HOME WORK
CARLOS GONZALES . BRANDON ROGERS . COMPREHENSIVE STUDIO . SPRING 2014 A facility in Greenville, SC breaks down the border between home and work and integrates the two into one convenient, enjoyable and sustainable way of life for start-up entrepreneurs
1
CONTENT
Contact information:
Name: Carlos Gonzalez Aguilar Email: kausa28@gmail.com carlosg@clemson.edu Tel: 864-650-2352 Address: 103 University Village Dr, Apart. 119C,Central, SC 29630
Name: Colonel Brandon Rogers Email: coloner@clemson.edu brogers@catalystarch.com Tel: 803-603-6370 Address: 4619 Clemson Avenue Columbia, SC 29206
HOME + WORK: The Office Pod is a unique configuration that integrates home and work in a holistic approach. This portfolio contains a thorough description of the project. The final design assignment to graduate at the School of Architecture in Clemson University, the comprehensive studio, Arch 892, embraces technical resolution, conceptualization, aesthetics, function, life safety and sustainability.
4
CONCEPT
8
SITE PLANNING & FLOOR PLANS
14
ELEVATIONS & SECTIONS
22
LIFE SAFETY
24
SUSTAINABILITY
28
STRUCTURAL SYSTEM
34
MECHANICAL SYSTEM
proximity, segregation and integration
Color Identity Address System
of functions allowing the different spaces to have their unique characteristics and activities. It is aimed for the entrepreneurial person who needs to work from home and still have a presence for clients, investors and other business people; and also balancing family life and personal living. Proximity
Segregation
Integration
UNIQUE OFFICE CONFIGURATION.
•
STRONG IDENTITY AND POSITIONING.
•
RICH DIVERSITY OF INTERACTIONS AND POSSIBILITIES
•
PRIVATE OFFICES AND COMMON SPACES
•
CENTRAL COLLABORATION AND SOCIAL AREAS
•
COMBINATION OF OFFICE POD AS NARRATIVE, NODAL CLUSTERS AND NEIGHBORHOODS.
CONCEPT
4
PROXIMITY
•
PROJECT’S APPROACH
THE OFFICE POD
Office configuration • Physical Segregation • Communal spaces • Proximity Entrepreneur Thinking • Collaboration • Empowerment • Efficiency • Privacy Dwelling configuration • Security • Community • Sustainability
INTEGRATION SEGREGATION
It is an initiative that wants to break down the border between home and work integrating them into one single enjoyable, sustainable and convenient facility. The proposal is based on
? Remote Blank box Networking Collaboration Single Multiple Communal location OFFICE CONFIGURATION DIAGRAMS
Adjacent Intersect Enclosure Separation Single 5
Multiple
Communal Segregation
OFFICE & HOME CONFIGURATION DIAGRAMS
UP
DW
DW
The “office pod” becomes this space of mediation and integration between the “blank box” and the neighborly configuration, allowing for small scale interactions and collaboration; offering proximity to the dwelling units and convenience. Integrating office space and home is the ultimate goal of this proposal
DW
COMMUNAL WORK AREA
.
TYPICAL OFFICE
UP
KITCHENETTE, RESTROOMS
TYPICAL OFFICE .
.
.
OFFICE POD THIRD LEVEL
OFFICE POD FOURTH LEVEL
OFFICE POD SECOND LEVEL CONFERENCE ROOM
RECEPTION SPACE 1/ POD
KITCHENETTE PRIVATE & RESTROOMS OFFICE SPACE 1/ POD 40 UNITS
1 UP
MECHANICAL ROOM
2
RECEPTION
3
OFFICE POD GROUND LEVEL
4
Central collaboration and social area OFFICE POD’S DISTRIBUTION
6
OFFICE POD TYPICAL PLANS
7
PERSPECTIVE SECTION VIEW THROUGH OFFICE POD
? Office Residence Circulation Connector Parking Wedge Landscape MASS TRANSFORMATION DIAGRAMS At just five minutes walk from downtown Greenville, and taking advantage of its current development and growth, Home + Work is a strategically located facility that conveniently offers the chance to catapult ideas, businesses and any innovative venture into the heart of this city, nearby areas, or far beyond.
