A Christmas Carol comes to Michigan Tech
4
The
Huskies ready for a dogfight
The way Facebook changes friendship
5
6
Michigan Tech Lode
December 1, 2011
Serving the Michigan Tech Community Since 1921
Strict drug testing for Tech athletes TAYLOR STIPPEL Guest Writer For Tech athletes, returning to school at the beginning of every year usually means new books and new classes, but the same, familiar informational meeting with Athletic Trainer Brian Brewster. When Tech athletes arrived at their annual pre-season team meetings this fall, however, they were presented with something that they had never faced before: a new, in-house drug-testing policy. While Tech athletes have always been subject to the drugtesting policies of the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA), they are now required to sign a consent form, subjecting them to Michigan Tech’s in-house policy, which requires them to remain drug-free while participating in Michigan-TechAthletic-Department-sponsored activities, conditioning, practices and competitions. The new policy, which was modeled after similar policies created at other institutions, was created by a Drug Testing Advisory Committee consisting of Athletic Director Suzanne Sanregret, Athletic Trainer Brian Brewster, two head coaches, two student-athletes and a representative from counseling services, among others. The policy’s drug-testing component consists of six types of tests for alcohol and other drugs: unannounced, random testing; pre-season testing; reasonable suspicion testing; postseason/ championship testing; re-entry testing; and follow-up testing. Employing the specimen-collection methods of the National Center for Drug Free Sport, Tech
prohibits— and may screen student-athletes for— alcohol, anabolic steroids and marijuana and other street drugs. Athletic Director Suzanne Sanregret said, “We’ve recognized that there’s been an increase in street-drug use across the country, and the current NCAA drug testing policy is very stringent.” Indeed, the NCAA randomly selects athletes from each collegiate institution twice a year (once in the fall and once in the spring). If an athlete tests positive for a substance, he or she will be deemed ineligible for an entire year. According to Sanregret, “We felt that a policy needed to be there, but that (the NCAA) policy is pretty harsh.” One of the most beneficial aspects of Tech’s new drugtesting policy is its protection of Tech student-athletes from the NCAA’s heavy penalties. Because in-house drug-testing policies are distinct from the NCAA’s policy, the NCAA may not impose penalties unless an athlete tests positive during one of its own testing periods. Thus, a positive, in-house test is not reported to the NCAA, and Tech athletes are shielded from the threat of ineligibility for a year. Under Tech’s policy, athletes who test positive once are deemed ineligible for only 10 percent of their games, but they must also produce a negative test before returning to play and commit to educating and rehabilitating themselves through counseling sessions and community service. Tech’s policy specifies that the University will strive to “prevent substance use, abuse and dependence by student-athletes
through the following objectives: prevention, education, testing to provide a timely diagnosis, and professional guidance, treatment and rehabilitation.” Among the objectives of the Tech drug-testing policy is education. Sanregret said, “We need to educate our student-athletes on what is illegal and how it will hinder their performance.” Although American Athletic Institute President and Founder John Underwood was unable to make his scheduled visit to Tech earlier in the school year due to hurricanes in the east, Tech is planning to recruit more highquality speakers to impress upon student-athletes the negative effects of alcohol and drugs on performance, both on the court or field and in the classroom. Senior Women’s Basketball player
and member of the Tech Drug Advisory Committee Krista Kasuboski said that the new policy “is great for us because it’s not meant to punish athletes; it’s meant to open their eyes before they are caught by the NCAA, whose punishments are stricter and harsher.” In addition to educating student-athletes, the policy also strives to impress upon them the importance of representing both the University and the Michigan Tech community in a positive light. Brewster said, “studentathletes must be held accountable more than other students” since they are typically more visi-
ble to the community. Adding to this, Sanregret said that the new policy “ensures that our athletes are the role models that they are supposed to be.” While only in its first year, the policy is arguably already encouraging healthy choices among student-athletes. Two groups of student-athletes have been tested thus far, and none have tested positive for any banned substances. As Brewster said, “it’s about staying healthy, staying away from steroids and performance-enhancing drugs and, hopefully, leading (studentathletes) to a healthier life.”
