MCLA Beacon - Volume 87 - Issue 6

Page 1

Volume 87

Thursday, October 25, 2018

Math Drop-In Center Doubles Attendance

Issue 6

Parlor Café

BY MAYA MCFADDEN SENIOR NEWS EDITOR MCLA’s Math Drop-In Center opened a year ago, and its attendance numbers have nearly doubled since this time last year. This semester set a record of 42 visits in a week in comparison to attendance numbers in the sixth week of last year, which saw only 11 visitors. “This time last year the record total in attendance numbers was 21 visitors in a week,” Benjamin Michener said in an email sent to the center’s faculty. “By allowing drop-ins, we can get the students right when they need the most help,” said assistant professor, Kebra Ward. Michener is the center’s head tutor, responsible for tracking all of the center’s sign-in data and reports back to the lead faculty. “Collecting and organizing data helps ensure that the drop-in center is running smoothly,” Michener said. “It also shows the school how useful of a resource the drop-in center is.” So far this semester, Ward said the center has continued to increase its attendance numbers each week. Some recent weeks have doubled the numbers of the previous week’s numbers. In his Oct. 22 email, Michener said, “It was another great week at the drop-in center, with a total of 26 visits over the course of five days. Students visited for topics ranging from Calculus 3 and Stats to Intro to Mechanics and Differential Equations.” Ward is the lead faculty of the math drop-in center this semester while Elizabeth Hartung, associate professor, is on sabbatical. Ward makes the center’s schedules, runs the tutor training sessions, and keeps track of student timesheets, among many other tasks. The center keeps an attendance record of visitor’s class information to track retention rates. At the end of each semester, the center also invites its past visitors to participate in a survey. One question on the survey for students is, “How helpful were the tutors

photo by Jake Vitali

MCLA alumni Nick Tardive ‘17 and Julia Daly ‘17 work the counter at the Parlor Café on Ashland St. which re-opens officially on Friday but had a soft opening Monday. The pair purchased the cafe over the summer. See story, page 6.

MATH, Page 4

Ballot Review

Question 2: Personhood and Political Spending BY RON LEJA EDITOR-IN-CHIEF

The commission would be made up of unpaid, Massachusetts residents and would not hold an age restriction in order to join. While applicants for the commission would be asked to list their qualifications and explain their general interest in the initiative, it would ultimately be open to candidates from all walks of life and varying professions. It would also define inalienable constitutional rights as those belonging specifically to individual human beings. As it stands, those rights currently apply to artificial entities and groups—i.e., corporations, unions, and nonprofit organizations. The commission would also be responsible for producing reports on political and election spending throughout the state, the legal ability of state government to regulate the influence corporations currently have on the political process, and proposals for the inclusion of a 28th amendment to limit the amount of money that these groups can add to campaigns.

This article is part of a three-part series in which The Beacon will be examining each of the questions to appear on the November Midterm ballot. For information pertaining to question 1, please visit our website at www.theonlinebeacon.com.

Question 2: What is the Corporate Personhood and Political Spending Initiative? Despite being nothing short of a mouthful, the Advisory Commission for Amendments to the U.S. Constitution Regarding Corporate Personhood and Political Spending Initiative, or question 2, has received very little attention when compared to the other questions on this year’s ballot. Reason being, question 2 involves pushing for something that many Americans, both Democrat and Republican, have been clamoring about for years: limiting the amount of money influencing politics. By overturning a 2010 Citizens United vs. FEC Supreme Court decision, question 2 could potentially lead to the creation of a 28th amendment in the United States Constitution. In the 2010 case, the Supreme Court ruled, in a 5-4 decision that corporate funding of independent political broadcasts for candidates cannot be limited, stating that doing so would violate their First Amendment rights. Should question 2 pass, it would allow for the creation of a fifteen-member citizens commission to propose amendments to the Constitution, particularly those in favor of overturning Citizens United.

Those in Favor?

photo illustration by Ron Leja

Question 2 aims to limit the amount of money corporations, unions and special interest groups are capable of submitting to political campaigns. In doing so, question 2 would allow the state government to to regulate the influence corporations currently have on the political process.

A yes vote on question 2 seems almost imminent. A recent poll conducted by the Boston Globe found that 71.6 percent of registered voters state that they are in support of the commission, while only 19.6 percent are not. It comes as no surprise, then, that compared to the other two questions on the November ballot, very little money has been spent campaigning for its approval. The campaign, led by People Govern, Not Money, has raised just under $281,000—pocket change compared to the millions of dollars spent campaigning for the other two questions.

BALLOT, Page 2


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.