ISIS = Alqaeda War Is Peace 25th Issue Infowars Magazine

Page 1


2

VOL. 3 ISSUE 2 OCTOBER 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM


VOL. 3 ISSUE 2 OCTOBER 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM

3


FEATURED 18

20 CONSPIRACY THEORIES THAT TURNED OUT TO BE TRUE

30

Obama’s Long ISIS War: It Will Take Years and Kill Thousands

34 36 4

W R I TTE N BY PAU L JOESEP H WATS O N & A L EX JONES

W R I TTE N BY KU RT NI M M O

Obama Ignores Congress Again to Launch Syria Attack With No Legal Basis W R I T TE N BY PAU L JOSEP H WATS O N

PROXY WAR: HOW THE WEST CREATED ISIS W R I TTE N BY M I KA EL TH A L EN

VOL. 3 ISSUE 2 OCTOBER 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM


15

50

Homeland Security: No ISIS Threat at Border

W R IT T EN BY A N TH ON Y G U CC IA R D I

WRITTE N BY KU R T NI M M O

30 Million Americans On Antidepressants And 21 Other Facts About America’s Endless Pharmaceutical Nightmare

DHS Official Claims Border “More Secure Than Ever”

51

WRITTE N BY KI T DANI ELS

26

52

WRITTE N BY PAU L JO SEPH WATSON

W R IT T EN BY KU R T N IM MO

28

War Propaganda Works: Large Majority Of Americans Now Want Military Action In Syria, Iraq

54

Angry McCain Admits Meeting With ISIS, Scolds Rand Paul For Not Knowing Terrorists

56

43

58

W R IT T EN BY MIKA E L TH A L E N

44

HuffPo: Raise Taxes and Bring Back Draft to Fight ISIS

CIA Admitted to Staging Fake Jihadist Videos in 2010 W R IT T EN BY MIKA E L TH A L E N

CDC Whistle Blower’s ‘Vaccines and Autism’ Link may be Silenced Forever WRITTE N BY PAU L FASSA

61

W R IT T EN BY KU R T N IM MO

46

The Big One: CDC whistleblower goes public WRITTE N BY JO N R APPO PO R T

W R IT T EN BY STE V E WATS ON

SLIP-UP? MCCAIN SAYS “NATIONAL SECURITY TEAM RECOMMENDED ARMING ISIS”

Flashback: Ebola Goes Airborne, Causes Outbreak in Medical Lab WRITTE N BY KI T DANI ELS

W R IT T EN BY ST E V E WATS ON

42

Virologist: ‘It’s Too Late, Ebola Will Kill 5 Million’

VOLUME 3 ISSUE 2 OCTOBER 2014

W R IT T EN BY M IC H A E L S N YD E R

House Approves Plan to Arm and Train ISIS to Fight ISIS

CONTENTS

10

Top Experts Warn Of ‘Inevitable’ Fukushima Disaster In California

“GLOBAL WARMING” ADVOCATES PLAN MARCH AMID RECORD COLD TEMPERATURES WRITTE N BY KI T DANI ELS

64

U.S. Army Plans to Battle Anti-Government Dissidents in “Megacities” WRITTE N BY PAU L JO SEPH WATS ON

O CTO B E R 2014 The October 2014 Issue of Infowars Magazine exposes ISIS for what they really are, another U.S. funded “boogeyman army” being used as an excuse for a never-ending war in the middle east. The CDC whistleblower who recently released information linking vaccines and Autism is another topic of discussion covered this month. Everything from ISIS at the U.S. Mexico border, to the rapid spread of Ebola throughout West Africa is revealed in this edition of Infowars Magazine.

VOL. 3 ISSUE 2 OCTOBER 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM

55


SIGHTINGS SUBMIT YOUR PHOTOS, QUOTES, MEMES, LETTERS, AND POLITICAL ILLUSTRATIONS TO GRAPHICS@INFOWARS.COM

6

VOL. 3 ISSUE 2 OCTOBER 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM


QUOTES “We backed I believe in some cases, some of the wrong people and not in the right part of the Free Syrian Army and that’s a little confusing to people, so I’ve always maintained… that we were backing the wrong types.” “The constitution vests the power of declaring war in Congress; therefore no offensive expedition of importance can be undertaken until after they shall have deliberated upon the subject and authorized such a measure.” “Everything that American troops have done in Iraq, all the fighting and all the dying, the bleeding, and the building and the training and the partnering – all of it has led to this moment of success….we’re leaving behind a sovereign, stable and self-reliant Iraq.” “If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.”

THOMAS MCINERNEY GEORGE WASHINGTON PRESIDENTOBAMA JOSEPH GOEBBELS

VOL. 3 ISSUE 2 OCTOBER 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM

7


A BOUT A LEX JONES

A S H ORT STO RY A B OUT US Infowars Magazine was founded as a monthly publication in 2012 as the answer to the eminent threat of internet censorship. The first issue debuted in september 2012, bringing the fight for the infowar to a new front, the changing landscape of print media. Over 100,000 copies are distributed world-wide each month, spreading truth journalism with the passion of grassroots publication and the permanence of physical print. Our distribution points across the globe continue to grow and our subscriptions increase as people like you take the infowar to the streets, providing magazines to stores, restaurants, businesses, and neighborhoods. Take a stand against tyranny and join the front lines in the fight for freedom.

The Alex Jones Show is a nationally syndicated news/talk show based out of Austin, TX. The show is syndicated by the Genesis Communication Network on well over 100 AM and FM radio stations across the United States, and has a large internet based audience.

SOCIAL SITES: Facebook.com/AlexanderEmerickJones Twitter: @RealAlexJones Youtube.com/TheAlexJonesChannel

INFOWARS.COM

PRISONPLANET.COM

PLANETINFOWARS.COM

WWW.PRISONPLANET.TV

Home of the #1 Internet news show in the world.

Reporters on the scene, articles, and special coverage.

Instantly connect to what’s most important to you. Follow your friends, experts, favorite celebrities, and breaking news.

Get access to all the channels: The Alex Jones Show, Nightly News, Exclusive Video Reports, 60+ Movies and Documentaries, Books, and more.

8

VOL. 3 ISSUE 2 OCTOBER 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM


L I ST E N TO T H E AL E X J ON E S S H OW You can listen to the show on-demand over the internet, either when the show is on the air (Mon-Fri, 11:00 a.m.—2:00 p.m CST and Sunday from 4:00.—6:00 PM CST) or you can stream a feed of the latest show at www.infowars.com/show

CONTRIBUTION CONTRIBUTING WRITERS

PUBLISHER Alex Jones

MANAGING EDITOR Kelen McBreen

ART DIRECTOR Rob Reeger

GRAPHICS & PHOTOGRAPHY Rob Reeger Ryan Sheridan

CONTRIBUTING Anthony Freda Jack Laughner Peter Hoffmeister

Paul J. Watson Kurt Nimmo Kit Daniels Adan Salazar Steve Watson Michael Snyder Mikael Thalen Paul Craig Roberts

PROJECT MANAGER

CHECK OUT INFOWARSSHOP.COM Check out Infowars gear, exclusive Alex Jones Movies, Infowars Magazine, health and wellness, preparedness products, and more.

C O N TA C T U S letters@infowars.com graphics@infowars.com

Tim Fruge

EDITORIAL ASSISTANT Kit Daniels

SINGLE ISSUES and bulk orders are available online at www.infowarsstore.com or through customer service at 1-888-253-3139 • ADVERTISING inquiries can be directed to 512-646-4414 or advertising@ infowars.com • INFORMATION requests, whether general or editorial, can be found by contacting letters@infowars.com • Infowars Magazine is published by Free Speech Systems, LLC. 12 times a year with a circulation of 90,000 copies. All content within this magazine is copyright of Free Speech Systems, LLC. To receive a free electronic version of the magazine, become an Infowars Insider by signing up at www.infowars.com/newletter • PERMISSION to reprint original Infowars articles in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given. Some articles are copyrighted by our contributing writers, so check to see if copyright-free status applies. The articles appearing within this publication reflect the opinions and attitudes of their respective authors and not necessarily those of the publisher, advertisers, or editorial team.

VOL. 3 ISSUE 2 OCTOBER 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM

9


Top Of ‘ Expert Fuk Inevit s Wa rn a u b s In C him le’ alif a Di orni saster a

WRIT

10

TEN

BY A NTH ONY GUC CIA RDI

VOL. 3 ISSUE 2 OCTOBER 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM


since the catastrophic meltdown of the fukushima nuclear power plant in march of 2011 irreparably altered the state of the planet for the known future, the incident has been shrouded in nothing but bureaucratic cover ups and governmentbacked disinformation. now, within our own borders, top experts turned whistleblowers are warning of a nuclear nightmare that could surpass fukushima and chernobyl alike by leaps and bounds.

I

nitially listed as a Level 4 incident on the International Nuclear Event Scale, pressure from scientists on an international level ultimately led to Fukushima’s classification as a maximum Level 7 accident within the INES system. Now, even after witnessing what happens when a major power plant is placed within the crosshairs of serious earthquake activity, a ‘new American Fukushima’ may be sitting off the Central Coast within California’s Diablo Canyon. And top level nuclear experts, including a senior federal nuclear inspector turned whistleblower, are warning that the California-based plant is a sitting radioactive duck amid the nearby faults that have actually been found to be more dangerous than previously thought. Back in 2008, a new fault known as the Shoreline fault was discovered just offshore from the Diablo Canyon nuclear facility: a discovery that truly changes everything about the ‘safety’ of the California plant. The whistleblower and former federal inspector of the plant, Michael Peck, has even presented his case highlighting the serious hazards of the plant he used to oversee to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission in a highly confidential report. National organizations are already calling attention to Peck’s finding and reports, with senior strategist Damon Moglen of Friends of the Earth International stating: “We agree with him that Diablo Canyon is vulnerable to earthquakes and must be shut down immediately. Rather than the NRC keeping this a secret, there must be a thorough investigation with public hearings to determine whether these reactors can operate safely.” Yet it appears that the general public is not even being made aware of what’s really going on, let alone the real threat that they face on a national and international level. Infowars reporter Lee Ann Mcadoo recently traveled to the very location of the Diablo Canyon nuclear site, where residents and visitors alike were shocked to learn about what the experts had to say regarding their local nuclear power plant: As usual, the general public is not being told about ways in which they can prepare themselves for a nuclear meltdown. Instead, government officials were caught back in February stockpiling iodine stores in excess of 14 million doses in a purchase order that came conveniently after reports began surfacing over another possible meltdown at the Fukushima plant. The doses will be enough for many officials and federal employees, however the public will be forced to fend for themselves — and they will not even be told about the necessity of iodine nor how they can better prepare their families for a radioactive scenario. The reality is that even getting a hold of low quality potassium iodide, which I would not ever personally take over a higher quality form of pure iodine, is becoming difficult as the population becomes aware of Fukushima’s expansive dangers. Many manufacturers are now stockpiling raw iodine and holding on to the element as a form of investment with the knowledge that Fukushima may very well meltdown in the coming months. For this reason, we have had a very hard time securing our nascent iodine formula that many in the field of preparedness have been stockpiling for quite some time.


