euro 46,00 isbn 978-88-548-7436-7
C ip rian i E C O L O G I C A L A I R P O RT U R B A N I S M . A I R P O RT S A N D L A N D S C A P E S I N T H E I TA L I A N N O RT H E A S T A r ac n e
Laura Ci pri ani , M a r ie C u r ie r e s e a r c h e r a t Tr e n t o U ni v e r si t y a nd v i si t i ng pr o f e sso r i n Lands ca pe Urba n is m a t Ve n ic e U n ive r s it y IU AV a nd t he P o l i t e cni co di M i l a no , w o r k s i n urban and l a n d s c a p e r e s e a r c h a n d d e s ig n . Ove r t he y e a r s, she ha s spe c i a l i se d i n the rel a ti ons hi p b e t w e e n in f r a s t r u c t u r e a n d la n d s c a pe , w i t h a co nst a nt co m m i t m e nt t o res earch and un ive r s it y t e a c h in g . She regul arl y a t t e n d s c o n f e r e n c e s o n t h e t o p i c i n a ca de m i c a nd pr o f e ssi o na l env i ronments a n d h a s p u b lis h e d h e r r e s e a r c h in se v e r a l bo o k s. “ Eco l o g i ca l A i r po r t Urbani s m” (Uni ve r s it à d i Tr e n t o , 2012) a n d “A ir p o r t U r ba ni sm ” ( A r a cne , 2 0 1 2 ) a r e he r l as t publ i ca ti ons. Laura recei v ed a Ph . D . in U r b a n is m f r o m Ve n ic e U ni v e r si t y ( I U AV) , a M a st e r ’s de g r e e (M.Des .) wi th di st in c t io n f o c u s e d o n u r b a n a n d la n d s ca pe i ssue s f r o m H a r v a r d U ni v e r si t y (Gradua te Schoo l o f D e s ig n ) a n d B a c h e lo r a n d M a st e r ’s de g r e e s i n A r chi t e ct ur e w i t h honours from Ve n ic e U n ive r s it y (IU AV ).
AIR 01
Airp o rt s p la y an i n c r eas i n g l y i m p or t an t r o l e i n c i t i e s a n d i n r e g i o n a l d e ve lo p me n t . Av i a t i on i t s el f g en er a t es s oc i al a n d e c o n o m i c b e n e f i t s f o r t h e a re a it se r ve s , b u t al s o b r i n g s w i t h i t c on s i d e r a b l e e n v i r o n m e n t a l a n d s o c i a l co st s. Wh a t d o we m ean b y ‘ec ol og i c al ai r p or t u r b ani s m ’ ? I s i t p o s s i b l e t o i n t e g r a t e la n d sca p e a n d ai r p or t i n f r as t r u c t u r e i n an e c o l o g i c a l l y - ‘ s u s t a i n a b l e ’ w a y ? Wh a t a re t h e i n f l u en c es on t h e u r b an c on t ex t? St a rt in g f ro m c as e- s t u d i es , t h i s s t u d y s eek s t o a d d r e s s m u l t i p l e i s s u e s re la t e d t o t h e u r b an an d en v i r on m en t al i m p a c t s o f a i r p o r t s a n d t o i d e n t i f y p o ssib le in t e r v en t i on s t o ac h i ev e an ‘ec o- ai r po r t s y s t e m ’ – a n i n f r a s t r u c t u r e m o d e l wit h red u c ed l an d s c a p e an d en v i r on m e n t a l i m p a c t t o b e a p p l i e d i n o t h e r re g io n a l c on t ex t s . I n p ar t i c u l ar, t h i s r es e a r c h w i l l f o c u s o n t h e N o r t h E a st o f It a l y as an ex p er i m en t al f i el d i n v es t i g a t i o n i n o r d e r t o d e v e l o p a wo rkin g m e t h o d ol og y an d s t r a t eg i c - p l an n i n g p r o p o s a l t o g u i d e t h e p l a n n i n g a n d d e sig n o f an ec ol og i c al ai r p or t s y s t em a t r e g i o n a l a n d u r b a n s c a l e .
