ARCHI TECTUR E PO R TFOLIO
H U Y
My p ract ic e Vung Tau Marriott Hotel & Appartment
K ey pr oje c ts
Copcept design. Principle: Fumitake Yokoyama My role: Illustrate chief’s idea Propose facade design. Render.
Regional bus terminal Cholon Hochiminh Copcept design. Principle: Fumitake Yokoyama My role: Propose form & facade design. Render.
Sacomreal Appartment Copcept design. Principle: Fumitake Yokoyama My role: Building models & illustrate Chief’s idea. Propose design for pool area. Render.
Interior design Architecture design Documentation
Huong Bien Hotel Interior design Interior design (built) Principle: Fumitake Yokoyama My role: Propose design for standard room & render.
Hoi An M-Gallery
KEY PLAN:
GR.CO.WD.01
GR.CO.WD.02 WALL LIGHTING 02
Interior design (built) Principle: Koichiro Horiuchi
GR.CO.PT.03
ROOM NUMBER t=5 H= 3.5 cm STAINLESS GOLD COLOR GR.CO.PT.01
STT - NO.
MÔ TẢ - DESCRIPTION
NGÀY - DATE
GIAI ĐOẠN THIẾT KẾ | PROJECT STATUS
INDIRECT LIGHTING GR.CO.PT.01
THIẾT KẾ KỸ THUẬT / DEVELOPMENT DESIGN
ST C 10X10X2 BACKING
GR.CO.PT.02
030
MÃ SỐ DỰ ÁN | PROJECT NUMBER
CHỦ ĐẦU TƯ - OWNER
My role: Document standard rooms. Illustrate chief’s idea.
CÔNG TY CỔ PHẦN ĐẦU TƯ TẬP ĐOÀN HOÀNG GIA HỘI AN Địa chỉ: 448 , ĐƯỜNG HAI BÀ TRƯNG , TP HỘI AN
SECTION C-C SCALE 1:2
ĐƠN VỊ TƯ VẤN THIẾT KẾ- CONSULTANT
CÔNG TY TNHH THIẾT KẾ CHÂU Á KUME
WALL GR.CO.PT.01
KUME DESIGN ASIA
GR.CO.PT.01
Văn phòng chính: Địa chỉ: Tầng 4,Tòa nhà CDC, 25-27 Lê Đại Hành, Quận Hai Bà Trưng, Hà Nội, Việt Nam ĐT: +84 4 3 974 4924 | FAX: +84 4 3 974 4925 Chi nhánh Tp Hồ Chí Minh: Địa chỉ: Tầng 21,Lim Tower, 9-11TÔN ĐỨC THẮNG, Quận 1, TP.Hồ Chí Minh, Việt Nam ĐT: +84 8 3 821 8796 | FAX: +84 8 3 821 8798
PHÓ TỔNG GIÁM ĐỐC - DEPUTY GENERAL DIRECTOR:
ST L 10X10X2 BACKING DETAIL B SCALE 1:2 GR.CO.PT.01
YASUYUKI NAKAMURA CHỦ NHIỆM PRIMARY ARCHITECT
KTS. KOICHIRO HORIUCHI
CHỦ TRÌ THIẾT KẾ CHIEF ARCHITECT
KTS. PHAN QUỲNH DUNG
NHÓM THIẾT KẾ DESIGN TEAM
KTS. PHẠM MINH DŨNG KTS. ĐỖ LÊ VY KTS. HÀ HỒNG LĨNH
DETAIL B
DETAIL B
CÔNG TRÌNH - ĐỊA ĐIỂM - PROJECT - LOCATION
KHÁCH SẠN HOÀNG GIA HỘI AN HOTEL ROYAL HOI AN MGALLERY COLLECTION ĐỊA ĐIỂM : KHU DÂN CƯ PHƯỜNG CẨM PHÔ - TP HỘI AN HẠNG MỤC - ITEMS
THIẾT KẾ KỸ THUẬT TẦNG 3 DEVELOPMENT DESIGN OF 3TH FLOOR TÊN BẢN VẼ - SHEET NAME
NGÀY HOÀN THÀNH DATE
15.05.2014
TỶ LỆ SCALE
SỐ BẢN VẼ SHEET NUMBER
DD.CO.21
Phu Quoc Novotel Architecture & Interior design (built) Principle: Koichiro Horiuchi My role: Produce DD drawing for Spa, bar & Lobby. Illustrate chief’s idea.
PHU QUOC INVESTMENT & DEVELOPMENT JSC ADD: 324 Nguyen Trung Truc, Duong Dong Ward Phu Quoc, Kien Giang, Vietnam
KUME DESIGN ASIA Co.,Ltd., Hanoi Headquaters
ADD: CDC Building, 4F, 25-27 Le Dai Hanh str. | Hai Ba Trung dist. Hanoi, Vietnam TEL: +84 4 3 974 4924 | FAX: +84 4 3 974 4825
No.