Clients
SITE PLANNING
8
Residence CIRCULATION DIAGRAM
9
MAIN ENTRANCE
10
11
GROUND LEVEL
PLANS & ELEVATIONS
12
SECOND LEVEL
NORTH ELEVATION
THIRD LEVEL
13
FOURTH LEVEL
SOUTH ELEVATION
The “office pod” becomes this space of mediation and integration between the “blank box” and the neighborly configuration, allowing for small scale interactions and collaboration; offering proximity to the dwelling units and convenience. Integrating office space and home is the ultimate goal of this proposal
14
WEST ELEVATION
15
EAST ELEVATION
SECTION A
SECTION B 16
17
COLLABORATION & SOCIAL AREA
18
TYPICAL 2-BED APARTMENT
19
HOME WORK A unique solution that encourage entrepreneurs in their ventures. A Think-tank for the creation of ideas, solutions and innovation. The Office Pod embodies the characteristics of an incubator, a functional and convenient solution for the residents, and a new typology for the users.
20
21
6' - 8"
EGRESS SYSTEM:
K
ENCLOSED EXIT STAIRWAY & ELEVATOR
J
APARTMENT
.
G
.
7' - 0"
A
.
5' - 5"
.
CRITICAL TRAVEL DISTANCE:
B
C
F
.
1. EXIT ACCESS: • CORRIDORS • EGRESS BALCONIES 2. THE EXIT 3. EXIT DISCHARGE
DN
155’ -0”
.
D 3' - 8"
EXTERIOR EXIT ACCESS: 10 9
11
8
12
7
13
6
14
5
15
4
16
3
17
2
18
1
19 DN
FIRE-RESISTANCE RATED ENCLOSURE WALLS
S N
FIRE-RESISTANCE RATED DOOR MINIMUM WIDTH 32”
WIDTH OF STAIR : 44”
.
P
APARTMENTS 139 OCCUPANTS 3' - 0"
•
EXIT DISCHARGE
Residential occupancy 27800 sqf / 200 sqf /occupant OFFICES 132 OCCUPANTS
LIFE SAFETY
EXIT PATH
8' - 6"
22
EGRESS SYSTEM DIAGRAM
EXIT STAIRWAY DESIGN
R
Q 0
3' - 8"
L .
.
UP
OVERALL MINIMUM INSIDE LENGTH OF STAIR ENCLOSURE: 15’-7”
M
.
20' - 2"
FLOOR TO FLOOR HEIGHT: 11’-0”
•
O .
EXIT ACCESS EGRESS BALCONY
EXIT STAIRWAY DESIGN TWO-FLIGHT STAIR: •
Z''
.
THROUGH EGRESS BALCONIES INTERIOR WALL 1/2 HOUR FIRE RATED
1' - 0"
• •
E
Business areas 13200 sqf / 100 sqf /occupant
10
20
30
TYPICAL LIFE SAFETY PLAN
• • • • • •
PATH OF EGRESS: 125’ SPRINKLER SYSTEM DOOR WIDTHS: 32” CORRIDOR WIDTH: 36” STAIRS WIDTH: 36” 10 OCCUPANTS / SINGLE EXIT
• • • • • •
PATH OF EGRESS: 75’ SPRINKLER SYSTEM DOOR WIDTHS: 32” CORRIDOR WIDTH: 36” STAIRS WIDTH: 36” 49 OCCUPANTS / SINGLE EXIT
PV MODULES CONFIGURATION:
EQUINOX
SUMMER SOLSTICE JUNE 21st
FACING SOUTH TILT = LATITUDE (35º) FIXED POSITION
12’-10
”
6’-
7”
• • •
WINTER SOLSTICE DECEMBER 21st
AVERAGE DAILY SOLAR RADIATION PER MONTH 4 to 5 KWh / m² / day UTILITY INTERACTIVE SYSTEM: • • • •
DOES NOT NEED BATTERIES RELIABLE DECENTRALIZATION OF ENERGY PRODUCTION MAY GENERATE INCOME
