C votersguide green edition

Page 1

gEnERal ElEC TI o n 20 1 7

Your ballot is in the mail The ballots – 23,978 of them, including yours – are in the mail for the Nov. 7 general election. Ballots were to be mailed today, Wednesday, Oct. 18. Voters can expect them by Friday or Saturday, said Betty Johnson, a Jefferson County elections official. Any registered voter who doesn’t get a ballot by

that time can call the county auditor’s office at 360385-9117 and ask for one. Ballots for voters living overseas and those in the military were posted earlier, and Johnson reports that some of those ballots already have been returned. As for turnout this year, Johnson said she dislikes

guessing, but suspects the turnout could reach 65 percent. “I don’t think we’ll have less than 65 percent,” she said. For those who have moved into the state but aren’t registered to vote in Washington, there’s still See BALLOTS, page 5▼

Port of Port Townsend Commission candidates (from left) Bill Putney, Brad Clinefelter, Keith Beck and Peter Hanke sit at the Port Townsend Community Center during an Oct. 12 forum sponsored by the Port Townsend Marine Trades Association. Photo by Chris Tucker

Port candidates discuss future, economy CHRIS TUCKER CTUCKER@PTLEADER.COM Four candidates for two Port of Port Townsend Commission seats talked about what they’d like to do at the port during an Oct. 12 forum at the Port Townsend Community Center. The event was sponsored by the Port Townsend Marine Trades Association. Bill Putney is challenging incumbent Brad Clinefelter for the District 2 seat. Keith Beck is challenging incumbent Peter Hanke for

the District 3 position. POINT HUDSON VISION When asked what his vision is for Point Hudson, Putney said, “Point Hudson is the anchor for the historic district. Substantially changing the flavor of what Point Hudson is puts it in jeopardy,” Putney said. Putney favors having the port control Point Hudson rather than letting the Northwest Maritime Center control it. “The port is responsible to

the entire citizenry of Jefferson County,” Putney said, but other groups were only “responsible to their own board, their own objectives and ends.” Clinefelter said Point Hudson is a “wonderful, unique facility that’s the front door of our community and our maritime heritage.” Clinefelter said a grant-funded feasibility study is currently in progress and that the question of how much control the Northwest Maritime Center might have over Point Hudson would be determined

when the study is completed. “Everybody knows about the talks going on with the Maritime Center, and perhaps there will be an arrangement … where there will be some shared responsibilities, or a complete shift,” Clinefelter said. “Nothing is going to be done to destroy that character,” he said of Point Hudson. Beck said he once lived at Point Hudson and favors having the city, county and port collaborate on the point’s future. “There’s a lot you can do with

that area. It could be an income to the county, the port and to the city,” Beck said. “It’s going to cost a lot of money on all sides and so all sides should be a part of it,” Beck said. Hanke said he does not want to see the character of Point Hudson change at all. “The mix of businesses that are there are right,” Hanke said. “You’ve got restaurants, you’ve got kayaks, you’ve got Carol [Hasse with Port Townsend Sails], and what we do See PORT, page 5▼

Prop. 1 supporters seek to clear up misconceptions BY KIRK BOXLEITNER KBOXLEITNER@PTLEADER.COM Proposition 1 proponents Bruce Cowan and wife Deborah Pedersen, of the Homes Now! campaign, say they’ve been fielding a lot of questions, framed as statements of fact, that are incorrect. The two say they are spending time correcting misconceptions, rather than talking about the details of Proposition 1, the proposed Home Opportunity Fund patterned after a Bellingham housing levy that was approved in 2012. If the proposition is approved by Jefferson County voters on the Nov. 7 ballot, Jefferson County would be the first county in the state to approve a levy that would raise property taxes to support affordable housing. Washington cities, including Bellingham, Seattle and Vancouver, have approved similar levies. Here, Cowan and Pedersen respond to a number of misconceptions about Proposition 1: Statement: The supporters of Proposition 1 are all members of Homeward Bound, a nonprofit organization that the City of Port Townsend has contracted to help turn a fourplex from Victoria, British Columbia, into affordable

housing, and Proposition 1 is aimed at bailing out the City A nine-member Home Opportunity Fund of Port Townsend on that project. committee, selected by county commissioners, would be given the task of weighing the eligibilBruce Cowan’s response: “The city is not in ity of affordable housing proposals made to the the housing business, nor does it want to be. county. Neither is the county, really. We are disappointed People on the committee would be selected that the city went ahead in supporting a project the same way as all other advisory boards, by whose organization had not yet developed the submitting applications and being selected capacity to follow through,” he added, referring through a public process, Cowan said. to the Cherry Street apartments and Homeward “This committee is supposed to represent the Bound. “I think a week and a half ago, I paid citizens’ public oversight,” Deborah Pedersen some dues for Homeward Bound, but it’s been added. “We’ll have representatives from each largely dormant for seven or eight years. We commissioner district, to speak for people haven’t invoked its name.” throughout the county.” Conservation Futures, Mental Health and Statement: The Home Opportunity Fund would only Lodging Tax Advisory committees were all benefit the organizations that are supporting it, and those appointed the same way, Pedersen said. The nine organizations would decide which groups get the money. voting members of the Home Opportunity Fund committee would not include board members of Cowan: The Home Opportunity Fund would any organizations that stand to benefit from the be a county fund, awarded to “rigorously ana- revenue. lyzed” proposals, submitted by organizations that “have demonstrated the competency and Statement: Money collected throughout Jefferson County capacity to build, manage and maintain” their would only benefit projects in Port Townsend. proposed affordable housing projects for 40 years or more. Cowan: The county’s Department of

Community Development has concluded that multifamily development would be possible in village centers such as Quilcene, Brinnon and Discovery Bay, pending evaluations of the capacity of their shared septic systems. “OlyCAP has approved a septic system for 14 units in Port Hadlock,” Cowan said. While the Home Opportunity Fund would favor local organizations that have demonstrated their capability, Cowan suggested the fund could draw both regional developers and private organizations to partner with their efforts. He added that not all projects would be built in Port Townsend. Statement: There are viable tax sources other than property taxes, such as sales taxes and real estate excise taxes, that could be used for housing projects. Cowan: “We examined several alternatives. We would have been able to collect only a very small amount through a sales tax, maybe $500,000 to $1 million a year. San Juan is the only county in the state that’s eligible to levy a real estate excise tax. That left a property tax See PROPOSITION 1, page 5▼


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.