ECOLOGICAL AIRPORT URBANISM
A I R P O RT S A N D L A N D S C A P E S I N T H E I TA L I A N N O RT H E A S T
Lau r a C i p r i an i
A r ac n e
01
AIRPORT URBANISM
airports, landscapes and cities
01
Direttore Laura Cipriani Università degli Studi di Trento
Comitato scientifico Bernardo Secchi† Università Iuav di Venezia
Giovanni Corbellini Università degli Studi di Trieste
Marino Lupi Università degli Studi di Pisa
Charles Waldheim Harvard Design School, USA
AIRPORT URBANISM
“The airplane, flying over forests, rivers, mountains, and seas and revealing supremely powerful laws, the simple principles which regulate natural phenomena, will arrive at the city of the new era of machine civilization.” “ L’aeroplano sorvolando le foreste, i fiumi, le montagne e i mari e avendoci rivelato le grandi leggi forti, i principi semplici che regolano gli eventi naturali, arriverà sulle città della nuova era della civiltà macchinista ”. Le Corbusier
The book series welcomes research works and research by design projects dealing with the airport landscape theme. The interdisciplinary approach aims to stimulate debate and knowledge of a topic which is still marginal in international scientific debate and the teaching field.
La collana accoglie ricerca e sperimentazioni progettuali relativamente alla tematica aeroporti e paesaggio. L’approccio interdisciplinare adottato intende stimolare il dibattito e la conoscenza su un tema ancora marginale nella formazione didattica e nel dibattito scientifico internazionale.
This volume presents a number of reflections on the airport landscape theme, fruit of a series of meetings between the researcher and the Veneto Region Department of Regional and Strategic Planning on Venice airport-city and the data collected and considerations matured by the researcher during the Marie Curie COFUND-PAT programme at Trento University.
Trento University
European Community
Marie Curie Actions Cofund
Autonomous Province of Trento
The researcher is supported by the European Community and the Autonomous Province of Trento and co-funded by Marie Curie Actions. The work leading to this publication received funding under the 7th European Community Framework Programme 7 PQ/2007-2013 and from the Autonomous Province of Trento under Grant Agreement no. 226070 (notice “researcher post-doc 2010 Incoming CALL 1” - Project “Trentino PCOFUND-GA-2008-226070”).
ECOLOGICAL AIRPORT URBANISM
A I R P O RT S A N D L A N D S C A P E S I N T H E I TA L I A N N O RT H E A S T
Laura Cipriani
Copyright © MMXIV ARACNE editrice S.r.l. www.aracneeditrice.it info@aracneeditrice.it via Raffaele Garofalo, 133/A–B 00173 Roma (06) 93781065
is b n
978–88–548–7436–7
I diritti di traduzione, di memorizzazione elettronica, di riproduzione e di adattamento anche parziale, con qualsiasi mezzo, sono riservati per tutti i Paesi. Non sono assolutamente consentite le fotocopie senza il permesso scritto dell’Editore. I edizione: agosto 2014
AU T H O R
Laura Cipriani
I M AG E S
Laura Cipriani
TE X T
Laura Cipriani
TR A N SL ATO R
Ter Centro Traduzioni
P H OT O S
Laura Cipriani, Denver Airport, Brian Robbins, Rui Sousa
G R AP H I C D ES I G N Laura Cipriani
L AY OU T
Laura Cipriani with Giorgia Anastasio (A4 Design)
CONTENTS
ECOLOGICAL AIRPORT URBANISM AIRPORTS AND LANDSCAPES IN THE ITALIAN NORTH EAST
10
12
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
INTRODUCTION
16
AIRPORTS, CITIES AND THE LANDSCAPE
28
THE AIRPORT LANDSCAPE OF ITALY
40
ONE, NONE AND ONE-HUNDRED THOUSAND “NORTHEAST CITIES”
58
VENICE AIRPORT
61
The Role of the Airport: Studies and Future Scenarios
70
Landscape Transformations
82
Obstacles Plan
84
Noise Contours
86
Flood Risk and Flood Risk Scenarios
Special Conservation Areas and Special Protection Areas
90
Birds and Impact
92
Emissions
97
SCENARIOS
102
2030 Scenarios
107
Constants
108
Variables
109
2100 Scenarios
121
ATLAS
128
BELLUNO | Belluno Airfield
130
BERGAMO | Bergamo Orio al Serio International Airport
134
BERGAMO | Bergamo Valbrembo Airfield
136
BOLZANO | Bolzano Dolomiti Airport
138
140
BRESCIA | Brescia Montichiari Airport
142
GORIZIA | Gorizia Airfield
146
INNSBRUCK | Innsbruck Kranebitten Airport
148
MILAN | Milan Bresso Airfield
150
MILAN | Milan Linate International Airport
152
MILAN | Milan Malpensa International Airport
154
PADUA | Padua Airport
158
TRENTO | Trento Mattarello Airport
162
TREVISO | Treviso Airport
168
TREVISO | Treviso Istrana Airport
172
TRIESTE | Trieste Ronchi dei Legionari Airport
176
UDINE | Udine Campoformido
180
UDINE | Udine Rivolto Airport
184
VENICE | Venice San Nicolò Airfield
186
VENICE | Venice Tessera International Airport
190
VERONA | Verona Boscomantico Airfield
194
VERONA | Verona Villafranca International Airport
VICENZA | Vicenza Asiago Airfield
198
VICENZA | Vicenza Airport
202
VICENZA | Vicenza Thiene Airfield
208
DESIGN STRATEGIES AND DEVICES
212
Noise
219
Air
221
Energy
222
Permeability
223
Water
225
Denver International Airport, Denver, Usa
226
Montreal International Airport, Montreal, Canada
230
Zurich Airport, Zurich, Switzerland
234
Amsterdam Schipol Airport, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
236
REFERENCES
240
INTRODUCTION
E C O L O G I C A L A I R P O RT U R B A N I S M
I N T RODU CTI ON
