Union Right of Entry Union right of entry has been a highly sensitive issue of recent weeks and in this context, it behoves us to clarify the situation for the benefit of members.
Edition 6-2010 Master Builders Executive Council President – Ross Barrett Treasurer – Simon Butt Chair, Commercial Builders’ Sector Council – Valdis Luks Chair, Suppliers and Subcontractors’ Sector Council – Grace Ferreira Chair, Residential Builders’ Sector Council – David Howarth Chair, Civil Contractors’ Sector Council – David Jones Chair, Professional Consultants’ Sector Council – Hans Sommer Master Builders Management team Executive Director – John Miller Deputy Executive Director – Jerry Howard Director Industrial Relations – Mike Baldwin Senior Management Accountant – Louise MacCallum Senior Manager - Marketing & Membership Services – David Leitch Master Builders Group Training General Manager – Wendy Tengstrom
The right of entry provisions in the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (the Act) are similar to the provisions in the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth). The point of difference is, that right of entry is now linked to the right of the union to represent the industrial interests of the relevant employees, rather than coverage by an instrument such as an award or enterprise agreement.
When does a union have right of entry? Under the Act a union official who holds an Entry Permit may enter an employer’s premises without notice to: 1. Investigate a suspected breach of the Act or industrial instrument (award or enterprise agreement); 2. Hold discussions with employees; and 3. Exercise a state/ territory OH&S right.
Right of Entry obligations There are a number of conditions that the Act imposes upon unions who seek to enter the workplace or site including: a) That official must hold a valid right of entry permit issued by FWA; b) The permit holder must give at least 24 hours notice before entering and entry can only occur during working hours c) The permit holder must set out the basis on which they have entry rights. This essentially means that they are simply required to show their permit upon request. Be advised that the union official is not required to tell you what they wish to discuss with employees, with the discussion often varying between training, superannuation, enterprise bargaining, employee entitlements, health and safety etc. Further, the venue for these discussions ought to be appropriate, that is, not at the back of the site next to the thunderbox!
Access to employee records
Master Builders Association of the ACT 1 Iron Knob St, Fyshwick ACT 2609 PO Box 1211, Fyshwick ACT 2609 Tel: (02) 6247 2099 Fax: (02) 6249 8374 Email: canberra@mba.org.au Web: www.mba.org.au
Recently we have had several requests by unions for employee records. This is a reasonable request where those records are relevant to a suspected breach of the law being investigated. What is not allowed is access by unions of non-member records unless that non-member gives written consent, or if Fair Work Australia
agrees that access to records is necessary to investigate the breach. There are protections against misuse of information obtained by a union in the course of investigating suspected breaches. In particular a person cannot disclose information obtained under the right of entry for a purpose other than rectifying the alleged breach or in specific limited circumstances where there is a public interest in the information being disclosed (eg a major safety or health issue). Controls of the use of information contained in the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) also apply to any personal information collected during investigations.
Right of Entry under the Work Safety Act 2008 (ACT) When confronted with union entry at the workplace, members must clearly understand the distinction between their obligations under the Work Safety Act 2008 (ACT) and the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth). The right of entry provisions detailed above do not apply when a union official seeks to enter the site on the basis of a potential safety breach. If it there is an OH&S issue on site, it is not a right of entry question. In accordance with the Work Safety Act 2008 (ACT) permit holders have right of access and should not be unduly delayed in achieving it. Members are entitled to fully understand the OH&S issue in play, but, ordinarily access is to be given. Put more simply, when a union official wishes to enter a site when he suspects on reasonable grounds a contravention of the Act, regardless of its veracity, that official must be let on. This is to be done without prevarication. Once on site, our advice is that he to be escorted everywhere to assist in the identification of the alleged hazard(s) and to ensure that safety is the primary reason for the site visit. That said, it is not a requirement of the Act that he be escorted. Unfortunately we also have seen examples of members ringing the police to remove officials. This is not an appropriate response as all it does is escalate the matter unnecessarily and may result in the member being prosecuted for breach of the Act as it relates to the rights of permit holders. If a union official seeks to enter your site, your first port of call should be to the Master Builders to seek the appropriate advice. Mike Baldwin Director Industrial Relations