Description
Date
Thi Sach Apartment
Location: Hochiminh city, Vietnam Concept Design Chef architect: Fumitake Yokoyame Illustrator: Huy Luong
P r ac t ic al pr oj e c t
N
B1F
N
3-14F
THI SACH STREET
NGUYEN SIEU STREET
N
N
1F
15-18F
Location: Hoian, Quang Nam, Vietnam Interior Design Chef architect: Koichiro Horiuchi Corridor Drawing by Huy Luong
M-Gallery Hoian
Interior Document - typical corridor KEY PLAN:
4
6
8
9
D'
GR.CO.TE.01
D
GR.CO.TL.01
GR.CO.TE.01 GR.CO.TL.01 STT - NO.
M
GIAI ĐOẠN THIẾT KẾ | PRO
+ 8.700
THIẾT KẾ KỸ THUẬT MÃ SỐ DỰ ÁN | PROJECT
C
CHỦ ĐẦU TƯ - OWNER
CÔNG TY TẬP ĐOÀN
Địa chỉ: 448 , ĐƯỜN
KEY PLAN:
10
GR.CO.WP.01
13
11
GR.CO.GL.01/ GR.CO.MT.01/
GR.CO.WD.01
15
17
ĐƠN VỊ TƯ VẤN THIẾT
CÔN
KUME DESIGN ASIA
Văn p Địa c Quận ĐT: + Chi n Địa c Quận ĐT: +
02
D'
PHÓ TỔNG GIÁM
D
CHỦ NHIỆM PRIMARY ARCHITECT
KTS
CHỦ TRÌ THIẾT KẾ
GR.CO.WD.02 GR.CO.TL.026
8
KTS
NHÓM THIẾT KẾ DESIGN TEAM
9
KTS
KTS
GR.CO.WD.01
GR.CO.WP.01
GR.CO.TL.01
CHIEF ARCHITECT
GR.CO.PT.04
KTS
CÔNG TRÌNH - ĐỊA ĐIỂM
KHÁCH M HOTEL ROYAL H GIAI ĐOẠN THIẾT KẾ | PRO
STT - NO.
ĐỊA ĐIỂM : KHU DÂN C HẠNG MỤC - ITEMS
THIẾT KẾ KỸ THUẬT THIẾ
MÃ SỐ DỰ ÁN | PROJECT DEVELOPM
C
TÊN N CHỦBẢN ĐẦUVẼ TƯ- SHEET - OWNER
CÔNG TY TẬP ĐOÀN
NGÀY HOÀN Địa chỉ: 448THÀNH , ĐƯỜN DATE
15.05.2014
GR.CO.PT.04
10
11
GR.CO.WD.02 KEY PLAN:
13 GR.CO.WD.01
GR.CO.WD.02
ĐƠN VỊ TƯ VẤN THIẾT
CÔN
WALL LIGHTING 02
KUME
GR.CO.PT.03
DESIGN ASIA
Văn p Địa c Quận ĐT: + Chi n Địa c Quận ĐT: +
PHÓ TỔNG GIÁM
PAINTED PATTERN INDIRECT LIGHTING ROOM NUMBER t=5 H= 3.5 cm STAINLESS GOLD COLOR
CHỦ NHIỆM PRIMARY ARCHITECT CHỦ TRÌ THIẾT KẾ
KTS
CHIEF ARCHITECT
GR.CO.PT.01
GR.CO.MT.01/
NHÓM THIẾT KẾ DESIGN TEAM
KTS
KTS
GR.CO.WP.01
KTS
KTS
GR.CO.WD.01
CÔNG TRÌNH - ĐỊA ĐIỂM
KHÁCH HOTEL ROYAL H
ĐỊA ĐIỂM : KHU DÂN C
HẠNG MỤC - ITEMS STT - NO. MÔ THIẾ
GIAI ĐOẠN THIẾT KẾ | PROJ
DEVELOPM
TÊN BẢN VẼ - SHEET N
GR.CO.PT.04 INDIRECT LIGHTING GR.CO.PT.01
THIẾT KẾ KỸ THUẬT /
GR.CO.PT.02
ST C 10X10X2 BACKING
MÃ SỐ DỰ ÁN | PROJECT NU
CHỦ ĐẦU TƯ - OWNER NGÀY HOÀN THÀNH
DATE TY C CÔNG TẬP15.05.2014 ĐOÀN H
Địa chỉ: 448 , ĐƯỜN
SECTION C-C SCALE 1:2
ĐƠN VỊ TƯ VẤN THIẾT K
Freelanc e r Personal project.
Interior design Furniture design
I nt er ior des i g n
Parallel with the professional work in the architecture firm, I also challenged myself with freelancer projects. The personal projects gave me a chance to execute what I did learn from projects in the company I work in. Especially, negotiating with clients, project manager, suppliers and tenders is the most valuable lesson. Further, through this project, I also enriched my design, technical, and time management.
