Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal The Sociopolitical Paradigm in Financial Accounting Research Ruth D. Hines
Article information: To cite this document: Ruth D. Hines, (1989),"The Sociopolitical Paradigm in Financial Accounting Research", Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 2 Iss 1 pp. Permanent link to this document: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09513578910134671 Downloaded on: 09 November 2015, At: 01:38 (PT) References: this document contains references to 0 other documents. To copy this document: permissions@emeraldinsight.com The fulltext of this document has been downloaded 4372 times since 2006*
Downloaded by UNIVERSITY OF JAFFNA At 01:38 09 November 2015 (PT)
Users who downloaded this article also downloaded: Ruth D. Hines, (1989),"Financial Accounting Knowledge, Conceptual Framework Projects and the Social Construction of the Accounting Profession", Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 2 Iss 2 pp. - http:// dx.doi.org/10.1108/09513578910132268 Jesse F. Dillard, (1991),"Accounting as a Critical Social Science", Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 4 Iss 1 pp. - http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09513579110143849 Ruth Hines, (1991),"On Valuing Nature", Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 4 Iss 3 pp. - http:// dx.doi.org/10.1108/09513579110144802
Access to this document was granted through an Emerald subscription provided by emerald-srm:232805 []
For Authors If you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for Authors service information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines are available for all. Please visit www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information.
About Emerald www.emeraldinsight.com Emerald is a global publisher linking research and practice to the benefit of society. The company manages a portfolio of more than 290 journals and over 2,350 books and book series volumes, as well as providing an extensive range of online products and additional customer resources and services. Emerald is both COUNTER 4 and TRANSFER compliant. The organization is a partner of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and also works with Portico and the LOCKSS initiative for digital archive preservation. *Related content and download information correct at time of download.
Downloaded by UNIVERSITY OF JAFFNA At 01:38 09 November 2015 (PT)
Downloaded by UNIVERSITY OF JAFFNA At 01:38 09 November 2015 (PT)
Downloaded by UNIVERSITY OF JAFFNA At 01:38 09 November 2015 (PT)
Downloaded by UNIVERSITY OF JAFFNA At 01:38 09 November 2015 (PT)
Downloaded by UNIVERSITY OF JAFFNA At 01:38 09 November 2015 (PT)
Downloaded by UNIVERSITY OF JAFFNA At 01:38 09 November 2015 (PT)
Downloaded by UNIVERSITY OF JAFFNA At 01:38 09 November 2015 (PT)
Downloaded by UNIVERSITY OF JAFFNA At 01:38 09 November 2015 (PT)
Downloaded by UNIVERSITY OF JAFFNA At 01:38 09 November 2015 (PT)
Downloaded by UNIVERSITY OF JAFFNA At 01:38 09 November 2015 (PT)
Downloaded by UNIVERSITY OF JAFFNA At 01:38 09 November 2015 (PT)
Downloaded by UNIVERSITY OF JAFFNA At 01:38 09 November 2015 (PT)
Downloaded by UNIVERSITY OF JAFFNA At 01:38 09 November 2015 (PT)
Downloaded by UNIVERSITY OF JAFFNA At 01:38 09 November 2015 (PT)
Downloaded by UNIVERSITY OF JAFFNA At 01:38 09 November 2015 (PT)
Downloaded by UNIVERSITY OF JAFFNA At 01:38 09 November 2015 (PT)
Downloaded by UNIVERSITY OF JAFFNA At 01:38 09 November 2015 (PT)
Downloaded by UNIVERSITY OF JAFFNA At 01:38 09 November 2015 (PT)
Downloaded by UNIVERSITY OF JAFFNA At 01:38 09 November 2015 (PT)
Downloaded by UNIVERSITY OF JAFFNA At 01:38 09 November 2015 (PT)
Downloaded by UNIVERSITY OF JAFFNA At 01:38 09 November 2015 (PT)
Downloaded by UNIVERSITY OF JAFFNA At 01:38 09 November 2015 (PT)
Downloaded by UNIVERSITY OF JAFFNA At 01:38 09 November 2015 (PT)
Downloaded by UNIVERSITY OF JAFFNA At 01:38 09 November 2015 (PT)
Downloaded by UNIVERSITY OF JAFFNA At 01:38 09 November 2015 (PT)
Downloaded by UNIVERSITY OF JAFFNA At 01:38 09 November 2015 (PT)