DRAFT VARIATIONS TO THE TERRITORY PLAN Nos. 301 AND 303 Code Review Reference Group The Master Builders made representation to the Chief Minister regarding issues raised by members regarding the above Draft Variations to the Territory Plan. In response to these concerns, the Minister for Planning, Andrew Barr MLA, has established a reference group named the 2010 Code Review Reference Group, to be chaired by the Chief Planning Executive. This group will be comprised of industry representatives, professional organisations and community representatives. This group will assist ACTPLA to consider issues raised in public discussion and submissions regarding the draft variations to the Territory Plan Nos. 301 and 303. The first meeting of the reference group was convened on the 12th October. As part of a rolling program of reviewing Territory Plan policy content following the introduction of the new Development Assessment Forum (DAF) Leading Practice format Territory Plan in 2008, the Government intends that these draft variations seek to ensure Canberra’s future growth is socially, economically and environmentally sustainable. The reference group’s main tasks will be to: • consider the issues raised in the submissions, including those of the organisations and individuals represented on the group, that have been received in response to the consultation on the two draft variations; • seek to provide a consensus position on issues to ensure the proposed changes are practical and workable and deliver the desired outcomes; • develop recommendations for consideration
by the ACT Planning and Land Authority and the Minister for Planning. It is not the role of the reference group to negotiate Government policy, but rather the workability of its application through the Territory Plan to achieve a range of objectives that in some circumstances are not easy to reconcile. The members of the reference group have the without prejudice right to make future submissions on the next stage of work released for public comment. Issues with RZ2: There has been a lot of media attention recently specifically related to RZ2 development surrounding local centres. The local residents seem to be confused as to the intent or the objectives for development in this zone. There are also issues with density and specifically some recent ACAT decisions, which now seem to drive the agenda as to what is and what is not allowed in this zone. There have also been issues expressed regarding the quality of some of these developments and, at the same time, we all acknowledge that there is a chronic shortage of housing and there is demand for residential lowdensity living close to local centres and transport routes. There are challenges for the ACT Government, ACTPLA and the industry to work with residence groups to ensure that this type of development will continue with certainty for all. Jerry Howard Deputy Executive Director
ACTPLA Report on Quality of Building Work in the ACT The report on the quality of building work has now been prepared by ACTPLA and has been presented for distribution to members of the Legislative Assembly. It is likely that the report will be tabled in the Assembly in the October sittings. The recommendations in this report have been developed after intensive consultation between July 2010 and September 2010 with building owners, industry and associated professions. The productive nature of the engagement of all parties has facilitated the development of this report to the ACT Legislative Assembly. The goodwill and cooperative spirit of all participants has greatly assisted in completing this detailed report within the timeframe set by the Assembly. Reform of construction industry regulation is a complex project which cannot be completed over a few months. However, work over the consultation period has identified a clear set of challenges, directions and reforms that can be pursued by the industry, regulators and building owners over the remainder of
this year. The goal of the work to be completed in the short term is to bring substance and form to the ideas and suggestions that have evolved from the Building Quality Forum and its subsequent working groups. Increasing regulatory involvement needs to be supported by an industry-wide commitment to higher standards of work and to quality training and education. The regulatory system is not intended to compensate for a lack of skills, knowledge and experience. Discussions with industry representatives have shown that there are many effective quality control mechanisms already employed by some practitioners that can be adopted across the whole industry. The construction sector needs to refocus and commit to improving the skills of potential, new and existing workers to ensure quality is an inherent character of the product the industry provides. Owners’ corporations must also take appropriate and timely action to address problems.
Some common themes that keep recurring throughout this report include:
also be targeted at specific training relating to identified common defects that keep recurring in the industry.
Industry skills and training
The role of Building Certifiers: Many consumers have a low awareness about the role of Building Certifiers and how they are appointed. The expansion of ACTPLA’s e-development platform, to include building processes, will go some way to address this issue, as the system will track building approvals and copies of all project correspondence will be provided to the owner. Under a new proposal, owners will have to engage a Building Certifier before engaging a Builder. The Forum also recommended mandatory stage inspections for Class 2 buildings.
