How Much Longer Can Democrats Stand By President Obama’s Lawlessness?

How Much Longer Can Democrats Stand By President Obama’s Lawlessness?

by SILVIO CANTO, JR. | AMERICAN THINKER | JUNE 8, 2014

Put me down as someone who has not seen this kind of irresponsible lawlessness in the US before.

President Nixon had Watergate but that's beginning to look a lot like a PG movie compared to what we are seeing from this administration, from going around Congress on the prisoner swap to the events on the US-Mexico border.

For the record, I support a moderate immigration reform package that allows some of "the dreamers" to stay here, especially those who've been succeeding in school or who want to serve in the US military.

It should be part of a broad border security plan. The 10-12 million people who are here will have to wait until we can understand the economic impact of adding more people to an economy that is not producing enough jobs.

However, I can not blame those members of the GOP who've concluded that President Obama will not respect whatever Congress does to resolve the immigration problem.

Let's look at what is happening on the US-Mexico border.

According to news reports, a spike in illegal immigration is overwhelming border states. As Senator Cruz of Texas said, this is an outrage: "Earlier this week, Breitbart Texas Managing Director Brandon Darby released leaked photos of children in U.S. processing cells who entered the U.S. illegally and unaccompanied. The photos encapsulated the humanitarian crisis in relation to young, often unaccompanied, border crossers.

Cruz said of the skyrocketing number of children crossers, "When I was down at the border, Border Patrol agents were telling me with horror that roughly 10 percent of apprehended people were unaccompanied minors."

He continued, "The people who are bringing men, women, and children in illegally are not pleasant, happy, placid coyotes.

These are criminal cartels.

These are ruthless, brutal, nasty criminals. The idea that you have parents handing their teenage daughter or son over to a global criminal cartel is a humanitarian crisis. Untold numbers of these teens are facing assault, are facing a life of hell being turned over to drug kingpins.""

This is also a perfect storm.

First, we have a president who "panders" but never did a darn thing about the problem when he had majorities in both Houses of Congress. He loves "si se puede" speeches but has not done much to address the problem at any level.

Second, we have a president who has never publicly said that the US border has to be respected. In other words, coming to the US, as our family did in 1964, is not an entitlement. It is something that you have to earn and it starts by respecting the law.

Third, we have a weak Democrat party that desperately needs a massive Hispanic turnout in November to defend their electoral gains of the past.

Fourth, we have large numbers of people who've been told that they will "make it" by getting over here before Congress votes.

Fifth, and most important, we have a president who does not care about the rule of law. It's all about turnout in November.

So we have thousands and thousands of kids, sitting on the border.

Again, this is an outrage and it starts with President Obama, a man who refuses to defend the people who live in border states.

Susan Rice Admits U.S. Giving Arms To AlQaeda In Syria

by KURT NIMMO | INFOWARS.COM | JUNE 7, 2014

Weapons are routinely transferred from "moderates" to al-Qaeda affiliates Last week Obama took to his teleprompter to tell the American people the United States will provide lethal aid to “moderate” mercenaries fighting in Syria to overthrow the al-Assad government.

Obama’s declaration was nothing new. In September, the mercenaries said they were receiving weapons from the United States. Obama had promised the arms a few months earlier but the media insisted “U.S. officials are still grappling with what type and how much weaponry to send the opposition forces and how to ensure it stays out of the hands of extremists battling for control of Syria,” the Associated Press reported.

In September IHS Jane’s, a defense consultancy, estimated “there are around 10,000 jihadists — who would include foreign fighters — fighting for powerful factions linked to al-Qaeda.”

Around “30,000 to 35,000… hardline Islamists… focused purely on the Syrian war rather than a wider international struggle” are participating in the proxy war while “at least a further 30,000 moderates belonging to groups that have an Islamic character, meaning only a small minority of the rebels are linked to secular or purely nationalist groups” are involved in the fighting, The Telegraph reported.

“The moderates, often underfunded, fragmented and chaotic, appear no match for Islamist units, which include fighters from organizations designated ‘terrorist’ by the United States,” Reuters reported last June.