By their nature, use, form and size, airports are often considered as spaces extraneous to the landscape and difficult to integrate into the local context. Yet airport infrastructure is playing an ever more important role in local development, modifying not just the aspect, but also the social structure, economy and environmental quality of the surrounding area. Infrastructure on this scale benefits society as a whole, but the environmental effects are a particularly heavy burden on the communities directly involved. How is the landscape modified by air transportation? What is meant by “ecological airport urbanism”? Can the landscape and airport infrastructure be integrated following ecological criteria? How can an airport be integrated into the local context? What design devices can be used? How can we combine today’s technological requirements with the need for unforeseen new functions in the future? In the future, how might disused airport infrastructure possibly be “recycled”? This study aims to make an initial contribution to research on the airport system in North East Italy in relation to current landscape transformation dynamics. The first part provides a theoretical background to the theme of airports, cities and the landscape. The intention is to provide an overview of contemporary scientific literature in order to open a dialogue on the hitherto little explored theme of airports in relation to the landscape. The second part examines the particular characteristics of Italy’s national airport system, then goes on to consider airports in North East Italy through original data and documents. Particular attention is given to the study of Venice airport, identifying the environmental risks and scenarios deriving from the urgent effects of climate change. Historical documents and accurate themed maps highlight the conflicts
14
INTRODUCTION
emerging around the airport and the possible short, medium and long term scenarios for the future. The study aims to develop a method to orient planning and design of an “ecological� airport system, identifying possible alternative development scenarios on multiple scales. The final section of the study therefore presents a series of designed projects proposing targeted design devices able to guide definition of the strategies and decisions to be taken today for the future. In an era dominated by uncertainty about tomorrow and by a race towards real or presumed sustainability, infrastructure must be re-planned, not just to accommodate today’s technological functions or contingent needs, but also with a view to possible future re-cycle, generating a method for re-inventing the landscape and thus becoming fertile ground for the unexpected.
E C O L O G I C A L A I R P O RT U R B A N I S M
15
AIRPORTS, CITIES AND THE LANDSCAPE
0
100
250 Km
> 10 million passengers 5-10 million passengers 1-5 million passengers 200 000-1 million passengers T H E A I R P O RT L A N D S C A P E O F I TA LY
1 000-200 000 passengers
Neither is there an adequate investment policy either by the State, owner of the land and until just a few years ago directly responsible for managing airside infrastructure, or by the airport operators. The provision of public funding is inadequate and insufficient compared to that of other European countries 1 , moreover the model of distribution among the airports is indiscriminate, nontransparent, discretional and beyond any form of planning framework. This is one of the reasons for the proliferation of airports, way above the European average. The majority of the 101 civilian airports in Italy have just a few hundred passengers per year, precisely because of the ongoing state funding received largely as a result of political pressures. In short, there is no serious, clear, transparent process of reform and liberalisation in the sector. The first laws passed (laws no. 537/93 and 351/95) modified the airport ownership and concession system, conditions of entry into the handling services market and tariff schedule for airport access, but they did not include effective measures to control airport management efficiency. The European Union directive was introduced in order to open up the landside services sector to the market with the aim of improving efficiency and reducing costs, but when this directive was taken on board by Italian legislation and partially applied, the results were unexpected. There is no efficient tariff schedule for airport services. Airport fees for passengers and carriers continue to be defined on a discretional basis, distorting competition between airlines using the same airport and between the airports themselves. An efficient regulatory system is fundamental to prevent abuse of a dominant position by airport operators or service providers in a position of monopoly or oligopoly and to prevent the risk that citizens pay airport costs twice, once through the tax system which allocates vast sums for the construction of infrastructure, then again through airport fees. Although the latest Interministerial Committee for Economic Planning (Comitato Interministeriale per la Programmazione Economica) resolution no. 86/2000 (Ministero delle Infrastrutture e Trasporti, 2000) aimed to create more efficient control systems, in fact, for many years the opposition of many airport operators 2 , strict constraints and poor profitability prevented implementation of this resolution until approval of new regulatory criteria as part of the 2005 Financial
Left: the main airports in Italy. Source data: Assaeroporti, 2010; ENAC, 2010. Map by Laura Cipriani.
