The Differences and Risks between Open and Closed Irrigation Systems and Regularly Reviewed Systems
FEATURE
Rick Malda, CLIA, CIT, WSIP
President, Arizona Outdoor Solutions
The Differences and Risks between Open and Closed Irrigation Systems and Regularly Reviewed Systems Note: City of Hamilton raises water rates 4.11% in 2020
I
n the irrigation business, until about 10 years ago it was standard to offer out contract services to simply open and close sprinkler systems. While it has begun to turn around in the last number of years it is still a fairly common practice.
Open/Close Contract: Spring Opening - The water main is secured, sprinklers are tested, and control panels set and ready to go for the watering months. Fall Closing - This portion involves the removal of water with compressed air in the main line, zone lateral lines, valves and sprinklers to ensure a safe dormant period during the harsh northern winter months. Simply put, with the opening and closing - the system gets turned on, and then turned offon contract. This type of contract leaves much to be desired in terms of the effectiveness of nearly any irrigation system. The trouble with it being the time of year that these systems are opened. Typically, mid April to late May, no matter what company you are, this time is a frenzy. Every available technician and truck are utilized and organized to visit every site, ensuring they are all
14
G O L D E N H O R SESHOE CHAPTER OF THE CANADIA N CO N D O MI N I U M I NSTI TUTE