tour guide and said that people on the tours are often shocked to hear she is a communications major. The Career Fair is another area that lacks resources for non-engineering majors. Banda mentioned that she often feels her major is not on the same level as engineering here on campus. She would like to see a Career Fair that caters to the large number of non-engineering majors on campus or one just for humanities and social sciences majors. In addition, Banda said, “At the end of the day, I wouldn’t trade my Michigan Tech experience for anything. With that said, I’m looking to attend a Liberal Arts institution, where my line of work is valued, for graduate school.” Banda also pointed out that research funding is disproportionately greater for engineering. I am an STC major as well and have felt a lack of support many times. For instance, when I went to the International Programs and Services (IPS) office to get more information about studying abroad, I inquired about a
school that specializes in writing. The IPS representative I spoke with said that writing schools are not part of the Study Abroad program because Michigan Tech is an engineering school. He then spent the remainder of the meeting trying to convince me to go to schools with which Michigan Tech is already affiliated, which was not helpful at all since he was speaking to an STC major. I also found it interesting that he took this stance in spite of the fact that Tech’s STC program won the National Writing Program Certificate of Excellence in 2005. When asked about this experience, Director of IPS, Thy Yang, said that despite its world-renowned engineering programs, IPS does not consider Michigan Tech to be an engineering school. IPS works with all students equally to find study-abroad opportunities for them. IPS also oversees all international-student admissions. Yang said that many of Tech’s study-abroad partner schools favor non-engineering majors.
In addition, Yang said that such partnering requires a demand on both sides. For instance, Tech may want to partner with a certain school, but if that school does not think they will benefit from a partnership with Tech, no partnership will be created. Yang also said, “If you have your heart set on a particular country or school we don’t have a formal agreement with, IPS will work with you to find a way to achieve your dream. Sometimes it may mean going to a school or country different from your original intention. Other times it means going outside or independent of IPS. In any case we want all students to go abroad and we will try our best to help you!” Assistant Director of Graduate Marketing and Advancement Kristi Isaacson was able to shed some light on graduate-school opportunities for non-engineering majors. Isaacson said that graduate school is a personal decision, and students need to research what graduate programs an institution is known for in addition to its undergraduate ma-
jors. She also said that in choosing a graduate school, students often work more closely with faculty members with a background in their research interests rather than the department as a whole. Therefore, after you pick a specific area of interest, even a school with a highly reputable program may not be the best option for you if that school does not have a faculty member who can serve as an appropriate advisor in your specified area. In addition, funding varies for graduate studies constantly, depending on who is providing the funding and why. Funding may be provided by the university or from the department. Isaacson said that money brought in by professors for their research will be spent in those research areas. Therefore, a disproportionate amount of funding may be available for graduate students in engineering if engineering faculty secures more research funding. Isaacson also said that graduate students might benefit from
Photo by Chance Agrella
“It’s about staying healthy, staying away from steroids and performance-enhancing drugs and, hopefully, leading [student athletes] to a healthier life.”— Athletic Trainer Brian Brewster
Non-engineering majors at 42% KRYSTEN COOPER Lode Writer Michigan Technological University has 7,031 students, both undergraduate and graduate, 42 percent of whom are studying a subject other than engineering. Nevertheless, students outside the field of engineering often feel like they are not getting the same Michigan Tech experience. In an article posted on the Michigan Tech News Web page, Assistant Vice-President of enrollment John Lehman said, “People are recognizing us for our strong programs in addition to engineering.” This may be true, but as an undergraduate student studying humanities, my experiences, and the experiences of others, have shown that despite our excellent programs, non-engineering majors are still lacking support. Jess Banda, a Scientific and Technical Communications (STC) student, has had such experiences during her time at Tech. Banda works as a campus
continued on page 2
Check out our extensive online presence! mtulode.com Subscribe to our RSS feed and check out our mobile-friendly website 24/7, with frequent updates and additional content.
facebook.com/mtulode Text “like mtulode” to “32665” to follow us on Facebook. Regular prizes offered to our Facebook fans (over $500 worth in 2011 already!).
twitter.com/mtulode Text “follow mtulode” to “40404” to follow us on Twitter. Receive an instant update for every new article posted to mtulode.com.