ก ก . . ก ก
ก ก ก !" ก # ก $% &"' " ( )# ( # ( $% & # ' " "ก # " ' * " $%ก( + , -)+ & ' #. !" ก # $% ก( / . , " ' ก #)-% 0 1"
• * 2)"ก 3 1. 2. 3. 4.
-%) !ก 5 " ' & " # ' " "ก ( -) ' ) ) ก # ' ก # ( -) ' ) 1" $% !" ' + & !" -%) !ก $ # $ # & " ' ก # $% "! ก # " ' * " -%) !ก " ก # 2,) ก$% ก # ' ก # 2, " $ " $%) 3+ & + , & " , -%) ' ก # ก . 2 1 ) & "0 & " ( ก . , < + ' " -)'##' $%+ , "+ , & " ,
3 &" -%) # "ก ( " -%) # "ก # ก "' "ก -%)5$1'3" ก ( " &) , 3 )#' ,# -%) .3 ก$% ก #"# -%)#)ก ก ( " "ก . , + , # # -%)2 "ก -%) ( "ก &) -%)" -) " # "ก
• 5 2)"ก 3 1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
< -%)" -)2)"ก # )" / . ก . ,# ก 5& . , , # , " + , # # => -)) . ก ( " 2)" "ก 5& . ,+ ,2,) ?!%" < $% $ & ( # & " $% ก$% 2,)" ) & " $% ,)" 3 3 " 5& 5$1. , @ ( >2)"' & "ก ( #ก&) " -%) 5& 'ก, => . ก -)ก "ก + ,2,) *) ก #3 ก , ## ก 2,)3( ก ' => & "0 . ก B # " -%) ( # " "ก
â&#x20AC;˘ / 2)"ภ1. '#&" 3 &" 2)"ภ'#&"+ , < 2 / -) 1.1 ภ-%) # " -)ภภ, , (formative evaluation) 1.2 ภ-%) -)ภ(summative evaluation) 2. ภ'#&" ภ! . ภ'#&"))ภ+ , 2 / -) 2.1 ภ! " < ภ(goal-based evaluation) 2.2 ภ$%) + & ! " 2)" "ภ(goal-free evaluation)
3. ภ'#&" ( # $% '#&"))ภ+ , 3 / -) 3.1 ภ&) % "ภ(ex-ante evaluation) 2 1 $1 ภ3 . 3 -%)" (1) 2)" "ภ(2) ภ)#' 3 ภภ( "ภ(return of investment) (3) ภ!ภ' ภ!" 5 -) %" $%) 33 ภ3 ภภ( "ภ1 (consequence analysis) 3.2 ภ. & "ภ( " (on-going evaluation) 3.3 ภ"ภ( " (ex-post evaluation) (1) ภ( " 2)" "ภ# 3 &" $%ภ( + , $ ". (2) ภ( " $ ) + ,) & ")-% )ภ-)3 ภ$% # + ,. " #, " -)+ & (3) < ภ2)"ภ( " "ŕ¸
• '##ก '##ก -) ก )#' -)'##' . ก $% ' ". , @ !" ก $% -)ก # ก 2)"ก '## '##ก % + '#&"))ก < 3 ก & – ก & $% 1 '##ก $% , 3 &" (objective based model) – ก & $% 2 '##ก $% , ก & (judgemental evaluation model) – ก & $% 3 '##ก $% , ก .3 (decision-oriented evaluation model)
" $ '##ภ"ภ2)" ( ภ"# ?!%" < '## &" , " $ '##2)"ภ1" 3 '## " $1 1. ภภ# ภ(process evaluation) -)ภ/ (efficiency evaluation) ?!%" < ภ!ภ/ 2)" . 4 + ,'ภ& 5 " 5 " / 5 " ' 5 " , )" ,) ภ#3 ภoutputs " activities activities <---------- outputs 2. ภ"ภ(project evaluation) -)ภ(effectiveness evaluation) < ภ-%) 1 "ภ(postproject evaluation) $% , ภ(effectiveness) -) (outcome) outputs <---------- outcome 3. ภภ# (impact evaluation) 3 , ภ$%+ , # &) -%)"3 ภ2)" "ภoutcome ----------- > impact
• ก # ก 1.