E C O L O G I C A L A I R P O RT U R B A N I S M
35
Bolzano
Treviso
SANT’ANGELO
Trieste
RONCHI DEI LEGIONARI
=
Treviso
SANT’ANGELO
Venice
Venice
TESSERA
Verona
VILLAFRANCA
TESSERA
Verona
VILLAFRANCA
The North East and associated airport-regional systems. The system corresponding to the Alpine Area along the A22 motorway is shown in grey. The system corresponding to the Plains Area along the A4 motorway is shown in green. Map by Laura Cipriani.
The mobility projects currently underway for the Northeast only make sense at a macro scale. But what is the Northeast city in reality? What are its borders? How many Northeasts can be drawn or imagined? The mobile Northeast is itself a kaleidoscope. It changes according to the point of view that we adopt and to the kind of mobility in consideration. There is a Northeast motorway that corresponds to the A4 and A22 (the motorscape). There is a fragmentary, fermenting metropolitan Northeast that surrounds built and planned railways (metroscape); a Northeast aviopolis comprised of a multicity of disorganized airport structures of varying importance (airscape); and finally, to this infrastructure of interwoven asphalt, steel, and air we add the landscape of water mobility of several basins – the Adige, Brenta-Bacchiglione, Piave, Sile, Bacino Scolante, Livenza, Lemene, Tagliamento, the laguna of Marano and Grado, Isonzo, Slizza and Levante – which for many centuries were the main systems of mobility (waterscape). Despite the fact that the Northeast city is traversed by the important European
44
O N E , N O N E A N D O N E - H U N D R E D T H O U S A N D “ N O RT H E A S T C I T I E S ”
Trieste
+
RONCHI DEI LEGIONARI
Bolzano
Innsbruck Innsbruck
+
=
Milan
MALPENSA
Bergamo
Bolzano
Treviso
SANT’ANGELO
Milan
MALPENSA
Bergamo
ORIO AL SERIO
Trieste
RONCHI DEI LEGIONARI
Venice
ORIO AL SERIO
Verona
TESSERA
VILLAFRANCA
corridors V and I, making the area one of the nodes of the big EU mobility scenarios, a unifying vision is lacking. Northeast city is organized on a fragmentary network of infrastructure that is mostly based on roadways, and only secondarily on railways. To what area does the north east airport system correspond? What image do people have of the geographical location and boundaries of the North East? For the purposes of this study, the North East airport system is defined in relation to the landscape and includes an area more or less corresponding to the regions of Veneto, Trentino-Alto Adige and Friuli-Venezia Giulia, together with a number of neighbouring Italian and European provinces, creating a “multiple airport system” (De Neufville & Odoni, 2003) in which the airports served by the air transportation service depend on their geographical location rather than on exclusively political-administrative control. When working with the territory, it is not possible to take an established boundary as a reference. In this study, I therefore tried to schematically reduce the two
E C O L O G I C A L A I R P O RT U R B A N I S M
45
Innsbruck
T H E ALPINE AIRPORT SYSTEM
Bolzano
PROVINCES
TRENTO
BOLZANO
TIROLO
VERONA
AREA (km 2 )
6 206
7 399
12 640
3 120
529 457
507 657
710 048*
920 158
Bolzano
Innsbruck
Villafranca
3 | 25
n.a. | n.a.