Fukushima Radiation Continues As Experts Warn Of ‘American Fukushima’ But even outside out Peck’s analysis and years of experience as a nuclear inspector at the federal level, numerous high level scientists and researchers have been speaking out about the continuation of Fukushima’s devastating effects and the need to further stabilize and shutdown nuclear plants along the fault lines throughout the United States — and California is not the only region in question. Even another earthquake affecting Japan could lead to the ‘evacuation of North America’, according to award winning scientists David Suzuki. In statements made during a presentation on water ecology at the University of Alberta, scientist Suzuki went on record to say that in the event of another seven or above earthquake, which he says has about a 95% chance of occurring over the next three years, it would require a complete evacuation of North America and mean ‘bye bye Japan. “I have seen a paper which says that if in fact the fourth plant goes under in an earthquake and those rods are exposed, it’s bye bye Japan and everybody on the west coast of North America should evacuate,” he said. Specifically speaking to the nature of Fukushima’s ticking time bomb, Suzuki began the breakdown of the plant’s numerous threats with stating the very real concept that Fukushima is perhaps the largest threat to both humanity and the planet that we face in the immediate future. “Fukushima is the most terrifying situation I can imagine,” he said before delving into the issue. “Three out of the four plants were destroyed in the earthquake and in the tsunami. The fourth one has been so badly damaged that the fear is, if there’s another earthquake of a seven or above that, that building will go and then all hell breaks loose… And the probability of a seven or above earthquake in the next three years is over 95 per cent.”

12

And Suzuki is not the only one with major concerns. In fact, Suzuki is perhaps one of the very few who actually received media attention due to his celebrity status as a recipient of 16 significant academic awards and host of the popular CBC Television program entitled ‘The Nature of Things’. Yale University professor Charles Perrow has voiced similar concerns in a telling piece entitled ‘Fukushima Forever’, which highlights the very serious threat of nuclear meltdown as a result of human error when it comes to removing the plant’s spent fuel rods. A danger that the United States government certainly recognizes as legitimate based on the analysis of top experts, and undoubtedly is silently preparing for behind the scenes. Perrow writes: Much more serious is the danger that the spent fuel rod pool at the top of the nuclear plant number four will collapse in a storm or an earthquake, or in a failed attempt to carefully remove each of the 1,535 rods and safely transport them to the common storage pool 50 meters away. Conditions in the unit 4 pool, 100 feet from the ground, are perilous, and if any two of the rods touch it could cause a nuclear reaction that would be uncontrollable. The radiation emitted from all these rods, if they are not continually cool and kept separate, would require the evacuation of surrounding areas including Tokyo. Because of the radiation at the site the 6,375 rods in the common storage pool could not be continuously cooled; they would fission and all of humanity will be threatened, for thousands of years. The Fukushima nuclear nightmare is far from over, and even now the disaster is being extremely mishandled and blatantly ignored by plant operator company TEPCO and the Japanese government. In the event of an American Fukushima within California, which would in fact be much more devastating, there is truly no telling how much of a fatal blow would be dealt to humanity.

VOL. 3 ISSUE 2 OCTOBER 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM


VOL. 3 ISSUE 2 OCTOBER 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM

13


14

VOL. 3 ISSUE 2 OCTOBER 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM


30 Million Americans On Antidepressants And 21 Other Facts About America’s Endless Pharmaceutical Nightmare

H

WRITTEN BY MICHAEL SNYDER

as there ever been a nation more hooked on drugs than the United States? And I am not just talking about illegal drugs – the truth is that the number of Americans addicted to legal drugs is far greater than the number of Americans addicted to illegal drugs. As you will read about below, more than 30 million Americans are currently on antidepressants and doctors in the U.S. wrote more than 250 million prescriptions for painkillers last year. Sadly, most people got hooked on these drugs very innocently. They trusted that their doctors would never prescribe something for them that would be harmful, and they trusted that the federal government would never approve any drugs that were not safe. And once the drug companies get you hooked, they often have you for life. You see, the reality of the matter is that some of these “legal drugs” are actually some of the most addictive substances on the entire planet. And when they start raising the prices on those drugs, there isn’t much that the addicts can do about it. It is a brutally efficient business model, and the pharmaceutical industry guards their territory fiercely. Very powerful people will often do some really crazy things when there are hundreds of billions of dollars at stake.

The following are 21 facts about America’s endless pharmaceutical nightmare that everyone should know.. According to the New York Times, more than 30 million Americans are currently taking antidepressants.

The rate of antidepressant use among middle aged women is far higher than for the population as a whole. At this point, one out of every four women in their 40s and 50s is taking an antidepressant.

medication.

Americans account for about five percent of the global population, but we buy more than 50 percent of the pharmaceutical drugs. Americans also consume a whopping 80 percent of all prescription painkillers. It is hard to believe, but doctors in the United States write 259 million prescriptions for painkillers each year. Prescription painkillers are some of the most addictive legal drugs, and our doctors are serving as enablers for millions upon millions of Americans that find themselves hooked on drugs that they cannot kick. Overall, pharmaceutical drug use in America is at an all-time high. According to a study conducted by the Mayo Clinic, nearly 70 percent of all Americans are on at least one prescription drug, and 20 percent of all Americans are on at least five prescription drugs. According to the CDC, approximately 9 out of every 10 Americans that are at least 60 years old say that they have taken at least one prescription drug within the last month. In 2010, the average teen in the United States was taking 1.2 central nervous system drugs. Those are the kinds of drugs which treat conditions such as ADHD and depression.

VOL. 3 ISSUE 2 OCTOBER 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM

15


A very disturbing Government Accountability Office report found that approximately one-third of all foster children in the United States are on at least one psychiatric drug. An astounding 95 percent of the “experimental medicines” that the pharmaceutical industry produces are found not to be safe and are never approved. Of the remaining 5 percent that are approved, we often do not find out that they are deadly to us until decades later. One study discovered that mothers that took antidepressants during pregnancy were four times more likely to have a baby that developed an autism spectrum disorder. It has been estimated that prescription drugs kill approximately 200,000 people in the United States every single year. An American dies from an unintentional prescription drug overdose every 19 minutes. According to Dr. Sanjay Gupta, accidental prescription drug overdose is “the leading cause of acute preventable death for Americans. In the United States today, prescription painkillers kill more Americans than heroin and cocaine combined. According to the CDC, approximately three quarters of a million people a year are rushed to emergency rooms in the United States because of adverse reactions to pharmaceutical drugs.

16

The number of prescription drug overdose deaths in the United States is five times higher than it was back in 1980. A survey conducted for the National Institute on Drug Abuse found that more than 15 percent of all U.S. high school seniors abuse prescription drugs. More than 26 million women over the age of 25 say that they are “using prescription medications for unintended uses. If all of these antidepressants are helping, then why are more Americans killing themselves? The suicide rate for Americans between the ages of 35 and 64 increased by nearly 30 percent between 1999 and 2010. The number of Americans that die by suicide is now greater than the number of Americans that die as a result of car accidents every year. Antidepressant use has been linked to mass shootings in America over and over and over again, and yet the mainstream media is eerily quiet about this. Is it because they don’t want to threaten one of their greatest sources of advertising revenue? The amount of money that the pharmaceutical industry is raking in is astronomical. It has been reported that Americans spent more than 280 billion dollars on prescription drugs during 2013. If many of these drugs were not so addictive, the pharmaceutical companies would make a lot less money. And pharmaceutical drug addicts often don’t fit the profile of what we think a “drug addict” would look

VOL. 3 ISSUE 2 OCTOBER 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM


like. For example, CNN shared the story of a 55-year-old grandmother named Cynthia Scudo that become addicted to prescription painkillers… For Scudo, her addiction began — as they all do — innocently enough. She sought relief from hip pain, possibly caused by scarring from cesarean sections she had delivering several of her children. Her then-husband recommended a physician. “There was no physical therapy offered,” she said of the doctor’s visit. “The first reaction was, let’s give you some drugs.” He put her on OxyContin. By the second week, she was physically addicted. She was popping so much of the painkiller and other drugs such as anti-anxiety Valium that they equated to a dosage for three men. There is lots and lots of money to be made from addiction. In fact, if the U.S. health care system was a totally separate nation it would actually be the 6th largest economy on the entire globe. We are talking about piles of money larger than most people would ever dare to imagine. And with so much money floating around, it is quite easy for the pharmaceutical industry to buy the cooperation of our politicians and of the media. Some time when you are watching television in the evening, consciously take note of how often a pharmaceutical commercial comes on. It has gotten to the point where we are literally being inundated with these ads. They are already making hundreds of billions of dollars, and they think that there is room for even more growth. Will they ever be satisfied?

There is LOTS of money to be made from addiction. In fact, if the U.S. health care system was a totally separate nation it would actually be the 6th largest economy on the entire globe.

VOL. 3 ISSUE 2 OCTOBER 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM

17


WRITTEN BY PAUL WATSON & ALEX JONES

When questioning the official narrative proved crucial

Despite the fact that the term “conspiracy theory” has been weaponized by the establishment as a perjorative slur against anyone who questions the official narrative of any government pronouncement, there are innumerable examples throughout history of conspiracies that were proven to be true.

18

VOL. 3 ISSUE 2 OCTOBER 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM


1) Operation Ajax And False Flag Terror The notion that governments and intelligence agencies carry out acts of false flag terrorism has long been derided by the establishment media as a conspiracy theory, despite there being a plethora of historically documented instances. After decades of denial, in August 2013 the CIA finally admitted its role in staging the coup in Iran which led to the overthrow of Mohammad Mossadegh in 1953 under the umbrella of Operation AJAX. Under AJAX, the CIA oversaw covert operations which included acts of false flag terror which claimed the lives of some 300 people.

2) Gulf of Tonkin On August 4, 1964, President Lyndon Johnson went on national television and told the nation that North Vietnam had attacked U.S. ships. “Repeated acts of violence against the armed forces of the United States must be met not only with alert defense, but with a positive reply. That reply is being given as I speak tonight,” Johnson declared. Congress soon passed the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution, which provided Johnson with pre-approved authority to conduct military operations against North Vietnam. By 1969, over 500,000 troops were fighting in Southeast Asia. Johnson and his Secretary of Defense, Robert McNamara, had bamboozled Congress and the American people. In fact, North Vietnam had not attacked the USS Maddox, as the Pentagon claimed, and the “unequivocal proof” of an “unprovoked” second attack against the U.S. warship was a ruse.

3) Operation Gladio: State Sponsored Terror Blamed on the Left

Following the Second World War, the CIA and Britain’s MI6 collaborated through NATO on Operation Gladio, an effort to create a “stay behind army” to fight communism in the event of a Soviet invasion of Western Europe. Gladio quickly transcended its original mission and became a covert terror network consisting of right-wing militias, organized crime elements, agent provocateurs and secret military units. The so-called stay behind armies were active in France, Belgium, Denmark, The Netherlands, Norway, Germany, and Switzerland. Gladio’s “Strategy of Tension” was designed to portray leftist political groups in Europe as terrorists and frighten the populace into voting for authoritarian governments. In order to carry out this goal, Gladio operatives conducted a number of deadly terrorist attacks that were blamed on leftists and Marxists. In August of 1980, Gladio operatives bombed a train station in Bologna, killing 85 people. Initially blamed on the Red Brigades, it was later discovered that fascist elements within the Italian secret police and Licio Gelli, the head of the P2 Masonic Lodge, were responsible for the terror attack. Other fascist groups, including Avanguardia Nazionale and Ordine Nuovo, were mobilized and engaged in terror. Operation Gladio ultimately claimed the lives of hundreds of people across Europe. According to Vincenzo Vinciguerra, a Gladio terrorist serving a life-sentence for murdering policemen, the reason for Gladio was simple. It was designed to force these people, the Italian public, to turn to the state to ask for greater security. This is the political logic that lies behind all the massacres and the bombings which remain unpunished, because the state cannot convict

itself or declare itself responsible for what happened.