Dean’s office interior
3dsmax & Vray
Dean’s office interior drawings
Auto CAD
F u rn i tu re d e s i g n
CHỦ ĐẦU TƯ | OWNER
ĐƠN VỊ THIẾT KẾ | CONSULTANT
BỆNH VIỆN CHỢ RẪY
DỰ ÁN | PROJECT NAME
THIẾT KẾ NỘI THẤT BỆNH VIỆN CHỢ RẪY
LƯƠNG TRẦN GIA HUY
TÊN BẢN VẼ | SHEET NAME No. NGÀY / DATE
CHỦ ĐẦU TƯ | OWNER
Description
CHI TIẾT TỦ QUẦY TIẾP NHẬN BỆNH
Date
06 / 2014
ĐƠN VỊ THIẾT KẾ | CONSULTANT
BỆNH VIỆN CHỢ RẪY
TỶ LỆ | SCALE
1:20
SỐ HIỆU BẢN VẼ | SHEET NUMBER
D-05-03
DỰ ÁN | PROJECT NAME
THIẾT KẾ NỘI THẤT BỆNH VIỆN CHỢ RẪY
LƯƠNG TRẦN GIA HUY
TÊN BẢN VẼ | SHEET NAME No. NGÀY / DATE
CHỦ ĐẦU TƯ | OWNER
BỆNH VIỆN CHỢ RẪY
ĐƠN VỊ THIẾT KẾ | CONSULTANT
Description 06 / 2014
DỰ ÁN | PROJECT NAME
THIẾT KẾ NỘI THẤT BỆNH VIỆN CHỢ RẪY
LƯƠNG TRẦN GIA HUY
TÊN BẢN VẼ | SHEET NAME No. NGÀY / DATE
Description 06 / 2014
Date
CHI TIẾT TỦ PHÒNG HỌP ST06 - ST06 B
TỶ LỆ | SCALE
1:20
SỐ HIỆU BẢN VẼ | SHEET NUMBER
D-05-01
Date
CHI TIẾT CHẬU HOA PHÒNG CHỜ
TỶ LỆ | SCALE
1:20
SỐ HIỆU BẢN VẼ | SHEET NUMBER
D-05-02
M ast er st udi o Future library
I n- f o- si g h t
STUDYING and GATHERING are the two prominent values that should contain in the future library. STUDYING is authentic quality but GATHERING is future opportunity. The gathering space compensates the vacancy of the current paper books, prevents isolation, and widespreads the knowledge in hegemonic era of technology.
Site This selected site is located in the Northwest coner of Melbourne CBD. 400m faraway to the North from the key Public Transport hub, Flagstaff Station. The site faces to beautiful Flagstaff garden and a ‘turing point’ where the road network turn in to true North direction.
Function Program Aims: storing and spreading knowledge to community through varying of studying modes. Study zone: private and traditional studying mode. Gather zone: Discussing, composing knowlede. Improve spcial connection and active studying. Gallery: publishing knowledge.
Distinctive project Exhibited in Paper Space 2018 Revit modeling
Design responds Conjuncting two green space by creating a lanway accross the building. Emphasising the coner facing to Flagstaff station by an abstract entrance. Accomodating areas follow its privacy range.
Concept ‘Turning point’ is this project’s concept. Reflect the urban context such as turning road network and decrease of building density. Appropriate with the triagluar site.
Design Method Making models base on Parti diagram. Developing design through serial of interations.
1 Auto Printing
Auto Printing
Service hall
Gallery store
Gallery Activity zones
Lobby
1
Ground floor plan
Revit
Section 1-1
Revit
Message for future Not futuristic form but the role of the building to future society. Gathering for gaining knowledge is the main concern of this proposal. Movable element, such as a rotating auditorium could propose deeper engaging to knowledge for public and enhance social connection.
Entrance Axo
Revit
Resolut io n
Academic project
Libr a ry
Initial design
The original design idea is inspired by an opening book. But the idea was distorted by practical dimension and the site. This project tries to resolute the previous design base on the original concept.
ORIGINAL DESIGN GROUND FLOOR PLAN
COMMUNITY LIBRARY PROJECT
SCALE 1:50
ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN & RESOLUTION SRD765
Clarify & develop
STUDENT ID: TUTOR:
216006445
DARWING BY:
HUY LUONG
JAMES COULSON
DARWING No:
DATE: 15/11/2017
A quadrant is original idea that represents for an opening book. The quadrant was broken, divided, overlaid to create a set of new articulated architecture language.
STRUCTURE
10°
MAIN HALL 1ST FLOOR PLAN
COMMUNITY LIBRARY PROJECT
SCALE 1:20
ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN & RESOLUTION SRD765
216006445
STUDENT ID:
STRUCTURE JAMES COULSON
TUTOR:
HIERARCHY
10
10°
0°
DRAWING BY:
HUY LUONG
DRAWING No:
17/01/2018
DATE: GEOMETRY
HIERARCHY
SYMMETRY & BALANCE
Development Base on the new language, the initial design was retrofitted. The result shows the inspiration of the original shape into multiscale as general floor plan to the main entrance area and even in detail scale such as precast concrete blocks.