2|5
POPULATION (inhabitants) Source data: ISTAT, 2010; * Landesstatistik Tirol Einwohnererhebung It. ZMR, 2010
MAIN AIRPORTS
SECONDARY AIRPORTS
AIRFIELDS l HELIPORTS Source data: ENAC, 2011
48
O N E , N O N E A N D O N E - H U N D R E D T H O U S A N D “ N O RT H E A S T C I T I E S ”
Mattarello
0 | 11
North East airport systems: on one hand the Plains Airport System consisting of a series of main airports linked by the A4 motorway and rail lines, on the other the Alpine Airport System linked by the A22 motorway and extending beyond the Italian frontier. Although schematic, this subdivision is based on the awareness that on the one hand, the respective catchment areas of the main airports are in close relationship with the road and rail infrastructure systems and that, on the other, the physical configuration of the land on which the airports stand and on which air operations depend (one on the plains, one in the mountains) are radically different and as such require specific treatment. After describing the specific characteristics of the Italian airport system, a sort of reference atlas of the main airports in the area was drawn up, defining the problems and potentials of the airports concerned and concluding with the proposal of possible short and long term land transformation scenarios on local and interregional scale. More than other areas in Italy, the economic organisation of the North East is characterised by a demand for long distance, highly flexible mobility, fragmented in both origin and destination. In recent decades internationalisation of the economic system and delocalisation of production activities have intensified, without corresponding development of an adequate long distance transport system. In this area, there are in fact numerous airports at different levels, from the main airport centres of Venice-Tessera and Verona through the airports of Treviso, Bolzano, Trento and Ronchi dei Legionari to a myriad of airfields covering almost the entire area. They are still not, however, organised according to a coherent plan on first national, then interregional level. For many years, the lack of specific airport infrastructure plans made a long term vision impossible, creating a state of permanent uncertainty not just concerning airports, airport operators, airlines, local authorities and financers, but above all in the local area from a landscape, environmental and urban point of view. The lack of vast scale planning has fuelled risky competition among airports, often translating into fierce antagonism between cities and regions. Geographical and socio-economic characteristics, inadequate regulatory provisions and a fragmented offer are just some of the elements peculiar to the Italian aviation sector. State action is contradictory. On one hand it is absent
E C O L O G I C A L A I R P O RT U R B A N I S M
49
and unable to provide continuity and regulatory uniformity, on the other, it is the preponderant protagonist in pervasive but often unsuitable public action. Constitution of an airports network, efficient both in terms of the use of scarce resources (land, airspace, etc.) and in the provision of services (to ensure that the development of one airport does not damage that of another), calls for the creation of complementary, rather than competitive, functional links. Today, there is no doubt that airports have an increasingly important role in cities and in regional development. Aviation itself generates social and economic benefits to the territory it serves, but also brings with it considerable environmental and social costs. According to Eurocontrol, 66% of European airports today have territorial and environmental constraints to their development. This figure is expected to rise 0 to 80% in the next five years since by 2016 air movements in Europe are assumed to grow to more than 11 million and in 2025 should reach around 1519 million (Eurocontrol, 2010). This study shows that in the north east of Italy all airports are located into the city and in areas of widespread urban development. In addition to that, many 50 airports currently defined as first level stand on very delicate environmental systems (watercourses, wetlands, etc.). Considering Veneto, Friuli, and Trentino Alto Adige Regions, in the north east 3 main airports (Venice, Treviso, and Trieste) and 5 secondary airports (Belluno, Vicenza, Verona Boscomantico, Udine Campoformido, Gorizia) are located next to Special Conservation Areas (SACs) and Special Protection Areas (SPAs). Although it is evident that Venice-Tessera is today preparing to become the first intermodal node in the North East mobility network along the Trans-Europe Corridor V, it is necessary to look beyond contingent issues to propose long term scenarios for the future. The inevitable growth of air transportation, probable airport congestion and 150 Km emerging conflict with local communities therefore necessitate an in-depth study to promote a series of alternative scenarios and precise measures for short term and above all long term environmental mitigation. > 10 mil. passengers 5-10 mil. passengers 1-5 mil. passengers 200.000-1 mil. passengers 1.000-200.000 passengers secondary airports military airports
Left: main airports catchment areas. Source data: ENAC, 2010. Map by Laura Cipriani.
AIRPORT AREA
RUNWAY LENGHT
TERMINAL
hectars (Ha)