4) Operation Northwoods In the covert war against the communist regime in Cuba under the CIA’s Operation Mongoose, the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff unanimously proposed state-sponsored acts of terrorism in side the United States. The plan included shooting down hijacked American airplanes, the sinking of U.S. ships, and the shooting of Americans on the streets of Washington, D.C. The outrageous plan even included a staged NASA disaster that would claim the life of astronaut John Glenn. Reeling under the embarrassing failure of the CIA’s botched Bay of Pigs invasion of Cuba, president Kennedy rejected the plan in March of 1962. A few months later, Kennedy denied the plan’s author, General Lyman Lemnitzer, a second term as the nation’s highest ranking military officer. In November of 1963, Kennedy was assassinated in Dallas, Texas.

5) The Gleiwitz Incident The Gleiwitz incident refers to a false flag operation carried out by the Nazis on 31 August 1939 during which SS troops staged an attack on a German radio station and then blamed Polish troops. German operatives dressed in Polish military garb seized the radio station, located near the Polish border, before broadcasting a short propaganda message in Polish. They then killed concentration camp victims who were also dressed in Polish uniforms and left them at the scene, making the incident look like an act of Polish aggression. The very next day Germany invaded Poland, with Hitler citing the incident as one of the pretexts. Nine days before the incident, Hitler had told his generals, “I will provide a

VOL. 3 ISSUE 2 OCTOBER 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM

19


propagandistic casus belli. Its credibility In the 1990′s, when anti-surveillance doesn’t matter. The victor will not be activists and media personalities were asked whether he told the truth.” warning about the NSA’s huge domestic spying operation, they were treated as paranoid conspiracy theorists. Well over a decade before the Snowden revelations, the NSA was busy intercepting and recording all electronic communications across the entire world under the Echelon program. In 1999, the Australian government Conspiracies are not always of a governmental nature, they can also be targeted admitted that they were part of an NSAat consumers. As the BBC reported, led global intercept and surveillance protobacco companies in the United States gram called Echelon in alliance with the were caught deliberately engineering US and Britain that could listen to “every cigarettes for addiction by including international telephone call, fax, e-mail, chemicals that artificially increased the or radio transmission,” on the planet. In addictive kick of the product and made addition, a 2001 European Parliament report stated that “within Europe all it taste better. Clive Bates, director of ASH, said the e-mail, telephone and fax communicadiscovery exposed a “scandal in which tions are routinely intercepted” by the tobacco companies deliberately use addi- NSA. tives to make their bad products even worse”.

6) Tobacco Companies Deliberately Added Addictive Chemicals To Cigarettes

9) CIA Drug Trafficking

7) Operation Fast and Furious Operation Fast and Furious, under which the Obama administration smuggled weapons to Mexican drug lords in an apparent effort to trace the guns and bust the drug gangs, was in fact part of a conspiracy to demonize the second amendment. Documents obtained by CBS News in December 2011 prove that ATF agents discussed how they could tie guns involved in Mexican violence to gun dealers based in the U.S with a view to passing stricter gun control regulations. One law enforcement source told CBS News that the emails suggested the ATF created the problem itself as part of a political ploy. “It’s like ATF created or added to the problem so they could be the solution to it and pat themselves on the back. It’s a circular way of thinking,” the source said.

The Central Intelligence Agency has been implicated in drug trafficking operations all over the world as well as domestically, most notably during the Iran-Contra affair, under which Contra personnel smuggled cocaine into the U.S. with the blessing of the CIA which was then distributed as crack cocaine in Los Angeles, with the profits being funneled back to the Contras. Former Los Angeles Police Department officer Michael Ruppert also testified that he had witnessed CIA drug trafficking. Top Mexican drug lords like Jesus Vicente Zambada Niebla have also gone public to assert that they were hired by the U.S. government for drug trafficking operations. There is a voluminous body of evidence that confirms the CIA and U.S. banking giants are the top players in a global drug trade worth hundreds of billions of dollars a year, information made public by the likes of Gary Webb.

10) The Cia’s Heart 8) Nsa Spying & Mass Attack Gun Surveillance 20

VOL. 3 ISSUE 2 OCTOBER 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM


CIA Document 1035-960 outlined how the term “conspiracy theory” would be weaponized and turned into a pejorative to demonize all dissent.

During Senate testimony in 1975 into illegal activities by the CIA, it was revealed that the agency had developed a dart gun capable of causing a heart attack. “At the first televised hearing, staged in the Senate Caucus Room, Chairman Church dramatically displayed a CIA poison dart gun to highlight the committee’s discovery that the CIA directly violated a presidential order by maintaining stocks of shellfish toxin sufficient to kill thousands,” a Senate web page explains. “The lethal poison then rapidly enters the bloodstream causing a heart attack. Once the damage is done, the poison denatures quickly, so that an autopsy is very unlikely to detect that the heart attack resulted from anything other than natural causes. Sounds like the perfect James Bond weapon, doesn’t it? Yet this is all verifiable in Congressional testimony,” writes Fred Burks.“The dart from this secret CIA weapon can penetrate clothing and leave nothing but a tiny red dot on the skin. On penetration of the deadly dart, the individual targeted for assassination may feel as if bitten by a mosquito, or they may not feel anything at all. The poisonous dart completely disintegrates upon entering the target.” Burks suggests that Mark Pittman, a reporter who predicted the financial crisis and exposed Federal Reserve misdoings which led to a Bloomberg lawsuit against the bankster cartel, may have been assassinated with the CIA weapon.

with a plan to install a fascist dictatorship by force but Butler blew the whistle, exposing the plot during testimony to the United States House of Representatives Special Committee on Un-American Activities. Despite initially having been dismissed as a “gigantic hoax” by the New York Times, the committee concluded that Butler’s allegations were credible, although no one was charged.

12) The FBI crime lab cover-up In the early 1990′s, Dr. Frederic Whitehurst, one of the FBI’s top scientists, blew the whistle on how the FBI was manipulating crime lab data in order to sway trials and frame innocent people who were convicted and sent to prison for crimes they did not commit based on faulty evidence. In 2012 it emerged that the Justice Department had been “withholding information for years about hundreds or even thousands of cases that were tainted by faulty forensic work in the FBI Crime Lab.” A Washington Post exposé found that, “hundreds of defendants nationwide remain in prison or on parole for crimes that might merit exoneration, a retrial or a retesting of evidence using DNA because FBI hair and fiber experts may have misidentified them as suspects.”

11) Fascist Conspiracy 13) The Existence Of The To Overthrow The US Mafia For years, FBI Director J. Edgar Government Hoover denied the very existence of Known as the “Business Plot,” the conspiracy revolved around a scheme to overthrow the President of the United States Franklin D. Roosevelt as part of a coup d’état organized by the heads of Chase Bank, GM, Goodyear, Standard Oil, the DuPont family and Senator Prescott Bush, George W. Bush’s grandfather. The wealthy group approached Marine Corps Major General Smedley Butler

the Mafia. While acknowledging the existence of criminals, many of whom came from Sicily, Hoover refused to entertain the notion that such groups conspired in different areas of the country as part of an organized crime racket. As the New York Times reported, Hoover’s reluctance to accept the existence of the Mafia was likely born out

VOL. 3 ISSUE 2 OCTOBER 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM

21


The men were told they were receiving of the fact that he was “paid off ” to “free health care,” but were not informed keep quiet. they had syphilis and were denied treatment for the disease, as well as receiving painful and unnecessary spinal taps. The experiment wasn’t exposed until 1972, meaning that for 40 years any talk of what happened was easily denounced as a conspiracy theory. Although claims of the government meddling with the environment, food and water supply are routinely dismissed as “conspiracy theories” by mainline talking heads, such a precedent goes right back to the 1920′s, when the FBI deliberately poisoned alcohol in an attempt to enforce In response to media outlets reporting on prohibition laws. alleged cover-ups and scandals involving As ListVerse documents, “Once Prohibi- former U.S. President Bill Clinton, the Clintion went into effect, the FBI saw fit to tons launched a public relations operation enforce it as well as possible, since the that was designed to prevent “mainstream law is the law, and, by adding potentially media” from picking up such stories. fatal impurities to it, endeavored to teach Hillary Clinton invented the pejorative the public that it was going to lose with term “the vast right-wing conspiracy” in Mr. Booze. These impurities included order to discredit such stories and prevent methane, formaldehyde, ammonia, and them from translating from the so-called even arsenic and kerosene.” “new media” to the establishment press. “But the FBI’s usual method, without As World Net Daily’s Joseph Farah notes, informing the populace, of course, was “It’s quite an amazing story….It may all to denature drinkable alcohol, which is have a familiar ring to the tea-party groups called ethanol, by adding rubbing alco- of the 21st century. Clinton got away with hol, which is made of water and propene. it, so it was bound to happen again – and it Propene is distilled from natural gas and most assuredly has.” oil; rubbing alcohol does a fine job cleaning wounds and preventing infection, but will destroy your intestines, kidneys, and liver if you drink it. The FBI also added acetone, which is paint thinner.” The USS Liberty, a United States Navy technical research ship, was attacked and sunk by the Israeli Air Force on 8 June 1967, during the Six-Day War, killing 34 crew members. The Israelis claimed that the attack In 1932, the U.S. government was an error because the ship had been announced that it was going to conduct mistaken for an Egyptian vessel and the tests into the effects of syphilis. 600 poor U.S. government accepted this version of illiterate black men from Tuskegee, Ala- events. However, in 2007 declassified governbama were approached to take part in the program. 399 of the men had contracted ment documents, in addition to recolsyphilis before the experiment began lections of former military personnel, while 201 were not infected with the emerged to indicate that intercepted communications “showed the Israelis disease.

14) The Fbi Poisoned Alcohol During Prohibition

16) The Clintons and the “vast right-wing conspiracy”

17) The USS Liberty

15) The Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment

knew they were attacking an American naval vessel.”

18) Germany’s claim that the Lusitania was carrying munitions Nearly two thousand travelers, including one hundred Americans, were killed on May 7, 1915, when a German U-boat torpedoed the RMS Lusitania, a luxury Cunard Line British ocean liner. Prior to the sinking, the German embassy in Washington issued a warning. Newspapers in the United States refused to print the warning or acknowledge the German claim that the ship carried munitions. Wilson’s government issued a flurry of diplomatic protests after the sinking and exploited the tragedy two years later as a pretext for America to enter the First World War. Nearly a hundred years later, in 2008, divers discovered the Lusitania carried more than four million rounds of rifle ammunition. “There were literally tons and tons of stuff stored in unrefrigerated cargo holds that were dubiously marked cheese, butter and oysters,” Gregg Bemis, an American businessman who owns the rights to the wreck and is funding its exploration, told The Daily Mail.

19) The Lavon Affair In 1954, the Israelis activated a terrorist cell in response to the United States making friends with the Egyptian government and its pan-Arab leader, Gamal Abdel Nasser. The Israelis were worried Nasser would nationalize the Suez Canal and continue Egypt’s blockade of Israeli shipping through the canal. Israeli Prime Minister David Ben Gurion decided a false flag terrorist attack on American interests in Egypt would sour



the new relationship. He recruited and dispatched a terror cell that pretended to be Egyptian terrorists. The plan, however, contained a fatal flaw. Israel’s top secret cell, Unit 131, was infiltrated by Egyptian intelligence. After a member of the cell was arrested and interrogated, he revealed the plot and this led to more arrests. Israeli agents were subjected to a public trial revealing details of the plan to firebomb the U.S. Information Agency’s libraries, a British-owned Metro-Goldwyn Mayer theatre, a railway terminal, the central post office, and other targets. In order to deflect blame, the Israeli government tried to frame its own Defense Minister, Pinhas Lavon, but the true nature of the plot was eventually made public.