ORDER PRINCIPLE
COMMUNITY LIBRAR
SCALE 1:200
10°
10°
ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN & RE
10
0°
SYMMETRY & BALANCE
GEOMETRY
ORDER PRINCIPLE
COMMUNITY LIBRARY PROJECT
SCALE 1:200
ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN & RESOLUTION SRD765
1ST FLOOR PLAN
COMMUNITY LIBRARY PROJECT
SCALE 1:50
ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN & RESOLUTION SRD765
STUDENT ID TUTOR:
CURVE WALL PREFABRICATI
STUDENT ID: TUTOR:
216006445
DRAWING BY:
HUY LUONG
JAMES COULSON
DRAWING No:
DATE: 31/01/2018
Detail design This precast concrete blocks were developed base on the subsequent of original design idea. These blocks are assembled into a beautiful wall that divides “served” and “servant” space.
DETAIL REFAB COMPONENT AXONOMETRIC SCALE 1:10
DETAIL REFAB COMPONENT AXONOMETRIC SCALE 1:10
BRICATION CONCRETE DETAIL
COMMUNITY LIBRARY PROJECT
SCALE 1:5
ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN & RESOLUTION SRD765
ONCRETE DETAIL
COMMUNITY LIBRARY PROJECT
SCALE 1:5
ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN & RESOLUTION SRD765
ain lounge
STUDENT ID: TUTOR:
216006445
DRAWING BY:
HUY LUONG
JAMES COULSON
DRAWING No:
DATE: 24/01/2018
STUDENT ID: TUTOR:
216006445
DRAWING BY:
HUY LUONG
JAMES COULSON
DRAWING No:
DATE: 24/01/2018
Mark e t
Academic ArchiCAD modeling
B ac helor P r oj e c t
Design concept
Site Analyse
Ground floor plan
ArchiCAD
Detail 2
Detail 1
ArchiCAD
ArchiCAD
Section A-A ArchiCAD
Design Research F or m A nalog u e
An aluminium museum for Geelong
Academic Schematic Design
Form finding process SRR741 Design Research Studio 2018
Relying on the succeed of Bilbal Phenomenon, this project tried to revitalise the post-industrial zone, Point Herrenry. An museum with abstractive form is the aim of this project.
Iteration
N A ME: H U Y LU ONG
SC H EM AT
Reflectiv
03
A sheaf of p point of this Significantly display char bent.
Inspied by the aluminum industry in the past of this land, swirling aluminum ribon is the main element of this design. 01 A
01 B
Parallel curv to enhance t ribbons. Bending pap created an a
SRR741 Design Research Studio 2018
Iteration
03
N A ME: HU Y L U O NG
S C HEM AT
Reflectiv
02
A ribbon was position. The special r emphasize i The result sh The newly ad gap. Further, the so equal.
03 A
03 B
Some ribbon emphasizing However, th
SRR741 Design Research Studio 2018
Iteration
03
04 A
NAME : HU Y LU ONG
SCHE MAT
04 B
Reflectiv
Next, the mo ribbons. The ribbons extened and But in top vi looked like h diameter we papers wen
Site Plan
05 A
05 B
05 C
In this stage point were t were adjust forcal point The model is
06 A
06 B
06 C
Key p
The b mate alum shine from refle surro alum
SRR741 Design Research Studio 2018
NAME : HUY LUONG
SCHE MAT I C D E S IG N
SRR741 Design Research Studio 2018
External Sectionview
NAME: H U Y LU O NG
SCHEMATIC DESIGN
Ground floor plan
Key plan
Section 1-1 exposes gallery spaces that twist around the main hall. The gaps between curve wall penetrate natural lighting into the showroom.
the plan proposed main entrance in the west side. The looby connects in the middle connect diiferent functional areas.
SECTION 1 1:150 @ A3
Section
F1 PLAN 1:300 @ A3 13
SRR741 Design Research Studio 2018
Visitor experiment
N AME: HUY LUONG
14
SCSRR741 HEMATIC DESIGN Design Research Studio 2018
NAME: HUY L UO N G
Visitor experiment
Key plan
Key plan
The main lobby is the starting point but also the end point of the twist ramps. The lobby opens an extra view to the Corrio Bay and receives gorgeous lighting effect from the above curving structure.
The main ga view to the ceiling bring space. The s up and the c the extraord come from
Further, the interior space is white painted to highlight the external land scape.
Lobby view
S CHEMA T
Gallery view 15
Interior view
Copyright © - State Government of Victoria
Aboriginal culture heritage sensitive
Initiating a project
Due to the character of the building activities, the project do not need to repair a culture heritage management plan.
