The Independent Student Newspaper of the University of Toronto Mississauga since 1974
Issue 15 Volume 48 January 24 2022
themedium.ca
LAURENTIAN UNIVERSITY
HOME AWAY FROM HOME
LOCKED ON LEAFS
During the second semester of my second year, Laurentian announced their insolvency of $200 million. Staff and students went into a panic because most people found out through Instagram and no one knew what being insolvent meant.
The community, the constant interactions in the hallways and dining halls, living and eating together, formed the foundation of my closest friend group in UTM, and it truly started to feel like a home.
There is never a dull moment here in Leaf Land, and that is why this bi-weekly column is here: to keep you up to date on the latest ups and downs surrounding our source of pride, sorrow, and despair.
>> read more on page 07
>> read more on page 10
>> read more on page 14
NEWS
Annual Town Hall Meeting reveals no more physical distancing measures starting February Amanda Liu Contributor
O
n January 19, the University of Toronto Mississauga (UTM) hosted their annual Town Hall Meeting, where students were invited to attend via Zoom. During the meeting, several issues were addressed such as the return to in-person classes that was announced to begin on January 31. Students were also invited to submit their questions to the university’s Instagram account, @UofTMississauga, via Direct Message. For more questions, the university held a question and answer (Q&A) session for participating students.
>> IN-PERSON CLASSES continues on page 02
NEWS
OPINION
U of T overlooks accessibility concerns for students with medical conditions
We need to talk about the powerful people ignoring pandemic guidelines Shahed Ebesh Contributor
May Alsaigh News Editor
I
n response to U of T’s decision to maintain in-person learning for a few courses during the new semester, several students are expressing concerns over their health and safety—especially those who are immunocompromised. The rapid growth rate in Omicron infections places those suffering from medical conditions at a much greater risk than others. Students at the University of Toronto Mississauga (UTM) are coming together and holding the school administration accountable for overlooking these concerns. Started by Transparent UTMSU, #UTMDivided is a movement many students have joined to raise awareness about these issues while combating the barriers UTM has abstractedly established. On their Instagram, tagged @TransparentUTMSU, the group of student volunteers share testimonies and answers questions regarding these safety concerns. A hybrid learning approach is one of the many aspects the movement advocates for. >> ACCESSIBILITY continues on page 03
I
n this chapter of the pandemic, we’re all seasoned veterans of the ever-stringent rules to limit the spread of Covid-19. As things become more streamlined, policies lock-in to enforce these rules, like fines for breaking quarantine, or vaccine requirements to sit in enclosed spaces like restaurants. The argument given is that if we sacrifice enough, we can reduce infection rates and prevent unnecessary deaths. To protect our most vulnerable populations, we have all halted nearly two years of concerts, travel, weddings, school, and birthday parties. But not everyone. Not the rich, and worst of all, not even the ones who made the laws. U.K. Prime Minister Boris Johnson, for instance, was caught attending illegal parties throughout 2020 in what was dubbed “partygate” by U.K. Tories, leading some of his previous supporters to call for his resignation. U.K. Labour Leader Sir Keir Starmer on BBC news said, sounding bewildered, “I think the prime minister broke the law. I think he then lied about what had happened.” Or another example, Novak Djokovic, an unvaccinated tennis player who on January 16, 2022, was deported from
Australia. He left the Australian Open and is now barred from entering the country for three years after omitting on his visa that he had traveled to multiple countries in the two weeks before arriving to Australia, much to his outrage. Djokovic’s situation sparked anger from the Serbian government, which supported him ferociously, and equal outrage from the Australian public, who have a 90 per cent vaccination rate and are in the midst of huge wave of the highly transmittable Omicron variant. As Australian Immigration Minister Alex Hawke said, denying Djokovic entry was done, “on the basis that it was in the public interest to do so.” Should the rich and powerful be entitled to a different set of rules? Unless that power extends to some sort of super-powered immune system with zero transmissibility, no. Johnson and Djokovic are symptoms of a long-standing cultural phenomenon of rich and powerful people treating law as an inconvenient suggestion. A fly you shoo away. A punishment isn’t a punishment for everyone if it’s a sum of money. Djokovic is not, I assure you, kicking rocks in a tiny flat back home in Serbia. It sucks that he missed the Australian Open, but it’s also his own fault. >> GUIDELINES continues on page 05