2
VOL. 2 ISSUE 12 AUGUST 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM
VOL. 2 ISSUE 12 AUGUST 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM
3
FEATURED
4
10
MH17, THE WAR IN UKRAINE, AND THE BID TO SAVE BRETTON WOODS
16
GEORGE SOROS AND THE SHADOW PARTY
32
Former Border Agent: Gov’t Using Immigrant Children For ‘Asymmetrical Warfare’
50
How the NSA Stasi Surveillance State Conducts War Against Alternative Media
W RITTEN BY KU RT NI M M O
W RITTEN BY KU RT NI M M O
W RITTEN BY A DA N SA L A ZA R
W RITTEN BY KU RT NI M M O
VOL. 2 ISSUE 12 AUGUST 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM
46
W RITTEN BY PAUL C R A IG R OB E R TS
24
Obama & Neocons Get Ball Rolling On World War III
WRITTEN BY PAU L JO SEPH WATSO N
48 52
WRITTEN BY M I CHAEL SNY DER
W RITTEN BY IN FOWA R S STA F F
30
Mexican Flag-Wearing La Raza Militants Arrive in Murrieta
54
W RITTEN BY PAUL J OS E P H WATS ON
38
Gun Confiscation Begins in New York?
Veteran Arrested at Gunpoint for Legal Open Carry
57
Obama Attacks Second Amendment with Executive Order W RITTEN BY KU R T N IM MO
MOTHER JAILED, KID TAKEN BY SOCIAL SERVICES AFTER PLAYING AT PARK UNSUPERVISED WRITTEN BY ST EVE WATSO N
60
W RITTEN BY MIKA E L TH A L E N
42
U.S. Govt. Editing Wikipedia to Smear Independent Media Personalities? WRITTEN BY PAU L JO SEPH WATSO N
W RITTEN BY PAU L J OS E P H WATS ON
40
The Worst Trolls On The Internet Are The Government Trolls
VOLUME 2 ISSUE 12 AUGUST 2014
Petition: Let’s Put Up “Unaccompanied” Illegals at White House
Crazed Abortion Advocate Attacks Peaceful Pro-Lifers WRITTEN BY PAU L JO SEPH WATSO N
W RITTEN BY KUR T N IM MO
28
Homeland Security, Feds Swarm Small Town in Bizarre Unannounced Show of Force
CONTENTS
20
Guilt By Insinuation: How American Propaganda Works
Poll: Majority Reject Obama Policies Because They’re Bad, Not Because Of Racism WRITTEN BY ST EVE WATSO N
63
Big Corporations Have An OVERWHELMING Amount Of Power Over Our Food Supply WRITTEN BY M I CHAEL SNY DER
44
Armed Homeland Security Agents In ‘Community Outreach’ To “Let People Know They’re In The Area” W RITTEN BY PAUL J OS E P H WATS ON
AUG UST 2014 The August, 2014 edition of The Infowars Magazine has a wide range of articles, which collectively present an alternate viewpoint than that being pushed by the presstitute media. Featured, are stories involving the Obama administration’s flaky explanation for the downing of Malaysian flight MH-17 and the increasingly imminent threat of criminal illegal aliens flooding American cities. The growing surveillance state that tramples everyone’s constitutional rights, and the continuing assault on the 2nd Amendment are more examples of topics covered in this month’s Issue of The Infowars Magazine.
VOL. 2 ISSUE 12 AUGUST 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM
55
SIGHTINGS SUBMIT YOUR PHOTOS, QUOTES, MEMES, LETTERS, AND POLITICAL ILLUSTRATIONS TO GRAPHICS@INFOWARS.COM
6
VOL. 2 ISSUE 12 AUGUST 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM
QUOTES “A Man Should Look For What Is, And Not For What He Thinks Should Be.”
ALBERTEINSTEIN
“I will never apologize for the United States — I don’t care what the facts are…” Commenting on the Navy warship USS Vincennes having shot down Iran Air Flight 655 in a commercial air corridor on July 3, killing 290 civilians
“The Very Act Of Observing Disturbs The System.”
“The Difference Between A Democracy And A Dictatorship Is That In A Democracy You Vote First And Take Orders Later; In A Dictatorship You Don’t Have To Waste Your Time Voting.”
GEORGE H.W. BUSH WERNER HEISENBERG CHARLES BUKOWSKI
VOL. 2 ISSUE 12 AUGUST 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM
7
A BOUT A LEX JONES
A SHORT STORY A B OUT US Infowars Magazine was founded as a monthly publication in 2012 as the answer to the eminent threat of internet censorship. The first issue debuted in september 2012, bringing the fight for the infowar to a new front, the changing landscape of print media. Over 100,000 copies are distributed world-wide each month, spreading truth journalism with the passion of grassroots publication and the permanence of physical print. Our distribution points across the globe continue to grow and our subscriptions increase as people like you take the infowar to the streets, providing magazines to stores, restaurants, businesses, and neighborhoods. Take a stand against tyranny and join the front lines in the fight for freedom.
The Alex Jones Show is a nationally syndicated news/talk show based out of Austin, TX. The show is syndicated by the Genesis Communication Network on over 160 AM and FM radio stations across the United States, and has a large internet based audience.
SOCIAL SITES: Facebook.com/AlexanderEmerickJones Twitter: @RealAlexJones Youtube.com/TheAlexJonesChannel
INFOWARS.COM
PRISONPLANET.COM
PLANETINFOWARS.COM
WWW.PRISONPLANET.TV
Home of the #1 Internet news show in the world.
Reporters on the scene, articles, and special coverage.
Instantly connect to what’s most important to you. Follow your friends, experts, favorite celebrities, and breaking news.
Get access to all the channels: The Alex Jones Show, Nightly News, Exclusive Video Reports, 60+ Movies and Documentaries, Books, and more.
8
VOL. 2 ISSUE 12 AUGUST 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM
LISTEN TO T H E AL E X J ON E S S H OW You can listen to the show on-demand over the internet, either when the show is on the air (Mon-Fri, 11:00 a.m.—2:00 p.m CST and Sunday from 4:00.—6:00 PM CST) or you can stream a feed of the latest show at www.infowars.com/show
CONTRIBUTION CONTRIBUTING WRITERS
PUBLISHER Alex Jones
MANAGING EDITOR Kelen McBreen
ART DIRECTOR Rob Reeger
GRAPHICS & PHOTOGRAPHY Molly Rogers Rob Reeger
Paul J. Watson Kurt Nimmo Kit Daniels Adan Salazar Steve Watson Mac Slavo Daniel Taylor Michael Snyder
PROJECT MANAGER
CHECK OUT INFOWARSSHOP.COM Check out Infowars gear, exclusive Alex Jones Movies, Infowars Magazine, health and wellness, preparedness products, and more.
C O N TA C T U S letters@infowars.com graphics@infowars.com
Tim Fruge
EDITORIAL ASSISTANT Kit Daniels
SINGLE ISSUES and bulk orders are available online at www.infowarsstore.com or through customer service at 1-888-253-3139 • ADVERTISING inquiries can be directed to 512-646-4414 or advertising@ infowars.com • INFORMATION requests, whether general or editorial, can be found by contacting letters@infowars.com • Infowars Magazine is published by Free Speech Systems, LLC. 12 times a year with a circulation of 90,000 copies. All content within this magazine is copyright of Free Speech Systems, LLC. To receive a free electronic version of the magazine, become an Infowars Insider by signing up at www.infowars.com/newletter • PERMISSION to reprint original Infowars articles in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given. Some articles are copyrighted by our contributing writers, so check to see if copyright-free status applies. The articles appearing within this publication reflect the opinions and attitudes of their respective authors and not necessarily those of the publisher, advertisers, or editorial team.
VOL. 2 ISSUE 12 AUGUST 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM
9
Mh17, The War In Ukraine, And The Bid To Save Bretton Woods Ukraine Represents The Frontline Of The Globalist War To Oppose The Growing Economic Influence Of Russia And China.
I
n order to understand what is currently going on Ukraine as well as the roles played by the United States and Russia we have to examine the Maidan Nezalezhnosti protest in Kiev that began in November, 2013. Protests against the Ukrainian government began after President Viktor Yanukovych did not sign an Association Agreement and a Free Trade Agreement with the European Union and instead forged closer economic ties with Russia. For NATO and the West this event represented the betrayal of a plan designed “to completely split Ukraine from Russia, and place it in the perilous position of being in the middle of any east-west confrontation,” explains Carla Stea. It represented a “military agreement disguised as a customs and economic agreement.”1 Prior to the rejection Russia threatened trade restrictions if the agreement was approved by the Verkhovna Rada, the Ukrainian parliament. Moreover, members of the parliament and Ukrainian Prime Minister Mykola Azarov opposed “the extremely harsh conditions” of an IMF loan presented by the IMF on November 20.2 Conditions for the loan included large budget cuts and a 40% increase in gas bills for average Ukrainians. The IMF said a Russian offer to rescue Ukraine with $15 billion in loans and deep discounts on natural gas prices represented a perilous choice. It chastised Ukraine for spending money on “pension and wage increases, generous energy subsidies and soccer cup spending” and demanded the implementation of draconian budget cuts and austerity measures.3
10
Nulandistan Ukraine’s drift away from the European Union and the International Monetary Fund required a Plan B. This was soon organized by the State Department and its NGO partners and associates which included indispensable help by the seasoned color revolution virtuoso, George Soros. In May, following the successful coup in Ukraine, Soros told CNN’s Fareed Zakaria he was responsible for establishing a foundation in Ukraine that ultimately contributed to the overthrow of the country’s elected leader and led to the installation of the junta. In February as pro-EU protests against the decision by the Yanukovych government grew in Maidan Nezalezhnosti (Independence Square), the Russians covertly recorded a phone conversation between Victoria Nuland, the U.S.-Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs, and Geoffrey R. Pyatt, the U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine. Nuland told Pyatt she ordered the Under-Secretary-General and head of the Department of Political Affairs at the United Nations, Jeffrey Feltman, to have U.N. boss Ban Ki-moon get Dutch diplomat Robert Serry “glue this thing,” in other words arrange a political configuration acceptable to the United States, the European Union, the IMF and NATO and disadvantageous
to Russia. During the recorded conversation Nuland voiced her displeasure with clumsy efforts by the European Union to replace Yanukovych by stating: “fuck the EU.”4 Nuland and the State Department supported the muscle of the Maidan movement – a neofascist group, Right Sector, and other nationalist groups acting as enforcers and later as a violent vanguard to the revolution. Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said in May that Nuland had meetings with the Right Sector in Washington, DC. “The other thing to which I wanted to get response from Washington was these reports about the secret visit of the Right Sector coordinator (Andrei) Artyomenko to Washington for alleged meetings with Victoria Nuland. And we want answers to these questions because it’s too serious to manipulate events in Europe across the Atlantic. It’s not a remote-control game. It’s very serious for us.” Lavrov said.5 It was, as well, deadly serious for the United States and the European Union. After the Euromaidan revolt reached a fever pitch in February and Yanukovych fled for his life, 110 civil victims of the coup were identified. Nearly all were conflict participants. In addition, 18 police officers were killed.6 “Wherever the US government says it is promoting democracy and freedom, as US Assistant-Secretary of State Victoria Nuland professes about Ukraine, there has been destruction, impoverishment, sectarianism, fighting, and death. Welcome to post-coup Ukraine or Nulandistan,” writes Mahdi Darius Nazemroaya.7
VOL. 2 ISSUE 12 AUGUST 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM
A Win for Bankers and the IMF Following the fall of Yanukovych a government was cobbled together in Kiev consisting of Batkivshchyna, the Ukrainian Democratic Alliance for Reform, Svoboda, the Economic Development and Sovereign European Ukraine group, and other assorted members of the parliament. The Batkivshchyna was led by Yulia Tymoshenko, a corrupt politician who had served time in prison for abuse of power and embezzlement. The Ukrainian Democratic Alliance for Reform, headed up by retired Ukrainian professional heavyweight boxer and the WBC world heavyweight champion emeritus Vitali Klitschko, billed itself as anti-corruption and pro-EU. Svoboda is a Ukrainian nationalist political party, formerly the Social National Party of Ukraine. Svoboda party leader Oleh Tyahnybok is infamous for delivering a speech calling for Ukrainians to fight against a “Muscovite-Jewish mafia.”8 The Economic Development and Sovereign European Ukraine group was formed after the coup and calls for integration with the European Union and lustration, or purging of former government members. The reshuffled parliament voted to appoint Arseniy Yatsenyuk as the new prime minister. Yatsenyuk is a member of Yulie Tymoshenko’s Fatherland Party. He is a millionaire former banker who served as economy minister, foreign minister and parliamentary speaker before Yanukovych took office in 2010. Yatsenyuk immediately entered into consultation with the IMF and the US Treasury Department fol-
lowing the coup. Treasury Secretary Jacob Lew informed IMF Managing Director Christine Lagarde “that he had spoken earlier in the day with Ukrainian leader Arseniy Yatsenyuk and advised him of the broad support for an international assistance package centered on the IMF, as soon as the transitional Ukrainian government is fully established by the Parliament... Secretary Lew also noted that he had communicated to Mr. Yatsenyuk the need to quickly begin implementing economic reforms and enter discussions with the IMF following the establishment of the transitional government,” MNI News reported on February 24, 2014.9 Yatsenyuk was an ideal appointment to oversee the IMF agenda in Ukraine. His foundation, “Open Ukraine,” works closely with the US State Department, the National Endowment for Democracy, NATO, Chatham House, Horizon Capital, Swedbank, and the German Marshall Fund. The Chatham House is a British think tank operating similarly to the Council on Foreign Relations and the Brookings Institute in the United States. Corporate members include Goldman Sachs International, Morgan Stanley, Lockheed Martin, Bloomberg, GlaxoSmithKline, CocaCola, and other transnational corporations and financial interests. This elite membership, writes Tony Cartalucci, “is involved in coordinated planning, perception management, and the execution of its corporate membership’s collective agenda.”10 “We all know about the important military consequences of controlling Ukraine to the US and Russia,” the Zero Hedge website noted in March, “but an equally important and overlooked topic is why bankers want control of Ukraine’s monetary supply and ultimately control of Ukraine through controlling its debt (the proposed $1 billion loan from the IMF). All major Western military invasions in the past several years – Somalia, Sudan,
Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya and attempts in Syria – involved countries in which the Bank for International Settlements had not yet gained control of the monetary supply at the time of these invasions.” The international banking cartels represented by the World Bank, the IMF and the Bank for International Settlements are unhappy with their low level of influence in controlling the debt of emerging economic powers like China and Russia and know that they very well can’t directly declare war on Russia and China to effect regime change in order to obtain control of their debt as they accomplished with the aforementioned much smaller countries that didn’t have the military strength to withstand a US/EU/ banking led invasion. However, these global banking cartels know that they can gain influence through regime change without direct military intervention in the 15 newly independent states of the former USSR a la John Perkin’s Confessions of an Economic Hit Man (or at least this was their first initial thought in Ukraine).11
Crimea and Eastern Ukraine: IMF Coup Hits a Speed Bump The ethnic composition of Ukraine made it difficult for the financial elite micromanaging the coup through its handpicked “transition government” to consolidate gains and impose its economic agenda. Following the appointment of Oleksandr Turchynov as interim president in late February and Andriy Parubiy, the cofounder of Svoboda, was named Secretary of the Security and National Defense Committee, considerable resistance to the coup regime spread in regions of
VOL. 2 ISSUE 12 AUGUST 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM
11
the country where there is an ethnic Russian majority. Separatist sentiment began initially in the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the administratively separate municipality of Sevastopol but eventually spread to Donetsk, Luhansk, Odessa and other oblasts where there is a significant minority of ethnic Russians. Crimea, part of Russia until it was transferred to Ukraine by Soviet premier Nikita Khrushchev, held a referendum on joining Russia. The Crimean status referendum was held on March 16, 2014. The official turnout was 83% and resulted in an overwhelming vote (over 95%) in favor of annexation. The vote was not recognized and subsequently condemned by the United States, the European Union and the coup government is Kiev. The following day, on March 17, the Crimean Parliament declared independence and asked to join the Russian Federation. On March 18 Russia and the Crimean government signed a treaty of accession and the Republic of Crimea and Sevastopol were merged into the Russian Federation. Ten days later, on March 27, the United Nations General Assembly passed a non-binding resolution declaring the Crimean referendum invalid and the incorporation of Crimea into Russia illegal. The following month, after accusations Russia had engineered the annexation, President Vladimir Putin admitted Russia had played a role. “Of course, Russian servicemen backed the Crimean self-defense forces,” Putin said during his annual televised meeting to the nation.12
Coup Government Launches “AntiTerror” Operation In Response To Separatists 12
Pro-Russian and anti-NATO and EU protests in eastern Ukraine were a common occurrence prior to the February coup in Kiev. For instance, in 2006, there was a protest and riot in the Ukrainian port city of Feodosiya that partially disrupted a joint Ukrainian-US military exercise. Following the coup, ethnic Russians in Ukraine’s eastern most region held demonstrations calling for a referendum like the one held in Crimea. They also called for disarming the Maidan revolution self-defense units, primarily the nationalist and neofascist Right Sector, and also called for outlawing of Svoboda and the Ukrainian National Assembly-Ukrainian People’s Self-Defense organization, a nationalist group aligned with Right Sector. Ethnic Russians have long feared Ukrainian nationalists. The late Aleksandr Muzychko, a notorious nationalist leader who led Right Sector until his assassination, had once promised to fight against “communists, Jews and Russians.”13 In the Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts, commonly known as the Donbass, rallies were held and government buildings occupied in response to the coup in Kiev. In Donetsk separatists gained control of local the Regional Administration. “We don’t want to give our money any more to Kiev. We want more freedom for our city in a new federation or confederation that allows us to embrace the friendly ties and positive feelings towards us of the people of Russia,” the elected governor of a declared people’s government, Pavel Gubarev, told reporters.14 Gubarev was later arrested by the Security Service of Ukraine for “advocating separatism” and “illegal seizure of power.” The Security Service is under the National Security and Defense Council of Ukraine, an advisory state body headed up by Andriy Parubiy, who led the U.S. State Department
micromanaged Euromaidan revolution. He co-founded the neofascist Social-National Party of Ukraine with Oleh Tyahnybok. By April separatists from the declared Donetsk Republic had occupied government administration buildings and police stations in Donetsk, Kramatorsk, Druzhkivka, Horlivka, Mariupol and Yenakiieve. The actions resulted in Ukrainian transitional president Oleksandr Turchynov launching a full-scale “anti-terrorist” operation in eastern Ukraine to reclaim the lost government buildings. The German newspaper Bild-Zeitung reported at the time the FBI and the CIA worked with the coup government to put down the growing revolt. Despite this assistance, the operation ran into trouble after protesters seized Ukrainian armored vehicles in Kramatorsk and turned back coup soldiers in Sloviansk. The situation escalated into a military conflict in May when a second “anti-terror” operation, launched by the coup government, resulted in the downing of two military helicopters and casualties on both sides. Fighting raged across the Donetsk Oblast – in Donetsk, Sloviansk, Horlivka, Luhansk, and other cities – as the government tried to regain control and defeat the anti-coup separatists. “Fighting between the Ukrainian Army and armed groups in the eastern regions of Donetsk and Luhansk has increased in regularity and intensity as the government in Kiev seeks to assert its authority, and has led to a growing number of civilian casualties, the United Nations reported, noting that separatist groups have acknowledged that their ranks include fighters from Chechnya, a Russian republic, and elsewhere in the Caucasus,” The New York Times reported in June.15 The newspaper said at least 356 people had thus far died in the conflict.
VOL. 2 ISSUE 12 AUGUST 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM
A planned referendum was held on May 11 despite a request by Putin to delay it. The results were overwhelmingly in favor of self-rule, according to the Donetsk People’s Republic.
Election of Poroshenko and the War On Separatism On June 7 acting president Oleksandr Turchynov was replaced by billionaire confectionery magnate Petro Poroshenko, aka the Chocolate King. According to the Central Election Commission of Ukraine, Poroshenko received 54.7% of the vote cast on May 25. “My first presidential trip will be to Donbass,” he declared after the polls closed.16 “We have to do everything we can to ensure no more Ukrainians die at the hands of terrorists and bandits. These criminal acts by the enemies of the Ukrainian people will not go unpunished,” he added.17 A week after the election information surfaced indicating Poroshenko had earlier collaborated with the U.S. State Department and was being groomed for a future role. “Two diplomatic messages from the WikiLeaks Public Library on U.S. Diplomacy indicate that newly elected President of Ukraine, Petro Poroshenko was an agent for United States State Department. A confidential message from the U.S. Embassy in Kiev on April 29, 2006 mentions the newly elected Ukraine president twice,” Michael Collins reported on June 13.18 On June 20 Poroshenko announced a plan for peace and a week-long ceasefire with Donetsk and Lugansk People’s Republics, but this ended a few days later. “Non-renewal of the ceasefire is our response to terrorists, rebels,
looters, all those who torment the civilians, who paralyze the economy of the region, who disturb payment of salaries, pensions, stipends, who undermines the railroads, destroys water pipes, those who deprive people of normal peaceful life,” Poroshenko said in an address to the nation.19 He asked for “understanding” from the people of Donetsk and Lugansk regions for his decision to renew a military assault. Residents accused the Kiev regime of indiscriminately killing civilians. In July the New York-based Human Rights Watch called on Poroshenko to investigate cases in which Ukrainian forces targeted civilians. “There has been virtually no Western media coverage concerning this human tragedy. The deaths of innocent children resulting from Kiev’s ‘counter-terrorism operation’ have been casually categorized as ‘collateral damage,’” Professor Michel Chossudovsky wrote on July 20.20 “The amount on civilian casualties is, unfortunately, greater than the military ones,” Vasily Lazoryshynets, the deputy health minister in Kiev told ITAR-TASS on July 10. “In the area of the operation in eastern Ukraine, 478 civilians have died, including 30 women and seven children.”21
Taking the Conflict to the Next Level: Malaysia Airlines Flight 17 The establishment media insists without credible evidence that Russia and the separatists are responsible for the downing of Malaysia Airline Flight 17 on July 17, 2014. However, as a number of observers note, the official explanation now accepted as bedrock truth in the United States, Europe and
much of the rest of the Western world does not add up. As former Rep. Ron Paul noted a few days after the crash, the story proffered by the establishment media makes no sense. “The media has reported that the plane must have been shot down by Russian forces or Russian-backed separatists, because the missile that reportedly brought down the plane was Russian made. But they will not report that the Ukrainian government also uses the exact same Russian-made weapons,” Paul writes.22 “They will not report that neither Russia nor the separatists in eastern Ukraine have anything to gain but everything to lose by shooting down a passenger liner full of civilians.” Andrew McKillop, a former technology expert for the European Commission and the United Nations, writes for Market Oracle that a “violent and bizarre” false flag war is currently being waged in Ukraine. “As we know, today, the US political stance on the Ukrainian civil war is of outright hostility towards Russia and the pro-Russian rebels, called ‘terrorists’, of eastern Ukraine who seek independence from Kiev and do not recognize the Kiev government,” he writes. While there is no certainty the pro-Russian rebels hold advanced SAM air defense weapons, they are certainly in the hands of the Kiev flash mob government, alongside the advanced AAM weapons they also “inherited” from the elected government they overthrew. The onus of military proof is stacked against the Kiev, leaving only the question of political motive or motives for the incident. The motive for this cynical and criminal act – destroying a civil jetliner – underscores the role of “false flags” to rouse and manipulate public opinion in the supposedly “neutral” US and the EU28 countries. Drawing their political leaderships into
VOL. 2 ISSUE 12 AUGUST 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM
13
the next – international – phase of the Ukrainian civil war is “logical” for the Kiev flash mob government given its lack of success, either military or political, in obtaining full control of separatist regions in eastern Ukraine. Cynically destroying a large civil airliner and killing nearly 300 people is, to be sure, “war logic” but as the 1915 Lusitania incident showed, these incidents can spark a one-way process to all-out international war.23 “The key question remains, of course, cui bono? Only the terminally brain dead believe shooting a passenger jet benefits the federalists in Eastern Ukraine, not to mention the Kremlin,” writes journalist Pepe Escobar. “As for Kiev, they’d have the means, the motive and the window of opportunity to pull it off – especially after Kiev’s militias have been effectively routed, and were in retreat, in the Donbass; and this after Kiev remained dead set on attacking and bombing the population of Eastern Ukraine even from above.”24 Escobar mentions the obvious fact – entirely ignored by the corporate media – that the “MH17 tragedy happened two days after the BRICS announced an antidote to the IMF and the World Bank, bypassing the US dollar.” In other words, the incident has all the telltale signs of a false flag event designed to salvage the Bretton Woods system and the dollar hegemony that has ruled the world since the end of the Second World War. MH17 is a propaganda set piece designed to demonize Russia and damage its economic relations with Europe. Ukraine represents the frontline of a battle in the war to oppose the growing economic influence of Russia and China. Attacking BRICS is at the center of this desperate effort to retain a crumbling and
14
corrupt Bretton Woods monetary and global control scheme. For the financial elite, accustomed to large wars and millions of dead, a mere 283 passengers and 15 crew murdered on an airplane en route from Amsterdam to Kuala Lumpur is a small price to pay.