Academic Built Environment Professional Practice subject
Desi gn s er v ic e P r opo s a l
Planning scheme analyse
Copyright © - State Government of Victoria
Building max height and setback, site coverage Building setback (Reg. 409 2006)
Minimum setback for corner allotment is defined as the same setback distance of the front wall of the adjacent existing building with the front street side and the same setback distance of the front wall of the adjacent existing building with the side street side.
Maximum height (Reg. 410 2006)
The building maximum height is 9 meters from the natural ground level.
Propose working schedule
Site coverage and permeability (Reg. 411, 412 2006) & Yarra Clause 22.10-3.6 Stages Stages construction construction
Week Week 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0 0
1 1 1 1
1 1 2 2
1 1 3 3
1 1 4 4
1 1 5 5
1 1 6 6
1 1 7 7
1 1 8 8
1 1 9 9
2 2 0 0
2 2 1 1
2 2 2 2
2 2 3 3
2 2 4 4
2 2 5 5
2 2 6 6
2 2 7 7
Schematic design Schematic design
Development Design Development Design
planning permission planning permission process process Documentation Documentation Tendering and Tendering and Negotiation Negotiation Site preparation Site preparation Breaking earth Breaking earth Completion of Completion of foundations and foundations and basement. basement. 1st floor complete 1st floor complete 2nd floor complete 2nd floor complete 3rd floor complete 3rd floor complete roof complete roof complete Plumbing and Plumbing and electrics. electrics. Interior finishing Interior finishing Landscaping Landscaping Contract Contract Administration Administration Post contract. Post contract.
• • • • consultant consultant
SRM 750 – Assignment 1 LUONG TRAN GIA HUY
Fees & service list
Fees for architecture services package Fees for architecture services package Considered factors such as construction value, project context, L.YUH architect expect to receive 8,5% of Considered factors such as construction value, project context, L.YUH architect expect to receive 8,5% of total construction cost which equivalent to 64,000 Au$ for full consultant services. total construction cost which equivalent to 64,000 Au$ for full consultant services. Fees Schedule of Proposal Services Fees Schedule of Proposal Services Architecture proposal service Australia Time Percentage Cost as Architecture proposal service Australia Time Percentage Cost as market estimation breaking (%) percentage market estimation breaking (%) percentage average (Au$) (week) (Au$) average (Au$) (week) (Au$) Schematic design 5,500 2 weeks 18% 11,520 Schematic design 5,500 2 weeks 18% 11,520 Development Design 3,500 2 weeks 12% 7,680 Development Design 3,500 2 weeks 12% 7,680 Documentation 27,000 6 weeks 40% 25,600 Documentation 27,000 6 weeks 40% 25,600 Tendering and Negotiation 10,000 1 weeks 2.5% 1,600 Tendering and Negotiation 10,000 1 weeks 2.5% 1,600 Contract Administration 10,000 15 weeks 25% 16,000 Contract Administration 10,000 15 weeks 25% 16,000 Post contract 5,000 1 weeks 2.5% 1,600 Post contract 5,000 1 weeks 2.5% 1,600 Total 61,000 27 weeks 100% 64,000 Total 61,000 27 weeks 100% 64,000 9 SRM 750 – Assignment 1 LUONG TRAN GIA HUY 9 SRM 750 – Assignment 1 LUONG TRAN GIA HUY
2
Estimating building
Academic Cost Planning subject
Cost explanation in DD stage 7780
6490
1080
1680
3140
7640
3140
7640
6330
15210
20030 7780
6490
1080
1680
6330 ROOF
1240
1680
1240
1680
31.5234 sqm
4820
4980
3000
Building area calculation
15210
20030
3000
4980
SRQ 762 Cost Planning Assignment 2. SRQ 762 Cost Planning Assignment 2.