meters (m)
square meters (m 2 )
PASSENGER NUMBER millions (mil)
Passeggeri Passeggeri Passeggeri Passeggeri Sedime superficie Sedime superficie Sedime Sedime superficie superficie Lunghezza Lunghezza pista Lunghezza pista Lunghezza Terminal pistapista Terminal Terminal Terminal mq
147 Ha
459Ha m 147 Ha 2147
2 459 m
500 mm2 2 459 m11 2 459
1
VERONA Verona
Verona
Verona Verona371 Ha
371 Ha
067Ha m 371 Ha 3371
3 067 m
3 067 m213 750 067 m2
335 Ha
780Ha m 335 Ha 2335 3 300 m
2 780 m
2 780 m532 000 780 m m2
3 300 m
3 300 m 3 300 m
362
52 47 3 0 584mil1 6 5 2 7 6 3 80 mil 7 4 1 8 mil
6 03
714 0 8 251 9 36 2
41
52
603
714 0 825mil 1
362
52 47 3 0 584mil1 6 5 2 7 6 3 80 mil 7 4 1 8 mil
6 03
714 0 8 251 9 36 2
30
41
52
603
714 0 825mil 1
362
52 47 3 0 584mil1 6 5 2 7 6 3 80 mil 7 4 1 8 mil
6 03
714 0 8 251 9 36 2
52
603
714 0 825mil 1
362
47 3 0 584mil1 6 5 2 7 6 3 80 mil 7 4 1 8 mil 52
6 03
714 0 8 251 9 36 2
52
603
1 714 0 825mil
362
7 4 1 8 mil 47 3 0 584mil1 6 5 2 7 6 3 80 mil 52
6 03
714 0 8 251 9 36 2
2 750 m2 21 750 m21
1
2
30
41
2 000 m2 53 000 m53
53 000 m2
0
30
2
21 750 m2
1
totale passeggeri
335 Ha Venezia Venezia Venezia
714 0 825mil 1
2 500 m2 11 500 m11
1
0
VENICE Venezia
2
11 500 m2
0
603
2
30
41
total number of passengers international passengers national passengers city
merci avio merci superficie
Treviso Treviso 147 Ha
52
merci superficie totale merci
Treviso
41
totale merci
TREVISO Treviso
30
2 565 m2 23 565 m23
23 565 m2
0
Cargo in 10.000 tons
merci superficie
3 000 m233 565 000 m2
Cargo in 10.000 tons
merci avio
3 000 m
2
merci superficie
247 Ha 3247 000Ha m
1
merci avio
247 Ha
milioni milioni
totale merci
Trieste Trieste247 Ha
milioni
passeggeri nazionali
Trieste
milioni
800 m2 800 m2
800 m2
0
TRIESTE Trieste
mq
passeggeri nazionali passeggeri internazionali
1 297 m 1 297 800mm2
mq
passeggeri internazionali totale passeggeri
1 297 m
mq metri
totale passeggeri
metri
passeggeri internazionali
78 Ha1 297 78 Ha m
metri
passeggeri nazionali
78 Ha
Ha metri
totale passeggeri
Bolzano Bolzano Bolzano78 Ha
Ha
passeggeri internazionali
BOLZANOBolzano
Ha
passeggeri nazionali
Ha
totale merci
M A I N AIRPORTS
CARGO
AIRPORT & CITY
x 10.000 tons (t)
Sedime Cargo superficie
TAKEOFF-LANDING AREA
DISTANCE OF THE AIRPORT FROM THE CITY kilometers (Km)
Cono atterraggio-decollo
Distanza aeroporto-città
Aeroporto-città costruita
in 10.000 tons
Bolzano
8 mil
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10 t
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50 Km
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10 t
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50 Km
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10 t
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50 Km
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10 t
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50 Km
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10 t
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50 Km
Trieste
8 mil
0
Treviso
8 mil
0
Verona 8 mil
0
merci superficie
0
totale merci
8 mil
merci avio
Venezia
Source data: Assaeroporti, 2011; ENAC, 2010. Diagrams by Laura Cipriani.
“
in the north east of Italy all airports are located into the city and in areas of widespread urban development. In addition to that, many airports currently defined as first level stand on very delicate environmental systems.
Considering the Veneto, Friuli, and Trentino Alto
“
Adige regions, 3 main airports and 5 secondary airports are located near Special Conservation Areas (SACs) and Special Protection Areas (SPAs).
0
100
250 Km
airports > 1 million passengers secondary and military airports SACs and SPAs
Special Conservation Areas (SACs), Special Protection Areas (SPAs) and Italian airports. Source data: ENAC, 2010; Italian Ministery for Environment, 2010. Map by Laura Cipriani.
1954
Collage of historic photographs from 1954. Source data: GAI flight, 1954-55. Photo collage by Laura Cipriani.
0
0. 3
1 Km
L A N DSCAPE TRANSFORMATIONS
BEFORE...
WATER
+ the salt marshes in the natural state – lagoon land and salt marshes are at a height of between -50 and +30 m with respect to sea level
+ filling in of the Orsellin canal in correspondence to the canal between the flight paths and the mainland
The landscape before the construction of the airport (1954), the construction works (1954-55) and the airport today (2008). Source data: GAI Flight, 1954-55; CTR, 2008. Maps by Laura Cipriani.
-
+
=
SALT MARSHES
RUNWAY
AFTER
+ removal of the surface layer in the salt marsh area
+ construction of the raised area for the runway 3 m above sea level
+ the airport site today
E C O L O G I C A L A I R P O RT U R B A N I S M
73
for example, if in 2100 the aviation world underwent radical transformation and airports were no longer necessary or, rather, were no longer capable of accommodating the new technological requirements? What happens when the life cycle of the airport machine comes to an end? What types of function could a disused airport accommodate? How could the runways be re-utilised? Is it currently possible to design airport infrastructure with characteristics of extreme flexibility? What changes would take place if an aeroplane became a means of transport like a car in terms of size and frequency of use? What changes would occur if the minor transport network of small airports became the principal network?
