NORTH AN KHANH SATELLITE TOWN AND THE SEARCH FOR A SUITABLE URBAN STRUCTURE FOR HANOI Hoang Huu Phe, Vinaconex R&D Email: hhp-vncn@hn.vnn.vn Abstract: Globalisation and the rise of the knowledge economy have posed a number of serious challenges to the socio-economic strategies which are in danger of becoming obsolete in the developing countries, among them Vietnam. The newest concepts in urban development, based on latest findings in the field of urban studies, are forcing theorists and planners alike to look at subtle measures aimed at improving the vitality of the city – which according to modern consensus can be regarded as the engine for the whole economy. The vitality of the city is manifested in its degree of competitiveness which is an important parameter in the context of global competition. The competitiveness of the city cannot exist without a suitable urban structure. In this article, we will analyse the development of the North An Khanh New Town as an important step in the search for an urban structure suitable for Hanoi, a city on the way to becoming an important player with significant competitive potentials in the region as well as on the global market.
The vitality of the city The mid 70s witnessed a generally pessimistic outlook, at least among academic circles, on issues relating to urban affairs. In the developed countries, the shift from an economic order based on the Fordist mode of production, with its emphasis on speed, volume, quality, and low cost (a philosophy founded and named after Henry Ford), towards one based on the principles of JIT (just-in-time) production, has lead to a large disconnect between the skill and knowledge level of a large sector of the urban population and the demands of the new, so-called high tech industries. Unemployment running at double figures, the repercussion of the war in Vietnam, increasing cost of energy resulting from the oil crises of 1973, all conspired to push the cities in the West, especially in America, into a period of relative decline. A number of urban theorists have even predicted the total collapse of the urban order as we know it. However, the mid 1980s onwards witnessed a remarkable recovery, not only in the functioning of the large urban centres, but also in their understanding by researchers and practitioners in the field. The urban resurgence has lead to renewed debates on the very origin and development of the city itself. Classical urban theories have held that the concentration of people and the means of production (agglomeration) have resulted from the need to minimise transportation cost and to optimise the means of production. However, despite transportation costs reducing by some 90% in real terms over the past century, the often-predicted demise of the city has not come about. Subsequently, the main driver for the concentration of population has been attributed to an entirely different cause: the desire for face - to - face contact, facilitating the formulation and exchange of creative ideas (Hall, 2000, Glaeser, 2006). The last half century has seen numerous such instances where seemingly highly theoretical ideas have quickly developed into real life industries commanding immense wealth: examples include the growth of information technology in Silicon Valley, biotechnology in the Cambridge corridor, or high tech manufacturing clusters in Taiwan. From these examples, we can readily conclude that city is the physical location where the economy based on knowledge takes roots. The life of the city has, therefore, returned to the humanist roots which have given rise to the cities in the first place.
1