Unions lawsuit continues News, page 2
Upgrading the deparment
A 1940’s spin to shakespeare
Professor talks policing
Eagles basketball woes
Opinion, page 4
Arts, page 5
Features, page 8
Sports, page 11
Most “civil” UTSU AGM in years All motions proposed at the AGM were passed by a majority vote MENNA ELNAKA NEWS EDITOR
MENNA ELNAKA NEWS EDITOR
This year’s UTSU Annual General Meeting, held last Thursday at the St. George campus, finished in record time for the first time in years, lasting under two hours after all motions proposed were passed by a majority. BYLAW AMENDMENTS The introduction of an Appellate Board, moved by UTSU’s VP internal Mathias Memmel, will offer another layer to hear grievances raised against UTSU. As previously reported by The Medium, the grievances are heard by UTSU’s board or the Executive Review Committee in the case that the grievance is against a UTSU executive. “After you’ve exhausted those processes, you can file a further grievance to something we’re calling the Appellate Board,” said Memmel in a previous interview with The Medium. During the AGM, Daman Singh,
UTSU executive resigns
OLIVIA ADAMCZYK/THE MEDIUM
UTSU’s AGM adjourned within less than two hours. University College Literary and Athletic Society vice-president, questioned the ERC’s ability to call more than one ratification meeting. The question raised the concern of whether or not the ERC can overturn the elections. In the case that it can, the Appellate Board will also be
granted this power; and if not, then the Appellate Board will not be able to either. “The idea that a body can just keep re-voting a vote is problematic,” said Singh. In response to the concern, Memmel explained that the role of the
ERC is that it can find fault in the procedure of elections and call for a new election. Additionally, the Appellate Board can penalize candidates and issue demerit points to disqualify a candidate. AGM continued on page 3
The University of Toronto Students’ Union announced the resignation of its VP external, Lucinda Qu, due to reasons described as “personal”. In the statement, released on October 29, UTSU states that Qu’s resignation was accepted in their board meeting on October 19. “Lucinda was an important member of the executive team,” read the statement. “She led the UTSU in supporting the members of UNITE HERE Local 75, and was one of the few student leaders to do so.” UTSU has opened the position for anyone to apply until November 25. The nominees are then interviewed by the Nominating Committee, who will forward at least two applicants to the board to decide. UTSU’s president Jasmine WongDenike did not respond to The Medium’s request for comment. This story is still developing, with more to follow.
U of T agrees to hold a forum with Peterson Student group writes letter condemning U of T’s treatment of Black and transphobic threats KASSANDRA HANGDAAN ASSISTANT NEWS EDITOR
The Students in Support of Free Speech administration have written an open letter decrying the university’s treatment of Black and transphobic threats. “The University has been quick to condemn online threats of physical violence against members of the transgender community; it has also been quick to condemn the few racists and transphobic slurs that were, unfortunately, voiced by a small minority at the Free Speech rally […],” read the letter. “However, we also believe that choosing to draw attention only to those incidents that were perpetrated against the transgender and the Black community is dangerous and wrong.” Other concerns listed include the university’s inaction in con-
CHANGE.ORG/PHOTO
Students in Support of Free Speech want more action from U of T. demning the “white noise ma- affairs, Cassandra Williams; the chines”, which they claimed were group believes that this violated used by the UTSU’s VP university the university’s Free Speech Policy.
According to Williams in a previous interview with The Medium, she was one of those responsible
for the noise, but stated that it was “noise-music”, not white noise, which she explained has been a music genre for decades. The student group also voiced concerns in their letter over slander, claiming that the university has failed to curb slurs directed towards students and supporters of the Free Speech rally. The group also included video footage supporting their claims, and warned the university that ignoring the footage would be equivalent to “condoning radical activist groups to silence, bully, assault, and threaten those who dare to disagree with their views.” “The University has failed to protect their students from violence, bullying, racism, sexism and slander. We are speaking up—we need you to listen,” stated the letter. Letter continued on page 2