20) Geoengineering For years, the establishment media denied that geoengineering projects were taking place, despite the claims of many researchers linking the phenomenon of “chemtrails” to atmosphere manipulation programs. However, towards the end of the last decade, numerous geoengineering projects which were centered around injecting the upper atmosphere with artificial substances were made public, such as those at the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE) Savannah River National Laboratory in Aiken, S.C, which in 2009 began

24

conducting studies which involved shooting huge amounts of particulate matter, in this case “porous-walled glass microspheres,” into the stratosphere. The notion that governments are spending millions on artificially engineering the climate can no longer be dismissed as a conspiracy theory. The Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Program was created in 1989 with funding from the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and is sponsored by the DOE’s Office of Science and managed by the Office of Biological and Environmental Research. One of ARM’s programs, entitled Indirect and Semi-Direct Aerosol Campaign (ISDAC), is aimed at measuring “cloud simulations” and “aerosol retrievals”. Another program under the Department of Energy’s Atmospheric Science Program is directed towards, “developing comprehensive understanding of the atmospheric processes that control the transport, transformation, and fate of energy related trace chemicals and particulate matter.” The DOE website states that, “The current focus of the program is aerosol radiative forcing of climate: aerosol formation and evolution and aerosol properties that affect direct and indirect influences on climate and climate change.”

VOL. 3 ISSUE 2 OCTOBER 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM


VOL. 3 ISSUE 2 OCTOBER 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM

25


WRITTEN BY KUR T N I MMO

House Approves Plan to Arm and Train ISIS to Fight ISIS Syrian “rebels” are virtually all members of ISIS and al-Qaeda

T

here is a problem with this: there are few if any “moderate” Syrian “rebels” to arm and train. In other words, Obama and Congress will arm and train ISIS and other al-Qaeda inspired radical Wahabist groups.

No Such Thing As A Moderate, Secular Rebel Group

Even The New York Times dispelled the myth there is such a thing as a secular and moderate opposition to the Syrian government. “Nowhere in rebel-controlled Syria is there a secular fighting force to speak of,” Ben Hubbard wrote for the newspaper on April 27, 2013. “My sense is that there are no seculars,” Elizabeth O’Bagy, of the Institute for the Study of War, told the Times. “Syria’s revolution is devouring its children, and ISIS is the devourer,” Joshua Landis, director of the Center of Middle East Studies at the University of Oklahoma, told The Christian Science Monitor last November. Much of the establishment media pretends the “moderate” Free Syrian Army (FSA) is secular and democratic. This is not merely a distortion, it is outright propaganda designed to mislead. Stephen Gowans writes: You don’t have to be committed to a secular society to belong to the FSA. Indeed, according to Reuters, the organization’s military command is “Islamist dominated”. The Associated Press says that “Many of the participating groups have strong Islamist agendas, and some have fought in ways that could scare away Western backers. They include the Tawheed Brigade, whose ideology is similar to that of the Muslim Brotherhood, and the Falcons of Damascus, an ultraconservative Islamist group.” The Wall Street Journal reports that Brig. Gen. Mithkal Albtaish, an FSA leader, says that the organization is “dominated by Islamist groups that are in close coordination with al Nusra,” the al-Qaeda aligned terrorist group. The idea, then, that the FSA is secular is mistaken. Al-Nusra and ISIS merged in June. Factions within the FSA

On September 17th, the House of Representatives approved Obama’s plan to train and arm “moderate Syrian rebels to counter the growing threat of the Islamic State organization,” according to The Washington Post.


Arming and training ISIS to fight ISIS is not fully supported in Congress, however. Obama’s proposal is opposed by 40 percent of Democrats who are concerned it will merely extend and exacerbate hostilities in the Middle East. This is, despite the thin veneer of establishment propaganda, exactly what the plan is designed to do. Neocon Republicans in the House, on the other hand, support the plan. In fact, they believe Obama’s plan is far too timid and does not go far enough. Disregarding the Constitution (Article 1, Section 8), one “top GOP leader suggested that Congress could give the president blanket military authority, even if Obama doesn’t want it, when lawmakers hold a much broader debate after the November elections about the fight against Islamist The CIA has shipped weapons to the militants,” the Post reports. al-Qaeda groups in Syria since at least 2012, a fact also revealed by The New York Times. The shipments included, as of March last year, more than 160 military cargo flights by Jordanian, Saudi Despite the reservations of a large and Qatari military cargo planes landing at Esenboga Airport near Ankara and minority of Democrats, both parties other Turkish and Jordanian airports. The support arming and training ISIS to fight effort to arm al-Nusra – now fully merged ISIS and ensuring the war on terror conwith ISIS – and other jihadist groups is tinues indefinitely, or at least until the US government collapses as a result of coordinated by American intelligence: From offices at secret locations, Ameri- internal contradictions and the weight of can intelligence officers have helped the an astronomical debt. House Speaker John Boehner and Arab governments shop for weapons, including a large procurement from Cro- Senate Minority leader Mitch McConatia, and have vetted rebel commanders nell “have been working together on a and groups to determine who should cross-chamber strategy designed to keep receive the weapons as they arrive, their party ranks united and move swiftly according to American officials speaking toward passage of the measure,” according to the Post. on the condition of anonymity. “The House is expected to grant Obama In addition to arming ISIS in Syria, the US Army has trained the jihadists how to the short-term authority as part of an use the weapons. “Members of the Islamic amendment to a larger measure funding State of Iraq and the Levant, or ISIS, were federal agencies that is expected to pass trained in 2012 by US instructors work- after it is debated Tuesday and Wednesing at a secret base in Jordan, according day, GOP leadership aides said. Once the to informed Jordanian officials,” Aaron House votes, the Senate would take up the issue by next week before adjourning Klein wrote in June. for the elections.” have pledged allegiance to ISIS, including Ahl Al Athar, Ibin al-Qa’im, and Aisha. Around 20,000 FSA mercenaries were trained by the US and were the recipients of rockets and TOW anti-tank missiles supplied through back-channels in Qatar and Saudi Arabia. FSA members have defected to al-Nusra in droves. “The FSA’s Ahrar al-Shimal brigade joined al-Nusra en masse while the Sufiyan al-Thawri brigade in Idlib lost 65 of its fighters to al-Nusra a few months ago for lack of weapons. According to one estimate the FSA has lost a quarter of all its fighters,” The Guardian reported in May, 2013.

Cia Provides The Weapons

Neocon groups take to Twitter and demand forever war.

Support For Obama’s Plan Marginal

VOL. 3 ISSUE 2 OCTOBER 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM

27


WRITTEN BY STEVE WATSON

War Propaganda Works: Large Majority Of Americans Now Want Military Action In Syria, Iraq Complete Turnaround On Attitudes Of One Year Ago

I

n a complete 180 degree turnaround, a sizeable majority of Americans now want the government to engage in military action in Syria and Iraq, following the brutal beheading of an American journalist, and other stories of atrocities committed by ISIS terrorists. A YouGov poll released this week, found that four times as many Americans now support US led military action than oppose it. The survey notes that 63 percent of Americans back airstrikes in Syria, while 16 percent do not. Just one year ago, as the Obama administration campaigned for military action in Syria against President Bashar Assad’s troops, the numbers were almost exactly reversed, as 60 percent opposed military action with only 20 percent declaring support.

Ironically, any US military action in Syria will be sold on the exact opposite reasoning, that militant Islamic rebels are taking over the country. Last year, US airstrikes were proposed to help the rebels fighting against the Syrian government. The latest survey also shows that support for military action is spread across political divides, with 60 percent of Democrats, 60 percent of independents and 76 percent of Republicans declaring support for military action against ISIS. “Attitudes towards the use of military force in Syria have changed significantly over the past year.” YouGov’s analysis of the findings states. “In September 2013, when a deal to disarm Syria’s chemical weapons was agreed, 62% of Americans opposed the use of military force while only 20% supported it. Today when asked whether they support the use of military

force against ISIS militants in Syria, the situation is reversed.” In addition, YouGov notes that “support for military action has increased significantly despite the fact that expectations of deeper US involvement remain the same.” This is due to the fact that the latest figures show 40 percent of Americans said that strikes would be the first step towards having US troops in Syria. In 2013, that figure was 45 percent, just a five point difference. The flip in Americans’ attitudes comes in the wake of the James Foley beheading video being used by the government and the mainstream media as a poster child to reinvigorate support behind a military attack on Syria, almost exactly a year after a dubious chemical weapons attack was exploited for the same purpose. As Infowars reported, top forensic

The Flip In Americans’ Attitudes Comes In The Wake Of The James Foley Beheading Video Being Used By The Government And The Mainstream Media As A Poster Child To Reinvigorate Support Behind A Military Attack On Syria, Almost Exactly A Year After A Dubious Chemical Weapons Attack Was Exploited For The Same Purpose.

28

VOL. 3 ISSUE 2 OCTOBER 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM


experts have concluded that the alleged beheading was likely “staged” and that the footage in the clip does not show the execution of Foley. Despite this, the footage has continued to be paraded as a casus belli for expanding U.S. military operations. It seems that previous massive public and political opposition to America’s involvement in the region has now been offset. In Iraq too, where support for military action has been consistently low and dwindling for a long period, a majority, 64 percent, now back airstrikes, with

only 20 percent opposed. Over the weekend, the Obama administration green lighted airstrikes in Iraq under the War Powers Resolution, which gives presidents authorization for temporary military action. Democrat leaders, including Sen. Dianne Feinstein, head of the Senate Intelligence Committee, also openly declared their backing for military action on the weekend news network shows.

VOL. 3 ISSUE 2 OCTOBER 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM

29


WRITTEN BY KUR T N I MMO

Obama’s Long ISIS War: It Will Take Years and Kill Thousands Continuation Of “Creative Destruction” Under The War On Terror Banner

T

he New York Times, long the preferred conduit for war propaganda, has laid out Obama’s plan to defeat ISIS, aka the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria. The administration warns the effort will take years to complete and continue after Obama has left office. The first phase a sustained air campaign will, the Times claims, roll back ISIS gains in northern and western Iraq. Details on how this will work minus ground troops is not explained. Next, the United States will shuffle around the government in Iraq to make it “more inclusive.” This is total blue sky. Following the U.S. invasion and the toppling and eventual execution of strongman and former CIA operative Saddam Hussein, Iraq predictably descended into sectarian violence. This was planned. “What is unfolding is a process of ‘constructive chaos,’ engineered by the West,” writes Julie Lévesque. “The destabilization of Iraq and its fragmentation has been planned long ago and is part of the “Anglo-American-Israeli ‘military road map’ in the Middle East,” an effort introduced during the Bush administration and coined the “New Middle East” by then U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice. The final element of Obama’s supposed plan to deal with ISIS calls for a de facto invasion of Syria. The Pentagon estimates this part of the plan will take at least 36 months.

30

Of course, the Pentagon is notorious for issuing such off the wall figures. Back in 2002, as the U.S. prepared for an invasion of Iraq — ultimate death toll, over a million people — then Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld declared the invasion would be mercifully short. “The idea that it’s going to be a long, long, long battle of some kind I think is belied by the fact of what happened in 1990,” he said, making a reference to the previous invasion of Iraq. “Five days or five weeks or five months, but it certainly isn’t going to last any longer than that,” he said. “It won’t be a World War III.” Following the official timeline the Iraq War lasted nearly nine years, making it the third longest war in U.S. history. The War in Afghanistan lasted just over 13 years and the Vietnam War nearly 11. By contrast, U.S. participation in the Second World War ended after 3.7 years. The U.S. admits the obviously unworkable plan to get rid of ISIS is unprecedented. From the Times: The military campaign Mr. Obama is preparing has no obvious precedent. Unlike American counterterrorism operations in Yemen and Pakistan, it is not expected to be limited to drone strikes against militant leaders. Unlike the war in Afghanistan, it will not include the use of ground troops, which Mr. Obama has ruled out. Unlike the Kosovo war that President Bill Clinton and NATO nations waged

VOL. 3 ISSUE 2 OCTOBER 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM


in 1999, it will not be compressed into an intensive 78-day tactical and strategic air campaign. And unlike during the air campaign that toppled the Libyan leader, Col. Muammar el-Qaddafi, in 2011, the Obama administration is no longer “leading from behind,” but plans to play the central role in building a coalition to counter ISIS. Like the so-called “Kosovo war” and the first Iraq invasion, the war against ISIS, an enemy created by the United States and its partners in the Middle East, will be a war against civilians.