Licenced builders: It was acknowledged in the report that some specific licence areas require specific handson skills and other licence areas require more project management skills. The lower tier of licensing generally associates more with practical building qualifications, however, the quality of work issue appears to be associated primarily with medium-rise developments and the Forum has acknowledged that more needs to be done to ensure that builders in this specific area have the skills and knowledge to adequately supervise and understand the complexities of these types of projects. Sub-trades: The ACT primarily licences the principal contractors and does not licence each individual trade. It is also not common practice for builders to insist on a particular qualification or experience when engaging sub-trades. There is also a national view that sub-contractors entering contracts with clients should be licenced, as is currently the case in some states. Industry representatives on the working group believe that professional builders could raise the minimum level of qualifications by requiring trade certificates, or other completed qualifications, from individuals before they are employed or contracted. Design professionals: Many defects can be prevented by good quality design and the accountability of design professionals for poor work or specifications, needs to be improved. Detailed documentation can also assist owners and regulators with determining where the source of any subsequent problem may be, for either BCA-related issues or an unsuitably specified product. Building designers and quality surveyors in the ACT have previously approached ACTPLA about their potential for inclusion under COLA. These occupations, apart from architects, are currently not licenced or registered in the ACT. Continuing professional development: Most of the working groups raised the issue of continuing professional development and specifically targeted professional development training. There were some specific views expressed at the Forum that builders should be required to undertake targeted professional development training as part of their builders’ licence renewal. This professional development training could
Effective onsite supervision: Effective supervision covers the entire building process from interpreting documentation to onsite supervision. This is considered to be one of the most critical elements of the building process and future work with industry will be undertaken to determine the parameters for jobs that would require a full-time onsite supervisor. The Forum also agreed there should be a minimum Certificate IV level of competence required for a person to supervise construction work.
Insurance The Insurance Working Group members discussed a range of possible solutions for insurance gap for Class 2 buildings in particular, including establishing a Building Defects Fund and extending residential building insurance. A continuing commitment by government and the participants in the Building Quality Forum processes will enable this important work to be completed to the benefit of the community and the industry. The Master Builders are generally satisfied with the recommendations contained in the Building Quality Report and are of the view that the majority of the recommendations are achievable, with the acknowledgement that some are more complex than others and require a legislative change. The Master Builders would also like to express its gratitude to those members who provided input and attended the Forum Sub-Group meetings. Jerry Howard Deputy Executive Director
BUILDERS - get your act together OR RISK A MINIMUM $2000 FINE! The Master Builders Association of the ACT, working with Blackett Homes, hosted a barbecue and presentation by WorkSafe ACT on 5th October. The onsite session at Casey was well attended by residential builders, safety managers and representatives from the regulatory agencies. The attendees were addressed by WorkSafe Commissioner, Mr McCabe, David Howarth, principal of Blackett Homes and Jerry Howard from the Master Builders. Mr McCabe advised that ACT Work Safety now receive extra funding from Government to provide for more inspectors ‘on the beat’, WorkSafe Act will be placing a stronger emphasis on education than has previously been the case and is looking to work with industry partners, such as Blackett Homes and the Master Builders, to improve health and safety outcomes across the ACT. Mr McCabe emphasised that WorkSafe has identified residential housing as an area that requires more focus to ensure that workplaces in that sector are complying with the law and taking all reasonably practicable steps to protect construction workers from the risks associated with this work. WorkSafe ACT advises that we can expect to see more inspectors in the field in this sector with immediate effect. Mr McCabe advised that WorkSafe ACT inspectors, while concerned about any instances of non-compliance, will be focusing, in particular, on five key aspects of health and safety compliance in the sector over coming months: • fall protection • provision of amenities [e.g. toilets] • fencing of sites • site housekeeping • Construction Induction cards WorkSafe ACT will add advisory material to its website setting out its expectations for compliance with the above. WorkCover’s website and the Work Safety