VOL. 2 ISSUE 12 AUGUST 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM
SOURCES
8. Stern, David. “The Rise of Ukraine’s
811904579583413180447156.
Ultra-Nationalists,” BBC News, December 25, 1.Stea, Carla. “The UN Says the Ukrainian
2012. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/maga-
17. “‘Terrorists and Bandits’ Will Be Pun-
People Must Decide Their Fate, NATO Wants
zine-20824693.
ished,
Something Else.” Global Research. http://www.
Vows
Ukraine’s
Poroshenko.”
France
24, May 30, 2014. http://www.france24.com/
globalresearch.ca/the-un-says-the-ukrainian-
9. Nimmo, Kurt. “Central Banker Appointed as
e n / 2 0 1 4 0 5 3 0 - u k r a i n e - p o ro s h e n ko - h e l i c o p -
people-must-decide-their-fate-nato-wants-some-
Prime Minister of Ukraine.” Infowars, February
ter-downing-terrorists-bandits-pro-russia/.
thing-else/5362936.
27, 2014. http://www.infowars.com/centralbanker-appointed-as-prime-minister-of-ukraine/.
2. Herszenhorn, David M. “Ukraine Blames I.M.F.
18. Collins, Michael. “Our Ukraine Insider: The New President Once Agent for the US State
for Halt to Agreements With Europe.” The New
10. Cartalucci, Tony. “Naming Names: Your Real
Department.”
York Times, November 22, 2013, sec. World /
Government.” Land Destroyer, March 12, 2014.
June 13, 2014. http://www.strategic-culture.
Europe. http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/23/
http://landdestroyer.blogspot.com/2011/03/
org/news/2014/06/13/our-ukraine-insider-new-
world/europe/ukraine-blames-imf-for-collapse-
naming-names-your-real-government.html.
president-once-agent-the-us-state-department.
of-accord-with-european-union.html.
Strategic
Culture
Foundation,
html 11. “Why Bankers Want Control of Ukraine,”
3. Herszenhorn, David M. “I.M.F. Criticizes
Zero Hedge, March 5, 2014.
19. ‘We’ll Attack & Free Our Land’: Ukraine
Ukraine Plan for Economy.” The New York
http://www.zerohedge.com/contrib-
President
Times, December 19, 2013, sec. Business Day
uted/2014-03-05/why-bankers-want-control-
Russia Today, June 30, 2014. http://rt.com/
/ International Business. http://www.nytimes.
ukraine.
news/169512-ukraine-poroshenko-cease-
com/2013/12/20/business/international/imf-re-
Terminates
Ceasefire
in
East.”
fire-end/.
leases-rebuke-of-ukraines-financial-strategy.
12. Ally, Kathy. “Putin’s Remarks Raise Fears of
html.
Future Moves against Ukraine.” The Washington
20. Chossudovsky, Michel. “Media Blackout:
Post, April 17. http://Washingtonian/world/
Major Military Operation in East Ukraine. 496
4. Nimmo, Kurt. “Nuland Audio Reveals State
putin-changes-course-admits-russian-troops-
Civilians, 1600 Soldiers Reported Killed.” Global
Department Role in Undermining Ukraine.”
were-in-crimea-before-vote/2014/04/17/
Research, July 20, 2014. http://www.globalre-
Infowars, February 7, 2014. http://www.
b3300a54-c617-11e3-bf7a-be01a9b69cf1_story.
search.ca/media-blackout-major-military-oper-
infowars.com/nuland-audio-reveals-state-depart-
html.
ation-in-east-ukraine-1600-soldiers-reported-
ment-role-in-undermining-ukraine/.
killed/5392193. 13. ‘I’ll Be Fighting Jews and Russians till I
5. Wright, D.S. “Victoria Nuland Accused Of
Die’: Ukrainian Right-Wing Militants Aiming
21. “Kiev Official: Military Op Death Toll Is
Meeting With Neofascists In Washington,” FDL
for Power,” Russia Today, February 22, 2014.
478
News, May 19, 2014. http://news.firedoglake.
http://rt.com/news/ukraine-right-sector-mili-
Russia Today, July 10, 2014.
com/2014/05/19/victoria-nuland-ac-
tants-210/.
news/171808-eastern-ukraine-civilians-killed/.
14. McElroy, Damien. “Ukraine Crisis: Separatist
22. Paul, Ron. “What the Media Won’t Report
in Donetsk Proclaims ‘People’s Government’,”
About Malaysian Airlines Flight MH17,” Infowars.
6. “List of People Killed during Euromaidan.”
The Telegraph, March 4, 2014. http://www.
com, July 21, 2014. http://www.infowars.com/
Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia, July 22,
telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/
what-the-media-wont-report-about-malaysian-
2014. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.
ukraine/10676785/Separatist-in-Donetsk-pro-
airlines-flight-mh17/
php?title=List_of_people_killed_during_Euro-
claims-peoples-government.html.
maidan&oldid=618043060.
15. Cumming-bruce, Nick. “U.N. Report Details
23. McKillop, Andrew. “Flight MH17 – Kiev Flash
Civilians,
Outnumbers
Army
Losses.”
http://rt.com/
cused-of-meeting-with-neofascists-in-washington/
Casualties in Eastern Ukraine.” The New York
Mob’s Last False Flag?” The Market Oracle, July
7. Nazemroaya, Mahdi Darius. “Welcome to
Times, June 18, 2014. http://www.nytimes.
18, 2014. http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Arti-
Nulandistan: A Multimedia Look at What
com/2014/06/19/world/europe/un-report-de-
cle46500.html
the US and EU Have Unleashed on Ukraine.”
tails-casualties-in-eastern-ukraine.html.
Global Research, May 12, 2014. http://www.
24. Escobar, Pepe. “It was Putin’s missile!” Asia
globalresearch.ca/welcome-to-nulandistan-a-
16. Sonne, Paul. “Poroshenko Declares Victory in
Online, July 18, 2014. http://www.atimes.com/
videographic-essay-of-what-the-us-and-eu-have-
Ukraine Presidential Election.” Wall Street Jour-
atimes/Central_Asia/CEN-01-190714.html
unleashed-on-ukraine/5381838.
nal, May 26, 2014, sec. Europe. http://online. wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702304
VOL. 2 ISSUE 12 AUGUST 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM
15
WRITTEN BY Kurt N i m m o
16
VOL. 2 ISSUE 12 AUGUST 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM
Soros Democrats Strive To Take Down Governments And Empower Global Elite
F
rom undermining the Second Amendment and influencing elections to sponsoring color revolutions in Eastern Europe and the Middle East, the ominous footprint of George Soros is everywhere. The Hungarian-born billionaire and currency speculator who considers himself a messianic figure was voted “the single most destructive leftist demagogue in the country” by respondents to a poll published by the Human Events newspaper in 2011. “George Soros is the most dangerous man in the world because, just like the crazy megalomaniacs in old fifties movies, he is deceiving everybody into believing that he is altruistic, when in fact, he is using his Open Society/Shadow Party to undermine the very fabric of American society,” the newspaper explained. If not for Soros’ immense wealth a sizable number of leftist organizations would be far less influential. He has fed more than $7 billion to the likes of Media Matters, ACORN, La Raza, the Huffington Post, the Southern Poverty Law Center, Planned Parenthood, the Center for American Progress, MoveOn.org and dozens of other organizations pushing a socialist and ultimately globalist agenda on the American people.
in 1998. The United Nations, the World Bank, and the International Monetary Fund are organizations he believes should be dictating economic, social and political policy. “To stabilize and regulate a truly global economy, we need some global system of political decision making. In short, we need a global society to support our global economy,” he writes in The Crisis of Global Capitalism. Individual states and national populations should not be allowed to govern their own economic affairs – instead, this process will be accomplished by a global financial elite, according to Soros. “Given the decisive role that international financial capital plays in the fortunes of individual countries, it is not inappropriate to speak of a global capitalist system,” he writes in Open Society: Reforming Global Capitalism Reconsidered. For Soros and the financial elite nations that fall under their control are democracies while those beyond their reach are autocratic, totalitarian and abusive of human rights. “It is a historical fact that the countries that constitute the center of the global capitalist system are democratic but the same is not true of all the capitalist countries that lie on the periphery,” Soros explains. “Rulers are reluctant to relinquish Dismantling national sovereignty their power; they need to be pushed.” is at the top of the Soros list. “Insofar as there are collective interests that transcend state boundaries, the Since the early 1980s Soros has sovereignty of states must be sub- used his immense wealth and influordinated to international law and ence to “build vibrant and tolerant international institutions,” he said democracies whose governments
are accountable to their citizens,” in other words, governments answerable to the financial elite. Following the fall of the Soviet Union, Soros played an instrumental role in moving former satellite nations into the globalist fold. “From 1979, he distributed $3 million a year to dissidents including Poland’s solidarity movement, Charter 77 in Czechoslovakia and Andrei Sakharov in the Soviet Union,” writes Neil Clark. “In 1984, he founded his first Open Society Institute in Hungary and pumped millions of dollars into opposition movements and independent media. Ostensibly aimed at building up a ‘civil society’, these initiatives were designed to weaken the existing political structures and pave the way for eastern Europe’s eventual exploitation by global capital. Soros now claims with characteristic immodesty, that he was responsible for the ‘Americanization’ of eastern Europe.” In 2000, following a NATO bombing campaign, Soros began his color revolution push in Serbia. His color revolution NGOs ran the Slobodan Milosevic opposition. “The Yugoslavs remained stubbornly resistant and repeatedly returned Slobodan Milosevic’s reformed Socialist Party to government. Soros was equal to the challenge. From 1991, his Open Society Institute channeled more than $100 million to the coffers of the anti-Milosevic opposition,” Clark explains. After Milosevic fell and was sent to stand trial for war crimes before the internationalist court at the Hague, “Serbia, under the auspices of Sorosbacked ‘reformers’” became “less,
VOL. 2 ISSUE 12 AUGUST 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM
17
not more, free,” Clark writes. The Serbian people were subject to the standard round of globalist economic medicine as Soros “copied a pattern he has deployed to great effect over the whole of eastern Europe of advocating ‘shocking therapy’ and ‘economic reform’, then swooping in with his associate to buy valuable state assets at knock-down prices.” Soros repeated the pattern in neighboring Georgia where funds from his Open Society Institute funded the so-called Rose Revolution that threw out Eduard Shevardnadze and installed former justice minister Mikhail Saakashvili. Georgian activists were tutored by the Sorosbacked Serbian Otpor (Resistance) movement on how to use peaceful revolution to topple a government disfavored by the international elite. Georgian Foreign Minister Salomé Zourabichvili told the French journal Hérodote that Soros’ NGOs were not only responsible for toppling Shevardnadze, but had subsequently become an integral part of the resulting governmental power structure. A few years later Soros would employ the tactics sharpened in Eastern Europe to foment the Arab Spring in the Middle East and Africa. “The Soros center’s job in eastern Europe is nearly finished. Its main focus now is the Islamic world, Arab countries, Turkey, Pakistan, Afghanistan, etc,” The Open Society Institute consultant Dr. Kian Tajbakhsh told Iranian officials following his arrest for trying to undermine the government. In Egypt the color revolution turned blood red and managed to ultimately install a military dictatorship after a cobbled together plan to have a Muslim Brotherhood puppet rule the country failed. The Muslim Brotherhood has served for decades as an asset of U.S. and British intel-
18
“Individual states and national populations should not be allowed to govern their own economic affairs – instead, this process will be accomplished by a global financial elite”
ligence. Violence also ruled in Ukraine when a group of fascists selected by the U.S. State Department overthrew the country’s democratically elected president. In May George Soros told CNN’s Fareed Zakaria he is responsible for establishing an NGO in Ukraine that ultimately contributed to the overthrow of Viktor Yanukovych and the installation of a junta. “Many of the participants in Kiev’s ‘EuroMaidan’ demonstrations were members of Soros-funded NGOs and/or were trained by the same NGOs in the many workshops and conferences sponsored by Soros’ International Renaissance Foundation (IRF), and his various Open Society institutes and foundations. The IRF, founded and funded by Soros, boasts that it has given ‘more
than any other donor organization’ to ‘democratic transformation’ of Ukraine,” writes William F. Jasper. The “democratic transformation” of Ukraine has resulted in ethnic cleansing and may soon serve as a pivot for World War III.