This article has been cited by: 1. Dwiyani Sudaryanti, Eko G. Sukoharsono, Zaki Baridwan, Aji D. Mulawarman. 2015. Critical Analysis on Accounting Information Based On Pancasila Value. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 172, 533-539. [CrossRef] 2. Karen Boll. 2014. Mapping tax compliance. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 25, 293-303. [CrossRef] 3. Patrizio Monfardini, Antonio D. Barretta, Pasquale Ruggiero. 2013. Seeking legitimacy: Social reporting in the healthcare sector. Accounting Forum 37, 54-66. [CrossRef] 4. Thomas Lagner, Dodozu Knyphausen-Aufseß. 2012. Rating Agencies as Gatekeepers to the Capital Market: Practical Implications of 40 Years of Research. Financial Markets, Institutions & Instruments 21:10.1111/fmii.2012.21.issue-3, 157-202. [CrossRef] 5. Gordon Boyce, Susan Greer, Bill Blair, Cindy Davids. 2012. Expanding the Horizons of Accounting Education: Incorporating Social and Critical Perspectives. Accounting Education 21, 47-74. [CrossRef] 6. Lee D. Parker. 2012. Qualitative management accounting research: Assessing deliverables and relevance. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 23, 54-70. [CrossRef] 7. Adam Steen, Denice Welch, Darcy McCormack. 2011. Conflicting conceptualizations of human resource accounting. Journal of Human Resource Costing & Accounting 15:4, 299-312. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 8. Denis Saint-Martin, Christine Rothmayr Allison. 2011. Rationalism and public policy: Mode of analysis or symbolic politics?. Policy and Society 30, 19-27. [CrossRef] 9. Hanne Nørreklit, Lennart Nørreklit, Falconer Mitchell. 2010. Paradigms and pragmatic constructivism: a reply. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 23:6, 764-773. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 10. Shona L. Russell, Ian Thomson. 2009. Analysing the role of sustainable development indicators in accounting for and constructing a Sustainable Scotland. Accounting Forum 33, 225-244. [CrossRef] 11. Lee D. Parker. 2008. Strategic management and accounting processes: acknowledging gender. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 21:4, 611-631. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 12. Lee D. Parker. 2007. Financial and external reporting research: the broadening corporate governance challenge. Accounting and Business Research 37, 59-61. [CrossRef] 13. Lee D. Parker. 2007. Financial and external reporting research: the broadening corporate governance challenge. Accounting and Business Research 37, 39-54. [CrossRef] 14. C. Richard Baker. 2006. Epistemological objectivity in financial reporting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 19:5, 663-680. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 15. JOANNE M. LYE. 2006. Performance Measurement in the Public Sector: A Clarification and Agenda for Research. Australian Accounting Review 16:10.1111/auar.2006.16.issue-39, 25-33. [CrossRef] 16. Joanne Lye, Hector Perera, Asheq Rahman. 2005. The evolution of accruals‐based Crown (government) financial statements in New Zealand. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 18:6, 784-815. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 17. Chris Molyneaux, Kerry Jacobs. 2005. Waiting for Marxo. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 16, 1059-1066. [CrossRef] 18. Bradley N. Potter. 2005. Accounting as a social and institutional practice: perspectives to enrich our understanding of accounting change. Abacus 41:10.1111/abac.2005.41.issue-3, 265-289. [CrossRef] 19. Peggy D Dwyer, Robin W Roberts. 2004. Known by the company they keep: a study of political campaign contributions made by the United States public accounting profession. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 15, 865-883. [CrossRef] 20. Tomo Suzuki. 2003. The epistemology of macroeconomic reality: The Keynesian Revolution from an accounting point of view. Accounting, Organizations and Society 28, 471-517. [CrossRef] 21. Tomo Suzuki. 2003. The accounting figuration of business statistics as a foundation for the spread of economic ideas. Accounting, Organizations and Society 28, 65-95. [CrossRef] 22. Teri Shearer. 2002. Ethics and accountability: from the for-itself to the for-the-other. Accounting, Organizations and Society 27, 541-573. [CrossRef] 23. Brad Potter. 2002. Financial accounting reforms in the Australian public sector. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 15:1, 69-93. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 24. Natalie BuckmasterCaptured within masculine accounting: Accountability of non-profit organizations 31-44. [Abstract] [Enhanced Abstract] [PDF] [PDF] 25. Susan Greer, Chris Patel. 2000. The issue of Australian indigenous world‐views and accounting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 13:3, 307-329. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 26. David Bailey, George Harte, Roger Sugden. 2000. Corporate disclosure and the deregulation of international investment. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 13:2, 197-218. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