ISIS Will Live to Fight Another Day Faced with U.S. air power and sustained bombing raids, ISIS will melt back into the civilian population. “A Reuters examination of three weeks of U.S. air strikes reveals significant changes in the way the ISIS operates since the U.S. joined the struggle against them, with fewer militants on the streets of Mosul the clearest sign,” Isabel Coles and Peter Apps reported for Reuters last week. “ISIS cannot hide the heavy equipment it captured (like howitzers, trucks and tanks) if it uses them in battle, and it can’t hide them or protect them from attack unless perhaps it brings them into populated areas,” notes Michael S. Rozeff. “ISIS is also spread thin and vulnerable to an opposition force that relies on maneuverability and operational initiative. These weaknesses suggest that ISIS will pull in its horns for a while and go back to hit and run truck bomb tactics. This means that a conventional victory against ISIS won’t be possible… ISIS cannot be defeated militarily as Obama’s rhetoric suggests.” The U.S. ran out of military targets within the first few days of the 2003

invasion of Iraq. It then concentrated on civilian infrastucutre and so-called “dual-use” targets — electrical power, media, and telecommunications installations. The targeting of civilian infrastructure was more extensive during the first Iraq invasion and included a wide range of civilian targets from electric power generation and water treatment to food processing and distribution facilities and markets and even historical sites.

A Continuation of “Creative Destruction” in the Middle East Reducing nations to failed state status is a specialty of the U.S. military and the process of “constructive chaos” will continue and likely be amplified during the ISIS phase of the clash of civilizations war. In addition to further balkanizing Iraq along religious and sectarian lines, the ISIS war will strive to take down the al-Assad government in Syria and import balkanization and, through poverty and thirdworldization, finlandization (pacification). The ultimate objective was outlined by the World Tribunal on Iraq. Its conclusions, reached in 2005, were ignored by the war propaganda media, including The New York Times. The tribunal argued from Istanbul that the U.S. and its partners had engaged “…in policies to wage permanent war on sovereign nations. Syria and Iran have already been declared as potential targets. In declaring a ‘global war on terror,’ the US government has given itself the exclusive right to use aggressive military force against any target of its choosing. Ethnic and religious hostilities are being fueled in different parts of the world.”

VOL. 3 ISSUE 2 OCTOBER 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM

31


32

VOL. 3 ISSUE 2 OCTOBER 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM


VOL. 3 ISSUE 2 OCTOBER 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM

33


WRITTEN BY PAUL J O S E PH WATS O N

Obama Ignores Congress Again to Launch Syria Attack With No Legal Basis President commits impeachable offense

P

resident Barack Obama has once again flagrantly violated the U.S. constitution by launching air strikes on Syrian territory under the justification of an illegal framework and with no Congressional input whatsoever. In a move that threatens to enflame the entire region, Washington launched a wave of Tomahawk cruise missile attacks against ISIS targets on Septermber 22. Early reports indicate that eight civilians, including three children, were killed during an aerial bombardment on the city of Raqqa. Despite the administration enjoying widespread support for its military campaign against ISIS, with nearly two thirds of Americans advocating air strikes within Syrian territory, suspicions are rife that Washington will subsequently turn its weapons against the Assad regime, which it has been trying to overthrow for more than two years. Whatever the necessity and justification of the campaign against ISIS, Obama’s decision to once again ignore Congress, just as he did before the ultimately disastrous attack on Libya, reinforces the precedent of the White House launching military action with absolutely no legal foundation whatsoever. Shortly after reports of U.S. air strikes

34

on Syria emerged, Congressman Justin Amash also summed up the feelings of some lawmakers to Congressional leaders’ failure to engage in a vigorous debate about the new conflict. Although Congress recently voted to approve a plan to arm so-called “moderate” Syrian rebels (many of whom are aligned with or have sold weapons to ISIS), lawmakers did not give the green light to launch air strikes. “What Congress never did was to specifically authorize a war,” writes Lynn Sweet. “The chain of events starting with attacks in Syria may dilute pressure for another authorization vote. No matter what happens in the midterms, Congress may be hesitant to deny Obama war authorization when in fact the U.S. is again at war.” President Obama claims that he has legal justification to attack ISIS based on the same 2001 authorization to use military force (AUMF) that preceded the war on terror. However, as W. James Antle notes, that law only covers “those nations, organizations, or persons” that “planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, or harbored such organizations or persons.” “On its face this is an implausible argument because the 2001 AUMF requires a nexus to al Qaeda or associated forces of al Qaeda fighting the

VOL. 3 ISSUE 2 OCTOBER 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM


United States,” Robert Chesney, a professor at the University of Texas School of Law, told The Daily Beast. “Since ISIS broke up with al Qaeda it’s hard to make that argument.” Prior to the attack on Libya, Obama brazenly undermined the power of Congress by insisting his authority came from the United Nations Security Council and that Congressional approval was not necessary. “I don’t even have to get to the Constitutional question,” scoffed the President. This time around, Obama hasn’t even bothered to get a rubber stamp from the UN, nor has he even addressed the notion that Congress should have a say in deciding whether America should commit itself to another military campaign which could easily expand into a full blown conflict given the Assad government’s vow that it will treat any U.S. military action within its territory as an act of war. According to Congressman Walter Jones, Obama’s failure to obtain Congressional approval for the 2011 attack on Libya constituted “an impeachable high crime and misdemeanor under article II, section 4 of the Constitution.” By once again snubbing Congress, Obama has brazenly violated the constitution and committed yet another impeachable offense.

VOL. 3 ISSUE 2 OCTOBER 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM

35


Retired 4-Star General Wesley Clark was clear: Syria’s demise was set in 2001, only months after the world changed on 9/11.

36

VOL. 3 ISSUE 2 OCTOBER 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM


WRITTEN BY M I KA E L THAL E N

T

his famous revelation was revealed during a 2007 interview in which Clark laid out the West’s entire middle eastern policy, specifically noting the future overthrows of Libya and Syria, long before Barack Obama stepped foot into the White House. “About 10 days after 9/11, I went through the Pentagon, and I saw Secretary Rumsfeld and Deputy Secretary Wolfowitz. I went downstairs just to say hello to some of the people on the joint staff who used to work for me, and one of the generals called me in. He said, ‘Sir, you’ve got to come in and talk to me a second.’ I said, ‘Well, you’re too busy.’ He said, ‘No, no.’ He says, ‘We’ve made the decision we’re going to war with Iraq.’ This was on or about the 20th of September. I said, ‘We’re going to war with Iraq? Why?’ He said, ‘I don’t know.’ He said, ‘I guess they don’t know what else to do.’ So I said, ‘Well, did they find some information connecting Saddam to al-Qaeda?’ He said, ‘No, no.’ He says, ‘There’s nothing new that way. They just made the decision to go to war

with Iraq.’ He said, ‘I guess it’s like we don’t know what to do about terrorists, but we’ve got a good military and we can take down governments.’” “So I came back to see him a few weeks later, and by that time we were bombing in Afghanistan. I said, ‘Are we still going to war with Iraq?’ And he said, ‘Oh, it’s worse than that.’ He said—he reached over on his desk. He picked up a piece of paper, and he said, ‘I just got this down from upstairs,’ meaning the secretary of defense’s office, ‘today.’ And he said, ‘This is a memo that describes how we’re going to take out seven countries in five years, starting with Iraq, and then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and, finishing off, Iran.’ I said, ‘Is it classified?’ He said, ‘Yes, sir.’ I said, ‘Well, don’t show it to me.’ And I saw him a year or so ago, and I said, ‘You remember that?’ He said, ‘Sir, I didn’t show you that memo! I didn’t show it to you!’” In the years to follow, the American public would be acclimated to this classified agenda, all under the guise of humanitarian intervention. In reality, the covert plan would be

used to destabilize the entire region, ensuring a Western presence around the remaining “rogue states.” With a war-weary public, proxy armies have become a valuable tool - using foreign fighters to keep American boots out of controversial conflicts. Throughout the overthrow of Libya, this policy saw unprecedented support, with few questioning the ideological leanings of the “Libyan rebels.” Despite attempts to paint these so-called rebels with a barrage of politically-correct buzzwords, the true nature of these “freedom fighters” would quickly emerge. During a 2011 interview with Italian newspaper Il Sole 24 Ore, Libyan rebel leader Abdel-Hakim al-Hasidi admitted that many of his fighters had previously killed American soldiers in Iraq. Al-Hasidi went on to call his jihadists “patriots and good Muslims” before openly praising Al Qaeda. Growing greater in strength and number, the jihadist rebels’ savage tactics and disdain for innocent life did little to deter President Obama’s support. The group only received

VOL. 3 ISSUE 2 OCTOBER 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM

37


Faced with unprecedented backlash from the public, which even halted a major military offensive against the Syrian government, the Obama administration quickly devised a way to steer the public back in their favor: ISIS.

increased funding and praise as black Africans, targeted specifically by the jihadists for their race, were executed and dumped into heaping piles across the country. “Around 30 men lay decomposing in the heat. Many of them had their hands tied behind their back, either with plastic handcuffs or ropes. One had a scarf stuffed into his mouth. Almost all of the victims were black men,” reporters with The Independent noted from one such incident in Tripoli. President Obama’s September 2013 decision to waive a provision from the Arms Export Control Act, a law designed to stop the arming of terrorists groups by the government, erased any doubt that ignorance was responsible for the terrorists’ rise. A large Al Qaeda flag planted on top of the Benghazi courthouse by rebels in late October 2011 appeared to symbolically announce the country’s impending demise. Libya, a country that once touted the highest standard of living in Africa, would soon be deemed a “failed state.” Surveying their success in convincing the public to support the most vicious Al Qaeda terrorists in the world, the Obama administration moved to duplicate the process in Syria with the backing of Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and Qatar. Unlike Libya, the “freedom fighting” cloak used to pacify the public quickly unravelled as the newly-branded “Syrian rebels” began exhibiting their extreme bloodlust. In May of 2013, Americans were shocked to learn that one of their beloved freedom fighters had been filmed



eating a soldiers internal organs. Abu Sakkar, the Syrian rebel commander responsible, defended his actions during a 2013 BBC interview. “I didn’t want to do this. I had to,” Sakkar said. “We have to terrify the enemy, humiliate them, just as they do to us. Now, they won’t dare be wherever Abu Sakkar is.” During the same time period, Syrian rebels even proudly posted video to Youtube showing a young child beheading an unarmed prisoner. Faced with unprecedented backlash from the public, which even halted a major military offensive against the Syrian government, the Obama administration quickly devised a way to steer the public back in their favor: ISIS. By simply labeling US-backed rebel jihadists as ISIS, atrocities once cov- FREDA ered up by the establishment could now be used for political gain. Radical jihadists from every corner of the middle east, complete with U.S. military vehicles, weapons and training, were now President Obama’s key to complete military intervention. Despite more than 90 percent of the rebels admittedly adopting the ISIS banner, the public would still support arming ISIS to fight ISIS. “We are collaborating with the Islamic State (ISIS) and the Nusra Front by attacking the Syrian Army’s gatherings in… Qalamoun,” Free Syrian Army Commander Bassel said early September. Retired Syrian Army Colonel Abu Fidaa

40

also acknowledged the seamless integration between the rebels and ISIS. “A very large number of FSA members [in Arsal] have joined ISIS and Nusra,” Fidaa said. While many in the public have failed to make the connection, members of the military community have not. “We backed I believe in some cases, some of the wrong people and not in the right part of the Free Syrian Army and that’s a little confusing to people, so I’ve always maintained… that we were backing the wrong types,” Retired United States Air Force Lieutenant General Thomas McInerney recently stated. Similarly, Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul noted the Obama administration’s direct involvement in the rise of ISIS during a recent Senate debate. “We gave 600 tons of weapons to the Syrian rebels in 2013 alone,” Paul said, asking why “ISIS grew stronger during the time we gave more weapons.” President Obama’s United Nations ambassador Samantha Power stated the actual agenda during an interview with NBC’s Chuck Todd when she revealed that the fight against ISIS would also be used to overthrow Assad and the Syrian government. The fear-gripped public’s willingness to support any policy in the false name of destroying ISIS has undoubtedly emboldened the covert 2001 plan. The only question is, will Americans and the rest of the world catch on before it’s too late?