The lesson Soros learned in 1989 when he used his wealth to install Vaclav Havel in the Czech Republic is that elections and preferred candidates can be bought with due diligence and a lot of money. In the United States he has donated substantial amounts of cash to Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, Charles Rangel, Al Franken, Tom Udall, Joe Sestak, and Sherrod Brown in a determined effort to transform America.
VOL. 2 ISSUE 12 AUGUST 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM
During the 2004 election cycle he donated “$23,581,000 to various liberal 527 Groups dedicated to defeating President George W. Bush. Soros contributed $3 million to the leftist propagandist Center for American Progress and $5 million to radical leftist MoveOn.org,” according to Conservapedia. The so-called “Shadow Party” – conceived by Soros, Hillary Clinton and Harold Ickes – sidestepped reforms put in place by Senators John McCain and Russ Feingold and donated millions in soft money to the Democrat Party. “Without Soros and the Shadow Party, Barack Obama would be, at best, a senator from Illinois attending social gatherings with domestic terrorists Bill Ayers, Bernardine Dohrn and sitting in the pews of black liberation theologist
Reverend Jeremiah Wright,” notes Human Events. “At worse, he’d be an unremarkable and unheard of state senator. Instead, Barack Obama is the President of the United States.” The cozy personal relationship between Obama and Soros dates back to 2004 when Obama ran for the Senate and became Soros’ “Chosen One.” He was selected by the “Phoenix Group” – a confab of wealthy Democrat donors – and was guided through the Senate and ultimately installed in the White House. “Obama has the charisma and the vision to radically reorient America in the world,” Soros said in 2007 after he sent the Senator from Illinois the maximum individual contribution allowed by campaig finance law.
Due to hubris and arrogance Soros and the Shadow Party did not consider the degree of popular resistance they would encounter after Obama became president. From the tea party to a fresh crop of libertarian-minded Republicans, there is a growing surge within America to defeat the globalists and diminish the influence and control of George Soros and the globalist ilk. The path ahead, however, will be a difficult one. Soros is one player and there are others maneuvering behind the scenes to destroy the sovereignty of the United States and systematically dismantle the bulwarks standing in the way of realizing a New World Order.
VOL. 2 ISSUE 12 AUGUST 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM
19
WRITTEN BY PAUL CRAIG ROBERTS
Guilt By Insinuation: How American Propaganda Works Why Hasn’t Washington Joined Russian President Putin In Calling For An Objective, Non-Politicized International Investigation By Experts Of The Case Of The Malaysian Jetliner?
T
he Russian government continues to release facts, including satellite photos showing the presence of Ukrainian Buk anti-aircraft missiles in locations from which the airliner could have been brought down by the missile system and documentation that a Ukrainian SU-25 fighter jet rapidly approached the Malaysian airliner prior to its downing. The head of the Operations Directorate of Russian military headquarters said at a Moscow press conference on July, 21 that the presence of the Ukrainian military jet is confirmed by the Rostov monitoring center. The Russian Defense Ministry pointed out that at the moment of destruction of MH-17 an American satellite was flying over the area. The Russian government urges Washington to make available the photos and data captured by the satellite. President Putin has repeatedly stressed that the investigation of MH-17 requires “a fully representative group of experts to be working at the
20
site under the guidance of the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO).” Putin’s call for an independent expert examination by ICAO does not sound like a person with anything to hide. Turning to Washington Putin stated: “In the meantime, no one [not even the “exceptional nation”] has the right to use this tragedy to achieve their narrowly selfish political goals.” Putin reminded Washington: “We repeatedly called upon all conflicting sides to stop the bloodshed immediately and to sit down at the negotiating table. I can say with confidence that if military operations were not resumed [by Kiev] on June 28 in eastern Ukraine, this tragedy wouldn’t have happened.” What is the American response? Lies and insinuations. On July, 20 the US Secretary of State, John Kerry confirmed that pro-Russian separatists were involved in the downing of the Malaysian airliner and said that it was “pretty clear” that Russia was involved. Here are Kerry’s words: “It’s pretty clear that this is a system
that was transferred from Russia into the hands of separatists. We know with confidence, with confidence, that the Ukrainians did not have such a system anywhere near the vicinity at that point and time, so it obviously points a very clear finger at the separatists.” Kerry’s statement is just another of the endless lies told by US secretaries of state in the 21st century. Who can forget Colin Powell’s package of lies delivered to the UN about Saddam Hussein’s “weapons of mass destruction” or Kerry’s lie repeated endlessly that Assad “used chemical weapons against his own people” or the endless lies about “Iranian nukes”? Remember that Kerry on a number of occasions stated that the US had proof that Assad crossed the “red line” by using chemical weapons. However, Kerry was never able to back up his statements with evidence. The US had no evidence to give the British prime minister whose effort to have Parliament approve Britain’s participation with Washington in a military attack on Syria was voted down. Parliament told
VOL. 2 ISSUE 12 AUGUST 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM
As There Are A Number Of Possible Explanations, Let’s Keep Open Minds And Resist Washington’s Propaganda Until Facts And Evidence Are In. All Washington Has Shown Us So Far Are Accusations And Insinuations. If That Is All Washington Continues To Show Us, We Will Know Where The Blame Resides. the prime minister, “no evidence, no war.” Again here is Kerry declaring “confidence” in statements that are directly contradicted by the Russian satellite photos and endless eye witnesses on the ground. Why doesn’t Washington release its photos from its satellite? The answer is for the same reason that Washington will not release all the videos it confiscated and that it claims prove that a hijacked 9/11 airliner hit the Pentagon. The videos do not support Washington’s claim, and the US satellite photos do not support Kerry’s claim. The UN weapons inspectors on the ground in Iraq reported that Iraq had no weapons of mass destruction. However, the fact did not support Washington’s propaganda and was ignored. Washington started a highly destructive war based on nothing but Washington’s intentional lie. The International Atomic Energy Commission’s inspectors on the ground in Iran and all 16 US intelligence agencies reported that Iran had no nuclear weapons program. However, the fact was inconsistent with Washington’s agenda and was ignored by both the US government and the presstitute media. We are witnessing the same thing right now with the assertions in the absence of evidence that Russia is responsible for the downing of the Malaysian airliner. Not every member of the US government is as reckless as Kerry and John McCain. In place of direct lies, many US officials use insinuations.
US Senator Diane Feinstein is the perfect example. Interviewed on the presstitute TV station CNN, Feinstein said: “The issue is where is Putin? I would say, ‘Putin, you have to man up. You should talk to the world. You should say, if this is a mistake, which I hope it was, say it.’” Putin has been talking to the world nonstop calling for an expert non-politicized investigation, and Feinstein is asking Putin why he is hiding behind silence. We know you did it, Feinstein insinuates, so just tell us whether you meant to or whether it was an accident. The way the entire Western news cycle was orchestrated with blame instantly being placed on Russia long in advance of real information suggests that the downing of the airliner was a Washington operation. It is, of course, possible that the well-trained presstitute media needed no orchestration from Washington in order to lay the blame on Russia. On the other hand, some of the news performances seem too scripted not to have been prepared in advance. We also have the advanced preparation of the youtube video that purports to show a Russian general and Ukrainian separatists discussing having mistakenly downed a civilian airliner. As I pointed out earlier, this video is twice damned. It was ready in advance and by implicating the Russian military, it overlooked that the Russian military can tell the difference between a civilian airliner and a military airplane. The existence of the video itself implies that there was a plot to down the airliner and
blame Russia. I have seen reports that the Russian anti-aircraft missile system, as a safety device, is capable of contacting aircraft transponders in order to verify the type of aircraft. If the reports are correct and if the transponders from MH-17 are found, they might record the contact. I have seen reports that Ukrainian air control changed the route of MH-17 and directed it to fly over the conflict area. The transponders should also indicate whether this is correct. If so, there clearly is at least circumstantial evidence that this was an intentional act on the part of Kiev, an act which would have required Washington’s blessing. There are other reports that there is a divergence between the Ukrainian military and the unofficial militias formed by the right-wing Ukrainian extremists who apparently were the first to attack the separatists. It is possible that Washington used the extremists to plot the airliner’s destruction in order to blame Russia and use the accusations to pressure the EU to go along with Washington’s unilateral sanctions against Russia. We do know that Washington is desperate to break up the growing economic and political ties between Russia and Europe. If it was a plot to down an airliner, any safety device on the missile system could have been turned off so as to give no warning or leave any telltale sign. That could be the reason a Ukrainian fighter was sent to inspect the airliner. Possibly the real target was Putin’s airliner and
VOL. 2 ISSUE 12 AUGUST 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM
21
incompetence in implementing the plot resulted in the destruction of a civilian airliner. As there are a number of possible explanations, let’s keep open minds and resist Washington’s propaganda until facts and evidence are in. At the very least Washington is guilty of using the incident to blame Russia in advance of the evidence. All Washington has shown us so far are accusations and insinuations. If that is all Washington continues to show us, we will know where the blame resides.
22
In the meantime, remember the story of the boy who cried “wolf!” He lied so many times that when the wolf did come, no one believed him. Will this be Washington’s ultimate fate? Instead of declaring war on Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Somalia, and Syria, why did Washington hide behind lies? If Washington wants war with Iran, Russia, and China, why not simply declare war? The reason that the US Constitution requires war to begin with a declaration of war by Congress is to prevent the executive
branch from orchestrating wars in order to further hidden agendas. By abdicating its constitutional responsibility, the US Congress is complicit in the executive branch’s war crimes. By approving Israel’s premeditated murder of Palestinians, the US government is complicit in Israel’s war crimes. Ask yourself this question: Would the world be a safer place with less death, destruction and displaced peoples and more truth and justice if the United States and Israel did not exist?
VOL. 2 ISSUE 12 AUGUST 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM
VOL. 2 ISSUE 12 AUGUST 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM
23
Obama & Neocons Get Ball Rolling On World War III Treasury Dept. And U.N. Sanctions On Russia Tantamount To Declaration Of War WRITTEN BY KURT NIMMO
24
VOL. 2 ISSUE 12 AUGUST 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM
O
bama, Hillary Clinton, the State Department, John McCain and others in government have reached the conclusion Russia was behind the deadly attack on a Malaysian airliner in Ukraine. They reached this conclusion 24 hours after the attack and before an investigation had yet to begin. The neocon wing of the establishment is ready to begin the process of blaming Russia and start the process of punitive sanctions. “I think we could bring this to the U.N. and start the ball rolling,” Stephen Black, a Russia fellow at the American Foreign Policy Council, told USA Today. “Not just the Security Council, but the General Assembly, where Russia can’t veto it. There are more economic tools. We did not simply block them from doing dollar-denominated transactions.” The AFPC is aligned with the American Enterprise Institute, the Center for Security Policy and other neocon advocacy groups responsible for the invasion and occupation of Iraq. Meanwhile the Atlantic Council, a NATO think tank staffed by an array of insiders like Henry Kissinger and Brent Scowcroft, is calling for additional sanctions slapped on Russia. Damon Wilson, who served as a Russia and Ukraine expert in the administrations George W. Bush and
Bill Clinton and now works for the Atlantic Council, says the U.S. government and the European Union should crank up “sanctions that bite, along with military assistance, including lethal military assistance” the fascist dominated regime installed in Kyiv by the State Department.