Scenario with a 5 m rise in sea level. As can be seen, Venice airports (Tessera and San Nicolò on the Lido) are potentially at risk of sea level rise. 3D model and photograph by Laura Cipriani. E C O L O G I C A L A I R P O RT U R B A N I S M 1 2 5
ATLAS
B E L LUNO | Belluno Airfield “ A RTURO DELL’ORO”
ALTITUDE
GEOGRAPHIC COORDINATES
378 m.a.s.l.
45°10’02’’ N 12°14’52’’ E
ICAO CODE
LIDB
IATA CODE
BLX
PASSENGERS
n.a.
RUNWAY
AIRPORT AREA
1 3 0 AT L A S
812 x 42 m I grass
28 Ha
Source data: ENAV, 2014. Right: Belluno airport. Source data: CTR, 2008. Map by Laura Cipriani.
0
0. 5
1. 5 km
L A N DMARKS
Piave River
Belluno airfield
Belluno
Landmarks in the environs of Belluno airport. Aerial view by Laura Cipriani.
E C O L O G I C A L A I R P O RT U R B A N I S M 1 3 3
B O L ZANO | Bolzano Dolomiti Airport “ S A N GIACOMO”
ALTITUDE
GEOGRAPHIC COORDINATES
240 m.a.s.l.
46°27’37’’ N 11°19’35’’ E
ICAO CODE
LIPB
IATA CODE
BZO
MOVEMENTS
11 227/year
PASSENGERS
33 377/year
CARGO
RUNWAYS
AIRPORT AREA
1 3 8 AT L A S
0 tons
1 249 x 30 m I asphalt 698 x 20 I grass
78 Ha
Source data: ENAV, 2014; Assaeroporti, 2013; Bolzano airport, 2014. Right: Bolzano airport. Source data: ENAV, 2014. Map by Giorgia Anastasio.
0
0. 5
1. 5 km
0 0. 5
1. 5 km
M I L AN | Milan Malpensa Interna tional Air p o r t
ALTITUDE
GEOGRAPHIC COORDINATES
234 m.a.s.l.
45°37’48’’ N 8°43’23’’ E
ICAO CODE
LIMC
IATA CODE
MXP
MOVEMENTS
164 745/year
PASSENGERS
17 955 075/year
CARGO
RUNWAYS
AIRPORT AREA
1 5 2 AT L A S
430 343 tons
3 920 x 60 m asphalt 3 920 x 60 m asphalt
1 235 Ha
Source data: ENAV, 2014; Assaeroporti, 2013. Right: Malpensa airport. Source data: ENAV, 2014. Map by Giorgia Anastasio.
0
0. 5
1. 5 km
U D I NE | Udine Campoformido Airfield Civil and tourist airport.
ALTITUDE
GEOGRAPHIC COORDINATES
93 m.a.s.l.
46°01’55’’ N 13°11’13’’ E
ICAO CODE
LIPD
IATA CODE
UDN
PASSENGERS
n.a.
RUNWAYS
AIRPORT AREA
1 7 6 AT L A S
730 x 40 m I grass
171 Ha
Source data: ENAV, 2014. Right: Udine Campoformido airport. Source data: CTR, 2008. Map by Laura Cipriani.
0
0. 5
1. 5 km
L A N DMARKS
Udine Campoformido airfield
Landmarks in the environs of Udine Campoformido airport. Aerial view by Laura Cipriani.