VOL. 3 ISSUE 2 OCTOBER 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM


VOL. 3 ISSUE 2 OCTOBER 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM

41


Angry McCain Admits Meeting With ISIS, Scolds Rand Paul For Not Knowing Terrorists WRITTEN BY STEVE WATSON

I

n a weak effort to smear Rand Paul, war hawk Senator John McCain attempted to argue that the Kentucky Senator doesn’t have the authority to disagree with US policies regarding ISIS because he hasn’t met up with members of the terror group, unlike McCain himself. In an appearance on Fox News, McCain was asked to respond to Paul’s comments earlier in the day, when the libertarian leaning Senator told CBS’ This Morning that arming Syrian rebels would only empower ISIS in the long run. And that’s when things got weird. “Has Rand Paul ever been to Syria? Has he ever met with ISIS? Has he ever met with any of these people? No, no, no,” McCain said, clearly in reference to his own visit to Syria in 2013, where he was photographed with leaders of the Free Syrian Army, the fighters violently opposed to the Assad regime. Don’t attempt to look for any logic in McCain’s blathering, because there isn’t any. This is not the first time McCain has attempted to make this idiotic argument. When intelligence emerged that up to 40 percent of the “moderate” rebels are actually extremists, McCain argued that the claims were not true because he has personally met the rebels. “I know who they are. I was in Syria and I met them.” McCain said at the time. “There’s about 70 percent still who are Free Syrian Army,” he claimed, despite the fact that a study by defense consultancy IHS Jane’s found that only around 30 percent of rebels are fighting for secular values.

McCain, who has long pushed to arm Syrian rebels, declared that it is “patently false” to claim that arms supplied to the so called “moderate” militants have actually wound up with Islamic State in Iraq and Syria terrorists. “We’re going to have a fight, because it’s patently false. This is the same Rand Paul that said we didn’t want to have anything to do with anything to do in the Middle East, by the way. I don’t want to get in a fight with him at all.” McCain said. Of course, actual independent evidence and reports of arms winding up in ISIS hands do exist, and it is a real problem, even if McCain chooses to close his eyes and ignore it, or willfully lie about it. His scolding of Rand Paul for referencing such evidence is laughable. During his Fox News appearance, McCain also claimed that it is “not true” that the moderate Syrian rebels have agreed a nonaggression pact with ISIS, another factor Rand Paul brought up. McCain did not , however, present any evidence to counter media reports based on intelligence shared by UK rights groups indicating this is indeed the case. McCain also claimed that no other Arab country has declared support for US airstrikes on ISIS, despite a White House announcement claiming it has such support. It seems that McCain just repeats whatever information it is that he wants to believe, regardless of what the rest of the planet is learning.


SLIP-UP? MCCAIN SAYS “NATIONAL SECURITY TEAM RECOMMENDED ARMING ISIS”

A

WRITTEN BY MIKA EL THALEN

rizona Sen. John McCain made an interesting comment regarding the federal government’s policy towards the ISIS terrorist during an appearance on Fox

group News. In an interview with Greta Van Susteran, McCain mentions a meeting the President held with his national security team in which all members reportedly “recommended arming ISIS.” “Hillary Clinton has described already the meeting in the White House over two years ago… everyone in the national security team recommended arming ISIS and the President, by himself, turned it down,” McCain said. The comment follows a question from Susteran regarding the arming of the “Free Syrian Army,” making McCain’s statement appear to be a simple Freudian slip. While some reports have taken the remark out of context, McCain’s unintended comment regarding ISIS still remains completely factual. Despite McCain falsely claiming that the President declined to arm the group, the pairs’ direct involvement in the rise of ISIS, a name simply referring to Al Qaeda in Iraq, is undeniable. McCain has worked feverishly with the Obama administration for the last several years to arm radical jihadists across the region in an admitted decades-long plan to overthrow the governments of several countries including Iraq, Libya and Syria. As far back as March 2011, McCain was cheerleading the CIA’s plans to provide support to the “Libyan rebels” even as Libyan rebel leader Abdel-Hakim al-Hasidi admitted to working with Al Qaeda. Only months later, those same “rebels”

would place an Al Qaeda flag on top of the courthouse in Benghazi. Just last year, McCain traveled to Syria to meet with senior members of the Asifat al-Shamal Brigade as well as the Free Syrian Army, two groups that have admittedly “pledged allegiance to Al Qaeda” as well. Widespread controversy was sparked after several of the men at the secret meeting were found to be radicals accused of recently kidnapping 11 Lebanese pilgrims. Despite McCain and Obama’s never-ending claims of only supporting “moderate rebels,” Free Syrian Army commander Jamal Maarouf admitted in 2014 that his fighters regularly fight alongside Al Qaeda, the same Al Qaeda now “merging” with ISIS on the Syria-Iraq border. Thousands of jihadists were even trained by US instructors at a secret base in neighboring Jordan before fleeing to Iraq to join ISIS according to one Jordanian official. Similarly, a recent PBS News report featured jihadists who admitted to being trained in Qatar by US forces. The backlash against McCain’s unfettered support of radical jihadist terrorists came to a head in 2013 when a U.S. Marine confronted McCain at a town hall meeting in Arizona and accused the senator of treason. Only hours before McCain’s statement on Fox News, retired United States Air Force Lieutenant General Thomas McInerney stated that “we helped build ISIS” during a similar interview with the network. “We backed I believe in some cases, some of the wrong people and not in the right part of the Free Syrian Army and that’s a little confusing to people, so I’ve always maintained… that we were backing the wrong types,” McInerney said. Now, with ISIS gaining ground and new fighters by the day, McCain and President Obama remain fixated on bombing Syria to allegedly stop the ISIS threat they helped create instead of the reported ISIS threat at the US-Mexico border.


WRITTEN BY KURT NIMMO

HuffPo: Raise Taxes and Bring Back Draft to Fight ISIS Lib-Left Establishment Calls For Sacrifice In The Name Of The State

A

ccording to Goodman, we’re a nation of selfish sloths, television watchers who expect a volunteer army to fight our existential battles. “It’s time to get off the couch, America, and collectively sacrifice for national security, both through taxes to fund the next conflict and a draft, like previous generations in WWII, Korea, and Vietnam,” he writes. Goodman runs to Jon Meacham, a CFR insider, who argued back in 2012 for a return to conscripted slavery, otherwise known as the draft, in order to fight the empire’s wars. Body bags, missing limbs, PTSD and all the other horrors of large scale organized mass murder are a small price to pay to protect America against enemies of its own making. He quotes R. Russell Rumbaugh, a military analyst at the CIA, who took the pages of the nation’s premier war propaganda broadsheet, The New York Times, to argue we couch-sitters are under taxed and a “permanent tax surcharge to pay for wars” is required to “ensure that we… achieve our interests throughout the world.” Rumbaugh, of course, believes the interests of the CFR and the American people are one and the same.

It is hardly surprising this screed in favor of forever war and endless sacrifice to the state appears at the Huffington Post, supposedly a bastion of lib-left political thought. It is, instead, another crafty corporate front peddling propaganda for the state and wars that centralize its power and enrich its bankster and corporatist overlords. HuffPo is owned by AOL, the corporate leviathan that sucked up Time Warner, and was owned by Arianna Huffington, the right-left chameleon who, according to Adam Davidson, “conned progressives with the promise of a new, different, post-ideological model — and then delivering a cold hard dish of the same old exploitation, betrayal and hypocrisy.” Libs, of course, should have seen this coming when they saw Huffington team up with Ken Lerer, the flack who covered for the poster child of a criminal financial class and the epitome of Wall Street corruption, Michael Milken. There is very little difference between the so-called right and left sides of the establishment political spectrum when it comes down to war. There is a dedicated, albeit heavily marginalized and routinely ignored, antiwar faction located at the outer fringes of the Democrat party. Republicans have

begrudgingly allowed a small and equally marginalized libertarian and Ron Paulian antiwar faction in their oligarchic club, but it does not dent the war pig domination of the party. Remember, many of the wars over the last sixty or so years were initiated by Democrats, most notoriously Vietnam inaugurated by Lyndon Johnson (who used a classic false flag to get things rolling). Obama’s ISIS war and the vastly exaggerated threat supposedly posed to the heartland by Islamists — in fact Wahhabist Salafi-Takfiri, or apostates who deviate from mainstream Sunni Islam — is merely the latest scam perpetuated by the military-industrial complex and its neocon intelligentsia to keep war going forever. The grossly over-cooked Islam threat was devised in the late 1970s as the U.S. worked to take down the supposed Soviet threat and supplant it with another, more permanent enemy. ISIS, IS,ISIL, whatever tag you affix, is wholly a creation of the CIA, British and Israeli intelligence, and their partners in Saudi Arabia, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates, Kuwait and Turkey. It does not pose a threat to America and does not require more confiscation of wealth and forced conscription at gunpoint.

H.A. Goodman, a regular at The Huffington Post, Salon and a former State Department employee, believes the only way to fight the Islamic State is to confiscate more hardearned dollars from the American people and bring back conscription. 44

VOL. 3 ISSUE 2 OCTOBER 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM


VOL. 3 ISSUE 2 OCTOBER 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM

45


WRITTEN BY M I KAE L T HAL E N

CIA Admitted to Staging Fake Jihadist Videos in 2010 Questions Arise After Experts Say Foley ISIS Beheading Video Likely “Staged”

A

2010 Washington Post article authored by former Army Intelligence Officer Jeff Stein features a detailed account of how the CIA admittedly filmed a fake Bin Laden video during the run up to the 2003 Iraq war. The article, which includes comments from multiple sources within the CIA’s Iraq Operations Group, explains how the agency had planned to “flood Iraq with the videos” depicting several controversial scenarios. “The agency actually did make a video purporting to show Osama bin Laden and his cronies sitting around a campfire swigging bottles of liquor and savoring their conquests with boys, one of the former CIA officers recalled, chuckling at the memory,” the article states. “The actors were drawn from ‘some of us darker-skinned employees.’” Other CIA officials admitted to planning several fake videos featuring former Iraqi President Saddam Hussein, one of which would depict the leader engaged in sexual acts with a teenage boy. “It would look like it was taken by a hidden camera,” said one of the former officials. “Very grainy, like it was a secret videotaping of a sex session.” According to one official, the video ideas were eventually scrapped due to the CIA officers, who spent their

46

careers in Latin America and East Asia, not understanding “the cultural nuances of the region.” “Saddam playing with boys would have no resonance in the Middle East — nobody cares,” a third former CIA official said. “Trying to mount such a campaign would show a total

misunderstanding of the target. We always mistake our own taboos as universal when, in fact, they are just our taboos.” The article does however admit that one specific psyop was successfully implemented, linking to a document from the Rand Corporation that explains the program. “According to histories of the 2003

invasion, the single most effective ‘information warfare’ project, which originated in the Pentagon, was to send faxes and e-mails to Iraqi unit commanders as the fighting began, telling them their situation was hopeless, to round up their tanks, artillery and men, and go home,” the article states. “Many did.” While the aforementioned videos were never released, the much looked over admission of such psychological operations raises questions in light of the recent ISIS beheading videos. Only days after Infowars’ questioned several discrepancies in the James Foley beheading video, top British forensic experts concluded that the video was likely staged using “camera trickery and slick post-production techniques.” “After enhancements, the knife can be seen to be drawn across the upper neck at least six times, with no blood evidence to the point the picture fades to black,” an analyst said.”I think it has been staged. My feeling is that the execution may have happened after the camera was stopped.” Given the brutality seen in many of ISIS’ grainy, low quality cell phone videos from Iraq and Syria, many have also begun questioning why the “beheading” video’s hide the actual beheading while also exhibiting more advanced editing techniques and high definition cameras.