Expanding Sanctions Obama called Russian President Putin on Thursday. He promised additional sanctions and made suggestions on how Russia might step away from the conflict on its border. “Along with our allies, with whom I’ve been coordinating closely, I’ve repeatedly made it clear that Russia must halt the flow of weapons of fighters across the border into Ukraine, that Russia must urge separatists to release hostages, and support a ceasefire, that Russia needs to pursue internationally mediated talks and agreed to meaningful monitors on the border. I have made this clear to Mr Putin,” Obama said from the White House on Wednesday. The latest sanctions bar Russian oil giant Rosneft and the bank Gazprombank OAO from obtaining new financing in U.S. capital markets, according to The Wall Street Journal. “Because Russia has failed to meet the basic standards of international conduct, we are acting today to open
Russia’s financial services and energy sectors to sanctions and limit the access of two key Russian banks and two key energy firms to U.S. sources of financing, and to impose blocking sanctions against eight arms firms and a set of senior Russian officials,” a notice posted by the Treasury Department states. Russia “could shut down the border and prevent the transfer of heavy weapons and materiel to separatists. They have not done that. President Putin himself could intervene with pro-Russian separatists and encourage them to abide by the ceasefire. He has not done that,” said White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest. Earnest failed to mention that the confectionary magnate and current president of the regime in Kyiv, Petro Poroshenko, ended the ceasefire on July 1. He went on national television and said the coup regime would “attack and liberate our land.”
War Preparations Earlier this month the top commander of NATO, Air Force Gen. Philip M. Breedlove, announced “U.S.-based troops will buttress American forces that have already been moved in recent months from Germany, Italy and elsewhere in Europe for stepped-up ground and air patrols in the three Baltic countries
The Neocon Wing Of The Establishment Is Ready To Begin The Process Of Blaming Russia And Start The Process Of Punitive Sanctions VOL. 2 ISSUE 12 AUGUST 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM
25
of Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia, plus Poland and Romania,” according to McClatchy. The effort to go up against Russia in Ukraine was derailed when Putin “ruled out a full-frontal invasion,” as Business Insider characterized Russian defense of its border, and moved troops and equipment away from the border in May. “The force that remains on the border is very large and it’s very capable and remains in a very coercive posture,” Gen. Breedlove insisted. “With Kiev’s military campaign against fellow Ukrainians to the east faring poorly, an actual Russian invasion of Ukraine would only benefit
26
them and their backers in both the European Union and collaborating states within NATO,” Tony Cartalucci wrote on July 15. The desire by the West to portray Russia as “invading Ukraine” is rooted in the belief that it will undermine Russia’s political leverage and open the doors to more aggressive NATO support for the faltering regime in Kiev. Perceived Russian aggression might make it easier to convince NATO and EU members who have not followed suit in exacting sanctions and condemnation against Russia to begin taking a more anti-Russian stance. The downing of a Malaysian airliner,
an incident immediately exploited by the political class in Washington, will undoubtedly push “exacting sanctions” out on the fast track. “As I have mentioned before, the US has no business meddling in Ukraine or trying to push NATO up to Russia’s border,” writes investor Alex Dvorkin. “That destabilizes the entire region and that will eventually lead to some sort of a war. NATO’s presence in Ukraine would be equivalent to the Chinese or the Russians building a massive military base in Tijuana. Russia will not let that happen and it will go to war to prevent it, sanctions or not.”
VOL. 2 ISSUE 12 AUGUST 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM
VOL. 2 ISSUE 12 AUGUST 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM
27
WRITTEN BY I nfowars Staff
Petition: Let’s Put Up “Unaccompanied” Illegals at White House It’s Time Obama And Democrats Take Ownership Of The Problem
I
n response to inaction by the Obama administration and the federal government to confront the tidal wave of illegal immigrants streaming over the border into Texas, Alex Jones and Infowars have posted a petition on the “We the People” page at the White House. We demand Obama and Congress take responsibility for the unprecedented influx of so-called “unaccompanied minors” streaming across the border. Specifically, since there is no practical way at this point to prevent thousands of people daily from illegally crossing into the United States
28
– short of militarizing the southern border – we demand Obama and Congress house the immigrants in Washington DC. In order to make certain this effort does not impose additional burden on already seriously besieged American tax payers, we also demand Obama’s wealthy Democrat base pay for the housing and other needs of the impoverished illegal immigrants. Additionally, other less wealthy Democrats who insist this event is now a refugee problem should also put their money where their mouths are and donate what they can to
house and feed the children. Prior to advent of large and stifling government, social problems were addressed by individuals, churches and other private organizations through charity. It is time to relive our past and get government out of our lives. Let’s make sure Obama and the Democrats are not able to pass the buck and raid already seriously depleted federal coffers and force Americans to pay for this orchestrated effort to flood the country with dependents and undermine a shrinking middle class.
VOL. 2 ISSUE 12 AUGUST 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM
VOL. 2 ISSUE 12 AUGUST 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM
29
WRITTEN BY PAUL J OS E P H WATS ON
Mexican Flag-Wearing La Raza Militants Arrive in Murrieta Members On Site To “Protect The Children”
According to Eric Odom, the La Raza members told him they were there to “protect the children.”
A
n image posted by an activist who is protesting against the arrival of illegal immigrants in the flash point town of Murrieta shows the arrival of La Raza militants adorned with the Mexican flag. Murrieta has seen unrest since Friday as anti-illegal immigration activists clash with pro-amnesty protesters over the arrival of illegal immigrants, mainly children, from Central America. As we reported, those arrested for instigating violence against
30
both anti-illegal immigration activists and police on July 4 were all pro-amnesty agitators who described themselves as “anarchist-communist.” Despite the fact that the unrest was caused by pro-illegal groups, the federal riot police now arriving in the town have been sent ostensibly to deal with anti-immigration demonstrators. The arrival of La Raza members is only likely to enflame tensions given the organization’s radical outlook, which has been attacked by critics as divisive and racist.
La Raza, which literally translates as “the race,” has been connected to the Chicano Student Movement of Aztlan (MEChA), an extremist Mexican race hate group which firmly believes in exploiting illegal immigration to bring about ‘La Reconquista’, a violent overthrow of the southern U.S. states that would be absorbed into Greater Mexico. As Breitbart reported, La Raza activists were also out in force at a town hall meeting in Murrieta, chanting “Viva La Raza!” through a bullhorn.
VOL. 2 ISSUE 12 AUGUST 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM
VOL. 2 ISSUE 12 AUGUST 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM
31
Former Border Agent: Gov’t Using Immigrant Children For ‘Asymmetrical Warfare’ “In Other Words [The Government Is] Assisting In The Downfall Of America..” WRITTEN BY ADAN SA L A Z A R
32
VOL. 2 ISSUE 12 AUGUST 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM
B
y leaving strategic areas along the southern US border unprotected, and by using children as the face of the illegal immigrant surge to elicit public sympathy, the federal government is engaging in a sophisticated military tactic known as “asymmetrical warfare” against the American people, a former US Border Patrol agent is warning. As the government allocates resources to South Texas, it is systematically leaving areas within the US, as well as vast swaths of land along the border, unguarded, outspoken former Tucson Sector Border Patrol agent Zach Taylor says in an excerpted clip taken from an upcoming documentary entitled, “Back to the Border.” “This gives people that are trying to get their infrastructure, their personnel, their drugs, their dirty bombs, their biological weapons, their chemical weapons into the United States without being noticed” the opportunity to do so, “because this part of the border is open, it is not being controlled,” the 26-year Border Patrol veteran outlines in the extensive interview. “If asymmetrical warfare is going to be successful, the first thing that has to be done is to compromise America’s defenses against invasion,” Taylor says, “because they have to have their personnel inside the United States to affect the infrastructure.. they have to affect the degeneration from inside the United States.” The retired federal agent claims that by magnifying the mere ten percent of the influx that is actually apprehended, and by mostly centering on the one percent who are immigrant minors, the government is deliberately drawing attention away from the hundreds of thousands of illegal aliens who evade capture – who may
or may not be harboring communicable diseases, or may or may not have gang affiliations. In Central America, children as young as 10 join violent gangs, like MS-13, an intelligence report notes, and according to an FBI report, many are initiated by having to commit murder. “What the people don’t realize is that it is putting their own children at risk, because these children are going to be put in schools with their children,” Taylor says. Taylor, who also serves as Chairman of the National Association of Former Border Patrol Officers, had previously made headlines for slamming the recent immigrant wave as an Obama administration-manufactured crisis. “This is not a humanitarian crisis,” Taylor wrote in a press release last month. “It is a predictable, orchestrated and contrived assault on the compassionate side of Americans by her political leaders that knowingly puts minor Illegal Alien children at risk for purely political purposes. Certainly, we are not gullible enough to believe that thousands of unaccompanied minor Central American children came to America without the encouragement, aid and assistance of the United States Government.” Below is a transcript of the portion of the video where Taylor explains how the immigration crisis is covert asymmetrical warfare aimed at the US public. The whole idea of asymmetrical warfare is to defeat your enemy from within. It is not to attack him from without. Of course the threat comes from without, but they have to be inside of the US to effect a successful warfare strategy. If asymmetrical warfare is going to be successful, the first thing that has to be done is to compromise America’s
defenses against invasion, because they have to have their personnel inside the United States to affect the infrastructure: our hospitals, our schools, our electric grid, our power supplies our water supply – basically what we call “infrastructure.” All of those things create our infrastructure – but they have to affect the degeneration from inside the United States. The markers that we’re seeing that indicate this is “asymmetrical warfare” is because the reaction that the United States is taking is they’re taking the opportunity of inviting these illegal aliens to come here, they’re concentrating them in one place in the United States, the Rio Grande Valley, and they’re drawing the resources that are protecting the rest of the US border to care for the illegal alien children, to help with the overflow of the minors, to transport, to take care of the needs of these people while they’re in Homeland Security custody. All this takes the resources that are protecting America at the border, off of the border. So now the borders are wide open. This gives people that are trying to get their infrastructure, their personnel, their drugs, their dirty bombs, their biological weapons, their chemical weapons into the United States without being noticed because this part of the border is open, it is not being controlled. It is a perfect military strategy. It doesn’t raise any eyebrows because we’re focused on the children, but we need to focus on our children, because this is asymmetrical warfare. Everything says it is. And the way the United States government is responding to it is concealing that fact from the American people. In other words they’re assisting in the downfall of America, and you need to understand that.
VOL. 2 ISSUE 12 AUGUST 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM
33
U.S. MILITARY AND CIA IN 34
VOL. 2 ISSUE 12 AUGUST 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM
NTERVENTIONS SINCE WWII
source: william blum, killing hope: u.s. military and cia interventions since wwii, 2004 and rogue state, 2005. richard d. vogel at combatingglobalization.com
VOL. 2 ISSUE 12 AUGUST 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM
35
36
VOL. 2 ISSUE 12 AUGUST 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM
VOL. 2 ISSUE 12 AUGUST 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM
37
WRITTEN BY Paul Joseph Watson
Gun Confiscation Begins In New York? Nassau County Man: State Police “Just Came To My Home And Took Everything”
S
econd amendment activists are expressing concern that authorities in New York state have begun moving towards mass gun confiscation after a man had all his firearms seized by police over a 15-year-old misdemeanor charge. In a post on the nyfirearms.com forum entitled, “NY State Police Just Came to My Home and Took Everything,” a Nassau County man describes how he received a visit from State Police who wanted to inspect the serial number of a semi-automatic rifle he had just purchased. “I brought him to my safe, opened it and the 2nd officer went in and took out my cx4, Remington 70 sps and Remington 870 shotgun. Then he says that I had a misdemeanor possession charge 15 years ago and all the guns will be taken,” the man wrote, adding that he was put through the FBI’s National Instant Criminal Background Check System when he purchased the guns with no issues. The post elicited a huge response from other forum members who encouraged the man to get a lawyer while advising them that he shouldn’t have allowed cops to enter his home without a warrant.