PANEL SIZE: • 84.42 sqf CELL TYPE: • SINGLE-CRYSTAL SILICON • MOST EXPENSIVE • MOST EFFICIENT • NEED STRONG FRAMING
OVERHANG PROTECTION
APARTMENTS 275 350 W AC CONNECTED
OFFICES 104 190 W AC CONNECTED
ROUGH ESTIMATION OF PV SIZE • 4255ft² of SURFACE •
35º
CROSS VENTILATION
51 SOLAR PANELS
COMMON SP. 38 295 W AC CONNECTED SOURCE: ARCH 873. Environmental Systems. Lecture 20: Photovoltaics
SUSTAINABILITY
24
PHOTO-VOLTAIC PANELS ON ROOF
25
PHOTO-VOLTAIC PANEL DESCRIPTION
SOLAR COLLECTOR CONFIGURATION: • • • •
FACING SOUTH TILT = LATITUDE (35º) FIXED POSITION ACTIVE SOLAR STRATEGY
Initial cost $937k*
Energy consumed 38,370kW
Energy cost $0.12
DRAIN BACK SOLAR HOT WATER SYSTEM HEAT EXCHANGER TO PREVENT CONTAMINATION OF DOMESTIC HOT WATER
Money saved $7,721 avg/month**
Payback period 9 yrs
25 yr Utility Savings $2.31M
Water consumed 263,536 gal/yr****
Initial cost $7,400***
*After State, Federal and Utility Company credit. **Assuming 25 yr life span of system
***Including tank and rainwater pump station
SOURCE: http://www.solar-estimate.org/
week for lawn watering ( rain sensors)
Money saved $790/year
Payback period 9 yrs
****Assuming 5 flushes per day for toilets ( low flow) and 3 cycles of 60 minutes a
COST/ BENEFIT ANALYSIS
RAINWATER COLLECTION • Roof area: 19,535ft² • Average annual precipitation: 50.77in
Internal rate of return
11.5%
APPROXIMATE SIZING OF SOLAR COLLECTORS Domestic water
Water cost $0.015/5 gal
2 beds / 2 baths 335 ft² 675 ft3 Considering 4 people 1 bed / 1 bath 760 ft² 152 ft3 Considering 2 people
ROUGH ESTIMATION • 1495 ft² of PANEL SURFACE • • •
18 PANELS 907 ft3 TANK SIZE 6 785 gal
Studio 400 ft² 80 ft3
26
Solar Panels Solar Collectors PV PANELS & SOLAR COLLECTORS GRID ON ROOF
27
27
0"
EASY TO ASSEMBLE
'-
'-
12 6"
10
EXPEDITED CONSTRUCTION PROCESS LESS WASTE GENERATED ON-SITE
18
'-
6"
COMPARABLE PERFORMANCE WITH CONCRETE AND STEEL 22' - 0"
SUSTAINABLE PRODUCT WITH LOWER CARBON FOOTPRINT
21' - 0"
CROSSLAMINATED TIMBER
COST-SAVING BENEFITS
0"
10' - 0"
LOWER NON-RENEWABLE ENERGY CONSUMPTION 18' - 6"
MATERIAL RECYCLING & REUSE
CONCRETE
CLT
+26%
+57%
1
EMBODIED ENERGY
+34%
+81%
1
GREENHOUSE GAS EMITTED
+24%
+47%
1
AIR POLLUTION RELEASED
OF CROSS-LAMINATED TIMBER CONSTRUCTION
LESS NEED FOR HIGH-SKILLED CONSTRUCTION LABOR ON-SITE
HIGH STRUCTURAL STABILITY
30' - 0" 22' -
COMPUTER CONTROLLED MACHINERY ENSURES HIGH QUALITY
DIMENSIONAL STABILITY ALLOWS FOR PRE-INSTALLATION OF PLUMBING & ELECTRICAL
19' - 0"
12' - 6"
CREATED IN FABRICATION PLANTS
GOOD FIRE PERFORMANCE RATINGS
STEEL
Canadian Wood Council, 2005. Wood Design Manual.