VOL. 3 ISSUE 2 OCTOBER 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM


“The agency actually did make a video purporting to show osama bin laden and his cronies sitting around a campfire swigging bottles of liquor and savoring their conquests with boys, one of the former cia officers recalled, chuckling at the memory,” the article states. “The actors were drawn from ‘some of us darker-skinned employees.” While no one questions the tragic fate of both James Foley and Steven Sotloff, other questions have been raised in light of who discovered the most recent video: the SITE Intelligence Group (Search for International Terrorist Entities). “One of SITE’s founders, Rita Katz, is a government insider with close connections to former terrorism czar Richard Clarke and his staff in the White House, as well as investigators in the Department of Justice, Department of the Treasury, and the Department of Homeland Security according to SourceWatch,” notes Infowars’ Kurt Nimmo. The most glaring issue still remains the United States government’s involvement in creating ISIS, recently pointed out by General Thomas McInerney. “We backed I believe in some cases, some of the wrong people and not in the right part of the Free Syrian Army and that’s a little confusing to people, so I’ve always maintained….that we were backing the wrong types,” McInerney said. While the Obama Administration admits to having no strategy against ISIS, internal sources claim the President has received intelligence on their rise for more than a year. Even as reports come in on possible ISIS attacks in the Southern US, the President still refuses to secure the border as border gates are left wide open.

VOL. 3 ISSUE 2 OCTOBER 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM

47


48

VOL. 3 ISSUE 2 OCTOBER 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM


VOL. 3 ISSUE 2 OCTOBER 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM

49


WRITTEN BY KUR T N I MMO

Infowars reporter, SSG Joe Biggs dressed as an ISIS militant sneaking across the Rio Grande US-Mexico border in September.

Homeland Security: No ISIS Threat at Border Terror threat on porous border has existed for more than a decade

T

here is no credible intelligence to suggest that there is an active plot by ISIL to attempt to cross the southern border,” Homeland Security officials declared in a written statement, according to The New York Times. ISIL is an alternative name for ISIS. Democrats are attempting to spin the warnings issued last month by government insiders. In August Judicial Watch cited high-level sources in the federal government stating ISIS would cross the border “very soon” and launch attacks. At the same time Judicial Watch released its report, the Texas Department of Public Safety issued a situational awareness report stating ISIS

50

has expressed an interest in crossing the border. “A review of ISIS social media messaging during the week ending August 26 shows that militants are expressing an increased interest in the notion that they could clandestinely infiltrate the southwest border of US, for terror attack,” the bulletin warned. It also stated at the time there was no known or credible homeland security threats present on the border. Fears of potential terrorist activity along the porous border is not new. “We are seeing a pattern of terrorist suspects exploring opportunities to get hold of Mexican passports and documents and infiltrating into the U.S. through Mexico,” Magnus Ranstorp, director of the Center for the Study of

Terrorism and Political Violence at the University of St. Andrews in Scotland, told The Los Angeles Times in 2004. Democrats insist the border is not open to terrorists despite the fact thousands of illegal immigrants and drug smugglers cross the border on a weekly basis. “There’s a longstanding history in this country of projecting whatever fears we have onto the border,” Rep. Beto O’Rourke, a Democrat from Texas, told the Times. “In the absence of understanding the border, they insert their fears. Before it was Iran and Al Qaeda. Now it’s ISIS. They just reach the conclusion that invasion is imminent, and it never is.”

VOL. 3 ISSUE 2 OCTOBER 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM


S

peaking to a liberal think tank on September 16th, Deputy Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas suggested a dip in apprehensions of illegal immigrant youth last month meant the Obama administration has greatly strengthened border security, a fantasy considering that anyone, including ISIS, would have no problem walking into America. “What we have achieved is tremendous progress,” he claimed. Of course, when it comes to officials in the Obama administration, the truth is typically the opposite of what they say, and in Mayorkas’s case, the border is so insecure, it really only exists as a line on a map. And not only do illegals from over 170 of the world’s countries know this, but it’s also likely that ISIS knows this as well. “Intelligence officials have picked up radio talk and chatter indicating that the terrorist groups are going to ‘carry out an attack on the border,’ according to one source,” Judicial Watch reported in late August. “‘It’s coming very soon,’ according to another highlevel source, who clearly identified the groups planning the plots as ‘ISIS and Al Qaeda.’” In direct response to this report, the

DHS Official Claims Border “More Secure Than Ever” WRITTEN BY KIT DAN IE LS

In true Orwellian fashion, the Deputy Secretary of Homeland Security claimed the U.S. Border is “more secure than it has ever been before.” White House stated “there is no credible intelligence to suggest that there is an active plot” by ISIS on the southern border, but once again the truth is likely the opposite of the Obama administration’s claim. “I think it’d be naive to say that [ISIS is] not here,” Midland County Sheriff Gary Painter told Fox News. “We have found Muslim clothing, they [other agencies] have found Quran books that are lying on the side of the trail, so we know that there are Muslims that have come across and are being smuggled into the United States.” This illegal immigration into America has no doubt been encouraged by the Obama administration’s purposeful stand down of immigration enforcement, except when it comes to Americans who cross the border while

mountain biking. In early September, Homeland Security fined an American $5,000 for crossing the U.S./Canada border after a Border Patrol agent stopped the man and his companion, who were walking with their mountain bikes near the border, and began questioning them. “Questioning by the agent revealed that the two suspects illegally entered the U.S. from Canada,” stated a Customs and Border Patrol press release “Subsequently, both males were arrested for violation of U.S. law and transported to the Rangeley Station for further processing.” It’s unlikely the American would have been fined if he were an illegal alien.

James O’ Keefe crossing the Canadian border into the US dressed as a ISIS militant.


WRITTEN BY PAUL J O S E PH WATS O N

Virologist: ‘It’s Too Late, Ebola Will Kill 5 Million’

A

top German virologist has caused shockwaves by asserting that it’s too late to halt the spread of Ebola in Sierra Leone and Liberia and that five million people will die, noting that efforts should now be focused on stopping the transmission of the virus to other countries. Jonas Schmidt-Chanasit of the Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine in Hamburg told Germany’s Deutsche Welle that hope is all but lost for the inhabitants of Sierra Leone and Liberia and that the virus will only “burn itself out” when it has infected the entire population and killed five million people. “The right time to get this epidemic under control in these countries has been missed,” said Schmidt-Chanasit. “That time was May and June. “Now it is too late.” The current Ebola outbreak in West Africa has killed over 2200 people, with Liberia and Sierra Leone accounting for over 1700 of those fatalities. While calling for “massive help” from the international community to prevent Ebola appearing in other countries like Nigeria and Senegal, Schmidt-Chanasit warns that getting a grip on the epidemic in Liberia and Sierra Leone is a departure from reality. German aid organization Welthungerhilfe blasted Schmidt-Chanasit for his comments, with Sierra Leone based coordinator Jochen Moninger labeling his statements, “dangerous and more-

over, not correct.” However, Moninger acknowledged that Schmidt-Chanasit’s assessment may be accurate in the case of Liberia. The World Health Organization refused to comment on Schmidt-Chanasit’s remarks. Although Ebola continues to rage in five African countries, media coverage of the epidemic has waned, despite evidence that the virus has mutated. As we reported last month, former FDA official Scott Gottlieb, M.D. warned that if the virus was to hit the United States, the CDC would enact emergency procedures which could lead to healthy Americans who show no symptoms of the diseased being forcibly detained for an indefinite period of time. Scientists in Canada and Canada’s Public Health Agency have both acknowledged that the virus has likely gone airborne at least to a limited degree, while the CDC has urged airline staff to take steps to prevent the airborne spread of the virus, including giving suspected Ebola victims surgical masks as well as directing staff to “not use compressed air, which might spread infectious material through the air.” UPDATE: After this article was published, the “5 million” quote from the original Deutsche Welle report was removed and the headline was changed. It is not known why Deutsche Welle changed the wording of the report without issuing a formal retraction.

Expert Says Virus Will Infect Entire Population Of African Countries

52

VOL. 3 ISSUE 2 OCTOBER 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM



Flashback: Ebola Goes Airborne, Causes Outbreak in Medical Lab WRITTEN BY K I T DA N I E LS

A mutated Ebola virus likely spread through the ventilation system of a Virginia medical lab in 1989 and infected dozens of monkeys in separate research rooms, highlighting the current potential of an airborne Ebola strain killing millions of people.

I

n late 1989, cynomolgus monkeys from the Philippines delivered to Hazleton Research Products’ Primate Quarantine Unit in Reston, Va., began dying at an alarming rate, prompting HRP to euthanize all the monkeys in that shipment, but during the 10 days after the euthanization, other monkeys in separate rooms connected only by air ducts began dying as well, which was attributed to an Ebola strain that went airborne. “Due to the spread of infection to animals in all parts of the quarantine facility, it is likely that Ebola Reston may have been spread by airborne transmission,” wrote Lisa A. Beltz in the book Emerging Infectious Diseases. “On several subsequent occasions during 1989, 1990 and 1996, Ebola Reston killed monkeys in colonies in the United States.” “Some of the people at the colony in Texas and several of the workers at the facility in the Philippines also produced antibodies to the virus but did not

become ill.” The 1989 incident validates concerns that a new, airborne strain of Ebola could infect humans, and if such a mutated strain already exists, it would easily explain why Ebola is currently spreading so rapidly in Africa. For one thing, because Ebola doesn’t replicate itself perfectly every time it infects a victim, each new infection represents a potential mutation of the disease. “If certain mutations occurred, it would mean that just breathing would put one at risk of contracting Ebola,” wrote Michael T. Osterholm of the New York Times. “Infections could spread quickly to every part of the globe, as the H1N1 influenza virus did in 2009, after its birth in Mexico.” And due to the severity of the current outbreak in western Africa, which is the worst in history, Ebola has had more chances to mutate in the past four months than in the past 500 years. “What is not getting said publicly,


despite briefings and discussions in the inner circles of the world’s public health agencies, is that we are in totally uncharted waters and that Mother Nature is the only force in charge of the crisis at this time,” journalist Mac Slavo wrote. What is known publicly, however, is that the State Department has taken the threat of Ebola so seriously it recently ordered 160,000 Hazmat suits, well over 100 times the number of federal workers currently in western Africa. But just how large is the risk of Ebola mutating even further? Right now, it has the potential to infect – and kill – five million people in western Africa, according to a top German virologist. “The right time to get this epidemic under control in these countries has been missed,” Jonas Schmidt-Chanasit of Hamburg’s Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine told Deutsche Welle. “That time was May and June; now it is too late.”