ROOF
4980 3440 3440 8330
146.9737 sqm
1680
1100
10900
840
ROOF 4.2238 sqm
8.1663 sqm
4890 8330
8.1663 sqm
4310
15210
980 4890
146.9737 sqm
ROOF 4.2238 sqm 2040
BALCONY BALCONY
5840
21.0766 sqm
8330 5840
21.0766 sqm
ROOF ROOF
8330
FIRST FL
1670 980
4310 20030
FIRST FL
2490
10.2648 sqm
3000
12000
5030
10.2648 sqm
164.5503 sqm
840 5030
PORTICO PORTICO
14290
164.5503 sqm
2490
GROUND FL
2040
4980
8420 14290
17.604 sqm 17.604 sqm
ALFRESCO ALFRESCO
GROUND FL
3000 350
5630 350
13450
5630
13450
4820
8420
31.5234 sqm
Total GFA of ground floor plan: 192.4191 sqm Total GFA of first level: 146.9737 sqm Including enclose and unenclosed area which Excluding balcony and sun-shadings area. Total GFA of ground floor plan: 192.4191 sqm Total GFA of first level: 146.9737 sqm include alfresco and portico. Perimeter: 47.08 m Including enclose and unenclosed area which Excluding balcony and sun-shadings area. Perimeter: 68.64m Wall area= 47.08x2.5=117.7 sqm include alfresco and portico. Perimeter: 47.08 m Wall area= 68.64x2.5=171.6 sqm Perimeter: 68.64m Wall area= 47.08x2.5=117.7 sqm Total GFA of building: 339.3928 sqm ~ 339.39 sqm Wall area= 68.64x2.5=171.6 sqm Wall area: 171.6+117.7=289.3 sqm Total GFA of building: 339.3928 sqm ~ 339.39 sqm Wall/floor ratio: 289.3/339.39=0.85 Wall area: 171.6+117.7=289.3 sqm Wall/floor ratio: 289.3/339.39=0.85 Pretending that Rowlinson calculation price are based on the optimize plan shape is square. So that, with the similar amount of area, the wall/ floor area ratio is calculated is 0.76 (appendix 2). Pretending that Rowlinson calculation price are based on the optimize plan shape is square. So that, with the similar amount of area, the wall/ floor area ratio is calculated is 0.76 (appendix 2). 2040
12000
4310
1680
2040
20030
III.
1100
10900
1670
Project indicative cost report by superficial method.
Table 3.1 Building cost by superficial method. III. Project indicative cost report by superficial method. Table 3.1 Building cost by superficial method. Area (sqm) Area (sqm) Gross Floor Area 339.39 Cost adjustment for wall to floor ratio 339.39 Gross Floor Area Cost adjustment for measurement external wall (10%) item Cost adjustment for wall to floor ratio Total building cost according to superficial area Cost adjustment for measurement external wall (10%) item method (December 2016) Total building cost according to superficial area Allowance for demolition and site preparation item method (December 2016) Allowance Landscape work assume 60% site area 462 Allowance for demolition and site preparation item Allowance foot path work assume 15% site area 116 Allowance Landscape work assume 60% site area 462 Allowance fence and gate 111 Allowance foot path work assume 15% site area 116 Total building cost include external work (December Allowance fence and gate 111 2016) Total building cost include external work (December ESD allowance (over and above business as usual) item 2016) Design contingency - assume 5% item ESD allowance (over and above business as usual) Contract contingency - assume 5% item Design contingency - assume 5% Professional fees - assume 8% item Contract contingency - assume 5% Authority & Headwork's Charges item Professional fees - assume 8% Risk contingencies - assume 10% item Authority & Headwork's Charges Goods & Services Tax item Risk contingencies - assume 10% Total building cost (December 2016) item Goods & Services Tax Cost Escalation allowance - August 2017 Current Day Total building cost (December 2016) SRQ 762 Cost Planning Assignment 2. Cost Escalation allowance - March 2018 Tender day Cost Escalation allowance - August 2017 Current Day Cost Escalation allowance - December 2018 Cost Escalation allowance - March 2018 Tender day 3 Completion day 3 Total building cost (December 2018) huy luong | Deakin University huy luong | Deakin University
IV.
4310
15210
Cost report
Rate ($/sqm) Rate 1,550.0 ($/sqm) 1,550.0 14.40 14.70 14.40 75.00 14.70 75.00 2.50% 5.00% 2.50% 5.00% 8.00% 5.00% 2.00% 8.00% 10.00% 2.00% 10.00%
Total ($) 526,055 Total ($) 531,232 526,055 584,355 531,232 584,355 584,355 Exclude 584,355 6,653 Exclude 1,698 6,653 8,325 1,698 8,325 601,031 15,026 601,031 30,052 15,026 30,052 48,082 30,052 12,021 48,082 60,103 12,021 Exclude 60,103 796,366 Exclude 815,625 796,366 820,119 815,625 820,119 833,603 833,603
Project cost plan at sketch design stage by element method.