Commissioner’s site, will be redesigned to provide easier access to the information stakeholders are looking for to help them meet their safety obligations. All three presenters emphasised the importance of providing adequate fall protection and complying with the new Work Safety National Code of Practice for the Prevention of Falls in Housing, which came into effect on the 1st October 2010. Fall Protection: Falls from heights are the main contributor to serious accidents and fatalities on construction sites and the lack of compliance in this area will attract specific attention. On the spot infringement notices will be issued for non-compliance and this can equate to a minimum fine of $3000. Provision of amenities and site housekeeping: The provision of amenities and site housekeeping were also emphasised as being major areas of concern in residential construction. Several sites are not provided with adequate amenities and rubbish is allowed to accumulate onsite. Failure to provide toilets and other site amenities such as first-aid will now result in an on the spot fine of $2000. Fencing of sites: The person in control of the work site must ensure that persons are prevented from entering the work site unless authorised to do so. Work sites can be extremely dangerous areas where children can gain access and risk serious injury. It is therefore critical that sites are secured if there is a risk that persons gaining access to that site could be subject to onsite hazards. Construction Induction cards: The person in control of the workplace must ensure that all persons working on the site have undertaken OHS Induction and can provide OHS Induction cards if requested. There is a $2000 on the spot fine for not complying with this requirement. Safety is the responsibility of all, including those working on the site and those in control of the workplace. We call on our member builders to act like true professional Master Builders by complying with the laws that are applicable to them and lead by example. The Master Builders thanks David Howarth from Blackett Homes for making the site available and Mark McCabe and officers from WorkSafe ACT for making this onsite event a great success. Jerry Howard Deputy Executive Director
Shakeup for ACT feedin tariff scheme The ACT Government has announced major changes to the Territory’s solar feed-in tariff scheme. The Government is overhauling its solar energy policies, scrapping its previous plan to directly fund a solar energy farm and expanding its feed-in tariff to pay businesses and larger-scale generators to produce renewable energy. The expansion will happen in two stages. The Government will first open the scheme to medium scale generators. Office blocks and shopping centres with panels on their roofs will be able to take advantage of the scheme. In the second stage, the Government will open-up the scheme to commercial large scale generators. ACT Energy Minister Simon Corbell said the new arrangements would provide the incentive for at least one large scale generator to set up in the ACT. The increased feed-in tariff scheme plan would see: • An overall scheme cap of 240 MW of generating capacity; • Large scale generation category for generators larger than 200 KW (category cap of 210 MW); • Medium scale generation category for generators between 30KW and 200kw (category cap of 15 MW); and, • Existing micro generation category (household rooftop) up to 30KW (category cap of 15 MW). Mr Corbell said the expanded feed-in tariff will open the door to a boost in the construction of large scale solar farm projects in the ACT and allow for increased community investment in renewable energy. “The expansion of the scheme will occur in two steps, with medium scale generation suitable for larger areas such as shopping centres, warehouses and large office buildings, to occur first through amendments to the existing Electricity Feed-In (Renewable Energy Premium) Act 2008,” Mr Corbell said. “The second step will involve the introduction of separate legislation for large scale generation with provision of premium payments to be allocated through an auction process.”
Mr Corbell said the Government would also amend the legislation to allow for community owned renewable energy generators access to the feed-in tariff scheme. “This amendment will assist people who have not been able to utilise the scheme previously due to shared property ownership or poor solar access,” Mr Corbell said. “This approach has been taken following feedback received from industry during the solar facility process which indicated a strong preference for access to a feedin tariff as an alternative to a one off capital payment.” The ACT Government will undertake further consultation with industry and key stakeholders about the administration process for the first auction, he said. The overhaul means the Government will no longer spend $30 million on developing a single solar farm in the ACT. Instead, the Government will conduct an auction to see which large scale company will get the right to generate energy first. Mr Corbell said that should happen in early 2011 and the Government will then make a decision about future auctions. He said the new scheme could see several farms spring up in the Territory. “This will provide for many megawatts of renewable energy generation to be deployed here in Canberra,” he said. “It allows us to develop at least our first solar farm for the city and will create many hundreds of jobs and significant economic activity.” Mr Corbell also said Kowen Forest had been ruled out as a possible location for a future solar facility. A site at Ingledene remains available, he said. ACT Greens Leader Meredith Hunter says the program will provide a good incentive to business and encourage it to establish more solar farms in the Territory. The ACT Opposition Leader Zed Seselja said the overhaul, saying it is condemning consumers to endless electricity price hikes.