Pasian di Prato
Udine
E C O L O G I C A L A I R P O RT U R B A N I S M 1 7 9
LOCATION
Airport green roofs. Source data: Greenroofs.com, 2011. Diagram by Laura Cipriani. 1990 1994 2002
Dock E at Zürich-Kloten International Airport (ZRH) Zurich, Swiss
YEAR OF CONSTRUCTION
Schiphol International Airport (AMS) Amsterdam, The Netherlands
AREA (m 2 )
Frankfurt International Airport (FRA) Ftrankfurt, Germany
G R E EN ROOFS
40 001 m² 13 330 m² 4 000 m²
2008 2005 2008 2009 2003 2008 2009 2008
O’Hare International Airport (ORD) Building 607, South Vault + Duct Bank Buildings Chicago, United States
Copenhagen International Airport (CPH) Kastrup Power Plant Kastrup, Denmark
O’Hare International Airport (ORD) North Air Traffic Control Base Building Chicago, United States
Port of Portland International Airport (PDX) Headquarters Portland, United States
Boeing Field County International Airport (BFI) Terminal Building Seattle, United States
O’Hare International Airport (ORD) Mount Prospect Road Guard Post Chicago, United States Chicago, United States Chicago, Stati Uniti
Vancouver International Airport (YVR) Terminal Richmond, Canada
Chicago Midway International Airport (MDW) Garage Chicago, United States
1 319 m² 1 200 m² 828 m² 913 m² 743 m² 604 m² 279 m² 295 m²
euro 46,00 isbn 978-88-548-7436-7
C ip rian i E C O L O G I C A L A I R P O RT U R B A N I S M . A I R P O RT S A N D L A N D S C A P E S I N T H E I TA L I A N N O RT H E A S T A r ac n e
Laura Ci pri ani , M a r ie C u r ie r e s e a r c h e r a t Tr e n t o U ni v e r si t y a nd v i si t i ng pr o f e sso r i n Lands ca pe Urba n is m a t Ve n ic e U n ive r s it y IU AV a nd t he P o l i t e cni co di M i l a no , w o r k s i n urban and l a n d s c a p e r e s e a r c h a n d d e s ig n . Ove r t he y e a r s, she ha s spe c i a l i se d i n the rel a ti ons hi p b e t w e e n in f r a s t r u c t u r e a n d la n d s c a pe , w i t h a co nst a nt co m m i t m e nt t o res earch and un ive r s it y t e a c h in g . She regul arl y a t t e n d s c o n f e r e n c e s o n t h e t o p i c i n a ca de m i c a nd pr o f e ssi o na l env i ronments a n d h a s p u b lis h e d h e r r e s e a r c h in se v e r a l bo o k s. “ Eco l o g i ca l A i r po r t Urbani s m” (Uni ve r s it à d i Tr e n t o , 2012) a n d “A ir p o r t U r ba ni sm ” ( A r a cne , 2 0 1 2 ) a r e he r l as t publ i ca ti ons. Laura recei v ed a Ph . D . in U r b a n is m f r o m Ve n ic e U ni v e r si t y ( I U AV) , a M a st e r ’s de g r e e (M.Des .) wi th di st in c t io n f o c u s e d o n u r b a n a n d la n d s ca pe i ssue s f r o m H a r v a r d U ni v e r si t y (Gradua te Schoo l o f D e s ig n ) a n d B a c h e lo r a n d M a st e r ’s de g r e e s i n A r chi t e ct ur e w i t h honours from Ve n ic e U n ive r s it y (IU AV ).
AIR 01
Airp o rt s p la y an i n c r eas i n g l y i m p or t an t r o l e i n c i t i e s a n d i n r e g i o n a l d e ve lo p me n t . Av i a t i on i t s el f g en er a t es s oc i al a n d e c o n o m i c b e n e f i t s f o r t h e a re a it se r ve s , b u t al s o b r i n g s w i t h i t c on s i d e r a b l e e n v i r o n m e n t a l a n d s o c i a l co st s. Wh a t d o we m ean b y ‘ec ol og i c al ai r p or t u r b ani s m ’ ? I s i t p o s s i b l e t o i n t e g r a t e la n d sca p e a n d ai r p or t i n f r as t r u c t u r e i n an e c o l o g i c a l l y - ‘ s u s t a i n a b l e ’ w a y ? Wh a t a re t h e i n f l u en c es on t h e u r b an c on t ex t? St a rt in g f ro m c as e- s t u d i es , t h i s s t u d y s eek s t o a d d r e s s m u l t i p l e i s s u e s re la t e d t o t h e u r b an an d en v i r on m en t al i m p a c t s o f a i r p o r t s a n d t o i d e n t i f y p o ssib le in t e r v en t i on s t o ac h i ev e an ‘ec o- ai r po r t s y s t e m ’ – a n i n f r a s t r u c t u r e m o d e l wit h red u c ed l an d s c a p e an d en v i r on m e n t a l i m p a c t t o b e a p p l i e d i n o t h e r re g io n a l c on t ex t s . I n p ar t i c u l ar, t h i s r es e a r c h w i l l f o c u s o n t h e N o r t h E a st o f It a l y as an ex p er i m en t al f i el d i n v es t i g a t i o n i n o r d e r t o d e v e l o p a wo rkin g m e t h o d ol og y an d s t r a t eg i c - p l an n i n g p r o p o s a l t o g u i d e t h e p l a n n i n g a n d d e sig n o f an ec ol og i c al ai r p or t s y s t em a t r e g i o n a l a n d u r b a n s c a l e .
ECOLOGICAL AIRPORT URBANISM
A I R P O RT S A N D L A N D S C A P E S I N T H E I TA L I A N N O RT H E A S T
Lau r a C i p r i an i
A r ac n e
01