38
Others said the case highlighted how “registration leads to confiscation.” The man now faces having to get permission from a judge in order to have his firearms returned. After the passage of the the NY Safe Act back in April, which was described by Governor Andrew Cuomo as the “toughest” gun control law in the United States, less than 10 per cent of residents obeyed by registering their assaultstyle weapons. Some Sheriffs publicly stated that they would not order their deputies to enforce the law, while Assembly Minority Leader Brian Kolb derided the Safe Act as “the worst piece of legislation I have seen in my 14 years as a member of the Assembly.” Protesters against the measure marked the deadline by shredding their registration cards during a demonstration in upstate New York, arguing that the law merely creates a new class of criminals out of responsible gun owners. The backlash against the NY Safe Act mirrors what happened in Connecticut, where residents were required by law to register high capacity magazines and assault rifles manufactured after 1994, yet just 13% of gun owners complied.
VOL. 2 ISSUE 12 AUGUST 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM
VOL. 2 ISSUE 12 AUGUST 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM
39
WRITTEN BY Mikael T halen
Veteran Arrested At Gunpoint For Legal Open Carry A Recently Published Cell Phone Video Out Of Wash. State Shows An Air Force Veteran Being Arrested At Gunpoint For Legally Open Carrying An Ar-15 Rifle.
T
he incident, which occurred on June 29, 2013, began when Vancouver police confronted Mack Worley as he walked down a public sidewalk towards his vehicle. “Stop right there. Put the rifle on the ground,” an officer repeats over a police vehicle loudspeaker. Worley, fearing for his safety, puts the rifle on the ground while a second officer demands he place his hands on top of his head. “Am I being detained right now officer?” Worley asks. After being forced to lift his t-shirt to prove he is not carrying a sidearm, Worley is repeatedly asked to turn off his cell phone by an Officer Rawlins. Refusing to do so, Worley again asks if he is being detained without receiving an answer. “Just so you know officer, I don’t consent to any searches or seizures of my firearm,” Worley says as officers seize his property without probable cause. Worley then begins documenting the names of the officers on scene, receiving a snide remark from a visibly unstable officer known as Her-
40
nandez. Asking again if he is being detained, Officer Hernandez admits that no criminal suspicion has been acquired. Given the fact that the mere sight of a legally carried rifle does not equate to probable cause, Hernandez’s comments reveal the stop to be completely unconstitutional. “No crimes have been committed at this point that we know of,” Hernandez says. “Maybe your gun is stolen, I don’t know.” Shortly after, an unnamed officer can be seen scattering Worley’s ammunition across the sidewalk. The officer wrongfully claims that Worley’s refusal to waive his Fourth Amendment is suspicious behavior before eerily foreshadowing the events to unfold. Attempting to return to his vehicle, Worley is ordered to leave the parking lot by Officer Hernandez, forcing him to head the opposite direction. Walking down a public sidewalk, Worley is again ordered to change his direction by a second officer. Left with no options, Worley tries to alert the officer to his vehicle’s location as he is incorrectly accused of trespassing. Boxed in with no where to go, offi-
cers suddenly converge on Worley before placing him under arrest for “trespassing with a weapon capable of producing bodily harm.” Worley’s cell phone was confiscated as “evidence” for more than a year. According to Worley, officers demanded he submit to a breathalyzer test or be put in a drunk tank once reaching the police station. In custody for four and half hours, Worley was denied access to an attorney, a phone call, water and his inhaler. The following week, Worley plead not guilty to all charges. He has since set up a legal defense fund in order to file a civil suit against the department. “This obviously isn’t just for me, it’s for everyone’s rights. If they can do this to me, they can do this to anyone,” said Worley. Last November, a similar incident captured by police dashcam revealed the arrest of an Army master sergeant as he legally open carried during a hiking trip with his son. The veteran was absurdly accused of “rudely displaying” his rifle.
VOL. 2 ISSUE 12 AUGUST 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM
VOL. 2 ISSUE 12 AUGUST 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM
41
WRITTEN BY Kurt N i m m o
Obama Attacks Second Amendment with Executive Order
Outlaws Russian-Made AK-47 Rifles With Stroke Of His Unconstitutional Pen
O
bama exploited the conflict in Ukraine to target the importation of the popular AK line of firearms manufactured by Kalashnikov Concern in Izhmash, Russia. The unconstitutional ban includes the Saiga line of rifles and shotguns. The Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) attempted to soften the blow by stating the executive order does not outlaw Kalashnikov firearms legally purchased in the United States prior to the ban. The OFAC, according to its website, “administers and enforces economic
42
and trade sanctions based on US foreign policy and national security goals against targeted foreign countries and regimes, terrorists, international narcotics traffickers, those engaged in activities related to the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, and other threats to the national security, foreign policy or economy of the United States.” The criminalization of an entire line of foreign manufactured firearms is possible under “national emergency powers” and there is no appeal process. “Many of the sanctions are based on United Nations and other international mandates, are multilateral
in scope, and involve close cooperation with allied governments,” according to the Treasury Department. “American civilians are buying as many AK47s from Russia’s top armory as the Russian military and police,” the Daily Mail reported in 2012. “The surge in sales of Russian assault rifles and shotguns are fueled by firearms enthusiasts who are paranoid about the weapons being banned in the United States.” The paranoia about the government unilaterally outlawing an entire class of firearms has now come true.
VOL. 2 ISSUE 12 AUGUST 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM
“unfortunately you’ve grown up hearing voices that incessantly warn of government as nothing more than some separate, sinister entity that’s at the root of all of our problems. some of these same voices do their best to gum up the works. they’ll warn that tyranny is always lurking just around the corner. you should reject these voices.” commencement address to The Ohio State University 2013
VOL. 2 ISSUE 12 AUGUST 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM
43
WRITTEN BY Paul J oseph Watson
Armed Homeland Security Agents In ‘Community Outreach’ To “Let People Know They’re In The Area” Feds Out In Force To Remind Residents About Snitch Program
A
rmed Homeland Security agents are now conducting “community outreach” programs based around maintaining a visible presence in order to “let people know they’re in the area.” News channel WNCT 9 received calls from alarmed residents in response to reports of numerous DHS vehicles parked outside a bankruptcy court in Greenville, North Carolina. However, the “heavy presence” was not because of any specific threat associated with the building. DHS officials told the station that armed Homeland Security agents were out in full force “as part of their community outreach to let people know that they are in the area.”
44
The feds were also present in order to remind people about the DHS’ “See Something, Say Something” domestic snitch program. The visible presence of armed federal agents for no other reason than to represent a show of force will only deepen concerns that the Department of Homeland Security is becoming America’s domestic standing army, a notion posited by the Rutherford Institute’s John Whitehead in a widely circulated article last month. “The menace of a national police force, aka a standing army, vested with so much power cannot be overstated, nor can its danger be ignored,” wrote Whitehead, before listing numerous examples of how the DHS is instrumental in pushing
America’s decline into a militarized police state. Frustration also centers around the fact that federal police are keeping themselves busy watching the American people while the country’s borders remain in a state of near chaos. As we reported recently, armed DHS agents, backed up by a Black Hawk helicopter and two armored vehicles, also staged a show of force in the small Illinois town of Livingston, all to catch one individual who is accused of downloading indecent images. The armed agents in the report out of Greenville were from the Federal Protective Service, a subdivision of the DHS. As we reported last year, Federal
VOL. 2 ISSUE 12 AUGUST 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM
Protective Service officers were hired to guard an IRS building in St. Louis during a Tea Party protest against the federal agency’s discrimination targeting conservative groups. The FPS has previously been used to spy on protesters. In 2011, the DHS asserted that it had every right to spy on peaceful protest groups and had been using Federal Protective Service (FPS) agents to do so since at least 2006. Last October, the Department of Homeland Security announced its intention to spend $80 million dollars on hiring a raft of armed guards under the auspices of the FPS to protect IRS and other government buildings in upstate New York during “public demonstrations” and “civil disturbances.”
The visible presence of armed federal agents for no other reason than to represent a show of force will only deepen concerns that the Department of Homeland Security is becoming America’s domestic standing army.
VOL. 2 ISSUE 12 AUGUST 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM
45
WRITTEN BY PAUL J O S E P H WATS O N
Homeland Security, Feds Swarm Small Town In Bizarre Unannounced Show Of Force School Field Besieged By Black Hawk Chopper, Swat Vehicles
H
omeland Security agents, backed by police SWAT teams, armored vehicles and a Black Hawk helicopter staged a bizarre unannounced show of force in front of a school in a small Illinois town, scenes which will exacerbate concerns about the increasing militarization of U.S. law enforcement. Residents of Livingston, IL., population 850, were shocked to see agents from Homeland Security, the US Customs and Border Patrol and local police agencies swarm a field belonging to a grade school yesterday, with one local telling news channel
46
KTVI, “When all the armored trucks started showing up and everything it made me kind of nervous.” One child said he thought the spectacle was “pretty cool” and that agents invited the local children to check out the choppers up close, despite the presence of weapons inside the helicopters. The school superintendent said he was not given any information about the operation beforehand, despite authorities using school land as a staging ground. The U.S. Attorney’s Office refused to release any information on the purpose behind the operation.
KTVI labeled the presence of the feds a “mystery,” although it subsequently emerged that the school was being used as a staging ground for a raid on a house three miles away. Authorities refused to divulge the purpose behind the raid or if anyone was taken into custody. Reporter Roche Madden said he learned that ten police cars showed up at the house to conduct the raid, suggesting that the Black Hawk and the armored vehicles were merely on standby. The sheer number of feds present, in addition to multiple armored vehicles, military-style choppers
VOL. 2 ISSUE 12 AUGUST 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM
The sheer number of feds present, in addition to multiple armored vehicles, military-style choppers and other vehicles, in order to conduct a raid on a single house clearly suggests overkill and will prompt more concerns as to the increasing militarization of U.S. law enforcement.
and other vehicles, in order to conduct a raid on a single house clearly suggests overkill and will prompt more concerns as to the increasing militarization of U.S. law enforcement. Authorities routinely stage unannounced drills, often in the middle of the night, which terrify startled residents. Critics have asserted that Americans are being conditioned to accept military-style policing as a routine occurrence. The purchase of armored vehicles formerly used in anti-terror operations overseas has prompted widespread concern that domestic law enforcement in the United States is becoming
increasingly militarized and violent. A recent ACLU investigation into the issue decried the fact that American neighborhoods are turning into warzones as SWAT tactics become more brutal, causing an increase in deaths, injuries and property damage. Back in May, Indiana Police Sergeant Dan Downing admitted that the militarization of domestic law enforcement was partly to deal with returning veterans who are now seen as a homegrown terror threat. A local Fox affiliate reported that the cops were now “armed for war” against such threats.
VOL. 2 ISSUE 12 AUGUST 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM
47
WRITTEN BY PAUL J OS E P H WATS O N
Crazed Abortion Advocate Attacks Peaceful Pro-Lifers
Irate Feminist: “What You Are Is A Racist Motherf**Ker As Well”
A
video shows a crazed abortion advocate physically and verbally attacking peaceful pro-lifers in downtown Columbus, OH. If the pro-choice crowd were looking for a poster child, the woman in the film certainly isn’t it. The video was shot by members of the Created Equal organization, who were staging a low key demonstration alongside two signs showing an aborted fetus. The video begins with the woman erroneously claiming that a baby at 12 weeks is just “a clump of motherfucking cells – no hands are showing at that time,” when in reality the baby has developed hands, arms, legs, ears, and eyelids at this point. “You’re some white privileged, racist, motherfucking male that doesn’t stand for women’s rights – fucking dipshit,” barks the woman before kicking in one of the group’s signs and proceeding to physically assault Seth Drayer, who was filming the incident.