On Friday, Obama’s top foreign policy advisor, Susan Rice, said this miniscule contingent of “moderate” mercenaries are now receiving weapons from the United States. Rice claimed she is “heartbroken” about the destruction of Syria – destruction that is a direct result of the effort by the U.S., Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Turkey to oust al-Assad and defeat the Syrian Army.

“That’s why the United States has ramped up its support for the moderate vetted opposition, providing

lethal and non-lethal support where we can to support both the civilian opposition and the military opposition,” she told CNN. Despite Rice’s admission, the Obama administration has remained vague about lethal assistance.

“We’re not in a position to detail all of our assistance, but as we’ve made clear, we provide both military and non-military assistance to the opposition,” National Security Council spokeswoman Caitlin Hayden said after Rice’s remarks made while she was traveling with Obama to D-Day 70th anniversary celebrations in Normandy.

In April we reported on the fact the U.S. provides weapons to al-Nusra and other terrorists groups in Syria by way of its allegedly vetted “moderate” mercenaries. Jamal Maarouf, who runs the Syrian Revolutionary Front (SRF) created by the CIA and Saudi and Qatari intelligence, said if “the people who support us [U.S., Saudis, Qataris] tell us to send weapons to another group, we send them. They asked us a month ago to send weapons to Yabroud [a city in Syria] so we sent a lot of weapons there.

When they asked us to do this, we do it.”

According to Barak Barfi, a research fellow for the globalist funded New America Foundation, alNusra, the al-Qaeda-linked group known for summarily executing Syrian soldiers and other atrocities (including beheading Christians), receives weapons indirectly from SRF. Investigative journalist Seymour Hersh reported on April 17 that for “months there had been acute concern among senior military leaders and the intelligence community about the role in the war of Syria’s neighbors, especially Turkey. Prime Minister Recep Erdoğan was known to be supporting the al-Nusra Front, a jihadist faction among the rebel opposition, as well as other Islamist rebel groups.”

The remarks by Susan Rice are yet another indication the Obama administration is arming the only viable fighting force inside Syria – al-Nusra and other al-Qaeda affiliates. The U.S. may indeed send weapons to “moderates,” but the large number of defections from the Free Syria Army to the ranks Islamist rebel groups underscores the fact a transfer occurs.

In fact, if we can believe Jamal Maarouf, the U.S. and its Saudi and Qatari partners are instructing the moderates to transfer weapons, including man-portable air defense systems, to al-Qaeda and other groups who are the sworn enemies of the United States and the West.

Rice: Allies have confidence in Obama VIDEO BELOW http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1tVc6WK0HTA

Video: Psychologist Concerned About Mental Stability of President: Obama May Not Be “Sane”

by MAC SLAVO | SHTF PLAN | JUNE 8, 2014 As the U.S. government pushes for regular mental health screenings for American citizens to ensure we are not terrorists and that we are capable of owning firearms or raising children, perhaps we should start at the top of the hierarchy – with the President of the United States.

He is, after all, the “decision maker” for our nation and is the sole person responsible for determining if and when the “red button” needs to be pushed.

But what if such a health screening determined that the American people elected a mentally unstable individual to its highest office?

Here’s the scary version. According to psychologist Dr. Gina Loudon this may well be what has happened.

Speaking on Lou Dobbs Tonight, Dr. Loudon says that President Obama is displaying “erratic” and “irrational” behavior that may be indicative of someone who may not be “sane.”

Psychologist Concerned About Mental Stability of President: Obama May Not Be “Sane” VIDEO BELOW http://www.infowars.com/video-psychologist-concerned-about-mental-stability-of-presidentLou Dobbs: The President hasn’t mentioned a word about Sgt. Tahmooressi held in a Mexican prison. Your thoughts on the distinction here between the two, in at least Obama’s mind?

Dr. Loudon: You know, I will say to you, Lou, I am very, very concerned about the mental stability of this President at this point. Some of his behavior seems irrational to me. It seems beyond that of just a typical narcissistic, arrogant, sort of, ‘I’m a leader of a big country and I feel tyrannical at the moment’ kind of attitude. It really seems to me like this President is demonstrating behavior that is not only antiAmerican, but irrational and erratic and perhaps not exactly what we might want to deem sane.

INFOWARS.COM BECAUSE THERE'S A WAR ON FOR YOUR MIND