Judges Chapters 6,7,8 Commentary

Page 1

JUDGES Chapters 6-8 Chapter 6 6:1 This book with the repeated expression, “then the sons of Israel did what was evil in the sight of the Lord”, confines the viewpoint that unless we are diligent, we are always only one generation away from apostasy. The Midianites were related to the Hebrews in so much as Midian was the son of Abraham by his second wife Keturah (Genesis 25:1-6). They were a nomadic people who ranged from the southern part of the Sinai peninsula, northward to the gulf of Aqabah and as far as the plains east of Moab. 6:2-5 Rather than permanently settling in the land, the Midianites had adopted a different strategy. They waited until the harvest was ready, then they would move in from the desert, cross the Jordan in huge numbers and overwhelm the land. “With their speedy, wide-ranging mounts (camels), they roamed all the way to Gaza, helping themselves to crops and animals” (Gaebelein p. 417). Then, with their camels fully loaded down, they returned across the Jordan until the next harvest. Verse 5 compares with annual invasion with an locust infestation. “Like a plague of locusts, they would swoop through the land, stripping it bare of grain, vegetables, fruit, and livestock. Finally, their camels loaded down with their spoil, they would cross back into the desert and live there until the next harvest time. Perhaps they would leave a small force in the land, but the main host came only during the yearly invasion” (Inrig p. 87). None of this should have surprised of Israelites, for the Law made it clear that covenant-breakers could expect precisely this type of treatment (Deuteronomy 28:38,31). The unfaithful Israelites found themselves captives in their own land, and out of desperation tried living in mountain dens, and caves.


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.
Judges Chapters 6,7,8 Commentary by Mark Dunagan - Issuu