Key Issues in Social Care

Page 1

Key issues in social care Focus on Wales

Julie Burton Julie Burton Law www.julieburtonlaw.co.uk


Change afoot 

The law has not changed yet in Wales

England’s Care Act 2014 came into force in England on 1 April 2015

Wales’ Social Services & Wellbeing (Wales) Act 2014 comes into force on 6 April 2016

Consultations on regulations and codes of practice being issued under the SS&WA currently ongoing

Till then, existing law, some very old and some relatively new, applies

2


Current position  • • • • • • • • • • • • • •

NHS & Community Care Act 1990 Local Government Act 2000 National Assistance Act 1948 Chronically Sick and Disabled Persons Act 1970 NHS Acts 2006 Health Services and Public Health Act 1968 Mental Health Act 1983 (as amended by MHA 2007) Carers Acts 1995, 2000, 2004 Care Standards Act 2000 and Health and Social Care (Community Health and Standards) Act 2003 Health & Social Care Act 2001 Children Act 1989 Mental Capacity Act 2005 Human Rights Act 1998 Statutory instruments Codes of practice, guidance

And so on………..


Problems/issues arising….. in no particular order (and hopelessly subjective) 

Rationing

Respite care

Health/social care divide

Charging

Transition

Mental Capacity Act 2005 and decision making

DOLS

People who need support who don’t neatly fit in social care categories

Direct payments for social and also for health care services

Legal aid (it still exists)


So – time for change? Introducing….

The Social Services & Wellbeing Wales Act 2014

Plus 

A raft of regulations and codes of practice

All due to hit the ground running in April 2016 So – are we getting any solutions to the problems?


Rationing (austerity cuts?) now 

Social care services is based on an assessment of needs; always has been

Hence it is the needs of the person, not the availability of resources, that determines service provision

But only “eligible” needs require a service response – critical and substantial (for children, position has been less clear)

A failure to provide services to meet assessed eligible need is unlawful and challengeable

Any change to service provision must be based on a fresh/updated assessment

Any change to service provision which is not based on a fresh assessment will be unlawful

So the trick is to obtain a proper assessment of needs, which comes to clear conclusions and hence provision decisions

And not to accept cuts unless a fresh assessment shows that needs have reduced

Resources is not your problem; service provision is…..so another trick is to identify the service that will meet needs i.e. have a solution ready to offer


Rationing/cuts in future under SS&WA? 

Well, the new SS&W Act sets out very clearly that service provision is to be based on a full assessment of needs

The SS&WA imposes a duty to assess the needs of adults, children and carers

This has to be done having due regard to the wellbeing of the person being assessed

As before only “eligible” needs require a service response

BUT eligible needs are now defined by proposed Regulations and are subject to guidance under Codes of Practice. These introduce the concept of a National Threshold and the “can and can only” test. In essence this introduces a last resort test. Only if social services believe that they are able and have responsibility to provide a service (the “can” element) and then only if the person can show that they cannot achieve wellbeing outcomes merely with the assistance of others such that social services are required to step in (the “can only” element) – then they are eligible. The draft Code states in terms “the adoption of this process will mean that fewer people will require care and support intervention through the planning and delivery of a care and support plan by local authorities”.

There are exceptions to this can and can only test for abuse/neglect cases


Respite care 

Seen as a service to the person needing support services, not the carer

Particularly subject to rationing

If it is identified as a need then it must be provided

Biggest problem is finding it when social services say they have nothing to offer….


Respite services under the SS&WA 

No significant change save that this is of course subject to the new eligibility criteria…….


Social/health care divide 

Health services are free

Health complete a Decision Support Tool to determine who is eligible for health services e.g. when some one is due to be discharged from hospital and/or when requested

Social care services are chargeable according to means of the person receiving the services

Social services have a discretion to charge for social care services except for residential care services for which they must charge

Historically children services have been free but not so in at least one N Wales local authority area, and more may follow

The trick is to ensure that Health regularly consider whether they are responsible – if there is a change in needs for the worse, get a fresh assessment. Know what the criteria are and be prepared to marshal evidence


Charging under the SS&WA 

No significant changes

Unlike England, thus far there is no suggestion of a life time cap for social care charging (in England the introduction of this cap has been delayed)

However, the current cap on charges for domiciliary care that exists in Wales but not in England, currently £60 per week, looks set to continue


Transition 

The black hole that opens up at about 16 and doesn’t close again until about 20

This is about social services delivery management – where children services and adult services don’t speak and support differently

The trick is to start badgering very early and never stop.


Transition under the SS&WA 

Not specifically addressed so don’t expect any changes….eligibility will be key

But as provision for children is specifically dealt with alongside that of adults, the hope may be for more joined up thinking?


Mental Capacity Act and decision making 

Parents of children under the age of 18 have parental responsibility for them and are able to make decisions for them (with exceptions for capable young people from about 15 or 16 onwards)

When a young person turns 18, either they make decisions for themselves or, if they lack capacity to do so, decisions must be made for them in their best interests following MCA principles

The difficult thing for parents of learning disabled children or family members with ABI is accepting that others, not they, make decisions from age 18 on

The trick is to know and understand the MCA best interests checklist and be prepared in advance with evidence of what has been done successfully in the past

And to know that where there is a dispute about how to meet needs in the best interests of some one without capacity, the Court of Protection an be asked to decide

NB some young people with marginal capacity to make decisions for themselves may be able to execute a Lasting Power of Attorney


DOLS 

Cheshire West case March 2014 – changed the landscape

Where some one is under complete control/supervision of others and is not free to leave, then they are deprived of their liberty

This is only lawful if either they have capacity to consent and they do consent or if due process of law has been followed

At present this means either an authorisation under the existing statutory arrangements (DOLS, part of the MCA) or via an application to the Court of Protection for specific authorisation

The Court of Protection can authorise a dol for a young person aged 16 plus


Changes to DOLS 

The SS&WA does not deal with this

BUT 

The Law Commission is currently working on proposals for the wholesale repeal of the existing arrangements and their replacement with a completely new scheme

Watch this space – anticipated new arrangements will be in place by 2019

In the mean time, we have to continue to use DOLS/s21A authorisations


People who don’t fit… 

Asperger’s syndrome

ADHD

Borderline LD – 71 IQ

CAMHS v children with disabilities service

Parenting courses……….

The duty is to assess and meet eligible needs. But where some one’s needs are not neatly categorised this can be almost impossible

The trick thus far has been persistence and external evidence gathering


The future? 

The duty to assess is very clear

Eligibility criteria may pose a hurdle

These do not apply in cases of abuse/neglect

The problem of social services silos has not gone away


Direct payments for health funded care 

In England, health personal budgets exist and operate like direct payments only for health funded care

In Wales there is no provision for health funded DP type care

We need it

There is nothing on the agenda

Can we use personal independent user trusts?


Legal aid 

There is still LEGAL AID

This is subject to a means and merits test for challenges to social services decision making

In some children cases it is the child’s means that are considered (but for advice and assistance only, i.e. basic level legal aid, it is the parents’ means that determine eligibility)

There is free legal aid to challenge DOLS authorisations

It is a myth that all legal aid has gone. It has not. Just most of it! Use it!


so 

Brave new future

Different and new challenges will arise no doubt

Some old problems continue

Watch out for cross border problems

Remember England has a very different scheme to Wales

And most of this doesn’t happen for a few more months any way!!!


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.