48
The woman, who appears to be a Burger King employee, kicks over another sign as Drayer calls the police. “You are fucking white male privilege assholes,” screams the woman, before assaulting Drayer again. “What you are is a racist motherfucker as well,” she yells, incensed that the group would dare exercise its first amendment rights to advocate a position with which she disagrees. “Go right the fuck on ahead you fucking sexist, misogynist motherfuckers,” states the woman. “Take your male privilege somewhere else – no uterus, no right to talk about it – understand me motherfucker.” The police subsequently arrive and remove the woman from a bus. The group has filed charges against the woman. The woman’s insistence that the pro-lifers were “racist assholes” is somewhat inconsistent with the fact
that almost half of the abortions that are carried out in the United States each year result in the termination of black babies. “Violent attacks on pro-lifers are becoming more common,” Created Equal’s Executive Director Mark Harrington told Christian Newswire. “Pro-lifers need to be winsome and be willing to take verbal and physical abuse if necessary in order to remain faithful to our pledge to be non-violent. We also should take precautions to reduce the likelihood of these attacks, be prepared to film them and prosecute the perpetrators (if necessary) to the fullest extent of the law. We understand the risk we take each time we go into the marketplace of ideas with a message as counter-cultural as showing the victims of abortion. However, despite the threat we will not shrink back from representing the victims.”
VOL. 2 ISSUE 12 AUGUST 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM
VOL. 2 ISSUE 12 AUGUST 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM
49
How the NSA Stasi Surveillance State Conducts War Against Alternative Media WRITTEN BY Kurt N i m m o
W
orking in tandem with GCHQ – the British Government Control Headquarters – the NSA is engaged in a full court press against news and information outlets beyond the fortress walls of the Mockingbird media. Infowars.com and Alex Jones
have fallen victim to this disruptive behavior, specifically under Silverlord, a psychological operation designed to remove content from Youtube accounts the government considers “extremist,” in other words accounts carrying information the government does not want disseminated.
According to Glenn Greenwald the NSA and GCHQ disrupt media and engage in dirty tricks against enemies in a number of ways, including:
OPERATION UNDERPASS
OPERATION BADGER
OPERATION WARPATH
Change the outcome of online polls.
Mass delivery of email messaging to support an Information Operations campaign.
Mass delivery of SMS messages to support an Information Operations campaign.
OPERATION SILVERLORD
OPERATION MINITURE HERO
OPERATION SPRING BISHOP
Disruption of video-based websites hosting extremist content through concerted target discovery and content removal.
Active skype capability. Provision of real time call records (SkypeOut and SkypetoSkype) and bidirectional instant messaging. Also contact lists.
Mass delivery of SMS messages to support an Information Operations campaign.
50
VOL. 2 ISSUE 12 AUGUST 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM
Documents Released By NSA Whistleblower Edward Snowden Reveal How The NSA Conducts Information War Against The Alternative Media
OPERATION ANGRY PIRATE
OPERATION GATEWAY
OPERATION SLIPSTREAM
A tool that will permanently disable a target’s account on their computer.
Ability to artificially increase traffic to a website.
Ability to inflate page views on websites.
OPERATION IMPERIAL BARGE
OPERATION CHANGELING
OPERATION ELATE
A tool that will permanently disable a target’s account on their computer.
Ability to spoof any email address and send email under that identity.
A suite of tools for monitoring target use of the UK auction site eBay.
OPERATION GESTATOR
OPERATION PREDATORS FACE
OPERATION ROLLING THUNDER
For connecting two target phone together in a call.
Targeted Denial Of Service against Web Servers .
“Distributed denial of service using P2P. Built by ICTR, deployed by JTRIG”.
In February Greenwald reported that GCHQ had used its Joint Research Intelligence Group to infiltrate targeted groups online and destroy the reputations of people the government considers a threat. This is done by inserting “all sorts of false material onto the internet in order to destroy the reputation of its targets” and exploiting “social sci-
ences and other techniques to manipulate online discourse and activism to generate outcomes it considers desirable.” It is now obvious the establishment is pulling out all the stops in an effort to discredit and destroy the political opposition. The latest NSA revelations demonstrate the government did not end
COINTELPRO as it claimed in the 1970s and has instead created a form of highly sophisticated technological warfare to attack its political enemies. The Joint Research Intelligence Group’s goals are identical to those of its predecessor – to “expose, disrupt, misdirect, discredit, or otherwise neutralize the activities” of all viable opponents.
VOL. 2 ISSUE 12 AUGUST 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM
51
The Worst Trolls On The Internet Are The Government Trolls WRITTEN BY MICHAEL SNYDER
W
e have all run into them. All over the Internet, there are horrible trolls that seem to delight in making life miserable for other people. But the worst trolls of all are the government trolls. And thanks to Edward Snowden, we now have some startling new evidence of what really goes on behind the scenes. According to newly revealed documents, British spy agency GCHQ is manipulating online discussions, infiltrating the computers of specific targets, purposely destroying reputations, altering the results of online polls, and using Twitter, Facebook and YouTube for propaganda and espionage purposes. If people don’t start getting outraged about this now, the governments of the western world are going to see it as a green light to do even more. Eventually, it might get so bad that we won’t be able to trust much of anything that we see on the Internet. There is a lot about the Internet that is really awful, but one great thing about it is the fact that it has allowed average individuals to communicate on a mass scale unlike ever before. As the general population has become aware of how powerful of a tool the Internet can be, the elite have become extremely alarmed. Unlike so many other things in our society, it has not
been something that they have been able to easily control. But the elite have been starting to catch up to all of this new technology and are learning how to use it for their own purposes. Thanks to Snowden, we now have a list of specific tools that GCHQ has been using to manipulate the Internet. If we are going to have a free and open society, then we simply cannot have the governments of the western world running around systematically manipulating the Internet for their own purposes. And of course it is not just the British that are doing this kind of thing. Just recently, for example, the U.S. was caught manipulating discourse on Reddit and editing Wikipedia. The rest of the world is watching all of this and they are absolutely disgusted with us. The more that we act like Nazis, the more they are going to regard us as such. At this point, even our closest friends are loudly denouncing us. Germany just caught one U.S. spy, and a German newspaper claims that there are “dozens” of other CIA-recruited spies working in German ministries. And the Germans have become so paranoid about the NSA spying on them that the German government is actually considering going back to using typewriters…Germany may go
old school to guard against spying. The German government will continue to use encrypted e-mails and phones, but it could also expand its use of typewriters, said Patrick Sensburg, the head of the German parliament’s investigation into U.S. spying, in an interview with German TV station ARD Monday, Reuters reports. The Germans are even considering using non-electronic typewriters, Sensburg said. Why we would spy on our closest friends is something that I will never understand. And if we keep this up, soon we will not have any friends left at all. Fortunately, an increasing number of Americans are becoming fed up with the growing tyranny all around us. I love how John W. Whitehead expressed his frustrations in his recent article about the emerging police state in America… I don’t like being subjected to scans, searches, pat downs and other indignities by the TSA. I don’t like VIPR raids on so-called “soft” targets like shopping malls and bus depots by black-clad, Darth Vader look-alikes. I don’t like fusion centers, which represent the combined surveillance efforts of federal, state and local law enforcement. I don’t like laws that criminalize Americans for otherwise lawful activities such as holding religious studies
“If We Are Going To Have A Free And Open Society, Then We Simply Cannot Have The Governments Of The Western World Running Around Systematically Manipulating The Internet For Their Own Purposes.” 52
VOL. 2 ISSUE 12 AUGUST 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM
at home, growing vegetables in their yard, and collecting rainwater. I don’t like the NDAA, which allows the president and the military to arrest and detain American citizens indefinitely. I don’t like the Patriot Act, which opened the door to all manner of government abuses and intrusions on our privacy. I don’t like the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), which has become America’s standing army. I don’t like military weapons such as armored vehicles, sound cannons and the like being used against the American citizens. I don’t like government agencies such as the DHS, Post Office, Social Security Administration and Wildlife stocking up on hollow-point bullets. And I definitely don’t like the implications of detention centers being built that could house American citizens. The people of the western world need to stand up and say enough is enough. Are we going to stay silent as the integrity of the Internet is destroyed? Are we going to stay silent while the Internet is transformed into a government propaganda tool? Are we going to stay silent while the liberties and freedoms that we have left are systematically shredded? If you do not like the direction that all of this is going, now is the time to let your voice be heard.
“THE PEOPLE OF THE WESTERN WORLD NEED TO STAND UP AND SAY ENOUGH IS ENOUGH. ARE WE GOING TO STAY SILENT AS THE INTEGRITY OF THE INTERNET IS DESTROYED?”
WRITTEN BY PAUL JOSEPH WATSON
U.S. Govt. Editing Wikipedia to Smear Independent Media Personalities? Entry From IP Traced To U.S. House Of Representatives Describes Alex Jones As ‘Kremlin Disinformation Agent’
E
dits to the Wikipedia profiles of Alex Jones and Abby Martin which malign the two alternative media personalities as Kremlin propagandists are linked to an IP address associated with the House of Representatives, prompting suggestions that the U.S. government is involved in an online smear campaign. Yesterday evening a Wikipedia user attempted to edit radio host Alex Jones’ profile to add the sentence, “Following his appearances on Russia Today, there were allegations that he was a disinformation agent with ties to the Kremlin.” A simple trace on the IP address that posted the entry reveals that the computer involved “is registered to Information Systems, U.S. House of Representatives.” A separate edit describes RT host Abby Martin as a “Russian propagandist,” despite the fact that Martin made headlines back in March for publicly criti-
54
cizing Russia’s involvement in Crimea on her own show. The IP address leads back to the same computer. Although the Alex Jones entry remained pending, the entry describing Abby Martin as a “Russian propagandist” was posted live to Wikipedia before being amended a minute later. A Wiki News article notes that IP addresses linked to Capitol Hill have been “vandalizing” Wikipedia since 2006 and that, “Members of Congress or their staff were vandalizing Wikipedia by removing critical information in various articles, or adding false or offensive information. These edits were and continue to be done using computers owned or operated by the United States government.” It’s possible that the IP address is being spoofed to make it look like the edits are being made by someone on Capitol Hill when in fact they’re not, although the Electronic Frontier Foundation and Wiki News seem convinced
that the edits are indeed being made from government-owned computers. The notion of governments and large institutions gaming websites in order to spread disinformation is a firmly established practice. Newly released files obtained from whistleblower Edward Snowden confirm that the British government engages in “fake victim blog posts,” online “false flag operations,” as well as using tools that can sway online polls and manipulate public sentiment on the Internet. According to journalist Glenn Greenwald, the objective of the program is to, “inject all sorts of false material onto the internet in order to destroy the reputation of its targets.” Last month it emerged that the U.S. federal government was collaborating with Wikipedia editors to ‘improve’ Wikipedia entries related to government information.
VOL. 2 ISSUE 12 AUGUST 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM
VOL. 2 ISSUE 12 AUGUST 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM
55
56
VOL. 2 ISSUE 12 AUGUST 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM
WRITTEN BY STEVE WATSON
MOTHER JAILED, KID TAKEN BY SOCIAL SERVICES AFTER PLAYING AT PARK UNSUPERVISED Busy Body Neighbor Offers No Support For Working Mom, Calls Police Instead
A
mother in South Carolina has been thrown in jail, and her 9-year-old daughter taken into the custody of the Department of Social Services after busy body neighbours reported that the child was playing alone in a park. Debra Lynn Harrell faces charges of child neglect at the hands of the North Augusta “Department of Public Safety,” reports local news station WJBF, after her daughter was found playing unsupervised while Harrell was working. The police report states that the girl told officer that her mother always drops her off at the park before going to work. According to the report, Ms. Harrell admitted to letting her child play in the local park alone, saying that she
cannot supervise her all the time, because she has to work at a branch of McDonald’s to support her family. Instead of offering to help Harrell out by looking after the child, or helping find affordable day care, a neighbor simply reported the mother to the police, leading to Ms. Harrell being jailed. Of course, in the new America it is not normal to try to work to support your family. That’s just plain weird. For attempting to earn a living to support her child, rather than idly collecting on welfare, Harrell finds herself behind bars, with her child having been kidnapped by the government. “I understand the mom may have been in a difficult situation, not having someone to watch the child, but at the same time, you’ve got to
find somebody,” said Lesa Lamback, another neighbor who presumably offered her opinion but not her support. “You cannot just leave your child alone at a public place, especially. This day and time, you never know who’s around. Good, bad, it’s just not safe.” Lamback, clearly a model new American citizen, added. Tonya Cullum, a local childcare worker offered a more sympathetic opinion, noting “Some people may look at it as a babysitter.” “The parents can’t afford to keep them in care.” Cullum added, “They have to keep in during school time because we pick them up at school, make sure they got a safe place, but during the summertime, it’s like find some family, grandparents or even let them stay home by themselves.”