"ก $% &" : ) + 1.1 "ก $ < ) & "+ . ( ( + ,)" ( "ก $1 ( ' , + ,) + ) 3 กก ' 2)" "ก 1.2 ก 2)" "ก < "ก )" "ก 3( $% ( ก &) -%)" -) "ก < , 1.3 " ' * 2)" "ก -)) + 5 3 B # + , -)+ & 1.4 '##ก # "ก < ) & "+ ,# "ก $. #, " $# ก ' )" ก $% ก$% 2,)"ก # "ก -)+ & 1.5 ก 2)" "ก $) + #, " . -) & " . < , # "# 1.6 $ก 3ก -1) ' 2 1 ) . ก ( "ก ) & "+ 1.7 "ก % , ' 1 -%). 1.8 $ก ก( ก ` . ก ( @32)" "ก -)+ & , $ ก ` ) & "+ 1.9 "ก $ $ ". . -%)"2)" 5 3 * " ' < + + ,2)" "ก
2. กก ' 2)"ก : ( + 3!" ,)" 3. ก ก( " 2)"ก : -%)) + 4. !ก ' b c$ ' ' "ก : $' b c$) + #, " 5. ก ))ก'##ก : 3 + ,) & "+ 6. -%)" -) $%.5,. ก : -%)" -) $%.5,. ก $) + #, " 7. ก ก@# # 2,) : 3 ก@# # 2,) + , , $ก . 8. ก 2,) : 3 2,) . , $ + ,) & "+ 9. " ก : 3 ( ก + .5,+ ,) & "+
â&#x20AC;˘ ภ` $%.5,. ภ1. ภ` (effectiveness) 2. ภ` / (efficiency) 3. ภ` ) $ " (adequacy) 4. ภ` < (equity) 5. ภ` ภ)# )" (responsiveness) 6. ภ` (appropriateness)
• ก / ' 2)" / / )"+ ,. '"& & "0 " $1 3 ` )-1))( (2542) 1. / . '"& 2)" & .5,3& -) , ก (input) 5& ก .5, ก 1" " $ $% $) &) & " , & ' ก ก > $ ,) $% 2. / . '"& 2)"ก # ก # (process) 5& ก ( " $% ก ,)" + , @ ' .5, $% ก # ก & 3. / . '"& 2)" 5& ก ( " $% $ / ก 5 &) " ก ก( + , B # " $3 ( !ก $% $ )& ก ( " ' # < $% & ).32)" ก ,
2)" 1. !" $% % 2!1 . 2 $% ก , . , " $% 2. !" ก 3 & 2)"ก ( " $% ( @3 & " ,)"ก -) $% ก + , 3. < ก 3 & ก 3ก ( " + , # ( @3 " * $% "+ , -)+ & ' &3 + & 3 !" ก $%.5,+ & ก ,) $ ". 4. < (return) -) * 2)")" ก 5. ก ( " !" $%+ , #3 กก ( " 3 ก # ).32)" , $%+ , ## ก " ก 3 ' ก( + 3 กก ( ก 3
â&#x20AC;˘ ' ภ& "2)" / ' " 1 / (efficiency) -) $% ( . , ภ. ภ( " 3 !" =33 ( 2, (input) ' ภ# ภ(process) -%). , ภ(output) " $%+ ,ภ( + , . 2 $% (effectiveness) -) ภ$ # $ # & " " (objective) ภ# 2)" "ภ(outcome) ?!%" !" #2)" ภ# " $%+ , 1"+ , & " , 2)" "ภ1 0 & + , " $% 1"+ , $ "+ ?!%" / ' $ ภ$% 2,)"ภ# '
â&#x20AC;˘ ' ภภ# â&#x20AC;&#x201C; ภ# (impact) < $% ภ2!1 / " 1 "ภ' , 5& " !%" -) < $% ภ2!1 &) -%)"3 ภ2)" "ภ-) 2)" "ภภ&). , ภ)-% 0 ?!%" < $% + , # + ,. " -) * 2)" "ภâ&#x20AC;&#x201C; ภภ# ภ0 -) ภ# , ภ3 (economic impact) ภ# , " (social impact) ' ภ# , %"' ,) (environment impact)
1.
ภ# , ภ3 (economic impact) 1.1 "ภ/ (physical capital) 1) 2) 3)
(fixed asset) , " , " -1 (infrastructure asset) $% 1( e + , ' ##
1.2 -) "ภ" (financial capital) 1.3 $%+ & 3 # ,)"+ , "ภ/ ' & ), " 5 + ,. ) (intangible capital) 1) ภ& $% $ภ3 #$ -) & < " 5& # (patents) 2 f (copyright) -%)" ภ, (trade mark) $% ,) (brand) "ภ, (franchise) 2) /, / =>> (knowledge and wisdom) 3) j (culture) 4) ภ' ภ/ 2)" (skills) 5) ภ# 3 ภ$% $ (good governance)
2. ภ# , " (social impact) 3. ภ# , %"' ,) (environment impact)
ก # ก ' ))ก'## Evaluation Procedures and Designs
Evaluation Designs Design 1: The True Control Group, Pretest-Posttest Design Time 1 (Pre) Experimental Group R 0 X Control Group R 0
2 (Post) 0 0
Table for reporting results N Pretest Posttest Mean SD t-test of Mean SD t-test of difference difference E-group C-group
Design 2: True Control Group, Posttest-Only Design Time 1 (Pre) Experimental Group Control Group
R R
X
2 (Post) 0 0
Table for reporting results Posttest E-group C-group (*p
N Mean SD
t-test
-
--*
---
-
) The t-test in the table can be one of two types.
Design 3: Non-Equivalent Control Group, Pretest-Posttest Design Time Experimental Group Control Group
1 (Pre) 0 0
X
2 (Post) 0 0
Table for reporting results N
E-group C-group
Pretest Posttest Mean SD t-test of Mean SD t-test of difference difference
Design 4: The Single Group Time Series Design Time 1 Experimental Group 0
2 0
3 0
4 0
X
5 0
6 0
Example: A table of time series data Mean Scores of the E-Group on the Outcome Measure Time
E group mean score
Before program Jan Feb Mar 20 25 30
After program Jan Feb Mar 50 55 60
Example: A graph drawn from data in the table. Program X 60 -
x x
50 -
x
40 30 20 -
x x x
10 Time Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
June
Graph A: trend change Before
After x x
Outcome Measure
x
x
x
x
x
x
Time
Program X
Graph B: level change Before
After
Outcome Measure
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
Program X
Time
Design 5: The Time Series and Non-Equivalent Control Group Design Time Experimental Group Non-equivalent Control Group
1 0 0
2 0 0
3 4 0 X 0 0 0
5 0 0
6 0 0
Design 6: The Before-and-After Design Time Experimental Group
1 (Pre) 0
X
2 (Post) 0
Table for reporting results N Mean Pretest Mean Posttest SD t-test of difference E-group
Design 7: The Non-Equivalent Group-Posttest Only Design Time 1 (Pre) Experimental Group Control Group
X
2 (Post) 0 0
Table for reporting results Posttest SD T-test of difference
N Mean E-group C-group
-
---
-