1. Elenment cost plan base on Rawlinsons. Table 4.1 Cost element breaking base on Rowlinson (2016, p. 102) and the drawing analysis (appendix 3) ELEMENT
CODE N.P.W.C
GBA (sqm)
BUILDING AVERAGE COST ($)
PERCENTAGE BUILDING COST (%)
COST OF ELEMENT ($)
ELEMENT QUANTITY
ELEMENT UNIT
ELEMENT UNIT RATE ($)
10.20%
AVERAGE COST OF ELEMENT ($) 158.10
PREMILINARIES
PR
339.39
1,550
53,657.56
1
item
53,657.56
SUBSTRUCTURE
SB
339.39
1,550
8.20%
127.10
43,136.47
192.42
sqm
224.18
SUPERSTRUCTURE
Columns
CL
339.39
1,550
0.00%
-
-
-
sqm
-
Uper floors
UF
339.39
1,550
0.00%
-
-
166.33
sqm
-
Stairs and Ramps
SC
339.39
1,550
0.00%
-
-
5.76
sqm
-
Roof
RF
339.39
1,550
13.90%
215.45
73,121.58
168.04
sqm
435.14
External Walls
EW
339.39
1,550
21.30%
330.15
112,049.61
229.9718
sqm
487.23
Windows
WW
339.39
1,550
0.00%
-
-
18.615
sqm
-
External Doors
ED
339.39
1,550
17.00%
263.50
89,429.27
34.86
sqm
2,565.38
Internal wall and Partitions
NW
339.39
1,550
6.00%
93.00
31,563.27
225.5494
sqm
139.94
Internal Doors
ND
339.39
1,550
2.70%
41.85
14,203.47
24.54
sqm
578.79
Internal Screens
NS
339.39
1,550
0.70%
10.85
3,682.38
0
sqm
-
Building system OFFICE BUILDING ALTERNATIONS BASE BUILDING
Academic Sefaira energey simulation V-lux lighting simulation
Lighting simulation FEATURE DESCRIPTION
SIMULATION EVALUATION
Glass window: transmittance: 78% Glass roof: transmittance: 78%
• • • •
F1 table surface: 41,6 cd/m2 F1 too Dark, high contrast. F2 table surface: 449 cd/m2 F2 too bright.
•
Skylight, windows bring naturaly direct light into the building. Over illuminance near the windows & skylight. nonuniform Lighting distribution.
Ceiling: white paint Reflectance: 0.84 Roughness: 0.03 Specularity: 0.0 Total area: 1,836 sqm Roof glazing area: 90 sqm WRR: 5%. WWR North (A): 70%. WWR East (B): 36%. WWR West (D): 36%. WWR South (C): 0%. No shading.
Wall: white paint Reflectance: 0.84 Roughness: 0.03 Specularity: 0.0
Perception - F1 Luminance - 21 Dec 12h (Clear)
Floor: carpet - grey color Reflectance: 0.65 Roughness: 0.05 Specularity: 0.0
Perception - F2 Luminance - 21 Dec 12h (Clear)
F1 illuminance - 21 Dec Clear sky
No void.
• • F1 09h
F1 12h
F1 16h
F2 illuminance - 21 Jun Overcast sky
OFFICE BUILDING ALTERNATIONS ITERATION 01 - ADD SHADING
FEATURE DESCRIPTION Aims: eliminate direct lighting
SRT 757 ACCUMULATIVE PRESENTATION - HUY LUONG -
SIMULATION EVALUATION Before
F2 09h
F2 12h
F2 16h
21600 6445
2
Vertical shading: white paint Reflectance: 0.84 Roughness: 0.03 Specularity: 0.0 Horizontal shading: white paint Reflectance: 0.84 Roughness: 0.03 Specularity: 0.0
21 Jun 9h
21 Jun 12h
21 Dec 12h
After
Glass roof: transmittance: 78%
21 Jun 9h
21 Jun 12h
21 Dec 12h
• •
Succed eliminate direct lighting. But illuminance is unadequate for most area.
Redesign roof: North, East, West solid. South glazing Shading: East & West: add horizontal shading 1.5 m North: add Horizontal and Vertical shading 2.0 m. Distance between Vertical Shading: 3.0 m
F1 12h Clear sky - Dec @850 mm
SRT 757 ACCUMULATIVE PRESENTATION - HUY LUONG -
21600 6445
F2 12h Clear sky - Dec @850 mm
4
ASSIGNMENT 2 - SEFAIRA
Energy simulation
SRT 757 BUILDING SYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT UNIT CHAIR: MARK LUTHER TRIMESTER 1 2018
STUDENT: HUY LUONG ID: 216006445 FEATURE DESCRIPTION
OFFICE BUILDING ALTERNATIONS BASE BUILDING
• • • • •
Total area: 1,836 sqm Roof glazing area: 90 sqm WRR: 5%. WWR North (A): 70%. WWR East (B): 36%. WWR West (D): 36%. WWR South (C): 0%. No shading.
• •
SIMULATION EVALUATION
HVAC: VAV Return Air Package Glazing U value: 2.40 SHGC: 0.6 Wall: Concrete Block, U vulue 3.6 Floor: Carpet U value: 0.36 Infiltration: Facade area Roof: Metal deck
• •
• • •
ITERATION 1 - DEVELOPE ENVELOPE
Annual energy consumption (EUI): 112 kWh/m2/yr which is over 2030 Challenge: 86 kWh/m2/yr. Retrofit strategy: 1st fix design, 2nd improve envolope, 3rd HVAC system, 4th equipment, 5th renew energy.
• •
Lighting and equipment energy consumption is dominant. • Cooling and Heating load can be reduced by improve building design.
•
•
Add 1.5m shading for 3 sides: East, North & OFFICE South. BUILDING RedesignALTERNATIONS roof.