Consultations on Canberra’s long-term plan The ACT Government has announced a series of public consultations about long term plans for Canberra – in 2030. The Government said “Canberra 2030 - Time to Talk” will be an “in-depth conversation with the Canberra community about the kind of city we want to live in by 2030.” Consultations will seek to involve as many Canberrans as possible, using an array of consultation methods ranging from seminars and surveys to online blogs and other forms of social media. “The focus of the conversation will be on urban form in all its facets - population, sustainable transport, addressing climate change, housing, planning and open space - and the challenges we will collectively confront as we build a better city for the future,” Chief Minister Jon Stanhope said today. “And we are serious about engaging as many Canberrans as possible in this ambitious conversation.” Discussions will focus on 10 themes - Population, Water, Canberra Homes, Getting Around, Land Use and Planning, Liveability and Wellbeing, City Form, Environmental Sustainability, Living in the Nation’s
Private Bushfire Shelters On 22 September 2010, Master Builders made a submission to the Australian Building Codes Board (ABCB) on their Consultation Regulatory Impact Statement 2010-03 (RIS) with regard to the Proposal to amend the Building Code of Australia (BCA) requirements for private bushfire shelters. Master Builders appreciates that shelters are currently being built in an unregulated market, with little quality control. Master Builders therefore supports the ABCB proposal where the decision to build such a shelter is a voluntary one, but the construction must comply with the Performance Requirement that will be provided in the BCA. As the RIS points out, there is no positive case for any sort of mandatory approach at this time. However, we have some serious reservations about the introduction of such shelters at this time. The level of uncertainty associated with the performance parameters needed, the lack of any means to replicate the effects of a bushfire to test the effectiveness of designs of private bushfire shelters, the apparent lack of even a testing protocol for verification of meeting the required Performance Requirements, the performance of shelters in reality, the quality of maintenance and human factors involved are of concern. Maintenance of tenable conditions and ensuring a lack of oxygen deprivation must be able to be demonstrated. Ongoing monitoring and enforcement mechanisms will be needed to ensure long-term fitness-for-purpose of such shelters. This is not generally the role of the BCA and is generally a state and territory or local government administrative matter. Master Builders does not believe that private bushfire shelters should be allowed to be built without the monitoring and enforcement issue being addressed and enacted. Some means of ensuring this continues after sale of the house needs to be included in the regime.
Capital, and the ultimate question: ‘Who Pays’?. The views expressed by the community will be gathered into an independent report, which will help guide and inform future detailed Government policymaking. The results will feed into the review of the Spatial Plan in 2011 and the next five-year action plan under the ACT Government’s climate change strategy, “Weathering the Change”, Mr Stanhope said. The Government has appointed a number of “Champions” for the discussion: • Professor Tony Peacock • Francis Owusu • Rev Gordon Ramsey • Veronica Wensing • Sue Salthouse • David Flannery • Professor Will Steffen • Manny Notaras • Rebecca Vassarotti • Bronwyn Bock- Jonathan • Crispin Hull
Master Builders resists union applications to increase paid leave Master Builders has reinforced its opposition to ambit claims for increases in minimum Award standards. Master Builders recently lodged two submissions with Fair Work Australia opposing applications by the Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (CFMEU) to vary the Joinery and Building Trades Award 2010 and the Mobile Crane Hiring Award 2010. If granted, the applications would provide for five days of paid dispute resolution leave for ‘eligible employee representatives’. It is estimated that such leave would cost an employer in the order of $3000-4000 per employee representative together with the cost of lost productivity. The CFMEU claims that this form of leave was available prior to award modernisation and that it was left out of the Joinery and Building Trades Award 2010 and the Mobile Crane Hiring Award 2010 in error. Master Builders disagrees, arguing that the CFMEU’s application undermines the scheme for modern award variations established under the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) and denies the fact that Fair Work Australia decided to omit such leave from the modern awards, in preference of a simpler and more flexible provisions. The case may end up as a test case on what is or is not an error. A hearing has been listed for 11 October 2010. Master Builders will continue to resist claims by unions which unreasonably impose increased regulation of and costs for employers.
Master Builders backs Live in Canberra campaign Master Builders ACT has joined with the ACT Government to sponsor the Government’s 201011 Live in Canberra campaign, which encourages skilled workers to live and work in Canberra. In 2010 the Live in Canberra program has been an active participant at eight careers and employmentfocussed expos between March and August, including inaugural visits to Brisbane, Adelaide and Melbourne. Internationally a campaign was conducted in New Zealand for the first time in July. “The Live in Canberra program is a best-practice example of government, business, tertiary and Commonwealth sectors working together to tackle skills shortages head on,” Chief Minister Jon Stanhope said. “Our Live in Canberra partners benefit from the promotion of their businesses at these expos and access to skilled workers who are considering a move to the ACT,” Mr Stanhope said. “Through these partnerships we’re able to stand shoulder to shoulder with a range of businesses and institutions in the Territory who are concerned about the effects of the national skills shortage on our economy.” The partner organisations represent sectors including recruitment, health, finance, hospitality, construction, education, real estate and government. Canberra’s largest tertiary education institutions, the Canberra Institute of Technology, the Australian National University and the University of Canberra have pledged their support for the program. “Live in Canberra is working closely with these institutions to help attract students to Canberra and ensure our next generation of skilled workers know that Canberra is a great place in which to find work after they graduate,” Mr Stanhope said. Mr Stanhope acknowledged the ongoing support from the ACT and Region Chamber of Commerce and Industry and the Canberra Business Council.
