KIPP Reach College Preparatory
COLORADO
KIPP Liberation College Prep
KIPP San Jose Collegiate
KIPP Sharpstown College Prep KIPP Spirit College Prep KIPP Sunnyside High School KIPP Voyage Academy for Girls
KIPP Tulsa College Preparatory
KIPP ZENITH Academy KIPP Aspire Academy
KIPP Denver Collegiate High School
MARYLAND
KIPP Camino Academy
KIPP Montbello College Prep
KIPP Harmony Academy
PENNSYLVANIA
KIPP Un Mundo Dual Language Academy
KIPP Sunshine Peak Academy
KIPP Ujima Village Academy
KIPP DuBois Collegiate Academy
KIPP University Prep
KIPP Philadelphia Charter School DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
MASSACHUSETTS
KIPP Philadelphia Elementary Academy
KIPP DC: AIM Academy
KIPP Academy Boston
KIPP West Philadelphia Preparatory
KIPP DC: College Preparatory
KIPP Academy Lynn
KIPP DC: Discover Academy
KIPP Academy Lynn Collegiate
KIPP DC: Grow Academy
TENNESSEE KIPP Academy Nashville
KIPP DC: Heights Academy
MINNESOTA
KIPP Memphis Academy Middle
KIPP DC: KEY Academy
KIPP Stand Academy
KIPP Memphis Collegiate Elementary School
KIPP DC: Lead Academy
KIPP Memphis Collegiate High School
KIPP DC: LEAP Academy
MISSOURI
KIPP DC: Promise Academy
KIPP Endeavor Academy
KIPP Memphis Collegiate Middle School
KIPP DC: WILL Academy
KIPP Inspire Academy
FLORIDA
NEW JERSEY
KIPP Austin Beacon Prep
KIPP Impact Middle School
Newark Collegiate Academy
KIPP Austin College Prep
KIPP VOICE Elementary School
Rise Academy
KIPP Austin Collegiate
SPARK Academy
KIPP Austin Comunidad
GEORGIA
TEAM Academy
KIPP Austin Connections Elementary
KIPP Atlanta Collegiate
THRIVE Academy
TEXAS KIPP Austin Academy of Arts & Letters
KIPP South Fulton Academy