VOL. 3 ISSUE 2 OCTOBER 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM

55


WRITTEN BY JON RAPPOPORT

The Big One: CDC whistleblower goes public “Here it is. All the people who said we were making it up, inventing charges of fraud at the CDC…well, here it is. CDC Whistleblower William Thompson’s own statement, released from his lawyer’s office.”

I

’ll have more to say about Thompson’s confession. But for now, read his words, particularly the opening. The 2004 CDC study on the MMR vaccine and autism was cooked. It was fraud. STATEMENT OF WILLIAM W. THOMPSON, Ph.D., REGARDING THE 2004 ARTICLE EXAMINING THE POSSIBILITY OF A RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MMR VACCINE AND AUTISM My name is William Thompson. I am a Senior Scientist with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, where I have worked since 1998. I regret that my coauthors and I omitted statistically significant information in our 2004 article published in the journal Pediatrics. The omitted data suggested that African American males who received the MMR vaccine before age 36 months were at increased risk for autism. Decisions were made regarding which findings to report after the data were collected, and I believe that the final study protocol was not followed. I want to be absolutely clear that I believe vaccines have saved and continue to save countless lives. I would never suggest that any parent avoid vaccinating children of any race. Vaccines prevent serious diseases, and the

56

risks associated with their administration are vastly outweighed by their individual and societal benefits. My concern has been the decision to omit relevant findings in a particular study for a particular sub­group for a particular vaccine. There have always been recognized risks for vaccination and I believe it is the responsibility of the CDC to properly convey the risks associated with receipt of those vaccines. I have had many discussions with Dr. Brian Hooker over the last 10 months regarding studies the CDC has carried out regarding vaccines and neurodevelopmental outcomes including autism spectrum disorders. I share his belief that CDC decision-making and analyses should be transparent. I was not, however, aware that he was recording any of our conversations, nor was I given any choice regarding whether my name would be made public or my voice would be put on the Internet. I am grateful for the many supportive e-mails that I have received over the last several days. I will not be answering further questions at this time. I am providing information to Congressman William Posey, and of course will continue to cooper-

ate with Congress. I have also offered to assist with reanalysis of the study data or development of further studies. For the time being, however, I am focused on my job and my family. Reasonable scientists can and do differ in their interpretation of information. I will do everything I can to assist any unbiased and objective scientists inside or outside the CDC to analyze data collected by the CDC or other public organizations for the purpose of understanding whether vaccines are associated with an increased risk of autism. There are still more questions than answers, and I appreciate that so many families are looking for answers from the scientific community. My colleagues and supervisors at the CDC have been entirely professional since this matter became public. In fact, I received a performance-based award after this story came out. I have experienced no pressure or retaliation and certainly was not escorted from the building, as some have stated. Dr. Thompson is represented by Frederick M. Morgan, Jr., Morgan Verkamp, LLC, Cincinnati, Ohio, www. morganverkamp.com.

VOL. 3 ISSUE 2 OCTOBER 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM


VOL. 3 ISSUE 2 OCTOBER 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM

57


CDC Whistle Blower’s ‘Vaccines and Autism’ Link may be Silenced Forever WRITTEN BY PAUL FASSA

T

he whistle blower felt guilt ridden for being part of withholding CDC documents that contained evidence of MMR vaccinations causing autism. Now, he’s been outed by the Autism Media Channel. That group’s site had disappeared at the time of this writing. According to investigative journalist Jon Rappoport of nomorefakenews.com, the whistle blower’s name is William W. Thompson, PhD. He was a scientist working for the CDC in its National Center for Immunizations and Respiratory Diseases (NCIRD), which includes the following in its mission statement: “… prevention of disease, disability, and death through immunization… .” “In other words, it’s a PR agency that promotes vaccines. Actual science about vaccine dangers would be cut off at the pass. [Now] Thompson is looked at as a threat to this agenda. His unwillingness to come all the way forward, speak his name, tell the whole truth has boomeranged on him,” asserts Rappoport, who also reported from a contact of his that Thompson was escorted out of CDC headquarters. He was fired, then the autism site that put out his name disappeared. Coinci-

58

A Few Questions That May Never Be Answered dence? I think not. Rapapport posed a valid conjecture: “The [bogus MMR] study was used by the press and the government to trumpet the idea (the lie) that everybody could rest easy; vaccines containing mercury

weren’t harming anyone. Now, this, too, comes under scrutiny.” He posed these questions: “If Thompson was lying about the MMR vaccine, did he also lie about mercury

and its toxic effects? Did he intentionally underplay those effects? Did he cook the data in that study, too?” Don’t be surprised if sooner rather than later Thompson is dead and the death is ruled a suicide. This has (potentially) happened to whistle blowers in the past. To name only a few: DC Madam Deborah Jeane Palfrey, who had threatened to disclose her little black book’s client content of DC big names; UK weapons expert Dr. David Kelley, who said the claim that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction was not true; and investigative journalist Gary Webb, who was ‘suicided’ in his home. In case you have doubts about Gary Webb’s widely accepted suicide because “he couldn’t get a big name press job anymore” lie, here’s more on the impossible logistics, shot twice with his .38 revolver in the back of his head “suicide”. There have been more. Other possibilities for silencing Thompson include committing him to a psychiatric ward and “treating” him with drugs that will make him crazy enough to be an unreliable source, or simply claiming he was a disgruntled employee who had lied. Unfortunately, most state institution and mainstreamers will accept all the above.

VOL. 3 ISSUE 2 OCTOBER 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM


VOL. 3 ISSUE 2 OCTOBER 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM

59


60

VOL. 3 ISSUE 2 OCTOBER 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM


WRITTEN BY K I T DA N I E LS

“GLOBAL WARMING” ADVOCATES PLAN MARCH AMID RECORD COLD TEMPERATURES Activists Marched Through New York City For “Global Warming Awareness” In Late September As The Northern U.s. Reeled From Record Cold Temperatures

C

alled the “largest climate march in history” by organizers, the “People’s Climate March” occured on Sept. 21st, a few days before the United Nations attempted to draft a “global warming” treaty on the same level as the controversial Kyoto Protocol. “The Secretary-General has asked leaders to announce significant and substantial initiatives to help move the world toward a path that will limit global warming,” states a U.N. press release. Yet, in contrast to that rhetoric, ice cold temperatures were shattering records across the U.S. and Antarctica’s sea ice is expanding at a record pace. “Chicago seemingly switched from summer to fall overnight,” NBC Chicago reported on Sept. 11. “Temperatures plunged from a high near 80 degrees on Wednesday to the mid-50s

on Thursday, and by mid-day the area set a record low for high temps.” “On this date in 1940, the coolest high temp was 61 degrees; on Thursday, O’Hare Airport recorded a high of 56 degrees.” Snow blanketed Denver, Colo., in mid-September and so far this summer, seven states have experienced snow on the ground. Additionally, the National Weather Service issued a freeze warning for all of western Montana and portions of central Idaho from Sept. 12-14. “The National Weather Service says a new record low temperature was set at Missoula, with Friday morning’s 25 degrees breaking the old record of 28 that was set back in September of 1988,” kaj18.com announced on Sept. 11. “The NWS also reports Kalispell also broke the cold weather record for this date, although it’s a mark that wasn’t as old.” “This morning’s low of 23 degrees

was below the old record of 24 that was set on Sept. 12, 2012.” The NWS also said that further south, in Nebraska, the temperature dips would likely break records. And in the Southern Hemisphere, Antarctica is on pace to set the alltime sea ice extent maximum. Satellite data shows that no global warming trend has occurred from Oct. 1996 to Aug. 2014, a period of nearly 18 years, and this period of cooling could last at least for another decade. “Taking the least-squares linear-regression trend on Remote Sensing Systems’ satellite-based monthly global mean lower-troposphere temperature dataset, there has been no global warming – none at all – for at least 215 months,” wrote climate analyst Lord Christopher Monckton. “This is the longest continuous period without any warming in the global instrumental temperature record since the satellites first watched in 1979.”

VOL. 3 ISSUE 2 OCTOBER 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM

61


62

VOL. 3 ISSUE 2 OCTOBER 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM


VOL. 3 ISSUE 2 OCTOBER 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM

63


WRITTEN BY PAUL JOSEPH WATSON

U.S. Army Plans to Battle Anti-Government Dissidents in “Megacities”

64

VOL. 3 ISSUE 2 OCTOBER 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM


Future Operations Will Neutralize Groups Which ‘Undermine The Authority Of The State’

T

he U.S. Army is preparing to fight political dissidents who challenge the power of the state as “megacities” become the battleground of the future, according to a new report in the Army Times. The article details how the Army’s Capabilities Integration Center (ARCIC) worked with US Army Special Operations Command, the chief of staff’s Strategic Studies Group and the UK’s Ministry of Defence earlier this year to wargame the future of armed combat, which will revolve around the neutralization of groups “who can influence the lives of the population while undermining the authority of the state,” a chillingly vague description which could easily be applied to political dissidents. The plan foresees an unprecedented realignment of U.S. military strategy focused around putting “boots on the ground” in megacities to deal with “politically dispossessed” populations while relying on “more lethal and more autonomous” methods. “It is inevitable that at some point the United States Army will be asked to operate in a megacity and currently the Army is ill-prepared to do so,” asserted a report by Army Chief of Staff Gen. Ray Odierno’s Strategic Studies Group, while Lt. Gen. H.R. McMaster warned that the Army will increasingly have to expand its presence to battle an enemy which operates in “other contested

spaces like organized crime and politics.” The report also notes how the Army will utilize directed energy weapons which “would allow U.S. to have direct-fire capabilities with significant logistics reduction, and to counter enemy longrange missile capability.” The article also cites a recent report by the Australian Army which identifies the fact that “these cities represent the battlefields of the future.” Confirmation that the U.S. Army is preparing to fight disaffected groups and individuals who attempt to ‘undermine the authority of the state’, which could apply to a whole host of perfectly legal political activities, is particularly concerning given the recent militarized police response to unrest in Ferguson, Missouri. A 2012 study by the National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism at the University of Maryland which was funded by the Department of Homeland Security lists Americans who are “reverent of individual liberty” and “suspicious of centralized federal authority” alongside violent terrorist groups. Will citizens who ‘undermine the authority of the state’ by espousing these beliefs also be a future target for the U.S. Army under this new doctrine? Earlier this year we also highlighted how the U.S. Army built a 300 acre ‘fake city’ in Virginia complete with a sports stadium, bank, school, and

an underground subway in order to train for unspecified future combat scenarios. The city included a Christian chapel and subway signs in English, suggesting it was intended to double as a domestic town in addition to an overseas location. The Army Times report is also disconcerting in light of a recently uncovered U.S. Army training document which detailed preparations for “full scale riots” within the United States during which troops may be forced to engage in a “lethal response” to deal with crowds of demonstrators. As with previous examples, the manual made it clear that such operations were being planned not just for foreign occupations but for inside the “continental United States (CONUS)” in the event of “unruly and violent crowds” where it is “necessary to quell riots and restore public order.” The document also describes the deployment of a “lethal response” directed against “unarmed civilians,” including “sniper response” and “small arms direct fire,” while making reference to domestic political upheavals such as the 1999 demonstrations against the WTO in Seattle. While the U.S. border remains wide open amidst reports of ISIS insurgents planning attacks, the fact that the security apparatus of the United States is more concerned with taking on political dissidents inside megacities is likely to prompt fresh outrage.

VOL. 3 ISSUE 2 OCTOBER 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM

65


66

VOL. 3 ISSUE 2 OCTOBER 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM


VOL. 3 ISSUE 2 OCTOBER 2014 INFOWARS MAGAZINE—INFOWARS.COM

67



Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.