CROSS LAMINATED TIMBER
STRUCTURAL ASSEMBLY
SHEAR ELEMENTS
STRUCTURAL PLAN UPPER LEVELS
CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE
3/64” = 1’-0”
1. 5-PLY CLT ROOF PANELS 1
1
2. 5- PLY CLT FLOOR PANELS MAX SPAN OF 25’
3. C.I.P CONCRETE STAIR SHAFT 4
4
4
8” REINFORECED CONCRETE WALLS
4
4. 5-PLY CLT WALL PANELS 10’ TALL AND VARYING LENGTH
7
8
5. REINFORCED CONCRETE WALLS
2
2
CAST IN PLACE - 14’ TALL
6. DIAGONAL CABLE BRACING 5 7
6
3 3
7. 3-PLY CLT FLOOR PANELS
5
MAX SPAN OF 12’
3
12
9
9 8
3
7
8
STRUCTURAL PLAN FIRST LEVEL 0 0"
10
20
30
3/64” = 1’-0”
10
'-
'-
12
6
5
6"
10
11
12 18
'-
6"
STRUCTURAL SYSTEM 22' - 0"
21' - 0"
28
9
10
7 5
10 11
BUILDING 2 6
5
11
8. HEAVY TIMBER COLUMNS 9” x 9” BRACED EVERY 11’
9. GLULAM BEAMS
SUPPORTING CLT FLOOR PANELS
10. TWO-WAY CONCRETE SLAB MAX SPAN OF 25’
12
6
29
BUILDING 1
11. FIRST FLOOR SLAB ON GRADE INFILL DIRT FOR RAISED AREAS
12 REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAMS
30
30
31
PLATFORM FRAME CONSTRUCTION CREATE A HIGHLY IRREGULAR BUILDING FORM
ALLOW FOR CHANGES IN THE BUILDING OVER TIME PERMIT CONSTRUCTION UNDER ADVERSE WEATHER CONDITIONS MINIMIZE THE DEAD LOAD ON A FOUNDATION MINIMIZE STRUCTURAL DISTRESS DUE TO UNSTABLE FOUNDATION CONDITIONS PROVIDE CONCEALED SPACES FOR DUCTS, PIPES, ETC. SOLID CLT PANELS PROVIDE SHEAR RESISTANCE BETWEEN APARTMENTS. Allen, Edward, and Joseph Iano. The Architect’s Studio Companion: Rules of Thumb for Preliminary Design. New York: Wiley, 2012. Print.
OFFICE POD ASSEMBLY
LOAD TRACING DIAGRAM CABLE-BRACED FRAME
OFFICES
STRUCTURAL SYSTEM
32
PERIMETER STABILIZING ELEMENTS
HEAVY TIMBER FRAME
SHEAR WALL CONSTRUCTION
PERIMETER SHEAR SHAFTS & INTERIOR SHEAR WALLS
PLATFORM FRAMED
APARTMENTS
33
Allen, Edward, and Joseph Iano. The Architect’s Studio Companion: Rules of Thumb for Preliminary Design. New York: Wiley, 2012. Print.
BUILDING 1
SCHEMATIC DUCTWORK LAYOUT
SUPPLY DIFFUSER AIR TERMINAL
VAV TERMINAL WITH THERMOSTAT
RETURN GRILLE AIR TERMINAL
RETURN DUCTWORK
CONTROL PANEL FOR TEMPERATURE AND VENTILATION
ROOF LEVEL
BUILDING 2
4TH LEVEL
SUPPLY AIR DUCTWORK
CENTRAL ALL-AIR SYSTEM ROOF LEVEL
CONTROL PANEL FOR TEMPERATURE AND VENTILATION
OFFICE POD - HVAC SYSTEM VAV TERMINAL WITH THERMOSTAT
RETURN GRILLE AIR TERMINAL
SINGLE DUCT, VARIABLE AIR VOLUME
VAV SINGLE DUCT, CONSTANT AIR VOLUME CAV
3RD LEVEL
3RD LEVEL
SINGLE-PACKAGED HEATING AND COOLING EQUIPMENT LOCATED ON ROOF AND SIZED ACCORDING TO SQUARE FOOTAGE
2ND LEVEL 2ND LEVEL
LENGTH: 10’-10” WIDTH: 7’-3” HEIGHT: 4’-11”
MECHANICAL
1ST LEVEL
1ST LEVEL
34
RETURN DUCTWORK
SUPPLY AIR DUCTWORK
APARTMENT UNIT - HVAC SYSTEM
THE WEDGE
36
37
HOME WORK
38
39