Downloaded by UNIVERSITY OF JAFFNA At 01:38 09 November 2015 (PT)
27. JUDY A. BROWN. 2000. COMPETING IDEOLOGIES IN THE ACCOUNTING AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS ENVIRONMENT. The British Accounting Review 32, 43-75. [CrossRef] 28. Mary Ann Reynolds, M.R. MathewsThe environment and the accountant as ethical actor 83-100. [Abstract] [Enhanced Abstract] [PDF] [PDF] 29. David Coy, Michael Pratt. 1998. An insight into accountability and politics in universities: a case study. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 11:5, 540-561. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 30. Bill Doolin. 1997. A framework for interpreting decision support system use in organisations. Journal of Systems and Information Technology 1:2, 1-22. [Abstract] [PDF] 31. Rob Gray, Colin Dey, Dave Owen, Richard Evans, Simon Zadek. 1997. Struggling with the praxis of social accounting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 10:3, 325-364. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 32. Sonja Gallhofer, Jim Haslam. 1997. The direction of green accounting policy: critical reflections. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 10:2, 148-174. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 33. Theresa Hammond, Prem Sikka. 1996. Radicalizing accounting history: the potential of oral history. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 9:3, 79-97. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 34. Keith Hooper, Michael Pratt. 1995. Discourse and rhetoric. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 8:1, 10-37. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 35. Nicholas C. Mangos, Neil R. Lewis. 1995. A socio‐economic paradigm for analysing managers′ accounting choice behaviour. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 8:1, 38-62. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 36. Joanne Locke, Greg Tower. 1995. A CROSS‐CULTURAL MODEL OF INTERNATIONAL ACCOUNTING COMPATIBILITY. Asian Review of Accounting 3:1, 59-91. [Abstract] [PDF] 37. Timothy J. Fogarty, Mohamed E.A. Hussein, J. Edward Ketz. 1994. Political Aspects of Financial Accounting Standard Setting in the USA. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 7:4, 24-46. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 38. Tom Lee. 1994. Financial Reporting Quality Labels. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 7:2, 30-49. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 39. Timothy J. Fogarty. 1992. Financial accounting standard setting as an institutionalized action field: Constraints, opportunities and dilemmas. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 11, 331-355. [CrossRef] 40. Linda Lewis, Christopher Humphrey, David Owen. 1992. Accounting and the social: A pedagogic perspective. The British Accounting Review 24, 219-233. [CrossRef] 41. Christopher Humphrey, Peter Moizer, Stuart Turley. 1992. The audit expectations gap—plus ca change, plus c'est la meme chose?. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 3, 137-161. [CrossRef] 42. J. Amernic. 1992. A case study in corporate financial reporting: Massey-ferguson's visible accounting decisions 1970–1987. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 3, 1-43. [CrossRef] 43. Linda English, James Guthrie. 1991. PUBLIC SECTOR AUDITING: A CASE OF CONTESTED ACCOUNTABILITY REGIMES. Australian Journal of Public Administration 50, 347-360. [CrossRef] 44. Ann B. Pushkin, David B. Pariser. 1991. Political and economic forces shaping regulatory accounting for troubled debt restructuring. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 2, 127-143. [CrossRef] 45. Kari Lukka. 1990. Ontology and accounting: The concept of profit. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 1, 239-261. [CrossRef] 46. Christopher Humphrey, Peter Moizer. 1990. From techniques to ideologies: An alternative perspective on the audit function. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 1, 217-238. [CrossRef] 47. Marilyn Neimark. 1990. The king is dead. Long live the king!. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 1, 103-114. [CrossRef] 48. Herbert G. Hunt, Raymond L. Hogler. 1990. Corporate ownership and accounting choice: A critical analysis. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 1, 53-67. [CrossRef]