Other Live in Canberra program partners for 2010-11 are: • Abode - The Apartment Hotel • ActewAGL • ACTTAB • Australian National University • Australian Public Service Commission • Calvary Heath Care ACT • Canberra Institute of Technology • Cantlie Recruitment Services • Crown Plaza Hotel • IELTS • Independent Property Group • IP Australia • Land Development Agency • Service One Members Banking • Springbank Rise • The Canberra Times • The Institute of Chartered Accountants in Australia • University of Canberra • Village Building Company
Coming events for 2010 CCF National Conference Date: 20 – 24 October Where: Hyatt Hotel The CCF National Conference offers numerous networking opportunities at formal and social occasions, a chance to promote your business to new and existing customers and suppliers, access to latest industry trends and discussion of pertinent issues, and much more. Kids Assist Program Graduation Breakfast
Date: Friday 29 October Where: Gungaderra Homestead, Harrison
Master Builders Annual Dinner 2010
Date: Thursday 4 November Where: National Gallery of Australia
The Kids Assist Program is a joint initiative between Master Builders Group Training and PBS Homes (ACT) Pty Ltd which gives Year 10 students who are at risk of not completing their high school education the opportunity to gain first-hand experience in the construction industry. The Annual Dinner is our premier networking event where members come together for a social and networking evening. The function provides an annual forum for the industry to take stock of its performance and to consider the outlook for the coming year. In 2010, our guest speaker will be highly acclaimed and respected urban planner Charles Landry, who helps cities transform their thinking so that they look at their potential imaginatively and can plan and act with originality. He assesses the interplay and the impacts of deeper global trends, and attempts to ground these in practical initiatives.
National Excellence in Building and Construction Awards
Date: Friday 19 November Where: Great Hall, Parliament House Each year Master Builders Australia acknowledges excellence in the building and construction industry through its prestigious National Awards. The State and Territory Award winners in their nominated categories (some categories are combined) become finalists for the National Awards and are judged accordingly.
Training Dates for Sept/oct 2010 OH&S Risk Management for Managers & Supervisors
Date: 1st November
Identification & Safe Handling of Asbestos
Date: 25th November
Suitable for individuals with a broad knowledge of risk analysis or project management who contribute well developed skills in creating solutions to unpredictable problems through analysis and evaluation of information from a variety of sources. They may have responsibility to provide guidance or to delegate aspects of these tasks to others. Nationally recognised course, approved by ACT Government to satisfy the regulatory requirements of the ACT Building Act, designed to meet the needs of tradespeople, services workers and builders, building certifiers and community members.
ACT Private Sector Building Activity $200
MILLION
$150
$100
$50
$0
Sep-09
Oct-09
Nov-09
Dec-09
Jan-10
Feb-10
Mar-10
Apr-10
May-10
Jun-10
Jul-10
Aug-10
The above graph and table below summarise private sector building activity for the various building sectors in the ACT over the past 12 months. // To Insert New Data Goto Object/Graph/Data The values for each month are depicted in millions of dollars.
• Copy and Paste Pivot Table Data into Data Additions and Alterations (Residential) Commercial Building Work Garages, Pools, Decks and Similar Structures Multi Unit New Homes
Sep-09 Oct-09 Nov-09 Dec-09 Jan-10 Feb-10 Mar-10 Apr-10 8.49 5.12 39.16 8.39 6.67 4.29 8.52 3.96 10.57 25.98 84.75 96.67 180.11 56.20 20.97 64.69 3.45 3.03 3.21 4.39 4.01 4.42 1.42 2.62 10.69 19.70 90.94 66.97 54.83 10.63 27.00 9.52 63.24 54.92 53.91 54.79 49.64 43.41 19.87 32.25
May10 10.85 21.09 2.75 3.05 23.55
Jun-10 8.55 53.29 8.52 44.86 55.60
Jul-10 Aug-10 5.01 1.51 119.43 41.78 2.18 3.48 21.88 30.84 27.54 13.83