VOL. 2 ISSUE 12 AUGUST 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM
57
58
VOL. 2 ISSUE 12 AUGUST 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM
VOL. 2 ISSUE 12 AUGUST 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM
59
Poll: Majority Reject Obama Policies Because They’re Bad, Not Because Of Racism Eric Holder’s “Racial Animus” Is A Desperate And Pathetic Attempt To Pass Off Record Low Approval Ratings WRITTEN BY STEVE WATSON
80% 70%
72%
PRESIDENT
CONGRESS
SUPREME COURT
60% 50%
50%
40% 30%
18%
10% 1991
1993
25%
29%
20%
1995
1997
1999
2001
2003
2005
29%
2007
2009
7%
2011
2013
2015
At a time when ALL branches of government are hitting all time low approval ratings, the desperation of playing the race card is clearly evident. The presidency is now at 29 percent, a six year low, and an all time low under Obama, just 4 points higher than the all time low under then reviled George W. Bush in 2007.
A
ccording to a new Rasmussen Poll, a sizeable majority of Americans do not believe that opposition to Obama’s key policies stems from racism, as both the President and the Attorney General have repeatedly suggested. The survey found that 61% of likely U.S. voters think people who oppose the president’s policies do so primarily because they believe his policies are just plain bad, not because they are racist. Attorney General Eric Holder’s likely response will be that this poll
60
is also somehow racist. Holder has consistently suggested that criticism of Obama’s policies is driven purely by racism. Holder’s latest outburst came this past weekend on ABC News, as he charged that he and the President have been targets of “a racial animus” by political opponents. “There’s a certain level of vehemence, it seems to me, that’s directed at me [and] directed at the president,” Holder said. “You know, people talking about taking their country back. … There’s a certain racial component to this for
some people. I don’t think this is the thing that is a main driver, but for some there’s a racial animus.” “We’ve made lots of progress,” he added, fully breaking out the race card by adding. “I sit here as the first African-American attorney general, serving the first African-American president of the United States. And that has to show that we have made a great deal of progress.” Holder also defended his previous comments about race, including his infamous “nation of cowards” speech. “I wouldn’t walk away from that
VOL. 2 ISSUE 12 AUGUST 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM
speech,” Holder said. “I think we are still a nation that is too afraid to confront racial issues,” rarely engaging “one another across the color line [to] talk about racial issues.” Holder isn’t alone in his assertions, Obama himself has played the race card on several occasions. Most notably recently in an interview with the New Yorker magazine, Obama said that his skin color may help explain his declining job-approval rating. “There’s no doubt that there’s some folks who just really dislike me because they don’t like the idea of a black president,” Obama said. “Now, the flip side of it is there are some black folks and maybe some white folks who really like me and give me the benefit of the doubt precisely because I’m a black president.” At a time when ALL branches of government are hitting all time low approval ratings, the desperation of playing the race card is clearly evident. According to Gallup, the presidency is now at 29 percent, a six year low, and an all time low under Obama, just 4 points higher than the all time low under then reviled George W. Bush in 2007. Approval for the Presidency, has fallen a full seven percentage points from its 2013 rating of 36 percent. To suggest this is all driven by racism is scraping the barrel when one considers the multitude of scandals the administration has been at the center of, including the NSA, VA, IRS and Benghazi debacles, in addition to the handling of the crisis on the border, and the situations in Syria and Iraq. Americans have come to expect the racism propaganda from a desperate administration now. Red State has a comprehensive and entertaining list of the occasions on which Obama and his cronies have busted out the race card:
“I ceased to advertise my mother’s race at the age of twelve or thirteen” because she was white..” – Barack Obama Dreams From My Father “Did I mention that he’s black” – Obama during a FL fundraiser mocking Republicans in 2007 Race and ethnicity should be considered as a judge – Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor “Race remains a factor in the society” – Obama after Cambridge police arrested his black friend before the facts were in White polluters and white environmentalists are steering poison into the people of color communities – Van Jones (ex-Green Energy Czar) “You can’t vote against healthcare and call yourself a black man.” Jesse Jackson during Obamacare debate Obama — a “light-skinned’ African American ‘with no Negro dialect, unless he wanted to have one” – Harry Reid from his book (Game Changer) “In things racial we have always been and I believe continue to be… essentially a nation of cowards.” – Eric Holder speech Obstructing Obamacare is equivalent to obstructing the abolition of slavery according to Harry Reid Calling Obama a liar will bring back the KKK according to Rep. Hank Johnson (R-GA) Race a key component in TEA Party protests – Barack Obama (US News article) “This is a way to get at the president because of the way I can be identified with him, both due to the nature of our relationship and, you know, the fact that we’re both African-American.” – Eric Holder in the Fast and Furious Investigation “What Issa just showed us is that no matter what our stature in this world, someone can easily try to put us (blacks) in our place.” – Al Sharpton commenting on Eric Holder and Fast and Furious If I had son, he’d look like Trayvon” – Barack Obama on the Trayvon Martin death The fight for Obamacare is equal to the fight for equal rights – Kathleen Sebelius in NAACP speech Obama deserves a break for failing because he’s black and not white – Rep. Emanuel Cleaver (Chairman Congressional Black Caucus)
VOL. 2 ISSUE 12 AUGUST 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM
61
62
VOL. 2 ISSUE 12 AUGUST 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM
Big Corporations Have An OVERWHELMING Amount Of Power Over Our Food Supply
If We Did Actually Have A Capitalist System In This Country, We Would Have A High Level Of Competition In The Food Industry
F
WRITTEN BY MICHAEL SNYDER
rom our fields to our forks, huge corporations have an overwhelming amount of power over our food supply every step of the way. Right now there are more than 313 million people living in the United States, and the job of feeding all of those people is almost entirely in the hands of just a few dozen monolithic companies. If you do not like how our food is produced or don’t believe that it is healthy
enough, it isn’t very hard to figure out who is to blame. These mammoth corporations are not in business to look out for the best interests of the American people. Rather, the purpose of these corporations is to maximize wealth for their shareholders. So the American people end up eating billions of pounds of extremely unhealthy food that is loaded with chemicals and additives each year, and we just keep getting sicker and sicker as a society.
VOL. 2 ISSUE 12 AUGUST 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM
63
When so much power is concentrated in so few hands, it creates some tremendous dangers. Many of these giant corporations are extremely ruthless. Small farmers all over America are being wiped out and forced out of the business by the predatory business practices of these huge companies. But these big corporations are raking in big profits, so they don’t really care. If we did actually have a capitalist system in this country, we would have a high level of competition in the food industry. But instead, the U.S. food industry has become increasingly concentrated with each passing year. Just consider the following numbers about the U.S. agricultural sector… The U.S. agricultural sector suffers from abnormally high levels of concentration. Most economic sectors have concentration ratios around 40%, meaning that the top four firms in the industry control 40% of the market. If the concentration ratio is above 40%, experts believe competition can be threatened and market abuses are more likely to occur: the higher the number, the bigger the threat.
The Concentration Ratios In The Agricultural Sector Are Shocking -Four companies own 83.5% of the beef market. -The top four firms own 66% of the hog industry. -The top four firms control 58.5% of the broiler chicken industry. -In the seed industry, four companies control 50% of the proprietary seed market and 43% of the commercial seed market worldwide.
64
-When it comes to genetically engineered (GE) crops, just one company, Monsanto, boasts control of over 85% of U.S. corn acreage and 91% of U.S. soybean acreage. When so much power is concentrated in so few hands, it creates some tremendous dangers. And many of these giant corporations (such as Monsanto) are extremely ruthless. Small farmers all over America are being wiped out and forced out of business by the predatory business practices of these huge companies… Because farmers rely on both buyers and sellers for their business, concentrated markets squeeze them at both ends. Sellers with high market power can inflate the prices of machinery, seeds, fertilizers and other goods that farmers need for their farms, while powerful buyers, such as processors, suppress the prices farmers are paid. The razor-thin profit margins on which farmers are forced to operate often push them to “get big or get out”—expanding into mega-operations or exiting the business altogether. Of course the control that big corporations have over our food supply does not end at the farms. The distribution of our food is also very highly concentrated. The graphic
shared below was created by Oxfam International, and it shows how just 10 gigantic corporations control almost everything that we buy at the grocery store… And these food distributors are often not very good citizens either. For example, it was recently reported that Nestle is running a massive bottled water operation on a drought-stricken Indian reservation in California… Among the windmills and creosote bushes of San Gorgonio Pass, a nondescript beige building stands flanked by water tanks. A sign at the entrance displays the logo of Arrowhead 100% Mountain Spring Water, with water flowing from a snowy mountain. Semi-trucks rumble in and out through the gates, carrying load after load of bottled water. The plant, located on the Morongo Band of Mission Indians’ reservation, has been drawing water from wells alongside a spring in Millard Canyon for more than a decade. But as California’s drought deepens, some people in the area question how much water the plant is bottling and whether it’s right to sell water for profit in a desert region where springs are rare and underground aquifers have been declining. Nestle doesn’t stop to ask whether
VOL. 2 ISSUE 12 AUGUST 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM
it is right or wrong to bottle water in the middle of the worst drought in the recorded history of the state of California. They have the legal right to do it and they are making large profits doing it, and so they are just going to keep on doing it. Perhaps you are thinking that you can avoid all of these corporations by eating organic and by shopping at natural food stores. Well, it isn’t necessarily that easy. According to author Wenonah Hauter, the “health food industry” is also extremely concentrated… Over the past 20 years, Whole Foods Market has acquired its competition, including Wellspring Grocery, Bread of Life, Bread & Circus, Food for Thought, Fresh Fields, Wild Oats Markets and others. Today the chain dominates the market because it has no national competitor. Over the past five years its gross sales have increased by half (47 percent) to $11.7 billion, and its net profit quadrupled to $465.6 million. One of the ways it has achieved this profitability is by selling conventional foods under the false illusion that they are better than products sold at a regular grocery store. Consumers falsely conclude that these products have been screened and are better, and they are willing to pay a higher price. The distribution of organic foods is also extremely concentrated. A little-known company, United Natural Foods, Inc. (UNFI) now controls the distribution of organic and natural products. Publically traded, the company has a contract with Whole Foods and it is the major source of these products for the remaining independent natural food stores. This relationship has resulted in increasingly high prices for these foods. Small manufacturers are dependent on contracts with UNFI to get their products to market and conversely, small retailers often have to pay a premium price for products
because of their dependence on this major distributor. Over the past five years, UNFI’s net sales increased by more than half (55.6 percent) $5.2. billion. Its net profit margin increased by 88 percent to $91 million. Everywhere you look, the corporations are in control. And this is especially true when you look at big food retailers such as WalMart. Right now, grocery sales account for about half of all business at Wal-Mart, and approximately one out of every three dollars spent on groceries in the United States is spent at Wal-Mart. That is absolutely astounding, and it obviously gives Wal-Mart an immense amount of power. In fact, if you can believe it, Wal-Mart actually purchases a billion pounds of beef every single year. So the next time someone asks you where the beef is, you can tell them that it is at Wal-Mart. On the restaurant side, the ten largest fast food corporations account for 47 percent of all fast food sales, and the love affair that Americans have with fast food does not appear to be in danger of ending any time soon. Personally, if you do not like how these corporate giants are behaving, you can always complain. But you are just one person among 313 million, and most of these big corporations are not going to consider the ramblings of one person to be of any significance whatsoever. Collectively, however, we have great power. And the way that we are going to get these big corporations to change is by voting with our wallets. Unfortunately, the vast majority of Americans seem quite satisfied with the status quo. So the population as a whole is likely going to continue to get sicker, fatter and less healthy with each passing year, and the big food corporations are going to keep becoming even more powerful.
VOL. 2 ISSUE 12 AUGUST 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM
65
66
VOL. 2 ISSUE 12 AUGUST 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM
VOL. 2 ISSUE 12 AUGUST 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM
67