Beyond Misinformation - What Science Says About the Destruction of World Trade Center Buildings

Page 37

A scanning electron microscopy image with EDS of an “iron-rich sphere” provided by USGS.

Steven Jones et al. Published by Dr. Steven Jones and seven other scientists in early 2008, the paper Extremely High Temperatures during the World Trade Center Destruction connected the dots between the earlier RJ Lee and Table 6: Approximate Minimum Temperatures Required PROCESS AND MATERIAL

°C

°F

To form Fe-O-S eutectic (with ~50 Mol % sulfur) in steel

1,000

1,832

To melt aluminosilicates (spherule formation)

1,450

2,652

To melt iron (spherule formation)

1,538

2,800

To melt iron (III) oxide (spherule formation)

1,565

2,849

To vaporize lead

1,740

3,164

To melt molybdenum (spherule formation)

2,623

4,753

To vaporize aluminosilicates

2,760

5,000

Reproduced from the paper Extremely High Temperatures during the WTC Destruction.

USGS reports. It also provided new observations based on analysis of WTC dust samples obtained by Dr. Jones. According to the authors: The formation of spherules in the dust implies the generation of materials somehow sprayed into the air so that surface tension draws the molten droplets into near-spherical shapes. The shape is retained as the droplet solidifies in the air.

BEYOND MISINFORMATION

In addition to observing spherules of iron and silicates, their study discussed the presence of molybdenum spherules documented by the USGS study but not included in its report. (This additional data from the USGS study was obtained through a FOIA request.) Molybdenum is known for its extremely high melting point of 2,623°C (4,754°F).

35

A scanning electron microscopy image with EDS of vesicular alumino-silicate provided by RJ Lee.

Jones’ study also discussed evidence of even higher

temperatures contained in the RJ Lee report (quoting from the RJ Lee report): Some particles show evidence of being exposed to a conflagration such as spherical metals and silicates, and vesicular particles (round open porous structure having a Swiss cheese appearance as a result of boiling and evaporation)…. These transformed materials include: spherical iron particles, spherical and vesicular silicates, and vesicular carbonaceous particles. Dr. Jones and his coauthors observed: [I]f the “Swiss-cheese appearance” is indeed the result of “boiling and evaporation” of the material as the [RJ Lee] report suggests, we note the boiling temperature for aluminosilicate is approximately 2,760°C. They then provided a table (see Table 6 at left) summarizing the temperatures needed to account for the various evidence of high temperatures in the World Trade Center destruction, which they contrasted with the much lower maximum temperatures associated with the fires on September 11. The closest NIST has come to acknowledging the evidence of extremely high temperatures in the WTC dust was in an email communication with an independent researcher following the release of NIST’s draft report on WTC 7. NIST replied to the researcher’s inquiry with a single sentence: “The NIST investigative team has not seen a coherent and credible hypothesis for how iron-rich spheres could be related to the collapse of WTC 7.”8

Nano-thermite in the WTC Dust In April 2009 a group of scientists led by Dr. Niels Harrit, an expert in nano-chemistry who taught chemistry at the University of Copenhagen for over 40 years, published a paper in the Open Chemical Physics Journal titled Active Thermitic Materials Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe. This paper, which reported the results of experiments conducted on small red-gray, bi-layered chips found in multiple independent WTC dust samples, concluded that the chips were unreacted nano-thermite, a form of thermite with explosive properties engineered at the nano-level.


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

Endnotes

6min
page 49

References

4min
pages 50-52

Appendix B: Accounts Indicating Foreknowledge of WTC 7’s Destruction

6min
page 48

Appendix A: Eyewitness Accounts of Explosions

13min
pages 46-47

NIST’s Computer Modeling

6min
pages 44-45

How Hot Did the Steel Become?

3min
page 43

Estimates of Fireproofing Dislodgement

3min
page 42

Hypothetical Blast Scenarios and Thermite Use

3min
page 41

6. NIST’s Evidence for Fire-Induced Failure

1min
page 40

NIST’s Refusal to Test for Explosives or Thermite Residues

5min
pages 38-39

Nano-thermite in the WTC Dust

2min
page 37

Iron Spherules and Other Particles in the WTC Dust

3min
page 36

Molten Metal in the Debris

3min
page 34

Sulfidated Steel in WTC 7

3min
page 35

Eyewitness Accounts of Explosions

6min
pages 24-25

Molten Metal Pouring out of WTC 2

2min
page 33

Foreknowledge of WTC 7’s Destruction

6min
pages 30-31

5. High-Temperature Thermitic Reactions

1min
page 32

Demolition Squibs

3min
page 23

Pulverization, Dismemberment, and Explosive Ejection of Materials

2min
page 22

Constant Acceleration through the Path of Greatest Resistance

6min
pages 20-21

Sudden Onset

2min
page 19

The Features of Controlled Demolition vs. Fire-Induced Failure

4min
pages 9-10

3. The Destruction of WTC 1 and WTC 2

1min
page 18

NIST’s Probable Collapse Sequences for WTC 1, WTC 2, and WTC 7

8min
pages 16-17

The NIST Investigation

3min
page 15

What Is the Most Likely Hypothesis?

1min
page 11

Introduction

2min
pages 4-5
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.