ITERATION 5 - REDUCE LIGHTING SRT 757 SEFAIRA ASSIGNMENT & EQUIPMENT
•
FEATURE DESCRIPTION
- HUY LUONG -
Change: • equipment power density to 5 W/m2. • light power density to 1.5 W/m2.
•
Except heating load, cooling and EUI have been decreased. Shading reduced cooling load effectively.
All cooling peak load zones have been reduced under 100W/m2, except zone P04 level 1. To improve the isulation, next step attempts to develope envelope properties.
SIMULATION EVALUATION
21600 6445
1
• •
•
Adjust power density as ASHREA •
ITERATION 6 - PV
Reduce power density significantly contributed to total 74% energy reduction. Reduce equipment and lighting density help reduce internal heat gain and then reduce cooling load.
Diminishing euipment and lighting power density reduced 100,000 kWh per year for the building. •
• •
Install 2 solar photovotaic panel PV (4 m2) PV economic type with 14% efficiency
• • • •
source: solar-panel-mounting
Approach to free renewable energy with PV.
SUMMARY
• • • • • •
Shading + roof retrofit. HVAC: PTHP Split system. Reduce Power density. Extend comfort zone.
SRT 757 SEFAIRA ASSIGNMENT
•
All zones of F2 except (P03) are high cooling peak load because by solar gain and low insulation. Reduce peak load is priority.
Roof skylight redesign with fix glazing. Add 1.5m shading for each •
•
Solar heat gain impacts cooling in North, • East, West and Roof surface. So, their insulation property should be improved. Possible solution: add shading, improve • insulation properties.
Using PV is not effective in this case that only reduce 200$ for 1 year.
Step1 - improve envelope design. Step 2 Improve glazing properties. step 3 Change HVAC and Attempt to Natural Ventilation. Step 4: Adjust comfort set point. Step 5: eliminate equipment, lighting energy consumption. Step 6: Approach to renewable enrgy.
- HUY LUONG -
This case assumes that there is no energy storing beterry. Lowest energy consumption: June 3000kWh. So, approximate 100 kWh per day. PV area are choosen base on the lowest energy to ensure PV efficiency. Base on the graph, 4 sqm could generate 112 kWh (14% efficiency panel). But the result shows very limit energy cost reduction.
21600 6445
• • • • •
Progressively, retrofiting approached from architecture design to HVAC sytem and then trying to apply renewable energy. Eventually, the total energy consumption in one year decreses up to 79%. Energy Use Intensity (EUI) was eliminated from 122 kWh/m2/yr down to 24 kWh/m2/yr, beyond the 2030 challenge for Zone 6. Peak cooling load was also reduce under 100 W/m2 for all zones. Successfully improvement.
3
Thes is
Academic
A mp hi b ious A r c hit ec t u re Thesis title:
Abstract:
Proposing a new housing type to cope with seasonal flooding Mekong Delta, Vietnam.
Seasonal flooding manipulates lives and activities in Mekong Delta, Vietnam. Annually, the flooding vigorously inundates the upper delta for months and supplies a vast amount of fluvial sediment. The sediment from flood water fertilizes the soil and contributes much to the local rice production. But flooding also destroys houses, assets and endangers the local inhabitants. In fact, the local dwellers suffered from a disastrous flood in 2000. The extreme flood caused fatalities and loss of accommodation. In 2006, the government started to upgrade the dyke and irrigation system. The aims of the policies were protecting lives and increasing crop production from two to three per annum. However, the later researcher found that the given policy was not sustainable. The research explained that the new dyke system eliminated sediment from the field. In fact, the loss of natural sediment makes the flooding more serious and the local farmers have to use alternative costly artificial fertilizer. The researcher argued that the policy should shift to adaptive strategy which means let the flooding inundate the area and mitigate the flooding negative impacts. Supporting new idea, this thesis develops an amphibious foundation system for the current housing in order to cope with the extreme flooding conditions in the upper Mekong Delta region. The new proposition is based on three themes that were concluded from the literature review and case studies analysis. The three themes are (1) negative impacts of seasonal flooding in the delta, (2) constraint of the current local housing typology, and (3) amphibious housing. Additionally, this thesis also reviews and compares three case studies of amphibious housing with the local housing typology. From the comparison, the essential components of the new proposed foundation system are clearly defined. Final, this thesis suggests guidelines for the defined components of the amphibious foundation system: supporting frame, buoyant blocks and tracking posts.
Finding Floating house
Stilt house
(Luong 2018), boat house in normal stage and flooding stage.
(Luong 2018), stilt house type A in normal stage and flooding stge.
Detach Stilt house
(Luong 2018), stilt house type B in normal stage and ecessive flooding stage.
Guidelines
Supporting frame
(Luong 2018), supporting frame.
Buoyant Blocks
(Luong 2018), buoyant blocks.
Vertical posts
(Luong 2018), vertical posts
(Luong 2018), amphibious foundation system.
Thanks huy.luong.tg@gmail.com 04 0433 0457